How Did The Saturn 5 Rocket Work? | James May: On The Moon | Earth Science
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 січ 2017
- James May meets Harrison Schmitt, one of the last men to ride Saturn 5 and learns a bit about the science behind a rocket with six million components. Subscribe: bit.ly/SubscribeToEarthLab
Taken From James May: On the Moon
Welcome to BBC Earth Science! Here we answer all your curious questions about science in the world around you (and further afield too). If there’s a question you have that we haven’t yet answered let us know in the comments on any of our videos and it could be answered by one of our Earth Science experts.
/ headsqueezetv - Розваги
"You're in Top Gear"
*puts on glasses*
YYEEEEAAAAAAAAAHHHH!
Well, he sure as hell isn't going to say fifth gear. That would just put a bad taste in his mouth.
And for that he will be nagged in the afterlife by a pedantic Scotsman (Sir Jackie). ;)
Captain Slow strikes again.
Tonit on butom gér
I see what you did there at the end.
Formulka very sharp of hem
Well, he was XD. probably for the best if that's what the BBC want.
You do a grand tour on the moon
oh wow, I thought it was a tongue in cheek reference but it was actually a shameful plug :P
Subliminal advertisement
That ship was quite sophisticated. Perhaps the basic idea of a rocket isn't. But the way the F1 is controlled is very ingenious, and the idea of making it was audacious. An utter monster of a machine.
I’m happy they built a hanger to hold the rocket. For many years it wasted away outside being damaged by Houston weather. Such a masterpiece of engineering shouldn’t have been left to rust.
theres more than one u no
You'd think with all the money they got by faking the moon missions they could have afforded a shed to put it in sooner than that. [/sarcasm]
smithfan22
The Kennedy Space Center's Saturn 5 was in a similar condition - the space coast environment is very hard on equipment and machinery - and was finally put under cover in 1997. I've seen it three times now and it is very well preserved.
The Saturn at Huntsville is also now under cover.
I didn't know where this video was made. But I am in full agreement. The story is the same for the Saturn V static display at KSC. The last time I visited, in 2011, I was relieved to see they'd finally sheltered it.
MarsFKA I’ve seen the one in Huntsville, before it was refurbished and enclosed. A video just doesn’t do justice to the size of the Saturn. The one in Huntsville has the full system, but was used for ground testing, not for actual flight. The other two were supposed to be used for Apollo 18-20, which were all cancelled.
Flying to the moon must have been a grand tour.
I don't think you get the joke mate
And... you can't spell programme.. :-)
Samuel Rosenberg Voyager 2 did fly the “grand tour” and flew by all four Outer Planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune). Voyager 1 flew by Jupiter and Saturn, and is just now exiting the Solar System.
Even today, doing a manned “grand tour” would not be possible (and the planets won’t be in the proper alignment for several decades) as it’s essentially a one way trip. The logistics would be a nightmare, as life support, and supplies would require a huge spacecraft. You would also need to bring along a lot of fuel if you ever wanted to return home, because the Voyagers got most of their speed from gravity boosts from those planets.
Jupiter would likely be the most difficult for a manned crew, as the radiation is deadly.
No other spacecraft since Voyager has returned to Uranus or Neptune.
Being in the space program back in the late 1950s to the 1960s and early 1970s meant you had balls.
A grand tour of Hollywood.
Harrison Schmitt has always been one of my favorite Apollo guys
Disappointingly, he's a climate change denialist.
@@yassassin6425oh shit your right, that’s pretty disappointing honestly.
@@yassassin6425
Indeed!
Being an expert on lunar geology doesn't make you an expert on planets with _atmospheres,_ unlike climatologists like James Hansen who has studied the atmospheres of Earth and other planets since before Armstrong walked on the Moon.
Huh?!
@@yassassin6425
6 million components. James May The Reassembler: Saturn 5 rocket.....
In the words of clarkson if that happenes "A BBC film crew just hung themselves"
*hanged
hung*
No, hanged. "Hanged" is the past tense for execution by strangulation or snapping the neck by a rope.
rockaholictom Well, many of the parts were redundant, so that one failure wouldn’t cause an abort. The designers of the Saturn booster in particular had a large number of redundant systems. And it certainly worked well. It never had a major failure, a rarity in those early days of rocketry. It even survived two lightning strikes during the launch of Apollo 12. Everything on the CM had to be “rebooted”, but the Saturn’s “brain” (the guidance system), the Instrument Unit (IU) was well shielded, and it kept the booster on course into orbit.
Always enjoy May narrating a program.
You're coasting, you're in *The Grand Tour*
I just visited this exhibit yesterday! So damned amazing, I loved getting to see this rocket, thanks for the suggestion, May!
Tonight on the reassembler, I take this classic 1960s spaceship and reassemble it from it's 6 million component parts!
*I SAWED THIS ROCKET IN HALF*
@@matthewdavidjarvis6039 *12 months and 100 episodes later*
"Okay everyone, we are 12% done with the rocket. We still need a few more time."
@@matthewdavidjarvis6039 *100 years and 9000 episodes later*
"We are 73% done with the rocket. Still 27% away from it being finished."
@@ismaellopez3963 *130 years later and 10302 episode later*
Okay everyone we finally completed the 80% of it but since we have better technology and rocket we are going to switch to other option
@@anonymousstout4759 epic waste of time there lmao
Dear Mr. Harrison Schmitt, thank you so much for having explained us the Saturn V Rocket. You were the last Man on the moon, you have experienced so much, I think you know so much we all will never know! Dear Mr. Schmitt, thanks again, your work will be in the history of human mankind! I was 7 years old when Apollo 11 launched together with Neil Armstrong, Edwin Aldrin and Michael Collins, again thanks!
Best greetings out of Bavaria, Germany!
He said top gear! On a BBC channel.... Ohh rest my beating heart!
its from 2009
Ben Deem but BBC put it up now... So they are trying to get whatever they can
that's the joke.
James: "It's not very sophisticated"
Don't make me send Jeremy Clarkson down to haunt you!
Reminds me, a retired plumber, all the times an electrician told me he tried being a plumber and decided wiring was his calling.
Holding back liquid pressures past all those fittings........amazing.
I mean, how hard can it be?
Am I the only one that enjoys James May's science?? I like him on GT but I want to see more science from him!
I like how he said top gear and not fifth gear ;)
There was a joke from Jezza long time ago (like 10 years ago) "allways use Top gear.. renember Fifth gear is no good"
sparrowJLT The competing show that was a Top Gear ripoff called itself 5th Gear. I guess that made "5th gear" unmentionable at the BBC.
@@johnfrancisdoe1563 i mean, fifth gear was more down to the real formula of being a car show wasn't it. like the top gear in 90s. after 2002, top gear became much more than that but it kinda lost its educational/journalism side. fifth gear filled that hole. you'd watch fifth gear for education and insights, you'd watch top gear for fun.
@@johnfrancisdoe1563 5th Gear was what Tiff Needell, Vicky Henderson and Quentin Wilson wento to do when the original Top Gear was cancelled in the late 90s.. then Jezza went to do standaline videos along Andy Willman .. and few years later BBC offered Willman and Clarkson to recover TG ..
their rivality was of course an ongoing joke among them.. Clarkson continued doing videos with Needell and Henderson across the years well after both shows had been on the road
1st gear*
i've seen this rocket in person... it's breathtaking
I watch britlab only because of James may
Alexander Anderson nnn
This is one of the best gentlemen in existence.
I’ve seen the Saturn 5 in person and its truly amazing
It is saturn v !!!
My daily commute used to be a 20 mins drive from Taylor Lake Village to Webster. It was 15 mins if I stayed on NASA Road 1 most of the way, but I couldn't resist hanging a right into Saturn Ln so I could drive past the Rocket Park hangar that this segment is filmed in.
May: “You’re in top gear.”
Me: “He said the words! He said the words!”
guys, this recording was taken in 2009, way before James left top gear.
I thought he looked WAY younger than on the GT.
no he is using a new lego from june
Sir Blibblob.... Yeah, that's why he got the plug in !
I love the way James May explains everything...
As Heinlein said, low earth orbit is halfway to everywhere.
Therefore, all future flights to the Moon should be from the ISS, or any future replacements of it, rather than ground-launched.
@Voltaic Fire Spaceplanes will definitely get more people into orbit.
Wow thanks for the great explanation!
Hooray for May!
I thought he was going to say 5th gear but he avoided that
Huge James May fan!
Some correction is in order.
You're only holding and gesturing with the command and service module sections that will be departing Earth orbit in route to the Moon.
A very necessary element in order to land on the Moon is the (LM), lunar module and it's descent stage. Which will be attached together on their outbound journey to the moon, but will be left behind upon return.
Very good! I watch the BBC channel every chance I get on my local cable network! 👏👍
In top gear and on to the grand tour of our solar system aye? Lol
Coop vid!.. thanks! 👍🇳🇿
Jeremy's explanation to the working of Saturn V: POWER!!!!!!!
TLI doesn't cause the spacecraft to leave the Earth's orbit per se, it just modifies the orbit from a circular parking orbit to a highly eccentric transfer orbit that allows the vehicle to be captured by the moon's gravity.
Great video
Last bit of word made my day!
I like the fact that he could have said fifth gear as well but didn't hahaha
I wouldn't classify the turbo pumps in the motor as "not very sophisticated"
The turbo pumps could make the Columbia River flow backward.
Exactly. Simple does not mean imprecise.
He’s like chuck Norris, to him they are “not very sophisticated “
"Not very sophisticated" is perhaps referring to the turbo pumps existence and size.
A modern closed cycle engine like the RD-180 simply eliminated these dinosaurs and there is another issue with the F-1 engines, they are cooled with a series of small tubes that form the combustion chamber - presenting great frictional loss so the turbo pump has to be much bigger then in a modern engine.
Incidentally the tubular cooling also creates a limit of combustion pressures which severely limits power and efficiency, couple that with the strange choice of non mixing straight through injectors on the injector plate means that much of the fuel in the F-1 burns 'safely' outside of the engine with a bright yellow glow and huge tail flame.
The F-1 engine is such a poor design that no aspect of it's design was ever used again and NASA totally redesigned the engines for the Shuttle in order to get an efficient launch. The F-1 choice of tubular cooling, straight injectors and external turbo pump are notably missing from the world's best rocket engines today, the RD-180 and derivatives.
"It's the science behind . . " Sorry Dylan , the Apollo project rockets had little or nothing to do with science, which is about discovering the working of nature. The Apollo project worked by assembling a whole collection of fundamental principles in such a way that the 6 million parts all worked together to get the desired result - a man on the Moon and back again, safely.
The people who do this kind of work are called 'engineers' who understand very well every detail of what is needed, they are absolutely not carrying out 'scietific experiments' where the crews lives are dependent on the result. With a disaster like the 'Challenger Shuttle' explosiong (killed all crew and passengers) it was not a failure on the part of the designers, the failure was due was to Launch Control (NASA management) deciding to launch an ice coated vehicle that was much colder than its design specification. Launch Control had received advice from the designers not to launch in the icy conditions because the seals on the Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs) would not close to gas tight at such a low temperature with the consequential total LoV (loss of vehicle). Doing anything like that in the military produces an immediate courts martial.
It is very strange that the relevant NASA decision takers were not charged with murder or at least with incompetence because they chose to ignore their own specification.
It's incredible! I grew up idolizing Sally Ride! Wow!
Oh ho! Nicely done.
Well done.!..Dr Slow....👍
Kudos to Dr. Schmitt for not getting visibly miffed at James May for making the same asinine comment TWICE. "Capt. Slow" lived up to his name in this clip. "It's actually not very sophisticated, is it?" What?!
I was very glad when they finally put the V in a enclosed, climate controlled building. Been several times while it was outdoor. Sure, it looked really awesome sitting at JSC but Its too hot in Texas to keep her in the elements. Plus she is close to Clearlake & Galveston and rust. If you havent seen the Saturn V in person then you should add it to the bucket list. Video does no justice. In person you will find yourself awe at the sheer size. It, to this day was the fastest thing ever built.(I think something coming into Earth went faster but it was aided by gravity and The V had to fight gravity). Also, We should have got 1 of the Shuttles, and not a actual size model. NY did not deserve one. Mission Control is in Houston (Clearlake) Astronauts have and probably always will train here (Ellington Field). We have the Vomit Commet too. The 1st word on the moon; after the landing checklist was complete was not "New York". It was "Houston...the Eagle has landed". Cool Video
Our finest hour 🤩
Want to hear a joke? 3:56
AfonsoSousa31 the initial release of this one hour documentary for the UK was June 21, 2009, God, that was…6 and a half years ago, more or less.
It's a catchy name!
the initial release of this one hour documentary for the UK was June 21, 2009, God, that was…6 and a half years ago, more or less.
the initial release of this one hour documentary for the UK was June 21, 2009, God, that was…9 years ago, more or less.
AfonsoSousa31 e
Dry good analogy! Never thought of it that way.
Maravilliso hazaña inolvidable para toda la humanidad 🌵🌵🇲🇽
The irony of having Captain Slow going over one of the fastest man made objects ever.
I've been in that building! I wish the fairings were there. There's an F1 engine at the Seattle museum of flight.
I wish I knew what model of the Saturn V he had at the end. I'd love to buy one.
Ever found out?
@@FlorisMsvld Nope.
what brand of model is that? i can never find one that has all the stages and where the command module and service module seperate
"You're in Top Gear"
- video ends
ahhhhh, my heart DX
You gotta love the emphasis on Top Gear!
You forgot about the LM, which actually LANDED on the moon? It's housed within the odd shaped looking part, that looks like an elongated dog med collar! It's attached to the SM, until the astronauts were ready to dock the CM with the LM! THAT IS TOP GEAR! Then they'd disconnect it, bolts would blow the housing off, flip the CM/SM around, dock it properly, at the correct time. - Daughter of one of the Rockwell Engineers, who worked on Sat V stage 2, all CM Block-2s to the moon, and that LM encasement. You're welcome.
Where can I watch the full documentary?
He had to mention Top Gear, when talking about rockets !
every time I see his face I think of captain boring but what he talks about is interesting
Anyone know where the rest of this is?
the editor cut to quickly at the end, should have been a bit of pause at the end after captain Slow wryly said top gear.
The title should be "A subjective impression of the Saturn V" There was almost no information about how it actually works.
There's plenty of information about how it worked. Just because you want to think there isn't info or don't know how to look it up doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Notmade ofPeople go watch the full documentary this is just a segment
He forgot the Lunar Module at the end, your not landing on the moon without one.
What is the model That James is using at the end of this video? can you purchase it.
I don't know about that one in particular, but there are several models you can purchase, one of them by Revell (probably the one I hear the most about)
and it looks quite like this one, but I could be wrong
It appears to be a lot more substantial than the Revell kit.
probably the UK Airfix kit, not the Revell one. I do own both of them, Revell has a deployable SLA, but Airfix hasn't.
just buy the lego one thats coming out soon
I do like the way Mr Schmitt's humility and wisdom brings out this boyish fascination in May - he knows who the star of this show is and for once it isn't him.
3:56 pun intended.
weird this one and the one at the space and rocket center are both missing the interstage part between stages 2 and 3.. dang wish we had one fully complete to display.
"... you're coasting--you're in top gear." This quotation needs no further citation. It could only be spoken by Mr. Slowly.
3:55 "...You're in top gear..." Roll credits
The Saturn V was so big because it needed to carry the weight of the Astronauts balls.
Man propose The Stig to be pilot for the next Moon missions!:))))))
from 0:50 to 1:25 James put the "rocket science" concept in something normal in terms of the ingenuity and creativity, witch is right, build big for more fuel. well done for the truth
Anyone know what model James uses in the diner?
Does anyone know if this doco is available on dvd ?
You can probably get it from the BBC. I'm too lazy to check right now, though.
You forgot the LEM. The service module turned around, picked up the LEM and then went to the moon.
you forgot it's "LM"
I should really make the twenty mile drive to JSC to see the Saturn 5 sometime.
So happy I have come across this and not seen the comment board bombarded with flat earth dome trolls.
Yet. The cretins will show up sooner or later.
Not a lot of people can say what he can say. ❤️
ouch saying that last line had to hurt
Close, the first stage fuel was RP-1 which is more similar to Jet-A, where as aviation fuel is more similar to normal gasoline.
It's crazy, when they left earth's gravity and headed out to the moon, they had to be going where the moon would be not where it was.
The scale model James' using for explaining the vector Saturn stages at the end of the video is a Lego model or what? Thanks! :)
The “model” he used was and still is such a function and good looking toy, too bad they stopped making them. Still got mine, and I’m only missing one leg from the lunar lander.
Who manufactured that toy Saturn V?
Whats the music ? please
Don't forget about the LM (LEM) Lunar Module.Without the LM your not landing on the moon and returning to lunar orbit (it the only spacecraft designed to operate in the vacuum of space and the only manned spacecraft to land on a extraterrestrial surface) The most fault free component of the whole scheme!
Beauty
This was made in 2009 so yeah he can say Topgear without it being akward
i always eat at that restaurant he was at near the end. good food.
Shows you why SpaceX is doing something truly amazing by landing back those initial stage rockets
thats truly remarkable but they arent as big as the saturn V and also have very very much better components and computers. For its day the saturn V was unbelievably advanced. At that time computers were so big you could just fit it in a room. The computer of the saturn V was so increadibly advanced for its time you cant imagine... SpaceX could just use a cellphone if they wanted to. Space X is good and does really get new stuff going, which I prefer over all our standard-marketing-bullshit we have got today... But for my the saturn V is more fascinating. I will be pleased if space X really somehow (manned or unmanned) gets someone or something to mars with no flaws. That would really be a big show ;)
Im really looking forward to december to see if they can finally launch the Falcon heavy..and if they finally do that BFR new rocket.. sounds a bit like smoke.. but so did the SpaceX thing of using reusable rocket stages capable of launching several tons into orbit reliably.. and they did it.. they are making the space race and space advancements real again (specially after the shuttle retiring setback)
falcon heavy is up to 5 million pounds of thrust, getting into saturn V territory there, absolutely agreed though it's unbelievable how advanced and powerful that rocket was, probably the most impressive to date.
Artemis 1 definitely stole thunder away from Starship, hope the latter will finally have a full assembly launch and get into orbit before the Artemis 2 mission…
That was surprisingly... accurate.
Not many short documentaries have pulled this off so far.
Thank you.
The most extraordinary thing about this rocket was the only thing that came back was the tiny pointed bit at the top below the escape system
Harrison 'Jack' Schmitt
RIP Al Warden
Who is that
@@DCcopter Command Module Pilot for Apollo 15. One of 24 Moon walkers. Passed in March, at age 88.
@@stratoblaster3236
There were 12 moonwalkers. You are correct, that Alfred Warden was the CM pilot, but that meant he never descended to the surface. The two that did on that particular mission were Dave Scott and Jim Irwin.
Where do I get a model of the Saturn V like that?
I have that exact same model Saturn V.
What model brand is that? Where can I buy it?
Yeah it worked perfectly in putting three men into low earth orbit and no farther........ brilliant design
I want that model.
the origin of statistical approach of quality management
And then the Space Shuttle turned out to be the most lethal US spacecraft; the 1986 Challenger explosion attributed to a faulty o-ring on the starboard SRB, and the 2003 break-up of Columbia during reentry after a piece of ET insulation came off during liftoff, ripping up the orbiter heat shield.
Yes, sadly the shuttle claimed the lives of 14 astronauts but that was in 135 launches versus 13 of the Saturn V. However, NASA were very fortunate that more of these missions didn't end in disaster. The shuttle was a flawed design, sat in a prone position at launch, the heat shield was exposed and vulnerable and it lacked a viable launch escape system.
Incidentally, technically Challenger didn't 'explode'. The failure of the o-ring seal on the right side SRB that you refer to allowed white-hot exhaust gases to leak out. These gases burned through part of the external tank, and the aft booster attachment strut. When the rear of the tank gave way, the strut gave way also, which allowed the booster to pivot around the top attachment strut and crash into the top of the tank. The external tank disintegrated, which allowed many thousands of litres of liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen to spill out and vapourise. This is what caused the large white cloud that is so iconic an image of the Challenger accident. The orange glow was caused by the subsequent ignition of the hydrogen.
I like the Saturn V much more than the Shuttle, but that comparison is a bit unfair.
The Shuttle had 135 launches while the Saturn v had only 13, and 3 of those (Apollo 4 and 6 and Skylab) were unmanned and couldn't have killed anyone. We will never know if a hypothetical 14th Saturn V launch would have ended in a disaster.
0:24 when a posh bird hooks up with you more than once
Rocket science is easy...
... it was metallurgy that was the crux of the matter. Whole new metals/techniques had to be invented/created in order to create the worlds strongest rockets....
Man built that.
A question to Mr. James May. Can a piston engine get heavier, the higher the rpms.?