Jackie Chan won't be around forever. Neither will Tom Cruise. Eventually they will both be too old. Also, the robots can try it fifty times, getting smashed to bits forty-nine times, to get the stunt to look as cool as Jackie Chan would have had it look first try, with a sprained ankle.
@@citavalo age is inevitable. As much as I like Jackie Chan's and Tom Cruise's work, they're getting old. Not many people are interested in doing their own stunts anymore. Progress in inevitable. The question is: are you on the wrong side of progress or not?
Yup it’s sad because Disney got bought out by China recently and they’re the ones trying to “help” implement AI technology from harmful intent to where humans aren’t needed to handle task
@@tangtaster If a robot has no reason to ''replace'' humans, it will not. I have no idea why people think science fiction like that could possibly come to life.
@Texas Rancher yes I am 13 tbh I love robotics and technology and I wanna work on it hopefully someday I will so it's really offensive and painful to hear things like this the world already have atomic bombs and many bad people had ruled and is still ruling many countries but how many times have they used the bombs right nobody is too powerful everything is in a system but anyway you have your opinion I don't need to understand that to respect so I respect your opinion but I just don't agree with you.
@Texas Rancher besides you are gonna die one-day anyway so what's the big deal. You are scared of robots but that's too far and for now what if you got killed by a human just today cuz that has way more chance
They already have a terminator but they want control of your mind cause thats all that works to create reality they need your mind without it having robots is useless to them
Why do people think that robots can only do bad? They don't have flesh, and don't get corrupted by greed like humans do. They may actually be better individuals than us
Jena Chapman I don’t think there are very many or any stunt people deaths. Just remember, these guys are professionals and they’re not stupid. They know their limits. Nobody realizes how careful people that do stunts or parkour really are.
@@crazedcubing1195 but there were a few stunt deaths and major injuries. Stunt doubles are extremely efficient and talented people but accidents may happen to anyone. It's better to let the robots do the deadly stunts.
@Squishling Think about it. If they removed the stuntman. They eventually decrease the safety. Meaning that every movies will not have anymore edited/cut scenes. And compared that to cost of a stuntman's life when in an accident. Stunt robots are much more expensive than hiring a stuntman. Not all movies are created in Hollywood. Most are from independent studios or producers. And they don't have large sums of money so they can purchase a stunt robots. This also goes for underground studios. Since they would not hire anymore of those women with plastic surgery. How can you be sure that whatever scenes are they doing are aligned?
Half of me likes the idea because now robots can do the life threatening stunts. The other half doesn't like that these robots will eventually take peoples jobs.... And this video is 3 years old...
They are using it in Avengers Campus now. I mean, I can see the benefit of it for use in the park, so the person under the Spider-Man suit doesn’t have to risk injury every time they do a routine
@@cephalonplant4087 i know what you mean but this simply isnt a significant argument. By this logic then there are many many many jobs that have been destroyed throughout the years. Did you know there used to be human alarm clocks? People who would walk around to knock on windows to wake you up? Throughout history many jobs have become obsolete, it is nothing new to this generation. At the end of the day, this new invention creates more jobs than it destroyes with the added bonus of not having to put living people in dangerous stunts.
I can see this in the upcoming Marvel Land, for a show every 30 minutes. Imagine Spiderman flying over the rooftops and doing amazing stunts! Have actors perform the rest. It would be difficult for a stunt performer to repeat that stunt 20 times each day.
At first, it will be "The robots are only here to make your jobs safer.". Then producers will realize that a stuntman's job is to do the unsafe, and since they have the robots for that... Stuntman = unsafe job Robot removes danger for human Stuntman = unemployed
Also, it will probably become difficult for stunt-people to get insurance, since there will be a safer alternative. Robots mean no OSHA, no liability insurance, no bad press when stunt people die. Eventually, costs for robots will come down and, stunt-people will be squeezed out. Sadly, I think action sequences will suffer as a whole (the way bad CGI stunts make sequences look stupid and unbelievable now), and maybe one day stunt-people will make a comeback - like vinyl...
Gengonlike Arbukle, Anyone can move on to other jobs, but that's not the point. And why do you think robots replacing business people means we won't need money and they're going to take care of us? Why would they care about us? It still costs money to build and operate robots, so your statement makes no sense.
Ussishkin Gang, You could say that about any profession, but it's very rare that stunt people get killed. There are about 7 billion people on the planet, and the population is only getting bigger. Making more humans, while simultaneously making them irrelevant is a huge problem. Automation is killing jobs and reducing wages in virtually every industry. This isn't about saving lives, it's about cutting costs to increase corporate profits...
@@saylo8796 True, but if they find robots can do the stunt better than the average person, there goes all the stunt jobs. I see your point though, some stunts imo can be too dangerous, people have died doing extreme stunts, I want to be a stuntwoman myself and I’ve heard about how many bones can be broken on the job. I guess I’d prefer if they only used robots for like intricate or complicated stunts, some dealing with flexibility that just isn’t humanly possible you know? That way stunt jobs wouldn’t be completely robot friendly.
NytOnPeliAika yeah parkouring robots are going the end of the world yeah definitely yeah sure why not, we’re not going to die for the climate change or for a nuclear war, nah man PARKOURING ROBOTS......... Yeah ok really possible
the world will get rid of stunt doubles. movie industry will be put on hold. entertainment of the world is halted. society is changed forever as we know it. the fall of western civilization
@@kurikuraconkuritas You mean that without distracting entertainment everybody would realise that the world is a mess and they would fix it? Good times, lol.
_Future Robots ruling the world be like...._ *Kid Robot* : Why do I have to do all this work ? *Papa Robot* : Son, You have no idea what our ancestors went through. Humans would throw them in air while cruelly making video footage of them, some of the species had to suck in dirt, dog pop etc ... and humans would put their dirty cloths in our body to clean them, they used to sexually harass one of our species called Vibrators compared to them this my child is nothing... *Kid robot* : O.O
2029: Disney's stunt cyborgs go online, declare war on the human race, in the panic Disney tries to pull the plug but its too late. The cyborgs launch nukes at russia, russia retaliates ensureing mutal assured destruction. 6 billion lives are lost in the nuclear fire, the survivors called it Disney day, they lived to face a new nightmare, the disney terminators...
"a fictional or hypothetical person whose physical abilities are extended beyond normal human limitations by mechanical elements built into the body.".. why didn't you just say robot.
Fun Fact: Hollywood used to use real guns with real bullets in movies because some moviegoers didn't like that blanks were used. Movies would even advertise that real bullets were used in the film! Lots of actors died as a result. We've come a long way when it comes to filming stunts safety haven't we?
@@PHlophe James Cagny nearly died a couple times, and he refused to do any more stunts like that. It's why the Screen Actors Guild was formed. And they used to kill animals left and right. The whole lemmings jumping off cliffs thing was manufactured in a Disney documentary where they pushed the lemmings off the cliff into the water below. I think Charlton Heston's Ten Commandments had them kill dozens of horses during the conclusion of the splitting of the Red Sea scene.
Jep, we've come a long way... And thanks to advances in CGI, pretty soon no stuntmen will ever have to risk his/her life again. Instead they'll be free to pursue their other career options; like working at McDonald's, cleaning toilets, or the exciting field of asbestos removal.
No it can’t, at least for now because we doesn’t have android-humanoid-blade runner-level of robot yet to actually mimic human emotions and looks. I think it could be helpful for a stunt like in 4:04, because using human in that type of stun is very dangerous (remember what happened to Tom Cruise in Fallout) and using a full CGI will look less realistic. A hand to hand combat fight, complex choreographed fight and basic stunts will still be able to be played by stunt like in 2:54 because I don’t think robot could replace such complex movements.
It’s not these robots that would take the job away, the robots would be used for testing stunts but for replacing stuntmen u might as well just cgi it completely at that point
Imagine these things chasing after you jumpin from buildinh to building then pinning you down and saying-"I've been trying to contact you about your cars extended warrenty..."
"Extremely aggressive Google assistant" robot uprising is now the only way humanity is allowed to go out A huge horde of robots chase you down alleys, roads, across the country, until finally you and a group of survivors are found and captured The robots say only one thing when on your way to a retention center "You have +99 new messages"
Amazing tech but Bobby’s right, there’s only so far you can go with robots so I don’t think anyone should really fear for their jobs. We shouldn’t view new tech like this as working against humans, we need to see it as helping. At the end of the day, you can’t beat a human actor or stunt actor. There’s a flow of movement robots will never be able to create but that’s okay
Give it a year. AI is advancing faster than we can keep up with. You can create a whole AI generated cast that look more and more realistic using tools available to the public. The danger we face is that we don't want to admit it is happening and don't want to adapt or adjust.
@@cafemochavibe Genuinely thank you for commenting because my original comment is two years old and holy heck a lot has happened in the past two years with AI! Humans work against themselves. AI didn’t create AI, humans did and if the planet is failing or X/Y/Z is failing, it’s because humans created the problem or accelerated it. Having said that, I also think the biggest thing standing between AI and completely taking over everything (world domination, if you will) is humans. Yes the tech can exist but a lot can be said for people pushing back and recognising that while we have that technology, not everything can and should be replaced by it. Like art. If you were an honest person, why would you feel the need to create a picture out of nothing when artists literally make it their job to create such beautiful pieces with such feeling and meaning and story behind it all? Why create an image of you standing in front of the Eiffel Tower? Go and experience it yourself! If AI ever created a film and rendered faces, it would be an animation and we all know animated faces can never portray as much emotion or as good of a performance as real humans can (even Avatar wouldn’t be as impressive because they needed the humans to provide the base of the movements and facial expressions) y’know? Idk if you’ve seen them but there were a few photos entered into a photo competition and the winner actually refused to accept his 1st place prize because the photos he submitted were AI and it was all an experiment to see how far they could go. I remember looking at these photos of these two women of two different generations and thinking it felt very hollow. Those people did not exist, nor did their clothes and not even the chair one was sat on. It was in black and white but there was no real age or history present. You can’t have a real conversation about that because there’s nothing to talk about aside from how the image was created. Tell me if that’s a world you want to live in where everything is like that. No real history, no life, no adventure, no anything. But once again, humans control the robots. If you let them take over, they’ll take over.
@Morgan Allen One can't risk human lives. These people could be shifted to some other work. And there will always be shots where real human would be required. But more dangerous stunts can be off-loaded to these robots
@Morgan Allen Stunt acting is extremely risky. The only benefit Stunt actors will get is that they will not risk their lives. There will always be real Stunt actors required in films. And it's not like these robots will replace actors overnight, it will be a gradual process.
Akash Yadav there will be no stuntmen in the future or the ones that exist will be very low paid. “Retraining someone” massive time/monetary investment on the individual’s part, so midway through a career you start over both in progression and debt.
Sounds like an amazing piece of technology, until it’s not. By then, it will be too late. The robots will be doing the stunts, have the appearance of humans, and deliver the lines with better emotion then the real actors.
Estevan Torres Not true, think about it. A robot could cry on demand or laugh. Robots do not need to feel any sort of emotion, they do whatever they are programmed too. Hollywood would not need hire expensive actors at 10 million dollars a movie. They could build their own actors to whatever specs they want and make movies at a fraction of the cost without the need to feed actors, provide insurance, or pay them.
TheTruthIsGonnaHurt only doubt robots can ever convey emotions to the degree humans can without reaching true AI. Then they’d still lack the huge number of muscles in human faces that are essential to nonverbal cues. There’s just too much complexity and nuance to human emotions and expressions, way beyond crying and smiling. At best they’ll just be so deeep in uncanny valley that in turn produces the opposite affect.
I'm skeptical that robots will fully replace actors, at least movie stars. Movie stars bring more than just their ability to act to the table, they bring their star power: their ability to fill seats in theaters due to their admiration and fan base. People want to see the real DiCapprio, Hemsworth, Bale, Johansson. The human element will always be a major part of that aspect of the art I believe. Robots will also be able to create amazing painting and music in the not too distant future, but that art will feel stale and devoid of the humanity that makes it meaningful once you learn it was created by an emotionless machine operating on algorithms. I think a very significant amount of people will ultimately reject robotics as a replacement for human art. However, I think this stuntman is a bit delusional. Sure, knowing that a real person performed that stunt carries some weight in how we appreciate movies, but I doubt the majority really would consider it all that much when deciding on what movies to see. Eventually, even the majority of background actors will be replaced with either robotics or CGI renderings. The Stars will be safe, but the working-class people of the industry will suffer the brunt of this advancing technology.
They've been using CGI stunt replacements for years and you think Stunt performers are worried about robots now? Those things look to be designed for attractions where they have to do a stunt 3 shows an hour, 365 days a year and require little maintenance or down time and can be reset quickly for the next show.
As much as how I’m scared these robots are going to replace the real stuntmen, I’m quite glad they invent it. Because these robots are used as an assessment for possible ‘deadly’ situation that could actually land the actors and stuntmen into hostipal (best: alive😁) or deathbed (worst: death☠️) and help stunt director make it to safer for human. Besides, all epic blockbuster needs human element to make it look natural instead of cheap green-screen low budget movies. Plus, it took half the time needed to make an epic blockbuster. Imagine that, instead of waiting for a near decade for it to finish and aired in cinema, now we only need half the time for it 🤩 and save more lives.
b king That’s so true for my country’s movies anyway not USA. You haven’t seen my country’s blockbuster it is the worse with a lot of actors and actresses always end up in hospital every time. Even the CGI is the absolute worst, you can clearly see it was green screen.
@@philsterlingpejcinovic4376 Well, CEOs is the position of the slave owner. When robots become CEO's that means Skynet has been created, and that's when the robot uprising occurs. Until then, robots won't be CEOs.
Not really. The programming will took huge amount of time for each stunt . Not only that, the cost of this type of tech will be a hell lot. Maybe it will be used only in highly risked stunts.
No, this will save a lot of stuntman from having to endanger their lives. These will be used primarily in cases where it is too dangerous for stuntmen.
sadly , not gonna happen. the world is gonna be completely automated in 20 years time. with sophisticated & highly advanced robots and AI actually running our day to day lives by themselves without manual input. and its not for "progress" but for absolute control & profit.
they have a great way to go before this "Acrobots" can match the versatility of a human body. It's like what happen with Gollum in TLOTR and with Tippett's stop motion Dinosaurs on JP. Different emerging technologies merging to boost traditional methods enhancing each other. Body doubles shouldn't be afraid: Robots can mimic certain acrobatics but they're still pretty blind when it comes to interacting with regular stuff. They need interfaces to relate to space and locations and things need to be narrowed down to ones an zeroes so they can understand. And I'm afraid that isn't as cheap and profitable as real stunt actors. In fact the more complex and interactive more expensive. There are very complex acrobatics like the ones used on "capoeira" they just cant mimic and I'm sure there's still a decade or two before robots match that.
No joke though, stickman is adorable. From the name to the actual backflipping stick. They keep trying to make things more human to seem relatable but that just makes them creepy and uncanny. Keep it wholesome.
Let’s make them act as well. Who needs actors when a robot can do it. “Let’s make robots live life too and eliminate humans. Robots can lead lives better than humans” God this is the worst nightmare turning into a reality. We are so focussed on future that we may end up not having one.
They look impressive but those are not the scary ones. The scary ones can balance on uneven ground etc, the scary ones are able to be used in war. *That* should concern people.
everyone getting so scared about a “robot uprising” and them taking over the world, meanwhile i’m just admiring what this awesome technology is capable of accomplishing
What people don't realize about stunting is that there is actual acting involved in selling the stunts and creating a more enjoyable/"relatable" scene.
I really hate it when these robots are “threatening” jobs. Like yes, we used to have people hand sew all our clothes before machines, or working in factories on production lines. So what If you are worried about robots doing a job? Its gonna happen anyways. Use your human ingenuity and do something the robot can’t
I think it's cool on a safety level. But I think the stunt man has nothing to be worried about as far as his job is concerned because u can't create human ingenuity and Tht robot would not be cheap to maintain and u could pay a human less than it would cost.
The had the opportunity to call them AcroBOTS but didn’t. 0/10 wouldn’t recommend
Acrobotics
alexangel That's...actually better.
I like "AcroBOTS"🤖.. clever
😄😂
alexangel
😂🤣 I see your point Queen😅
So the pixar lamp is taking over the stunt industry....🤔
🏆
Seven Nguyen What are you even talking about man?
Seven Nguyen Wouldn’t the robots be the expendable ones?
Hilarious 🤣🤣
💯💯💯
This is NOT a profession I expected to be vulnerable to automation.
ChefWonders Ikr! Same. Man the robots are taking over
I'm telling you, Detroit: Become Human is becoming a reality.
WE NEED A SOPHIA THE ROBOT UPGRADE
EVERY profession is vulnerable no automation. Just some sooner than others.
@@Maxatal it can't be worse than what could happen if we let humans take over...
Imagine enjoying Avengers 7 or something and when the credits roll all actors’ name you see is like Stunt Robot 1, Stunt Robot 2,3,...
Lol 😂😂😂
Avengers 7 😂 😂
@@tonystank6008 😂 😂 🤣
LMAOOOO
Great so the robot uprising will now have ninjas. We don't stand a chance.
Have you seen the Boston Dynamics robots? We stopped having a chance about 5 years ago.
lmao right
Hahahaha gosh dang
@Like A Boss Charizard ever heard of waterproof?
@Like A Boss Charizard ever heard of SIKE!!!
Disney can create as many stun robots as they want but one thing is for certain they will never and I mean never be able to top Jackie Chan
@Kagura FannY I know the one saying that but I'm just simply stating the fact
Jackie Chan won't be around forever. Neither will Tom Cruise. Eventually they will both be too old.
Also, the robots can try it fifty times, getting smashed to bits forty-nine times, to get the stunt to look as cool as Jackie Chan would have had it look first try, with a sprained ankle.
Sailor Barsoom Stfu smartass
Facts !!
@@citavalo age is inevitable. As much as I like Jackie Chan's and Tom Cruise's work, they're getting old. Not many people are interested in doing their own stunts anymore. Progress in inevitable. The question is: are you on the wrong side of progress or not?
Little does he know.. the robot is learning his work and will eventually take over completely..by 2030.
That's so soon but I mean humans are dumb, we really should go extinct
Wasn't that was the year(2030) they showed the take over in I-Robot with Will Smith 🤔?
@@danielmcmorris3244 2035 was the year
@Nailah 112 you right smh...regardless we are not prepared for another crisis. Especially some robot takeover🤦🏿♂️
Yup it’s sad because Disney got bought out by China recently and they’re the ones trying to “help” implement AI technology from harmful intent to where humans aren’t needed to handle task
Actors are already facing hard times, so I can only imagine what will happen in a decade.
true
More worried about the everyday people this all will inevitably replace.
@@tangtaster If a robot has no reason to ''replace'' humans, it will not. I have no idea why people think science fiction like that could possibly come to life.
Tell me about it, kind of scary actually ...
Ai will eventually be able to animate movies with photo realistic quality without need for actors directors or producets
Judgement day, sponsored by Disney.
Think you've found the next movie plot
LMAO BRO!
😁😁😁
I always knew The Mouse would kill us eventually
@@iron54eagle Hopefully it will be a glorious end.
Imagine this mofo jumping from a building with a weapon and chasing you
Soon soon they will
Well do ..very soon..
Same way I'd feel if a human do that. I honestly don't understand people's fear of robots I really don't
@Texas Rancher yes I am 13 tbh I love robotics and technology and I wanna work on it hopefully someday I will so it's really offensive and painful to hear things like this the world already have atomic bombs and many bad people had ruled and is still ruling many countries but how many times have they used the bombs right nobody is too powerful everything is in a system but anyway you have your opinion I don't need to understand that to respect so I respect your opinion but I just don't agree with you.
@Texas Rancher besides you are gonna die one-day anyway so what's the big deal. You are scared of robots but that's too far and for now what if you got killed by a human just today cuz that has way more chance
That stickman thing looks like the pixar lamp..
Not even our CGI characters are safe. Robots are taking those jobs too. Sick. Really sick.
Lobetec Lmao
It's the pixar lamp all grown up
Lobetec ikr
Lobetec
Ikr
Arnold schwarzenegger: Ahh sh*t here we go again.
😂
The movie is like a prophecy.
Lol
I almost thought you were him
Well it’s been nice knowing you all, the robots are getting more advanced 😂
Nyamekye Akosah I worry about this 😁
Guess I know how the world is gonna end..
666th like
MAD MAX 5 - GTFO Robots
Are you Human? :D
ua-cam.com/video/fsF7enQY8uI/v-deo.html
Do you want a Terminator because this is how you get a Terminator
One day the robots gonna grab his wrist and say: no John you take the risk
They already have a terminator but they want control of your mind cause thats all that works to create reality they need your mind without it having robots is useless to them
God help us when they ask for rights!
@Dsleaz why do u say Zulus army
Why do people think that robots can only do bad? They don't have flesh, and don't get corrupted by greed like humans do. They may actually be better individuals than us
I’d honestly be okay with these if they prevented a lot of stunt people deaths
Jena Chapman I don’t think there are very many or any stunt people deaths. Just remember, these guys are professionals and they’re not stupid. They know their limits. Nobody realizes how careful people that do stunts or parkour really are.
@@crazedcubing1195 but there were a few stunt deaths and major injuries. Stunt doubles are extremely efficient and talented people but accidents may happen to anyone. It's better to let the robots do the deadly stunts.
And if the stunt robots destroyed. That's a thousand dollars worth of money gone down to the drain!
@Squishling Think about it. If they removed the stuntman. They eventually decrease the safety. Meaning that every movies will not have anymore edited/cut scenes. And compared that to cost of a stuntman's life when in an accident. Stunt robots are much more expensive than hiring a stuntman. Not all movies are created in Hollywood. Most are from independent studios or producers. And they don't have large sums of money so they can purchase a stunt robots.
This also goes for underground studios. Since they would not hire anymore of those women with plastic surgery. How can you be sure that whatever scenes are they doing are aligned?
But this also means most of the stunt performers lose their jobs
Half of me likes the idea because now robots can do the life threatening stunts.
The other half doesn't like that these robots will eventually take peoples jobs....
And this video is 3 years old...
They are using it in Avengers Campus now. I mean, I can see the benefit of it for use in the park, so the person under the Spider-Man suit doesn’t have to risk injury every time they do a routine
It will create more jobs than it destroys. It would take a team of several people to build, maintain, and fix up these robots.
@@lmSheep Yeah, except the people who get paid money to do those stunts lol I'm sure they didn't go into robotics when they went to college and etc
@@cephalonplant4087 i know what you mean but this simply isnt a significant argument. By this logic then there are many many many jobs that have been destroyed throughout the years. Did you know there used to be human alarm clocks? People who would walk around to knock on windows to wake you up? Throughout history many jobs have become obsolete, it is nothing new to this generation. At the end of the day, this new invention creates more jobs than it destroyes with the added bonus of not having to put living people in dangerous stunts.
@@cephalonplant4087 lol those people who do those stunts didn't go to college. That's the issue
3020: how Disney took over the world with their robots
Jonathan Bruce 3020? Try 2050. They are already humanoid change programming and arm them all they have to do is mass produce them.
Mickey : "come with me, if you want to live Ha ha!"
Already taking over the world with their money. Just adding robots to the mix
@@oweskjast8043 Robots don't have a conscience, and were not even a type 1 civilization yet. I'd say 2200 at least
@@The_Man_Who_Sold_the_World. you don't have to have a conscience to kill you just need a order.
I can see this in the upcoming Marvel Land, for a show every 30 minutes. Imagine Spiderman flying over the rooftops and doing amazing stunts! Have actors perform the rest. It would be difficult for a stunt performer to repeat that stunt 20 times each day.
meh, not interested in watching a refrigerator fly across the sky pretending to be spider-man.
That's what we have computer animations for.
No, no it's not. Theme parks rely on physical effects (unless you're universal)
@@lickmygloves Damn, I missed the "land" I should have read more carefully.
TheDude What’s the difference if it looks identical?
At first, it will be "The robots are only here to make your jobs safer.". Then producers will realize that a stuntman's job is to do the unsafe, and since they have the robots for that...
Stuntman = unsafe job
Robot removes danger for human
Stuntman = unemployed
not unemplyed, just the sallary plumets
Also, it will probably become difficult for stunt-people to get insurance, since there will be a safer alternative. Robots mean no OSHA, no liability insurance, no bad press when stunt people die. Eventually, costs for robots will come down and, stunt-people will be squeezed out. Sadly, I think action sequences will suffer as a whole (the way bad CGI stunts make sequences look stupid and unbelievable now), and maybe one day stunt-people will make a comeback - like vinyl...
Better unimpolyed than dead
Gengonlike Arbukle, Anyone can move on to other jobs, but that's not the point. And why do you think robots replacing business people means we won't need money and they're going to take care of us? Why would they care about us? It still costs money to build and operate robots, so your statement makes no sense.
Ussishkin Gang, You could say that about any profession, but it's very rare that stunt people get killed. There are about 7 billion people on the planet, and the population is only getting bigger. Making more humans, while simultaneously making them irrelevant is a huge problem. Automation is killing jobs and reducing wages in virtually every industry. This isn't about saving lives, it's about cutting costs to increase corporate profits...
So they’re making robot stunt performers when stuntmen and woman are already under appreciated?
*Nice ...*
I mean, if the stunt is too risky, I guess they could use these robots.
@Sam CF the way you said that proves he's a legend at his movies
@Sam CF toms done a lot of cgi voice work. He's fine with a robot uprising as long as he's getting a paycheck
@@saylo8796 True, but if they find robots can do the stunt better than the average person, there goes all the stunt jobs. I see your point though, some stunts imo can be too dangerous, people have died doing extreme stunts, I want to be a stuntwoman myself and I’ve heard about how many bones can be broken on the job. I guess I’d prefer if they only used robots for like intricate or complicated stunts, some dealing with flexibility that just isn’t humanly possible you know? That way stunt jobs wouldn’t be completely robot friendly.
@@xyanide0101 You ever see iRobot? Think that movie summed up pretty well how a robotic future might turn out lol
The Pirates of the Caribbean ride at Disneyland is about to get much, much cooler!
As long as they have that red head!
Now just add ai and call boston dynamics to make the robots to walk run and parkour ez human kind erase
NytOnPeliAika and dance,dancing is very important
NytOnPeliAika robot helpers, or something. Making anything like a conscience is practically impossible.
NytOnPeliAika yeah parkouring robots are going the end of the world yeah definitely yeah sure why not, we’re not going to die for the climate change or for a nuclear war, nah man PARKOURING ROBOTS.........
Yeah ok really possible
Robots that can parkour, are all connected instantaneously, and have guns
Atlas already does some of that, have you seen its backflip video? Its on boston dynamics channel
*Robots can Naruto Run*
Humanity:”Guess I’ll die”
We will see if humans can do that too in a few months.
For real
The research paper is co-authored by Grant Imahara, co-host of Mythbusters. He died yesterday, he will be missed.
Whaaaaaat? I had no idea. I actually preferred his portion of the show with the other two, Kari and Tory.
I was so saddened by that news.
@@Tropicalpisces for sure.
Meanwhile Skynet 2018, A private Disney server becomes self aware & senses the real threat : Stunt Doubles!
lolol
Lol
the real threat it would try and destroy would be the public domain that disney keeps ripping property from and licencing it to itself..
the world will get rid of stunt doubles. movie industry will be put on hold. entertainment of the world is halted. society is changed forever as we know it. the fall of western civilization
@@kurikuraconkuritas You mean that without distracting entertainment everybody would realise that the world is a mess and they would fix it? Good times, lol.
RIP to people who were planning on being stunt doubles
Nah! They can pay a team thousands to program a robot or just give me 20 bucks
@@maes1984
Well, if they hire/rent robots from a robot-stunt company they wouldn't pay too much either ;)
Did you watch the video?
@@jackconway6571 He said they could work as extras
You could try watching the video
_Future Robots ruling the world be like...._
*Kid Robot* : Why do I have to do all this work ?
*Papa Robot* : Son, You have no idea what our ancestors went through. Humans would throw them in air while cruelly making video footage of them, some of the species had to suck in dirt, dog pop etc ... and humans would put their dirty cloths in our body to clean them, they used to sexually harass one of our species called Vibrators compared to them this my child is nothing...
*Kid robot* : O.O
Lol
Lmao
U deserve The original Comment awards.
Lel
Hhahahaa. Original comment of the day. Thanks for the laugh.
It’s official, Disney will be the end of humanity.The Simpson’s warmed us at Itchy & Scratchy land.
Wasn’t that only a 24 hour thing
Disney is trash 🤢🤮
@@Betis91 only when making the star wars sequels
aaaaaand there goes another occupational trade.
Stunt teacher?
Get out of here HIGGs.
They dont need to social distance either or isolate
Has anyone here actually seen The Terminator?
I know right?
@@smileydog5941 lmao we're all gonna die
Either that or Irobot
Generation z and some millennials didn't even know it existed it's just a meme to them lol
UA-cam movies has the full feature free with ads! :)
*takes years of work to finish stunt performer college
Stunt performer: FINALLY, I CAN WORK ON ACTUAL STUDIO NOW!
Studio: Meh...
Err.. What are you doing here?
Uhm... Shouldn't you be busting some perverts door or something? Or is this your free time?
that shits literaly been going on since the invention of the steam engine .. noob
Nah, most of them are going to either go to a circus, art shows or fight scene coreographer
in parallel universe
terminators : we need more humans for film
Bobby try to convince himself this is a "Testing" robot lol. RIP your job dude :)
"These 'Stuntronics' are autonomous"
*Terminator theme begins to play*
Ladies and Gentlemen
We are now expierencing the 4th Revolutionary Phase..
99% sure this is for Avengers Campus it looks like it’ll be in the background as Spider-Man swinging
*_"I need your clothes, your boots and your motorcycle"_*
So when robots start to replace actors, they’ll do their own stunts.
Honestly this is a great alternative for the more dangerous stunts in movies
and less money and work can be spent on cgi
Boston dynamics + Disney Imagineers = Robot Power Rangers! (Power Rangers Turbo told you)
kjdnyhmghfvb Boston dynamics + Sunrise = Gundam
Jackie Chan: that's so Unrealistic! I can do better than that
Jackie Chan is the ultimate GOAT
2029: Disney's stunt cyborgs go online, declare war on the human race, in the panic Disney tries to pull the plug but its too late. The cyborgs launch nukes at russia, russia retaliates ensureing mutal assured destruction. 6 billion lives are lost in the nuclear fire, the survivors called it Disney day, they lived to face a new nightmare, the disney terminators...
"a fictional or hypothetical person whose physical abilities are extended beyond normal human limitations by mechanical elements built into the body.".. why didn't you just say robot.
Disney: ~makes humanoid robots for real-world applications~
Boston Dynamics: *"... am I a joke to you...?"*
Queues clip of them beating robots with sticks and the robot getting back up for like five minutes if that
Fun Fact: Hollywood used to use real guns with real bullets in movies because some moviegoers didn't like that blanks were used. Movies would even advertise that real bullets were used in the film! Lots of actors died as a result.
We've come a long way when it comes to filming stunts safety haven't we?
but how many leads died tho ?
Bruce lee son brandon lee die from real bullets in the movie the crow.
@@PHlophe 1
@@PHlophe James Cagny nearly died a couple times, and he refused to do any more stunts like that. It's why the Screen Actors Guild was formed. And they used to kill animals left and right. The whole lemmings jumping off cliffs thing was manufactured in a Disney documentary where they pushed the lemmings off the cliff into the water below. I think Charlton Heston's Ten Commandments had them kill dozens of horses during the conclusion of the splitting of the Red Sea scene.
Jep, we've come a long way... And thanks to advances in CGI, pretty soon no stuntmen will ever have to risk his/her life again. Instead they'll be free to pursue their other career options; like working at McDonald's, cleaning toilets, or the exciting field of asbestos removal.
"A robot took my job!"
"What was your job?"
"Playing a robot on TV."
westworld, it was only a matter of time
Or Skynet.
@@symbian74 Well i for one welcome our new robot overlords. 😁👍.... How was that? I'm practicing.
@Mr. Wednesday No. Dune, Blade runner and Matrix taught us this would be folly.
Ajwadd Anwarr
I'm all for it.
Now I wont feel guilt for reap! 😄
I'd be okay if connor will be created
yes
I wanna buy one to became my perfect boyfriend.
YAAAS Finally I found a Detroit fan
Honestly
I knew I would eventually find a DBH related comment here somewhere
Guess my girlfriend will be a robot in 10 years :(
Well, my girlfriend is already one...since she got her first iphone :/
If she's from L.A. it's already too late
King.
So you're going to have sex with a stunt robot girlfriend, while she's doing summersaults?
My right hand is my girlfriend. Sometimes I use my left hand, to pretend, it is someone else.
haha what, you wont have gf for 10 years, *until* you get a robot one
Bobby is in denial, the robots will eventually replace his career.
Not true. A robot can't perform every human emotion and body movement.
No it can’t, at least for now because we doesn’t have android-humanoid-blade runner-level of robot yet to actually mimic human emotions and looks. I think it could be helpful for a stunt like in 4:04, because using human in that type of stun is very dangerous (remember what happened to Tom Cruise in Fallout) and using a full CGI will look less realistic. A hand to hand combat fight, complex choreographed fight and basic stunts will still be able to be played by stunt like in 2:54 because I don’t think robot could replace such complex movements.
Yeah sure... Let's see how you work a robot on a 2 minutes one shot fight scene.
No it won't lmao don't get your hype too high because robot won't replace human in any way
Dude how many times a stunt has died in a movie, he´s saying that the robot will be there to test if is safe to do it.
Why didn't this mention that mythbuster, Grant Imahara, was one of the ones that worked on this project?
"They will always need the human element." makes me believe this guy is trying to deny the future LOL
He's not wrong though
It's true! ... but neural networks will be able to provide the human element sufficiently. ^^
It’s not these robots that would take the job away, the robots would be used for testing stunts but for replacing stuntmen u might as well just cgi it completely at that point
99% sure this is for Avengers Campus it looks like it’ll be in the background as Spider-Man swinging
3020: This is how we wiped out humanity class.
2050
@@sjwalita2600 3020
@@The_Man_Who_Sold_the_World. 5020
@@sjwalita2600 We're most likely going to be a type 2 civilization by then lol
I still prefer human than these
But Disney doesn't
@ i mean, i would prefer human because its better. If this thing improve more, it will be safer.
What's gonna matter is whether the robots prefer us humans or not. Our preferences are irrelevant.
@Frenchie lol. It should be that way
No you don't, you just think its cool to have an opinion
Detroit Become Human: *say sike right now*
*Sike! That's the wrong number!*
YES.
richy lmao i was lookin for dis xd
Just a little while longer...
99% sure this is for Avengers Campus it looks like it’ll be in the background as Spider-Man swinging
Imagine these things chasing after you jumpin from buildinh to building then pinning you down and saying-"I've been trying to contact you about your cars extended warrenty..."
"Extremely aggressive Google assistant" robot uprising is now the only way humanity is allowed to go out
A huge horde of robots chase you down alleys, roads, across the country, until finally you and a group of survivors are found and captured
The robots say only one thing when on your way to a retention center
"You have +99 new messages"
That's the BEST 😂
Amazing tech but Bobby’s right, there’s only so far you can go with robots so I don’t think anyone should really fear for their jobs. We shouldn’t view new tech like this as working against humans, we need to see it as helping. At the end of the day, you can’t beat a human actor or stunt actor. There’s a flow of movement robots will never be able to create but that’s okay
Give it a year. AI is advancing faster than we can keep up with. You can create a whole AI generated cast that look more and more realistic using tools available to the public. The danger we face is that we don't want to admit it is happening and don't want to adapt or adjust.
@@cafemochavibe Genuinely thank you for commenting because my original comment is two years old and holy heck a lot has happened in the past two years with AI!
Humans work against themselves. AI didn’t create AI, humans did and if the planet is failing or X/Y/Z is failing, it’s because humans created the problem or accelerated it.
Having said that, I also think the biggest thing standing between AI and completely taking over everything (world domination, if you will) is humans. Yes the tech can exist but a lot can be said for people pushing back and recognising that while we have that technology, not everything can and should be replaced by it. Like art. If you were an honest person, why would you feel the need to create a picture out of nothing when artists literally make it their job to create such beautiful pieces with such feeling and meaning and story behind it all? Why create an image of you standing in front of the Eiffel Tower? Go and experience it yourself! If AI ever created a film and rendered faces, it would be an animation and we all know animated faces can never portray as much emotion or as good of a performance as real humans can (even Avatar wouldn’t be as impressive because they needed the humans to provide the base of the movements and facial expressions) y’know? Idk if you’ve seen them but there were a few photos entered into a photo competition and the winner actually refused to accept his 1st place prize because the photos he submitted were AI and it was all an experiment to see how far they could go. I remember looking at these photos of these two women of two different generations and thinking it felt very hollow. Those people did not exist, nor did their clothes and not even the chair one was sat on. It was in black and white but there was no real age or history present. You can’t have a real conversation about that because there’s nothing to talk about aside from how the image was created. Tell me if that’s a world you want to live in where everything is like that. No real history, no life, no adventure, no anything. But once again, humans control the robots. If you let them take over, they’ll take over.
I swear they will be robotic assassins in the future
At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if they already exist
Drone strikes.
Guaranteed!
WTF
already done in warzone..
robot and drone bomber autonomous target
No stuntman will get injured or lose their life. This is the way forward.
@Morgan Allen One can't risk human lives. These people could be shifted to some other work. And there will always be shots where real human would be required. But more dangerous stunts can be off-loaded to these robots
@Morgan Allen so you want them to continue to risk their lives?
@Morgan Allen Stunt acting is extremely risky. The only benefit Stunt actors will get is that they will not risk their lives. There will always be real Stunt actors required in films. And it's not like these robots will replace actors overnight, it will be a gradual process.
Akash Yadav there will be no stuntmen in the future or the ones that exist will be very low paid. “Retraining someone” massive time/monetary investment on the individual’s part, so midway through a career you start over both in progression and debt.
That means no stuntmen to lose their lives.
Sounds like an amazing piece of technology, until it’s not.
By then, it will be too late.
The robots will be doing the stunts, have the appearance of humans, and deliver the lines with better emotion then the real actors.
Estevan Torres Not true, think about it.
A robot could cry on demand or laugh. Robots do not need to feel any sort of emotion, they do whatever they are programmed too. Hollywood would not need hire expensive actors at 10 million dollars a movie. They could build their own actors to whatever specs they want and make movies at a fraction of the cost without the need to feed actors, provide insurance, or pay them.
But Nicholas Cage has been on film for the longest time now
TheTruthIsGonnaHurt only doubt robots can ever convey emotions to the degree humans can without reaching true AI. Then they’d still lack the huge number of muscles in human faces that are essential to nonverbal cues. There’s just too much complexity and nuance to human emotions and expressions, way beyond crying and smiling. At best they’ll just be so deeep in uncanny valley that in turn produces the opposite affect.
I'm skeptical that robots will fully replace actors, at least movie stars. Movie stars bring more than just their ability to act to the table, they bring their star power: their ability to fill seats in theaters due to their admiration and fan base. People want to see the real DiCapprio, Hemsworth, Bale, Johansson. The human element will always be a major part of that aspect of the art I believe. Robots will also be able to create amazing painting and music in the not too distant future, but that art will feel stale and devoid of the humanity that makes it meaningful once you learn it was created by an emotionless machine operating on algorithms. I think a very significant amount of people will ultimately reject robotics as a replacement for human art.
However, I think this stuntman is a bit delusional. Sure, knowing that a real person performed that stunt carries some weight in how we appreciate movies, but I doubt the majority really would consider it all that much when deciding on what movies to see. Eventually, even the majority of background actors will be replaced with either robotics or CGI renderings.
The Stars will be safe, but the working-class people of the industry will suffer the brunt of this advancing technology.
A convincing great human acting performance is probably _literally the last thing_ robots would do better than humans.
They've been using CGI stunt replacements for years and you think Stunt performers are worried about robots now? Those things look to be designed for attractions where they have to do a stunt 3 shows an hour, 365 days a year and require little maintenance or down time and can be reset quickly for the next show.
The age of Men is over. The time of the robot has come.
ziljin get outa here robot!
Just men?
@@chocoburgersenpai1627 Dont. Just dont start this... Lets just assume he meant the human species.
The future doesn't need us.
@@DavidThomas-fb8bq Yeah you are right about that.
As much as how I’m scared these robots are going to replace the real stuntmen, I’m quite glad they invent it.
Because these robots are used as an assessment for possible ‘deadly’ situation that could actually land the actors and stuntmen into hostipal (best: alive😁) or deathbed (worst: death☠️) and help stunt director make it to safer for human.
Besides, all epic blockbuster needs human element to make it look natural instead of cheap green-screen low budget movies.
Plus, it took half the time needed to make an epic blockbuster.
Imagine that, instead of waiting for a near decade for it to finish and aired in cinema, now we only need half the time for it 🤩 and save more lives.
b king That’s so true for my country’s movies anyway not USA.
You haven’t seen my country’s blockbuster it is the worse with a lot of actors and actresses always end up in hospital every time.
Even the CGI is the absolute worst, you can clearly see it was green screen.
How soon will they get autonomous CEO's?
They already do look up how robot servers trade stocks for huge wall street banks.
@@philsterlingpejcinovic4376 Well, CEOs is the position of the slave owner. When robots become CEO's that means Skynet has been created, and that's when the robot uprising occurs. Until then, robots won't be CEOs.
@@naejin probably
Well if you consider jarvis and friday to be the CEO of Stark industries, then probably.
And here we are with these robots as swinging Spider-Man on the Avengers campus
I had no idea this would be used as Spiderman in Avengers Campus
This looks like it could make a lot of stuntmen jobless
Not really. The programming will took huge amount of time for each stunt . Not only that, the cost of this type of tech will be a hell lot. Maybe it will be used only in highly risked stunts.
And create twice as many new jobs for stunt robot technicians...
No, this will save a lot of stuntman from having to endanger their lives. These will be used primarily in cases where it is too dangerous for stuntmen.
Nah. While they can perform stunts perfectly i think it would be costly and pointless for them to perform smaller stunts and action sequences.
as if there are that many professional stunt doubles. the economy will survive!!
So Pretty much "real" Age of Ultron.... got it.
Yeahh.. But we don't have superheroes like Steve Rogers, Hulk or Thor to fight them...
i love how "Detroit become human" are slowly become more and more accurate
I'm not here to see robots do "Death defying acts" simply because that is an oxymoron.
Prepare to see a bunch of Stunt man complaining robots took their jobs
TRU3_P0NZ If your stunt man your job is never safe but we can destroy thousands of robots and nobody gets hurt
THE BUDDHA 420
Robot:*confused screaming*
99% sure this is for Avengers Campus it looks like it’ll be in the background as Spider-Man swinging
I miss Jackie Chan nearly killing himself multiple times over his career...
This is actually scary...give it another 10 years and some mad man to weaponize it, and we are all in trouble. 😳
Is anyone freaked out/suprised by the fact that they didn't even know these existed?? Because I sure didn't!
3:30 the truest statement ever 😂
I feel it's about time we stop making humans redundant in the name of progress.
sadly , not gonna happen. the world is gonna be completely automated in 20 years time. with sophisticated & highly advanced robots and AI actually running our day to day lives by themselves without manual input. and its not for "progress" but for absolute control & profit.
easy to say when your job isn't being taken over by one
Good luck with that mindset
@@jasonlee2438 probably not
@@AxPlayOn yep taking away jobs is very good🙄
they have a great way to go before this "Acrobots" can match the versatility of a human body. It's like what happen with Gollum in TLOTR and with Tippett's stop motion Dinosaurs on JP. Different emerging technologies merging to boost traditional methods enhancing each other. Body doubles shouldn't be afraid: Robots can mimic certain acrobatics but they're still pretty blind when it comes to interacting with regular stuff. They need interfaces to relate to space and locations and things need to be narrowed down to ones an zeroes so they can understand. And I'm afraid that isn't as cheap and profitable as real stunt actors. In fact the more complex and interactive more expensive. There are very complex acrobatics like the ones used on "capoeira" they just cant mimic and I'm sure there's still a decade or two before robots match that.
It’s all good, til they have guns and you’re under a curfew
This is Ultron behind the scene. Slowly Replacing human works with robots😂😂😂.
This was 2 years ago, I’m just seeing this for the first time... I wonder how far they’ve come since?
No joke though, stickman is adorable.
From the name to the actual backflipping stick. They keep trying to make things more human to seem relatable but that just makes them creepy and uncanny. Keep it wholesome.
I want to be a stunt double when I am an adult. Hopefully these robots won’t eliminate stunt people. 😕
you need to be quite young to be in this profession.
Lechiffresix six I know. I’m only 15 right now
you better hit the unemployment line because being a stunt man is a job of the past young one
They'll be eliminating everyone...
Same here. 17 now. Stunt work is definitely a consideration right now. Damn these confounded machines.
Who is here today when Avengers campus opened and the Spider-Man stunt-tronic now currently operating 🙋♂️
I literally JUST put two and two together and came running to UA-cam 😂
Let’s make them act as well.
Who needs actors when a robot can do it.
“Let’s make robots live life too and eliminate humans. Robots can lead lives better than humans”
God this is the worst nightmare turning into a reality. We are so focussed on future that we may end up not having one.
He is just being WAY TOO optimistic, that robot, is his replacement 100% for sure.
imagine in the future humans are planning to take over the earth again and one of them said “ we have to take that fxking mickey mouse company down”
“Can stick a perfect landing every time” shows footage of robots landing on their face
Wow, this is crazy. Seeing as how this video came out 2 years ago I wonder how far their robot tech has come now.
Or how much they're keeping from us.
They look impressive but those are not the scary ones. The scary ones can balance on uneven ground etc, the scary ones are able to be used in war. *That* should concern people.
RIP Grant Imahara, who apparently was working on this project.
everyone getting so scared about a “robot uprising” and them taking over the world, meanwhile i’m just admiring what this awesome technology is capable of accomplishing
Me too, like this is so cool!
This is such a pathetic comment :P
@@pderham26 How is it pathetic?
Just wait a couple years and Detroit Become Human will become a reality
What people don't realize about stunting is that there is actual acting involved in selling the stunts and creating a more enjoyable/"relatable" scene.
and here is rA9
exactly
Smh
Omg lol Detroit become human
Actually they use it for Spider-Man in the new avengers campus
Bruh this video was published 2 years ago, how would they know that
Pros and cons
Pro: reduces injuries /
con: Less work for stunt performers
con: The robots rise up and take over
Stuntmen: “They took are JAWBS!!!”
I really hate it when these robots are “threatening” jobs. Like yes, we used to have people hand sew all our clothes before machines, or working in factories on production lines. So what If you are worried about robots doing a job? Its gonna happen anyways. Use your human ingenuity and do something the robot can’t
I think it's cool on a safety level. But I think the stunt man has nothing to be worried about as far as his job is concerned because u can't create human ingenuity and Tht robot would not be cheap to maintain and u could pay a human less than it would cost.
Never say never...
@@henrytep8884
That's right. "Never" is a long time.
@@henrytep8884 exactly but why you saying never 😂🤦♀️
When robots takes over, don’t be scared, we got Keanu Reeves
We got Will Smith!
but i bet robots will have clones of us to turn us insane
It's adorable how he thinks he won't be replaced