Zahid from Pakistan I m apply visa one year finland please reply me what is the position in finland about construction work can I easily get job in finland
I don't know if you have already, could you make a video about the verb suffix -ava, such as, minun on noustava aamulla aikaisin, and how that differs from pitää and täytyä. Kiitos.
I actually have a few examples here: ua-cam.com/video/2HFiLz_sbKk/v-deo.htmlsi=gKxXvYB4FcxIINEt It's a structure that can be used more formally than pitää and täytyä, but it is definitely used in spoken Finnish, too. I actually have a whole course on the participles (tehtävä, tekemä, tehnyt...) in my Finnish language learning membership if you're interested in more advanced grammar like this: finkingcapclub.com/
Do you have apps or anything that can enrolled to you, and how much the monthly ope hahaha.😅 You're such a good teacher, it's easy to understand because you explained everything.🙏
I have a ton of courses at www.finkingcapclub.com, subscription service/membership for 19,90€/month. My UA-cam is just a fraction of what I have there. 👩🏼🏫
Tosi tosi tosi tosi tosi iso apua, minä yritä ja käydä tämä jokä päivää nyt, kiitos loistavaa opettaja. Kysymys sulle, asuitko sinä Englantissa? Sulla on Englanti accenti kun sä puhua Englanniksi... 🇫🇮🇬🇧🇫🇮
Joo! Mä joko asuin Englannissa tai työskentelin brittiläisessä firmassa 8 vuotta, joten melkein kaikki mun elämässä tapahtui englanniksi piiiiiitkään. 😀
Good day ma, ma from the verb used in the lesson for example, you use "be" which is "olla" but in the sentence what am seeing is olen instead of olla . Be, been, being as English
Hi! Olla is just the basic form (dictionary form) of the verb, and the verb changes according to the subject of the sentence. Just like the English verb "be" becomes (I) "am", the Finnish verb "olla" (to be) becomes "olen" (I am).
Actually, it is probably to do with how the pronunciation developed - if you try to form the past tense by using the sounds y and i next to each other, it'll still very easily start to sound like "kävin". I hope this helps!
I am confused as to when to use ajoissa and aikaisin. You used both in same or almost same situation. I can't tell the difference. Could you please explain it?
I believe you're talking about the following example sentences: "Minä menin nukkumaan aikaisin" (I went to sleep early) and "Minä lähdin ajoissa" (I left on time). You can use both words in either of those sentences, but there's usually a difference: "aikaisin" is more likely to mean "early" that just simply means whatever is early to the speaker. For example, if I say "minä lähdin aikaisin" could mean that I started my journey at a time that, to me, feels early. Leaving my house at 5am is early. But if I say "minä lähdin ajoissa", I refer to leaving at a time that leaves me plenty of time to make the trip and not be late for something, like work. So ajoissa (on time) is usually tied to some kind of a schedule that needs to be followed. It's different from aikaisin (early), which I guess can be more subjective: Hän oppi lukemaan aikaisin (she learned to read early). That's it in a nutshell, let me know if you have more questions!
@@learnfinnishwithfinkingcap thanks for the explanation. Let's say my school or job starts at 9am and I got to school/job at 8am or anything earlier than 9am. Can I say, tulin kouluun/töihin ajoissa or tulin kouluun/töihin aikaisin? Or are they both correct?. Another instance: let's say my appointment is today at 10am and I am texting the person with whom I have the appointment at 9am or any time earlier than 10am to inform him/her that I can't make it to the appointment. Do say anteeksi että ilmoittanut aikaisin or anteeksi en ilmoittanut ajoissa? like i could have notified him/her yesterday or even days befor
They're both correct. Tulin ajoissa basically can carry the meaning "I was not late for work", and tulin aikaisin just means you got there relatively early, not so much emphasizing that you didn't miss a deadline. Those words can be a little blurry depending on who's speaking, but if you go by those principles you should be fine. Ajoissa = "not late", whereas aikaisin can't mean that. Here's another useful expression with aikaisin: liian aikaisin = too early Älä soita minulle liian aikaisin! = Don't call me too early!
Moi! Oletko opiskellut suomea itsenäisesti vai käytkö suomen kurssilla? Kiva kun kommentoit, ja mukava kuulla että mun videot on hyödyllisiä. Onnea opintoihin! 🙂
Verb Tuoda. Is it normal that words turn in genetive after that verb? Why is it "toin pullon viiniä" and not "toin pulloa viiniä". The same question applies to the other sentence.
Glad you asked! Yes, it's normal. "Pullon" is the object here, and the object rules apply to that word. "Viiniä" isn't the core noun of the object, although it's part of the noun phrase, "pullo viiniä", so we'll keep "viiniä" in the partitive regardless. "Pullon" requires the genitive (or the n-accusative according to some textbooks or teachers) because it's the object in the sentence AND none of the rules regarding the partitive object apply. Negative sentence would be: "En tuonut pulloa viiniä". Does that help? Thanks for the comment!
@@learnfinnishwithfinkingcapI wasn't the one that asked the question. I thought I understood your explanation until you made pulo partitve in the third to your last sentence. I have now gone from 100% understanding to 10%
If you want to know one of the sentences in Finnish puhekieli, leave a comment below and I'll help you out!
Joo, kiitos.
Joo kiitos
joo. haluan 😊
Zahid from Pakistan I m apply visa one year finland please reply me what is the position in finland about construction work can I easily get job in finland
Please if u don't mind u have Whatsup nombr
Kiitos ☺️
Haluan puhekieli ❤
Mitä haluat oppia puhekielestä? Kiitos kommentista!
Kiitos paljon kaikista opestusvideoistasi. Olen todella oppinut siitä .
Kiva kuulla. Kiitos kun kommentoit! 🙂
Kiitos paljon ope ❤
Ole hyvä!
Kiitos niin paljon ope!🤩
Mä opin taas uusia sanoja tänään.
Kun oppii joka päivä pari uutta sanaa, pääsee jo pitkälle! 👍🏼
Awesome video! Thank you so much.
You're very welcome! 🙂
Kiitos paljon Ope
Ole hyvä! 🙂
Kiitos paljon, really grateful for these valuable vids 🧡🙏
Ei kestä!
Kiitos opettaja!
Ei kestä. Kiitos kommentista! 🙂
Mahtavaa ope, sä käytit paljon verbejä ja se on helppo ymmärtää😊❤
Kiva kuulla! Nämä esimerkit kannattaa opetella, koska ne ovat tosi yleisiä.
kyllä ope, ja se auttaa meitä paljon erityisesti vasta aloitimme suomen kielen 😊. Kiitos paljon avustasi. 🙏
I don't know if you have already, could you make a video about the verb suffix -ava, such as, minun on noustava aamulla aikaisin, and how that differs from pitää and täytyä. Kiitos.
I actually have a few examples here: ua-cam.com/video/2HFiLz_sbKk/v-deo.htmlsi=gKxXvYB4FcxIINEt
It's a structure that can be used more formally than pitää and täytyä, but it is definitely used in spoken Finnish, too.
I actually have a whole course on the participles (tehtävä, tekemä, tehnyt...) in my Finnish language learning membership if you're interested in more advanced grammar like this: finkingcapclub.com/
@@learnfinnishwithfinkingcap kiitos
Do you have apps or anything that can enrolled to you, and how much the monthly ope hahaha.😅 You're such a good teacher, it's easy to understand because you explained everything.🙏
I have a ton of courses at www.finkingcapclub.com, subscription service/membership for 19,90€/month. My UA-cam is just a fraction of what I have there. 👩🏼🏫
Vau, kiitos ope, se koulusta hyvälta!
Mä tykkään siitä ope!🤩
Kiitos paljon ❤ I have a question, Minun pitää nukkua NUKKUA have double k It calls kpt change. Why wasn't it changed to one k?
It doesn't need to change because with PITÄÄ you can use the basic form, which is nukkua. 🙂
Could you please show these verbs conjugate according to other subjects. (You, we, they, he, she, it)?
Oooh, I wasn't sure if that was going to be interesting... but if I get enough comments to support this idea then I'll consider it, yes!!! 🙂
Great!!
Thanks for the comment! Glad you liked the video 😊
Tosi tosi tosi tosi tosi iso apua, minä yritä ja käydä tämä jokä päivää nyt, kiitos loistavaa opettaja. Kysymys sulle, asuitko sinä Englantissa? Sulla on Englanti accenti kun sä puhua Englanniksi... 🇫🇮🇬🇧🇫🇮
Joo! Mä joko asuin Englannissa tai työskentelin brittiläisessä firmassa 8 vuotta, joten melkein kaikki mun elämässä tapahtui englanniksi piiiiiitkään. 😀
Kiitos!😊
Ei kestä! 😊
Kiitos
Ole hyvä! 🙂
Kiitos okein paljon!!!
Ole hyvä! Ja kiitos kommenteista! 😊
Ei kestä! Kiitos kun kommentoit. 🙂
Good day ma, ma from the verb used in the lesson for example, you use "be" which is "olla" but in the sentence what am seeing is olen instead of olla . Be, been, being as English
Hi! Olla is just the basic form (dictionary form) of the verb, and the verb changes according to the subject of the sentence. Just like the English verb "be" becomes (I) "am", the Finnish verb "olla" (to be) becomes "olen" (I am).
Moi,
How did the käyn be came kävin in past tense, how it happened (y) be come (v) thank you for clarifying
It's just irregular like that! Make a note and stick it on your wall/fridge/ bathroom door because it's extremely common! 🙃 Thanks for commenting 🙂
Actually, it is probably to do with how the pronunciation developed - if you try to form the past tense by using the sounds y and i next to each other, it'll still very easily start to sound like "kävin". I hope this helps!
Kiitos
Ole hyvä, ja kiitos kommentista!
I am confused as to when to use ajoissa and aikaisin. You used both in same or almost same situation. I can't tell the difference. Could you please explain it?
I believe you're talking about the following example sentences: "Minä menin nukkumaan aikaisin" (I went to sleep early) and "Minä lähdin ajoissa" (I left on time). You can use both words in either of those sentences, but there's usually a difference: "aikaisin" is more likely to mean "early" that just simply means whatever is early to the speaker. For example, if I say "minä lähdin aikaisin" could mean that I started my journey at a time that, to me, feels early. Leaving my house at 5am is early. But if I say "minä lähdin ajoissa", I refer to leaving at a time that leaves me plenty of time to make the trip and not be late for something, like work. So ajoissa (on time) is usually tied to some kind of a schedule that needs to be followed. It's different from aikaisin (early), which I guess can be more subjective: Hän oppi lukemaan aikaisin (she learned to read early). That's it in a nutshell, let me know if you have more questions!
@@learnfinnishwithfinkingcap thanks for the explanation. Let's say my school or job starts at 9am and I got to school/job at 8am or anything earlier than 9am. Can I say, tulin kouluun/töihin ajoissa or tulin kouluun/töihin aikaisin? Or are they both correct?. Another instance: let's say my appointment is today at 10am and I am texting the person with whom I have the appointment at 9am or any time earlier than 10am to inform him/her that I can't make it to the appointment. Do say anteeksi että ilmoittanut aikaisin or anteeksi en ilmoittanut ajoissa? like i could have notified him/her yesterday or even days befor
They're both correct. Tulin ajoissa basically can carry the meaning "I was not late for work", and tulin aikaisin just means you got there relatively early, not so much emphasizing that you didn't miss a deadline. Those words can be a little blurry depending on who's speaking, but if you go by those principles you should be fine. Ajoissa = "not late", whereas aikaisin can't mean that.
Here's another useful expression with aikaisin:
liian aikaisin = too early
Älä soita minulle liian aikaisin! = Don't call me too early!
@@learnfinnishwithfinkingcap could you check the comment again, I just edited it. I added another scrnerio
Paljon kiitos. Ma yritaan puhua vahan suemea .ma ajatelen sa autan mua . Kotosin ethiophasta ja asun addis abecassa. Ma haluan menna suomeen .
Moi! Oletko opiskellut suomea itsenäisesti vai käytkö suomen kurssilla? Kiva kun kommentoit, ja mukava kuulla että mun videot on hyödyllisiä. Onnea opintoihin! 🙂
Verb Tuoda. Is it normal that words turn in genetive after that verb? Why is it "toin pullon viiniä" and not "toin pulloa viiniä". The same question applies to the other sentence.
Glad you asked! Yes, it's normal. "Pullon" is the object here, and the object rules apply to that word. "Viiniä" isn't the core noun of the object, although it's part of the noun phrase, "pullo viiniä", so we'll keep "viiniä" in the partitive regardless. "Pullon" requires the genitive (or the n-accusative according to some textbooks or teachers) because it's the object in the sentence AND none of the rules regarding the partitive object apply. Negative sentence would be: "En tuonut pulloa viiniä". Does that help? Thanks for the comment!
@@learnfinnishwithfinkingcap kiitos paljon
@@learnfinnishwithfinkingcapI wasn't the one that asked the question. I thought I understood your explanation until you made pulo partitve in the third to your last sentence. I have now gone from 100% understanding to 10%
Yes needed
Good to hear! Thanks for the comment. 😊
Opiskella