The Hidenburg Disaster Explained

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 84

  • @admiralbenbow5083
    @admiralbenbow5083 Рік тому +5

    140,000 m3 of highly inflammable gas floating around in the sky.
    What could possibly go wrong ??

  • @user-gq2vn1xj2r
    @user-gq2vn1xj2r 2 роки тому +8

    There is a recent NOVA doc on this that I found far more interesting.

    • @GavinsMarineMom
      @GavinsMarineMom 2 роки тому

      Refresh my memory, didn't that documentary conclude that most likely cause of the explosion had to do with the paint? It's been a "minute" since I watched it 😊

    • @user-gq2vn1xj2r
      @user-gq2vn1xj2r 2 роки тому +2

      @@GavinsMarineMom Anchor lines caused grounding, which allowed static electricity to arc across fabric to airframe, igniting a hydrogen leak. Ironically, the dope-covered fabric was separated from the airframe on purpose by a small gap, which actually caused the arcing.

  • @lebac
    @lebac Рік тому +1

    This video could have been 15 minutes long without constant repetition and fillers to supplement commercials.

  • @jgrab1
    @jgrab1 Рік тому +3

    "The fact that Lau survived is remarkable because he was inside the airship when the disaster began." They were ALL inside the airship when the disaster began.

    • @philsurtees
      @philsurtees Рік тому

      _"They were ALL inside the airship when the disaster began."_
      Um ... no ... they weren't.

    • @kc4cvh
      @kc4cvh Рік тому

      @@philsurtees That's true. One man on the ground was killed.

    • @philsurtees
      @philsurtees Рік тому +3

      @@kc4cvh *_SIGH_*
      He's referring to the fact that some of the people, like Lau, were up inside the airship, while others - such as the passengers, and some of the crew - were in the gondolas attached to the bottom of airship. It's remarkable that Lau survived because he was not in one of the gondolas, he was inside the airship when the disaster began.
      *SPLEESH!*

  • @ckwind1971
    @ckwind1971 2 роки тому +4

    I always think of the Challenger exploding

    • @selfwilliam8708
      @selfwilliam8708 2 роки тому

      Fake news....everyone that was in the challenger is alive today except for one...they even use the same names....space is fake....Flat Earth and The Bible proove very easily that we live under a firmament....abd that earth is the stationery level center of thr universe

    • @XeiDaMoKaFE
      @XeiDaMoKaFE 2 роки тому

      they are alive , it was just another lie , like the hindenberg

  • @lociflow6154
    @lociflow6154 Рік тому +4

    Imagine having a smoking room in a flying hydrgen bomb

    • @767driver4
      @767driver4 2 місяці тому

      That room was pressurized to keep any traces of hydrogen from getting in that room. But you’re right, not the wisest thing to have on board.

  • @darryl3422
    @darryl3422 Рік тому +2

    Whether static or st elmos fire the storm and wet mooring ropes started it

  • @adamsteele6148
    @adamsteele6148 2 роки тому +19

    The cause is well known. Static electricity caused an arch and ignited the hydrogen. DISMISSED.

    • @skar5541
      @skar5541 2 роки тому

      If we could all be like you the world would be a cuntier place. Your DISMISSED

    • @Woodman-Spare-that-tree
      @Woodman-Spare-that-tree 2 роки тому +2

      arc

    • @c.s.7266
      @c.s.7266 2 роки тому

      Lol! yep

    • @wesleynorris2313
      @wesleynorris2313 2 роки тому +1

      Id rather hear the story despite knowing what actually happend

    • @LordsUther
      @LordsUther 2 роки тому +5

      I guess we know why youre not invited to parties

  • @kc4cvh
    @kc4cvh Рік тому +2

    Ultimately the cause of the Hindenburg fire is moot, as the end of the rigid airship was brought by the enormous surface area of the hull, which kept airspeed low and made the craft uncontrollable if perpendicular (especially vertical) air currents were encountered. You'll note that all three helium-inflated rigid airships met a quick death from this cause, generally faring worse than their hydrogen-filled counterparts.

  • @wenthulk8439
    @wenthulk8439 4 місяці тому

    Secrets of the Dead claims that Hindenburg was riddled with problems right from the start

  • @mexicanboxingkartel8283
    @mexicanboxingkartel8283 2 місяці тому

    We don't need those dumpsters flying around

  • @EkcotheBeholder
    @EkcotheBeholder Рік тому +1

    With the spark? If a downpour was happening, would the gas mix with the rain droplets "coating" the outside of the ship? How much more would the air pressure be due to the storm? You did your experiment on a nice clear day, your test worked inside a shop, and the air pressure would be more, i think, just a question.

  • @ronaldschultenover8137
    @ronaldschultenover8137 4 місяці тому

    It was already obsolete FW200 direct to NYC

  • @justin_de_leon
    @justin_de_leon 2 роки тому +7

    Curious if it’s really the most iconic air crash. When I thought of air crash, it’s the Tenerife disaster in 1977, when two Boeing 747s collided in a fateful accident. I’m just thinking out loud hehe :) Aviation/Air travel industry pls don’t harm me.

    • @roseprevost8081
      @roseprevost8081 2 роки тому +2

      That wasn't an accident, the pilot was impatient and none of the crew could overrule his decision to leave.

    • @LathropLdST
      @LathropLdST 2 роки тому +1

      It was a collection of bad luck and worse decisions.
      And I have studied that crash... Now I know that Van Santen had an actual sane reason to wanting to leave. Not defending him, but for a long time, I thought it was him being merely pig-headed.

    • @malcolm9650
      @malcolm9650 2 роки тому +1

      Iconic airship crash that ended airship travel

    • @SevenCostanza
      @SevenCostanza 2 роки тому +3

      Literally everyone on earth has heard of the Hindenburg. Literally like 3 percent of people have heard of Tenerife so yeah nah

    • @PronatorTendon
      @PronatorTendon 2 роки тому +1

      I as well like to apply my personal anecdotal experiences to all of humanity over the course of over right decades

  • @BigboyMaki-em7wu
    @BigboyMaki-em7wu 3 місяці тому

    There was 97 passengers in board

  • @BigboyMaki-em7wu
    @BigboyMaki-em7wu 3 місяці тому

    Actually there was 59 passengers left

  • @mexicanboxingkartel8283
    @mexicanboxingkartel8283 2 місяці тому

    Theory? Dude it was flammable gaaaassssssss

  • @BigboyMaki-em7wu
    @BigboyMaki-em7wu 3 місяці тому

    Only 61 passengers was remaining

  • @gc7820
    @gc7820 8 місяців тому

    With the bomb the outer skin rippled just before the fire broke out like what eye whitnesses said

  • @suzyqualcast6269
    @suzyqualcast6269 2 роки тому +7

    Revisionist bollx.
    'the Nazi party was highly unpopular'...
    Not back then it wasn't.

    • @GavinsMarineMom
      @GavinsMarineMom 2 роки тому

      Right....in early 20th century Europe, Fascism and Communism were thought to be the only 2 philosophies that would extinguish all the world's ills.

    • @Dorpmuller
      @Dorpmuller Рік тому

      @@thefreestylefrEaK Sure they did. Hitler got ~90% of the vote, legally, because of the disastrous Weimar Republic economy that starved Germany. Similar to what I see coming here if we don't get rid of biden.

  • @sushimamba4281
    @sushimamba4281 Рік тому

    I think the cause was someone on the ship experimenting with setting farts on fire.

  • @BigboyMaki-em7wu
    @BigboyMaki-em7wu 3 місяці тому

    It was across going across on the atlantic ocean

  • @triple6wolfi
    @triple6wolfi 2 роки тому +5

    Poor bastards, wish they still had airships though

    • @FadeintotheShadows
      @FadeintotheShadows 2 роки тому +3

      Same here. What a slow but still very cool way to travel across the Atlantic Ocean.

    • @timothybelgard-wiley4823
      @timothybelgard-wiley4823 2 роки тому +1

      ...I don't know, we lost 3, all of them using helium, not hydrogen, it would be cool, but I don't see anything bigger than the blimps we see today...there good at hovering , great for viewing, not in the brief moment we see something in jet airliner....

    • @richardprice5978
      @richardprice5978 2 роки тому

      @@FadeintotheShadows with modern jet-fans 200-500 is slow to you in a airship? yes i know that SST's can go mack-2

    • @richardprice5978
      @richardprice5978 2 роки тому +1

      yes i like the idea of airships and if it was fairly priced id pick that over a 777 as long flight's make me sick short ones im ok with same with ship's/car rides

  • @aimranomar8724
    @aimranomar8724 Рік тому

    I think the death treat is coming from someone who built it and know about its potential catastrophe but still have to built it due to the death treat of himself from the political force...

  • @lindaeasley5606
    @lindaeasley5606 2 роки тому

    Went up in flames like a matchstick model wrapped in tissue

  • @BigboyMaki-em7wu
    @BigboyMaki-em7wu 3 місяці тому

    Because two fell out of the hindenburg

  • @mexicanboxingkartel8283
    @mexicanboxingkartel8283 2 місяці тому

    Why in the hell didn't they use helium 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @XeiDaMoKaFE
    @XeiDaMoKaFE 2 роки тому +1

    manipulation , it's not random that naza controls all the helium and hydrogen in the world

  • @edwardtownsendjr.
    @edwardtownsendjr. Рік тому

    God blew it up! THE END💯👈🏿

  • @Civsuccess2
    @Civsuccess2 Рік тому

    Bomb looks most like the real one.

  • @rm783
    @rm783 2 роки тому +1

    His

  • @CGHittaz_isxxc
    @CGHittaz_isxxc 2 роки тому

    I still think a terrorist explosion could have been the most likely cause, considering the last theory could have accured on the last flights of the hindunburg, but didnt, so a sudden explosion would have been most likely caused by a charge by someone who hated germany.

    • @amosonyoutube
      @amosonyoutube Рік тому

      if it were a bomb it could of happen in a similar way. Also yeah like germany def have enemies considering theres a swastika on it. But the way they said it makes alot of sense so i think its most likely happen the way they said.

  • @justinbarion2269
    @justinbarion2269 2 роки тому +3

    German efficiency, ......at incompetence. 😆

  • @mexicanboxingkartel8283
    @mexicanboxingkartel8283 2 місяці тому

    Who invented this stupid thing?

  • @JamesWylde
    @JamesWylde 2 роки тому +2

    I was afraid you would have a mid roll in about the first 7 mins. Thanks for letting me know to report and block you. If you want the extra 3 or 4 cents for having random ads in your videos, at least watch Distant Signals. He's the only UA-camr I've seen that is a professional and knows how to segue in to ads.

    • @CoAndCoLaptopAccount
      @CoAndCoLaptopAccount 2 роки тому +6

      or ya know... enjoy your free entertainment. Its not like you paid for this. or you can act like a child and expect high quality content for free.
      Pay for youtube premium or watch ads. but don't be a leech.

  • @deerobinson9524
    @deerobinson9524 Рік тому

    Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

  • @anaconda470
    @anaconda470 Рік тому

    Hindenberg 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @shawnthefriendlymonster9480
    @shawnthefriendlymonster9480 2 роки тому +2

    "The Nazis were highly unpopular to say the least."
    Ya don't say.

    • @richardprice5978
      @richardprice5978 2 роки тому

      so much that the mob 5 families tried taking them out of power in the usa 🇺🇸 and Germany 🇩🇪

    • @matthiasb.p.8834
      @matthiasb.p.8834 2 роки тому

      U have to remember that it was the 1930s,Italy,Germany, Austria even before the Anschluss and Spain all were fascist. France had a big far right movement. Russia also wasn't democratic. In fact, there were only 2 big functioning democracies, USA and UK, the US was isolationist so yeah.

  • @666bingo
    @666bingo Рік тому

    the americans were responsible

  • @sunsaverfromnhh9184
    @sunsaverfromnhh9184 2 роки тому

    Timed? Remote control? No. The bomb was triggered by a float in the ballast tank= low level in the water tank means the ship is having trouble with stability. The IED was set to explode by a saboteur with access to the inside workings of the craft's flight controls and particularly the area where the ignition originated from. Or maybe some idiot working inside the engine room lit a cigarette- 'we're close enough to landing now, it's safe for me to go ahead and have a smoke...'- last thoughts of a dead guy... obviously new to his job.

    • @sunsaverfromnhh9184
      @sunsaverfromnhh9184 2 роки тому

      P.S. Could have been struck by lightning from quite a considerable distance away- hence a blue flash was seen prior to the main blast.