AlphaZero's Attacking Chess

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 гру 2018
  • UPDATE: Hey folks! Thank you for your kind words about my AlphaZero videos! I don't have new AZ videos on this channel but I have created something even bigger: an entire chess course (Attack like a machine!) highly influenced by AlphaZero's play, with the main chapter dedicated to AlphaZero's attacking chess! You can check out the preview video and find out more about the course here: www.chessable.com/anna-1
    --------
    WATCH ME LIVE ► / anna_chess
    get my merch ► www.annachess.store
    follow me on twitter ► / anna_chess
    follow me on instagram ► / annarudolf_chess
    receive a discount on G Fuel with code ANNA ► gfuel.ly/2NfJWNo
    get my latest chess course ► www.chessable.com/anna-1
    --------
    Google's DeepMind has just released a new academic paper on AlphaZero -- the general purpose artificial intelligence system that mastered chess through self-play and went on to defeat the world champion of chess engines, Stockfish. In this video chess International Master Anna Rudolf takes a look at a never-before-seen game from a match played in January 2018, and discusses how the playing style and attacking chess of AlphaZero compare to computers and humans.
    The game I selected is part of the 20-game collection me and other chess broadcasters received before the release of the PGN.
    For more information on DeepMind and AlphaZero visit: www.deepmind.com
    Read the academic paper in the Science Magazine: science.sciencemag.org/content...
    The image in the thumbnail is courtesy of DeepMind.
    #annachess #alphazero #chess
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,9 тис.

  • @CosmoNautica22
    @CosmoNautica22 3 роки тому +1368

    Philidor: Pawns are the soul of chess.
    AlphaZero: What are all these tiny pieces doing in my way?!

    • @reloder1249
      @reloder1249 3 роки тому +30

      That made me laugh 🤣🤣

    • @ClaudioFloreani
      @ClaudioFloreani 3 роки тому +13

      😂🤣😂

    • @mitchellgraham7060
      @mitchellgraham7060 3 роки тому +24

      alpha zero makes worthy sacrifices, does necessary evils.

    • @mitchellgraham7060
      @mitchellgraham7060 3 роки тому +14

      alpha zero is all seeing, alpha zero is utopia

    • @jakubkahoun8383
      @jakubkahoun8383 3 роки тому +32

      When alpha zero started playing Starcraft, he literaly killed his units, to make room for another....everyone was little bit scared, imaging Alpha ledaing actual armies..

  • @ketzbook
    @ketzbook 4 роки тому +2038

    me: Haha, I'm a pawn up!
    AlphaZero: Pawns are worthless, earthling! You have already lost, mate in 29

    • @Digibullet32
      @Digibullet32 3 роки тому +7

      Jamesons...likes The Thing...cheating bitch

    • @regiszhou5065
      @regiszhou5065 3 роки тому +9

      Yeah... Sometimes you just have to sacrifice material just to open up your opponent's kingside. EVEN QUEENS!!!!

    • @F4mwp
      @F4mwp 3 роки тому +73

      AlphaZero: pawns are worthless, peasant. You merely adopted chess, I was born into it. Molded by it. How could it favor you.

    • @TheMadisonHang
      @TheMadisonHang 3 роки тому +2

      that's my greatest fear haha

    • @fxt3mc
      @fxt3mc 3 роки тому +2

      Lol

  • @007bistromath
    @007bistromath 4 роки тому +1375

    Normal chess: let me set up a fence with my pawns so I can develop my pieces
    A0: let me sweep all this trash out of the way so I can get to my desk

    • @evolveofwow
      @evolveofwow 4 роки тому +28

      Your comment made me actually laugh out loud. Thanks for that.

    • @ZoolGatekeeper
      @ZoolGatekeeper 4 роки тому +1

      Ok. The MacReady defence, that worked..(The Thing,1982)

    • @johnkevan550
      @johnkevan550 4 роки тому

      Hahaha, love it.

    • @alexc2259
      @alexc2259 3 роки тому

      Awesome haha.

    • @ollinebg
      @ollinebg 3 роки тому

      @@evolveofwow jajaja SAME

  • @MrFreddao
    @MrFreddao 3 роки тому +633

    When I see alpha zero playing, I realize that I'm just a chimpanze that can talk.

    • @abusufian4958
      @abusufian4958 3 роки тому +19

      yeah may be you are. But we humans aren't cause this alpha shit is made by us

    • @fehimgok3476
      @fehimgok3476 3 роки тому +18

      Chimpanzee with an inferior short-term memory.

    • @johnnyjohnny6174
      @johnnyjohnny6174 3 роки тому +24

      I don't see any proof that you can talk

    • @bartoszkonieczny3238
      @bartoszkonieczny3238 3 роки тому +1

      True, but I like this feeling.

    • @AthosJosue
      @AthosJosue 3 роки тому +6

      If make you feel better, alphazero is just a bunch of sand that can play chess.

  • @uvuvwevwevweonyentenyevweu9405
    @uvuvwevwevweonyentenyevweu9405 5 років тому +1845

    "And it was in this position that uh, Stockfish resigned the game"
    -Agadmator

    • @Scriabinfan593
      @Scriabinfan593 4 роки тому +142

      I read this in his accent lmaooo

    • @pascaljersier4141
      @pascaljersier4141 4 роки тому +18

      Osas this your name burst my head .finish !! hahahaa happy to see my fellow benin man quoting Agadmator

    • @reneernesto5748
      @reneernesto5748 4 роки тому +4

      @@Scriabinfan593 same haha

    • @lukehudson5064
      @lukehudson5064 4 роки тому +19

      And uh, this position is totally winning for white

    • @Football-oe4hl
      @Football-oe4hl 4 роки тому +1

      Call your name

  • @samuelintriago2478
    @samuelintriago2478 3 роки тому +538

    Alphazero in reality: "I have no idea of what I'm doing."

  • @travellingphysicist
    @travellingphysicist 3 роки тому +608

    Stockfish : I am the best chess engine
    AlphaZero : Hold my pawns...

    • @Direktorhkbergdahl
      @Direktorhkbergdahl 3 роки тому +43

      AlphaZero: You can keep them

    • @abdqs853
      @abdqs853 3 роки тому +8

      well A0 is not an engine. It's a Neural Network so SF is still the strongest engine

    • @anow2
      @anow2 3 роки тому +16

      @@abdqs853 "In computer chess, a chess engine is a computer program that analyzes chess or chess variant positions, and generates a move or list of moves that it regards as strongest. "
      Alpha Zero can do this, thus is a chess engine, among other things.

    • @HumbuStudio
      @HumbuStudio 3 роки тому +1

      HAHAHAHA ! You killed me xD

    • @billclancy4436
      @billclancy4436 3 роки тому +4

      @jyloup85 so it took Stockfish 12 attempts to get where Alpha got in zero?

  • @adikisrichakra
    @adikisrichakra 4 роки тому +192

    Stockfish analysis engine to stockfish : Why did you play that move ? Its a bad move.
    Stockfish : You are the one who played it.

  • @rizqiefajar
    @rizqiefajar 5 років тому +1422

    Phillidor : Pawns are the soul of chess
    AlphaZero : Let me just sacrifice all of my pawns

    • @rizqiefajar
      @rizqiefajar 5 років тому +30

      @schindler91589 Humans : (pikachu's meme face)

    • @Ceeewolf
      @Ceeewolf 5 років тому +29

      I guess you missed the significance of the White pawn on H7. Phillidor is still correct.

    • @slickwiz334
      @slickwiz334 5 років тому +44

      Alpha zero sacrifices the soul(pawns) for Absolute control and Complete Domination

    • @cpt.prolapsor5121
      @cpt.prolapsor5121 5 років тому +16

      @@Ceeewolf and you missed the joke...

    • @rizqiefajar
      @rizqiefajar 5 років тому +3

      @@Ceeewolf I was just joking ;)

  • @marcifeil3612
    @marcifeil3612 4 роки тому +254

    AlphaZero loves activity!
    *King B1*
    It also likes to keep it's opponent pinned!
    *King A1*

  • @Thor_Underdunk_Caballerial
    @Thor_Underdunk_Caballerial 3 роки тому +89

    AlphaZero: *King to B6*
    StockFish: "Understandable, have a nice day"

  • @MistThief
    @MistThief 4 роки тому +593

    Pieces: New chess master is in town. His name is AlphaZero.
    Pawns: *sweating profusely*

  • @Aynshtaynn
    @Aynshtaynn 5 років тому +346

    6:22 "AlphaZero, goes for the attack with a very strong...
    Kb1"
    That was hilarious!

    • @Aynshtaynn
      @Aynshtaynn 5 років тому +13

      @@dominicsellers1813 and very aggressive one

    • @norbertwiesner569
      @norbertwiesner569 4 роки тому

      Interesting is, my Stockfish 11 on a normal computer plays also 21. Kb1 (with the evaluation 0.00, so eval even that black ist 2 pawns up).

  • @TokyoTokyo-st6mp
    @TokyoTokyo-st6mp 3 роки тому +176

    I am not an English speaking person.Your English is very easy to hear.Your commentary was very polite and easy to understand.

    • @pushkardeshmukh2413
      @pushkardeshmukh2413 3 роки тому +20

      She is a retired Chess player, streamer, UA-camr, can speak Hungarian, Spanish, English. She is one of the bestsoft spoken person I have seen in my life. 😊
      Enjoy.

    • @weeblelehmann466
      @weeblelehmann466 3 роки тому +4

      I concur. I'm just starting out in chess and most videos are way too fast. These videos are perfect and you never get flustered, lol. A real joy to watch and listen to.

    • @blindcamel6236
      @blindcamel6236 2 роки тому

      e6, g7, h4, moves to A3 to sacrifice G6
      easy to understand if your a chess player but if your a normal person this ain't even english! god damn elitist chess douchbags 😂

    • @msislam6751
      @msislam6751 Рік тому

      I agree with you. I also think her English is easier to understand than others.I'm also a non English speaker

    • @invisiblelathatatlan
      @invisiblelathatatlan Рік тому +2

      It's called Hungarian accent. I always said that we speak much clearer English than the English.🤣

  • @crossnote3590
    @crossnote3590 4 роки тому +199

    Guess I'll chuck my 'chess theory' books written by mere finite mortals. LOL

    • @gergogaal568
      @gergogaal568 3 роки тому +7

      humans cant play like this, thats why they dont. they can improve theory by watching these games but will never play this calculated

    • @mcNuggetMuncher
      @mcNuggetMuncher Рік тому

      @@gergogaal568 I dont know about that. I think most players now and days rely too much on memorising defenceve stratagys and all the quick win moves amongst other things. Theres verry little originality in play style now and days.

    • @vvenkat111
      @vvenkat111 27 днів тому

      NO. Pls don't. Very few humans can convert a position that a program sees as "winning".

  • @miraculoushulumununum4020
    @miraculoushulumununum4020 3 роки тому +64

    AlphaZero: *my goals are beyond your understanding*

    • @Lee-jt4hz
      @Lee-jt4hz 3 роки тому +8

      me: *my goals are beyond my understanding*

  • @blubbfisch98
    @blubbfisch98 5 років тому +218

    > HAHA, you already blundered 25% of your pieces!
    > I did? Well, time to win.
    > What?

    • @luizquevedo6580
      @luizquevedo6580 3 роки тому +2

      Jotaro: By now, I have finally learned to play the game.

    • @gcg8187
      @gcg8187 3 роки тому

      @@luizquevedo6580 hahahah

  • @AntonyMBenedict
    @AntonyMBenedict 5 років тому +722

    AlphaZero trolling Stockfish, sacrificing 3 pawns and playing a prophylactic move.
    Stockfish: Am I a joke to you?

    • @pedestrian2530
      @pedestrian2530 5 років тому +73

      He is a fish

    • @budesmatpicu3992
      @budesmatpicu3992 5 років тому +13

      yep, easy to do DeepTroll when you can see few moves more than your oponent

    • @eduuriosguerrero3781
      @eduuriosguerrero3781 5 років тому +6

      Your analisys is excellent!!

    • @mesielepush2124
      @mesielepush2124 5 років тому +39

      Stockfish: Give up the Knight.
      ALphaZero: Rg1
      Stockfish: ** Surprised Pikachu face **

    • @Nikolay_Nikolaev
      @Nikolay_Nikolaev 5 років тому +12

      I think this is the wrong game, because it violates all the foundations of chess, I think we must sue the creators of AZ0

  • @smackastan5697
    @smackastan5697 3 роки тому +31

    It looks like AlphaZero's idea was to trap their higher level pieces even if it means sacrificing a pawn. It effectively took their pieces since they weren't able to move.

  • @ivoplsek
    @ivoplsek 4 роки тому +105

    This was one of the most entertaining and interesting video I've watched recently ...Anna, you rock! Thank you.

    • @spudwesth
      @spudwesth 4 роки тому

      Hot babe

    • @couchpotatoe91
      @couchpotatoe91 4 роки тому +18

      Under every wholesome comment lurks a creepy one. One truly has to admire the tough skin women on the internet need to have.

  • @MrDeathyness
    @MrDeathyness 5 років тому +123

    Humans: I can make a queen with a pawn
    AlphaZero: pawns get in the way of my queen

    • @vvenkat111
      @vvenkat111 4 роки тому +3

      so typical of humans....trying to find water on Mars wasting a billion dollars in the process while being disrespectful of the abundant water sources on earth. Typical of humans.

    • @v44n7
      @v44n7 4 роки тому +1

      @@vvenkat111 the reason to find water on mars Is to use it later on In conolies In mars, no to bring it to earth. And yes, earth is a paradise, but our chances of extintion are pretty high, if we colonize mars. those chances goes to 0

    • @thoughtsofapeer
      @thoughtsofapeer 4 роки тому +1

      @@v44n7 0 is a little low i think

    • @thoughtsofapeer
      @thoughtsofapeer 4 роки тому +6

      Pretty sure our chances of extinction is exactly 1 no matter what we do

    • @vvenkat111
      @vvenkat111 4 роки тому

      @@thoughtsofapeer extinction looking a distinct possibility with covid panda (;-)) Our death is made in China too ;-)

  • @Babakc
    @Babakc 4 роки тому +1530

    Damn she has a crush on Alphazero.

    • @kaasmaster8892
      @kaasmaster8892 4 роки тому +47

      so do i

    • @abhatt270
      @abhatt270 4 роки тому +68

      Who doesn't?

    • @Hollylivengood
      @Hollylivengood 4 роки тому +58

      I know a bunch of people who talk about Alpha Zero like he's their favorite high school crush.

    • @michaelfortunato1860
      @michaelfortunato1860 4 роки тому +77

      And the rest of the world on Anna.

    • @evad7933
      @evad7933 4 роки тому +22

      @@michaelfortunato1860 You took the words out of my mind.:)

  • @Asssosasoterora
    @Asssosasoterora 3 роки тому +6

    Alpha Zero has such a beautifil playing style. Being able to evaluate a position advantage over a material advantage.

  • @gspaulsson
    @gspaulsson 3 роки тому +13

    Starts like Morphy, grinds it out like Magnus. Stockfish calculates; AlphaZero learns from experience, like a human. Who said that romantic chess is dead?

    • @sarenace
      @sarenace 3 роки тому +1

      Oh god so true. All through the game im thinking "just like Morphy". A0 is the pride and pride of chess.

  • @andrewxc1335
    @andrewxc1335 5 років тому +636

    It’s like watching a SWAT team storming a medieval castle...

    • @fightingforcatalonia
      @fightingforcatalonia 4 роки тому +9

      underrated comment bro! Nice to meet you

    • @QRius-ce8qx
      @QRius-ce8qx 4 роки тому +2

      Damm that's exactly what i thought...

    • @alexobed3184
      @alexobed3184 4 роки тому +4

      yeah, but hella slowly.

    • @LeonardoBacchi
      @LeonardoBacchi 3 роки тому +2

      Perfect metaphore! 😆🤘💀🔥

    • @WarAgainstCruelty22
      @WarAgainstCruelty22 3 роки тому +4

      If ur funding the enslavement and slaughter of animals, you are an animal abuser

  • @kieranmartin6030
    @kieranmartin6030 5 років тому +1000

    You can beat AlphaZero if you pour beer over it's circuit boards.

    • @sandeepshetty1589
      @sandeepshetty1589 4 роки тому +89

      not going to work ...it will just sacrifice it and win

    • @singingintherain4750
      @singingintherain4750 4 роки тому +34

      Counts for humans too :P

    • @scoobydoobydoooo
      @scoobydoobydoooo 4 роки тому +20

      "Cheating bitch..."

    • @marsovac
      @marsovac 4 роки тому +8

      This works for humans as well. We are immune to non-alcoholic beer tough while he isn't.

    • @gmsi7d371
      @gmsi7d371 4 роки тому +4

      just unplug the damn machine and you will win

  • @marcelthiel1
    @marcelthiel1 3 роки тому +11

    It's 2021. Me, analyzing this game with the Lichess Stockfish: All moves that AlphaZero played are the first recommend moves of Stockfish.

    • @ChidiGaming
      @ChidiGaming 2 роки тому

      You really did that??

    • @travelroammate7018
      @travelroammate7018 2 роки тому

      Nice😂 guess somebody learned from his mistakes

    • @Mehpew
      @Mehpew 2 роки тому

      Stockfish learns from played games, unlike Alphazero. After this game is in the database it'll remember the better moves

  • @todorkolev7565
    @todorkolev7565 4 роки тому +66

    Another way a0 wins over SF: We already know it likes mobility - and this is a huge advantage over SF-type engines. They don't do well with mobility because it increases their depth exponentially. a0 has basically learned to "stretch" SF and use its brute-force calculations against it :D

    • @todorkolev7565
      @todorkolev7565 3 роки тому

      @@Duduvianna3 interesting. To be honest, when writing this, I was thinking about the kind of opponent used to train a0, which would have been anyway a traditional style (dare I say "brute force with strategy" calculator), of the same type as StockFish.
      So, maybe not StockFish itself but an opponent that plays the same?

    • @michaelsonnert7790
      @michaelsonnert7790 3 роки тому +5

      Eduardo Vianna what I think is really interesting is that in the learning process there are multiple Ai instances of a0 playing each other at the same time. And there is this phenomenon that in certain badges of AIs that play each other certain metagames form where one of the AIs learns to prefer a strategy that is strong against what the other AIs in their badge plays and strongly overvalues that strategy because it wins so much with it. So the fact that A0 tries to learn to play on its opponents weaknesses has to be and is controlled for in order to make A0 learn the games instead of learning to play its oppenents.

    • @michaelsonnert7790
      @michaelsonnert7790 3 роки тому +2

      Eduardo Vianna Eduardo Vianna no, from my understanding it‘s not that easy. just trusting that the natural probabilistic distribution let‘s THE strongest strategy come out on top would create loops and hinder learning.
      ua-cam.com/video/eZCI7zu_DlM/v-deo.html
      check out this video from the 25:50 minute mark. It’s about the deepmind AI for Starcraft, but I am pretty sure this problem occurs in every highly complex game. The problem is that every strategy depends on what your opponent does and there are many different possibilities to act. That means that there is the problem that some sort of rock paper scissors situation developing, where strategy 2 beats strategy 1 and most instances start playing strategy 2 until strategy 3 gets discovered that wins against strategy 2 but loses against strategy 1. To prevent that the instances get caught up in a loop with no real learning progress, that cycle is disrupted by introducing instances that play a certain way every time and don‘t evolve in order to make a0 remember that it has to be able to beat those strategies as well even though they are not as popular within the other a0 instances.
      I agree with the second point. The learning happens within a* itself, although games at the top level are used to initialize the instances. They are basically used as some kind of starting point for the ais to develop from.

    • @michaelsonnert7790
      @michaelsonnert7790 3 роки тому

      Eduardo Vianna mind to share the link?

    • @michaelsonnert7790
      @michaelsonnert7790 3 роки тому +1

      Eduardo Vianna Eduardo Vianna the paper you linked does not go deep enough into the process of how deepmind implemented the self-learning in a0. Moreover it refers to the algorithms implemented by Ago0 unless stated otherwise.
      hackernoon.com/the-3-tricks-that-made-alphago-zero-work-f3d47b6686ef
      This blockpost about Ago0 however specifically mentions multi-task learning with hard parameter sharing, which is pretty much what I mentioned above. On the deepmind website, there are also papers that deal with exactly this topic so I am still not sure where you take your confidence from that this common problem in ai self learning suddenly was not relevant for a0?
      And yes, they did not use external agents to overcome the problem I mentioned, but that is also not what I said. I said they used external games by top players to initialize their agents which is mentioned in the beginning of the video I linked.

  • @chandlertheeditor2404
    @chandlertheeditor2404 4 роки тому +269

    Alpha Zero's entire strategy is to strangle his opponents by ruining any possible development.

  • @jordanfox6555
    @jordanfox6555 5 років тому +172

    This is absolutely savage, alpha zero is toying with stockfish like a well trained dog owner offering it delicious pawns for it to play passive

    • @Dunkelelf3
      @Dunkelelf3 4 роки тому +32

      yeah that's what i also find so interesting about these leela zero and alpha zero vs engine games.. this friggin ai's play these engines like a gm an amateur.. the engine is trapped in its own position with no way of getting pieces into the game.. they don't care about any chess principles and somehow gain advantage due to some seemingly weird and pointless move and then bam 35 moves later they are getting the upper hand because of this.. the positional game of these ai's is so incredible.. and then you realize this is fucking stockfish they play against.. an engine so strong it plays every human like a fiddle with ease.. an engine you will never win a game against within your lifetime if you play against the strongest version..

    • @charimuvilla8693
      @charimuvilla8693 4 роки тому +25

      To win in chess you need to checkmate the enemy king. The fact that we value the other pieces is just an assumption we made. AI engines don't make those assumptions.

    • @Honeysucklebommie
      @Honeysucklebommie 4 роки тому

      @@charimuvilla8693 Or has it assumed that the opposition will do or has been programmed to do exactly that and then plays that knowledge back against it?

    • @charimuvilla8693
      @charimuvilla8693 4 роки тому

      @@Honeysucklebommie It should be possible to train an "anti-stochfish" AI but after seeing how positionally alpha plays I don't think that's the case.

    • @siquod
      @siquod 4 роки тому +3

      All after being shown the rules for the first time just four hours ago.

  • @squirrelgray945
    @squirrelgray945 3 роки тому +2

    Very good descriptions. A lot of chess videos I don't feel like it's improving my game but the way you pause for a moment and ask what should be done at this point then explain out the possibilities really helps.

  • @facingmydragons
    @facingmydragons 4 роки тому +1

    Köszönöm Anna, hogy ezt a valóban meglepő játszmát ilyen szépen prezentálta. Öröm volt nézni és hallani, hogy egy ember mennyire másképpen gondolkodik mint egy gép; mert hiszen bennünk számos pszichológiai tényező dolgozik, amik a döntéseink szerves részét képezik. Az egyén pszichológiai alkata és a személyisége a szűrő amin kereszül egy helyzetet megítél - még a sakkban is. Ezt egy neurális hálózat, mint AlphaZero nem tudja, de Stockfish8-ban benne van az emberi gondolkodás lenyomata. Nagyon érdekes volt. Köszönöm! :)

  • @TakesTwoToTango
    @TakesTwoToTango 5 років тому +352

    Always play Kb1.
    Alphazero was secretly trained by watching all of Ben Finegold's lectures.

  • @PeterTench
    @PeterTench 5 років тому +149

    Ex chess player, loved the analysis and how accessible you made it. Nice job. Subscribed :)

    • @chumbucket6989
      @chumbucket6989 4 роки тому +24

      Peter Tench congratulations on your sobriety

    • @LOLzum101
      @LOLzum101 3 роки тому +2

      You never stop being a chess player it's like riding a bike. You just take a break from it

    • @joannathompson9778
      @joannathompson9778 3 роки тому +2

      Insane. It was literally watching black squirm around until it felt it was the right moment to attack. This goes against everything I have ever learned about tempo.

  • @jason5781
    @jason5781 3 роки тому +7

    You described this game so charmingly. It almost felt like a bed time story.

    • @XpVersusVista
      @XpVersusVista Рік тому

      literally watching this while lying in bed to sleep xD she's so soft spoken, it's really nice to listen to her.

  • @Ken.-
    @Ken.- 4 роки тому +7

    Probably my most favorite chess video I've ever seen. Just the enthusiasm alone.
    22:10 I feel like the knight to d7 just hurts that bishop even more with its zero mobility, and Qc1 was typical AlphaZero protecting the c5 square, further imposing difficulties onto black.
    Clearly AlphaZero is just pure evil with its idc about giving you even a hint of a chance.

  • @Legominder
    @Legominder 5 років тому +252

    Amazing explanation showing how much can we learn if we free our minds from rules we take for granted🤗

    • @Vahe345
      @Vahe345 5 років тому +11

      it's like the matrix when morpheus talks to neo in combat training

    • @Person01234
      @Person01234 4 роки тому +4

      @One Blue Boi Building a nuke isn't actually that complicated, getting the materials is the hard part.

    • @jeffgreen3376
      @jeffgreen3376 4 роки тому

      It shows how much a computer can learn. Not we.

    • @Person01234
      @Person01234 4 роки тому +2

      @Nathan Sindlinger No, it's not. Neither design for basic fission devices it particularly hard to understand. It *may* be going a bit far to say you could build it in your basement but with the right person I'm sure it's doable. The problem is that the best way to get enriched uranium or plutonium is as byproducts of nuclear fission and building a controlled nuclear reactor is a much more complicated process. I'm not aware of marketplaces where the general public can just buy lumps of barely subcritical weapons grade uranium and plutonium, but if they exist I will stand corrected.

    • @MrPINKFL0YD
      @MrPINKFL0YD 3 роки тому

      Should be careful. One company is setting out to ruin backgammon with the AI info. They deduct blunders from the score and say winning the game is not enough?! 😂 That's going too far when the whole point is to win the game

  • @billblakney2590
    @billblakney2590 5 років тому +64

    As an amateur player (rather poor at that) who is interested in AlpahZero and the recently publicized competition, I've got to say that Anna made a great selection of a game to analyze, and just brought a lot of insight and excitement to it. This should go down as a classic video. Way to go, and thanks, Anna!

  • @katalysis
    @katalysis 4 роки тому +3

    This is an amazing coverage and walkthrough of this game. I hope to see more content like this from you in the future. You have a talent in explaining high level chess in a very engaging way.

  • @TheJacklikesvideos
    @TheJacklikesvideos 3 роки тому +2

    that was thrilling. a good sign of a good teacher is that they are enthusiastic about what they teach. it is really engaging and gets the student excited about the material also.

  • @wesleydemarco6012
    @wesleydemarco6012 5 років тому +147

    I think its interesting that AlphaZero uses known openings that noone programmed it with.
    Says a lot for book, but you also notice AlphaZero changes those openings pretty quickly too.
    this is absolutely fascinating. Anna thank you for your commentary on the game. I'm not an
    exceptionally good chess player so Its nice to have a professional player's interpretation of the
    moves.

    • @Luredreier
      @Luredreier 5 років тому +24

      +@c b Let's just agree to dissagree on that one.
      Human games are interesting exactly *because* of our flaws.

    • @solomonlubega8337
      @solomonlubega8337 5 років тому +1

      Alpha Zero is improving them but there is no proper explanation for the novelties

    • @Luredreier
      @Luredreier 5 років тому +3

      +@c b My point is that it makes sense because when a human wins we win *despite* our flaws achieving greatness.
      How good a computer performs is completely and utterly irrelevant to how much chess players should be paid.
      A human can inspire other humans as we can emulate them and achieve the same things as they can.
      You can never become a machine however.
      At least not with current technology.
      Your comment don't make sense in my mind till human-computer interfaces reaches a point where we can freely transfer our minds too and from a computer and fully utilize a computer wirelessly with our mind.
      And even then chess might be interesting with such a interface turned off and played with our regular flawed pieces of meat.

    • @Luredreier
      @Luredreier 5 років тому +3

      +@@solomonlubega8337 Several of the novelities makes sense to at least *some* humans looking at the games.
      We're going to see more players emulate the best parts of AI play and traditional engines slowly adopt more and more of those into their code base till they reach parity.

    • @Ben9362
      @Ben9362 5 років тому

      @@Luredreier So you think the engines can fight back ... from this? Bring it on!

  • @emersonloureiro
    @emersonloureiro 5 років тому +31

    Having watched so many video commentaries of the AlphaZero vs Stockfish series, yours is by far the most illuminating and easy to understand one. I'd love to see more of those from you, for sure. Keep that up.

  • @markonikolic1386
    @markonikolic1386 3 роки тому +2

    Oh the passion! A haven't seen ANYONE talk about chess like this! One can see in your eyes that you love the game and new discoveries it offers. This was really enlightening, even for someone who plays chess as a fun afternoon brain exercise. I caught your stream the other day and loved your way of teaching a friend to play chess. Keep up the good work and keep loving the game!

  • @radicalrick9587
    @radicalrick9587 3 роки тому +3

    Gosh, I love your assessment of this game.
    It reminds of Bobby Fisher, he always did things that no one could understand.
    In fact in a tournament one time, he moved his knight into a position that everyone(chess experts), in the chess community watching the game live, gasp, called it a huge blunder.
    The chess experts explained how it has weakened his position, etc..
    Then 9-12 move later the game was over Fischer destroyed his opponent with that knight move.
    Fischer too was superhuman.

    • @tudorm6838
      @tudorm6838 3 роки тому +1

      A game with Portisch has a such story.

    • @tudorm6838
      @tudorm6838 3 роки тому +1

      Fischer 20-0 sequence with players from top 15 cannot be measured with Elo. His last three years were 100+30=8- with top players while playing reckless to win with a no draw mentality.

  • @mysidianbard5890
    @mysidianbard5890 4 роки тому +36

    She seems so sincerely excited about this, it's adorable!

  • @g.karetnikov4717
    @g.karetnikov4717 5 років тому +440

    In some years AI will play the Human Gambit!

  • @AnnaRudolfChess
    @AnnaRudolfChess  4 роки тому +196

    UPDATE: Hey folks! Thank you for your kind words about my AlphaZero videos! I don't have new AZ videos on this channel but I have created something even bigger: an entire chess course (Attack like a machine!) highly influenced by AlphaZero's play, with the main chapter dedicated to AlphaZero's attacking chess. You can check out the preview video and find out more about the course here: www.chessable.com/anna-1
    *Also: it's an "it", I know I was wrong to correct myself and apologise often. You can check out in the rest of the AlphaZero videos if I had learned from it: ua-cam.com/video/rkt51PTCQG4/v-deo.html

    • @CyanBlackflower
      @CyanBlackflower 4 роки тому +6

      HEY!! Thank You!! I find the A.I. games very fascinating! I just watched the "AlphaGo" movie, and while I do not know the game "Go" very well, I DO know chess quite well. The thing for me is that I realise the machine has several advantages over the human brain in terms of speed, and THOROUGHNESS of analysis, processing, and calculation. This ultimately places the Gen.A.I. in a whole different class. This is why I fail to understand WHY some people actually get upset and or offended by the powers of the machine when they are defeated "IT". BTW Why are YOU struggling with the irrelevant gender of "IT"??? It is an IT, gender has NO Meaning here!!! LOL!! Anyway, I enjoyed this video. Thank you again. Oh BTW, do you know how I might obtain a good chess program for my P.C.? Free or pay no matter.

    • @lawrencekwon4849
      @lawrencekwon4849 3 роки тому +1

      Maybe we should stop using words like "sacrifice" as a descriptor. A move is a move is a move. Nothing more.

    • @lawrencekwon4849
      @lawrencekwon4849 3 роки тому +3

      Do not apologize for calling AZ "he." However, it would have been way more badass if you called AZ a "she".

    • @mikestock969
      @mikestock969 3 роки тому +1

      I am very impressed with Alpha Zero's performance at the chess board!!
      Thank you for sharing.😄

    • @TheLeopard2A6
      @TheLeopard2A6 3 роки тому +2

      @@CyanBlackflower Chessmaster9000? If u like older chess games..♛..Black queen is white though..😒))

  • @jblglw
    @jblglw 4 роки тому +1

    Great video, Anna. I loved all your comments, they really highlighted and brought to life the ideas and approach AZ had in this wonderful game. (Side note: Looking good, Anna!).

  • @chorthithian
    @chorthithian 5 років тому +305

    I love her analysis, but I also love her voice. It's super soothing!

    • @pinkopalinko1233
      @pinkopalinko1233 5 років тому +17

      I love her sexy smile, her brain, her everything !!... ;-)

    • @valentinloew
      @valentinloew 5 років тому +4

      most awesome chess voice since yasser seirawan !! ^^

    • @jackriver1999
      @jackriver1999 5 років тому +10

      her voice is feminine, sweet, innocent and persuasive. it is very soothing, she could put a baby to sleep by whispering lullabies in their ears.

    • @valentinloew
      @valentinloew 5 років тому

      @@jackriver1999 well said !

    • @emporerwang5149
      @emporerwang5149 5 років тому +1

      Deffo, I'd like a nosh as well!

  • @optionwinner3883
    @optionwinner3883 4 роки тому +40

    Chess Guru: Remember Pawns are the heart of the game...
    Alpha zero: IF pawns are the heart then let the brain ( other pieces) win!!!!!!!!!

  • @abambhanie4203
    @abambhanie4203 4 роки тому +14

    alpha zero: "these pawns are restricting my inner beast!"

    • @fabiandaja6137
      @fabiandaja6137 3 роки тому

      🤣😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
      Why was this so funny
      Lmaooo

  • @lucacorona6681
    @lucacorona6681 3 роки тому

    Wow...loved the way you explained the game, veeery talented chess player and teacher. I'm subscribing RIGHT NOW!
    Can't wait to see more your videos!

  • @LuchiBonfico
    @LuchiBonfico 5 років тому +281

    Please cover more games of AlphaZero

    • @matta5498
      @matta5498 5 років тому +4

      Yes, it was sublime.

    • @johngordon4293
      @johngordon4293 5 років тому +1

      amazing restraint

    • @CandidDate
      @CandidDate 5 років тому +3

      thanks for the explaintionment

    • @theUroshman
      @theUroshman 5 років тому +4

      @@CandidDate Explanation is the right word, not explaintionment (that word doesn't exist)!

    • @dkkoonlah8591
      @dkkoonlah8591 5 років тому

      @@theUroshman haha

  • @timsullivan4566
    @timsullivan4566 5 років тому +26

    I have NEVER so thoroughly enjoyed a chess vid. Thank you, Anna for your charming, entertaining and enthusiastic commentary

  • @xshortguy
    @xshortguy 3 роки тому +15

    Yeah, my moves were pawn sacrifices. I'm just like AlphaZero! _>

  • @Smakenzi
    @Smakenzi 4 роки тому +1

    I think it actually assigns a value to pieces in some way, indirectly - as a function of the board position. It's a neural net, it crunches numbers under the hood

  • @Clearlight201
    @Clearlight201 5 років тому +16

    21:45 great summary of Alpha's strategy. Excellent explanation and analysis, very enjoyable thank you!

  • @tonyb9735
    @tonyb9735 5 років тому +8

    Thank you Anna for this analysis, you explained the game and its nuances perfectly but, you know, many chess analysts can also do that, what you managed to do that was unique for me was to also convey the excitement of the game.
    I found myself smiling along with your enthusiastic presentation and sharing your sense of admiration for AlphaZero's audacity. I liked the way that you anthropomorphize AlphaZero, it is clear that you see him as a bold, dashing hero and you made me see him that way too. Wonderful.

  • @marcovillar364
    @marcovillar364 3 роки тому +2

    Oh my God! This is just mind blowing. Thank you so much for your detail explanation of this beautiful game. It is such an illustrative game for me that shows how we humans developed our own rules of chess based on our own weaknesses, mostly our limited ability of doing deep and precise calculations which keeps us away from playing what we consider risky movements like loosing a lot of material. As you said AlphaZero looks so confident entering in this terrain knowing that just improving and opening the position increase the odds of winning in the long term. It feels like we’re witnessing the God of mathematics playing chess for the firs time. Just amazing.

    • @joshs7160
      @joshs7160 3 роки тому +2

      Just so you're aware, the newest chess engines, including Stockfish 12, would wipe the floor with AlphaZero, but that doesn't take away from the incredible achievement of AZ, and the amount of data that chess engine developers were able to take away from what AZ accomplished, and used it to strengthen their own chess engines. Of course, AZ was never a chess engine, and has not made any attempts to keep up in that department, it was simply a stepping stone for them in the grand scheme of machine learning.

    • @marcovillar364
      @marcovillar364 3 роки тому

      @@joshs7160 thanks for your reply, I totally agree Stockfish and chess engines are in general extraordinary human achievements, and now Stockfish is also partly an AlphaZero achievement. We’re clearly walking into a completely new era not only for chess but for science overall.

  • @unreactive
    @unreactive 3 роки тому +7

    13:35 2 years later and Stockfish now recommends d5 as the best move in this position!

    • @sethlook1010
      @sethlook1010 3 роки тому +2

      Can’t believe it took him two years to find out :(

  • @trrn13p
    @trrn13p 5 років тому +85

    Please do more AlphaZero analasys. Great video!

  • @jonnamechange6854
    @jonnamechange6854 5 років тому +1023

    AI will improve the world by sacrificing the humans.

    • @kennyg1358
      @kennyg1358 5 років тому +57

      Only half joking.

    • @albinorhino6
      @albinorhino6 5 років тому +21

      Hopefully it sacrifices you first....or maybe you could be the final one sacrificed, so you get a front row seat to the extermination of half your species.

    • @MrDeathyness
      @MrDeathyness 5 років тому +11

      Sacrifice the tall pawns

    • @jonnamechange6854
      @jonnamechange6854 5 років тому +11

      How would you know I am human?

    • @petros_adamopoulos
      @petros_adamopoulos 5 років тому +9

      @@albinorhino6 You're just a specist.

  • @johnnygoode2670
    @johnnygoode2670 4 роки тому +1

    Satisfactorily & interestingly instructive a tactical & gambit presentation. Please feel free to post more of those AlphaZero chess games' beneficial video demonstrations.

  • @graysalmon5650
    @graysalmon5650 3 роки тому +1

    Greetings from Ecuador. Loved the explanation and even though I am new to chess, the way you presented the game made it understandable. You gained a new subscription. Keep up the great work.

  • @corymcclure6062
    @corymcclure6062 5 років тому +10

    Great job with this, Anna. Just wonderful explanation and enthusiasm with the “patient attack.” Helps my son and I so much. Kudos.

  • @BeerdyBruceLeeCentral
    @BeerdyBruceLeeCentral 5 років тому +89

    Cool channel and very good analysis.

  • @ss9392
    @ss9392 3 роки тому

    Loved these analysis videos Anna, hope you would return to do some more of these sometime in future again : D

  • @jonnygoodguy4150
    @jonnygoodguy4150 3 роки тому +1

    That was fun to watch. Your commentary was mesmerizing. And you never asked for compensation. I'm so grateful for this lesson. Thank you.

  • @mastrake
    @mastrake 5 років тому +13

    Dear Anna - thank you for covering this game although AZ makes my head spin! I do love your commentary and please cover more of these.

  • @charlesgoldbach659
    @charlesgoldbach659 5 років тому +36

    i always thought her voice was computer generated

  • @nickcellino1503
    @nickcellino1503 4 роки тому

    Anna, this may be the best chess video I have ever seen. You selected a shocking game with numerous surprise moves and presented it with wonderful insight and charm. Of course, I'm subscribing!

  • @erijerij214
    @erijerij214 3 роки тому +6

    Her voice makes me feel like Im listening to a bedtime story lol

  • @scottg.6668
    @scottg.6668 5 років тому +57

    I rarely see commentary on games, but I've definitely been quite impressed with AlphaZero so thought I'd check this out. Your presentation was enchanting and I have a feeling that you're on the money about why AlphaZero does so much better than Stockfish- it is unhampered by human theories on how to play the game to win or at least draw. I imagine it has come up with its own set of theories on how to go about winning/at least drawing, theories that have far surpassed the human theories that are essentially tying Stockfish down to a lower bar.

    • @James-nr9gm
      @James-nr9gm 5 років тому +7

      Rather than "theories," AlphaZero has *intuition* built up by trying things repeatedly, and recording what did and did not work. It does not attempt to distill this into a rule set you could explain or communicate - it just "knows" what to do. Here's a summary article (though it would be nice if they described the "policy network" in part 2): www.chess.com/article/view/how-does-alphazero-play-chess

    • @scottg.6668
      @scottg.6668 5 років тому

      @@James-nr9gm Good article, thanks. I believe I read the second part, but not sure I read that first one.

    • @kenbrown438
      @kenbrown438 3 роки тому +1

      I agree !!!!

  • @cesargil5997
    @cesargil5997 5 років тому +4

    Awesome commentary! We can hear the passion. I've bookmarked this video.

  • @jonathanhart8730
    @jonathanhart8730 3 роки тому +1

    This was an excellent analysis, and I really appreciated your point on AlphaZero being a fresh perspective in an age-old game! Thank you for the splendid content!

  • @justind9858
    @justind9858 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks Anna. of course we'd like you to cover more games - so informative, educational and well presented.

  • @QazwerDave
    @QazwerDave 5 років тому +6

    22:20
    Queen also defends pawn on C5 from there !!

  • @MasterArt7
    @MasterArt7 5 років тому +53

    Insane. It was literally watching black squirm around until it felt it was the right moment to attack. This goes against everything I have ever learned about tempo.

    • @jessiejanson1528
      @jessiejanson1528 4 роки тому +27

      This is late... but its playing chess like it plays Go. its moves are designed to increase its potential to win if it plays perfectly, if it can increase its odds of winning by giving up pieces, it will since greater odds of winning is better then pieces. as people can see, it reduces the moves available to its opponent in any way possible, increasing its odds of winning, eventually as it plays out this results in the enemy having no place to move, or essentially 'checking' as many of their pieces as possible, which is sort of the point of the game. After seeing it play just this one game, its quite clear that its the correct/best way to play, but also the most difficult as its literally playing on a tightrope, if it were to screw up and allow pieces to escape, it could ruin its pin and result in a loss. its like playing with absolute confidence that you wont lose with every move you play, monitoring more pieces then seems to be humanly possible. It would be interesting to see alpha zero play halfway through the game if a human screwed up its game by moving a piece badly, what would alpha zero do? would it be able to recover?

    • @jothello9162
      @jothello9162 3 роки тому +5

      @@jessiejanson1528 It's just incredible that moves like Kb1, throwing away all the extra time/tempo it had gained, where actually the most optimal moves it could've made. It's like it's some kind of sadist that just likes watching the opponent miserably fail to activate their pieces.

    • @Pohlolol
      @Pohlolol 3 роки тому +1

      you can not compare an A.I. to a human player. humans are bound to make mistakes along the countless calculations of possibilities opening up. so it is advisable to use advantages and exchange pieces since you will mess your advantage up by overlooking some detail at some point.
      you can play like alphago zero if your game is without mistakes, flawless. but it isn't since you're human after all. try to play that way and get shattered.

  • @davidharmer9398
    @davidharmer9398 4 роки тому +1

    Anna Rudolf is inspiring.
    I'm not great at chess, but she explained the principles of AZ's play in a way that makes me want to try this for myself.

  • @penniesshillings
    @penniesshillings 4 роки тому

    I really enjoyed your clean and thorough evaluation of the game. Your commentary is excellent and I am now a subscriber. Thank you.

  • @mikeg9b
    @mikeg9b 5 років тому +16

    I don't even play chess (or any other games), but I was captivated for the first 30 minutes of this video.

  • @megamindblue1732
    @megamindblue1732 5 років тому +71

    I'm a 1000 rated player but I've watched a lot of games from the best GM's but this brought tears to my eyes.

    • @manit77
      @manit77 5 років тому +4

      Megamind Blue how many hours have you wasted?

    • @megamindblue1732
      @megamindblue1732 5 років тому +2

      @@manit77 Prolly 100+

    • @ausar3852
      @ausar3852 5 років тому +11

      lts not waste if he learns something from it ignorant kid

    • @megamindblue1732
      @megamindblue1732 5 років тому +3

      @@ausar3852 I've been watching such videos forever but I never seem to learn.🙁

    • @aaromal_rs
      @aaromal_rs 5 років тому +9

      @@megamindblue1732 True. Videos are a form of passive learning, hence learning with a book and board along with many pauses in the between to check the position out for yourself is the best way to study. Do not waste your time watching videos.

  • @philpeko1796
    @philpeko1796 4 роки тому +1

    @ Anna : Congratulations for your explanation and presentation skills, thanks for the expert analysis. A real pleasure, subscribed.

  • @charimuvilla8693
    @charimuvilla8693 4 роки тому +1

    I understand your excitement. All those years we have made several assumptions like "more pieces is a good thing" or "rook if better than bishop" and it's good to see an AI ignore those rules and play in a purely strategic way without assumptions made by humans.

  • @DaarkMana
    @DaarkMana 5 років тому +3

    Great analysis and narration Anna!

  • @mmartel
    @mmartel 5 років тому +81

    I loved your analysis of this fascinating game, Anna. So many "alien intelligence" ideas at work here - the novelty (ideas Stockfish doesn't see) and depth of strategic play is spellbinding. Although humans cannot play like Stockfish, I do wonder if humans *could* learn to play like AlphaZero if we could learn the same deep strategic principles and positional logic.

    • @AnnaRudolfChess
      @AnnaRudolfChess  5 років тому +18

      Great point, Mark! I think we can and should learn from the AlphaZero way of seeing chess!

    • @chrisiver8506
      @chrisiver8506 5 років тому +5

      A0 to me is like a human GM that played chess for thousands of years and has gotten to the 3600 level. Of course it just played against itself for 8 hours to get to this level lol

    • @BitcoinIsGoingToZero
      @BitcoinIsGoingToZero 5 років тому

      @@AnnaRudolfChess its more likely to learn to play like A0 than SF. A0 was modelled after human brains, after all.

    • @MrAgmoore
      @MrAgmoore 5 років тому

      I wonder if the human concept of a value system assigned to chess pieces is a result of capitalism ( everything on the planet is a commodity and has a value based on utility & scarcity ). Therefore humans have a flawed understanding of the game of chess by virtue of the economic system that we live under. I have an exciting idea... in Russia they start chess training around age 5 or something? For the next generation of chess players, remove the concept of a value system from the lesson and we can have some crazy chess games.

    • @chrisiver8506
      @chrisiver8506 5 років тому +2

      @@MrAgmoore All economic systems are value systems, thats what economic means. The value of pieces changes depending on the position. Alpha zero assigns values at a much higher level then the general principles we teach beginners. You talk like adding values to pieces is bad for the game, when thats literally how A0 learned. The values you're thinking of are just general basic principles to help out beginners. Economics has nothing to do with it wtf is wrong with you.
      Try teaching a 5 yr old how to play the game without telling them that they should usually value a rook over a knight, because in most games a rook will be more powerful than a knight long term. But no you're right, because capitalism assigns value to things that fluctuate based on the situation of the world (just like chess pieces change in value depending on their relevance in a position) we've been playing chess wrong this whole time! A0 knows that a rook is more valuable than a knight or bishop long term, but it also knows when it can sack material for a different long term advantage. The basic principles of general piece value still applies to chess at the GM lv and the A0 level, but so do many other principles. And the higher up the rating ladder you go, the better understanding of all principles is grasped. Denying probably THE most obvious and basic principle of the game is just ludicrous. Jesus Christ man, how about you learn a little about the world

  • @matthieuleperlier251
    @matthieuleperlier251 3 роки тому +1

    I recently discovered your content recently and it makes me want to play chess again, and actually learn!
    Thank you Anna :)

    • @hinteregions
      @hinteregions 3 роки тому

      I agree, Anna is a great teacher and good fun too. Thanks to her and Adgamator I DID play again after many years, I had a go at Beth Harmon chess computer and I recommend it to you as a great way to get yourself back into it. On 1600 I beat Beth easily but I don't fancy my chances at 1800 heh :)

  • @pizzacomananas
    @pizzacomananas Рік тому +1

    Your commentary is so soothing. Your voice is very comforting!

  • @surig9018
    @surig9018 4 роки тому +9

    Most underrated chess analyzer Anna Rudolf

  • @exax822
    @exax822 3 роки тому +3

    She explains the moves so simply, beautifully and with such passion that even I as a 1500 player can understand and appreciate the beauty of this game. My new fav chess channel!

  • @dialecticsjunkie7653
    @dialecticsjunkie7653 4 роки тому +7

    It's like chess is so advanced that we've returned to the Romantic Era.

    • @blazerheata6479
      @blazerheata6479 Рік тому

      Stockfish: Life should be planned carefully to be most fulfilling
      AlphaZero: IF YOU HAVEN'T SUFFERED OR FELT THE RAIN POUR AS YOU LAUGH, HAVE YOU TRULY LIVED?

  • @arasm5120
    @arasm5120 4 роки тому +2

    really enjoyable video. you have a nice voice and your commentary is easy to understand. I loved watching you talk 30 minutes about how fascinated you are by alphazero :D

  • @trevpr1
    @trevpr1 5 років тому +22

    I thought this was very well done. Would like to see more analysis like this Anna.

  • @Durian_Defense
    @Durian_Defense 5 років тому +11

    Was looking for a voice to voice Leela Chess Zero, ala Sierra Entertainment's 1996 PowerChess. Guess I found it.

  • @mollysmoshingtankcrew9441
    @mollysmoshingtankcrew9441 4 роки тому +125

    Alpha zero is basically Stalin
    "These pawns are blocking my other pieces, I'll just sacrifice them to get them out of the way"
    Absolute madlad

    • @milanstevic8424
      @milanstevic8424 3 роки тому +2

      Isn't chess already a game about being Stalin?

    • @daftsutradesign1318
      @daftsutradesign1318 3 роки тому +2

      @@milanstevic8424 I think Bobby Fischer said something to the tune that yes it's basically a game for egoists that want to prove something.

  • @dragicadraganovic889
    @dragicadraganovic889 4 роки тому

    Very well analyzed I have trouble with positional play but this video helped me improve. Thank you and by the way your accent is lovely. Keep up the good work.

  • @n20games52
    @n20games52 4 роки тому +4

    I've never seen coverage of this game before. Really amazing.

  • @JeffreyGold
    @JeffreyGold 5 років тому +6

    This has been the most charming presentation of chess I have ever personally experienced. Anna Rudolph makes chess fun...and fun to watch and analyze! Consider me a fan. Look me up when you find yourself in LA.
    Prophylactic move. That's hilarious.

    • @martinweiss3054
      @martinweiss3054 5 років тому

      Jeffrey Gold She’s not using the word in its sexual sense, but its meaning as “a precautionary or preventive measure”! PS check out KWVE.com- excellent Christian teaching!

    • @ShareefusMaximus
      @ShareefusMaximus 3 роки тому

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophylaxis_(chess)

  • @hibye-by3yb
    @hibye-by3yb 3 роки тому +1

    something wonderful about chess is that despite knowing only the rules, it is still captivating to understand the thought process and understand it once explained. Harder to do in Go.

  • @garamiglm2026
    @garamiglm2026 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you.. Totally loved the way this was presented