This Is How the Germans Dominated (and Killed) Philosophy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 вер 2024
  • To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/... . The first 200 of you will get 20% off Brilliant’s annual premium subscription.
    Support the channel
    ► Buy me a coffee: ko-fi.com/fict...
    ► Get perks on Patreon: / fictionbeast
    WHERE TO FIND ME:
    ► Website: fictionbeast.com
    ►Instagram: / fictionbeastofficial
    ►Tiktok: www.tiktok.com...
    ► E-mail: fictionbeastofficial {at} gmail.com
    ► Audio Podcast: redcircle.com/...
    This video is sponsored by Brilliant.
    Music:
    We Are Here by Declan DP / declandp
    Licensing Agreement: declandp.info/m...
    Free Download / Stream: bit.ly/_we-are...
    Music promoted by Audio Library • We Are Here - Declan D...
    #fictionbeast
    #philosophy
    #literature

КОМЕНТАРІ • 188

  • @Fiction_Beast
    @Fiction_Beast  7 місяців тому +4

    To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/FictionBeast/ . The first 200 of you will get 20% off Brilliant’s annual premium subscription.

    • @FriedrichNietzsche-kq2hh
      @FriedrichNietzsche-kq2hh 6 місяців тому

      It makes me happy that you can now earn money for your work. You deserve that! :)

  • @1terminatorr
    @1terminatorr 6 місяців тому +28

    An over analytical German, reflecting on the over analytical nature of Germans.

    • @papajohnloki
      @papajohnloki 2 місяці тому

      your point being?

    • @k.schmidt2740
      @k.schmidt2740 2 місяці тому +4

      German? What German cannot pronounce a German compound word (and mispronounces "Schadenfreude")?? The commentator is of some other mother tongue.

  • @loriedmundson782
    @loriedmundson782 6 місяців тому +20

    The best thing about your channel is your whimsical sense of humor. An intellectual who values laughter is rare indeed.

  • @oreocarlton3343
    @oreocarlton3343 6 місяців тому +10

    The humour theory falls once you realize how good british humour is and they arent far from Germany geographically or genetically.

  • @michaelgoetze2103
    @michaelgoetze2103 6 місяців тому +23

    The problem with the watch making analogy is that a good portion of it is in French speaking Switzerland.

  • @mariavairo1640
    @mariavairo1640 6 місяців тому +10

    GRACIAS!!!!!!!!! Soy una doña (argentina) de 81 años, sin estudios universitarios pero siempre he pensado que había un antes y un después de Nietzsche en filosofía, ya que, en mi reducida posibilidad de explicarme, él "completaba" los "devaneos teóricos" con el "componente psicológico" pero no tenía argumentos como para sostenerlo frente a una amiga Dra en Filosofía y creyente cristiana. Pocas veces he disfrutado tanto un video como este por la "completísima síntesis" y el humor con la que ofreces tan maravillosa información. Es un abrazo para mi alma.
    NO veo la casualidad de q Byung haya elegido ese pais para estudiar...todas sus orienta-les-tivas células lo deben haber guiado❤

  • @misterprogressive8730
    @misterprogressive8730 6 місяців тому +73

    Germans didnt kill philosophy. Its still live and kicking here. People are still studying it and still use it in public discourses. Its just that people dont usually get a job with a philosophy degree. So, capitalistic job market is killing philosophy not the germans.

    • @ahmedmahmud4238
      @ahmedmahmud4238 6 місяців тому +2

      If you made a video you would be closer to the trut

    • @1terminatorr
      @1terminatorr 6 місяців тому +14

      Philosophy is studied rather than being built on though. Modern philosophy is a fraction of the effort it used to be

    • @philosophemes
      @philosophemes 6 місяців тому +10

      You're 100% right that the political economy has killed philosophy at the universities (see Schopenhauer's essay on this), but the "Kant killed philosophy" quip is right also, but in a different way. Kant succeeded at revealing philosophy's internal organization as a science. So, that leads to the "death" of philosophy because Kant already showed all its possible turns. That's why there's so much talk nowadays (Baudrillard being the best of them) by "philosophers" asking whether there is such a thing as "the future." Everything has already been shown; everything's already been done, and so on... But, your point is very important, what passes for academic philosophy nowadays is bought and paid for by politicians. It's very rare to see any real philosophy happening at [(Post) Modern] universities, imo. I think what students don't realize is just how lazy philosophy professors are allowed to be. Sincerely. Once they're in the right clique, they get to teach pretty much whatever they want. And, that's why there's so much non-sense and politics-masked-as-philosophy being taught at the universities.

    • @robertabrahamsen9076
      @robertabrahamsen9076 6 місяців тому +8

      You're confusing academic with actual philosophy. Yes, there's some overlap, but not much. Most genuine philosophers aren't in the hive of charlatans known as academia. They're out in the world, experiencing it, confronting it. The problem isn't that it's too hard to make a living as a "philosopher," it's that it's too easy.

    • @robertabrahamsen9076
      @robertabrahamsen9076 6 місяців тому

      @@thotslayer9914 I doubt it. I hope I did not imply I could.

  • @dohlecarnett1866
    @dohlecarnett1866 Місяць тому +1

    I think that is a good essay about how the Germans are as philosophers. It's still funny how people repeat this story about Kant's structured day. While this indeed happend he only did this at the last year of his life. Before his neighbour did it and Kant learned from him that it was necessary in later life to keep your mind up. In his younger days Kant was maybe not a party animal but often in salons and telling jokes.

  • @jimvonkropsberg399
    @jimvonkropsberg399 6 місяців тому +21

    Germany is called… Das Land der Dichter & Denker… the Country of poets & Philosophers 📖

    • @sheridansherr8974
      @sheridansherr8974 6 місяців тому +2

      WAS called.. Aftet ww2 not any more

    • @KunDziki
      @KunDziki 6 місяців тому

      ​@@sheridansherr8974after the II WW the also become übermenschen 😊

    • @FriedrichNietzsche-kq2hh
      @FriedrichNietzsche-kq2hh 6 місяців тому +1

      Was called in the 19th century because we only had Dichter (A. v. Arnim, B. v. Arnim, Novalis, Schlegel, L. Tieck or A. v. Droste-Hülshoff) or Denker. That's why Thomas Mann is so precious to us: He introduced the novel to germany, so that the german speaking world had the best writers: H. Hesse, B. Brecht, A. Seghers, G. Hauptmann, G. Grass, H. Henny Jahnn, U. Johnson, P. Süskind, H. Böll, H. Mann, K. Mann, F. Kafka, H. Broch, R. Musil, A. Schnitzler, S. Zweig, A. Schmidt ...

  • @shaunmclorie5929
    @shaunmclorie5929 6 місяців тому +3

    This channel is unbelievably good, educational, entertaining and well researched.

  • @cheri238
    @cheri238 7 місяців тому +5

    Thank you, Fiction Beast!!! Brillant as always!!!🙏❤️🌎🌿🎵🕊🎵🎶

  • @Sachie465
    @Sachie465 6 місяців тому +4

    I really enjoyed this one. The last word sent shivers down my spine.

  • @RudrashayanAutodeus-ok8df
    @RudrashayanAutodeus-ok8df 6 місяців тому +2

    I used to study philosophy when 9 //then left ot cause my father said "useless people do philosophy and useful people do science"

    • @dohlecarnett1866
      @dohlecarnett1866 Місяць тому +1

      I think all the chaos we see Today has a lot to do with more people and especially younger folks are not exposed to "useless" philosophy

  • @ReynaSingh
    @ReynaSingh 6 місяців тому +9

    Interesting video, keep it up

    • @JaysonT1
      @JaysonT1 6 місяців тому

      Hi Reyna 🖐😁

  • @Sachie465
    @Sachie465 6 місяців тому +1

    As is the case in German, the majority of words in Chinese are compound words. As you pointed out, compound words are an effective way of creating and conveying meaning.

  • @muctebanesiri
    @muctebanesiri 6 місяців тому +1

    This was actually a question I've been thinking lately. It was really odd how Germans dominated philosophy.

  • @PeterBernardMDS1
    @PeterBernardMDS1 6 місяців тому +1

    I love this video. Great work. You made some very inciteful observations in here. That pragmatists have dominated the media from the start helps explain why they have traditionally had the loudest voice about the course of history but thankfully that may be changing. Their hold is no longer absolute. Using terms like 'conspiracy theory' 'dis-information' and 'mis-informed' are seen for what they are: attempts at mental manipulation through language. Ordinary folk are catching onto the tactics of 'mental colonization'. Pragmatism, embodied in Science, which addresses how things work can never really dispel Idealism as embodied in Philosophy. But the pragmatists will continue to 'SHOUT' that it has.

  • @diphyllum8180
    @diphyllum8180 6 місяців тому +3

    This cites the common misconception that Gutenberg invented the printing press -- he did not. He invented a printing press yes, but for twenty years already there had been printing presses. The first was invented by a Korean, and they were improved on by Uyghurs before making their way to Europe, where Gutenberg and others improved them further.

    • @dohlecarnett1866
      @dohlecarnett1866 Місяць тому

      Yes, Guttenberg basically combined existing techniques and marketed them properly. He's the entrepreneur of his day and it payed out for him.

    • @suchendnachwahrheit9143
      @suchendnachwahrheit9143 17 днів тому

      Is the connection between Guttenberg and the East Asian inventions proven? Would be interesting to know

  • @sollbruchstelleamknicklich9495
    @sollbruchstelleamknicklich9495 6 місяців тому +2

    6:55 he did laugh, quite a lot in fact. We have many reports from Kants students that he would often make downright childish jokes while he lectures. Other reports from acquaintances strongly paint the picture of Kant as a jovial happy fellow who loved silly jokes. - besides Kant, Mozart for example is also famous for his dull childish humor. I mean he composed a canon with the title "Leck mich im Arsch" which literally translates to: lick me inside my asshole.

  • @TheArchives111
    @TheArchives111 6 місяців тому +1

    The truth about philosophy is to magnify the deep dark areas of our life. Those who seeks to replace philosophy are hiding their darkness. The real great respects of philosophers are those who have contained the darkest aspect of their lives eg. envy, greed, unauthentic etc. JamesWhiskey

  • @Yatukih_001
    @Yatukih_001 5 місяців тому

    In other words, Sky Net sent Kant back into time and Kant was really T - 750, the original Terminator. Thanks for the video man! Excellent narration!! Best wishes to you from Iceland!!

  • @niccoloflorence
    @niccoloflorence 7 місяців тому +4

    Your content is good but you need to use better artwork (especially for thumbnails) and remove this blue background to attract more eyeballs!!

  • @jasemalhammadi4228
    @jasemalhammadi4228 6 місяців тому +3

    i thought the “why” question has to do with teleology and the purpose of things which can’t be answered.

    • @terrifictomm
      @terrifictomm 6 місяців тому

      Where did you get that idea?

  • @Ivan-pr7ku
    @Ivan-pr7ku 6 місяців тому +1

    Germans culturally would have been much closer to the Carthaginians than the Romans. It took centuries and many tribulations until the German peoples were unified under single political authority. And when they did, the results were of no surprise.

  • @supgov5239
    @supgov5239 5 місяців тому +1

    Where did you get the idea about warm and cold climate? Im not sure I follow, but your resulting conclusion from it that the germans isolate from one another is very interesting.
    It happens to reflect the defining property of Western culture as described by Oswald Spengler in his book The Decline of the West. I HIGHLY recommend it. It is about much more than the namesake title or the cycles of history! It gives a typology of cultures that reveals more than obscures unlike the typical historian.
    The other reason why I find your comment interesting as well as it harks be back to The Decline is the corresponding warm climate part; that religions should come from it. At least, the religions you mentioned come from the early-Persian and Indian cultures which Spengler mentions and gives general characterizations of - and I think there's a possibility of a further classification that results in these two being of broadly the same type.
    Either way, I do think Spengler gives comment somewhere in his book something to do with cold/warm climate, although I might be thinking of his dichotomy between the West vs. the Classical cultures in relation to evening and morning. He does this both not only metaphorically but also by outlining how different social/ritual tendencies seem to happen at those corresponding times.

    • @dohlecarnett1866
      @dohlecarnett1866 Місяць тому

      Spengler is an odd reactionary and his book should be read with caution. Nevertheless, there is some insight in there especially of that.

  • @sgonzalez_guitarra
    @sgonzalez_guitarra 7 місяців тому +2

    Where do you find all these beautiful paintings? Can you give names of your favorite painters? Thank you for always bringing beautiful and insightful videos!

    • @liltick102
      @liltick102 6 місяців тому +2

      Painting books credited to the painter containing their paintings - maybe a box set, fiction beast has the same one’s I have.
      The book titles are only the first names - Goya, Renoir, so on. The Hyperion collection.

  • @sahilhossain8204
    @sahilhossain8204 13 днів тому

    Lore of This Is How the Germans Dominated (and Killed) Philosophy momentum 100

  • @ahsav2694
    @ahsav2694 10 днів тому

    Anyone who claims that "people in cold climates keep their distance" has clearly never been to the American Midwest 😂

  • @serendipity5951
    @serendipity5951 5 місяців тому

    Thanks for simplifying things.

  • @tvismyonlyfriend
    @tvismyonlyfriend 7 місяців тому +2

    5:05 as a Canadian since birth I relate with this one Dear

  • @oscarinterprises
    @oscarinterprises 6 місяців тому

    I love the touch of existential dread injected in the last minute. 10/10

  • @conforzo
    @conforzo 4 місяці тому

    I'm sorry but this video is just so wrong. You very conviniently skipped the one who brought Idealism and Materialism together, namely Hegel (who btw was unsure whether to call his philosohpy Idealism because the connotations of anti-realism "Everything is in your mind duuude" it had. He could just as well have called it Realism). He's the one who actually solved Kants noumenal phenomenal split. It was the primary problem in philosophy, the presuppositional divide of either starting philosophy with the material substance, atom, or monad, and the subjective intuition, God, Cogito, I etc. The problem was that no one quite understood Hegel and therefore the future after him just continued in the same vain of either putting material or the human mind as primary.

  • @terrifictomm
    @terrifictomm 6 місяців тому

    classical philosophy asked the question, "What is the secret of the grail? Who does it serve?"
    Personalty was the source and the end of philosophy.
    Rationalist philosophy turns the question into a statement: "The Grail holds no secrets. The Grail merely exists. It has no purpose beyond what it is doing now."

  • @kaihaupt8258
    @kaihaupt8258 3 місяці тому

    Resurrection of Philosophie is coming to its core: WHO am I? - Master Eckhardt and Vedanta are coming up

  • @OneLine122
    @OneLine122 6 місяців тому

    It's a peculiar take, never thought of it.
    I think Luther killed it. He rejected it, preferring faith alone. It's that simple. Then Kant followed suit and created rationality divorced from reality. Then it branched out. Some followed in that vein, like Hegel, Marx and a few others. Others went romantic and cared mostly about feelings and rejected reason, so Nietzsche is one of them. Then others that stayed more philosophical simply became scientists so stuck to measurement. Einstein is peculiar himself. Highly idealistic, he also denied objective reality in order to replace it with objective mathematical formula. Freud is highly romantic, wanting to liberate the libido. Jung, another idealist and romantic at the same time.
    So it started with Luther and they never came back to reality and reason.

  • @brunosirigado
    @brunosirigado 6 місяців тому

    Are we really talking about french, German, Russian etc philosophers?
    They were all Jews.
    They didn't reflect the ideas or culture of an entire nation, except their own.

  • @hendrikmaking8751
    @hendrikmaking8751 Місяць тому

    The best content

  • @ElonMuskrat-my8jy
    @ElonMuskrat-my8jy 5 місяців тому

    There's a book by George Santayana called Egotism in German Philosophy. He makes the claim that Kant, Hegel, Fichte, Nietzsche and Schopenhauer were motivated by egotism which he defines as subjectivity in thought and willfulness in morals. He says German philosophy is "a spirit of uncompromising self-assertion and metaphysical conceit." In other words, they were motivated by vainglory instead of love for the truth.

    • @Yamanoteline30
      @Yamanoteline30 3 місяці тому +1

      Truth is subjective.

    • @Yamanoteline30
      @Yamanoteline30 3 місяці тому

      "Motivated by Egotism." As opposed to what? Altruism in Filipino political culture that discourages theoretical knowledge?

    • @ElonMuskrat-my8jy
      @ElonMuskrat-my8jy 3 місяці тому

      @@Yamanoteline30 You made an objective statement about truth. You contradicted and refuted yourself.

    • @dohlecarnett1866
      @dohlecarnett1866 Місяць тому

      That seems an equivalent of click bait. Sure, these dudes might like to read and hear themselves but to boil all these guys just down to that is just simply not very insightful.

    • @ElonMuskrat-my8jy
      @ElonMuskrat-my8jy Місяць тому

      @@dohlecarnett1866 Sounds like cope for not engaging with the text or the ideas he put forth.

  • @arminulrich2319
    @arminulrich2319 6 місяців тому

    11:02 The Chinese did it long before. Wiki:
    "Bi Sheng (Chinese: 畢昇; 972-1051 AD) was a Song dynasty Chinese artisan, engineer, and inventor of the world's first movable type technology. Bi Sheng's system used fired clay tiles, one for each Chinese character,and was invented between 1039 and 1048. Printing was one of the Four Great Inventions. Because Bi was a commoner, not an educated person, little is known about his life besides this invention."

  • @BORANATRAVEL
    @BORANATRAVEL 7 місяців тому +4

    English too killed it...the anglo-saxons

    • @MerhabaMuhtesem
      @MerhabaMuhtesem 7 місяців тому +1

      agree 😁

    • @philosophemes
      @philosophemes 6 місяців тому +3

      Well said. Analytic Philosophy is a symptom of the death of philosophy.

  • @hiberniancaveman8970
    @hiberniancaveman8970 6 місяців тому +3

    From the concluding paragraph of _The Barbarism of Berlin_ by G.K.Chesterton (1984):
    “In these slight notes I have suggested the principal strong points of the Prussian character. … There is an ominous and almost monstrous parallel between the position of their over-rated philosophers and of their comparatively under-rated soldiers. For what their professors call roads of progress are really routes of escape.”

    • @terrifictomm
      @terrifictomm 6 місяців тому +1

      I would like to see that thesis expanded upon. Unfortunately, I find Chesterton a very hard slog, as through a slough.

  • @ludmilaivanova1603
    @ludmilaivanova1603 7 місяців тому +6

    @10:35 to say hat religion did not change for thousands of years is not right. There were so many sects in christianity that the hierarchy called meetings to define the dogmats. And still today there are many churches with different readings of the Bible or other religious sources. Also, we have seen recently how the Christianity is changing its teaching accroding to new understanding of gender, as an example.
    Very interestng lecture. Thanks.

    • @andjelabozic2317
      @andjelabozic2317 6 місяців тому

      It's not that Christianity is changing, it's that people with their own(wrong) opinions have infiltrated the church, even started their own. It is a blasphemy indeed.

  • @battragon
    @battragon 6 місяців тому +1

    "QuOte" .
    Nietzsche wasn't dumb. (For his time.)

  • @Sachie465
    @Sachie465 6 місяців тому

    I'm beginning to doubt that 'why' questions can be answered rationally. In the second half of my life I understand why people turn to religion.

  • @yogikarl
    @yogikarl 6 місяців тому

    The easterners are not asking ? why and how ? They are asking : what and how . . . I learnt that all philosophers agree '''''never asks why'''' you will end up with convoluted karmic low sense

  • @willforest5302
    @willforest5302 6 місяців тому

    Id love for you to look into Edmund Burke, Michael Oakshotte, J.R.R Tolkien and so on, and make a similar analysis of english traditionalism or as europeams might say English philosophical laziness.

  • @arminulrich2319
    @arminulrich2319 6 місяців тому

    4:47 This is why many are so scared about climate change here.

  • @Kannot2023
    @Kannot2023 6 місяців тому

    Gerlan is a more analitical language. If you don't speak precise you are not understand.

  • @guvercinsiirleri
    @guvercinsiirleri 6 місяців тому +1

    Lütfen Türkçe altyazıları tüm videolarınızda yapın.Hiçbir şey anlamıyorum.

  • @robertl4522
    @robertl4522 6 місяців тому

    If the universe is truly infinite then the possibility of 2 copies of yourself meeting each other is a certainty.
    I, for one, believe in the cosmic onion model. The core is a never ending big bang, the layers are universes that grow beneath each other - the newer pushing the older ever further away from the cosmic forge. And the last layer are the universes that rot away into nothingness.

  • @RedSntDK
    @RedSntDK 6 місяців тому

    4:47 "Cold climate" theory sounds a lot like Schopenhauer's race theory doesn't it?
    " The highest civilization and culture, apart from the ancient Hindus and Egyptians, are found exclusively among the white races; and even with many dark peoples, the ruling caste, or race, is fairer in colour than the rest, and has, therefore, evidently immigrated, for example, the Brahmins, the Inca, and the rulers of the South Sea Islands. All this is due to the fact that necessity is the mother of invention, because those tribes that emigrated early to the north, and there gradually became white, had to develop all their intellectual powers, and invent and perfect all the arts in their struggle with need, want, and misery, which, in their many forms, were brought about by the climate. This they had to do to make up for the parsimony of nature, and out of it all came their high civilization. "
    In fact, there are many such old fashioned scientific racism theories.

  • @zexalinishere
    @zexalinishere 7 місяців тому +3

    It’s no kidding they thought they were the master race eh

    • @joeywantstoplay
      @joeywantstoplay 6 місяців тому +1

      They have ultimately proven themselves to be. Even though, that whole concept was attributed upon them, by the perpetual victims/parasites. There was, & still remain an amazing abundance of genius in the German culture, that was ripe for pilfering, by the plagiarizing pretenders who plague our species prolifically. @zexalinishere cheers!

    • @philosophemes
      @philosophemes 6 місяців тому

      There's a lot that going around these days :)

    • @someone-ke4qj
      @someone-ke4qj 6 місяців тому +1

      The fruits of believing macro evolution

  • @janolosnero325
    @janolosnero325 6 місяців тому +1

    Human are machines and we too selfish to give control to AI

  • @dylanclark9903
    @dylanclark9903 6 місяців тому

    Please do something on Hemingway. Or Mirakami. Both are rich in the philosophies you discuss. I know you like to stick with dead European authors (you have good taste), But I would love to see something different.
    Keep up the good work!

  • @ArthurAgamenon_
    @ArthurAgamenon_ 6 місяців тому

    I tend to see it more in terms of how knowledge is no longer part of our cultural and philosophical dimension, and has been reduced solely to an instrumental use to achieve specific ends (things like obtaining more profit or saving energy and automating processes). This is the biggest problem I see with the result of the split in knowledge and instrumentalization, we are depriving human beings of humanity; people don't think anymore, academics (the greatest minds in the world) are not thinkers, but just employees of some billionaire. I don't think that technology will take our place, but that human beings will be destroying themselves before that. After all, technology is an extension of man and represents nothing more than our relationship with the world (in a very Heideggerian sense). How can there be a relationship between man and the world without man? There is not. When the Enlightenment replaced myths and superstitions, they put something in their place; But if we continue as we are, will we even be able to put anything in our place?

  • @AGWittmann
    @AGWittmann Місяць тому

    So we just dont let the AI learn german?

  • @Ankit..550
    @Ankit..550 6 місяців тому

    Kindly upload Evolution of Western Political Thoughts

  • @outofoblivionproductions4015
    @outofoblivionproductions4015 7 місяців тому +1

    I liked your analysis- from why to how, from God's essence/existence to human thinking. I would say the change started before the Reformation with the Nominalists who in later iterations educated Luther. Perhaps there has always been a dead streak in Philosophy. However, with the rise of agnosticism and atheism,, the killing of truth has become second nature.

    • @miguelatkinson
      @miguelatkinson 6 місяців тому +1

      How does the rise of atheism or agnosticism has anything to do with the "the killing of truth has become second nature"

  • @closegripbenchpress489
    @closegripbenchpress489 6 місяців тому

    you explained plato's theory like it was jung's

  • @jamesgale2147
    @jamesgale2147 6 місяців тому

    so once the theorists having given way to the analysts having given way to the scientists having given way to the robots still need redemption as characterized by their need to know and understand have only their knees left to fall on; I believe help thou my unbelief

  • @comptonGANGBANG
    @comptonGANGBANG 6 місяців тому

    Analytical philosophy started at least since Socrates for sure you cant say that Aristotle was not fully Analytical he literally created Aristotelian logic for fucks sake the fundamentals of analysis to this day.

  • @acswu2617
    @acswu2617 6 місяців тому

    What is philosophy ?

  • @chrislusk3497
    @chrislusk3497 6 місяців тому

    What is that painting that appears at 4:30?

  • @Rico-Suave_
    @Rico-Suave_ 6 місяців тому

    Great video, thank you very much , note to self(nts) watched all in it 21:30

  • @jimvonkropsberg399
    @jimvonkropsberg399 6 місяців тому +2

    Great German Stuff

  • @manduvaprasadrao5391
    @manduvaprasadrao5391 6 місяців тому +1

    The link between the German climate, German language and philosophy was interesting though far fetched. They invented dangerous weapons and dangerous people like Hitler and his shameless supporters and they have laid the foundations for a non-human robotic world. Analytical thinking has proven dangerous..World needs synthetic thinking of Hindus expressed in their most famous prescription Vasudeka kutumbam (one world) and sarvejena sukh😊inobhavantu ( May all people be happy)But abstract scientific thinking that led to computers which can create automated world is not from Germans.

    • @Exgrmbl
      @Exgrmbl 6 місяців тому

      english and americans were much more influential in that regard than the germans

  • @yogikarl
    @yogikarl 6 місяців тому

    Don't say Kaan't . Say Kant , like in : but

  • @dusabefabrice3104
    @dusabefabrice3104 7 місяців тому +2

    i like Russian Literature.

  • @ahmedmahmud4238
    @ahmedmahmud4238 6 місяців тому +6

    These type of videos are stupid. You ought to focus on the cultural background, economic infrastructure and general cultural metaphysics that fostered such enthusiasm for philosophy in the German speaking world, as opposed to "Basketball" or "Rock music", then you will be closer to exposing something closer to truth. Everything you said about Germans are exterior and post-facto generalizations, with no predictive power. The narrative is kinda stupid.

    • @terrifictomm
      @terrifictomm 6 місяців тому

      You I've got to be a liberal, a leftist.
      You always think everybody should do exactly what you think is best. You can't stand for other people to have ideas that you don't control.
      Go away.

    • @terrifictomm
      @terrifictomm 6 місяців тому

      Oh! Or make your room damn videos and see how many views you get. Find out if anyone wants to listen to you and your drivel.

  • @narasimhabhagavatula8360
    @narasimhabhagavatula8360 7 місяців тому +1

    Material mind became life cold hot humid religions.

  • @motivationbeast3636
    @motivationbeast3636 6 місяців тому

    what is the name of painting in 13:50?

    • @prathameshthorat8326
      @prathameshthorat8326 6 місяців тому +1

      Its Casper David Friedrich's "wanderer above sea of fog"

  • @thepurplevelvet
    @thepurplevelvet 6 місяців тому

    Everyone blames Germans but you should be blaming ashkenazi Jews

  • @KunDziki
    @KunDziki 6 місяців тому

    19:12 I disect the frog and then laugh wildly 😅 Just being autistic Polish 🤣

  • @K4-02
    @K4-02 6 місяців тому

    Böhmi xD (more like BöhmÄ)

  • @account2871
    @account2871 6 місяців тому

    Rejection of God is hell

  • @ludmilaivanova1603
    @ludmilaivanova1603 7 місяців тому +1

    iI am struck by the thought that philosophy is dead. What about Isaiah Berlin, well known as a philosopher? Maybe the topic philosophers work on today is different, more complex? Say, how a human today thinks of war, justice and the like. Instead of chairs?
    Another interesting thought is why some European nations have success in art and music and others in industries. But if we take a look at Russia we will see that after the October Revolution the Russians became great in industry, and art. may be there is something more influential than just national features?

    • @ahmedmahmud4238
      @ahmedmahmud4238 6 місяців тому

      If you made a video you would be closer to the truth.

    • @terrifictomm
      @terrifictomm 6 місяців тому

      Are you actually claiming that communism produced anything of value over its entire 70 years? Unless you are speaking of the work of dissidents like Alexander Solzhenitsyn, you're speaking nonsense.
      Communism literally destroyed the Ukrainian bread basket and produced a famine that killed tens of millions Ukrainians and Russians. And we don't have time to talk about any of the disasters that followed that culminated in Chernobyl.

    • @ludmilaivanova1603
      @ludmilaivanova1603 6 місяців тому

      @@terrifictomm I am sorry, are you familiar with the world history of 20 century?

    • @terrifictomm
      @terrifictomm 6 місяців тому

      @@ludmilaivanova1603
      Are you?

    • @terrifictomm
      @terrifictomm 6 місяців тому

      @@ludmilaivanova1603
      UA-cam failed to post my initial response. Let me try again.
      Are you?
      Tell me what great achievements in industry, technology, the humanities, or even in agriculture the Soviet Union can lay claim to.
      Oh! And that they didn't steal from the West.

  • @CaliMDiini
    @CaliMDiini 7 місяців тому +1

    I heard that Kant was Scottish, so he was the cousin of David Hume.

  • @user-nd6ku6yb9w
    @user-nd6ku6yb9w 6 місяців тому

    Sausage people

  • @benquinneyiii7941
    @benquinneyiii7941 7 місяців тому +1

    5 minutes early

  • @DjTahoun
    @DjTahoun 7 місяців тому +2

    🌹😇🌹

  • @FriedrichNietzsche-kq2hh
    @FriedrichNietzsche-kq2hh 6 місяців тому

    Funily, Germany also killed music. Because Wagners was the best, nobody has ever came near to him. That's why Pop and Rock music were made.

  • @JaysonT1
    @JaysonT1 6 місяців тому +4

    The Chinese were far better at philosophy and long before the first Germans knew what is was.

    • @joeywantstoplay
      @joeywantstoplay 6 місяців тому +1

      Let me guess, you are chinese? @JaysonT1 you clones stole all of your philosophy from Japan and India.

    • @bennaarsongidi
      @bennaarsongidi 6 місяців тому +1

      Evidence?

    • @terrifictomm
      @terrifictomm 6 місяців тому

      Define "better."

  • @PravdaSeed
    @PravdaSeed 5 місяців тому

    ⭐💯💓💯⭐
    🌀🌍🌀

  • @Hammudiii
    @Hammudiii 7 місяців тому +15

    Karl Marx is not German.

    • @ChristianSt97
      @ChristianSt97 7 місяців тому +20

      he is

    • @blist14ant
      @blist14ant 7 місяців тому +9

      Jewish German

    • @Inconscientious
      @Inconscientious 7 місяців тому +4

      He's an authentic German.

    • @ComptonFunk
      @ComptonFunk 7 місяців тому +15

      As a German. He is a German.

    • @MerhabaMuhtesem
      @MerhabaMuhtesem 7 місяців тому +8

      ​@@blist14anthe is an athetist so he is not Jewish, at least not traditionally.