⏰ Time Stamps ⏰ 24:09 - Judge Enters OPJ 49:18 - Ryan Kelly - Senior Special Agent with SLED - obtained buccal swabs of several people 52:58 - Rachel Nguyen - DNA Analyst for SLED - Forensic Serology 1:36:58 - Cross Examination of Rachel Nguyen 1:52:40 - Break 2:14:09 - State Calls Sarah Zapata - Forensic Scientist in DNA @ SLED 3:45:31 - Lunch 5:13:37 - Judge returns 5:16:17 - Cross Examination of Agent Zapata 6:17:19 - Break 6:35:06 - Judge Returns 6:39:37 - State Calls Dr. Ellen Riemer - Medical Examiner 7:22:33 - Break after graphic ME images are shown to the jury. 7:34:41 - Resume Medical Examiner’s Direct Testimony
He can be visibly upset and still be guilty. He knows he butchered his family and is forced to look at the mess he made. They are going to nail him in that jury room. He is toast
I have a horrible feeling this evil murderer is gonna walk, all because of one (maybe 2) stupid juror(s). In fact, some current polls are only at 60% guilty. It's BS the jury has to unanimous to convict! 😡😠 This guy lies perhaps more than the devil himself!
Just asking but how can you tell he is visibly upset as I look at him he seems angry and as the saying goes if looks could kill he scares me just looking at him
@@dottiebracewell6503 It must be some sort of a coping mechanism that kicks in whenever there's testimony about Maggie & Paul's murder that causes AM to start bobbing his head back & forth and the fact he knows his son's final split seconds alive most likely would have been knowing his father just shot him as he went for the door before his father blew out his brain just as his wife's final split seconds alive was most likely knowing her husband had just shot her twice as she buckled over before he delivered the final two kill shots.
@@dottiebracewell6503 hi! I mean the red face. the weird twitching, the frown - idk if it is an act (prob is) or he is dealing with what he knows deep down is true which is he shot to death those two people..
Alex heaved when witnessing the autopsy photos . Yes sir , it is SICKENING what you did to your son , and wife. May you receive no mercy in sentencing and when you leave this Earth .
@@texmexgal because It’s obvious , with all the evidence I’ve seen? Points to him as the murderer. It’s pretty clear to see once you piece everything together .
I think his gagging is either feigned, or now that he sees the horror of what he did, he is actually reacting because of what he did. Just because he panicked over all of his misdeads coming to light, it doesn't mean he isn't affected now. The crazy thing is, he's going to jail for his financial crimes, so killing them wouldn't make that for away. He killed them for nothing! It didn't save him from doing time, losing his license to practice law, and selling everything to try and pay people back. Killing his family members is beyond horrific, and screwing over so many people, including one of his best friends is terrible as well. I think he's a sociopath. And, I'm not convinced that he ever had a drug addiction.
@@T3361t all of it . He was at the kennels , he lied … pls go and Watch these fantastic four men called The Behaviour Panel.. look for their latest upload on this case. 👌🏾
They keep going on about, Alex not being able to see the autopsy photos. DUH!! HE DOESNT NEED TO SEE THEM BECAUSE HE SAW THE BODIES AFTER They’re SHOT !! It makes sense that they knew the killer, and Paul may have been in shock seeing his dad shoot him . And it’s more likely to think Alex shot Paul first because Maggie was not strong enough to do anything. Maggie saw her son killed and fled as she was chased and shot down trying to get away after witnessing her son die , she also has to be in shock at the time also while trying to flee I’m sure she had to be in shock 😮😱
How do you shoot your child, the baby you held and rocked, with a shotgun from 2 to 3 feet away? I cannot even fathom. I so wanted the defense to have an alibi. Anything to prove a father could not do this to his child but it never came.
She’s clearly completely into her job. After wrapping up Paul’s findings, she said ‘Well, at least he still had his face.’ A pall over the room was cast. Judge called a break!
If he checked his son and wife before he called 911, how come he doesn't have any blood on his hands or clothes? He's a snake and being an attorney he knows how to get rid of evidence!
People always thought highly of sled. I am just a regular south Carolina citizen, who's following the Murdaugh trial. It look and sound like Alex was in charge of sled and the police when he call them to his home. Alex had help murdering his family, to kill them and to wash all trades of blood from the shooting. Sled just don't no how bad this murder make them look. No wonder the world is watching this trial . Alex help sled and the police botched the investigation.there is so much that don't make common sense about this trial. Put Alex on the stand, give him a lie detector test, see what happens.
Alex is giving a dirty look at Creighton Waters Prosecutor while Dr. Riemer explained the injury of Paul and Maggie Murdaugh from the gun shot wounds. I saw him how angry he was and he never shed a single tear from his face. In my opinion, he is a pathetic liar and how greedy he was about the money issues. Greedy=Evil 👺👹 Alex is very lucky that he didn’t get a death penalty in South Carolina.
He just needs to confess and do the work to heal as much as can be achieved here on earth. I don’t know what could have broke in him to do that to his family but this coupled with his history of manipulating his loved ones with no remorse clearly indicates he has serious mental issues. Nothing is above forgiveness but man he has to come clean. The whole Murdaugh story is so tragic and sad.
When Court TV have an advert and they play the recording and the operator says quote "are they still breathing"? he says "no ma'am". I remember reading somewhere that when a perpetrator is overly polite they normally do this to make themself come across as nice when in fact his reaction should be horrified at finding the bodies of his wife and Child.
Most ppl would be wanting to know if they are alive and he kept asking if they were dead!!! Like he had to make sure they were dead so they can’t tell it
Dear Esteemed Sir, Please bear in mind that just because it's written in a book, that doesn't mean it's true. For example: The Bible, The 9/11 Report, any book written by Jordan Peterson, any book written by Mickey Mouse, etc. Yours Sincerely, etc etc
🐩🐩🐶 Listening to the dogs so stressed is very sad.They witnessed the murders, heard everything, then seeing the place with a lot of lights, strangers, barking and nobody calming them , the lying murderer talking about everything except what had happened , calling everyone to avoid being questioned👤👥
I remember he said to the officer at the location right after the 911 call present he goes “ Are they officially dead” who in their right mind would say that
@@GrumpyMeow-Meow maybe not that masterful, since there's lots of commentators that aren't buying it. He was good at fraud, but not as good as the people behind 2008, because they all got away with it.
@@GrumpyMeow-Meow true, true - but a few people for 20+ years is chickenfeed in comparison to the truly masterful manipulators who've been fooling millions of people for 2023 - 313 = 1,700 years !!
did he eat Mexican food before this witness? - he just looks constipated and sweaty which clearly was his intention here for show. He clearly thinks everyone is stupid. We sir are not stupid. Your'e Fckd
The female prosecutor (skinny one w/ dark hair) is horrible, especially during the questioning of the DNA agent!! They should have had someone up there to at least be able to form questions so that the testimony made a little more sense, but she couldn’t even do that. At one point she said “so just take all of that and just put it together” and then just quickly moved on! Are you kidding me! It was like the perfect storm having Dumb and Dumber try to explain DNA testimony to the jury so that it made sense! 🤦🏾♀️
They don’t need murder weapons to convict. Having a body isn’t even necessary sometimes. Logic, people. A confluence of circumstantial like we’ve seen. Motive isn’t needed, but juries like them. Just cuz you wouldn’t kill over $ doesn’t mean he didn’t.
Alex is having a hard time seeing the pathologist showing diagrams and explaining the deaths because it's hard for him to see what " HE DID TO HIS WIFE AND SON "...
May he live with the images for the rest of his life of his wife and child’s last look at the ultimate betrayal from someone they loved and trusted to protect them.
Why is he constantly making all those noises with his sinuses and nose and mouth? It’s so incredibly gross and it just seems like he’s trying REALLY HARD to make everyone believe he’s crying
I think it is because it is so difficult to believe he could do this to his son that a part of your thinking just won't allow you to believe he is guilty.
@@donmoore7785 I think they're referring to the fact that most of his brain landed down by his legs. But, make no mistake, what was done to Maggie was also horrible. I think it's possible that he took the opportunity to shoot Paul while Maggie was at the other end of the kennels. Then, when Maggie heard the shotgun blast, she was heading to the front. Alex dropped the shotgun, picked up the rifle, and probably lay in wait and shot her. It's just a theory, and by no means set in stone.
My question is..if the unidentified dna under Maggie's nails was so insignificant...WHY NOT test the remaining nails that weren't originally tested to see if there might be more dna for testing?? Why only test 2 or 3 nails?? Why not ALL 5 on each hand? Not like it's that many more and those nails could provide more pertinent information! There is some sloppy work going on in this case...never know what you'll hear next to make you shake your head..🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️
Am I crazy or did I not hear someone early on in this trail testify that they saw brown hair in Maggie's hand at the morgue at autopsy? I've never heard anything else about it and I'm very curious about this brown hair...🤔🤔
I stg if i ever hear the words unidentified and unrelated again, i might punch a wall 💀💀💀 Burnt face attorney questioning the DNA analyzer was really pissing me off. All that swaying back and forth bruh. Stand tf still 💀
Alex m’s face reflects that of a guilty man upset about the horrendous things he has done, there is no time for him to leave the murder scene and not hear the shots , he did it himself period
I believe some of the jury said “it’s horrible” then the ME says “It’s horrible, I know”. 😢 then they take a break… wonder if that’s because it was too much (graphic) for the jury to see both victims at once.
Agent: the way we test for dna is to get grandma to run a marathon sitting on her couch holding two types of flower in a cup singing the same song, and the less we have to say, the longer we take to say it and the most important thing i have to tell you is that i put it in a paper bag with fifteen octillion unrelated unidentified individuals and then i write my initials on it and i will say this over and over again crackling the plastic until you run screaming out of the room pretending to have covid because you can't take it any more. Counsel: What's an octillion? Is it like my stupid haircut? Agent: Sigh,,, How the hell should i know?! i just follow the recipe, and besides - bigger sigh - i failed math at school, so gabbling on about swabbing a dirty old man's shorts is the only job i can get. Audience: There's only 8 billion people on the whole planet, so who the f are these three hundred and twenty-eight gerglugillion plus or minus two unrelated uniformed unidentified uninformed individuals? are they autoerotic autonomous re-entry space alien android blue raincoat-wearing robots smelling like Elon Musk in the rutting season? Judge: zzzzzzzz.... What?? Where am i? Isn't it time for tea, yet? These prezels are making me thirsty! ...... one cup of tea later .... Cross-examiner #4: this is my big moment on telly, but i can't think of anything sensible to ask you, so let's fill up the time counting and adding up scissor cuts that have no evidential value whatsoever - isn't this fun?! Agent: they are all unidentified unrelated uninteresting negative results Cross-examiner #4: let me ask you endless pointless questions about things that have nothing to do with you or your analysis Alex: Jesus wept, if i'd known i would have to sit through all this i would never have shot them!
Oh, man! I just made a joking comment on the person near the bench coughing like they had COVID. I had no idea that someone actually did. It reminded me that I need to get the next booster. I hope that the other jurors aren't infected as well.
@@lyndaczika6327 Every trial has someone coughing, but this one is insane. Now we know why, at least in part, but there's someone near the clerk who has been coughing constantly. Someone in the comments said she was gone, but then came back, and she's been coughing ever since. Since she's near the judge, I'm assuming that she had to pass a covid test before coming back, but I don't know for sure. The judge seems to be concerned about it. I don't think I could watch this a second time.
@@zxy78267 there was a point in which it was almost constant!! So much at one point a witness couldn’t even hear one of the questions because someone was talking coughing!!!
@@lyndaczika6327 This isn't the first (high-profile) trial I've watch where someone in the audience has hacked away incessantly throughout the trial, distracting from the proceedings & drowning out the testimony in the process. I'm not surprised some people feel entitled to be ignorant enough to come to court and cough throughout which is why the court should feel obligated to remove such ignoramuses from the courtroom.
You want to keep the pictures private!! WELL THEN MAYBE HE SHOULDN’T HAVE FARKING BLEW THEIR HEADS OFF WITH A DAMN SHOTGUN!!!! smdh. And AM upset? Yea, cause he got himself caught!
it's a good question - the white shirt is clearly not the one he was wearing during his interview, nor is it the one Miss Shelly said he was wearing that morning, because that one was "sea-foam" colour. And if it had been covered in blood and guts and brains, he wouldn't have left it lying in the laundry basket, which is i guess where they found it. So i reckon it's what they call in the trade: "a red herring" - just like the blue raincoat - a false trail for detectives to chase that goes nowhere.
@@Silly.Old.Sisyphus The white shirt is actually the one he had on when cops arrived on scene & in the patrol car interview (the same one they collected for evidence) The seafoam shirt was most certainly the one he was really wearing during the murders (since he was wearing it in the Snapchat video mere hours b4 he killed them). That's where he fukd up. But, yeah, that one conveniently disappeared. All this nonsense the defense is saying clears him, finding nothing on this white t-shirt is just that...BS! Obviously, the exact reason he changed b4 calling the cops. He knew they'd be collecting his clothes. Here's a thought though, if he did as he told the cops n checked/touched his wife n son, why no blood. I know, I know...b/c he didn't have to, he just took their last breath. Notice the cops body cam when they arrive, he begins right off the bat delivering the motive of someone else, then gives his aliby, then asks if they've checked on his wife n son. None of his story adds up!! He guilty AF!!
@@sandyquino2015 we haven't been told where the white shirt came from, but it is a reasonable guess that it was the one he was wearing when the cops came. let's imagine you are the murderer, calling the cops... would you be so daft as to have them come with you soaked in gunpowder residue, victim's blood, and etc? Or would you nip back home, have a quick shower, and put on an old shirt you had worn the day before, so it wouldn't look like a freshly-laundered and ironed one? And then drive to your mother's house, and do silly things like with the raincoat and lying on your mother's bed to make sure Shelly remembers your antics so she doesn't pay attention to the the time, and then drive back and call the cops. as far as i know, only his voice is on the snapchat video; if his image had been on it, you can be sure it would have been centre stage. so we can't know what he was wearing, but it could well have been the seafoam one with the collar that Shelly tucked in, so her dna would be on it too... what does all this mean? it means the prosecution was off the rails to bring up the white shirt, and the blue raincoat, following red herring trails, perhaps just as Alex intended. On the other hand, maybe they had to go through the motions, because ev everyone had seen the white shirt and Shelly had talked about the tarp/raincoat. It was significant that both sides used their most junior counsel for all witnesses today (including the cheerful Medical Examiner who behaved as if she were teaching a class of junior high school students), which means those witnesses are not important. PS. i could lie on the ground, covered in blood, and you could come and roll me over, without getting any of my blood on your shirt. You can just roll me over with your foot, or just your hands. No problem. But it's more likely he didn't roll Paul over and only said he touched them to give a plausible reason for their dna being on him, in case it was.
@@Silly.Old.Sisyphus Im saying hes guilty. He changed shirts (from the seafoam striped shirt) after he murdered them, then changed into the clean white t-shirt then lastly he called the cops! Are we both talking about the white shirt he had on that was shown on the reponding officers body cam? The one examined for dna n blood? It was testified to the other day, that cops took him up to his house that evening and made him take off his shorts, shirt, shoes n collected them in paper bags the night of murders. I personally believe he changed clothes after he murdered n b4 calling cops. I suspect he probably burried/ hid that seafoam shirt someplace to burn later (the green one he's seen wearing in the snapchat video recorded that same day). I'm also saying his lies aren't fooling me (all 1000 of them) nor is his lies poor acting.
@@sandyquino2015 i'm convinced he's guilty too, but not because of his shirts. i thought they didn't find any blood on his white shirt, but they did find Paul and Maggie dna - which is normal for a family. i didn't remember the seafoam one was striped, and i don't remember seeing a snapchat video with him wearing a green one - and i would have guessed seafoam = green anyway! where's this snapchat video you're talking about? can you give me a url?
Absolutely none of that DNA analysis told me anything conclusive whatsoever. Imho she didn't explain it very clearly nor gave simpler breakdown when asked. Almost as if she didn't want to give outright names to X probabilities. She gives 3 scenarios "this more so than that" but when asked to say which scenario is highest probability, she didn't state which dna combination, she simply repeated the known + unknown contributor(s) as if it was all three comparison. Poor witness, poor attorney (seems she didn't grasp it herself either or she absolutely would have made it clear for the jury if it was supposed to be their "gotcha" moment imo.
if none of her testimony tells you anything conclusive then she did a good job! Because the dna evidence provided nothing conclusive to conclude, other than that it was more likely that at some time in the past Paul and/or Maggie had rubbed against Alex's shirt than that 2 strangers had done so, which tells you absolutely buggerall, so your inference is spot on, so her testimony was accurate. :)
It was horrible. MORE THAN LESS OF A NENOMILLECONDAIRE TO... Basically, NOTHING HERE< NOTHING THERE. BUT..., a little bit here, and possibly but not limited to there. SMH
That's the way they're all trained to answer. If they give a personal opinion, like, "Alex Murdaugh's DNA was found here or there," it could cause a mistrial. They have to be so carefully neutral that in the end, it seems like they said nothing.
@@osiris_blanche I had no idea what was going on. Why couldn’t they just have given the results in “English”? This was like listening to someone speak another language…The female prosecutor was completely lost.
The female prosecutor is horrible!! They should have had someone up there to at least be able to form questions so that the testimony made a little more sense, but she couldn’t even do that. At one point she said “so just take all of that and just put it together” and then just quickly moved on! Are you kidding me! It was like the perfect storm having Dumb and Dumber try to explain DNA testimony to the jury so that it made sense! 🤦🏾♀️
Im fascinated with Dr. Riemer, super smart, yet down to earth professional lady. 'Poot treated her with condescending disrespect. She's so much smarter than the renowned Dick (Harpootlian). Shame on him.
I wonder why they can't have the juror who's sick watch it on a screen somewhere else. I guess that's just not policy but it makes more sense then bringing in a completely new person
@@GrumpyMeow-Meow both lawyers were concerned about the amount of people in court. They were passing out masks yesterday. I have a feeling they’ll cut the people down so they’re 6’ apart I hope they disinfected everywhere the jury sits and breaks
@@hdettore I watched, but I don't know what they're talking about. I think I'll wait until the end of the day, and then come back and and check the time stamp.
Explain why a DNA expert who researched and included articles on hemotrace can’t explain a study which clearly shows amount of blood in relation to amount of LCV = reliability of test. Then explain why the prosecution seems incompetent on this issue. If they don’t get it how can a jury get it. Why are tax dollars paying these salaries?
This family is so hated its not impossible that Paul & Mag was murdered to frame Alex and knowing they have no money and best pple on their side, the justice system isn't always gonna get you justice. and one will likely see this family suffer immensely than just a slap on the wrist. SOOOO, it is NOT surprising to see comments here that don't believe Alex committed this.
Paul was looking at the shooter on the second shot. The shooter was outside the shed on the right side of the doorway, squatting up next to the shed. As soon as Paul looked the shooter pulled the trigger with the butt of the stock resting on the ground.
Why is Dick walking around crowding her? I get he wants to see the screen but Take a Seat & Park It! Always trying to deflect & cause confusion. I loved the way Dr Reemer destroyed Dick. He can’t hold a candle to her. He looked like a fool trying to suggest either suicide or Contact Head Shot. Paul’s brain wouldn’t of flown out his skull & hit the ceiling before landing Intact on the floor by him if the shot was from the top down. No Way.
My guess is it's possibly law enforcement, to exclude all officers that could have possibly left their dna during confiscation of weapons. But I can't remember specifically who it was. That name does sound familiar.
As people we can not predict how someone will act in grief... Please people we all can assume how we will act but when this kinda crime happens to you we as people really don't know how we will act. I've seen people treat death in many ways like falling out crying, passing out, joking , concerns for others, but one thing is inevitable is weight loss after the fact of a 20 year addiction. Weight loss is from grief not drugs. Come on let's get real with true life....
@@brendadawnjones why don’t they just record it and type it later? Or at least give the lady something to tie it to the back of her head so she doesn’t have to hold it the whole time!
few days to come up with his own theories and he was probably thinking it had to be two shooters bc two different guns were used - thus a reason he may have said "they" but talk about WEAK if the prosecution thinks this inaudible word of some kind is a gotcha moment - especially when they didn't get it at the time to ask follow-up question to make use of the moment for clarity and didn't arrest him at that moment - if they really hear him confess. sounds like they hired a crazy person that murdered them.
Alex says "they" ("did him so bad") in the police car BEFORE he knows two guns were used in the murders. I think this is a critical moment... he used 2 guns to make it appear there were two people.
@@PalosVerdesLife maybe he didn't know 2 guns yet but I think he may have heard that or thought of it anyway but still inconclusive bc I don't, and alot of people don't, hear "they" - so unless you are an eye witness to the murders and you saw him pull out two rifles like he is in the movie the Matrix all of the sudden .. you don't know what happened just based on this one tiny garbaled nonsense
The problem here is not branching outside your little box area of science. You don’t consider what the source of DNA is before presenting it in court? How did that tshirt get destroyed. Too many people in different depts doing different things and not actually looking beyond reading a result. Laziness. A DNA expert should understand what the objective is and be able to explain that in court. We tested this for touch, hair, blood deposited here and this was result it’s 99% or 50% accurate. The DNA expert should know the effects of other lab chemicals and test on there own work. Listening to SLED process. I would question every case involving DNA. In fact I would shut down that unit. It proved incompetent in every way in this case and so many others. Steven smith, several cases involving so called judges. There is no true oversight. Sick and sad.
@@Foenem521 definitely not and they are not losing the case 😂😂😂 I hope he does take the stand lol I’m sure the sociopath crooked lawyer can explain how he lied when the video time stamped shows him there at the time of the murders 💁🏻♀️🥳
@@Foenem521 get it right HE HAS NOTHING TO LOSE BUT TO FURTHER INCRIMINATE HIMSELF AS HE HAS ALREADY ADMITTED TO KILLING HIS SON AND TRYING TO RECREATE SOMETHING… LIKE A MURDER SCENE
⏰ Time Stamps ⏰
24:09 - Judge Enters OPJ
49:18 - Ryan Kelly - Senior Special Agent with SLED - obtained buccal swabs of several people
52:58 - Rachel Nguyen - DNA Analyst for SLED - Forensic Serology
1:36:58 - Cross Examination of Rachel Nguyen
1:52:40 - Break
2:14:09 - State Calls Sarah Zapata - Forensic Scientist in DNA @ SLED
3:45:31 - Lunch
5:13:37 - Judge returns
5:16:17 - Cross Examination of Agent Zapata
6:17:19 - Break
6:35:06 - Judge Returns
6:39:37 - State Calls Dr. Ellen Riemer - Medical Examiner
7:22:33 - Break after graphic ME images are shown to the jury.
7:34:41 - Resume Medical Examiner’s Direct Testimony
😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
He can be visibly upset and still be guilty. He knows he butchered his family and is forced to look at the mess he made. They are going to nail him in that jury room. He is toast
I have a horrible feeling this evil murderer is gonna walk, all because of one (maybe 2) stupid juror(s). In fact, some current polls are only at 60% guilty. It's BS the jury has to unanimous to convict! 😡😠 This guy lies perhaps more than the devil himself!
I agree.
Just asking but how can you tell he is visibly upset as I look at him he seems angry and as the saying goes if looks could kill he scares me just looking at him
@@dottiebracewell6503 It must be some sort of a coping mechanism that kicks in whenever there's testimony about Maggie & Paul's murder that causes AM to start bobbing his head back & forth and the fact he knows his son's final split seconds alive most likely would have been knowing his father just shot him as he went for the door before his father blew out his brain just as his wife's final split seconds alive was most likely knowing her husband had just shot her twice as she buckled over before he delivered the final two kill shots.
@@dottiebracewell6503 hi! I mean the red face. the weird twitching, the frown - idk if it is an act (prob is) or he is dealing with what he knows deep down is true which is he shot to death those two people..
Alex heaved when witnessing the autopsy photos . Yes sir , it is SICKENING what you did to your son , and wife. May you receive no mercy in sentencing and when you leave this Earth .
But how do you really know he did it. Just curious that's. All
@@texmexgal because It’s obvious , with all the evidence I’ve seen? Points to him as the murderer. It’s pretty clear to see once you piece everything together .
@@LadyChann can you be specific which evidence is the heaviest for you? Genuinely curious..
I think his gagging is either feigned, or now that he sees the horror of what he did, he is actually reacting because of what he did. Just because he panicked over all of his misdeads coming to light, it doesn't mean he isn't affected now. The crazy thing is, he's going to jail for his financial crimes, so killing them wouldn't make that for away. He killed them for nothing! It didn't save him from doing time, losing his license to practice law, and selling everything to try and pay people back. Killing his family members is beyond horrific, and screwing over so many people, including one of his best friends is terrible as well. I think he's a sociopath. And, I'm not convinced that he ever had a drug addiction.
@@T3361t all of it . He was at the kennels , he lied … pls go and Watch these fantastic four men called The Behaviour Panel.. look for their latest upload on this case. 👌🏾
They keep going on about, Alex not being able to see the autopsy photos. DUH!! HE DOESNT NEED TO SEE THEM BECAUSE HE SAW THE BODIES AFTER They’re SHOT !! It makes sense that they knew the killer, and Paul may have been in shock seeing his dad shoot him . And it’s more likely to think Alex shot Paul first because Maggie was not strong enough to do anything. Maggie saw her son killed and fled as she was chased and shot down trying to get away after witnessing her son die , she also has to be in shock at the time also while trying to flee I’m sure she had to be in shock 😮😱
That’s a little act to make it seem like he can’t handle seeing the gore. He created it. It’s all an defense strategy act.
He has seen them. The screen would be visible by everyone sitting behind him. That’s why they put up the cardboard. But he has seen all the photos.
How do you shoot your child, the baby you held and rocked, with a shotgun from 2 to 3 feet away? I cannot even fathom. I so wanted the defense to have an alibi. Anything to prove a father could not do this to his child but it never came.
That ME has a gift for teaching.
She’s clearly completely into her job. After wrapping up Paul’s findings, she said ‘Well, at least he still had his face.’ A pall over the room was cast. Judge called a break!
@@tresasauer7129 Omgosh
I'm so impressed by Dr. Reimer. She's intell8gent, interesting, and fiesty
If he checked his son and wife before he called 911, how come he doesn't have any blood on his hands or clothes? He's a snake and being an attorney he knows how to get rid of evidence!
He sits there shaking his head like he agrees with them
Not one tear from Alex or Buster ....wtf
Buster looks totally disinterested and bored. I wonder if he's a sociopath, too.
@@zxy78267 I think he’s a sociopath also. Just weird.
I want to take that door behind the judge, sand it down, and repaint it. Those cracks are driving me crazy.
And here I thought it was just me.
Ahhh, I've found my people!!! 💗
You have issues.
He is shaking his head like yeah that’s the way it was
People always thought highly of sled. I am just a regular south Carolina citizen, who's following the Murdaugh trial. It look and sound like Alex was in charge of sled and the police when he call them to his home. Alex had help murdering his family, to kill them and to wash all trades of blood from the shooting. Sled just don't no how bad this murder make them look. No wonder the world is watching this trial . Alex help sled and the police botched the investigation.there is so much that don't make common sense about this trial. Put Alex on the stand, give him a lie detector test, see what happens.
Alex is giving a dirty look at Creighton Waters Prosecutor while Dr. Riemer explained the injury of Paul and Maggie Murdaugh from the gun shot wounds. I saw him how angry he was and he never shed a single tear from his face. In my opinion, he is a pathetic liar and how greedy he was about the money issues. Greedy=Evil 👺👹
Alex is very lucky that he didn’t get a death penalty in South Carolina.
This judge is dynamite!
I love his voice.. his pronunciation of "jurors" is so cute!!
i'm a brit, so i love an accent lol This trial is epic!! ;o)
@@truecrime_and_everything_else ew
He just needs to confess and do the work to heal as much as can be achieved here on earth. I don’t know what could have broke in him to do that to his family but this coupled with his history of manipulating his loved ones with no remorse clearly indicates he has serious mental issues. Nothing is above forgiveness but man he has to come clean. The whole Murdaugh story is so tragic and sad.
Hapoonian better figure out how to pull a rabbit out of a hat😅 He knows Alex did it you can see his face.
I agree. He can't look at him and looks more and more dejected
When Court TV have an advert and they play the recording and the operator says quote "are they still breathing"? he says "no ma'am".
I remember reading somewhere that when a perpetrator is overly polite they normally do this to make themself come across as nice when in fact his reaction should be horrified at finding the bodies of his wife and Child.
Most ppl would be wanting to know if they are alive and he kept asking if they were dead!!! Like he had to make sure they were dead so they can’t tell it
Dear Esteemed Sir,
Please bear in mind that just because it's written in a book, that doesn't mean it's true. For example: The Bible, The 9/11 Report, any book written by Jordan Peterson, any book written by Mickey Mouse, etc.
Yours Sincerely,
etc etc
It's also just something we say in the south since birth. It may as well be as common as a period at the end of a sentence.
I'd be hysterical.
That’s just how he talks wasn’t being rude or polite
Look at Alec’s expression at 7:39 He shakes his head before the Pathalogist mentions how many shots she she sustains as if he knew. So horribly sad.
Well he works know since Urs been in the news, right? Also, because he shot her!
the best witness ever.
Who?
🐩🐩🐶 Listening to the dogs so stressed is very sad.They witnessed the murders, heard everything, then seeing the place with a lot of lights, strangers, barking and nobody calming them , the lying murderer talking about everything except what had happened , calling everyone to avoid being questioned👤👥
All he had to do was just admit what he did and choose to live or die. But to take down his family, it's such a selfish thing to do
Most ppl would want to know if someone harmed is still alive… Not Alex he had to know for sure they were dead 🙄
💯💯
I remember he said to the officer at the location right after the 911 call present he goes “ Are they officially dead” who in their right mind would say that
@@Eyerusalem_ Right so they are officially dead 😩 whyyyy don’t you see Brains ain’t you Shoot Maggie in the head lol
7:22:30 Alex's right-hand man whispers in his ear: "Camera's right on you now - time to cry" and Alex dutifully gives it his best performance.
Same thing went through my mind. I truly believe this guy is a master manipulator.
@@GrumpyMeow-Meow maybe not that masterful, since there's lots of commentators that aren't buying it. He was good at fraud, but not as good as the people behind 2008, because they all got away with it.
@@Silly.Old.Sisyphus agree. He managed to fool a lot of people for a very long time before the murders, though. Some people for 20+ years.
@@GrumpyMeow-Meow true, true - but a few people for 20+ years is chickenfeed in comparison to the truly masterful manipulators who've been fooling millions of people for 2023 - 313 = 1,700 years !!
did he eat Mexican food before this witness? - he just looks constipated and sweaty which clearly was his intention here for show. He clearly thinks everyone is stupid. We sir are not stupid. Your'e Fckd
The female prosecutor (skinny one w/ dark hair) is horrible, especially during the questioning of the DNA agent!! They should have had someone up there to at least be able to form questions so that the testimony made a little more sense, but she couldn’t even do that. At one point she said “so just take all of that and just put it together” and then just quickly moved on! Are you kidding me! It was like the perfect storm having Dumb and Dumber try to explain DNA testimony to the jury so that it made sense! 🤦🏾♀️
I call her ‘Wednesday.’ Obviously, a Junior associate. Zero ability to deliver anything with ooomph. She’s a big snooze.
His glasses need to be REMOVED!!!! Lol
Why is he even wearing them??
QUESTION: was the video date and time “adjusted”??
They don’t need murder weapons to convict. Having a body isn’t even necessary sometimes. Logic, people. A confluence of circumstantial like we’ve seen. Motive isn’t needed, but juries like them. Just cuz you wouldn’t kill over $ doesn’t mean he didn’t.
Alex is having a hard time seeing the pathologist showing diagrams and explaining the deaths because it's hard for him to see what
" HE DID TO HIS WIFE AND SON "...
Sadly that is true.
May he live with the images for the rest of his life of his wife and child’s last look at the ultimate betrayal from someone they loved and trusted to protect them.
I love the way those packages sound
Agent Nguyen sounds like she's reading vs. just speaking naturally...
What is Harpo doing? He’s annoying. Surely he has seen these photos before.
Why is he constantly making all those noises with his sinuses and nose and mouth? It’s so incredibly gross and it just seems like he’s trying REALLY HARD to make everyone believe he’s crying
It’s super annoying!
When he is nervous he does that
It’s Amazing to see the amount of people in these comments that want him to be found not guilty
I think it is because it is so difficult to believe he could do this to his son that a part of your thinking just won't allow you to believe he is guilty.
The state has NOT met their burden for their case & chief!!! O j 2.0
I know, it blows my mind. I don’t know how the defense team sleep at night.
I agree as of yet the state has not meet there burden but 100%
@@sharonbentley8612 They get paid either way.
What happened to Paul was disgusting! Whoever did this deserves no mercy!!! So evil!!!
Um, what happened to Maggie was also.
@@donmoore7785 I think they're referring to the fact that most of his brain landed down by his legs. But, make no mistake, what was done to Maggie was also horrible.
I think it's possible that he took the opportunity to shoot Paul while Maggie was at the other end of the kennels. Then, when Maggie heard the shotgun blast, she was heading to the front. Alex dropped the shotgun, picked up the rifle, and probably lay in wait and shot her.
It's just a theory, and by no means set in stone.
My question is..if the unidentified dna under Maggie's nails was so insignificant...WHY NOT test the remaining nails that weren't originally tested to see if there might be more dna for testing?? Why only test 2 or 3 nails?? Why not ALL 5 on each hand? Not like it's that many more and those nails could provide more pertinent information! There is some sloppy work going on in this case...never know what you'll hear next to make you shake your head..🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️
And she was cremated very quickly after
Am I crazy or did I not hear someone early on in this trail testify that they saw brown hair in Maggie's hand at the morgue at autopsy? I've never heard anything else about it and I'm very curious about this brown hair...🤔🤔
I'm anxiously waiting to hear more evidence about that.
@@T3361t Was I hearing things or did a lady from SLED say that??
Could’ve been dog hair.
@@nataliescruggs978 I remember that too
I missed it completely. That's interesting.
I've been watching these videos from the beginning... They need new microphones for the witness stand.
I stg if i ever hear the words unidentified and unrelated again, i might punch a wall 💀💀💀
Burnt face attorney questioning the DNA analyzer was really pissing me off. All that swaying back and forth bruh. Stand tf still 💀
Alex was 54, not 64. His bday was May 27, now he's 55.
Alex m’s face reflects that of a guilty man upset about the horrendous things he has done, there is no time for him to leave the murder scene and not hear the shots , he did it himself period
It's bad enough that they do'n't show photos but they could show us the ME's diagrams.....
the Jodi Arias trial this is not
I did see Buster with his head down he was sort of bent over when they were talking about his mother
This doctors is exemplary in her career imagine if she is your professor in medical school.
Dr. Ellen Riemer is also an attorney holding a JD
Wow!
I believe some of the jury said “it’s horrible” then the ME says “It’s horrible, I know”. 😢 then they take a break… wonder if that’s because it was too much (graphic) for the jury to see both victims at once.
Definitely that's why they took a break. To not overwhelm the Jury. Amazing Judge.
Interesting they are showing the displays?
He’s a good actor! He knows how to play the jury!
ACTOR is also known as the CRIMINAL in most cases.
Not even a good actor. A good actor can produce tears when needed.
Agent: the way we test for dna is to get grandma to run a marathon sitting on her couch holding two types of flower in a cup singing the same song, and the less we have to say, the longer we take to say it and the most important thing i have to tell you is that i put it in a paper bag with fifteen octillion unrelated unidentified individuals and then i write my initials on it and i will say this over and over again crackling the plastic until you run screaming out of the room pretending to have covid because you can't take it any more.
Counsel: What's an octillion? Is it like my stupid haircut?
Agent: Sigh,,, How the hell should i know?! i just follow the recipe, and besides - bigger sigh - i failed math at school, so gabbling on about swabbing a dirty old man's shorts is the only job i can get.
Audience: There's only 8 billion people on the whole planet, so who the f are these three hundred and twenty-eight gerglugillion plus or minus two unrelated uniformed unidentified uninformed individuals? are they autoerotic autonomous re-entry space alien android blue raincoat-wearing robots smelling like Elon Musk in the rutting season?
Judge: zzzzzzzz.... What?? Where am i? Isn't it time for tea, yet? These prezels are making me thirsty!
...... one cup of tea later ....
Cross-examiner #4: this is my big moment on telly, but i can't think of anything sensible to ask you, so let's fill up the time counting and adding up scissor cuts that have no evidential value whatsoever - isn't this fun?!
Agent: they are all unidentified unrelated uninteresting negative results
Cross-examiner #4: let me ask you endless pointless questions about things that have nothing to do with you or your analysis
Alex: Jesus wept, if i'd known i would have to sit through all this i would never have shot them!
Totally accurate account!😄😄😄
@@PattyMcqG you mean you didn't notice that i misspelled "flour"?! What kind of forensic detective are you??!!
😂😂👍
Wow!! You caught me off guard!! An unexpected funny.
I relate individually to this contributor octogajillion times
This witness is killing me! Maybe it’s me but I don’t understand what she’s talking about. Not everyone can understand. Doesn’t do well explaining
I might have missed something but who is Paula that is being discussed during the DNA evidence?
Oh, man! I just made a joking comment on the person near the bench coughing like they had COVID. I had no idea that someone actually did. It reminded me that I need to get the next booster. I hope that the other jurors aren't infected as well.
All the coughing going on was insane!!!
@@lyndaczika6327 Every trial has someone coughing, but this one is insane. Now we know why, at least in part, but there's someone near the clerk who has been coughing constantly. Someone in the comments said she was gone, but then came back, and she's been coughing ever since. Since she's near the judge, I'm assuming that she had to pass a covid test before coming back, but I don't know for sure. The judge seems to be concerned about it. I don't think I could watch this a second time.
@@zxy78267 there was a point in which it was almost constant!! So much at one point a witness couldn’t even hear one of the questions because someone was talking coughing!!!
@@lyndaczika6327 This isn't the first (high-profile) trial I've watch where someone in the audience has hacked away incessantly throughout the trial, distracting from the proceedings & drowning out the testimony in the process.
I'm not surprised some people feel entitled to be ignorant enough to come to court and cough throughout which is why the court should feel obligated to remove such ignoramuses from the courtroom.
The defense team leaves everything to be desired.
Maybe Maggie wore the gardeners gloves or used one of his tools or the gardener washed his hands and they both used the same towel.
You want to keep the pictures private!! WELL THEN MAYBE HE SHOULDN’T HAVE FARKING BLEW THEIR HEADS OFF WITH A DAMN SHOTGUN!!!! smdh. And AM upset? Yea, cause he got himself caught!
I'm so confused. These stains are from what shirt? The clean one he changed into after the murders??? Why so many stains?
it's a good question - the white shirt is clearly not the one he was wearing during his interview, nor is it the one Miss Shelly said he was wearing that morning, because that one was "sea-foam" colour. And if it had been covered in blood and guts and brains, he wouldn't have left it lying in the laundry basket, which is i guess where they found it.
So i reckon it's what they call in the trade: "a red herring" - just like the blue raincoat - a false trail for detectives to chase that goes nowhere.
@@Silly.Old.Sisyphus The white shirt is actually the one he had on when cops arrived on scene & in the patrol car interview (the same one they collected for evidence) The seafoam shirt was most certainly the one he was really wearing during the murders (since he was wearing it in the Snapchat video mere hours b4 he killed them). That's where he fukd up. But, yeah, that one conveniently disappeared. All this nonsense the defense is saying clears him, finding nothing on this white t-shirt is just that...BS! Obviously, the exact reason he changed b4 calling the cops. He knew they'd be collecting his clothes. Here's a thought though, if he did as he told the cops n checked/touched his wife n son, why no blood. I know, I know...b/c he didn't have to, he just took their last breath. Notice the cops body cam when they arrive, he begins right off the bat delivering the motive of someone else, then gives his aliby, then asks if they've checked on his wife n son. None of his story adds up!! He guilty AF!!
@@sandyquino2015 we haven't been told where the white shirt came from, but it is a reasonable guess that it was the one he was wearing when the cops came.
let's imagine you are the murderer, calling the cops... would you be so daft as to have them come with you soaked in gunpowder residue, victim's blood, and etc? Or would you nip back home, have a quick shower, and put on an old shirt you had worn the day before, so it wouldn't look like a freshly-laundered and ironed one? And then drive to your mother's house, and do silly things like with the raincoat and lying on your mother's bed to make sure Shelly remembers your antics so she doesn't pay attention to the the time, and then drive back and call the cops.
as far as i know, only his voice is on the snapchat video; if his image had been on it, you can be sure it would have been centre stage. so we can't know what he was wearing, but it could well have been the seafoam one with the collar that Shelly tucked in, so her dna would be on it too...
what does all this mean? it means the prosecution was off the rails to bring up the white shirt, and the blue raincoat, following red herring trails, perhaps just as Alex intended. On the other hand, maybe they had to go through the motions, because ev everyone had seen the white shirt and Shelly had talked about the tarp/raincoat.
It was significant that both sides used their most junior counsel for all witnesses today (including the cheerful Medical Examiner who behaved as if she were teaching a class of junior high school students), which means those witnesses are not important.
PS. i could lie on the ground, covered in blood, and you could come and roll me over, without getting any of my blood on your shirt. You can just roll me over with your foot, or just your hands. No problem. But it's more likely he didn't roll Paul over and only said he touched them to give a plausible reason for their dna being on him, in case it was.
@@Silly.Old.Sisyphus Im saying hes guilty. He changed shirts (from the seafoam striped shirt) after he murdered them, then changed into the clean white t-shirt then lastly he called the cops! Are we both talking about the white shirt he had on that was shown on the reponding officers body cam? The one examined for dna n blood? It was testified to the other day, that cops took him up to his house that evening and made him take off his shorts, shirt, shoes n collected them in paper bags the night of murders. I personally believe he changed clothes after he murdered n b4 calling cops. I suspect he probably burried/ hid that seafoam shirt someplace to burn later (the green one he's seen wearing in the snapchat video recorded that same day). I'm also saying his lies aren't fooling me (all 1000 of them) nor is his lies poor acting.
@@sandyquino2015 i'm convinced he's guilty too, but not because of his shirts.
i thought they didn't find any blood on his white shirt, but they did find Paul and Maggie dna - which is normal for a family. i didn't remember the seafoam one was striped, and i don't remember seeing a snapchat video with him wearing a green one - and i would have guessed seafoam = green anyway!
where's this snapchat video you're talking about? can you give me a url?
a pound and a half of food sounds like a crazy huge amt
Who was the constant cougher? Blame that person. Think of the money involved in a new trial - cuz that’s where this train is headed. Gawd.
There's someone near the bench. One of the commenters said that she was gone for a bit, but came back. Let's hope they made her take a covid test.
Absolutely none of that DNA analysis told me anything conclusive whatsoever. Imho she didn't explain it very clearly nor gave simpler breakdown when asked. Almost as if she didn't want to give outright names to X probabilities. She gives 3 scenarios "this more so than that" but when asked to say which scenario is highest probability, she didn't state which dna combination, she simply repeated the known + unknown contributor(s) as if it was all three comparison. Poor witness, poor attorney (seems she didn't grasp it herself either or she absolutely would have made it clear for the jury if it was supposed to be their "gotcha" moment imo.
if none of her testimony tells you anything conclusive then she did a good job! Because the dna evidence provided nothing conclusive to conclude, other than that it was more likely that at some time in the past Paul and/or Maggie had rubbed against Alex's shirt than that 2 strangers had done so, which tells you absolutely buggerall, so your inference is spot on, so her testimony was accurate. :)
It was horrible. MORE THAN LESS OF A NENOMILLECONDAIRE TO...
Basically, NOTHING HERE< NOTHING THERE. BUT..., a little bit here, and possibly but not limited to there. SMH
That's the way they're all trained to answer. If they give a personal opinion, like, "Alex Murdaugh's DNA was found here or there," it could cause a mistrial. They have to be so carefully neutral that in the end, it seems like they said nothing.
@@osiris_blanche I had no idea what was going on. Why couldn’t they just have given the results in “English”? This was like listening to someone speak another language…The female prosecutor was completely lost.
The female prosecutor is horrible!! They should have had someone up there to at least be able to form questions so that the testimony made a little more sense, but she couldn’t even do that. At one point she said “so just take all of that and just put it together” and then just quickly moved on! Are you kidding me! It was like the perfect storm having Dumb and Dumber try to explain DNA testimony to the jury so that it made sense! 🤦🏾♀️
Im fascinated with Dr. Riemer, super smart, yet down to earth professional lady. 'Poot treated her with condescending disrespect. She's so much smarter than the renowned Dick (Harpootlian). Shame on him.
I wonder why they can't have the juror who's sick watch it on a screen somewhere else. I guess that's just not policy but it makes more sense then bringing in a completely new person
If Maggie took the hose pipe down after CB wrapped it up, she certainly could show CB.
They concluded they have a Covid concern and talked about masks yet not everyone observing proceedings is wearing a mask?🙄
🤪👍
I thought they were talking about the jury wearing masks, not the entire courtroom.
They'll just say Alex has covid and it will be mistrialed and mothballed
@@GrumpyMeow-Meow both lawyers were concerned about the amount of people in court. They were passing out masks yesterday. I have a feeling they’ll cut the people down so they’re 6’ apart
I hope they disinfected everywhere the jury sits and breaks
The judge cant force someone to wear a mask. This is America, he can suggest it though. The "covid emergency " is over according to pedo joe.
Uh, hey court people, you DO know that there is an OFF button on the monitor right?? 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
No one seems to be very technically savvy. You can also minimize what ever is on the screen.
That gasp from the Jury was chilling. 7:21:28
I didn’t hear anything
@@hdettore I watched, but I don't know what they're talking about. I think I'll wait until the end of the day, and then come back and and check the time stamp.
Explain why a DNA expert who researched and included articles on hemotrace can’t explain a study which clearly shows amount of blood in relation to amount of LCV = reliability of test. Then explain why the prosecution seems incompetent on this issue. If they don’t get it how can a jury get it. Why are tax dollars paying these salaries?
This family is so hated its not impossible that Paul & Mag was murdered to frame Alex and knowing they have no money and best pple on their side, the justice system isn't always gonna get you justice. and one will likely see this family suffer immensely than just a slap on the wrist. SOOOO, it is NOT surprising to see comments here that don't believe Alex committed this.
Everyone's got their jabs so where's the problem with the big C? And if not, there's not a problem to begin with. So go on with the show.
Paul was looking at the shooter on the second shot. The shooter was outside the shed on the right side of the doorway, squatting up next to the shed. As soon as Paul looked the shooter pulled the trigger with the butt of the stock resting on the ground.
Whose the mean & angry looking guy with the thick beard/moustache that always sits behind AM? Is he the intimidator of the Prosecutions Witnesses?
I’ve been wondering too.
Where were the dogs during the murder? Someone answer me please if you can. Driving me nuts.
In the kennel.
Dogs were in the kennels watching everything
I hope the jury is following this DNA stuff. Damn.
That was mind boggling
The woman talked way too fast. Don’t understand why the Judge didn’t ask her to slow down. I had no clue what she was talking about most of the time.
Attorneys will summarize in closings.
My head was spinning a million miles an hour trying to keep up with everything 😳
Why is Dick walking around crowding her? I get he wants to see the screen but Take a Seat & Park It! Always trying to deflect & cause confusion. I loved the way Dr Reemer destroyed Dick. He can’t hold a candle to her. He looked like a fool trying to suggest either suicide or Contact Head Shot. Paul’s brain wouldn’t of flown out his skull & hit the ceiling before landing Intact on the floor by him if the shot was from the top down. No Way.
Anyone know who “Nolan” is?? That named was referenced when discussing the blood/DNA results?
My guess is it's possibly law enforcement, to exclude all officers that could have possibly left their dna during confiscation of weapons. But I can't remember specifically who it was. That name does sound familiar.
Alex is actually 54, not 64.
I don't see any tears from Alex Murdaugh
You have to remember he was a drug addict back then also...he's clean now after being in jail.
The defense has some nerve!
Everyone deserves a defense - that is our system. And, everyone is presumed innocent until found guilty.
@@donmoore7785 nothing to do with my statement. I absolutely agree. Carry on.
AM at 5:43: AM says to his atty Griffin: “I didn’t think that they had made so many of those?. 🤔
As people we can not predict how someone will act in grief... Please people we all can assume how we will act but when this kinda crime happens to you we as people really don't know how we will act. I've seen people treat death in many ways like falling out crying, passing out, joking , concerns for others, but one thing is inevitable is weight loss after the fact of a 20 year addiction. Weight loss is from grief not drugs. Come on let's get real with true life....
Guilt can also be a wonderful stress to cause you to lose weight just saying
1:23:51 I wonder how this witness would pronounce the word “tutor”.
What about the DNA under Maggie’s fingernail?
How’d that get there?
Who's the lady on oxygen perhaps in a scooter chair I see???
I was wondering the same thing
Instead of typing out court transcripts she is speaking them .
stenographer. I thought the same thing lol. I guess they no longer type
Oh wow!
@@brendadawnjones why don’t they just record it and type it later? Or at least give the lady something to tie it to the back of her head so she doesn’t have to hold it the whole time!
DEATH PENALTY & do it as soon as he is found GUILTY of the MURDER'S of his Wife & Son...
Jurors should all be wearing N95’s now - not medical or cloth. Nobody cares about anyone else. Those jurors and the judge are who matters.
Agree 💯
Masks don't help.
@@ghostgoat5508 not unless they’re N95 or maybe a KN95 and it’s worn over mouth AND nose and you don’t take it off for nothin.
The lawyers and court personnel should be too. Looks like they are all pretty close together.
I thought the shot was supposed to prevent COVID 🤡
Hope this delay isn’t due to Covid and declaring a mistrial.
We don’t need the majority of the media in there. Couple cameras are good enough. Require N95’s - over nose and mouth - no cloth or medical masks!
There's not. I think Law and Crime had filming pool on this trial
I bet Alex wishes he could catch him some COVID 😂
There would have been two shoots. So who was the other person?
Either that, or Alex had two guns. They talked about how there were always guns around those sheds.
This Agent Zapata is damn shady..
Welcome to April 2020.
few days to come up with his own theories and he was probably thinking it had to be two shooters bc two different guns were used - thus a reason he may have said "they" but talk about WEAK if the prosecution thinks this inaudible word of some kind is a gotcha moment - especially when they didn't get it at the time to ask follow-up question to make use of the moment for clarity and didn't arrest him at that moment - if they really hear him confess. sounds like they hired a crazy person that murdered them.
Alex says "they" ("did him so bad") in the police car BEFORE he knows two guns were used in the murders. I think this is a critical moment... he used 2 guns to make it appear there were two people.
@@PalosVerdesLife maybe he didn't know 2 guns yet but I think he may have heard that or thought of it anyway but still inconclusive bc I don't, and alot of people don't, hear "they" - so unless you are an eye witness to the murders and you saw him pull out two rifles like he is in the movie the Matrix all of the sudden .. you don't know what happened just based on this one tiny garbaled nonsense
They already told him two different guns were used.
Why are we not seeing the photos.. So dumb
The problem here is not branching outside your little box area of science. You don’t consider what the source of DNA is before presenting it in court? How did that tshirt get destroyed. Too many people in different depts doing different things and not actually looking beyond reading a result. Laziness. A DNA expert should understand what the objective is and be able to explain that in court. We tested this for touch, hair, blood deposited here and this was result it’s 99% or 50% accurate. The DNA expert should know the effects of other lab chemicals and test on there own work. Listening to SLED process. I would question every case involving DNA. In fact I would shut down that unit. It proved incompetent in every way in this case and so many others. Steven smith, several cases involving so called judges. There is no true oversight. Sick and sad.
Just read he plans to take the stand‼️‼️😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 he has lost it 😩
Please tell everyone where you read that.
They are loosing the case , him taking the stand would be the equivalent of a Hail Mary,
@@Foenem521 definitely not and they are not losing the case 😂😂😂 I hope he does take the stand lol I’m sure the sociopath crooked lawyer can explain how he lied when the video time stamped shows him there at the time of the murders 💁🏻♀️🥳
@@sunkiss3827 the defense is losing the case. They have nothing to lose buy having him testify.
@@Foenem521 get it right HE HAS NOTHING TO LOSE BUT TO FURTHER INCRIMINATE HIMSELF AS HE HAS ALREADY ADMITTED TO KILLING HIS SON AND TRYING TO RECREATE SOMETHING… LIKE A MURDER SCENE
Poot wants a mistrial? Again?
SLED = Amateur hour
Boy, covid just gotta rear its ugly head everywhere, doesn't it.....
Wear your mask unless talking 27:53 sit down
Haaaa, so do i!!!
Poot waffles !
Phoney Baloney crocodile tears 7:22:26. Alec Guilty!