‘कौन हैं भारत माता?’ Javed Akhtar और Purushottam Agarwal की बतकही

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,6 тис.

  • @Tanay334
    @Tanay334 3 роки тому +115

    What a thoughtful session. Mr. Puroshuttam Aggarwal and Mr. Javed Akhtar discussed everything from positives to negatives about the time.

  • @saratkumarkar-amillionmemo395
    @saratkumarkar-amillionmemo395 3 роки тому +33

    Purushottam sir has written an outstanding book....I have the English version. I was a student of JNU and a resident of Sutlej hostel. Sir was our hostel warden and came out as a loving human being, yet a disciplinarian! An outstanding academic and thinker of this country...we have so much to learn. Thank you sir, for this book and evwrything else. And what to say Javed Sahab!! A true Bharat Ratna🙏

  • @pranavthakur329
    @pranavthakur329 3 роки тому +115

    What a beautiful and intelligent conversation. I wonder when we'll have such a logical and rational discussion again on our TV sets. Heere ho aap log, mera salaam!

    • @gowe6944
      @gowe6944 3 роки тому

      Opinion matters when you have to distinguish between things.
      Yes you should see when they take side of their people cleverly and we all left over alone.

    • @gowe6944
      @gowe6944 3 роки тому +1

      Achhi achhi baate sabhi kar lete hai agar ham unse influence ho jaate hai toh hamaare andar kami hai. Ham toh apne logo ke liye hi sochna chahiye chahe biased hi kyu na hona pade.

    • @udayadityaborthakur9299
      @udayadityaborthakur9299 3 роки тому +4

      @@gowe6944 yaha pe apne logo ki hi baat ho rahi thi.

    • @pranavthakur329
      @pranavthakur329 3 роки тому +8

      @@gowe6944 Buddy you're either really confused or you have not watched the whole thing and then just came straight down to the comment section. They are talking about India and Nehru. There is no us and them in this conversation. There are no sides. I know what you mean by "apne log" but for me apne log means all Indians irrespective of their faith, rahi baat inki, both of them are true patriots, something that small minded people will never be. I'm sorry but I smell bigotry. Agr biased hona bhi hai then be biased towards the oppressed and the truth.

    • @gowe6944
      @gowe6944 3 роки тому

      Mai is video ke liye comments nahi kiya general comments kiya hu.
      Ye log bas achhi achhi baate kar lete hai kahi par bhi lekin time par apne log ka hi side lete hai.
      Bas chutiya banaate hai khub achhi achhi baate karke.
      Isliye jo aadmi jo baate bolta or kahta hai uspar nahi jao jo karta hai uski analysis karo 👍👍

  • @navneettanenia4905
    @navneettanenia4905 3 роки тому +397

    ये वार्ता उन व्हाट्सएप यूनिवर्सिटी के इतिहास के छात्रों को समर्पित है जिनका इतिहास बोध व्हाट्सएप के आने के बाद शुरू हुआ,धन्यवाद न्यूज़लॉन्ड्री ऐसे शानदार कार्यक्रम के लिए

    • @niteshgangwar5164
      @niteshgangwar5164 3 роки тому +9

      Arey sir wo sb pagla gye h abhi unko farq ni pdega

    • @Pakista132
      @Pakista132 3 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/wvoGBuo56Ys/v-deo.html

    • @shivbhadoriya48
      @shivbhadoriya48 3 роки тому +6

      और आपका you tube बाली University, sir थोड़ा दिमाग खोलो अपना नही तो अल्लाह हु अकबर चिलाओगे किसी दिन ।

    • @navneettanenia4905
      @navneettanenia4905 3 роки тому +8

      @@shivbhadoriya48 थोड़ा दिमाग रखिए, खुद का,व्हाट्सएप से इतिहास मत उठाइये,आपके विचार सही है,हर किसी को सही लगता है खुद का दृष्टिकोण लेकिन आपकी सोच सही ही हो जरूरी तो नही,व्हाट्सएप तो आज आया है इसके पहले भी ऐसा बहुत साहित्य आता था

    • @shivbhadoriya48
      @shivbhadoriya48 3 роки тому +4

      @@navneettanenia4905 दोस्त समस्या बहुत जटिल जितना आसान आपको लग रहा है उतना है नही इसलिए समझो इस वामपंथ, और इस्लाम के घटजोड को । एक बार the jaipur dialogue channel को भी देखो।

  • @jaysinghrathore6577
    @jaysinghrathore6577 3 роки тому +28

    बहुत बेहतरीन संवाद था, निश्चित रूप से अतीत के अनुभवों से सीख कर हम आगे का रास्ता सुगम बना सकते हैं।
    किंतु हम ईमानदार हों तभी ऐसा हो सकता है,

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      No one thinks that India shoul be disintegrated and merged into Pakistan, China, Bangladesh and Shrilanka. If someone thinks so, this piece of writing is not for him.
      As we believe, India should exist and prosper as a nation, we need to find why are we a nation?
      Some historian will say that we were never a nation. It is a creation of British. Although it may be partly true, it is not the full truth. If British were so good in building large nations, they would have kept a big one for themselves as well. Today, they are limited to a tiny island. Therefore, this argument is defeated. Some will say; Mahatma Gandhi, the father of the nation created India when the people of the land got united under his leadership to fight against British rule and over threw them. This argument is also not true as the people of Dhaka, New Delhi and Lahore faught togather against British though we are three different nations. Someone like Purushottam Ji says that the nationhood of India is unique in the world. It is unity in diversity. Why should we believe it? If it didn't work before 1947, why are we so confident that it will work in future?
      India is an ancient cultural nation, extending from Himalaya to Kanyakumari and Hindukush to Myamar. (Even Mr Agarwal and his god Nehru Ji believed though a bit late) The geographical territory of our nation has shrunk as we haven't nourished it properly. In fact, people don't know where is the root. Therefore, we don't irrigate and nourish it. Some of us are taught that it is unity in diversity, so we spray nutrients on the branches. More precisely on weaker branches.
      Without being politically correct and in the larger interest of the nation with its citizens, I reiterate with full conviction; the root and stem of our nation is its hinduness. All the branches of of diversity would flourish on it and will give vivid colours of greatness if the root is healthy and the stem is strong.
      Hinduness of every citizen needs to be identified and nurtured. Everryone in the country has his or her hindu connection either by birth or through ancestry. A minor segment which believe that they migrated from somewhere else and were never hindu in any sense could be persuaded to accept the hinduness by association. A large number of indians living abroad aquire and assimilate the assence of the nationhood of the land truly and effortlessly. Therefore, it is not difficult to do the same here. However, before requesting the migrants to establish association with hinduness, the indegenous population should disply it in full frame. Arousing their hinduness and reassuring their non-political religious aspirations can be achieved easily if we make an honest attempt.
      A healthy hinduness which is honest, hard working, compassionate and accomodating; can bring the old glory to our beloved Bharat Mata.
      Any attack of our hinduness is an attack on 'Bharat Mata'.

    • @Cghj_
      @Cghj_ 3 роки тому

      Sir imandar to only muslims hota h iska mtlb ye hua ki rasta sugam nhi hoga ..

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      @@Cghj_ ye kya kah rahi hain bahan ji. India mein jitna crime ho raha hai usme aadha to wahi log kar rahe hain. Abadi to abhi 5 mein ek hi hai.

  • @animlwild
    @animlwild 3 роки тому +132

    Now this is called a debate, no matter whether we agree with what both gentlemen have opined on the matter...

    • @shivbhadoriya48
      @shivbhadoriya48 3 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/Vly2QuL1UBA/v-deo.html

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому +3

      Javed Ji is as rational as he always is. However, this Mr Agarwal thinks, the people of India are fools. He tries to prove with silly evidences that the direction of Mr Nehru was right. He even quotes Mr Obama that mixed economy was the best option. If Obama really thought so, he would have done something in this direction. Did he? It is the established historical fact that policies of Nehru led to division of India, dispute over Kashmir, losing war against China and leaving India as a rich country with poor people. A China with all the military might and 7 times bigger economy than India, can't dare to dictate terms to India. This is the policy in right direction............Bharat Mata ki Jai.

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      @Anju Patel I don't know. Will it for you to decide. 🙏

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      @Dev raj Dev China 14.34, India 2.86 to be more precise. China population 1.4 billion, India population 1.3 billion.

    • @Pork393
      @Pork393 3 роки тому

      How can it be debate when both are of the same view? Javed Akhtar said in his opening sentence. Where is the contra रिण view?

  • @santoshbarath945
    @santoshbarath945 3 роки тому +46

    न्यूज़ लॉन्ड्री का बहुत बहुत शुक्रिया 🙏🙏 बहुत ही शानदार प्रोग्राम था 🙏🙏

  • @aishwaryayadav490
    @aishwaryayadav490 3 роки тому +26

    धन्य हो गया ईन दो महानुभावों की वार्तालाप सुनकर 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

  • @samriddhipriya9815
    @samriddhipriya9815 3 роки тому +51

    Javed sir is such a good person . Thank you newslaundry for this .

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      No one thinks that India shoul be disintegrated and merged into Pakistan, China, Bangladesh and Shrilanka. If someone thinks so, this piece of writing is not for him.
      As we believe, India should exist and prosper as a nation, we need to find why are we a nation?
      Some historian will say that we were never a nation. It is a creation of British. Although it may be partly true, it is not the full truth. If British were so good in building large nations, they would have kept a big one for themselves as well. Today, they are limited to a tiny island. Therefore, this argument is defeated. Some will say; Mahatma Gandhi, the father of the nation created India when the people of the land got united under his leadership to fight against British rule and over threw them. This argument is also not true as the people of Dhaka, New Delhi and Lahore faught togather against British though we are three different nations. Someone like Purushottam Ji says that the nationhood of India is unique in the world. It is unity in diversity. Why should we believe it? If it didn't work before 1947, why are we so confident that it will work in future?
      India is an ancient cultural nation, extending from Himalaya to Kanyakumari and Hindukush to Myamar. (Even Mr Agarwal and his god Nehru Ji believed though a bit late) The geographical territory of our nation has shrunk as we haven't nourished it properly. In fact, people don't know where is the root. Therefore, we don't irrigate and nourish it. Some of us are taught that it is unity in diversity, so we spray nutrients on the branches. More precisely on weaker branches.
      Without being politically correct and in the larger interest of the nation with its citizens, I reiterate with full conviction; the root and stem of our nation is its hinduness. All the branches of of diversity would flourish on it and will give vivid colours of greatness if the root is healthy and the stem is strong.
      Hinduness of every citizen needs to be identified and nurtured. Everryone in the country has his or her hindu connection either by birth or through ancestry. A minor segment which believe that they migrated from somewhere else and were never hindu in any sense could be persuaded to accept the hinduness by association. A large number of indians living abroad aquire and assimilate the assence of the nationhood of the land truly and effortlessly. Therefore, it is not difficult to do the same here. However, before requesting the migrants to establish association with hinduness, the indegenous population should disply it in full frame. Arousing their hinduness and reassuring their non-political religious aspirations can be achieved easily if we make an honest attempt.
      A healthy hinduness which is honest, hard working, compassionate and accomodating; can bring the old glory to our beloved Bharat Mata.
      Any attack of our hinduness is an attack on 'Bharat Mata'.

  • @VijayParekhMumbai-India
    @VijayParekhMumbai-India 3 роки тому +29

    What a wonderful summary!
    CRITICISM is one thing,
    DISMISSAL is another, but,
    DISTORTION is altogether different

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому +3

      Criticism of Nehru was so intense that it lis equivalent to dismissal. His intent and policies were solely responsible for division of India, creation of Kashmir dispute, 1962 war debacle and India beling 7 times poorer than China despite having abundant natural resources. We were unfortunate to have the leader like him at the critical juncture of our history.

  • @prateekverma366
    @prateekverma366 3 роки тому +210

    इन जैसे लोगों को राज्यसभा में होना चाहिए, रोने धोने वाले नमूनों को नहीं

    • @drjpbaghel6922
      @drjpbaghel6922 3 роки тому +3

      जावेद अख्तर तो राज्य सभा में रह चुके हैं ।
      पत्नी शबाना आजमी अभी राज्य सभा में हैं ।

    • @rjshahnawaz6483
      @rjshahnawaz6483 3 роки тому +2

      Prateek Merebhai Sachchi Sahi Kaha. Ppar Inko Rajyasabha Bhejega Kaun?

    • @shivbhadoriya48
      @shivbhadoriya48 3 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/Vly2QuL1UBA/v-deo.html

    • @Raviwaar
      @Raviwaar 3 роки тому +2

      अरे लंगूर ऐसे बंदर ही राज्य सभा की शोभा बढ़ाते थे

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      Javed Ji is as rational as he always is. However, this Mr Agarwal thinks, the people of India are fools. He tries to prove with silly evidences that the direction of Mr Nehru was right. He even quotes Mr Obama that mixed economy was the best option. If Obama really thought so, he would have done something in this direction. Did he? It is the established historical fact that policies of Nehru led to division of India, dispute over Kashmir, losing war against China and leaving India as a rich country with poor people. A China with all the military might and 7 times bigger economy than India, can't dare to dictate terms to India. This is the policy in right direction............Bharat Mata ki Jai.

  • @amjadkhan474
    @amjadkhan474 3 роки тому +56

    This proves that it takes deep sense of knowledge and understanding to even know the essence of India

    • @malaydeb2895
      @malaydeb2895 3 роки тому

      Absolutely. India is so vast, varied and complex. Yet a great edifice of "Unity in Diversity".

    • @austin426512
      @austin426512 3 роки тому +2

      Gazwa e Hind planning?

    • @amjadkhan474
      @amjadkhan474 3 роки тому +3

      @@austin426512 don't know about gazwa e hind, but I know chutiya-e-hind now.

    • @himdude9637
      @himdude9637 3 роки тому +3

      You are right. India can't be understood from islamic prism. So islam chod insan bane

    • @gagansharma5594
      @gagansharma5594 3 роки тому

      @khizer Khan fair point. Takes a subtle outlook, deep understanding and patient effort. A long amalgamation of ancient Dharmic lineage and the more recent Abrahamic thought culminating into current chaos. Still, we will overcome this darkness that spreads in Kali Yuya. Needs love, care and wisdom to dissect and process.

  • @ravin2363
    @ravin2363 3 роки тому +575

    Bharat Mata is nothing but the people of the country. If people are suffering, Bharat mata is also suffering. Anyone tells you to see both of them differently is running an agenda. Country is nothing without its citizens. Now take the example of people who kill citizens and chant bharat Mata ki jai, aren't they killing the very soul of Bharat mata?

    • @teamofmultitalents
      @teamofmultitalents 3 роки тому +16

      Yes they are
      Stories they believe have made them so.. until they suffer personally it's difficult to make them understand

    • @misahasunke5914
      @misahasunke5914 3 роки тому +14

      Bhaiyo Beheno, hum bache na bache, humare log bache na bache, yeh desh bachna chahiye!

    • @akshayahuja2798
      @akshayahuja2798 3 роки тому +7

      Grt

    • @thomasjefferson4065
      @thomasjefferson4065 3 роки тому +7

      👏👏👏 well said

    • @The_Romi_Studio
      @The_Romi_Studio 3 роки тому +11

      Sadly many people are not thinking on these lines.. Jai Bharat mata

  • @bonglicious7342
    @bonglicious7342 3 роки тому +34

    Very crucial issues were raised and discussed

  • @DS-zo4wr
    @DS-zo4wr 3 роки тому +90

    'When two experienced minds talk to each other, it ignite other ardent minds.'

    • @shivbhadoriya48
      @shivbhadoriya48 3 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/Vly2QuL1UBA/v-deo.html

    • @shivbhadoriya48
      @shivbhadoriya48 3 роки тому

      क्यू तुम्हारे पास खुद का दिमाग नही हैं जो दूसरे ignite कर रहे हैं ।

    • @vinaynigam4909
      @vinaynigam4909 3 роки тому

      If someone has no ideology such people are like bin pending ka lota.

    • @yogitasharma9120
      @yogitasharma9120 3 роки тому +3

      @@shivbhadoriya48 It's called learning ... keeping an open mind to educate yourself for the better!

  • @shekhawatsingh6074
    @shekhawatsingh6074 3 роки тому +11

    What a great conversation!!!
    Its worth to watch this dialogue to understand many burning issues and solutions of modern India.

  • @nitinbansal1600
    @nitinbansal1600 3 роки тому +79

    Wow. I am speechless, such a beautiful conversation. Everyone must listen to these two most learned people.

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      Javed Ji is as rational as he always is. However, this Mr Agarwal thinks, the people of India are fools. He tries to prove with silly evidences that the direction of Mr Nehru was right. He even quotes Mr Obama that mixed economy was the best option. If Obama really thought so, he would have done something in this direction. Did he? It is the established historical fact that policies of Nehru led to division of India, dispute over Kashmir, losing war against China and leaving India as a rich country with poor people. A China with all the military might and 7 times bigger economy than India, can't dare to dictate terms to India. This is the policy in right direction............Bharat Mata ki Jai.

    • @pranavthakur329
      @pranavthakur329 3 роки тому +2

      @@tejtiwary4309 Har kisi k comment mein jaake same hi response chipka de rahe ho Tiwary ji 🤣 kya baat hai? Bhajpa IT cell se nahi jude hue ho?

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      @@pranavthakur329 It takes time to construct a useful comment. There is nothing wrong in sending to all those who I think it is relevant for. By the way, I am not fro Bhajpa IT cell.

    • @pranavthakur329
      @pranavthakur329 3 роки тому

      @@tejtiwary4309 Lol true there's nothing wrong with it. Just out of curiosity tell me aur kitne logo pe chipkaya ye "useful" comment?

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      @@pranavthakur329 The three big ones on approx 30 all togather. There are some indivisual conversation numbering approx the same.

  • @gkb31
    @gkb31 3 роки тому +16

    I totally agree. शिक्षा ही एकमात्र विकल्प है जो मनुष्य को तार्किक और विवेकशील बना सकती है और यही शिक्षा का सर्वोच्च उद्देश्य है....

  • @drjpbaghel6922
    @drjpbaghel6922 3 роки тому +11

    ऐसे विचारक ही देश की असली ताकत हैं ।

  • @leonard310
    @leonard310 3 роки тому +95

    One of my most favorite books. Highly recommended to everyone

    • @kevinpatel4331
      @kevinpatel4331 3 роки тому +5

      @Manish Erande Please, use your brain. At least for our country.

    • @excalibur6159
      @excalibur6159 3 роки тому +5

      @Manish Erande subject matter is hindu writer is hindu, but sanghis have mind of Satan.
      Can't deal with them...

    • @mohammadkhalid7885
      @mohammadkhalid7885 3 роки тому +5

      @Manish Erande brother manish , if you are reading anti muslim books just to hate muslims , your conscience, compassion , humility , kindness as a human has already died. and most importantly you are adding poison to your vision of others. and i can read pro hindu books as well as anti muslim books.

    • @kevinpatel4331
      @kevinpatel4331 3 роки тому +4

      @Manish Erande There is a reason why we have nations like Islamic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Pakistan, etc.... and not Christian republic of America / England / France, nor Hindu republic of India / Nepal, Buddhist republic of Maynmar/China. Don't become like them just because you vehemently disagree with them. Don't sell you brain and become like muslims just cause you don't like them. If you make India, a Hindu republic of India what difference is between you and an Islamist ?

    • @himdude9637
      @himdude9637 3 роки тому

      You are right
      islam chod insan bane

  • @umeshdubey5955
    @umeshdubey5955 3 роки тому +3

    जावेद अख्तर साहब के विचारों का तो मैं पहले से ही कायल था लेकिन आदरणीय श्री पुरुषोत्तम अग्रवाल जी के विचारों ने मुझे बेहद आवश्यक रोशनी दी है।
    मैं इस किताब को खरीदकर पढ़ने के लिए बेताब हूँ।
    खेद इस बात का है कि पूरी बातचीत के अंत में यह नही बताया कि यह किताब घर बैठे मंगाई किस लिंक के माध्यम से जा सकती है...!

    • @sam_srk
      @sam_srk 3 роки тому

      He was chairman of UPSC interview board

  • @pratiksagar6239
    @pratiksagar6239 3 роки тому +15

    Always a pleasure to listen Javed sahab

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      No one thinks that India shoul be disintegrated and merged into Pakistan, China, Bangladesh and Shrilanka. If someone thinks so, this piece of writing is not for him.
      As we believe, India should exist and prosper as a nation, we need to find why are we a nation?
      Some historian will say that we were never a nation. It is a creation of British. Although it may be partly true, it is not the full truth. If British were so good in building large nations, they would have kept a big one for themselves as well. Today, they are limited to a tiny island. Therefore, this argument is defeated. Some will say; Mahatma Gandhi, the father of the nation created India when the people of the land got united under his leadership to fight against British rule and over threw them. This argument is also not true as the people of Dhaka, New Delhi and Lahore faught togather against British though we are three different nations. Someone like Purushottam Ji says that the nationhood of India is unique in the world. It is unity in diversity. Why should we believe it? If it didn't work before 1947, why are we so confident that it will work in future?
      India is an ancient cultural nation, extending from Himalaya to Kanyakumari and Hindukush to Myamar. (Even Mr Agarwal and his god Nehru Ji believed though a bit late) The geographical territory of our nation has shrunk as we haven't nourished it properly. In fact, people don't know where is the root. Therefore, we don't irrigate and nourish it. Some of us are taught that it is unity in diversity, so we spray nutrients on the branches. More precisely on weaker branches.
      Without being politically correct and in the larger interest of the nation with its citizens, I reiterate with full conviction; the root and stem of our nation is its hinduness. All the branches of of diversity would flourish on it and will give vivid colours of greatness if the root is healthy and the stem is strong.
      Hinduness of every citizen needs to be identified and nurtured. Everryone in the country has his or her hindu connection either by birth or through ancestry. A minor segment which believe that they migrated from somewhere else and were never hindu in any sense could be persuaded to accept the hinduness by association. A large number of indians living abroad aquire and assimilate the assence of the nationhood of the land truly and effortlessly. Therefore, it is not difficult to do the same here. However, before requesting the migrants to establish association with hinduness, the indegenous population should disply it in full frame. Arousing their hinduness and reassuring their non-political religious aspirations can be achieved easily if we make an honest attempt.
      A healthy hinduness which is honest, hard working, compassionate and accomodating; can bring the old glory to our beloved Bharat Mata.
      Any attack of our hinduness is an attack on 'Bharat Mata'.

  • @archanachowdhury9862
    @archanachowdhury9862 3 роки тому +3

    बहुत ही उम्दा संभाषण । आप दोनो दिग्गजो का असंख्य धन्यवाद । आशा हे श्रोताओ की मन की खिड़किया खुलेंगी । 🙌🙌

    • @sasyed8196
      @sasyed8196 3 роки тому

      अंधभक्तो को पसंद नही,वे इस महंगाई में भी खुश हैं, आमदनी बढ़ी नही,रोज़गार मिल नही रहा किन्तु पेट्रोल गैस दाम बढ़ गए,अब छमता नही।

  • @pranavdagaonkar6178
    @pranavdagaonkar6178 3 роки тому +18

    Thank you Newslaundry for publishing this. It was so refreshing to hear the two learned and well read gentlemen (a rarity in these times).🙏

  • @keeplearningandgrowing7111
    @keeplearningandgrowing7111 3 роки тому +21

    Unite, Speak up against Injustice, Unemployment, rights. Save Democracy Save Constitution. Live for Humanity Help needy. Jai Bharat Jai Hind Jai Jawan Jai Kisan 🙏❤️❤️

  • @jack_reacher456
    @jack_reacher456 3 роки тому +57

    लोग अभी भी नेहरू को पढ़ लिख और समझने की कोशिश कर रहे है यही नेहरू जी को महानता है🙏🙏

    • @snowcrystal10
      @snowcrystal10 Рік тому +2

      बेईमान हैं नेहरु

    • @snowcrystal10
      @snowcrystal10 Рік тому

      पाकिस्तान की बाउंड्री 48 km दूर थी जिसको 250km कर दिया यहीं महानता है

    • @pirrupdki4948
      @pirrupdki4948 Рік тому

      shi kaha bhai aapne...nehru ko smjhna or pdhna wakai ak alg kaam hai

    • @snowcrystal10
      @snowcrystal10 Рік тому

      खुद को बुद्धिमानी का नमूना समझता था ,
      जितना सोचता था , खुद ही समझ लिया कि दुनिया को वही सोचना बंद कर देना चाहिए

    • @Mohammad_Khan
      @Mohammad_Khan Рік тому

      ​@@snowcrystal10jjjv😊0v,

  • @shashisheikh8401
    @shashisheikh8401 3 роки тому +14

    Persons who read jawahar lal know what was his ideology and what were his programmes.he was innovative but positive.he valued the feelings of indians.

  • @damanerehmat4104
    @damanerehmat4104 3 роки тому +12

    Two Educated Personalities Love from 🇵🇰💕💞❤️

  • @debashisbanerjee7082
    @debashisbanerjee7082 3 роки тому +30

    What a fantastic discussion between two educated people. We have to now wait for channel like news laundry for such education. Earlier many news channels did this. Keep up the good work NL.

    • @malaydeb2895
      @malaydeb2895 3 роки тому +1

      Greetings from a fellow traveller. মুক্তচিন্তার স্বাধীনতা আজ সবচেয়ে জরুরি।

    • @malaydeb2895
      @malaydeb2895 3 роки тому

      @Stallion Spirit UP se toh behat hai na.

  • @tabrezkhan3834
    @tabrezkhan3834 3 роки тому +10

    Kal raat me hi soch ra tha bht time se Javed sahab dekh ni rae
    Thanks newslaundry.

    • @vodafone3732
      @vodafone3732 3 роки тому

      Jawad sahab ne logo ko smajhana kam kardiya hai jabse india mein 90 percentage chotiya ke population badh gayi hai isliya Jawad sahab kam boltey hai..

  • @sunitamahesh7416
    @sunitamahesh7416 3 роки тому +23

    किसानों की हालत देखकर जो गुस्से से फूल जाते है,
    नेता, विधायक, मंत्री बनने के बाद किसानों को भूल जाते है

  • @veganvoyage6549
    @veganvoyage6549 2 роки тому +10

    This interview is so logical, rational and Full of knowledge that i watched in parts otherwise my mind would have exploded 😭

  • @balakrishnankt5822
    @balakrishnankt5822 3 роки тому +25

    I have bought the wonderful book by agarwalji. How beautiful the vision of jawaharlal nehru. Thanks purushothamji for this wonderful book....
    Secular indian democracy must win.
    Respect for our former prime minister jawaharlal nehru increased very much more after reading the book.
    Please post the english version of this interview. Newslaundry

    • @parikhanil2003
      @parikhanil2003 3 роки тому +1

      WE ARE TOUGHT WRONG THINGS WHEN NEHRU WAS OUR PM. BUT NOW AT THIS AGE OF 75 WE CAME TO KNOW HOW NEHRU AND HIS FAMILY AND FRIENDS RUINED OUR COUNTRY AND PEOPLE.

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому +1

      Joke of the day. Nehru's direction was right.😂😂

  • @Finance_Life
    @Finance_Life 3 роки тому +15

    Everyone must listen this conversation.

  • @ahmedsayyed4259
    @ahmedsayyed4259 3 роки тому +64

    Both are very thoughtful people
    Mixture is the real beauty of India 🇮🇳
    👍

    • @himdude9637
      @himdude9637 3 роки тому +3

      islam chod insan bane. Nahi to ye mixture jaldi hi khatam ho kar sharia hoga

    • @ahmedsayyed4259
      @ahmedsayyed4259 3 роки тому +1

      @@himdude9637 thanks for advice, I would love to die as a Muslim but neither I will advise you to change your religion nor I will force you to change your religion , however you must follow your religion as per your religious books, hope you will understand and be positive

    • @himdude9637
      @himdude9637 3 роки тому +3

      @@ahmedsayyed4259 the moment you said you will not ask me to come to islam. You ceased to be a Muslim. You are just a munafiq born from muslim parents
      I don't have my religious book. I follow Dharma

    • @ahmedsayyed4259
      @ahmedsayyed4259 3 роки тому +1

      @@himdude9637 thank you for your certificate

    • @ahmedsayyed4259
      @ahmedsayyed4259 3 роки тому

      @@himdude9637 how 😱? Every person born as a Muslim so how you declare me munafiq? 🤔

  • @NiraliSherni
    @NiraliSherni 3 роки тому +43

    Look at the intellectual honesty of this discussion - cannot imagine such self-awareness or expression thereof from the other side of the ideological aisle

    • @malaydeb2895
      @malaydeb2895 3 роки тому +5

      Very good observation. These people have academic credentials. The other side of ideological divide is mostly comprised of WhatsApp University graduates.

    • @Black182heart
      @Black182heart 3 роки тому +2

      @@malaydeb2895 and convicted criminals.

    • @malaydeb2895
      @malaydeb2895 3 роки тому

      @@Black182heart I didn't include them out of modesty.

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      When Mr Agarwal says Achetan Bhagat, his hatred for individual becomes apparent.

  • @pemaccompany8623
    @pemaccompany8623 3 роки тому +7

    BRILLIANT + BEAUTIFUL + INFORMATIVE + INTELLECTUAL CONVERSATION N BOTH PANELLISTS

  • @nasreenbegum9561
    @nasreenbegum9561 3 роки тому +17

    After a long time hearing Jawed sir in his unique style of talking..with another stalwart Purushottam ji..feeling elated..

    • @himdude9637
      @himdude9637 3 роки тому +1

      Jawed sahab ki trah Islam chod insan bane

    • @ShyamKumar-kw9dc
      @ShyamKumar-kw9dc 3 роки тому

      Satyarth prakash padhe insaan bane . Jahilon ka jahilon ke liye banaya mazhab chod insaan bane .

  • @taiyabalifaizan4329
    @taiyabalifaizan4329 3 роки тому +25

    Looking forward for more of these intellectual's talks

    • @himdude9637
      @himdude9637 3 роки тому +2

      Don't do that. Haram hai islam me

    • @shivbhadoriya48
      @shivbhadoriya48 3 роки тому

      @@himdude9637 दोस्त ua-cam.com/video/Vly2QuL1UBA/v-deo.html

  • @sheraaxz
    @sheraaxz 3 роки тому +4

    Enlightning,, this is the real talent and jewels of Indian society,, Great job Newslaundry

  • @shaaddhillon3819
    @shaaddhillon3819 3 роки тому +10

    Fascinating discussion. Good job news laundry

  • @divyanshkumar6453
    @divyanshkumar6453 3 роки тому +2

    Bahut achha subject discuss hua aur guest bhi Bahut ache bulaye the. Thanks to the news laundry for such talks.

  • @nkmadhukar7340
    @nkmadhukar7340 3 роки тому +32

    Sir debate was so knowledgeable. Nehru Sir was so brilliant, his vision was so clear that today because of him policies we are competing. globally.

    • @tanishqraj123
      @tanishqraj123 3 роки тому +1

      Then also explain how india lost 1962 war because of Nehru's china love and wrong policies and why he took the post of prime minister even when he lost the Congress president Elections two times.....

    • @ratnadeepdutta4920
      @ratnadeepdutta4920 3 роки тому +1

      Yes he was a great intellectual but not a good leader . A man can be a good leader only with strength in character.

    • @malaydeb2895
      @malaydeb2895 3 роки тому

      @@tanishqraj123 There was no election for congress president. He was selected by Gandhi. And even Sardar Patel agreed with Gandhi. Read history of congress and independence movement from writers like Prof Agarwal, not at twitter, facebook and whatsapp university.

    • @malaydeb2895
      @malaydeb2895 3 роки тому

      @@ratnadeepdutta4920 Hitler, Stalin, Mao-tse-tung, Nathuram Godse all have strength of character I know.

    • @malaydeb2895
      @malaydeb2895 3 роки тому

      @@tanishqraj123 Did India have the necessary military strength to face China in 1962. The result would have been same no matter who would have been the PM in 1962. That's the bitter truth.

  • @belalhussain_
    @belalhussain_ 3 роки тому +7

    Thank you NL for sharing this wonderful conversation

  • @harishsehgal6961
    @harishsehgal6961 3 роки тому +8

    Great discussion,Have been missing such thoughts since 2014.Totally forgot about t(e present situation of Our country.Having came back from the past after the discussion was over,a unforeseen fear engulfed me of the present conditions of our country.Never imagine that country with such a beautiful past will be governed by such people.Oh what happened and worst still to come.

  • @cancerianhitender
    @cancerianhitender 3 роки тому +13

    Thank you newslaundry for uploading this

  • @sumitkapoor8771
    @sumitkapoor8771 3 роки тому +15

    We need more people like these two in our country.

    • @abhid7507
      @abhid7507 3 роки тому

      @Bear Brar So true.

  • @krishnapratap9416
    @krishnapratap9416 3 роки тому +7

    Really knowledgable...I don't understand those people who disagreed with this talk🤔🤔🤔

    • @shivbhadoriya48
      @shivbhadoriya48 3 роки тому +1

      Watch the jaipur dialogue channel, then you will find the narrative

    • @mastmaula2452
      @mastmaula2452 3 роки тому +1

      @@shivbhadoriya48 JD is the best eye opener channel with IAS officer Sanjay dixit Brother showing the nitty gritty of shallowness woven by these hypocrites

    • @shivbhadoriya48
      @shivbhadoriya48 3 роки тому +1

      @@mastmaula2452 yes my friend आप भी चैनल का प्रचार करे ।

    • @mastmaula2452
      @mastmaula2452 3 роки тому +1

      @@shivbhadoriya48 sure! I do!
      instead, we have to do it as our duty!

    • @mastmaula2452
      @mastmaula2452 3 роки тому

      @@shivbhadoriya48 smaran rakhiyega! We gotta take JD to a million! I've done my bit ask others as well!

  • @prasadpatole75
    @prasadpatole75 3 роки тому +7

    It's a mesmerizing experience to listen this gem...Javed saab❤️

    • @shivbhadoriya48
      @shivbhadoriya48 3 роки тому

      दोस्त ua-cam.com/video/SFoYEcEWPeo/v-deo.html

    • @mastmaula2452
      @mastmaula2452 3 роки тому +1

      He's no! Saab than an opportunist eying upon any given opportunity to get you and yr ilks as yr slave like his ancestors did

  • @NehaKarode_Music
    @NehaKarode_Music 3 роки тому +35

    Javed Akhtar after so long

    • @himdude9637
      @himdude9637 3 роки тому

      Bahut badla badla sa bol raha hai. Ab pahle wala nahi raha

    • @shivbhadoriya48
      @shivbhadoriya48 3 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/SFoYEcEWPeo/v-deo.html

  • @seema8203
    @seema8203 3 роки тому +4

    thank you news laundry for this best program

  • @thebatmenbegins
    @thebatmenbegins 3 роки тому +4

    Arré waah...A big thank you to newlaundry for this...🙏

  • @ranjeetkkr
    @ranjeetkkr 3 роки тому +10

    The beauty of books can never fade away !

  • @udayadityaborthakur9299
    @udayadityaborthakur9299 3 роки тому +4

    bhai maja aa gaya. bohot din baad meaningful coversation suna.. thanks newslaundry

  • @sud5346
    @sud5346 3 роки тому +28

    This is what I call a "healthy criticism". Listen the criticism and you will receive a pure knowledge. Forget the background of these 2 people..forget what religion they follow..even forget their name for a few moment..just listen the conversation. This is exactly I'm proud of being Indian.

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      If Mr Agarwal says that direction of Nehru's economic policy was right, it is the discussion between a darbari writer and Javed Ji. Nehru was a disgrace for our nation. Dukh ke siwa kuchh nahin diya Nehru ne is desh ko. He is a disgrace for the country.

    • @lalitgautam9118
      @lalitgautam9118 2 роки тому

      @@tejtiwary4309 you can have your opinion.. please argue with facts.. it would be better...

    • @pirrupdki4948
      @pirrupdki4948 Рік тому

      ​@@tejtiwary4309you will surely get ur ans once you meet him...

  • @Archit630
    @Archit630 3 роки тому +23

    Already ordered ✅

    • @Rattannamste
      @Rattannamste 3 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/Vly2QuL1UBA/v-deo.html

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому +1

      No one thinks that India shoul be disintegrated and merged into Pakistan, China, Bangladesh and Shrilanka. If someone thinks so, this piece of writing is not for him.
      As we believe, India should exist and prosper as a nation, we need to find why are we a nation?
      Some historian will say that we were never a nation. It is a creation of British. Although it may be partly true, it is not the full truth. If British were so good in building large nations, they would have kept a big one for themselves as well. Today, they are limited to a tiny island. Therefore, this argument is defeated. Some will say; Mahatma Gandhi, the father of the nation created India when the people of the land got united under his leadership to fight against British rule and over threw them. This argument is also not true as the people of Dhaka, New Delhi and Lahore faught togather against British though we are three different nations. Someone like Purushottam Ji says that the nationhood of India is unique in the world. It is unity in diversity. Why should we believe it? If it didn't work before 1947, why are we so confident that it will work in future?
      India is an ancient cultural nation, extending from Himalaya to Kanyakumari and Hindukush to Myamar. (Even Mr Agarwal and his god Nehru Ji believed though a bit late) The geographical territory of our nation has shrunk as we haven't nourished it properly. In fact, people don't know where is the root. Therefore, we don't irrigate and nourish it. Some of us are taught that it is unity in diversity, so we spray nutrients on the branches. More precisely on weaker branches.
      Without being politically correct and in the larger interest of the nation with its citizens, I reiterate with full conviction; the root and stem of our nation is its hinduness. All the branches of of diversity would flourish on it and will give vivid colours of greatness if the root is healthy and the stem is strong.
      Hinduness of every citizen needs to be identified and nurtured. Everryone in the country has his or her hindu connection either by birth or through ancestry. A minor segment which believe that they migrated from somewhere else and were never hindu in any sense could be persuaded to accept the hinduness by association. A large number of indians living abroad aquire and assimilate the assence of the nationhood of the land truly and effortlessly. Therefore, it is not difficult to do the same here. However, before requesting the migrants to establish association with hinduness, the indegenous population should disply it in full frame. Arousing their hinduness and reassuring their non-political religious aspirations can be achieved easily if we make an honest attempt.
      A healthy hinduness which is honest, hard working, compassionate and accomodating; can bring the old glory to our beloved Bharat Mata.
      Any attack of our hinduness is an attack on 'Bharat Mata'.

  • @karanaurora7644
    @karanaurora7644 3 роки тому +44

    Wonderful to listen to intellectual minds rather than garbage news and garbage people

  • @anthonysantamaria9473
    @anthonysantamaria9473 3 роки тому +2

    Very good, U all deserved

  • @meenasharma5543
    @meenasharma5543 3 роки тому +4

    Lovely discussion on insights to Nehru as and a person,politician & a seer for the future of India.Kudos to Shri Agrawal for writing this book & also to Shri Javed Akhtar for raising some important questions nicely replied by Shri Agrawal.

  • @manglem10
    @manglem10 3 роки тому +73

    Arrest nehru for high petrol prices

    • @malaydeb2895
      @malaydeb2895 3 роки тому +3

      Ha.....Ha.....Ha

    • @themindlock5535
      @themindlock5535 3 роки тому

      Was abt to comment the same

    • @akhilg5248
      @akhilg5248 3 роки тому +3

      Yes he brought secularism otherwise India would be having saudi oil wells like US.

    • @riyazansari5465
      @riyazansari5465 3 роки тому

      🤣😂👌🙈🙉

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      Don't arrest anyone for high petrol prices. It is no more regulated and moves up or down depending on crude price which also depends on supply and demand.
      Arrest selfish Nehru's supporters for
      1.Division of India
      2.Non-sense economic policies leaving india a poor country with rich resourses
      3.Kashmir issue
      4.Debacle of 1962 China war
      5. Many more.....

  • @faradmodi9197
    @faradmodi9197 3 роки тому +9

    Javed Saab, a pleasure to hear as always

    • @shivbhadoriya48
      @shivbhadoriya48 3 роки тому +1

      Converted

    • @danishzaheer3600
      @danishzaheer3600 3 роки тому

      @@shivbhadoriya48 you can still revert and worship Ishwara

    • @shivbhadoriya48
      @shivbhadoriya48 3 роки тому

      @@danishzaheer3600 fact is fact पूरे sub continent में सब converted हैं , दिक्कत यह नहीं convert हुए दिक्कत यह है डर की वजह से convert हुए तलवार की वजह से अपनी मां बहन की आबरू बचाने के लिए। किसी ने भी प्यार से इस्लाम नही पकड़ा पता करना जरा अपने ancestor के बारे मैं ।

    • @danishzaheer3600
      @danishzaheer3600 3 роки тому

      @@shivbhadoriya48 You can still revert back to Ishwara if you ancestors were afraid of Brahmins its there fault not yours because vedas teach that children keep on carrying burden of father and start worshipping Almighty Supreme being.

    • @shivbhadoriya48
      @shivbhadoriya48 3 роки тому

      @@danishzaheer3600 nonsense बातें पड़े हैं veda , बात मेरी नही है शाहब बात यहां तुम्हारी है बता नही बने तुम डर की वजह से मुसलमान ।

  • @gordesomesh
    @gordesomesh 3 роки тому +3

    So thoughtful and critical conversation on various topics.. Pleased to watch such an interview in current times.

  • @anuragshankhdhar2444
    @anuragshankhdhar2444 3 роки тому +10

    Javed sahab refused to give autograph on that book and said ma deserve nhi krta... such is the level

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      No one thinks that India shoul be disintegrated and merged into Pakistan, China, Bangladesh and Shrilanka. If someone thinks so, this piece of writing is not for him.
      As we believe, India should exist and prosper as a nation, we need to find why are we a nation?
      Some historian will say that we were never a nation. It is a creation of British. Although it may be partly true, it is not the full truth. If British were so good in building large nations, they would have kept a big one for themselves as well. Today, they are limited to a tiny island. Therefore, this argument is defeated. Some will say; Mahatma Gandhi, the father of the nation created India when the people of the land got united under his leadership to fight against British rule and over threw them. This argument is also not true as the people of Dhaka, New Delhi and Lahore faught togather against British though we are three different nations. Someone like Purushottam Ji says that the nationhood of India is unique in the world. It is unity in diversity. Why should we believe it? If it didn't work before 1947, why are we so confident that it will work in future?
      India is an ancient cultural nation, extending from Himalaya to Kanyakumari and Hindukush to Myamar. (Even Mr Agarwal and his god Nehru Ji believed though a bit late) The geographical territory of our nation has shrunk as we haven't nourished it properly. In fact, people don't know where is the root. Therefore, we don't irrigate and nourish it. Some of us are taught that it is unity in diversity, so we spray nutrients on the branches. More precisely on weaker branches.
      Without being politically correct and in the larger interest of the nation with its citizens, I reiterate with full conviction; the root and stem of our nation is its hinduness. All the branches of of diversity would flourish on it and will give vivid colours of greatness if the root is healthy and the stem is strong.
      Hinduness of every citizen needs to be identified and nurtured. Everryone in the country has his or her hindu connection either by birth or through ancestry. A minor segment which believe that they migrated from somewhere else and were never hindu in any sense could be persuaded to accept the hinduness by association. A large number of indians living abroad aquire and assimilate the assence of the nationhood of the land truly and effortlessly. Therefore, it is not difficult to do the same here. However, before requesting the migrants to establish association with hinduness, the indegenous population should disply it in full frame. Arousing their hinduness and reassuring their non-political religious aspirations can be achieved easily if we make an honest attempt.
      A healthy hinduness which is honest, hard working, compassionate and accomodating; can bring the old glory to our beloved Bharat Mata.
      Any attack of our hinduness is an attack on 'Bharat Mata'.

    • @MsEternalpeace
      @MsEternalpeace 3 роки тому

      No one needs to associate to Hinduness as every faith teaches the same essence and principles and everyone have their own set if values, which they should adhere to by understanding it correctly. Those migrated here dint come as refuges but by conquering the land. And even if someone's ancestors were Hindu as long as as they chose another faith no one has the right to ask them to associate with another faith. Not even ancestors even if today someone wants to leave Hinduism and follow another faith, or leave other faith and follow Hinduism they as human being have full right.
      Stop associating religion with nation which is the root cause of all problems

  • @aseembajpai8303
    @aseembajpai8303 3 роки тому +5

    thank you so much newslaundry... love you a lot. proud subscriber. 😍😘🙏

  • @hardeepsingh4300
    @hardeepsingh4300 3 роки тому +4

    Two of the Eminent personalities to whom we can listen every time, especially on concurrent issues ranging from liberalization, culture, religion, politics to Media and to Social media and Cinema....... Thanks a lot Newslaundry !

  • @sharadgupta9839
    @sharadgupta9839 3 роки тому +3

    A very high quality conversation. Thank you for organizing it and putting it up on Newslaundry. Look forward to reading the book.

  • @naruto5437
    @naruto5437 3 роки тому +3

    wow...this was a great talk...end up watching full session

  • @abhishekmehto8990
    @abhishekmehto8990 3 роки тому +1

    One of the best video on nehru life

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      No one thinks that India shoul be disintegrated and merged into Pakistan, China, Bangladesh and Shrilanka. If someone thinks so, this piece of writing is not for him.
      As we believe, India should exist and prosper as a nation, we need to find why are we a nation?
      Some historian will say that we were never a nation. It is a creation of British. Although it may be partly true, it is not the full truth. If British were so good in building large nations, they would have kept a big one for themselves as well. Today, they are limited to a tiny island. Therefore, this argument is defeated. Some will say; Mahatma Gandhi, the father of the nation created India when the people of the land got united under his leadership to fight against British rule and over threw them. This argument is also not true as the people of Dhaka, New Delhi and Lahore faught togather against British though we are three different nations. Someone like Purushottam Ji says that the nationhood of India is unique in the world. It is unity in diversity. Why should we believe it? If it didn't work before 1947, why are we so confident that it will work in future?
      India is an ancient cultural nation, extending from Himalaya to Kanyakumari and Hindukush to Myamar. (Even Mr Agarwal and his god Nehru Ji believed though a bit late) The geographical territory of our nation has shrunk as we haven't nourished it properly. In fact, people don't know where is the root. Therefore, we don't irrigate and nourish it. Some of us are taught that it is unity in diversity, so we spray nutrients on the branches. More precisely on weaker branches.
      Without being politically correct and in the larger interest of the nation with its citizens, I reiterate with full conviction; the root and stem of our nation is its hinduness. All the branches of of diversity would flourish on it and will give vivid colours of greatness if the root is healthy and the stem is strong.
      Hinduness of every citizen needs to be identified and nurtured. Everryone in the country has his or her hindu connection either by birth or through ancestry. A minor segment which believe that they migrated from somewhere else and were never hindu in any sense could be persuaded to accept the hinduness by association. A large number of indians living abroad aquire and assimilate the assence of the nationhood of the land truly and effortlessly. Therefore, it is not difficult to do the same here. However, before requesting the migrants to establish association with hinduness, the indegenous population should disply it in full frame. Arousing their hinduness and reassuring their non-political religious aspirations can be achieved easily if we make an honest attempt.
      A healthy hinduness which is honest, hard working, compassionate and accomodating; can bring the old glory to our beloved Bharat Mata.
      Any attack of our hinduness is an attack on 'Bharat Mata'.

  • @sushantabiswas8726
    @sushantabiswas8726 3 роки тому +24

    अन्ध विश्वास करने का भी मौलिक अधिकार होता है

  • @malasingh2247
    @malasingh2247 3 роки тому +8

    इससे अच्छी, सारगर्भित और सार्थक बातचीत क्या होगी।

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      No one thinks that India shoul be disintegrated and merged into Pakistan, China, Bangladesh and Shrilanka. If someone thinks so, this piece of writing is not for him.
      As we believe, India should exist and prosper as a nation, we need to find why are we a nation?
      Some historian will say that we were never a nation. It is a creation of British. Although it may be partly true, it is not the full truth. If British were so good in building large nations, they would have kept a big one for themselves as well. Today, they are limited to a tiny island. Therefore, this argument is defeated. Some will say; Mahatma Gandhi, the father of the nation created India when the people of the land got united under his leadership to fight against British rule and over threw them. This argument is also not true as the people of Dhaka, New Delhi and Lahore faught togather against British though we are three different nations. Someone like Purushottam Ji says that the nationhood of India is unique in the world. It is unity in diversity. Why should we believe it? If it didn't work before 1947, why are we so confident that it will work in future?
      India is an ancient cultural nation, extending from Himalaya to Kanyakumari and Hindukush to Myamar. (Even Mr Agarwal and his god Nehru Ji believed though a bit late) The geographical territory of our nation has shrunk as we haven't nourished it properly. In fact, people don't know where is the root. Therefore, we don't irrigate and nourish it. Some of us are taught that it is unity in diversity, so we spray nutrients on the branches. More precisely on weaker branches.
      Without being politically correct and in the larger interest of the nation with its citizens, I reiterate with full conviction; the root and stem of our nation is its hinduness. All the branches of of diversity would flourish on it and will give vivid colours of greatness if the root is healthy and the stem is strong.
      Hinduness of every citizen needs to be identified and nurtured. Everryone in the country has his or her hindu connection either by birth or through ancestry. A minor segment which believe that they migrated from somewhere else and were never hindu in any sense could be persuaded to accept the hinduness by association. A large number of indians living abroad aquire and assimilate the assence of the nationhood of the land truly and effortlessly. Therefore, it is not difficult to do the same here. However, before requesting the migrants to establish association with hinduness, the indegenous population should disply it in full frame. Arousing their hinduness and reassuring their non-political religious aspirations can be achieved easily if we make an honest attempt.
      A healthy hinduness which is honest, hard working, compassionate and accomodating; can bring the old glory to our beloved Bharat Mata.
      Any attack of our hinduness is an attack on 'Bharat Mata'.

  • @WHITEDEVIL-yy9zb
    @WHITEDEVIL-yy9zb 3 роки тому +4

    Wonderful talk lot to learn about
    Thanks to news laundry

  • @manishdhariwal8689
    @manishdhariwal8689 3 роки тому

    बहुत ही अच्छा प्रोग्राम है श्री पुरुषोत्तम जी अग्रवाल को बहुत बहुत हादिक बधाई व शुभकामनाएं किताब के लिए

  • @gulzarhussain.437
    @gulzarhussain.437 3 роки тому +4

    I am lucky to listen these two intellectuals. India will miss them when they wont be around.

  • @meradeshmahan7464
    @meradeshmahan7464 3 роки тому +1

    Very impressive, logical program and I will say thanks , organised the event
    specially thanks to writer proshottam Agarwal,kown hai bharat mata and Javed akhtar sb

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      No one thinks that India shoul be disintegrated and merged into Pakistan, China, Bangladesh and Shrilanka. If someone thinks so, this piece of writing is not for him.
      As we believe, India should exist and prosper as a nation, we need to find why are we a nation?
      Some historian will say that we were never a nation. It is a creation of British. Although it may be partly true, it is not the full truth. If British were so good in building large nations, they would have kept a big one for themselves as well. Today, they are limited to a tiny island. Therefore, this argument is defeated. Some will say; Mahatma Gandhi, the father of the nation created India when the people of the land got united under his leadership to fight against British rule and over threw them. This argument is also not true as the people of Dhaka, New Delhi and Lahore faught togather against British though we are three different nations. Someone like Purushottam Ji says that the nationhood of India is unique in the world. It is unity in diversity. Why should we believe it? If it didn't work before 1947, why are we so confident that it will work in future?
      India is an ancient cultural nation, extending from Himalaya to Kanyakumari and Hindukush to Myamar. (Even Mr Agarwal and his god Nehru Ji believed though a bit late) The geographical territory of our nation has shrunk as we haven't nourished it properly. In fact, people don't know where is the root. Therefore, we don't irrigate and nourish it. Some of us are taught that it is unity in diversity, so we spray nutrients on the branches. More precisely on weaker branches.
      Without being politically correct and in the larger interest of the nation with its citizens, I reiterate with full conviction; the root and stem of our nation is its hinduness. All the branches of of diversity would flourish on it and will give vivid colours of greatness if the root is healthy and the stem is strong.
      Hinduness of every citizen needs to be identified and nurtured. Everryone in the country has his or her hindu connection either by birth or through ancestry. A minor segment which believe that they migrated from somewhere else and were never hindu in any sense could be persuaded to accept the hinduness by association. A large number of indians living abroad aquire and assimilate the assence of the nationhood of the land truly and effortlessly. Therefore, it is not difficult to do the same here. However, before requesting the migrants to establish association with hinduness, the indegenous population should disply it in full frame. Arousing their hinduness and reassuring their non-political religious aspirations can be achieved easily if we make an honest attempt.
      A healthy hinduness which is honest, hard working, compassionate and accomodating; can bring the old glory to our beloved Bharat Mata.
      Any attack of our hinduness is an attack on 'Bharat Mata'.

  • @akashdalal1919
    @akashdalal1919 3 роки тому +3

    What a wonderful and informative talk!

  • @tanzeel.shedde
    @tanzeel.shedde 3 роки тому +5

    A very enlightening and "rational" dialogue

    • @shivbhadoriya48
      @shivbhadoriya48 3 роки тому

      Rational r u serious , watch this also
      ua-cam.com/video/SFoYEcEWPeo/v-deo.html

  • @diabloo7
    @diabloo7 3 роки тому +6

    thanks NL for bringing this on your platform. took a day to go through but worth the time.

  • @malcolmjaan2239
    @malcolmjaan2239 2 роки тому +1

    great man off india from mallickjohn australia

  • @jiteshjigyanshu7964
    @jiteshjigyanshu7964 3 роки тому +12

    Please bring more such shows

  • @rahulsingh-xj1ly
    @rahulsingh-xj1ly 3 роки тому +1

    i really enjoyed this video ..... thanks news laundry .

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      I respect Gandhi Ji. His thought and actions were deeply imbeded in India. He sacrificed everything including his family for the country.
      Nehru wasn't the same. In fact, he was a selfish, megalomaniac and short sighted man. He didn't agree for Jinna to be the PM of united India and became instrumental in division of India. He experimented with the economic future of India and left it as a far poorer country than its potential. If Chetan Bhagat says that Nehru would have changed the economic model in 1955 when he realised that it is not working, what is wrong in it? Manmohan Singh did it in 1991 but people who carried it over the years were selfish people who sacrificed the nation for there political aspirations. The darbari historians like Mr Agarwal is still justifying it and displaying his hatred for many by mocking at them.
      What was the reason behind Nehru accepting Tibet as part of China. Did he seriously feel that Tibet is inherent part of China? Was he scared of China? If he thought that it is not right why he didn't oppose? If he was scared, why didn't he align with the world powers to counter it? How could he support China for the membership of Security Council? Was he a fool or a extremely short sighted, scared leader of the largest future democracy in the world? Did he timely make any serious attempt to establish co-operation with the world powers to defend our borders. There are a number of disasters done by him which could have been prevented if he was a leader who deserved respect. For me he is a disgrace.

  • @maheshsharma7767
    @maheshsharma7767 3 роки тому +7

    न्यूज़ लॉन्ड्री good job

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      No one thinks that India shoul be disintegrated and merged into Pakistan, China, Bangladesh and Shrilanka. If someone thinks so, this piece of writing is not for him.
      As we believe, India should exist and prosper as a nation, we need to find why are we a nation?
      Some historian will say that we were never a nation. It is a creation of British. Although it may be partly true, it is not the full truth. If British were so good in building large nations, they would have kept a big one for themselves as well. Today, they are limited to a tiny island. Therefore, this argument is defeated. Some will say; Mahatma Gandhi, the father of the nation created India when the people of the land got united under his leadership to fight against British rule and over threw them. This argument is also not true as the people of Dhaka, New Delhi and Lahore faught togather against British though we are three different nations. Someone like Purushottam Ji says that the nationhood of India is unique in the world. It is unity in diversity. Why should we believe it? If it didn't work before 1947, why are we so confident that it will work in future?
      India is an ancient cultural nation, extending from Himalaya to Kanyakumari and Hindukush to Myamar. (Even Mr Agarwal and his god Nehru Ji believed though a bit late) The geographical territory of our nation has shrunk as we haven't nourished it properly. In fact, people don't know where is the root. Therefore, we don't irrigate and nourish it. Some of us are taught that it is unity in diversity, so we spray nutrients on the branches. More precisely on weaker branches.
      Without being politically correct and in the larger interest of the nation with its citizens, I reiterate with full conviction; the root and stem of our nation is its hinduness. All the branches of of diversity would flourish on it and will give vivid colours of greatness if the root is healthy and the stem is strong.
      Hinduness of every citizen needs to be identified and nurtured. Everryone in the country has his or her hindu connection either by birth or through ancestry. A minor segment which believe that they migrated from somewhere else and were never hindu in any sense could be persuaded to accept the hinduness by association. A large number of indians living abroad aquire and assimilate the assence of the nationhood of the land truly and effortlessly. Therefore, it is not difficult to do the same here. However, before requesting the migrants to establish association with hinduness, the indegenous population should disply it in full frame. Arousing their hinduness and reassuring their non-political religious aspirations can be achieved easily if we make an honest attempt.
      A healthy hinduness which is honest, hard working, compassionate and accomodating; can bring the old glory to our beloved Bharat Mata.
      Any attack of our hinduness is an attack on 'Bharat Mata'.

  • @laljeetchauhan728
    @laljeetchauhan728 Рік тому

    बहुत दिनों बाद एक अच्छी वार्ता सुनने को मिली इस चैनल को धन्यवाद।आगे भी जनतांत्रिक समाजवाद और वैज्ञानिक समाजवाद पर ऐसे ही निष्पक्ष और निडर विचारको का वार्तालाप। सूनवाने की कृपा करेंगे तो बड़ी कृपा होगी।जो किसी भी महापुरुष की कमियों और अच्छाइयों को निष्पक्ष रूप से समान सहित प्रकट कर सकें।मानव है गलती हो सकती है।बड़ा मुश्किल होता है जब मानव को भगवान बनाकर यह प्रमाणपत्र दे दिया जाता है कि वे झूठ नहीं बोल सकते और न तो कोई ग़लती ही कर सकते हैं।

  • @justbeseriouss2477
    @justbeseriouss2477 3 роки тому +21

    join the campaign of ssc, railway and other govt job students
    #modi_rojgar_do
    on 25 feb at 11
    👍👍👍

    • @sasyed8196
      @sasyed8196 3 роки тому

      रोजगार है कहाँ, अभी 2017 का लटका पड़ा है

    • @justbeseriouss2477
      @justbeseriouss2477 3 роки тому

      @@sasyed8196 hm, lkin khte to rhna hi hoga

  • @ramkumarmaurya3190
    @ramkumarmaurya3190 3 роки тому +1

    देश हमारा प्यारा भारत और जिसका हर नागरिक सिर्फ भारतीय ही है
    गर्व से कहो कि
    *हम भारतीय हैं*

    • @sasyed8196
      @sasyed8196 3 роки тому

      हाँ, मेजोरिटी की आवाज़ भारत मे सुनी जाएगी जो जहां मैजोरिटी में हैं उनकी औकात है, लोकडौन में रहो, गुलाम बनो जो हम कहें वही सुनो अगर बोले तो जगह जेल है।

  • @noorul9944
    @noorul9944 3 роки тому +4

    Bahut jarurat hai es kitab ki es samay ...

  • @AtheistRupeshPaswan
    @AtheistRupeshPaswan Рік тому +1

    जावेद अख्तर साहेब और पुरुषोत्तम अग्रवाल साहेब आप जैसे निष्पक्ष निस्वार्थ महान व्यक्ति को सुपर सैल्यूट 📚🌹💖🇮🇳✍️🙏

  • @paulm.k.8740
    @paulm.k.8740 3 роки тому +12

    The Nehru Era will be remembered as the Golden Era of India.

  • @DarkKnight-oi9jr
    @DarkKnight-oi9jr 3 роки тому +15

    It's so sad seeing Javed Akhtar Sir getting old😭😭

  • @kavitakochar5985
    @kavitakochar5985 3 роки тому +22

    भारत माता का अपमान और नुकसान करने वाले आजकल भारत माता के जयकारे लगा कर अपने पाप छुपाते है।

    • @Rattannamste
      @Rattannamste 3 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/Vly2QuL1UBA/v-deo.html

  • @happy2help1947
    @happy2help1947 3 роки тому +2

    Very very real and relevant analysis. Thanks to news laundry.

  • @noorsyyed
    @noorsyyed 3 роки тому +10

    IIT and IIM was the idea and establishment of Maulana abdual kalam azad and of course nehru as he was PM

  • @Raj0520
    @Raj0520 3 роки тому +36

    With All his faultlines Nehru is still by far the greatest leader India has ever produced. The reason why nobody is close to him cause nobody else is even talked enough and or even relevant enough to talk about all their mistakes and faults. U can love him or Hate him but u can't ignore The Giant among Giants Pandit Nehru.
    Belive me I dont support Congress even a bit. I just want a better alternative for this nation.

    • @tgsaravind
      @tgsaravind 3 роки тому +4

      Nehru was and is still a giant. Undeniably.

    • @malaydeb2895
      @malaydeb2895 3 роки тому +3

      @Vijay Manjrekar Whatsapp university graduate spotted.

    • @ganeshbanerjee9841
      @ganeshbanerjee9841 3 роки тому +1

      @Vijay Manjrekar who told you ?
      Who kept Sheikh Muhammad Abdulla arrested for years together ?

    • @ganeshbanerjee9841
      @ganeshbanerjee9841 3 роки тому

      @Stallion Spirit what is liberandu ?

    • @ganeshbanerjee9841
      @ganeshbanerjee9841 3 роки тому

      @Stallion Spirit No. He was just a power seeker

  • @nabajyotiborah4505
    @nabajyotiborah4505 3 роки тому +3

    Very good informative discussion,

  • @pgupta24
    @pgupta24 3 роки тому +1

    Good, balanced discussion!

  • @hiteshdsouza9615
    @hiteshdsouza9615 3 роки тому +36

    By the time people realize who is right or wrong, it will be too late.

    • @himdude9637
      @himdude9637 3 роки тому +1

      @Stallion Spirit I agree with you

    • @ijeshwardhillon4927
      @ijeshwardhillon4927 3 роки тому +1

      MODI IS SO WRONNG

    • @himdude9637
      @himdude9637 3 роки тому +1

      @@ijeshwardhillon4927 no issue sikh and punjab don't vote for Modi or BJP. They vote for 1984 Congress

    • @amiyshrivastava4088
      @amiyshrivastava4088 3 роки тому

      @Stallion Spirit By then India will die as a Country.

    • @prashantandu
      @prashantandu 3 роки тому

      @Stallion Spirit absolutely 👍.... BTW....dono buddhe apni apni frustration nikal rahe hain😁

  • @ajmersingh4829
    @ajmersingh4829 3 роки тому +8

    भारत माता जैसी कुछ भी नहीं है। दर असल जो हिंदू वादी रूढ़ियों में विश्वास करता है वह भावनात्मक भाव को ज्यादा समझता और अपनाता है।

    • @tejtiwary4309
      @tejtiwary4309 3 роки тому

      Hum Bihariyon, Bangalion aur Marathiyon ka samooh nahi, balki Bharatiya hain. Bharat Mata hain Ajmer Ji. Yahi bhav yadi Lahaurion aur Ajmeriyon mein hota, to hum vibhajit nahin hote. Bharat Mata ki jai 🙏

  • @harshitkarir2071
    @harshitkarir2071 3 роки тому +4

    Yes yes ..... Man than you ..... Love javed akhtar ... Thankyou guys

  • @anandchitre6967
    @anandchitre6967 2 роки тому +11

    I think the reason why Pt. Nehru is targeted today is because the India, in current shape and form, is the manifestation of Nehru’s frame of thought, vision and ideas. Those extreme right wingers have fundamental problem with progressive Indian fundamentals. In order to counter the Indian thought process, it is important to ridicule the foundation of this thought process. So attack Nehru which will eventually result in demolition of modern Indian foundation.

  • @kulwindermann1991
    @kulwindermann1991 3 роки тому +4

    Good discussion

  • @politicalroaster7255
    @politicalroaster7255 3 роки тому +3

    Good debate between 2 genius 👌