If you enjoyed this episode, please consider supporting The Dharma Dispatch channel so we can offer more such interesting, informative and educational content related to Indian History, Sanatana Dharma, Hindu Culture and current affairs. 🙏🙏 UPI: dharmadispatch@axl Other Methods (QR Code, Wallet, Card, Netbanking, etc): pages.razorpay.com/DonatetoDD
He was a Muslim sympathiser. He used the illiterate Indians for his aim to pretend that he wanted freedom of India from the Raj. But deep down he had no interest. He was responsible for the division of India
@@arsalanmirza3411That is simplistic assessment. Gandhi selectively preached his perverted interpretation of 'non violence ' only to Hindus (who didn't need it) but never confronted or tried preaching peace to violence oriented Muslim community. His lopsided preachings have saddled the Hindu psyche with self guilt on this issue for almost 100 years, with serious loss of lives, territory and self confidence as a consequence. He needs to be seriously downgraded immediately As for Sanatan Dharma, Gandhi'sunderstanding of Hindu religious epics, especially Ramayan and Geeta was extremelyvague, it was more of eccentric intuition made more complicatedby his narcissistic tendency to always occupy centerstage. A muddlehead in short.
Gandhi's contribution to the building of modern India should be dispassionately evaluated. And how khilaphat movement paved the foundations of the growth of political islam.
When Mrs Indira Gandhi was approached by British movie director Attenborough for making a movie on Mahatma Gandhi, she unceremoniously said, he is a politician whose life will make interesting story without any reverence as Mahatma. Interpreting Indira Gandhi, it appears that she never considered Gandhiji as a Mahatma. Same goes for Dr. Ambedkar view of Gandhiji. However, Jinnah did not think highly of MK Gandhi despite his pro Islamic views
I feel more comfortable with reading books than viewing videos. And this subject is a very important one. Do you have plans to bring the contents in the form of printed book ? Please publish it and announce the details...
Excellent summary on Gandhi’s mistakes which we are still suffering from and hopefully 3rd son of Gujarat Modi may fix it. I consider Gandhi 1st and Sardar Patel 2nd and then Modi. 🙏
Mr Nehru was descandant of Bahadur ShahJaffar. Possibly his father was GiusuddinGazi changed his name to Balaram Nehru.So this Gandhi family is of muslim blood.Mr Gandhi was Harijan & was kicked out from South Africa & managed to get the chance to lead independent movement against British.He managed Mr Nehru as his urdent follower & became successful to divide India despite strong opposition from the then congress leaders. He arranged Delhi throne for Mr Nehru & Pakistan for Md Ali Jinna & remained as astute leader of Cong party as Hindu hater.
After that incident in South Africa when he was thrown out of a train -- 16 long years passed after which gandhi landed in British India -- 16 years!!!
Jawahar(lal) ali was cunning enough to share his cocubines with karamchand to achieve the ultimate objective.. the fool fell in alis trap.. mohamad ali and jawahar ali brothers divided india
❤I don't know if time will come when this hypocrite anti sanatani by thought is exposed in history book which we read. High time to remove Mahatma and rashtrpita names from him ❤
If the quintessential Hindu embedded in stoicism as his mantra to all things unexplained failures of his generation, squarely blames it on his Karma, he needs to follow this with the teachings of Sri Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita as an epilogue every time such a revelation on his recent past is over, which might bounce him back to shape.
लाल, बाल और पाल निर्भीक और गांधी से ज्यादातर बातों पर असहमत थे । इसीलिए लाला लाजपत राय, बाल गंगाधर तिलक और विपिन चन्द्र पाल को आजादी के बाद कांग्रेस की साजिश के तहत कोई अहमियत नहीं दी गई ।
you cant call the "Jalne wala bhag" a genocide. It was a manner that riot was controlled back then. It was not a genocide of any sort. Do you think the mugals would have allowed anyone to protest?
History will have to re-evaluate Gandhi’s role in India’s independence. As history pages are revisited Gandhi looks more like a villain than hero of India’s freedom movement. I wont be surprised if future generations of Indians have to erase the legacy of Gandhi/Nehru.
I don’t think some people need to be convinced; ruthlessness and cunningness go together. Simplicity, straightforward attitude, sincere…, all together go with the soul that we believe in.
No. Savarkar publicly spoke that if Hindus should get their "Hindu"stan even it means a separate land for Muslims. year: 1937 Place Ahmedabad. (after Savarkar ditched fredom struggle and joined with muslim league coalition in Bengal/Sind/NWFP. saving the British from a political crisis.
@@sambasivansambasivan7092 Chamcha of the British, Syed Ahmed Ali Khan made an appeal for separate muslim land well before in 1879. Choudhary Rehmat Ali came up with the word "Pakistan" and a map in 1933. By the way, a separate electorate for Muslims was awarded in Indian Councils Act 1909.
Dr. Sandeep, while providing the historical context to Khilafat and the support of Congress to it, has missed a historical progression of Congress' Policy towards Ms from the time of Mr B Tayyabaji, the impact of Bengals partition on the thought process of Congress leaders and Indian society, the role of Lucknow pact in parallasing congress to every demand of Mslms. All these trails eventually lead to the Path of Mr Gandhi who along with his own thought process lead it to some unexpected outcome. Also, in 1919 Tilak was well out of jail, however was plagued by his own sicknesses. However, the literary evidence suggests that he was not in favour supporting the Khilafat and was of the opinion that if Mslms have to be convinced for any collaboration it should be on the terms of nationalist swaraj movement itself and not otherwise!
The support's objective was to defeat British the bigger enemy . Gandhi ji is no more so nice opportunity to malign a person who cannot answer back now.
The Ottoman Caliphate had perpetrated a genocide of several minority communities within their empire over two decades just prior to Gandhi merging his movement in the Indian Islamic movement for the reinstatement of the Caliphate. Even after the horrors of the Malabar massacres were known Gandhi was not repentant. He provided the template for pseudo secularism at the expense of Hindu dharma which has continued to this day. Despite all that has happened to the minorities of the separated parts.
@@ananthan8951 Malabar Masscares ? It was fight between landowners and workers. It is given a religious angle by right wing fascists as it suits building up minority hate . It started as an uprising against rulers by people oppressed. The time was different. Bigger enemy was british . They had already divided Bengal on religion. Was division of Bengal in 1905 done by British or not ? It is easier to criticise people no longer in the world. The dead cannot answer back and in hindsight criticism becomes good. He was better than bootlickers and sycophants of British the right wing pseudo dharma protectors.
@@manojkrpar Don't give out blatant nonsense. Even by official accounts, ten thousand three hundred or so were killed all Hindus and maybe two hundred were landowners. Landowners had resources like strong houses with unbreakable doors, plenty of food stocks etc. Many of them left for safer places sensing something brewing (though none expected a genocide) .The rest were poor peasants and agricultural labourers who lived in huts. I know those parts intimately. Do some research. Diwan Bahadur C Gopalan Nair (Moplah Rebellion 1921) Sir Chettur Sankaran Nair (Gandhi and Anarchy) both of whom were eminent people who had studied the episode in depth immediately and Dr Annie Basant who did her own research all judged it as a one sided communal carnage and were severely critical of Gandhi on this count.
What an impossible character; and also one needs to give a serious thought to the theory that many Deshbhakt Indians, particularly those sufferers at the hands of Muslims during the post-partition days that doubt MKG's parentage that he was born while his official mother was in captivity in his Official Father's Muslim employer's household, the reason being that he was caught red-handed making some financial deal with a guy who owed money to the Moneyed Muslim in whose office the official father of MKG was the Chief Accountant! The man knew that since he has been caught on the vile act he can't escape death and he left Porbandar in a great hurry. And the Muslim owner, as was the norm those days. got hold of MKG's mother and others of the family and kept them in his household as unpaid slaves. And MKG was born in that period of captivity, which was of quite a long period with no trace of his official father anywhere in the vicinity. And many attribute this background to MKG's unusually extreme soft corner toward that particular community!
Gandhi bashing continues unabated !Shame !Shame ! Shame !Small minds fail to fathom the greatness of Mahatma who is next only to Christ and Bddha !Jai Bharath !
Thankless Indians may give up Bapu ,but his profound legacy has been taken over by the whole world for his eternal principles,ideals and values.He is the only hope for the present and the future .
Indian constitutions preamble reads , this constitution accepts all the faiths beliefs and their practices " . This is a open general statment in our preamble without any caviet attached to it. Preamble of constitution in most of democracy is the supream statment which can not be tempered with. You may amend constitution but not preamble British constitution specifically mentions this and our constitution 85 to 90 percent has come from britushers . It's a diffrent thing that indira gandhi tempered with preamble of our constitutional during dark 2 years of our democracy in 70s bye infusing seculer word in it to appease leftist communist but even so such genral ststment is compleatly without application of mind . This being a hindu majority country , abrahmic faith and belief call idol worshipers infidels, kafirs and what not and even worst life on earth and some books even call idol worshippers " wajibey qutal " means good yo kill . Now when hindu majorierty .preamble allowes such practices to be taught in Islamic schools and churches then what do you call this? You call this paradigm of tolerance . Imagine if 10 people are sitting and 11th guy comes tell all 10 people that ull are worst then corcoches . Worst life on planet and you have no right to live and my God has dicted to kill you if you do not convert to my way of life then what will thoes 10 guys to that singal person . They will send him to 72 virgins .🤣 but 1.20 billion are quietly tolerating this not just in society but through bloody constitution which allows the minority to not just read and learn all this nonsense against us but also say , preach, teach and practise such nonsense . We are bloody 1.2 billion hindus yet theas 200 million people practise all this nonsense with permission of our preamble. This you can call mount everest of tolerance or compleat idiotic acceptance from hindus . This happens because by nature we pity such thoughts and people who are compleatly lost their brains and also because of pathatic leftist politicians who protect such nonsense only for that few minority votes . Now some fools in west and elsewhere keep complaing about tolerance in india. In reality if hindus wear not paradigm of tolerance then today not a singal muslin would be alive in hindu majorierty india. Irony is even chritians and athiest too insult hindus through their books in whole sale and they too are allowed to continue . Meaning of tolerance is being massively misused in india against Hindus. Today 13 Islamic countries have death penalty for leftist atheist including Pakistan and Maldives and what is God of athiest China doing? Catching all thease zombies who are abusing athiest through their books is catching them and putting them in camps and fools in west condem China instead of telling thease relgions to remove all thease nonsense from their books but you see we are hindus so what do we do ? We take thease haters of hindus through their relgions and make them presidents or super stars of India. So before pointing fingers at hindus about tolerance be clear rest of the world dose not come within 100 miles of hindus as far as tolerance is concerned .
More important things should be told than what conspiracies and sins gandhi committed against Bharat. He was an agent of the british, history is witness to this. Now gandhi will not do any good work for Bharat. This is all that needs to be said about gandhi.
If you enjoyed this episode, please consider supporting The Dharma Dispatch channel so we can offer more such interesting, informative and educational content related to Indian History, Sanatana Dharma, Hindu Culture and current affairs. 🙏🙏
UPI: dharmadispatch@axl
Other Methods (QR Code, Wallet, Card, Netbanking, etc): pages.razorpay.com/DonatetoDD
Does google pay work
@@DharmaDispatch Fake 🥸 News 👎🏻 Half Truth mixed with Outright Lies and slander ℹ️ Misinformation and Disinformation at best ‼️
❤Very informative and nicely decoded pages of Muslim Congress of Gandhi ❤
@@muktasharma8656 Yes.
Fraudatma Gandhi
Namaskar Parag ji and Sandeep ji. Just now donated Rs. 2k.
Thank you so much 👍👍
Thank you.
PLEASE SPREAD THIS TRUTH. VERY FEW INDIAN HINDUS KNOW THE TRUTH
Gandhi was a father of Pakistan.
He was a Muslim sympathiser. He used the illiterate Indians for his aim to pretend that he wanted freedom of India from the Raj. But deep down he had no interest. He was responsible for the division of India
Gandhi - greatest "Delusional Mind" of the 20th century.
Gandhi was Father of Anti-Hindu and Muslim Appeasement Politics in India
Arey Dikra 🐒 Don’t you know MK GANDHI was a True SANATAM DHARMI ⁉️
Gandhi was 100 years ahead of his time. He was an original woke in 1920's.
@@mxxmauuhan3597 More precisely, he was a true SANATAM DHARMI 🙌
He was a thug for sanatan dharma @@arsalanmirza3411
@@arsalanmirza3411That is simplistic assessment. Gandhi selectively preached his perverted interpretation of 'non violence ' only to Hindus (who didn't need it) but never confronted or tried preaching peace to violence oriented Muslim community. His lopsided preachings have saddled the Hindu psyche with self guilt on this issue for almost 100 years, with serious loss of lives, territory and self confidence as a consequence. He needs to be seriously downgraded immediately As for Sanatan Dharma, Gandhi'sunderstanding of Hindu religious epics, especially Ramayan and Geeta was extremelyvague, it was more of eccentric intuition made more complicatedby his narcissistic tendency to always occupy centerstage. A muddlehead in short.
Very insightful and thank you 🙏🙏🙏
PLEASE SPREAD THIS TRUTH. VERY FEW INDIAN HINDUS KNOW THE TRUTH..
Gandhi at that time when he came from Africa loved men, he already had a German lover when he was in Africa so not surprised by his remark!
Very informative and exact narration which present youths must know. The real face of mkg.
Thankyou for the expose. Future generations as well as the present one ( interested Indians ) will be forever obliged to Samdeepji
Dhanyavad, will be supporting you regularly
Gandhi's contribution to the building of modern India should be dispassionately evaluated. And how khilaphat movement paved the foundations of the growth of political islam.
MKG was British Agent brought from Southafrica.act as "pressure relief valve" to Armed Independance Struggle of India.
Very correct
30 years of prison, we went through by the name of the so-called school and colleges 😮😢😮😢😮😢
you are very lucky there are so many who spent all their lives and even refuse to hear the brutality of a pimp of brits
Great one👏Thank you for educating us
Glad you enjoyed it
When Mrs Indira Gandhi was approached by British movie director Attenborough for making a movie on Mahatma Gandhi, she unceremoniously said, he is a politician whose life will make interesting story without any reverence as Mahatma. Interpreting Indira Gandhi, it appears that she never considered Gandhiji as a Mahatma. Same goes for Dr. Ambedkar view of Gandhiji.
However, Jinnah did not think highly of MK Gandhi despite his pro Islamic views
Sir keep exposing the one of the biggest frauds in Indian history. Thank you so much for working for Dharma.
Thanks for your generosity. Much appreciated!
Great Work Sandeepji
Father of Pakistan - MKG would have been more appropriate? Bharat existed eons before the mahatma came.
Do not call the traitor a mahatma,a total misnomer.
His Idea of satyagraha non violence killed millions of Hindus by muslims but MKG still supported the muslims but not Hindus.😊😊
Namaskar Sandeep ji..
In reality, he should be known as father of muslims and father of deshdroh.
Exactly. That's why Rahul has been following Gandhi's appeasement politics
Jai shree ram.
I feel more comfortable with reading books than viewing videos. And this subject is a very important one.
Do you have plans to bring the contents in the form of printed book ?
Please publish it and announce the details...
Excellent summary on Gandhi’s mistakes which we are still suffering from and hopefully 3rd son of Gujarat Modi may fix it. I consider Gandhi 1st and Sardar Patel 2nd and then Modi. 🙏
Modi can't fix it, u need an aggressive yogi adityanath not a licker of gaandi
Great work. Keep it up. More strength to you and your team.
Fantastic talk as always koti pranams to Sandeep jee and Dharma Dispatch
Psycho-analyse MK by checking out his parents and his childhood.
Also, hope you cover Joseph Lelyveld's book.
Please analyse the minutes of Lucknow Pact.
Sir MK gandi's friendship with khilafate terror,and other jihadists and islamists were fatal to bharat people who are suffering more now???😮😮
Gandhi was in favour and interested in turky khilafat.
Hate with hindu young karantiakri
Mr Nehru was descandant of
Bahadur ShahJaffar.
Possibly his father was GiusuddinGazi
changed his name to
Balaram Nehru.So
this Gandhi family is
of muslim blood.Mr
Gandhi was Harijan
& was kicked out from
South Africa & managed to get the
chance to lead independent movement against
British.He managed
Mr Nehru as his urdent follower &
became successful
to divide India despite
strong opposition from the then congress leaders.
He arranged Delhi
throne for Mr Nehru
& Pakistan for Md Ali
Jinna & remained as
astute leader of Cong
party as Hindu hater.
After that incident in South Africa when he was thrown out of a train -- 16 long years passed after which gandhi landed in British India -- 16 years!!!
Very educative and informative discussion, if true!
Dr Sandeep ji please provide hindi edition of your prominent book for us
M K Gandhi was a very wily person like our present day Kejriwal.
मोहन दास करमचंद गाँधी का मोहम्मद अली जौहर को देखते ही फ़िदा हो जाने की कीमत सार देश को चुकाना पड़ा।
please make more video on gandhi and expose him atleast people who are educated will see
I don't understand which fool conferred him with Mahatma to which he was not at all eligible.😂
This needs to be in school history books!
Jawahar(lal) ali was cunning enough to share his cocubines with karamchand to achieve the ultimate objective.. the fool fell in alis trap.. mohamad ali and jawahar ali brothers divided india
गांधी को महाशेतानगांधी कहना चाहिए नहि की जो अभी हम कहते है,वो शब्द भी गांधी के साथ उसका नाम जुड़ने से भी बुरा मानता होगा
❤I don't know if time will come when this hypocrite anti sanatani by thought is exposed in history book which we read. High time to remove Mahatma and rashtrpita names from him ❤
MkG is the most successfully marketed demigod;
Terrible actions of the so called Mahatma jeopardized Hindu unity.
Fraudatma Gandhi
Sir U should put episode no. On the tittle. Also the videos in the playlist are not in right order.
It is painful that M K Gandhi is being recognised as Mahatma, even today.
how much Modi is following Gandhi now? what will be the repercussions?
Omar, The Second Khalifa Was Hero Of Mohan Gandhi.
If the quintessential Hindu embedded in stoicism as his mantra to all things unexplained failures of his generation, squarely blames it on his Karma, he needs to follow this with the teachings of Sri Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita as an epilogue every time such a revelation on his recent past is over, which might bounce him back to shape.
Given up on recognizing him as Father of India long time back after the Khilafat movement and his reaction to communal riots during that period
लाल, बाल और पाल निर्भीक और गांधी से ज्यादातर बातों पर असहमत थे । इसीलिए लाला लाजपत राय, बाल गंगाधर तिलक और विपिन चन्द्र पाल को आजादी के बाद कांग्रेस की साजिश के तहत कोई अहमियत नहीं दी गई ।
Gandhi was a fanatic , fox .
What were Indian people doing when this was done. India never had mass high quality education.
गांधी की कोई भूल नहि थी गांधी बड़ा शातिर लीडर था।😊
Unfortunately Godse was a baby then
There were many who wanted to kill him, Godse got lucky.
Very good👍👍
you cant call the "Jalne wala bhag" a genocide. It was a manner that riot was controlled back then. It was not a genocide of any sort. Do you think the mugals would have allowed anyone to protest?
History will have to re-evaluate Gandhi’s role in India’s independence. As history pages are revisited Gandhi looks more like a villain than hero of India’s freedom movement. I wont be surprised if future generations of Indians have to erase the legacy of Gandhi/Nehru.
I don’t think some people need to be convinced; ruthlessness and cunningness go together. Simplicity, straightforward attitude, sincere…, all together go with the soul that we believe in.
Who knows the inside stories and reality? many of the glorified news and texts are doubtful for authenticity
He worked with lepers, lived with them. Helped anti leprosy efforts. Can you please make a series on that please.
Gandhi should be termed anti-national. He's lost his connect with his santana motherland
I said this before. Gandhi is the father of Pakistan
No. Savarkar publicly spoke that if Hindus should get their "Hindu"stan even it means a separate land for Muslims. year: 1937 Place Ahmedabad. (after Savarkar ditched fredom struggle and joined with muslim league coalition in Bengal/Sind/NWFP. saving the British from a political crisis.
@@sambasivansambasivan7092 Chamcha of the British, Syed Ahmed Ali Khan made an appeal
for separate muslim land well before in 1879. Choudhary Rehmat Ali came up with the word "Pakistan" and a map in 1933. By the way, a separate electorate for Muslims was awarded in Indian Councils Act 1909.
With the passage of time, Gandhi's true face has got exposed as the biggest curse for, what remains of India, in general and of Hindus in particular.
Innocent Hundu
Dr. Sandeep, while providing the historical context to Khilafat and the support of Congress to it, has missed a historical progression of Congress' Policy towards Ms from the time of Mr B Tayyabaji, the impact of Bengals partition on the thought process of Congress leaders and Indian society, the role of Lucknow pact in parallasing congress to every demand of Mslms. All these trails eventually lead to the Path of Mr Gandhi who along with his own thought process lead it to some unexpected outcome. Also, in 1919 Tilak was well out of jail, however was plagued by his own sicknesses. However, the literary evidence suggests that he was not in favour supporting the Khilafat and was of the opinion that if Mslms have to be convinced for any collaboration it should be on the terms of nationalist swaraj movement itself and not otherwise!
The support's objective was to defeat British the bigger enemy . Gandhi ji is no more so nice opportunity to malign a person who cannot answer back now.
The Ottoman Caliphate had perpetrated a genocide of several minority communities within their empire over two decades just prior to Gandhi merging his movement in the Indian Islamic movement for the reinstatement of the Caliphate. Even after the horrors of the Malabar massacres were known Gandhi was not repentant. He provided the template for pseudo secularism at the expense of Hindu dharma which has continued to this day. Despite all that has happened to the minorities of the separated parts.
@@ananthan8951 Malabar Masscares ? It was fight between landowners and workers. It is given a religious angle by right wing fascists as it suits building up minority hate . It started as an uprising against rulers by people oppressed. The time was different. Bigger enemy was british . They had already divided Bengal on religion. Was division of Bengal in 1905 done by British or not ? It is easier to criticise people no longer in the world. The dead cannot answer back and in hindsight criticism becomes good. He was better than bootlickers and sycophants of British the right wing pseudo dharma protectors.
@@manojkrpar Don't give out blatant nonsense. Even by official accounts, ten thousand three hundred or so were killed all Hindus and maybe two hundred were landowners. Landowners had resources like strong houses with unbreakable doors, plenty of food stocks etc. Many of them left for safer places sensing something brewing (though none expected a genocide) .The rest were poor peasants and agricultural labourers who lived in huts. I know those parts intimately. Do some research. Diwan Bahadur C Gopalan Nair (Moplah Rebellion 1921) Sir Chettur Sankaran Nair (Gandhi and Anarchy) both of whom were eminent people who had studied the episode in depth immediately and Dr Annie Basant who did her own research all judged it as a one sided communal carnage and were severely critical of Gandhi on this count.
Gandhiji son converted to islam which was frowned upon by Gandhiji
Corny Oldman.
Agastya is the father of India
whether it's India Bharatha whichever name you choose
Rshi Agastya is
is the Father of our Nation
India or Bharatvarsh
Mr Sandeep Balakrishnan, you look a little bit like Gandhi with your glasses 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 .
This was a good expose.
Had Sardar Bhagat Singh been alive, N.V. Godse would've remained unknown to the world.
What an impossible character; and also one needs to give a serious thought to the theory that many Deshbhakt Indians, particularly those sufferers at the hands of Muslims during the post-partition days that doubt MKG's parentage that he was born while his official mother was in captivity in his Official Father's Muslim employer's household, the reason being that he was caught red-handed making some financial deal with a guy who owed money to the Moneyed Muslim in whose office the official father of MKG was the Chief Accountant! The man knew that since he has been caught on the vile act he can't escape death and he left Porbandar in a great hurry. And the Muslim owner, as was the norm those days. got hold of MKG's mother and others of the family and kept them in his household as unpaid slaves. And MKG was born in that period of captivity, which was of quite a long period with no trace of his official father anywhere in the vicinity. And many attribute this background to MKG's unusually extreme soft corner toward that particular community!
@a73366 what non sense
Gandhi bashing continues unabated !Shame !Shame ! Shame !Small minds fail to fathom the greatness of Mahatma who is next only to Christ and Bddha !Jai Bharath !
Maha Gand# Kareem Chand
@unniag7 Very true, preoccupation with bashing Gandhi. The current generations will get their bashing when they are gone.😢
MK GANDHI ALONG WITH JAWAHARLAL NEHRU WERE THE ONLY TRUE SANATAM DHARMA HINDUS IN THE CONGRESS PARTY ‼️
Absolutely false
@@bcj658 Prove it ‼️
@@arsalanmirza3411
Their role in planting the seeds of appeasement politics is not enough proof?
@@SriranganathHosur LOL 😂 BAQWAS is your “proof” 🤣 Well done 👍 Keep going down the tube 🚽 you’ll find more of the same 😆
@@arsalanmirza3411
Agar dhimak mein sochne nahin ayaa toh, kyun na sach ko bhagwaz kehe aur muh chupaakar kamment karney ke prayaas kare
MAHATMA GANDHI AMAR RAHE 👍💪🏼👏🎉
Thankless Indians may give up Bapu ,but his profound legacy has been taken over by the whole world for his eternal principles,ideals and values.He is the only hope for the present and the future .
@@unniag7019 Not All Indians are Fascist Racist RSS-BJP THUGS 👎🏻
Why can't you speak in Hindi?
Nice bakwaas
What else can Katwa say? HBUY Humiliation be upon you .
Indian constitutions preamble reads , this constitution accepts all the faiths beliefs and their practices " . This is a open general statment in our preamble without any caviet attached to it. Preamble of constitution in most of democracy is the supream statment which can not be tempered with. You may amend constitution but not preamble
British constitution specifically mentions this and our constitution 85 to 90 percent has come from britushers .
It's a diffrent thing that indira gandhi tempered with preamble of our constitutional during dark 2 years of our democracy in 70s bye infusing seculer word in it to appease leftist communist but even so such genral ststment is compleatly without application of mind .
This being a hindu majority country , abrahmic faith and belief call idol worshipers infidels, kafirs and what not and even worst life on earth and some books even call idol worshippers " wajibey qutal " means good yo kill . Now when hindu majorierty .preamble allowes such practices to be taught in Islamic schools and churches then what do you call this? You call this paradigm of tolerance . Imagine if 10 people are sitting and 11th guy comes tell all 10 people that ull are worst then corcoches . Worst life on planet and you have no right to live and my God has dicted to kill you if you do not convert to my way of life then what will thoes 10 guys to that singal person . They will send him to 72 virgins .🤣 but 1.20 billion are quietly tolerating this not just in society but through bloody constitution which allows the minority to not just read and learn all this nonsense against us but also say , preach, teach and practise such nonsense . We are bloody 1.2 billion hindus yet theas 200 million people practise all this nonsense with permission of our preamble. This you can call mount everest of tolerance or compleat idiotic acceptance from hindus . This happens because by nature we pity such thoughts and people who are compleatly lost their brains and also because of pathatic leftist politicians who protect such nonsense only for that few minority votes . Now some fools in west and elsewhere keep complaing about tolerance in india. In reality if hindus wear not paradigm of tolerance then today not a singal muslin would be alive in hindu majorierty india. Irony is even chritians and athiest too insult hindus through their books in whole sale and they too are allowed to continue . Meaning of tolerance is being massively misused in india against Hindus.
Today 13 Islamic countries have death penalty for leftist atheist including Pakistan and Maldives and what is God of athiest China doing? Catching all thease zombies who are abusing athiest through their books is catching them and putting them in camps and fools in west condem China instead of telling thease relgions to remove all thease nonsense from their books but you see we are hindus so what do we do ? We take thease haters of hindus through their relgions and make them presidents or super stars of India. So before pointing fingers at hindus about tolerance be clear rest of the world dose not come within 100 miles of hindus as far as tolerance is concerned .
More important things should be told than what conspiracies and sins gandhi committed against Bharat. He was an agent of the british, history is witness to this. Now gandhi will not do any good work for Bharat. This is all that needs to be said about gandhi.
Illa Ullla Booooringaaaaaa
Gandhi was not controlled by Hindu but by Britain and mullahs khilafat movement