WCCO-TV Bill Carlson interviews Mick Jagger, 1970?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 лют 2022
- Bill Carlson interviews Mick Jagger of the Rolling Stones for WCCO.
Digitized by TCMediaNow a 501c3 dedicated to preserving Twin Cities film and video.
Please consider supporting preservation of local history
www.tcmedianow.com
![Mick Jagger • Interviews/Press Conferences/B-Roll (“Ned Kelly”) • 1969 [RITY Archive]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/61bG57U1KiU/mqdefault.jpg)
Mick looks so laid-back in this interview. Mick is looking fine as wine 🍷. He has a beautiful accent. He has a love for the U.S. he is very calm in his demeanor. He is very serious about his music 🎶 🎵 and his songwriting 🎉🎉. He definitely loves what he does. He's love acting as well. He's very versatile in all that he does. He likes to step out into new things🎉🎉.
Beautiful man. Magnetic
He's so adorable
Best front man in the history of history. He set the standard for everyone else
Please...don't embarrass yourself.
You're exactly correct
Lol.
Jagger and Pop! :0)
@@danorthsidemang3834You have 95 videos on this video alone. Talk about embarrassing oneself. What a loser 🤣
Mick’s chewing noises are the only ones I allow lol
Wow! Never seen this before! I'd say it's even earlier, 1968...
It could be, because although they mention Performance (finished 1968), they don't discuss at all the delay in release (1970), which I think they would have. :0)
I think this was to promote the film performance, in which Mick played a rock star.
You mean himself
You don’t have to think it. He said PEFORMANCE in the end.
Changed the world
Mick Jagger really nailed it with a political situation in this country, if you think about it that's exactly what's going on now today and it must have started back in the '70s, as an aftermath of the 60s
Oh wow 😮 i've never seen this before 😮
Munching on food during interviews was almost a trademark of his.
It wouldn't fly for any artist today. It was of its time...
But, it belongs to Mick.
This literally might be the only interview where he ever munches on anything.
This is 1970. Interview mentions the movie Performance multiple times. Some artwork from the movie in the backdrop. This was filmed in London as he mentions. I’d assume it was filmed right around the release of the movie which was August of 1970
Performance was filmed in late 1968. However, it was not released until 1970 due to it’s content which had to be edited.
@@BigSky1 when the americans producers saw the movie for the first time, some wanted to burn it :)
@@MethildeThere are always people around who want to burn down anything unusual and interesting that crashes the norm. They were probably hoping for another John Wayne movie. :0)
TRES Cool
So ❤ed Micks look in the early 70s. Did so much art works of Jagger in the 70s. But odd that he's talking so low in this interview. Mick was so damn sexy in the late 60s & early 70s. Loved his charisma. Didn't care for his acting in Ned Kelly though. But Micks still full of energy with his wellness routine. I hope he lives to see youngest son on stage. ❤
Mick didn’t care for his performance in Ned Kelly either but he was fantastic in Performance. He’s much better as an androgynous reclusive rock star living with two women taking mushrooms than an Aussie outlaw cowboy.
Great upload, never knew this interview existed. Must be September 1968, while filming Performance.
68 or 69????
Behind them it's a piece of Performance movie set.
@@Methilde🤣 -
1968 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_(film)#
Can’t believe a young Mick Jagger could see how America was divided decades ago.
Could be 1970 -- as they mention Performance. But it was finished in '68 and release held up until 1970. So could anywhere along that timeline. :0)
I'd say that's 1969 whilst filming Performance.
The blood spattered background is from a scene in Chas's flat in the film
YES, YOU'RE RIGHT!
And Jagger have still the same black dyed hairs than in the movie.
Performance wrapped filming in the Fall of 1968.
His hair is dyed black as in Performance which was filmed in 1968.
Altamont, 1969, compare with Keith's natural hair color: sfae.com/ECommerceSite/files/e9/e97870d7-eb86-4eb8-886d-fab580b786df.jpg
The three chocolates are the real stars of this interview.
Grapes
I am grom MPLS MN and i can say that i can remember Bill Carlson and wccp. But was this a real interview??????
This seems like its from the filming of 'Performance" so it shoud be dated Autumn '68
A contriving front singer
1971
Likely 1969 because he didn't ask about Altamont.
Grapes, Murder, it's just a shot away....
LOL
0:37 Wait until you get to 2023 then! Strangling all day long! :0/
Prescience
Yes, he already talks about America cut in two.
Thic cant be real!!! ???????
This is 1971 and it makes me wonder how Mick feels now. To get things done you must work hard. 1971, or 1969? Performance is a that never made it to middle America. When it came out, it went to the big cities only.💜🌹🐟🐏🦄🌸😇🐎🐪🌱🐠🐐🐞🍀🐡🦗🐓🌼🐹🌿🦂💥🐈🥴😻💋🧡☘💜🌹🐟🐏🦄🌸😇🐎🐪🌱🌿🐹🌼🐓🦗🐡🍀🐞🐐🐠🦂💥🐈🥴😻💋🧡☘
Thank you for highlighting my comment.🐟🐏🐈🌱🐪🐓🐹😻🦄🐞🌼🌹🐐🌸🌿🌿💥☘🐎😇🥴🐍🐸🐊🐢🦎🦎🐱🐱⚘⚘🍀
No, 1971 Stones are in Exile.
@@BigSky1 You're right, it's filmed in the decor of Performance.
Could be 1970 -- as they mention Performance. But it was finished in '68 and release held up until 1970. So could anywhere along that timeline. :0)