Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Leica Q2 First Impressions Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 бер 2019
  • This week Chris and Jordan take the new Leica Q2 for a spin, and while most of us in the Northern Hemisphere are welcoming spring, they head even farther north than usual to visit ice castles. Because #Canada.
    Available to Purchase At: fave.co/3y1kty7
    Special thanks to the Edmonton Ice Castle!
    www.icecastles....
    Music provided by Beatsuite.com
    www.beatsuite.com
    -----------------------
    DPReview.com is the world's biggest digital camera review website. Welcome to our UA-cam channel! Subscribe for new feature videos, reviews, interviews and more.
    Discover the world's most in-depth digital camera reviews at www.dpreview.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 479

  • @shonen84
    @shonen84 5 років тому +308

    My heart stopped when Chris “dried” that camera 😅

    • @bird271828
      @bird271828 5 років тому +3

      Heh heh. Mine too. I could never do that to a Leica.

    • @mavfan1
      @mavfan1 5 років тому +3

      M D wrong

    • @BlownMacTruck
      @BlownMacTruck 5 років тому +4

      Who cares? It’s not like you or dpreview paid for that camera.

    • @lewispark4838
      @lewispark4838 4 роки тому +2

      Ikr? I almost shit myself

    • @luchinooliveros2469
      @luchinooliveros2469 3 роки тому

      @M D every digital camera is an advanced electronic box.

  • @rmvsintheta
    @rmvsintheta 5 років тому +29

    Love how you guys have always made balanced reviews, and this is no exception. Nice to know that there are still reviewers out there who can promote cameras without selling out the consumer! 👍

  • @officerockstar
    @officerockstar Рік тому +3

    I really appreciate the 'auto-focus on kids' highlight since this is the most challenging 'real-world' scenario that not enough camera reviews cover. It's the most important for me as a dad of two. Thanks again.

  • @bird271828
    @bird271828 5 років тому +45

    Wow. These ice castles look magical.

  • @geraldmonger1921
    @geraldmonger1921 5 років тому +20

    Some years ago I was hired to photograph a (important) persons fathers 75th birthday party in their huge mansion. I came equipped with my Canon cameras but was informed that the (important) person would prefer me to use their Leica cameras as my Canon system was not good enough. I didn’t argue but as soon as the (important) person left the building to attend a meeting ( which was very soon) I went back to using my Canons. When I came back to show the pictures not only could he not tell the difference but insisted that the change of cameras to Leica had made a vast difference. I think that says it all!

    • @SMGJohn
      @SMGJohn 5 років тому +1

      These are the same kind of morons who claim iPhone cured their cancer or Tesla cars saves penguins.

    • @HAlariousInc
      @HAlariousInc 4 роки тому

      SMGJohn Nope, because there aren’t actually people who say that. You’ve got it backwards.
      Last time I checked, there were people complaining that phones and electric cars were the ones causing cancer.

  • @lcs073
    @lcs073 5 років тому +218

    That's the correct way to dry the camera.

    • @GrandHuevotes
      @GrandHuevotes 5 років тому +11

      Jim Lim more like that’s the correct way to end up back at TCSTV 😹

    • @Babumoshaaai
      @Babumoshaaai 5 років тому

      Digital Tog Can’t do a Jay Leno.

    • @DarkPa1adin
      @DarkPa1adin 5 років тому

      A 5000 camera

    • @gilangromero
      @gilangromero 5 років тому +5

      i held my breath while watching

  • @ekchuahstudios9066
    @ekchuahstudios9066 5 років тому +4

    I recently got the Leica Q2 and I love it. I am a fast shooter at different events. I've had to slow down a little to let the camera catch up. I just shot a car show and was glad to see it could autofocus shiny metal surfaces without too much problem. I sometimes had to aim at the black tires to get it to focus or the engine if the hood was up. All in all, it did a good job focusing. The best thing about this camera is that I leave everything set to manual and because the three main settings are on top of the camera I can change something very fast without having to go into a menu and look around for what I want. I was constantly changing the f/stop for different situations and it was so fast to do then put it back to auto if I wanted, same with the shutter speed. I usually shoot with a Nikon D4 and a D810 and love those cameras because I can shoot fast with them. The Leica Q2 is a camera for getting up close to people and shooting slower but getting great results. It has a 47MB sensor which produces 87 to 89 MB DNG files. The JPG files set to large end up at about 12 MB.

  • @ThePhotographyHobbyist
    @ThePhotographyHobbyist 5 років тому +9

    That's actually a Leica I could see myself buying if I had all the other items I want for my main camera. If I had the money saved and had everything else I need, I'd feel ok buying this particular Leica to have as a 'keep it with me at most times' sort of camera and a long term purchase too.

  • @AP_Thailand
    @AP_Thailand 5 років тому +8

    Thank you for this honest review. Also IP52 is not IP68, better to keep it far from water...

  • @JerichoWhiskey
    @JerichoWhiskey 5 років тому +4

    I see Chris and Jordan, I watch and like.

  • @woodsbm
    @woodsbm 4 роки тому +1

    I LITERALLY SCREAMED when he swung that camera around. My heart.

  • @williaml1570
    @williaml1570 5 років тому +26

    like an ex who was smart, elegant and charming but drank too much and sometimes showed up to dinner way too drunk and puts you into substantial debt.
    i like it.

  • @zfisher
    @zfisher 5 років тому +2

    Really great review, love seeing the mix of usability and technical performance. This is why I keep coming back to this channel!

  • @alexsorokin1896
    @alexsorokin1896 2 роки тому +2

    I'm still here, almost 3 years later, wanting this camera. At this point its just a money thing lol.
    0:12 sure was some accurate foreshadowing though.

  • @Andrew714oc
    @Andrew714oc 4 роки тому +6

    Chris, you psycho! My jaw dropped when you started “drying” the camera! Hahaha Awesome!

  • @Cryptopaja
    @Cryptopaja 5 років тому +25

    Waiting for Q1 to go under £2000.... getting there 👍🏻😀

  • @pbcana
    @pbcana 5 років тому +5

    Thanks for the review, Chris and Jordan! I wish you guys showed some sample images from the crop "digital zoom" modes in the different lengths.

  • @coffeendonut
    @coffeendonut 5 років тому +3

    As an Edmontonian (former Calgarian) watching you for years just wanted to say cool seeing you shoot in e-town

  • @pablofernandez66
    @pablofernandez66 5 років тому +51

    You buy the lens, and get the camera for free. Outstanding image quality

  • @cpdukes1
    @cpdukes1 5 років тому +19

    An unromantic and undeferential review. Refreshing.

  • @travislyssy3959
    @travislyssy3959 3 роки тому +3

    That vaccination joke was ahead of it's time.

    • @RabidNemo
      @RabidNemo 3 роки тому

      Glad I'm not the only one who noticed that lol

  • @yitzchallevi8208
    @yitzchallevi8208 5 років тому +1

    Great initial review Chris (and Jordan). Thank you!

  • @TonyAndChelsea
    @TonyAndChelsea 5 років тому +28

    Y'all brought your thumbnail game next level

    • @thatjordandrake
      @thatjordandrake 5 років тому +1

      This is the year I start taking thumbnails seriously...

    • @DarkPa1adin
      @DarkPa1adin 5 років тому +1

      Felt like dumb and dumber

  • @Coldgecko
    @Coldgecko 5 років тому +2

    Hi there, quick one... I ride a motorcycle around the world. Leaving in a month from Miami to Los Angeles then to Montana and then back to Miami. Then in July I'm off from Amsterdam through Europe, Russia, China, a few ISTAN's, Laos, Thailand.... You get the idea... Camera on a motorcycle. One camera, one lens generally -- Space for a camera on a motorcycle is seriously limiting along with weight. Also, hate using a large lens in from of local people -- they get intimidated and I love shooting portraits of local off the grid people. I'm always under time pressure to get to the next place so its all about running and gunning shots sadly. I took a XT-2 with 35mm on last large trip last year -- was ok, but I wanted to take a FF camera instead since I need to crop often and need more mp to do so. I am thinking about Sony A7RIII with 35mm or other (had a A7RII and loved it). I am also seriously tempted to get the new Q2 due to its simplicity. Question: It's a stupid hardware question which I know is not the most important -- but which camera and lens would you take if it could only be one of each. Must be a hardened camera because it will get beaten down to death at the end of these trips. Cost is not most important -- the best tool is most important. Thanks.

    • @chrisd6193
      @chrisd6193 5 років тому

      Id love to know too.

  • @Dangerousdaze
    @Dangerousdaze 5 років тому +5

    Nice review - none of the negatives were unknown to me which is a relief as I have my order in for a Q2 with one of the UK’s largest camera stores. I’m 59th in line and they’ve had 4 units so far!
    I’m in it for the shooting experience of my beloved M6, the perfection of a 28mm SUMMILUX (that I wouldn’t be able to afford on its own) and the crop-ability of the sensor. Seems like a winner to me.

    • @MatthewSeratti
      @MatthewSeratti 5 років тому

      In no way is it similar to shooting with an M6. Saying this as a friend, not a hater. I own an M6 and owned a Q.

    • @Dangerousdaze
      @Dangerousdaze 5 років тому +1

      Matthew Seratti Thanks for the reply, and yes, I agree. There’s clearly a difference between the “photography distilled” experience of the M6 and a modern digital with an EVF, autofocus etc., but it’s going to be a lot closer than, say, my Sony RX100MkV or a Ricoh GRII. Why did you sell your Q, as a matter of interest?

    • @Dangerousdaze
      @Dangerousdaze 5 років тому

      @@MatthewSeratti Heh, I cancelled my Q2 order in the end and got an M10 instead. Happy. :)

  • @Noealz
    @Noealz 5 років тому +9

    What a cool place to shoot at

  • @AgnostosGnostos
    @AgnostosGnostos 5 років тому +7

    The native ISO 50 is impressive. Most photographers are more interested with high ISO but very few know that low ISO offers greater dynamic range. Nearly all cameras have a native ISO 100. The mirrorless Nikon Z7 has native ISO 64 and is another exception too.

    • @Dangerousdaze
      @Dangerousdaze 5 років тому +2

      Plus, when you can shoot at an eighth of a second hand-held due to the OIS and the 28mm you can keep the ISO down for longer (unless you’re capturing action, but this isn’t really an action camera).

    • @AgnostosGnostos
      @AgnostosGnostos 5 років тому +1

      Nick Milner Thank you for the reply. The optical stabilization really helps. Even one or two stops benefit is very important.

    • @Naher1mne1utub
      @Naher1mne1utub 5 років тому

      ISO is just a number.

    • @AgnostosGnostos
      @AgnostosGnostos 5 років тому

      Naher1mne1utub High ISO numbers deteriorate seriously the dynamic range, the colors and add noise.
      Most serious photographers use tripods in order to avoid faster shutter speeds and keep the ISO number as low as possible.
      With ISO numbers between 50 to 800 the quality of jpeg photos is really good without any very obvious difference. The difference is apparent with the processing of raw photos. With raw photo very low ISO numbers permits the adjusting of the dynamic range without consequences. That is very important.

  • @DennisLimCY
    @DennisLimCY 5 років тому +9

    2:46 - Best Video Ever!
    Please spin-dry every camera moving forward. This should be a Chris Signature Move.

  • @frankwu1713
    @frankwu1713 5 років тому +13

    Leica Q: an amazing Leica Chassis camera with yesteryear specs
    Leica Q2: all caught up baby

    • @TheIkaika777
      @TheIkaika777 5 років тому +4

      With slow af which = yesteryear specs.

    • @TechnoBabble
      @TechnoBabble 5 років тому +7

      Yeah but the cameras made by those companies with "yesteryear specs" don't cost $5000. Leica really is a camera for people with more money than brains. At this point they're basically just Panasonic cameras with a red dot, nothing special about them in terms of technology.

    • @ryanb8736
      @ryanb8736 5 років тому

      Did you watch the video? It’s slow and overpriced. Video features suck too. Cool looking camera though.

  • @vinaynagdev3774
    @vinaynagdev3774 5 років тому +26

    IAM GOING WITH FUJI X100F!

    • @DarthAlgar5
      @DarthAlgar5 5 років тому +1

      vinay nagdev me too!!

    • @Broodjemetbeleg
      @Broodjemetbeleg 4 роки тому +1

      Excellent choice how are you finding it?

    • @hedisersoub4152
      @hedisersoub4152 4 роки тому +2

      It’s wonderful

    • @tallaganda83
      @tallaganda83 4 роки тому +3

      Much smarter choice unless you are Doctor who needs a nice fashion accessory for family snaps around the ski resort.

  • @ottoman1755
    @ottoman1755 4 роки тому +6

    What I love about his reviews: he ain’t nobodies boy! Just going to tell it how it is!

  • @chippy511
    @chippy511 2 роки тому +2

    Nice if you have the cash for it - i shall stick to my Fuji X100V which i love lots of things to like functionality and of course its a lot cheaper thanks Chris for the review. Keep em coming lots have fun

  • @borden17
    @borden17 3 роки тому +1

    i love how Chris specified the digital M my M2 was a tank

  • @Wyllies11
    @Wyllies11 5 років тому +5

    My heart almost didn't survive your drying ritual

  • @loft4me
    @loft4me 5 років тому +4

    Amazing ice corridors. For some reason, I feel like renting The Shining.

  • @gewglesux
    @gewglesux 5 років тому +3

    This is the first review that wasn’t glowing. I’m still considering this machine..

  • @Fugue602
    @Fugue602 5 років тому +10

    2:50 heart attack achieved.

  • @bengregoire
    @bengregoire 5 років тому +2

    I'm glad I'm not the only one who dries my cameras like that.

  • @drewcrawford3211
    @drewcrawford3211 5 років тому +2

    Best intro since the a7M3

  • @brettmiller2160
    @brettmiller2160 4 роки тому +1

    Leica V- Lux 5 & Panasonic Fz1000 wondering if you guys think there is much difference? Also your thoughts on the leica v lux 5

  • @nhwng2494
    @nhwng2494 4 роки тому +2

    Would you recommand the Q or Q2? I like the switch on/off with single/continuous shot on the Q, but then I like the dust/moisture resistant feature on Q2.

  • @gregoryrogalsky6937
    @gregoryrogalsky6937 3 роки тому +1

    I would have liked to see more info on manual focusing this camera for street.

  • @iM-mf1ke
    @iM-mf1ke Рік тому

    This is a real review, the others on UA-cam are basically commercial for this camera .

    • @dpreview
      @dpreview  Рік тому

      That’s what we do! Thanks for watching.

  • @basilbrush9888
    @basilbrush9888 Рік тому +1

    I borrowed a brand new M11 with 35mm lens a few days ago. I wanted to see what was so different about Leica and the always talked about ' Leica Look'. I have compared very detailed shots of the new M11, a Sony A7iii and Fujifilm XPro3. Aside from resolution, i seriously cannot fathom the extra $10000 price tag for the Leica. Sure the image is much higher in megapixels, but honestly all 3 cameras produced roughly the same quality photo. I appreciate that people like to purchase high end brands as they like prestige gear, but......i do not see it worth it. For anyone stuck on the fence about getting a Leica camera, I can honestly say that if you have the money do what you want. i have the money to purchase a few of these M11's but to be brutally honest I cannot see the any reason aside from image status to own one. i have tested dynamic range and processed the photos like any normal consumer would and I would bet nobody reading this could determine which camera made which photo. Note to newcomers, DO NOT get caught up in the leica hype. Like all other mirrorless bodies, they are just sensors and a lens like any other mirrorless camera. After shelling out $10,000 plus for a leica, you are kidding yourself if you think your photos are superior to anything else a fifth the price on the market.Sure if leica gave me a camera i would take it, but i am in no way paying that much money for something that delivers image quality on par with much much cheaper brands. Dont believe me?......rent one and see for yourself. I have leica raws I could tell you came from a sony a7iv and you would believe me. UA-camrs seem to pushing the Q2 at the moment, avoid it at all costs. You are not getting a camera that is superior in any way. Leica cameras do have once strength that none of the other brands have yet to achieve. Their bodies and lens drain your wallets very quickly with no noticeable benefit to the owner. Maintenance on leica is insanely offensive too along with accessories. I dare you to prove me wrong.

  • @Klarden
    @Klarden 5 років тому +5

    Gosh, that kid is so... teenage dramatic with the headphones. So relatable :D
    The body on these Leicas are genuinely amazing. Such a shame they're so pricey.

  • @gregoryemmanuel9168
    @gregoryemmanuel9168 2 роки тому

    Excellent review, I’m drooling.

  • @smiff9577
    @smiff9577 4 роки тому +3

    I just talked to a guy that has one. He said it's the ultimate travel camera. And let's be honest. We'd all love this camera if we could afford it 😂

    • @gewglesux
      @gewglesux 4 роки тому +1

      I'll have mine by this time next week... been aching for this since the first day i laid eyes on it.

    • @smiff9577
      @smiff9577 4 роки тому

      Resale has to be pretty nice too.

    • @gewglesux
      @gewglesux 4 роки тому +2

      @@smiff9577 Yeah, like a Rolex... I dont ever plan on selling it once i get me grubby mits on it. I like Street shooting, so that's how i plan on using it. I have Nikon system for everything else. Santa owes me from last year..

    • @smiff9577
      @smiff9577 4 роки тому

      Lol as long as your happy at the end of the day. Then that's all that matters

    • @gewglesux
      @gewglesux 4 роки тому

      @@smiff9577 Those are good words to live by..

  • @Broodjemetbeleg
    @Broodjemetbeleg 4 роки тому +4

    Amazing looking camera, although I very much preferred shooting with my Fuji x100f or xpro 2, 47mp is pretty overkill for street and I can't see myself dropping that amount of cash on a camera. If I were to get one it would either be a q1 or a M6 body

  • @jameshammond89
    @jameshammond89 5 років тому +2

    That drying technique is worth a like alone

  • @jeffreysargent
    @jeffreysargent 4 роки тому +3

    Thank you for this review, good stuff! Who out there actually has this camera, uses it, and has insight on pros and cons? What are your thoughts and experiences with it? Would you buy it again? Would you recommend it?

  • @avinashrai11141
    @avinashrai11141 5 років тому +34

    How do Leica price their camera?
    Through auction in Leica boardroom meeting.

    • @soundknight
      @soundknight 5 років тому +1

      :) that was good

    • @bngr_bngr
      @bngr_bngr 5 років тому +1

      DIY-HACKS not a bad price point compared to the M10.

    • @riccardoredio
      @riccardoredio 5 років тому

      is more or less the same price point of Sony Rxr1 and Zeiss Zx1...

    • @ryanb8736
      @ryanb8736 5 років тому +2

      Haha. Camera Conspiracies needs to do a boardroom meeting on this camera.

    • @telemaq76
      @telemaq76 5 років тому +1

      Well they pay the people making them ,handmade. Don T compare with the salary of Chinese people making consumers cameras

  • @ianjoc00
    @ianjoc00 5 років тому +7

    I've been curious about this. I still don't get why a $5K camera would not have a class-leading low-light, can't keep up with sports camera's, portrait images, etc. Is it just the Leica badge and German-made bragging rights that people would buy this?

    • @drs-Rigo-Reus
      @drs-Rigo-Reus 5 років тому

      pretty much yes. That and a brick against burglars. Even Chris is bored to death.

  • @boris.dupont
    @boris.dupont 5 років тому +3

    Thanks! I had a chance to test it out and it's much better than I expected. Now is it worth $5,500? Honestly I'd rather buy a Fujifilm X-T3 combined with 2, 3 or even 4 of their best prime lenses for the same price as I'd get a better outcome

    • @dzevadbayraktar322
      @dzevadbayraktar322 5 років тому

      sue but that is a lot of weight how many kilos? Some people like me just like and prefer one (even with limitations) lens no tinkering and exchanging lens etc etc

    • @boris.dupont
      @boris.dupont 5 років тому

      @@dzevadbayraktar322 that's why I have my X100 with me at all times 😉

    • @boris.dupont
      @boris.dupont 5 років тому

      @Carlos Vega you're right for some of them but I know many Leica photographers who actually switched to Fuji. I don't know many professional photographers who can afford to shoot Leica anymore 😉

  • @designjy
    @designjy 5 років тому +8

    I wouldn't do that to an IP52 camera...lol....you and the Leica got lucky there :) ........(5 is for dust, 2 is for liquids) btw Great review again guys! ....

    • @EbrahimSaadawii
      @EbrahimSaadawii 5 років тому

      Would you be kind enough to quickly explain IP rating meaning to us? I can't find a simple article

    • @ricky1981234
      @ricky1981234 5 років тому

      @@EbrahimSaadawii www.dsmt.com/resources/ip-rating-chart/
      IP52 means:
      Dust - Ingress of dust is not entirely prevented, but it must not enter in sufficient quantity to interfere with the satisfactory operation of the equipment; complete protection against contact.
      Water - Vertically dripping water shall have no harmful effect when the enclosure is tilted at an angle up to 15° from its normal position.

    • @chengdong4548
      @chengdong4548 5 років тому +2

      @@EbrahimSaadawii Just google it

    • @designjy
      @designjy 5 років тому

      @@EbrahimSaadawii www.dsmt.com/resources/ip-rating-chart/

    • @DarkPa1adin
      @DarkPa1adin 5 років тому +1

      It is light splash resistant, I think it will die under rainfall

  • @SmartPhotoVault
    @SmartPhotoVault 4 роки тому +4

    2:50 Just a casual camera strap test. Gulp!!!

  • @alexandredebellefeuille4671

    Great - and intelligent - review. Thank you!

  • @KeeeeenW
    @KeeeeenW 3 роки тому +2

    The best part about Q2 is that a used Q with the same lens and design is now more affordable. As a Q owner, I found it to be the only camera I need. If I need better low night performance, I have my iPhone with night mode.

  • @KenMiddletonUkulele
    @KenMiddletonUkulele 5 років тому +1

    Do you think that the high ISO/low light issues can be be fixed or at least improved in a future firmware update?

  • @nhwng2494
    @nhwng2494 5 років тому +1

    Would love to own a Q2, but I like the Q with easy access of continuous shooting switch. And, I wish the Q2 is equipped with GPS. I guess I have to wait for Q3 ... lol

  • @NWP4440
    @NWP4440 5 років тому +2

    The music during the night shoot made me feel like I was watching Austin Powers.

  • @michawilke
    @michawilke 5 років тому +4

    Cool location ;-) And Chris, you got so a kind way to step on other peoples toes (your findings on low light performance...) I'm sure they won't scream as loud as they would otherwise ;-)

  • @vacationviking
    @vacationviking 5 років тому +1

    Great video guys!!

  • @jplimages
    @jplimages Рік тому

    Hey. Now that the Q3 is “on order” in most stores in Canada the Q2 is now coming down (a little) in price. Running into an issue, kind of. What the heck is the difference between Leica Q2 Digital Camera 19050 and Leica Q2 Digital Camera 19051? Any ideas?

  • @MiladJPanah
    @MiladJPanah 4 роки тому

    it's simply said: The Q2 is a 28mm Summilux that gives you an excellent body for free.
    I will consider it as my budget is around 5000€ and with this camera, I can have both, M type body with the newest technologies as well as the Summilux in one.

  • @izopen
    @izopen 5 років тому +3

    Music is serious guys. 👏🏾

    • @thatjordandrake
      @thatjordandrake 5 років тому

      Our friends at BeatSuite.com came through again!

  • @simonwilliams2109
    @simonwilliams2109 5 років тому +1

    Thanks guys, “cool” review as always!

  • @SuperChi11
    @SuperChi11 5 років тому

    What exactly is the point if these Leica’s other than being good at jpeg. You would think they would put the ultimate sensor into this for $5K but the cheaper competitors out way it by a bunch. For $5K I can get a Fuji Medium format.

    • @telemaq76
      @telemaq76 5 років тому

      yes but you have no lens. if you had a summilux to your medium format, it wont be 4500$, more 10 000 $.

  • @schumif1champ
    @schumif1champ 5 років тому +3

    M10 is also weather sealed. That little amount of water will not hurt most cameras.

    • @bngr_bngr
      @bngr_bngr 5 років тому

      schumif1champ just the M lens is not weather sealed at the mount.

    • @schumif1champ
      @schumif1champ 5 років тому

      bngr bngr Leica has said before the connection is so tight they do not need a rubber seal. Have you put an m lens on a body it’s perfection how tight it is and how short the travel is to click.

    • @bngr_bngr
      @bngr_bngr 5 років тому

      schumif1champ my Summarit from 1956 fits as tight as a modern Leica lens. There is no play in either lens. My Nikon F also has the same tolerance as does my Canon 1Dxii. But water still can get in the Leica or Nikon. Canon L lens usually have a rubber seal that is compressed when the lens is mounted. They also have rubber seal at different points in the lens construction. My Leica lens do not have seals at the focus or aperture ring. Nor do they have o seals at the front element. All points that water can get in. Ive had my Canon and a 400/2.8 in pouring rain but I would not use my Leica with Noctilux in the rain.

    • @MYMEDIATOUR
      @MYMEDIATOUR 5 років тому

      @@bngr_bngr Really my 1dxii does not have even close to the same tolerance as my m10. The m10 from the time you mate the lens to the little twist its much tighter its almost a joke the 1dxii sloppy latch in compared to my m10.

    • @bngr_bngr
      @bngr_bngr 5 років тому

      MYMEDIATOUR thats surprising. I would get a new mount on the 1Dx. I only use L glass. Maybe the rubber seal makes it feel tighter. So I have no experience with a regular lens. Haven't used the M10. How do you like it? How does it compare to the R? Do you use er lens on it?

  • @FauxtakuLounge
    @FauxtakuLounge 5 років тому

    Do I understand it correctly that the Q2, like the Q, relegates half stops to the sub-dial? I wish they'd implement the Leica M style shutter dial with half stops.

  • @karl5874
    @karl5874 5 років тому +1

    Hmm do you consider IP52 proper weather sealing? That's a very low rating in my opinion 🤔 But better than nothing 🤷

  • @Alan-Zorro
    @Alan-Zorro 5 років тому

    Thanks for the honest review. Now why didn't I think of that drying method?

  • @moroishere777
    @moroishere777 5 років тому +17

    So you can have a both a7iii and an a7riii for the price of one of them Q2 leica ? ...

    • @dasaauto2024
      @dasaauto2024 5 років тому +3

      Ammar Yasser Hmm. Yes, I suppose you’re right. But, I challenge you to ask yourself whether either of those cameras posses a soul? Can they whisper to the quiet, intuitive curiosities that purr silently in the heart? Can they cause sparks to pop and flitter and ricochet around the vast cavern of one’s creative genius? Do either radiate a certain... perhaps unnamable, maybe even intangible... warm and contagious glow? Or a sense of purpose-direct and certain-that is nudged gently into gear by Leica’s essential, bare, and minimal tactile form?
      Or, do these two consumer electronic products, filed in our collective conscious under “full frame mirrorless camera,” and made somewhere in the Far East by robots in factory #328,941,386... do they really, just, “take pictures”?

    • @JessDemant
      @JessDemant 5 років тому +11

      ​@@dasaauto2024 Either all cameras have a soul or all cameras have no soul, but it is probably more Leica's advertising department that promotes a soul than the camera itself. All sense says go for a Sony A7RIII with a 28mm.f.2 or a 50mm.f.1.8 or both, and you also get better autofocus and video. It's a no brainer!

    • @TheJudge064
      @TheJudge064 5 років тому

      @@dasaauto2024 yes they can. Totally depends on who you are and how your personality is.
      Poor Sony, I feel so bad for them. Everybody says the same thing about them.

    • @airdailyx
      @airdailyx 5 років тому +2

      Jess Demant Aggeboe yeah but you cant brag that you can afford a camera that cost twice as more with half the features. Thats the soul of the Leica Man.

    • @xmlthegreat
      @xmlthegreat 5 років тому +4

      I honestly think that Leica is intentionally playing a prank on people still stupid enough to buy their trash at insane markups.

  • @RomanatorII
    @RomanatorII 4 роки тому

    digital M cameras from the 240 onward are also weather sealed.

  • @DarkPa1adin
    @DarkPa1adin 5 років тому +1

    This is the shortest video review ever! I wanted more Jordan screen time tho

  • @manphoto1972
    @manphoto1972 5 років тому

    I use a lot my vintage lens ( 50 f1.2 ais , 24 F2 ais, 105 F2,5 ais ) with Zhongyi speedbooster and it's very efficient et nice rendition...and it work fine with new nikon mount lens too.

  • @MrMilanina
    @MrMilanina 4 роки тому

    I saw there was a FW update that allows for all manual settings in video now. I wish it came with Leica-Log.

  • @JeffreyAK38
    @JeffreyAK38 5 років тому

    Well done. Great demo!

  • @DonTheDino
    @DonTheDino 5 років тому +4

    I’ll stick to my analog Leica MP and 28mm summicron 👌

  • @markriley7472
    @markriley7472 4 роки тому

    Available on Amazon UK for only £4,200-and free delivery! And for that price it should not only be weather proofed but able to withstand a 5 megaton atomic blast!

  • @kailimedia
    @kailimedia 5 років тому +2

    The lens itself is already a good reason to get this camera

  • @lamaludwig1470
    @lamaludwig1470 3 роки тому

    Very well balanced and informative. I own the Q and know it's not perfect. But it's great!

  • @Durio_zibethinus
    @Durio_zibethinus 5 років тому +15

    2:51 oh my poor heart

  • @MrChomiq
    @MrChomiq 5 років тому +2

    Hey Sony take a note on the battery type for your future RX1 III. Slap a Z type in it!

  • @gonzaress200
    @gonzaress200 5 років тому +8

    相変わらずカッコいいですね!
    メキシコ旅行前にGR3を買った
    Q2にしなかったのはQP2が欲しいから!

  • @fingerhorn4
    @fingerhorn4 4 роки тому +1

    At that ridiculous price I'd want weather sealing, a free bottle of champagne every morning, a red carpet, 10 free max storage SD cards, four lenses, a partridge in a pear tree and a lifetime warranty.

  • @LasstUnsSpielen
    @LasstUnsSpielen 2 роки тому

    What would be a good alternative to the Q2 now?

  • @brycespivey
    @brycespivey 4 роки тому

    How do you edit Leica Q2 DNG's with the Leica color profiles in Lightroom (Natural, Monochrome, Monochrome HC, etc)? I'm running v9.3 and they don't show up

  • @wannazmi4321
    @wannazmi4321 5 років тому +2

    Sorry Leica, but you can't have Jordan love for video 😂😂,
    Btw Jordan is pretty straight to the point there, only couple of seconds.

  • @Blackriver69
    @Blackriver69 5 років тому

    Guys, how do you not have a Sony 135mm GM video up yet?

  • @agenericaccount3935
    @agenericaccount3935 2 роки тому

    The spin dry 🤣
    Also, phoning from the future to let you know that in a few months, you'll have realized how important being "Up to date" will end up being.

  • @alsokooniiee4797
    @alsokooniiee4797 5 років тому +1

    I have a question. I know this is new but which in your opinion is better? The Rx1rii or the Q2?

  • @survivaltips9293
    @survivaltips9293 4 роки тому

    Leica is my favorite camera

  • @carlosriveros3039
    @carlosriveros3039 2 роки тому

    great channell. can you do more with the q2

  • @michaelbruchas6663
    @michaelbruchas6663 5 років тому +3

    Love the camera but can’t afford the price...😟

  • @tomscott4438
    @tomscott4438 5 років тому

    So the real question is, all things being unequal... would you opt for the original Q?

  • @johnjon1823
    @johnjon1823 2 роки тому

    So we have a Monk moment at 4:20 - do you know the episode ;)

  • @saucelove
    @saucelove 3 роки тому

    Q2 seems like a wonderful performer, l will stick with my GFX 50R and XT3

  • @vlcheish
    @vlcheish 5 років тому +1

    Obviously nice camera but 5k is a lot of dough and I'd like to see if Sony does a follow up to the RX1.

    • @airgreek
      @airgreek 3 роки тому

      They did it's the RX1Rii

    • @vlcheish
      @vlcheish 3 роки тому

      @@airgreek I meant a RX2.

  • @markyteo
    @markyteo 5 років тому +6

    Two weeks of waiting and we only get 30 secs of Jordan... At least take some pictures of him! Lol

    • @thatjordandrake
      @thatjordandrake 5 років тому +1

      There will be plenty of me in next week's episode!

  • @cameraprepper7938
    @cameraprepper7938 2 роки тому

    I wish Leica will make a "Q" Camera with 60+ megapixels sensor, 9.5+ mill. dots EVF and Leica M mount !