Wait until you play HDR content on the Samsung TV. Every color is off, and there are many shadows when objects move quickly. The waterfall looks blurry.
That’s a quick overview - but processing on G4 is superior to Samsung. Still no smooth gradation there so when presented with lower bitrate content you will see really nasty gradation. Unfortunately matte screen is more often bad than good imho. If you have light controlled room won’t be an issue though.
@@gokhan7482, it should, my Panasonic plasma, is 12 yrs old, and still going strong, which is why I haven’t run out and bought something !! It’s also easy to use, turn it on and watch, no, go to vivid, professional, hdr, etc, etc !!! Just a good picture !!!
@@dougnykel7693 Yep... LG customer service is far superior than Samsung. I had an issue with the remote after 2 years and they immediately gave me a new one! My LG B series is over 5️⃣ years old and still going strong! 🙏
Read about it - plethora of unresolved issues on Sony, and G4 processing is close match to Sony. Taking into account price difference Sony is absolutely not worth it.
@@jezza6575 either you have g4 or it doesn’t apply. Beside that Sony desaturates colors at low brightness and crashes shadow details. Sorry not paying premium for that. It’s a fact not an opinion
Samsung really effed up by not adding Dolby vision to their tv and LG effed up by not adding an anti glare screen option to their tv. Getting really sick of not getting accurate color representation matte screens with Dolby vision too.
My wife instantly noticed the anti-glare on the S95D vs our previous KS8500's glossy screen. I get that a glossy screen in a treated room with zero reflections may easily be better, but the appreciable difference in a real word, non-basement mounting, was tremendous.
낮에 영화나 티비를 볼때 확실히 SD95가 좋다 빛반사가 있고 없고 차이가 크다 화질은 그렇게 LG가 앞서있다고 볼수없다 요즘은 약간의 미세한 차이가 있긴 하지만 결론의 문제는 번인현상을 얼마나 막아주느냐 그게 문제인것이지 두쪽다 번인은 피해갈수 없는것이므로~~ 사람마다 보는 관점과 눈이 틀리니
If you're PC gaming though you'll be limited by the one connect box on the Samsung since it uses DSC, so you won't be able to use features like Nvidia DLDSR. Also the S95D doesn't come in 83" so if you're sitting at least 10 feet away, then the G4 is going to be the better option. Also the game mode on the G4 is perfect now compared to earlier models where the colors became slightly washed out. Both TVs are amazing though and you really can't go wrong with either.
@@floz9718 the glossy screen vs matte , the processing, Dolby vision build quality feels like I got what I paid for vs the Samsung . G4 won me over how smooth it is lower bit rate playback
Glossy tv screens are so tacky looking. Cinema screens are NOT glossy reflective screens. The Samsung looks more cutting edge and much more cinematic to me.
I saw both s90d and s95d ... and got the s90d for $1,000 less.. The problem with the s95d matt finish is it diffuses (softens) the picture and elevates Black and washes out the shadow detail with any ambient light which is a deal breaker IMO. any ambient light basically mitigates the entire point of an Oled's Inky black and shadow fidelity.... so at that point why not just Buy a QLED???? then at least your getting the much brighter performance.
There isn’t poor color volume there just more color volume with the Samsung it’s not for me to look like I’m watch everything as a cartoon . The colors on the g4 are all I need and love
No... Samsung has more color and brighter... than LG RGBW pixels where W pixel make colors blue and dark in gamma... LG just swith colors down... Sony Samsung has more and it is just better... if you don't want cartoon make a calibration...
Not a bad comparison but you missed comparing one of their biggest differences (based on other reviews I have seen), image processing including low-bit content and upscaling. Apparently LG is doing MUCH better in the area of processing with their newest models. Also, LG dropped ATSC 3.0 tuners from their new TVs going forward. Important for people wanting to use over-the-air antennas.
@@masomaf yea years ago CNET used to be the go-to place for TV reviews. Now they just scratch the surface. Digital Trends, HDTVTest, Rtings, Tech Steve, and even B The Installer give ore useful reviews on TVs than CNET these days. CNET TV reviews are definitely not for the enthusiasts.
I don't have a G4 but I have a G3 and no matter what picture settings I use, the S95D in store looked way better and more three dimensional. Didn't like the matte finish though
I love the LG remote. It's pointing 👉 device is amazing ❤️ and the fact you can flush mount it to the wall! LG OLED are leaders in the OLED technology. I would definitely go for the LGG4 83" if I had the choice!
Samsung is the leader of oled technology, your iPhone pixel ipad, and even all the samsung phones, etc, since 2002 samsung has been making oled, and even tv Samsung and Sony made the first oled tvs before LG. LG made woled for tv. Now thier is qd oled which is superior rgb oled compared to lgs woled
Yall need to get realistic. Always comparing. Listen woled is old and colors washed out in brightness and low saturation compared to qd oled. It's brighter colorful just better
@@afleo7475 just joking. My reason for not switching is lg supports all the right formats for home cinemas setup. Samsung is not or else i wouldv chsnged as well.
You had me at 'NON-reflective' with the Samsung. Apple started the glossy screen revolution with their iMacs ages ago (because humans...like birds, like glossy things), & we're still paying the price of that illogical & even idiotic devolution...so this is about time. Are we not men?!
@@jezza6575 It can still be an interesting for some. Technology used in the panel is important for sure but there are also customers who would prefer other then an OLED TV. And it is also interesting to compare top of the line products regardless technology used inside.
I did consider B9 but few points: - brightness difference is negligible- highlights are dimmer, only high APL scenes shine on B9 - micro contrast of Oled still unbeaten - in many scenes - albeit not all - you can see Sony as quite a bit washed out contrast - off angle viewing - 30 degrees off and you start noticing - if you won’t watch tv from that angles ever you won’t notice but if you will it might bother you - loss of color, color shift, blooming.
@@whitecrowuk575 details in bright and dark areas are much better on the Bravia 9. Micro contrast won't be as good but there's no blooming whilst the local dimming system is top notch.
if i can’t watch tv peacefully, its not worth it. Oled = stress. You have to be careful and watch out to not get pixel burn-in. This should be an ad for lcd tv’s😃
Why is one TV closer to the window when testing for reflections? Shouldn't they be one over the other so they both receive the same amount of light?
Exactly, this isn't a fair comparison. I think it even turned al little bit so the 'brick' wall could not catch the samsung in that angle
I really like the S95D in my opinion
Compare the G4 to the S90D as that has a glossy screen too
Nope mate it should be apples to apple... In terms of their class tier and money u pay it ideally is the right comparision
Yes it makes sense since I don't want a matte screen and the s90D is the next best samsung option
Wasn't LG G4 a phone?!
Good catch 😅😅
The S95D is a Vintage 1950's Turner S95D dynamic microphone😂😂😂😂😂
😂
That’s what makes it better than S95D. It can be a Phone and an OLED TV.😊
Yes it was. 💯
Wait until you play HDR content on the Samsung TV. Every color is off, and there are many shadows when objects move quickly. The waterfall looks blurry.
Thanks, your short comment helped me more than this pointless video, yes, seriously.
That’s a quick overview - but processing on G4 is superior to Samsung. Still no smooth gradation there so when presented with lower bitrate content you will see really nasty gradation. Unfortunately matte screen is more often bad than good imho. If you have light controlled room won’t be an issue though.
CNET, didn’t even mention the 5 yr burn in warranty by LG, which I think is pretty important for a $3000 tv.
main reason to go with lg, and with an apple tv it’s damn near perfect.
@@dougnykel7693 i think a tv should last longer than 10 years.
@@gokhan7482, it should, my Panasonic plasma, is 12 yrs old, and still going strong, which is why I haven’t run out and bought something !! It’s also easy to use, turn it on and watch, no, go to vivid, professional, hdr, etc, etc !!! Just a good picture !!!
@@dougnykel7693
Yep... LG customer service is far superior than Samsung.
I had an issue with the remote after 2 years and they immediately gave me a new one! My LG B series is over 5️⃣ years old and still going strong! 🙏
@@gokhan7482 I think so as well, but the way TV technology is growing, I would think most people would want to buy a new TV before ten years.
I just bought the s95d and the Matt finish in game changing and looks great at night and during the day where there is a lot of glare.
My home theater is intentionally kept dark. so with reflection problems out of the way, I am more interested in best contrast and clarity.
I just bought the s95d and the Matt finish in game changing and looks great at night and during the day where there is a lot of glare.
Then it's the G4 for you, way better processing, image quality is thru the roof !
I think I’d rather have an A95L, love Sony processing!
Read about it - plethora of unresolved issues on Sony, and G4 processing is close match to Sony. Taking into account price difference Sony is absolutely not worth it.
@@whitecrowuk575LG had to skip 3 generations Processor just to KEEP UP with Last year’s Sony’s XR chip
@@whitecrowuk575 Guess that’s why my current tv is a LG…still rather have the Sony picture quality!
@@jezza6575 either you have g4 or it doesn’t apply. Beside that Sony desaturates colors at low brightness and crashes shadow details. Sorry not paying premium for that. It’s a fact not an opinion
@@whitecrowuk575 Nope
Samsung really effed up by not adding Dolby vision to their tv and LG effed up by not adding an anti glare screen option to their tv. Getting really sick of not getting accurate color representation matte screens with Dolby vision too.
so the users experience limited to reflections? and not to picture quality.....Are you kidding me. Sound like samsung put a finger in you
My wife instantly noticed the anti-glare on the S95D vs our previous KS8500's glossy screen. I get that a glossy screen in a treated room with zero reflections may easily be better, but the appreciable difference in a real word, non-basement mounting, was tremendous.
LG boys watching the birds outside right now.
G4
G4 has 4 HDMI 2.1 ports
낮에 영화나 티비를 볼때 확실히 SD95가 좋다 빛반사가 있고 없고 차이가 크다 화질은 그렇게 LG가 앞서있다고 볼수없다 요즘은 약간의 미세한 차이가 있긴 하지만 결론의 문제는 번인현상을 얼마나 막아주느냐 그게 문제인것이지 두쪽다 번인은 피해갈수 없는것이므로~~ 사람마다 보는 관점과 눈이 틀리니
S95D hands down. Picture is juicer and gaming is so much better on a QDOLED.
No
@@sixstab2967yes qd oled>woled just accept it.
If you're PC gaming though you'll be limited by the one connect box on the Samsung since it uses DSC, so you won't be able to use features like Nvidia DLDSR.
Also the S95D doesn't come in 83" so if you're sitting at least 10 feet away, then the G4 is going to be the better option. Also the game mode on the G4 is perfect now compared to earlier models where the colors became slightly washed out.
Both TVs are amazing though and you really can't go wrong with either.
ah, no.
S95d returned and now loving the g4 better . I wanted to love the s95d and then I had to stick my nose in the lg g4 . The g4 is awesome !
What about the poorer Color Volume with the G4?
@@hastensavoir7782I just got the g4 over the a95l which is also qd OlED and the g4 doesn’t disappoint whatsoever despite not being qd OlED
What did you like better on the G4?
@@floz9718 the glossy screen vs matte , the processing, Dolby vision build quality feels like I got what I paid for vs the Samsung . G4 won me over how smooth it is lower bit rate playback
probably better motion on the LG? I heard also that gaming on samsung goes with little screen dropouts.
Glossy tv screens are so tacky looking. Cinema screens are NOT glossy reflective screens. The Samsung looks more cutting edge and much more cinematic to me.
You have indeed a point in that
I saw both s90d and s95d ... and got the s90d for $1,000 less.. The problem with the s95d matt finish is it diffuses (softens) the picture and elevates Black and washes out the shadow detail with any ambient light which is a deal breaker IMO. any ambient light basically mitigates the entire point of an Oled's Inky black and shadow fidelity.... so at that point why not just Buy a QLED???? then at least your getting the much brighter performance.
There isn’t poor color volume there just more color volume with the Samsung it’s not for me to look like I’m watch everything as a cartoon . The colors on the g4 are all I need and love
No... Samsung has more color and brighter... than LG RGBW pixels where W pixel make colors blue and dark in gamma... LG just swith colors down... Sony Samsung has more and it is just better... if you don't want cartoon make a calibration...
Viewing. The. Tv. Will be. Best. Way. To. Pick. The. Best. Lg. Samsung.
Talking. About. Them. Wont. Sell. Any. Mate. Try. Harder. 😊😊
Not a bad comparison but you missed comparing one of their biggest differences (based on other reviews I have seen), image processing including low-bit content and upscaling. Apparently LG is doing MUCH better in the area of processing with their newest models. Also, LG dropped ATSC 3.0 tuners from their new TVs going forward. Important for people wanting to use over-the-air antennas.
and LG has more sound types passed trough (DTS atmos etc etc )
@@masomaf yea years ago CNET used to be the go-to place for TV reviews. Now they just scratch the surface. Digital Trends, HDTVTest, Rtings, Tech Steve, and even B The Installer give ore useful reviews on TVs than CNET these days. CNET TV reviews are definitely not for the enthusiasts.
@DarkKnight-gw4gw Those guys are all UA-cam influencers that get paid to market every new tv.
LG Oled, the Boss! 😎
So which OLED TV has the best picture?
I don't have a G4 but I have a G3 and no matter what picture settings I use, the S95D in store looked way better and more three dimensional. Didn't like the matte finish though
store mode always looks better regardless of the brand @GGP337
They are close. Better check them out in a store.
@@AiBot3777 The G4 looks even more three dimensional and sharper than the S95D, and the motion on the G4 is better too.
Sony 🌌💟
Wow, matte is now incredible. It’s just mind boggling. Glad these companies are finally waking up to the gains
When it comes to TVs, it doesn't get better than LG
You're looking at one better than the LG, especially reliability
I love the LG remote. It's pointing 👉 device is amazing ❤️ and the fact you can flush mount it to the wall!
LG OLED are leaders in the OLED technology.
I would definitely go for the LGG4 83" if I had the choice!
Lg remote is trash
Its cheap
No pauze button
No backlit buttons
You can flash mount the Samsung aswell with their no gap mount..
Samsung is the leader of oled technology, your iPhone pixel ipad, and even all the samsung phones, etc, since 2002 samsung has been making oled, and even tv Samsung and Sony made the first oled tvs before LG. LG made woled for tv. Now thier is qd oled which is superior rgb oled compared to lgs woled
@@johanmelis12
Err
There is a pause button. The symbol is ⏸
It's on the bottom right 👉 hand side!
@@ksumar not on the g3 remote
Matte TV is great
Yall need to get realistic. Always comparing. Listen woled is old and colors washed out in brightness and low saturation compared to qd oled. It's brighter colorful just better
Not washed out to me I have the c2 and the colours are amazing
@@gosling349yeah cause u never saw a qd oled bro..
@marik8770 oversaturation of colors are not necessarily a good thing.
The LG G4 Oled is the best engineered quality product
It is probably from same factory
Samsung is the best ❤❤❤
LG OLED G4 all the way!
What about near-black uniformity?
(OLED's greatest and largely overlooked weakness).
G4 is inky black
I’ve been using LG OLED for years, then I saw this Samsung TV on a tech store and it blowed my mind. Now I’m going to switch to Samsung.
Traitor!
@@sixstab2967 Yeah, sorry :) Samsung nailed it.
@@sixstab2967not a traitor just seen sense in the fact that qd OLED is revolutionary over the ancient woled panel
@@afleo7475 just joking. My reason for not switching is lg supports all the right formats for home cinemas setup. Samsung is not or else i wouldv chsnged as well.
Love how this is a side by side comparison video and there’s barely any actual side by side straight video shots lol fail
Samsung takes it with the anti-reflective screen.
You had me at 'NON-reflective' with the Samsung.
Apple started the glossy screen revolution with their iMacs ages ago (because humans...like birds, like glossy things), & we're still paying the price of that illogical & even idiotic devolution...so this is about time.
Are we not men?!
now apple will charge you extra for anti glare finish
What about the real king the Sony A95L
Thanks for nothing😑
I can´t stand Matte Monitors anymore
2 drawbacks on Samsung. The one connect is a joke when mounting your TV, you have to Velcro it to the TV. Along with that it’s missing Dolby vision
Wait for the Sony Bravia 9 to arrive. Then do the test again and call it a day.
It’ll be a great tv but won’t complete with OLED!
@@jezza6575 It can still be an interesting for some. Technology used in the panel is important for sure but there are also customers who would prefer other then an OLED TV.
And it is also interesting to compare top of the line products regardless technology used inside.
I did consider B9 but few points:
- brightness difference is negligible- highlights are dimmer, only high APL scenes shine on B9
- micro contrast of Oled still unbeaten - in many scenes - albeit not all - you can see Sony as quite a bit washed out contrast
- off angle viewing - 30 degrees off and you start noticing - if you won’t watch tv from that angles ever you won’t notice but if you will it might bother you - loss of color, color shift, blooming.
@@whitecrowuk575 details in bright and dark areas are much better on the Bravia 9.
Micro contrast won't be as good but there's no blooming whilst the local dimming system is top notch.
Samsung TFT? No thank you.
if i can’t watch tv peacefully, its not worth it. Oled = stress. You have to be careful and watch out to not get pixel burn-in.
This should be an ad for lcd tv’s😃
Only if you use it as a computer screen. It should be good for 10 years plus.
@@serrael-182 modern tv's don't last 10 years anymore, whether oled or led or lcd
@masomaf Some of those fools, I mean consumers, upgrade TVS every year, so 10 years is not a factor.