What an annoying stupid watch, but WHY?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @steelscooter
    @steelscooter Рік тому +5

    It's not a stupid name, The Gallatin Range is part of the Rockies and also a river that originates in Yellowstone. There's this thing called Google...

  • @stevew7308
    @stevew7308 4 роки тому +11

    I'd like some honesty. Next time tell us what you really think. And don't go so easy on bad watches. I really don't think this one so great.

  • @kennyburns491
    @kennyburns491 2 роки тому +5

    What a dim review , I wore this watch to work (support worker with the elderly ) all through the pandemic , it was constantly soaked with soap , hot water and anti-bac and it kept perfect time .Only change I made was to swap the original ( very nice ) leather strap for a black Timex nylon strap. My other watches are a solar G-Shock 5610 and a wee Seiko SNK , but I keep going back to the Timex . Also wandering around a back garden with it on your wrist isn`t going on an expedition !

  • @humbukkerz
    @humbukkerz 4 роки тому +10

    Emmmm, it's about as rugged as a piece of cotton wool. What a ridiculous watch lol Great review mate enjoyed the rant!

  • @7531monkey
    @7531monkey 4 роки тому +22

    To anyone searching videos on this watch, the one I bought in the USA was half the price, has different watch hands and a different strap. Its worked flawlessly for months. Not saying it will last forever but its not the crap this guy got. Im happy with it.

    • @qayyuumzaki8033
      @qayyuumzaki8033 3 роки тому +3

      My mom bought me this and it’s almost 6 years I’m still wearing it until today with no major problem at all

  • @CanadianBeachcomber
    @CanadianBeachcomber 4 роки тому +9

    Good video but you were robbed. For the money you spent, in Canada you can get a Timex Command with 200 metres WR, mineral glass, Indiglo, rubber strap and a ISO shock resistance rating (whatever that means).

  • @MrLahrbrat
    @MrLahrbrat 4 роки тому +9

    If you want a good solar watch try the Citizen Eco-Drive 200m watch much better then the Timex.

  • @BorgyManotoyOnline
    @BorgyManotoyOnline Рік тому

    I just got gallatin, problem is it works in day. When there is no sunlight, it does not work. Does this have a rechargeable battery inside? I am thinking that the battery does not store power/charge. TY

  • @sam9242
    @sam9242 4 роки тому +11

    Well, it is a Timex. Their use of the term "watch" is sometimes a little questionable. Remember their watches from the fifties and sixties where the mechanisms were riveted together? The only things I've seen that deserves some credit are their Fly Back chronographs and the Indiglo idea. For less than this you can get a number of different Vostok Amphibia models, including a GMT version and a true 24 movement, and you get a real, 200 meter water resistant, expedition watch. All powered by "The wonderful natural outdoors adventure of moving, like running from a bear."
    Greeting from Minnesota.

    • @DK-jd8bj
      @DK-jd8bj 4 роки тому

      I love indigo. Trying desperately to find a Timex indigo (or any other brand that has good backlighting) that's worth wearing. I thought I almost had it when I bought the Timex expedition shock digital with a 100m water resistance and indigo but the band is incredibly uncomfortable to wear and it's way too big (thick). 50mmx15mm.
      To be fair at Casio is doing the same thing with their watches. Most G-Shocks are way too big.

  • @rrampage36
    @rrampage36 Рік тому +1

    Even my 5 year olds toy watch bezel rotates....🤣🤣🤣

  • @oleal4258
    @oleal4258 4 роки тому +2

    You get what you pay for; Timex is not saying that it is the perfect watch for a trip of one year through Africa. It is a sport looking economic watch perfect for a non "watch aficionado" teenager that needs to get in time to his construction job, or to the school; put it into that arena, and that watch is a decent option. Just my two cents, gentlemen.

    • @Ajajambo
      @Ajajambo 2 роки тому

      Spot on mate! He seem to be knocking this timex on it's face. For sure ranting and disliking the brand and the watch.

  • @richandfuture
    @richandfuture Рік тому

    what is the watch model for the g shock ?

  • @CivilDefenceCanada
    @CivilDefenceCanada Рік тому +2

    It's a cheap, beater watch dude. This is a no frills solar watch that's not to be compared to a Rolex or things that cost 10x as much, even things 2x as much. It's great as a basic watch that could get briefly wet, is lightweight and you aren't upset if it gets lost.
    What do you recommend in the same price point with the features you want? Instead of crying, what solutions or alternatives do you recommend?

    • @watchmewithwatches
      @watchmewithwatches  Рік тому

      Nicer Solar options under £99:
      Casio AQ-S810W-1A2VEF
      Citizen BM8180-03E
      Citizen Watch Eco Drive Urban AW5005-39H
      Timex TW4B14900
      Casio G-Shock GW-M5610-1ER.
      Although some I have suggested above definitely cost more than this Timex, for relatively little more, there are so many amazing choices! (with solar)
      The Casio tough Solar for under £40 is a fabulous option for less money.
      Without solar? The titanium or full lumibrite dial Lorus field watches are awesome.
      Hope this helps.
      Regards,
      Dan

  • @captainturbo4164
    @captainturbo4164 4 роки тому +5

    Very interesting to view a truly honest review.
    I personally like the Timex brand.
    I do feel they have got the marketing wrong on this particular model.
    Great looking NATO strap👍

  • @PointlessCreativity
    @PointlessCreativity 2 роки тому +1

    I was about to buy this watch for around 90 euros. And it's very good that I came across your clip. A very honest and reliable review. I think I will choose the Casio AQ-S800W instead, which is cheaper and probably better...

    • @emdblyou
      @emdblyou Рік тому +1

      I can tell you for a fact that this Casio is amazing for the price. I actually picked mine up from a thrift store for $15, nearly in perfect condition, and it's been flawless. I've been wearing it to work, when installing hardwood floors, I've swam with it, you name it. No problem what so ever. Money well spent. I say go for it.

    • @PointlessCreativity
      @PointlessCreativity Рік тому

      @@emdblyou I fully agree. I already have this Casio and it's great. Thank you for adding your opinion and cheers!

  • @JasonTheWatchGuy
    @JasonTheWatchGuy 4 роки тому +2

    Would be nice to see how long it would hold up if you were to use it as a real beater! Congrats on 1.5k man!

  • @vem4o
    @vem4o 4 роки тому

    What color are the indexes ?

  • @StasiuZyjesz
    @StasiuZyjesz 4 роки тому

    what G-Shock model do you present at the end of the movie?

  • @colskee
    @colskee 4 роки тому +1

    ‘This watch is stupid’ LOL👍🏾😄

  • @boldmeregarden637
    @boldmeregarden637 4 роки тому +2

    I think at the usual price point most of the non solar expeditions are at they are ok value. Ive had one as a go to work watch for over 10 years that i bought because i liked the style of it before i really got into watches (mine was in fashion watch price territory of about £45) .The suede strap mutated into leather and has only just got its first crack on the reverse, so I’ve only just replaced that with a NATO. 50m WR is ok for me as is the fixed bezel. I would say 50m WR splash proof is a similar mislead as 200m non ISO dive watch. I think on some of your previous posts you have mentioned getting a more understandable WR rating system and I’m all in favour of that. It would be interesting to know how many people rotate their bezel then zero it and never use it again, and i would bet most dive watch never see a paddling pool let alone an ocean. Indiglo if its on the watch beats any lume. Marketing names do catch people out for sure but any purchaser should research first (hint the Pagani watches are nothing to do with the supercar). As for the date window it doesn’t look much smaller than the de-cyclopsed diver watches you have. Quartz is still going to be telling the correct time at the end of your two week holiday. Your reviews are great so I’m just trying to show the opposite side of the coin.

    • @watchmewithwatches
      @watchmewithwatches  4 роки тому +1

      Thanks David. I thought I would dabble in a little rant review of this watch. I got a bit carried away lol. I just think I got annoyed with the watch because it sends mixed messages, so other things about the watch end up becoming a target for ridicule and annoyance.

    • @boldmeregarden637
      @boldmeregarden637 4 роки тому

      watch me with watches its all good.Your videos are great. I actually think the bigger crime in the watch industry is the fitness tracker that has 50m WR. Most watches are bought because you like the look of them, but a fitness tracker needs the durability and WR like no other. My Withings Steel HR would steam up on any warm day (thanks for John Lewis no quibble return policy once id worked out what was happening)

    • @dajohnson4614
      @dajohnson4614 4 роки тому

      Redwing Minnesota is home to a high quality rugged boot manufacturer that is known for their hiking boots.

  • @idletime
    @idletime 4 роки тому +1

    I think I mentioned it before but I've always had an appreciation for nice watches and I always wanted to get into collecting nice interesting watches and the first thing I really bought for myself with my allowance when I was just a little kid was an early Casio calculator watch from King's department store like 30 years ago. Well when I was 16 and got my first job besides under-the-table gigs and working Summers before I was old enough to go to work part time after school making my own money and basically doing whatever I wanted to do I found myself preoccupied and busy with other things but I was always one to work hard and play even harder and that's probably why I didn't get into nicer watches until now cuz I didn't want to break them cuz I literally beat the hell out of my watches at the time. The watches of choice that never let me down, the Timex Ironman and Expedition series. I worked out on the job site from sunup to Sunset pouring concrete, siding houses, Roofing houses and a little of everything in between and I literally beat the hell out of my watches in the process and they never let me down. I also took them all over the mountains and hillsides and even diving a great number of times as well as bridge jumping amongst other things and the silly things just wouldn't quit. And then one day I finally had an iron man died on me and that was because apparently hit it so hard I cracked the housing and water got in it and toasted the module. I know some of the things they make do seem a little silly and ridiculous and I agree with you but all I can say is up until that one died on me I've never had a problem with them 😎

  • @thomasmaloney843
    @thomasmaloney843 Рік тому

    I paid 40 dollars for mine and it came with a nylon Velcro strap. It is okay, but nothing to write home about. I work in a messy foundry and what does hold up there is a G Shock or a Mud Resist.

  • @GregsThings-pl
    @GregsThings-pl 4 роки тому +1

    Ouch, Timex got roasted! You summed up pretty well the point about the expedition series. Just a mediocre design and that's all...

  • @freakydeaky2316
    @freakydeaky2316 Рік тому

    Expedition yimex watches are thin leather at best
    Just cut open an Expedition leather watch band. I'm not worried about swimming wit a leather Expedition watch band.

  • @peterspaepen2861
    @peterspaepen2861 4 роки тому +4

    😂😂first time LOL by watching a watch review hilarious super video thanks

  • @joeframo3347
    @joeframo3347 3 роки тому +1

    I agree with you I would send the watch back to Timex and get my money back you mean a lot of sense that damn watch ain't worth the hoot 🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑

  • @davemck1887
    @davemck1887 4 роки тому +1

    For Timex read tat. Timex are not what they used to be and they were never really any good anyway. Cheep and disposable, the Bic razor of the watch world. You be careful on those expeditions Dan.😁

    • @watchmewithwatches
      @watchmewithwatches  4 роки тому +1

      I know what you mean, they can look really nice, but don't always feel robust. I will keep my g shock for when I wing suit through mountain ranges and land in the ocean where i fight off angry sharks.

  • @DerekEvans1013
    @DerekEvans1013 2 роки тому

    You convinced me to cancel my order of this watch. I went to the Expedition Scout which has the indiglo face...I literally just canceled the order lol

  • @anthonyjarrad141
    @anthonyjarrad141 2 роки тому

    I got one of these few years back on sale, $37 so not worth it, gave it to a friend who works in the field to him to destroy it!

  • @infinitigjj6779
    @infinitigjj6779 3 роки тому

    That is a good expedition watch to go to Las Vegas strip, restaurant hopping, doing shopping groceries or outlet mall to buy some stuffs. Timex should put expedition-indoor instead of outdooor

    • @watchmewithwatches
      @watchmewithwatches  3 роки тому

      Lol! Very good idea 💡

    • @5stardave
      @5stardave 3 роки тому

      Actually it does quite well in the Montana forests. My Redwing leather boots perform well too. It is definitely an outdoor watch. Until someone has actually worn the watch for 6 months, a review is trivial at best.

    • @watchmewithwatches
      @watchmewithwatches  3 роки тому

      @@5stardave true. But it's hard reviewing something in the mountains of Surrey.

  • @5stardave
    @5stardave 3 роки тому +1

    Expedition is a brand name.

  • @markharrison8231
    @markharrison8231 4 роки тому

    Great review! I have a Timex chrono and it’s rubbish! I also have that G Shock in solar powered form which is brilliant out here in the UAE where we have an abundance of sunshine to power it, it’s been in the pool, in the sea, dropped in the sand and still absolutely fine, now that is an expedition watch!

    • @D3ZG1978
      @D3ZG1978 Рік тому

      It doesn’t need sunshine just a light source 😅

  • @alexair1
    @alexair1 3 роки тому +1

    One more option flew off my list... Thank you!

  • @gigatronicdeth
    @gigatronicdeth 2 роки тому

    Timex is an entry level brand. Gingers have no soul.

  • @freakydeaky2316
    @freakydeaky2316 Рік тому

    If you like the watch then buy it. If you don't then dint pull the trigger on that one.

  • @parrotbrand2782
    @parrotbrand2782 4 роки тому +1

    The for-display-only bezel is really disappointing because there are cheaper watches with functioning bezels.
    But i won't fault the 50m water resistance. Many watches have 50m water resistance. I have taken them swimming and showering without any issues whatsoever. It is definitely not a dive watch. The expedition can include jumping into a waterfall but should not include scuba diving.
    Recently i bought a very cheap Casio watch with a display only bezel too. It cost only $20 and has 50m water resistance. I am more than happy going swimming or doing anything with water. I will buy another one if water leaks in.

  • @jacksparrow2000
    @jacksparrow2000 4 роки тому

    Funny review! Liked it. But you are correct about the Expedition name! I got this the last week and it's slowing down a minute every day! Looks like a scam too.

  • @joeframo3347
    @joeframo3347 3 роки тому +1

    Hello to my countrymen hey mate you did a great interview on this watch thank you very much you're absolutely right about leather if you're going on an expedition why would you wear a leather you're absolutely right thank you for sharing this video I subscribed your channel cheerio 👍🖐️🤑😃😎🤠

  • @joecachia2
    @joecachia2 3 роки тому

    Expedition watch without a Screw-down crown ???? Looks nice mind you, but too expensive for those rubbish specs. And I dont even mind the strap as I just have loads of Natos anyway . And it does not even have backlight. I would get an Amphibia for less than that , without backlight ans still have a serious watch.
    For me , Timex are only useful to sleep with , cause they have an excellent Indiglo backlight , when they do . I have one them and only wear it in bed.

    • @watchmewithwatches
      @watchmewithwatches  3 роки тому

      I agree. Just saw a video showing an amphibia in a pressure test chamber. It took 80bar (800m depth) before it stopped working. Wow!

    • @joecachia2
      @joecachia2 3 роки тому

      @@watchmewithwatches Yes I think I saw that today too... I have 2 amphibias , my only gripe with them is the non clicking bezel ( I heard under pressure it does not move but Im not a diver ) . Either way I love them

    • @watchmewithwatches
      @watchmewithwatches  3 роки тому

      @@joecachia2 at least there are never any alignment issues!

  • @ofirpanhi3525
    @ofirpanhi3525 2 роки тому

    Well, what would you expect from a US$42 watch? it is not comparable with a US$300 watch, now is it...?

    • @watchmewithwatches
      @watchmewithwatches  2 роки тому

      A lorus lumibrite and countless casios are better than this for less.

  • @kevinhooper2787
    @kevinhooper2787 4 роки тому +1

    Made for mountin’ men mountin’ women .

  • @michaelhenninger5287
    @michaelhenninger5287 3 роки тому

    SB footwear is the company that provides Red Wing their boot leather.

  • @Rob-on5tz
    @Rob-on5tz 3 роки тому

    That's ok i'll stick with my Rolex "'Explorer". ;-)

  • @bac135
    @bac135 4 роки тому

    50m is a stupid watch for adventure

  • @MeTaLISaWeSoMe95
    @MeTaLISaWeSoMe95 2 роки тому

    Try the Expedition North series. Much better than this thing.

  • @luiswalterr8734
    @luiswalterr8734 6 місяців тому

    lo tengo desde hace 4 años, bastante confiable, buena apariencia, por el precio es bastante recomendable.

  • @gregorybarry4564
    @gregorybarry4564 4 роки тому

    £70 is a lot of money for that!

  • @tayfunakkar6811
    @tayfunakkar6811 Рік тому

    teşekkür ederim... benim için çok faydalı oldu...

  • @flaS2k
    @flaS2k 4 роки тому

    Takes a lickin’ and keeps on Tickin’......

  • @adamtorres109
    @adamtorres109 3 роки тому

    Gallatin is the name of a mountain range in Montana.

    • @watchmewithwatches
      @watchmewithwatches  3 роки тому

      Thats cool, thanks for sharing! Have you seen their new solar powered expedition with sapphire crystal and even comes in a 36mm case size!

  • @73av8r5
    @73av8r5 4 роки тому

    I have a scout that I like. This one has a really cheap look to it. 🤨

  • @poeunphoung9862
    @poeunphoung9862 3 роки тому

    I just bought one...I like it for no reason really.🤓😂😎

    • @watchmewithwatches
      @watchmewithwatches  3 роки тому +1

      It had a charm to its design, but thats where my interest stopped in the end sadly!

  • @freakydeaky2316
    @freakydeaky2316 Рік тому

    I dont like the galatian

  • @Zenned-Out
    @Zenned-Out 3 роки тому

    Expedition to the rubbish bin

    • @watchmewithwatches
      @watchmewithwatches  3 роки тому

      Yes! Have you seek their newer (more expensive) offerings? Much much better.

  • @razahasnain6342
    @razahasnain6342 4 роки тому +1

    Great fun review 🤣

  • @salty_terminal_civilian5374
    @salty_terminal_civilian5374 3 роки тому

    Timex has nice designs but they are such shit.

  • @carlosalvarez6552
    @carlosalvarez6552 2 роки тому

    Con ese precio no se consigue nada más, hay que ser realistas, sería estupido y hasta una estafa si costara lo mismo que un reloj táctico de Casio o citizen, me parece que este rejol cumple con lo que se espera por su precio.

  • @Ajajambo
    @Ajajambo 2 роки тому

    I am sorry but this review is purely slaggjng off the brand and the watch. When you pay that little nobody expect top notch watch. I can see the date window without an issue ans don't need a telescope. Also, the lume on this so called mediocre watch by others has better lume then some Cssio Edifice that cost £200! Each entitled to their opinion.

    • @watchmewithwatches
      @watchmewithwatches  2 роки тому

      I agree, I did at the time feel this watch was mildly dissapointing and went on a rant!

    • @Ajajambo
      @Ajajambo 2 роки тому

      @@watchmewithwatches fair enough. I am all up for a good bargain and when certain products don't deserve the praise it's ok to let other know about it. Appreciate the honest response 👌

  • @rzm8593
    @rzm8593 4 роки тому +1

    Lol

  • @luiswalterr8734
    @luiswalterr8734 6 місяців тому

    el niño llora jajaja, baby lloron

  • @romybuenaventura3133
    @romybuenaventura3133 2 роки тому

    the flaw with your review is you did not even test the watch and just give your assumption opinion base on the looks and not performance. shame shame shame

    • @watchmewithwatches
      @watchmewithwatches  2 роки тому

      Walk of shame into the mountains to test it? Off I gooooooo!

    • @romybuenaventura3133
      @romybuenaventura3133 2 роки тому

      @@watchmewithwatches so how did it perform for two months of testing?

    • @watchmewithwatches
      @watchmewithwatches  2 роки тому

      @ROMY BUENAVENTURA I take it all back. Its amazing.

  • @peterclarke3990
    @peterclarke3990 4 роки тому

    I've never had a Timex watch that didn't get scratched within the first couple of weeks. They damage far too easily cos they're cheap plastic.

    • @watchmewithwatches
      @watchmewithwatches  4 роки тому

      Some are ok, and some are not. Ive got two more timex coming to see how some are actually better for being abused than others!

  • @KeljaSamiNation
    @KeljaSamiNation 4 роки тому

    Groovy