Age 63, my hero is Jim Al-Khalili. I hope some TV channel employs him again soon. Every person needs to watch Jim. Legend. PS. Is there any option, other than to believe that 'space' (ie what our universe is expanding into) can be anything other than infinite?
Hi Jim, From listening to your talk, my conclusion would be that all particles regardless of their type, must be nodes connected to waves. That would explain their behavior.
I don't know who came up with the idea of almost drowning him out with that fucking music. It feels like trying to follow a very gifted speaker on physics on a building site.
@bluedot festival This is not Jim's talk about Life and Quantum Mechanics but a second talk he gave about Entanglement and Wormholes. Please update the title and the description, and, if possible, also upload his earlier talk about Quantum Biology.
Incredible... people..and experts are talking about Black Holes..there is so many videos about it..but strange...not even a single expert in those videos and presentations mentioned in person and name of Subrahmanian Chandrasekhar...who explained everything and gave All answers .. even precisely explained in his book- Mathematical theory of Black Holes.. For which he received Nobel Prize for 1984... And Time proved he was 100% right about All his findings about Black Holes.. Such credit must be given and recognized...as Time as ultimate Judge proved some other scientists even considered greatest...were wronge in many crucial"things". about Universe.
What are you talking about. Everyone knows what Chandrasekhar contributed as well as hat he theorized about black holes. He was recognized at the absolute highest level for his contributions.. ..and regardless of his claims of entitlement and disenchantment he expressed that his legend was not inflated in equal proportion to the volume he held of himself held in his own mind, the bottom line is he neither predicted phenomena of the black hole nor proved that black holes are in fact real occurrences... .. nor did he even come close to "explaining everything" or did he "give all the answers" about anything whatsoever. And thankfully the majority of the men who dedicate blood, sweat, and tears of their lifetimes to the forming of theories.. ..have courage enough to step out and speak them to the world.. knowing that none of them have all the answers and will be wrong about much, and whether right or wrong, will be mocked just for daring to speak up... Einstein endured worse yet theorized and published the entirety of what we are still trying to work out before Chandrasekhar was even born. Without Einstein, Chandrasekhar would not have even had the coat tails to hang on to and use to apply his mathematics. The concept alone was the gift of a career to him It takes wisdom of a small minded, three year old child, to complain, gripe, brag on himself, and want more than the lot he is given...then act a victim who's been slighted... when instead should be grateful just for participating.. Some men are comfortable and secure in their efforts, failures and all , along with what they've contributed.without needy of pointing themselves out .. .. enough so that they can humble themselves and simply give thanks when others take time out to acknowledge them as others see fit. Einstein never wanted awards or recognition. Great men contribute because they can, not for attention or to keep score.
@@mr-nr4td let me try to be simple:..on you tube.. you will find more than 50.. fifty videos about Black Holes..There is so many names talking And expressing views..and theories.. Could you believe...that Mr Chandrasekhar. Is not even mentioned..in any of these videos!!! See..I don't trust in coincidences.. Also you can comfortably add his first 20 years in London..Oxbridge scientific community..when Subrahmanian was even almost humiliated...for his theories and convictions.. All in all...many unpleasant memories.. In short..to be almost publicly forgotten..and before humiliated..I just felt..is not right measure Mr Subrahmanian Chandrasekhar work and legacy deserves.
instead of calling it a worm hole, why we just see it as a part or phenomenom of the struture of the space time, which is a vibrating wave where space and time are quantum wave of the same matter and the cancel each other and appear again so making the sence of space time
at time 8:08 he says that the photons entangled are of the same wave length and same energy. This is not real in all of them cause they all would neutralize and the system just would not make it.
THANX JIM for the info in the video I like the way you explane things. At time 6:50 he speakes of QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT and says that 2 entangle particles comunicate instantaneous braking through light speed. What I think of this is that whene light reaches 300000k/s everage light jumps 10 times faster than 300000k/s that is 3000000 and keeps on doing it : 30000000 and so on that almost instantaneously goes to the edge of our universe and comes. ENERGY is one way direction to the out then it comes to the in as fast we would not imagine.
@@Feyser1970 Do you have a better answer to the spooky action at a distanse, dont you think this could be why they see an atom in 2 places at the same time, see the atom as a marble in a band that goes one way then to the other so they see the atom in one side whene it stops then in the other side whene it stops to make it back again.
What if the distance between the entangled particles is just not real at quantum level and they are still sticked together just like two metal gears are, one spins and another spins exactly opposite. If there is any body to share some view on it. I mean to say may be the distances are just our illusion.
As much as I like to keep an open mind when speculating, I believe that this is very highly unlikely if you consider it through Ockham's razor. It would mean that all other matter or particles would have to revolve(in the sense of them merely existing) around all entangled particles and that would essentially cause a big mess, both metaphorically and literally. It would cause the concept of space to become meaningless or at least warped beyond all logic. I do however respect and applaud your idea as it really got me thinking how it might be possible.
BigCooter's Quantum Particle Observation Hypothesis: Entangled pairs of particles don't exist, like the Ether. What is now considered an entangled pair of particles, is ONLY ONE Particle, observed in 2 locations of Space-Time, and what we think of as non-entangled pairs of particles is actually two particles? Likewise, "Instantaneous communication" does NOT occur .. we are simply observing the same particle. Anyone want to co-develop experiments to evaluate the truth of this hypothesis?? ... Let's do it, and share the Nobel Prize of the Century !!!!
Entanglement is true check the video THE FLOWER OF LIFE OR DNA DECODED in you tube; its a picture of DNA PHOTOGRAPHY BY X RAY DEFRACTION that I decoded and shows entanglement cross section from north to south by pairs, it containes 4 hexagonals that each stand for an orbit and a color; when you add each pair entangled in each orbit all pairs are the same but when you add another orbit pairs the result changes but all of them are the same in the repective orbit.
If quantum effects in biology is true then that is where the answer to the true nature of reality lies .That is where the future scientific research should be focused on instead of endless speculations about wormholes ,quantum gravity and string theory. Stephen Hawking came to a similar conclusion after a lifetime of effort towards a complete unified theory of everything and expressed it in his article "Godel and the end of physics".
@Heisenberg-SchrodingerEmc2 Spacetron is the particle that is space time it self, with all its properties, time ,distance and geometry including gravity which arises when particle get mass size bigger than the planks distance,thats the breaking point between quantum field and relativity, so spacetron should be inclured into the fundamental particles so to complite the relation between the two fields
By the time 16:51 He explanes the worm holes. If the wormholes exist they should create a disc of matter and energy where this 2 mouths encounter each other and one half of the wormhole side should spin in one direction and the other half in oposite direction. Check the video in you tube THE FLOWER OF LIFE OR DNA DECODED to see how DNA ENTANGLES CROSS SECTION FROM NORTH TO SOUTH IN PAIRS. All the information came from a DNA picture found in you tube in DNA PHOTOGRAPHY BY X RAY DEFRACTION.
I am an evangelical. For myself... I feel that learning from lectures such as these has helped me find an answer to the biggest questions anyone of faith has. First and foremost what kind of energy could a soul be
This man deserves a Knighthood in appreciation of his ability to reach our understanding - Prof. Jim really is the greatest joy to listen to!
I read somewhere that he has an OBE?
I can't agree more
A complex and fascinating subject explained (as it always is by Jim) in a simple and elegant way - a joy to watch.
Age 63, my hero is Jim Al-Khalili. I hope some TV channel employs him again soon. Every person needs to watch Jim. Legend. PS. Is there any option, other than to believe that 'space' (ie what our universe is expanding into) can be anything other than infinite?
He needs to make more documentaries, i watched them all already multiple times 😅
❤️👌
I Love listening to Jim, he’s such a great Speaker!
I would honestly pay to have a dvd copy of any talk or documentary he’s ever done
Hi Jim,
From listening to your talk, my conclusion would be that all particles regardless of their type, must be nodes connected to waves. That would explain their behavior.
I love the way of teaching of professor Jim. He's going 2 be d new science's rock star ;-)
I don't know who came up with the idea of almost drowning him out with that fucking music. It feels like trying to follow a very gifted speaker on physics on a building site.
"To take the Mitt out of" - British slang:
To tease, mock, or ridicule (someone or something); to joke or kid
around (about someone or something).
The sound of the music is really distracting. I still really enjoyed this though,. Thanks.
Great talking. He makes such a complex issue seems simple ( for a non scientist ). Thank you for this vid.
Great shows Jim
Jim, Brian Cox, Lawrence Krauss, Brian GREEN,ETC. are great communicators for physics
❤️👌
Amazing man
Is it possible to use spoky action at the distance as a morse code? telecommunication time independent
@bluedot festival This is not Jim's talk about Life and Quantum Mechanics but a second talk he gave about Entanglement and Wormholes. Please update the title and the description, and, if possible, also upload his earlier talk about Quantum Biology.
Yes Jim, time and space are void at the causal hub. Worm holes could be the mechanism of connection of source and observation.
Yes both LQG and ST are wrong, UFT is much simpler than you could imagine and it's right in front of you and at the same "time" all around you .
Incredible... people..and experts are talking about Black Holes..there is so many videos about it..but strange...not even a single expert in those videos and presentations mentioned in person and name of Subrahmanian Chandrasekhar...who explained everything and gave All answers .. even precisely explained in his book-
Mathematical theory of Black Holes..
For which he received Nobel Prize for 1984...
And Time proved he was 100% right about All his findings about Black Holes..
Such credit must be given and recognized...as Time as ultimate Judge proved some other scientists even considered greatest...were wronge in many crucial"things". about Universe.
What are you talking about. Everyone knows what Chandrasekhar contributed as well as hat he theorized about black holes. He was recognized at the absolute highest level for his contributions.. ..and regardless of his claims of entitlement and disenchantment he expressed that his legend was not inflated in equal proportion to the volume he held of himself held in his own mind, the bottom line is he neither predicted phenomena of the black hole nor proved that black holes are in fact real occurrences... .. nor did he even come close to "explaining everything" or did he "give all the answers" about anything whatsoever.
And thankfully the majority of the men who dedicate blood, sweat, and tears of their lifetimes to the forming of theories.. ..have courage enough to step out and speak them to the world.. knowing that none of them have all the answers and will be wrong about much, and whether right or wrong, will be mocked just for daring to speak up...
Einstein endured worse yet theorized and published the entirety of what we are still trying to work out before Chandrasekhar was even born. Without Einstein, Chandrasekhar would not have even had the coat tails to hang on to and use to apply his mathematics. The concept alone was the gift of a career to him
It takes wisdom of a small minded, three year old child, to complain, gripe, brag on himself, and want more than the lot he is given...then act a victim who's been slighted... when instead should be grateful just for participating.. Some men are comfortable and secure in their efforts, failures and all , along with what they've contributed.without needy of pointing themselves out .. .. enough so that they can humble themselves and simply give thanks when others take time out to acknowledge them as others see fit. Einstein never wanted awards or recognition. Great men contribute because they can, not for attention or to keep score.
@@mr-nr4td let me try to be simple:..on you tube.. you will find more than 50.. fifty videos about Black Holes..There is so many names talking And expressing views..and theories.. Could you believe...that Mr Chandrasekhar. Is not even mentioned..in any of these videos!!!
See..I don't trust in coincidences.. Also you can comfortably add his first 20 years in London..Oxbridge scientific community..when
Subrahmanian was even almost humiliated...for his theories and convictions..
All in all...many unpleasant memories..
In short..to be almost publicly forgotten..and before humiliated..I just felt..is not right measure Mr Subrahmanian Chandrasekhar work and legacy deserves.
what is the back ground music for? To nerves Jim?
titinette331 it’s a festival, there other things happening
Would quantum entanglement survive the event horizon of a Black Hole? A perfect way to communicate with places outside our universe of experience.
Excellent and exciting documentary.
Why are all of his video's spoilt by unnecessary music?
Why are comments "SPOILT" by idiots like you who cannot or will not use proper spelling?
What level of infinity does 1/0 produce?
He's why I want to go back to college
Jolly good show old chap.
Nice program
instead of calling it a worm hole, why we just see it as a part or phenomenom of the struture of the space time, which is a vibrating wave where space and time are quantum wave of the same matter and the cancel each other and appear again so making the sence of space time
Worm Hole makes descriptive sense Xavier, differentiation. Your choice of 'see "IT" gets lost in the "IT's" whatever IT IS IT IS not IT.
at time 8:08 he says that the photons entangled are of the same wave length and same energy. This is not real in all of them cause they all would neutralize and the system just would not make it.
you can explain this in detail when you give your own talk, if anyone bothers to listen to you
Congrats.
This isn't the talk in the title
Eh, it's 2019. Fact's don't matter anymore.
I remember him as a quiet relaxed speaker
but this was a bit like watching an unhinged Beto O'Rourk
very distracting.
I think he was having to talk loud as it was held at a festival or something.. you can hear the music outside
What's with all the arm waving by Jim Khalili?
I did not even notice it. I was ACTUALLY LISTENING.
He's actually part quantum robin.
It's simply "gesticulation."
THANX JIM for the info in the video I like the way you explane things.
At time 6:50 he speakes of QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT and says that 2 entangle particles comunicate instantaneous braking through light speed. What I think of this is that whene light reaches 300000k/s everage light jumps 10 times faster than 300000k/s that is 3000000 and keeps on doing it : 30000000 and so on that almost instantaneously goes to the edge of our universe and comes. ENERGY is one way direction to the out then it comes to the in as fast we would not imagine.
in fact you don t know
@@Feyser1970 Do you have a better answer to the spooky action at a distanse, dont you think this could be why they see an atom in 2 places at the same time, see the atom as a marble in a band that goes one way then to the other so they see the atom in one side whene it stops then in the other side whene it stops to make it back again.
What if the distance between the entangled particles is just not real at quantum level and they are still sticked together just like two metal gears are, one spins and another spins exactly opposite. If there is any body to share some view on it. I mean to say may be the distances are just our illusion.
As much as I like to keep an open mind when speculating, I believe that this is very highly unlikely if you consider it through Ockham's razor. It would mean that all other matter or particles would have to revolve(in the sense of them merely existing) around all entangled particles and that would essentially cause a big mess, both metaphorically and literally. It would cause the concept of space to become meaningless or at least warped beyond all logic. I do however respect and applaud your idea as it really got me thinking how it might be possible.
@Sand Stone Lighten up Francis.
BigCooter's Quantum Particle Observation Hypothesis: Entangled pairs of particles don't exist, like the Ether. What is now considered an entangled pair of particles, is ONLY ONE Particle, observed in 2 locations of Space-Time, and what we think of as non-entangled pairs of particles is actually two particles? Likewise, "Instantaneous communication" does NOT occur .. we are simply observing the same particle. Anyone want to co-develop experiments to evaluate the truth of this hypothesis?? ... Let's do it, and share the Nobel Prize of the Century !!!!
Entanglement is true check the video THE FLOWER OF LIFE OR DNA DECODED in you tube; its a picture of DNA PHOTOGRAPHY BY X RAY DEFRACTION that I decoded and shows entanglement cross section from north to south by pairs, it containes 4 hexagonals that each stand for an orbit and a color; when you add each pair entangled in each orbit all pairs are the same but when you add another orbit pairs the result changes but all of them are the same in the repective orbit.
If quantum effects in biology is true then that is where the answer to the true nature of reality lies .That is where the future scientific research should be focused on instead of endless speculations about wormholes ,quantum gravity and string theory. Stephen Hawking came to a similar conclusion after a lifetime of effort towards a complete unified theory of everything and expressed it in his article "Godel and the end of physics".
Stuart Hameroff and Roger Penrose -
the entanglement phenomena is becouse when you separate the particals the still be into the same space time no matter how far you separete them
@Heisenberg-SchrodingerEmc2 Spacetron is the particle that is space time it self, with all its properties, time ,distance and geometry including gravity which arises when particle get mass size bigger than the planks distance,thats the breaking point between quantum field and relativity, so spacetron should be inclured into the fundamental particles so to complite the relation between the two fields
@@xavieraguerrevere9716
Prove it because. You forgot to do so.
Jim is super hybrid person #
send entangled satellites and probes out to our systems neighbours
By the time 16:51 He explanes the worm holes. If the wormholes exist they should create a disc of matter and energy where this 2 mouths encounter each other and one half of the wormhole side should spin in one direction and the other half in oposite direction.
Check the video in you tube THE FLOWER OF LIFE OR DNA DECODED to see how DNA ENTANGLES CROSS SECTION FROM NORTH TO SOUTH IN PAIRS. All the information came from a DNA picture found in you tube in DNA PHOTOGRAPHY BY X RAY DEFRACTION.
Be prepared. Evangelicals will attack at any moment. ( but not as much as when Dawkins was here )
Dawkins is a philosophical moron and is not a quantum physicist
I am an evangelical. For myself... I feel that learning from lectures such as these has helped me find an answer to the biggest questions anyone of faith has. First and foremost what kind of energy could a soul be
@@david-joeklotz9558 Dawkins is not a philosopher and doesn't claim to be. He is a top level ethologist and evolutionary biologist .
Space Ghost He is a scientist. But scientific work incorporates world view and, Dawkins has directly involved himself publicly that way
Hall Ruth Lee Brian Jackson Betty
But Sonic the hedgehog can go faster than the speed of light....
ok he's off by a factor of 10 million but the flash can. Check. Mate.
Noisy audience.
The adorable library unequivocally brake because united kingdom computationally kiss from a dry brick. ancient, horrible talk