Yes, the title is intended to draw in the conspiracy theorists. Clickbait for the greater good. While you are here, Real Science just released a fantastic video on the challenges surrounding Covid-19 testing. It taught me a lot about how viral tests work and why we are struggling to keep up: ua-cam.com/video/-DTcZnHHTA8/v-deo.html
Real science isnt always correct, or honest. No safety studies have been done on %G tech , and its effects on hu,man cells and health. I dont trust big business and I especially dont trust scientist who specialize in only 1 area.
Your opening statement in the video is correct. I just have to claim you're just in the pocket of big data or just not awake and to them all arguments following that are just fake news. Confirmation bias is a bitch.
"Every day technologies [like this] can seem like magic until you peel back the layers to their earliest iteration and see that they are just the product of many years of problem solving with each successive generation adding more complexity." This says a lot about why some people are afraid of technology. Knowledge helps us not be afraid! Thanks for another wonderful video.
Joseph Craven Sadly though some people won’t accept the information because they were informed by and trusted the wrong sources and now they are set on it.
David Ryall The Nazis? Amatuers! The US and Russia took Nazi rocketry and strapped nuclear warheads on top and held the whole world to ransom for decades.
Having worked in the RF field for over 20 years it is my opinion that it is “magic”. It’s like doing math in your head when your teacher wants you to show your work. It’s not real unless someone can see it. A lot of people are just happy that something works; they don’t care why it works. I once had a Colonel ask me why he couldn’t call someone in the States. I explained to him how the sun will disrupt satellite communications because it’s the biggest source of RF. He said I was lazy and to just get it working. So “troubleshot” (read play my Xbox) for about 4 hours until the sun was not overpowering my equipment. We feed him a line about motor calibration and swapping out an LNA.
It's quite interesting how these conspiracy theorist exist basically because of ignorance. Our current technology would look like sorcery to people a thousand years ago and it's understandable, yet there are people ignorant enough about modern7 technology in this very day.
Street lights are only hazardous if your an Astronomer whom wishes to see clear observable skies without city street sulfur lamps affecting their viewing for astrophotography. Other than that you don't wish to be near that same lamp that is broken near you for fear of the shards of glass imploding and fume of sulfur coming your way.
@@nanochad2979 Oxygen is extremely dangerous! It causes fires, and it destroys valuable infrastructure (steel and reinforced concrete.) It's so reactive that a broad category of chemical reactions is named after it! Eliminating free oxygen from Earth's atmosphere will surely end most of mankind's problems, and in fact many of these will be corrected long before that goal is attained.
Some person: Burns down cell tower. (3g,4g,5g who cares) Accidentally lights themselves on fire in the process.. Rings for ambulance, What no signal WTF is going on? See they know, they know!! They are blocking my calls!!!!
What about the legitimate studies that say it's potentially dangerous? Also why is this even in my suggestions? This is very suspicious. Just google 5g causes cancer in rats. The national toxicology program concluded that. So make up your own mind. This might be propaganda. And before people start replying with the other inevitable, it's 1 billion times stronger than any frequencies blah blah..and natural light causes cancer....and it wasn't 5g. Actually, the studies were 4x the legally permitted amount(notice how people will say a thousand times, this is misleading, they are comparing the standard 4x the legally permitted maximum to the lowest amount they subjected a rat featus to, a minisulce amount of RFR) It also doesn't take in to account human error. Output error. Effects on small children or babies. Also. Another thing we will hear is the WHO who classified it as possibly carcinogenic to humans - they'll say it's Carcinogenic 2B. The same as....coffee... possibly dangerous. However Pesticide Drift. Cigarettes. Etc. Have also once had the same classification. I already know all the replies. It's a shame people can't just accept..it might be dangerous. That's all I'm saying. Might be. Not 100% ....but even 1% chance is too high. Oh and the non ionised RFR argument.... I know it already. And before you start trying to debunk my automatically assuming they are not legitimate. We are talking about the WHO and NTP, and government programs in Italy, so decide for yourself if you think the top scientists in the world are legitimate or not. Edit: People are already using the arguments I just debunked. This is such a shame. I don't understand human psychology, I don't get you people. Do you just believe everything you're told, does history set no precedent? Big pharma, corporations, big industry is capable of lying and misleading.
There was a lockdown during the Black Death Plague. That's how Issac Newton discovered his laws and theories because he was stuck inside. I wonder how half of Europe died...
"I have a foreboding of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time -- when the United States is a service and information economy; when nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries; when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few, and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues; when the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority; when, clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide, almost without noticing, back into superstition and darkness..." -Carl Sagan
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups. The irony is the thing they rail against, some (in this case telecom) tech, they use to propagate their stupidity. We primates are funny creatures, ain't we?
"My first cell phone was the legendary Nokia 3310, which could be used to txt" or as a hammer, brick, paving stone or just about anywhere you needed something indestructible.
@@theyredistortingyourrhythm130 Also, this video is all about the engineering behind it, hence the channel's name Real Engineering, and NOT Real Hospital or Health smh.
@@Ikbeneengeit electrical and electronic engineer here, i don like maths... look up on fourier series (it's maths that breakdown a single frequency into multiple frequency) if u understand what i'm talking about
Oliver - 5G is Childs Play. NextGen TV (ATSC 3.0) in North America is a Completely IP based 4K HDR TV service that is FREE. NextGen tv uses the SAME 6 mhz Broadcasting Channel as B+W and later Color TV. and in the 1990's the first American DIGITAL tv was Born. NextGen tv is a Completely IP based signal from a Tower and from Multiple SIMULCAST towers. it can deliver 4K HDR Dolby content Wirelessly. and it can Deliver to Existing 4K tv with a Wireless Gateway Receiver and the Receiver has Both WiFi and a HDMI cable. this means it can Deliver to Smart TV with Wifi or Older TV with HDMI. and any Wireless Device you own can NOW Receive NextGen tv form the Gateway. Today there are Already American HDTV with a (ATSC 3.0 ) NextGen Receiver on the market in 2020. NextGen tv Transmitters are Exceptionally ROBUST and can deliver 4K HDR Inside Homes, Apartments and DEEP into Buildings. the Future of Wireless is IP based Communications with SIMULCAST Towers. this includes Public Safety radios , Hospitals, Commerical Radio, and Personal Communications.
@@Ikbeneengeit as a communications engineer for 30+ years, it is the only subject other then ancient history that I still study and the only one I actually use in the real world. Math explains everything as well as creating it.
8:32 The magic has a name. It's called Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). An ancient mathematical transformation that engineers kept dreaming of implementing it in wireless systems. That dream became reality when semiconductors technology finally enabled it to implemented in HW and integrated into wireless modems.
I’m an architect who designs telecom infrastructure mainly for Verizon and you’re correct about the fear being high powered 5G antennas. While it’s not the 5G that can hurt you, it’s the large amount of waves from the large LS6 antennas. But, you only have to worry about those if you’re a few feet in front. We do something called an EME report, or Electromagnet Energy report, which is solely to make the site safe for our contractors and owners.
@@goatsinjay7945 The signal power of any RF signal used for mobile communication, especially in higher 28 GHz frequencies for 5G, drops to a fraction after a few meters in free air. E.g. around 5 millionth after 2 meters for 28 Ghz. During the construction of any tower you calculate the required safety distance and afterwards you measure it for the report. Unless you're standing right in front of the panel antennas, the power that reaches you is tiny. If you do stand in front of the antenna, you are first of all trespassing and most likely climbed up a 30 meter tower. If you're concerned about the EMF radiation, burning street lights might indeed be the better approach as they might emit some UV. Also you should never expose your skin to the sun light, lots of UV in that
The only negative effect I would think of is the massive environmental damage caused by installing thousands of extra towers and the energy consumed by them while we are trying to go energy efficient at everything else
@@goatsinjay7945 Step 1: Do report Step 2: Determine if reasonably safe If safe jump to step 4 If not safe; Step 3: Change the design/equipment to make it safe and go back to step 1 Step 4: Outline what is and isn't dangerous to the people who will be in the area (set up warning signs around the site to keep people out, tell the people working there how close they have to be for it to be dangerous, fence off the dangerous area, etc.) Grossly oversimplified, but you get the point, the report doesn't make something safe, it determines what is/isn't safe, how safe/dangerous different things are under different circumstances and how best to ensure safety within reason (within reason meaning people would have to be stupid or go out of their way to be put in danger).
@@12346798Mann you had me right until the end, UV rays from the sun aren’t given the credit they deserve. They’re the saturated fats in the proper human diet world.
Orthogonal encoding is basically using codes that can be distinguished from each other even when added together. Like one channel might use 00001111 for 0 and 00110011 for 1, and another channel might use 00101101 for 0 and 01101001 for 1. Because those codes are different enough, even if both are transmitted at the same time on the same frequencies, the computers can still split them apart at the receiver. The more interesting stuff comes from power division multiplexing, where the channels are distinguished by being high power (for the more distant receiver) or low power (for the closer receiver). This may sound simpler, but it is actually harder to use in practice.
same, and I actually had to deal with the math in uni. it's all only ever explained in heaps and heaps of complex (as in 'a+bi', not as in 'complicated') maths, so no understanding of the mechanics of it all stuck around in my head after the exam.
If there wasn't any health effects caused by non-ionizing radiation and their corresponding electromagnetic fields on biological systems then how come the field of science known as Magnetobiolgy exists and there are thousands of published studies in the field?
5G cuts into consumer electronics like wireless microphones and headsets. Many DJ, bands, and announcers using wireless mics have been rendered useless over the last few years due to frequency auctions from T-Mobile and Verizon. Nothing big to those companies, but the small end user gets screwed!
@@jonathanweimane6926 next generation of cars that will talk to each other so cars around can now intentions of surrounding vechicles... I Robot with Will Smith is closest I can remember with that kind of cars...
@@jonathanweimane6926 - and they're still faulty to environment factors. Cameras are not 100% reliable in all conditions, and as others point out, this is about the future of transportation. In the future, cars will not just drive related to what they see, they will actively communicate with other cars around them to increase autonomous swarm mind. This will mean that if one car senses an obstruction or road hazard etc, it will communicate it to all cars around it so every car can be proactive on the road instead of reactive like they are now. This will also allow for high density commuting systems where cars can drive in a collective flow and just link in-and-out when needed, as all other cars will communicate their speed and position and keep the required distances to all other vehicles and give room wherever it's needed, all on their own. That's the level 5 autonomous driving that will come in the future.
Even not all EE do RF. You can design a pretty amazing switching power supply without understanding how to get a cell phone to do receive bandwidth data.
@@Willam_J PLEASE watch The Thought Emporium's video on those bracelets! They're NOT just a neat con, a lot of them tested positive for Thorium powder! Considering her proximity to nuclear tech she should be able to appreciate how bad that is. I urge everyone to watch The Thought Emporium's video on balance-wear and Veritasium's video on "negative ion" woo woo. Both reputable scientists and the videos check out in the fact department. And get that trash out of your house !!
I'm glad you pointed out that HSPA is 3G. USA consumers have been mis educated by the mobile network operators that HSPA is 4G but that's so wrong. 4G is LTE only.
u have LTE which doesnt meet al the specifications for 4G, so they named it to 4G LTE, and later came LTE-A (advanced) which is even closer to speeds of ``original``4G. Just droping some info 1y later🤣
@@christ347 Correlation does not equal cuasation. A guy with a meter does not qualify his story. Is his meter calibrated? is the cellphone tower REALLY too low? Did the exposure cause breast cancer? All very technical questions to be left to the experts to answer. I'm sure the contractors installing these towers have considered all of this. They have to build their towers to a design specification. That specification is decided by some team of highly educated people either nationally or internationally. It would tell you everything about how tall a tower needs to be and all risks involved with 5G. I'm sure that some companies may break the rules sometimes, but that is an outlier. A few videos of a guy with a screeching meter does not prove that 5G is hurting anyone in a meaningful capacity.
zenv I’m always connected via Ethernet on premium internet service on the east coast. It’s not me. Every other P2P game is serviceable at least, Smash is just atrocious. A dice roll of whether you’ll get anywhere from 12-40+ frames of input lag on an already inexcusable 6 frames by default. Melee netplay is far better and it’s using a twenty year old game.
8:35 "Magic or math, I don't know" precisely what I answered my professor when I was asked about OFDM in the corresponding electrical engineering exam.
Yeah like wtf was that real engineering? Please explain! Theres no such thing as magic were not living in the 1600s people... we all know that magic is bullshit and doesnt exist
Nobody pays attention lol. Kids always complain about how school never teaches anything useful (like taxes or how to get a job) but the schools DO teach these things, it’s just the kids don’t pay attention. Too busy vaping, or on their phone.
@@alimc1867 I think part of that problem is in schooling tbh. Decent teachers can teach the average child. I'm getting into the weeds here but societal priorities should be providing basic housing and sanitation, education, nutrition and health care. A child who is housed, well fed and educated and taken care of medically they are more likely to be functional humans.
Ever since I upgraded to 5G my wifi has been cutting out repeatedly. This of course has nothing to do with the fact that the whole country is staying at home all day on their computers, I know it was the lizard people.
Just to clarify, 5GHz on your router is not the same as 5G as in 5th generation (what this video is about). The home router has both 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz frequency bands and the 5GHz band doesn't go through walls and travel as far. If you're not close to your router, the 2.4GHz band is usually better for wireless.
11:08 - this image is from the Parang mountains in Romania (the place where I grew up). I know nobody cares, but it made my day! I miss my childhood home so much!
I'm glad I saw this comment it made me smile. When I see "stock footage" from areas I know it makes me happy as well, and reading your comment made me realize other people experience that too. Thank you :)
@@DavidHRyall So, like the Sun? We are literally bombarded with all sorts of non-ionising radiation from the Sun everyday, which is far FAR more powerful than anything our teeny tiny human-made towers can make.
@@DavidHRyall apply sunblock regularly and go stay in the sun for the summer. Do you feel any problems (oh BTW, 5g doesn't emit uv radiation)? There you have your constant exposure to non-ionizing radiation.
@@DavidHRyall nothing noticeable would happen, non ionising literally just means it isn't energetic enough to ionise the atoms in your body, if it can't do this it can't hurt you.
You didn't address the most pressing question people have with 5G: How does the RF affect the individual, not from the transmission towers, but when the phone itself is parked next to your head?
the 11 to 6 inch wave length of 4 or 5G vs the largest cell that can be present in any human body , the single cell released from the ovary every month in a woman has a diameter of .1mm & as a wavelength that is 3 Terahertz or 1000 times higher than any wifi or 3G & still to big for any nerve, neuron, cell, dna or molecules in your head & SO generally RF can NOT affect an individuals head in any way that passes a double blind test
It’s nice to see a video that actually explains what’s going on. All other videos about the topic are just saying “we are all gonna die, gamma rays!” Or, “you’re an idiot if you think this is gonna kill you” nobody explained why, so thank you for giving me an explanation I can finally try to calm down my parents
The safety of 28ghz for humans is not understood enough to implement 5G. This study compiled all of the studies of the safety for 6-100ghz and determined that the know of safety is inconclusive: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6765906/ ... and all it takes is a simple internet search to find the many articles about cell towers being removed around schools because the school had higher than normal cancer rates, and searching about the cancer rates of people who are closer to cell towers. These incidences show correlation between disease and cell phone towers. Here is an article from a UC Berkeley scientist that shows the many adverse health affects demonstrated in biological organisms when they are exposed to cell tower radiation: uhs.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/cellphonescelltowerswirelesssafety.pdf ... The claims that 5G is safe enough to implement 13,000,000 towers across the US is not empirical. The safety of people is not something that should be overlooked. This video is ignorant.
if we would of had analogue technology instead of retarded digital, we wouldnt need crazy fast oscilation to transmit vast amount of data. You people are just really stupid
@@_a_5494 Well i do hope so we come back to reality and continue with Nikola Tesla technology so we can put away oil and batteries and get electricity everywhere.
Yeah man, look at these studies done on how crazy things people start to believe... www.5gspaceappeal.org/s/International-Appeal-Stop-5G-on-Earth-and-in-Space-37gc.pdf
@@lorrainegatanianhits8331 So, Any plan on getting rid of all your electronics anytime soon? I'd very happily take them from you, They also emits EMF you know?
yes, the plan has worked .if the government switched off all the street lights people would be enraged . Just let the population destroy all the street lights and the government gets off blame-free lol
An important tip from someone who has spent years trying to combat disinformation and bleeding heart contrarian conspiracy theorists; Putting "lunatic" in the intro as your description of "them" is a sure way to make their beliefs stronger and for those conspiracy ideas to spread further. Large amounts of the population, probably the majority of people. Feel marginalised and looked down by snooty graduates, intellectuals and moral ideologues. The vast majority of humans on the planet , inclusive of those with STEM education, would not be able to tell you how we are certain the earth is round, why humans definitely landed on the moon, why vaccines are definitely safe and almost every established fundamental of the scientific world view. Humans rely on trusting others as a shortcut for information and facts to guide their beliefs and therefore lives. When not even most of those with advanced stem education would not be able explain cellular EM transmissions and how they definitely do or do not affect human biology. The rest of the human population will definitely have no clue. Humans and all creatures are supposed to be suspicious of new things, 5G or even 1G is essentially impossible for most laypeople to understand. Even if the reason for that is that they don't have the motivation to learn. So most people are already built to be suspicious, they are also built to have a strong tendency to mirror the beliefs of people around them, especially those most alike them. Those part of their "tribe" that look and speak like them and show them respect. Any kind of "othering" of people immediately turns them into your tribal enemy. A rare 5G phobic who was totally receptive to learning would immediately feel insulted and attacked , therefore clutching to their existing belief even stronger. Another tip for educating people whom you know have erronous beliefs, is to incorporate as much information and facts into your explanations that they ALREADY know or believe to be true. Only 10% of what you tell them at most should be new conflicting information. Anything more than that and you will be one of "them", definitely not to be trusted.
This video isn't for those idiots. They'll never change their minds no matter what. This is for people who just don't know what 5G is and want to understand what all the fuss is about.
Wow man this is really well put. It's as if you've taken the time to understand some human psychology around bias and fundamental human nature. Fascinating.
Even though thats true, sometimes you need to put people in their place. You can only learn and grow if you are humble. For those people, acting without understanding the consequences of their actions, or unwillingness to learn about the subject matter only shows how arrogant they are. They are ignorant, but their arrogance is what gives them the confidence boost to take matters into their own hands, and then they destroy 5G towers, protest outside of Abortion clinics, and protest against the lockdown in place to prevent the spread of COVID 19. Even if you approach them with intentions of hosting a proper discussion, Vast Majority of them will stick to their beliefs, because their lack of humility. You can watch Various discussions about these conspiracy theorists and actual scientists on Jubilee, a channel which hosts these discussions and see for yourself.
I only believe what is proven by countless studies and what makes sense to me, as a student of science. www.reddit.com/r/Electromagnetics/wiki/index Linked is a list of more than a thousand independent reviewed and published studies proving the harms of non-ionizing radiation. This outnumbers the amount of studies *released by telecom companies advertising their products* by several hundreds. Thinking rationally and not being spoonfed information by, again, telecom companies does not automatically make me have trust issues or whatever else you are saying. No, neither I nor anybody else believes the red herring that 5G caused coronavirus. If you are willing to have a discussion, then go ahead, I don't bite. It's okay if you don't, but please take some time out of your day reading some of these studies, and formulate your own opinion.
But government only approve it, it's telecommunications operators who want it, in direct response from us, the public, who want better web browsing on our tablets and phones. It's the laughing stock luddite dim twits who are the tiny handful who think governments are pushing this. They're not. They'd be protesting about crochet being a conspiracy if they couldn't find something else. Sad twats with no life and little brains.
Has anyone ever thought as to why we have governments in the first place? Also does anyone ever think, shit we have a upside down world in terms of values in conjunction with rational? Answer PEOPLE DON'T FUCKING THINK!
Actually it's not only that, but you can actually see every mayor pandemic had a new radio technology introduction. And it goes even deeper. Sunflares and cosmetic radiation has been correlated with other pests and plagues where human made technology wasn't dominate.
@@ch3ckm4te I've seen graphs that link ice-cream sale rates with drowning rates. now call me a fool but i am skeptical about the link between eating ice-cream and drowning. unless there is something more conclusive something happened when this, i find it unlikely to believe that.
It's true. I do wonder about it sometimes. Remember, previously on Windows 95 we use CDs to transfer data? We sort of 'stamped' the information on a disk film, which is then read using laser in our disk drives. Now, it's all wireless. The data was sent from another part of the Earth and just materialised in our computers. If you think about it, it's does sound like teleportation.
@@limiv5272 To try and expand on the concept of Fourier Transforms without going in to too much detail: Normally when we look at signals, we look at how it changes with time. When we use a Fourier Transform, we apply a fancy equation to the signal and get a "transformed" version. This lets us see how much of the signal occurs at 1Hz, or 3Hz, instead of how big the signal is at 4 seconds or 7 seconds.
@@wkrisz IT'S TO DO WITH THE INSANE WAY THEY TEACH NOW, EVERYBODY GETS TO LEARN WHAT THE DUMBEST KID CAN UNDERSTAND, IV'E JUST HAD THE NEW WAY EXAMS ARE GRADED IN THE UK, THEY CHANGED FROM A TO F TO 1 TO 9, 9 BEING THE HIGHEST GRADE, IN THE OLD SYSTEM 'A' WAS THE HIGHEST GRADE, IT'S JUST TO GIVE A BETTER APPARENT GRADE TO THE DUMB TWATS. OS SO THEY THINK, IF IT IS'NT BROKE DON'T FIX IT, PITY THEY DON'T FOLLOW THAT RULE OF COMMON SENSE, AND I KNOW IT'S ALL CAPS, COULDN'T BE BOTHERED TO FIX IT, IT WASN'T broke. lol.
@@wkrisz I've got a question. Why are people so quick to insult other's intelligence on topics they themselves are no better informed? When did "Shut up and accept this as fact" replace critical thinking? Whatever you may think of me, I'm not a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist. I don't know any more than other laypeople about this topic. That doesn't change the fact that a response of "ionizing and thermal are obviously not the only dangers" is a reasonable one. Is 5g dangerous? No idea, but a simple search reveals discussions by research associates claiming a dearth of study into the effects of 5g frequencies on fauna, as well as peer reviewed papers concluding negative, harmful effects from simply increasing the power density of established frequencies such as 3g by as little as 10%. So yea, I'm not blindly accepting Real Engineering's statement that it's "not harmful" when the evidence presented is narrow and incomplete. Pretty sure it's not a crazy-person position to reserve judgement absent all the facts. I'm not jumping on the "it causes COVID-19" train, but I'm still gonna use my brain in lieu of blind acceptance. Edit: In case that made little sense without context, this was one published study I was referring to: The main conclusions from the aforementioned studies are that RF EMFs can be absorbed and can cause dielectric heating in insects and this absorption of RF-EMFs is frequency dependent. This frequency dependency is important since 5th generation (5 G) networks are expected to partially operate at higher frequencies (up to 300 GHz). This shift might induce a change in RF EMF absorption for insects.
@@truantray Who needs math or reading or biology or even basic science when you have freedom, ar-15 and the motherfucking army. Hail trump the god emperor! /s
It is never really taught in any comprehensive detail in high school. You'll learn basic things but not a lot. Even then this will be contained to physics and chemsitry classes and many people will not take those anyway.
I've asked 4 water dragons, 9 skinks, a bluetongue, and a frillneck. None of them even knew what the illuminati was. I would have asked the big goanna who comes by cos he seems pretty switched on, but I couldn't catch him.
Julian Kirrin Well that pretty much proves that these lizards are all cooperating since they all seem to be ignorant of the same thing… by simple logic that’s an impossible coincidence!!!! By the way, I have some very small floating rocks for sale that I got from a wooden duck witch.
I was preparing for my data communication exam and came across this video totally randomly. The amount of information it has is equivalent to a whole useless semester course under 15 mins.
They kill thousands of moths of course. They keep people awake and fuck with our circadian cycle. They surely make trouble for any small creatures that use the sun or moon for navigation. Luckily for us that didn't affect our food chain to any noticeable extent. You don't notice any of this so it's fine. For you, street lights only light the street. There is very little research on how much harm streetlights do, but that's just perfect, absolutely perfect. You probably won't notice any harm from any other massive electromagnetic events either, or will be easily fooled into thinking it's caused by a virus or some other nonsense, and that too is perfect.
@@onevastanus I mean believe that I don't care but your life is going to be so much harder than everyone else's just because of your outlook on these things. You'll forever want to find the bad rather than the good and it says a lot about your personality. Street lights are gonna stay and the 5G towers that I have seen you so tirelessly protest are going to be built whether you like it or not. The human race will never advance with people like you shouting loudly and converting the easily swayed general populous over to your side. Street lights may have caused these problems back when they were first made but the animals that use the moon probably no longer live where there are street lights just due to industrialisation etc. Man you just gotta relax stop tearing your hair out about all this. This is the future whether you like it or not
Rich Jageman not only are you not funny, you’re a total moron for believing these cheesy “public service announcements “... not one ounce of critical thinking skills.. absolutely no respect for your ignorance
Here's a fun fact. In the US, the first bit of spectrum made available for 1G cellular was the UHF band previously reserved for television (it became available when people realized that television was moving to cable instead of OTA signals). TV used FM signaling, and that first generation of cellular used FM signaling...so it was possible to pick up and listen to cell phone calls using a TV set! This would be made impossible with the shift to digital, but Congress decided to make it illegal to listen in on cellular calls. I believe this is the only type of transmission illegal to listen to in the US.
I once played on my guitar AMP with some distortion, and could listen to some woman speaking with her daughter about medication. It was like 2-3 years ago, strange things xd
The sun is not on fire. The sun is a helium nuclear process that is much different then fire. It looks like fire because they are both plasmas that emit light.
I finally got my older relatives to stop freaking out about it by pointing out that Tmobile literally uses the same channel as the local PBS affiliate (39), meaning it had been broadcast for most of their life and wasn't anything different
Imagine watching this vid as one of those believers, not googling a single concept mentioned, and then continues to believe it all part of the lizards' plan
@Fallen News Your so called "scientists" cant justify their claims. How about you study the basics: start with waves. What they are and how they work? Then move on to applications: how to generate wave. Next study physics in telecommunications. Then you will understand how mobile network waves are made. See, step by step. Not that hard right? Oh right! It's difficult for you! Because you study non-factual researches without any basis of fundamental physics. Because all you do is just believe what your "scientists" say! Shame on you! Learn from scratch! Learn from basics before you even argue!
I'm in my final year of engineering, and sometimes staying motivated is hard, but your videos always remind me of why I love engineering. Thank you, and keep up the good work!
Milan von Delft Same I get right back to studying after good videos like this. Good luck my fellow engineer. We are scientists to make the world better :)
@@shadoninja its true. Especially in mechanical engineering, they teach you so many different topics. But Its the critical thinking that you have to develop, problem solving, ability to do complex math, and at least the basics of a topic. The rest is done by the employer where they take someone who has a broad range of knowledge and they train them to do what they want done. That's why internships are so important and I too am currently looking for one.
@@ethimself5064 What? I practice amateur astronomy, I'm currently doing a BSc in Astrophysics and the new "Blue" street lights give off a lot more light pollution (basically cancelling a whole portion of the sky for any observations) compared to the old sodium vapour lights.
Next thing that you know they are going to be scared of light, so they just going to hide in their caves, and whenever they see the sun rising they're going to burn up like vampires!
I'm no conspiracy guy or any of that stuff but I will say I have been indirectly involved in helping some of these installs and I have seen them wired up w 4/0 high quality copper. That type of wire can carry waaaaay more current than they would need for normal transmitter operation. So why would they need to ever power them that high????. Just saaaayin lol.
ISP: Installs 5G Tower People: Complain about radiation, headache, fever, and blame Coronavirus on 5G ISP: Dude, wait another couple weeks before writing a complaint, we are not done yet with the power supply.
Here's a video actually showing a EMF meter reading just standing beside a tower ua-cam.com/video/akR3erL1M0I/v-deo.html Dr. Devra Davis (HUJI) 2020 Expert Forum: Wireless and Cellphone Radiation and Public Policy ua-cam.com/video/-AeSoC6la9c/v-deo.html Here you go you moron educate yourself first and stop misleading people with wrong titles for your videos you clickbaiter!!
Aloe Vera more like Volare Via meh not really boomers, the people sharing this bullshit to me on facebook and burning towers are mostly Gen X moms with bob cuts and endless praises to essential oils are their page
Much has changed since my time as an electrical engineering student back in the 1990s. My professor received his PhD in Antenna tech, more specifically "Wave Guide" studies. These frequencies are very very high. It is amazing to watch the evolution from an engineering perspective.
Just because a wizard knows how to use sorcery doesn't it make not magic. Life itself is a miracle no matter how much we know how it works. We as humans don't know how to create it. We can understand or manipulate it, but can we create life from nothing?
Very good video. I am a microwave and telecommunications engineer and I had a good chuckle at you're explanation of OFDM. You were right that it is just a lot of maths.
I have met mathematicians who will try to convince that Everything is just a load of maths. Just don’t let them near a blackboard they will cover it with strange symbols and claim your looking at reality itself and not an abstraction of existence. (I jest but some of the most enthusiastic people I have met are the blue skies thinkers just playing around with stuff to find out how it all works.)
Karen: Tries to cure the coronavirus in her son’s lungs by making him breathe essential oils. Son: *Chokes to death* Karen: The Death Comes From 5G Towers.
I have written a lengthy document that goes through 16 areas of concern related to the rollout of 5G and overexposure to EMFs. The claim that there are only thermal effects from non-ionizing radiation is, simply put, not true at all. Despite what some say, there are in fact a couple of thousand peer-reviewed studies showing significant negative biological effects from exposure to non-ionizing EMFs. You can find links to 8 compilations of studies in the document. When I tried to post links, a longer text and use paragraphs my comment was flagged as spam (because of the settings of the channel owner) and didn't appear for others, so the solution was to post a link to the document in the description of the only video on my channel. Some of the topics / areas of concern: An astounding lack of studies on the health effects of 5G, the studies that has been done show harmful effects - Thermal vs non-thermal effects, studies on EMF-effects on humans, insects, plants and animals - The two biggest studies to date show clear negative effects from exposure to EMFs - The current safety standards - Appeal from 250+ EMF-scientists - Oxidative Stress - Conflicts of interest and other major issues within the agencies that set the standards - Our sweat ducts and eyes may act as antennas for milli-meter waves - Brillouin precursor phenomena - Potential effects of EMF and millimeter-waves on the cells mitochondria - Push for AI integration and IOT - Security and privacy issues
Apparently on some channels, it's possible to post links here in the comment section!
Link to the full document: docs.google.com/document/d/1L9jEFSIUW5S-bsgtFkVaOtOFA-QJSE8x57H8ABkPtNo/edit?usp=sharing Link to the document without introduction and final words (only the list of 16 areas of concern): docs.google.com/document/d/1SNwE8aNbhtIZvsZuWSF_w9UfEXwFGL2vxlnNbr-Al6g/edit?usp=sharing Below you can find the beginning of the document which includes links to 8 compilations and reviews of peer-reviewed studies (each one referencing between 500-3000 studies) showing harmful biological effects from non-ionizing RF-radiation. It's not only about power. There are multiple potential mechanisms of harm. While non-ionizing radiation isn’t strong enough to break chemical bonds, it is proven that low-intensity non-ionizing RF-radiation results in other harmful effects on biological systems. I'm not saying it will kill us all, or something like that, of course not. But it's a slow burn and we should all be mindful of our exposure, just like we should be mindful with too much sugar, carbs, alcohol, PUFAs etc. Stating that it's perfectly safe to expose oneself 24/7 is not very responsible. Also parts of the population seem to be MUCH more sensitive to the frequencies (EHS). We need to balance our time indoors and our use of technology with being in nature, in the sun and walking barefoot / grounding to discharge (where do you feel most at peace, in front of the computer or walking in a forest at sundown?). Much more in the full document, which can be found in the description of the video on my channel. 1. Health Effects of 5G The health effects of 5G have not been studied enough. Actually, they have barely been studied at all and the studies that have been done are far from reassuring. No large-scale studies have taken place before the rollout of the technology. This in itself, is of course completely outrageous. At the very least, it violates basic human rights against mass population experimentation. www.blumenthal.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/at-senate-commerce-hearing-blumenthal-raises-concerns-on-5g-wireless-technologys-potential-health-risks Review some of the studies that has been done on milli-meter waves (the coming frequencies that will be used for 5G) - These preliminary studies show clear adverse health effects: “Preliminary observations showed that MMW increase skin temperature, alter gene expression, promote cellular proliferation and synthesis of proteins linked with oxidative stress, inflammatory and metabolic processes, could generate ocular damages, affect neuro-muscular dynamics.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29402696/
2. Studies on different wireless technologies 2G, 3G, Wi-fi and the radiation from current cell towers etc. have been studied to different extents (see point 3 below) with very mixed results. There is currently no clear scientific consensus as claimed by certain regulatory bodies. As with scientific research on other environmental pollutants, EMF research is complex and contains inconsistencies; some studies show very significant negative effects while others are showing no effects, depending on what kind effects were being studied. 4G on the other hand hasn’t been studied very much at all (!) and with 5G “we are flying blind”. Excerpt from Scientific American, “we have no reason to believe 5G is safe”: “Since 5G is a new technology, there is no research on health effects, so we are “flying blind” to quote a U.S. senator. However, we have considerable evidence about the harmful effects of 2G and 3G. Little is known of the effects of exposure to 4G, a 10-year-old technology, because governments have been remiss in funding this research.” blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/
3. Thermal Effects vs Non-Thermal Effects - Studies on EMF-effects on humans, insects, plants and larger animals The claim that there are only thermal effects from non-ionizing radiation is simply put, not true at all. Despite what some say, there are in fact at least a couple of thousands peer-reviewed studies from credible sources showing significant negative biological effects of non-ionizing RF-radiation.
On this website you can find a very good summary of much of the research that has been done, I highly recommend checking it out: ehtrust.org/science/research-on-wireless-health-effects/ ehtrust.org/scientific-research-on-5g-and-health/ One of the best papers written arguing against 5G, by ORSAA - Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association (ORSAA): ORSAA submission to ICNIRP - “Inquiry into 5G mobile telephony” www.orsaa.org/uploads/6/7/7/9/67791943/orsaa_submission_to_5g_inquiry_oct__2019_final_v2.pdf ORSAA database with more than 3000 studies: n431.fmphost.com/fmi/webd#Research_Review_V4
Link to more than 500 peer-reviewed studies showing harmful health effects and biological effects: drive.google.com/file/d/19CbWmdGTnnW1iZ9pxlxq1ssAdYl3Eur3/view
An evaluation of 2266 studies from one of the world’s oldest and most well-known general science journals showed that 68,2% of the studies demonstrated significant biological or health effects: “A recent evaluation of 2266 studies (including in-vitro and in-vivo studies in human, animal, and plant experimental systems and population studies) found that most studies (n=1546, 68·2%) have demonstrated significant biological or health effects associated with exposure to anthropogenic electromagnetic fields." www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3/fulltext
Appeal to stop 5G on earth and in space, with links to a couple of thousands of studies on health effects and effects on insects, plants and animals: www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal#fn10b New Hampshire Report (Nov. 1 2020) - Documents Scientific Evidence That Questions the Safety of 5G “President of the Senate Donna Soucy summarizing its findings that safety assurances for 5G have “come into question because of the thousands of peer-reviewed studies documenting deleterious health effects associated with cellphone radiation exposure.” “The report referred to the FCC as a “captured agency with undue industry influence,” citing the Harvard Press Book “Captured Agency: How the Federal Communications Commission is Dominated by the Industries it Presumably Regulates,” which compares the wireless industry to the tobacco industry.” “The FCC and FDA did not respond to the Commission’s request for testimony, and the FDA did not fully answer the Commission’s questions. The National Cancer Institute response to the Commission was that NCI does not make safety recommendations or issue guidelines and is not aware of any federal agency mandated to ensure wireless signals are safe for trees, plants, insects or birds. The New Hampshire 5G Report contains an extensive list of research studies, medical organizations and scientists in support of calling for a halt to 5G. “ www.gencourt.state.nh.us/statstudcomm/committees/1474/reports/5G%20final%20report.pdf Dr. Martin Pall’s (Professor of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences - Washington State University) - Compelling Evidence for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them www.radiationresearch.org/research/dr-martin-palls-latest-compilation-of-emf-medical-research-literature/ Prof. Martin Pall - Cellular Effects of Wi-fi and 5G (feb. 2019) ua-cam.com/video/bsaB7ewFsN0/v-deo.html&feature=emb_title Dr. Devra Davis - 5G, Wireless Radiation and Health: A Scientific and Policy Update (feb. 2020) ua-cam.com/video/-AeSoC6la9c/v-deo.html
Continuation of the document: 4. The current safety standards The current safety standards are based on industry modelling involving the head of a 100KG US Male (that is representative of 3% of the population only) who uses the phone for only 6 minutes. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.4218/etrij.2018-0231 Meet the dummy: www.wearenotsam.com/ 5. The two biggest studies to date show clear negative effects Two of the biggest studies to date show clear evidence of harmful effects from EMFs, but for some reason (…) the FDA downplayed the results using arguments that don’t hold up to scientific scrutiny. Mainstream media reported only one side of the story and didn’t publish the thorough reply from the scientists. www.niehs.nih.gov/news/newsroom/releases/2018/november1/index.cfm ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/topics/cellphones/index.html
Here is a link to all arguments against the study thoroughly answered: ehtrust.org/science/myth-vs-fact-national-toxicology-program-cell-phone-cancer-study/ “The US NTP results combined now with the Ramazzini study, reinforce human studies from our team and others providing clear evidence that RF radiation causes acoustic neuromaa (vestibular schwannoma) and gliomas, and should be classified carcinogenic to humans.” Article about the NTP-study: www.jrseco.com/can-cell-phone-radiation-cause-cancer-yes-says-ntp-rat-study/ “I would argue that the NTP warning was the most important RF-health development not only of 2018, but of the decade and most likely of the new millennium. Yet the expert panel chose to ignore it.” “There is a discussion of the NTP findings in last year’s Swedish (ICNIOR) update. But that was based on an earlier NTP draft where the staff had opted for a weaker designation, “some evidence” of cancer. Later, after an in-depth public peer review, the NTP strengthened the conclusion to “clear evidence” of cancer. That was the headline news of 2018. “Clear evidence” was a game changer; leaving it out of the annual update is a sure sign of bias. The NTP conclusion was now qualitatively different from the earlier draft -it could well have been the title of the panel’s 2018 update. But van Rongen, Röösli and the others ignored it.” microwavenews.com/news-center/time-clean-house
6. Appeal from EMF-scientists More than 250 EMF-scientists have signed an appeal and sent it to the UN calling for, among other things, a revision of the current international guidelines regarding EMFs. “The International EMF Scientist Appeal serves as a credible and influential voice from EMF (electromagnetic field) scientists who are urgently calling upon the United Nations and its sub-organizations, the WHO and UNEP, and all U.N. Member States, for greater health protection on EMF exposure.” www.emfscientist.org/ “The scientists who signed this appeal arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of nonionizing radiation. They have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals.” blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/ 7. Potential conflicts of interest and other major issues within the agencies that set the standards The scientists within the organizations that inform the current standards, argue that they are enough and say that there is no reason to believe 5G causes any harm (without pointing to any studies to back it up) are in comparison very few. What is called “global consensus” is in fact only “ICNIRP-consensus”. “ICNIRP is a German-registered association which, soon after its inception in 1992, became the actual standard-setter of radiation limits. Most European governments - and WHO, the World Health Organization - refer to ICNIRP’s guidelines in their national radiation exposure limits.” There are some very significant issues within these organizations: - The members of these organizations are a very close-knit group as can be seen here: www.kumu.io/Investigate-Europe/the-scientists-and-the-organisations#conflict-of-interest - There is no representation of any scientists that raise concerns about EMFs - All of them are appointed internally “ICNIRP is not open to any professional interested. Members of its scientific committee are appointed. None who claims there is sufficient scientific material to lower safety standards are represented.” - There seems to be a conflict of interest among some of its members: 98-page report from two members of the European Parliament, Klaus Buchner and Michèle Rivasi: “The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: Conflicts of interest ,corporate capture and the push for 5G” klaus-buchner.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ICNIRP-report-FINAL-19-JUNE-2020.pdf “This report deals with an issue of which the importance cannot be overrated: the possible health effects of Radiofrequency Radiation (RfR) or electro magnetic fields (EMF); It deals more specifically with how the scientific debate has been hijacked by corporate interests from the Telecom industry.”
Dariusz Leszczynski, PHD, DSC writes:
“In my two blog posts, ‘ICNIRP did it again…’ and ‘Mike Repacholi responds to ICNIRP did it again…’, I presented several reasons why the current modus operandi of ICNIRP is prone to provide unreliable and skewed evaluation of the scientific evidence on EMF and health. I was strongly opposed by Mike Repacholi, Chairman Emeritus of the ICNIRP, scientist who is responsible for the “birth” of this organization.
In my opinion the major problems of ICNIRP are: - it is a “private club” where members elect new members without need to justify selection - lack of accountability before anyone - lack of transparency of their activities - complete lack of supervision of its activities - skewed science evaluation because of the close similarity of the opinions of all members of the Main Commission and all of the other scientists selected as advisors to the Main Commission.” betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2016/04/08/is-icnirp-reliable-enough-to-dictate-meaning-of-science-to-the-governmental-risk-regulators/
Recent article by Darius Leszczynski, from September 2020: betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2020/09/08/leszczynski-there-is-something-utterly-wrong-with-the-icnirp-membership/
The organization that the US FCC base their recommendations on: “The IEEE-ICES is a slam-dunk case for the conflict-of-interest.” “The safety limits developed by IEEE-ICES are designed by engineers working for the wireless telecommunications industry. Voting in this group on proposed safety limits is just a sham because telecom engineers vote on proposal prepared by the same telecom engineers. The telecom engineers always have the majority within IEEE-ICES. So, how trustworthy are these safety limits? In summary, IEEE-ICES safety guidelines are prepared by industry engineers and approved by industry engineers who later implement them in their own industries as reliable and solely science-based and industry-independent safety guidelines.” betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2020/04/08/pall-firstenberg-and-the-silent-enablers-are-responsible-for-the-current-5g-storm/ More resources about how industry funding influence research on RF-radiation and concerns about ICNIRP, FCC and the FDA: “Scientific analyses show industry funding can and does influence research on radiofrequency radiation. Please take the time to review these studies and to review the documentation provided by experts. This webpage has published citations on the influence of industry and vested interests.”: ehtrust.org/science/research-industry-influence-emfs/ “Some researchers have tried to study how conclusions on EMF radiation and health correspond with source of funding. In at least three such exercises by different people, in 2006, 2007 and 2017, the pattern was the same: The likelihood that industry-funded studies would find cause for concern, was dramatically smaller than in studies that were not industry-funded.” www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1797826/ www.seattlemag.com/article/uw-scientist-henry-lai-makes-waves-cell-phone-industry www.orsaa.org/latest-news/is-icnirp-a-closed-club ”Doubt is our product since it is the best means of competing with the “body of fact” that exists in the minds of the general public. It is also the means of establishing a controversy.” Tobacco executive (22) in Doubt is Our Product by David Michaels” mdsafetech.org/problems/industry-influence-in-science/ I suggest that you read some of what’s been referenced above and decide for yourself if the whole world should trust these people blindly without question and base their decisions about such an important issue based solely on their recommendations. Remaining topics in the full doc: 8. Oxidative stress 9. Effects of milli-meter waves and other types of EMFs on the environment, ecosystems and animals 10. Our sweat ducts and eyes act as antennas for 5G-radiation 11. Brillouin precursor phenomena 12. The role of polarization in the biological activity of EMFs 13. Brain cancer 14. Effects on the cell’s mitochondria 15. Artificial Intelligence, IOT, social crediting system etc. 16. Security and Privacy issues with 5G and IOT 17. Legal Actions
Dr Jack Kruse M.D. is a Neurosurgeon and Quantum Biologist. This mini lecture will help you understand the electrical properties of your eyes and brain. ua-cam.com/video/d7qjh4BIGbc/v-deo.html
@@charlessears6597 said: "Dr Jack Kruse M.D. is a Neurosurgeon and Quantum Biologist. " Already I smell BULLSHIT. "Dr." Jack Kruse may have been a neurosurgeon at one time, but after a fairly shallow dive on Google, all I can find are sites where he's promoting himself, *AND* a myriad of health products he sells. I guess as "CEO" of "Optimized Life, a health and wellness company", that's his job. It's kind of pathetic that a "CEO" has to resort to Patrion as a way to make money. One would think that such an "expert" would have NO problem earning a decent living, *especially* with such notable achievements as "biohacking water" and encouraging people to eat "an electron dense diet" becasue "we're DESIGNED for it". Yes, he ACTUALLY said that. jackkruse.com/emf-4-why-might-you-need-carbs-for-performance/ There TONS more coverage of his quackery here: carbsanity.blogspot.com/search/label/Jack%20Kruse%20Quackery But the pseudoscientific BULLSHIT doesn't stop there! "Our body works apparently on electricity and frequencies of light!" yourfunctionalmedicine.com/jack-kruse-how-electrons-impact-our-lives-produce-magnetic-fields-and-fry-our-laptops/ There was the HILARIOUS account of Dr. Quack getting kicked off a cruise ship for TERRORISM when some enemy he's made on Twitter misattributed a quote to him. nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2012/05/09/us-surgeon-booted-off-of-cruise-ship-accused-of-sending-terrorist-tweet/ Apparently he's pissed a LOT of people off being an asshole on some football forum under an assumed name. Of course he did NOTHING to cover his tracks, and the forum members doxxed him. Here's a pretty good blog dedicated to exposing his (and other FRAUDS) antics: paleodrama.tumblr.com/post/29711905873/so-were-you-behind-shitkrusesays-on-twitter-and It's not a surprise his name is being bandied about here. He's joined in the the 5G quackery by claiming that "TECHNOLOGY USE CAUSES HYPOXIA IN HUMANS". Of course where else does such "genius" publish such an important revelation? On Linked in of course! www.linkedin.com/pulse/technology-use-causes-hypoxia-humans-jack-kruse?articleId=6639914368702177280 Now about this claim that he's a "Quantum Biologist", it's BULLSHIT too. As a discipline, it's VERY new, and it doesn't involve ANY of the things that Dr. Quack claims it does. Plus there's literally NO institution in the US that has a degree program confirming such a title. How new is it? Well, if you Google "Quantum biology" (quotes included), you don't even get 20,000 hits. Worse yet, the top hits are all sketchy anonymous Wordpress blogs. Literally EVERY other hit on the front page is equally as sketchy. All you've PROVEN is that suckers like you are born every minute.
yeah its not that bad 5G it only killed 5 kids and a teacher in a school in the usa brain cancer so they took the tower down so maybe its not that bad 26.000 scientists tried to stop it but thats not alot is it really. they used to use 5G on the ira and the women at greenham commen new clear bomb protesters
and what's the story about how at some point it was faster to tie a flashdisk to a carrier pigeon than it was to upload and transfer a large file over the interwebs?
My issue with 5G is the beamforming. That gives the operators 24/7 tracking on your location with GPS accuracy or better. This is a massive privacy issue. And it's not conspiracy theory.
And there are eyes on our money, too! OMG, the money is spying on us!!!! This is just the government taking control over our minds!!!! Can't even trust dollar bills anymore!!! /s
@rrobertt13 Yeah because warning for epileptic seizures is "everything under the sun". No wait that's quite literally the most common and most important warning forms of video media provide.
I have been working on the wireless telecommunications field for 5 years and on my engineering degree for 3, and not once has any of the frequencies I've used caused me any damage (using 700MHz, 2.4GHz, 5GHz, 11GHz, 24 GHz, and early 60GHz). I can't believe people just blindly say something is bad without research and propper knowledge. Thank you for creating this!
@@iflax7460 Even if it were true that RF from using a mobile phone handset MIGHT - like many environmental substances, food, plastics and so on - cause cancer, how does that mean that 5G is anything to do with Covid/Corona infection? And, when the WHO published that 'possible' opinion in 2011, there WAS no 5G. And what further evidence of 'possible carcinogenicity' of RF has emerged in the NINE YEARS since the WHO claim? NONE!.Your argument proves NOTHING!!!
People fear what they do not understand, and 5G looks different to them. Nonetheless, it still hard to believe that in the age of internet people would go and burn towers.
Because people are not educated properly, or outright stupid/ignorant. That's why nuclear power is such a taboo too. Most people are intimidated by stuff they don't understand, some of us are facinated by it.
I love it more when they try to convince me that 5g causes covid19 and the vaccine has nano particles that will interact with the 5g to control the mind . I'm not even joking .
@@maclester5531 would be sick if that was true. My favorite is the microchip one. Like, these people think that modders wouldn't try to change that so they can get an LSD high?
Yes, the title is intended to draw in the conspiracy theorists. Clickbait for the greater good. While you are here, Real Science just released a fantastic video on the challenges surrounding Covid-19 testing. It taught me a lot about how viral tests work and why we are struggling to keep up: ua-cam.com/video/-DTcZnHHTA8/v-deo.html
Real science isnt always correct, or honest. No safety studies have been done on %G tech , and its effects on hu,man cells and health. I dont trust big business and I especially dont trust scientist who specialize in only 1 area.
worth it
The Ireland Simpsons Fans banter is worth it though
Parish Bananarific there is no proof it causes virus
Your opening statement in the video is correct. I just have to claim you're just in the pocket of big data or just not awake and to them all arguments following that are just fake news. Confirmation bias is a bitch.
Fun fact: When street lamps were introduced, people opposed them because they thought they would cause madness.
How times have('nt) changed.
Kristoffer Johnsen fun fact: funct is short for fun facts.
I mean, have you seen a normal person under a street light? They get freaky
@@banktella1537 Funct = function, stop being a moron.
@@randomuser5443 I've seen two people under a street light and they were indeed freaky
@@_PatrickO learn to take a joke
"Every day technologies [like this] can seem like magic until you peel back the layers to their earliest iteration and see that they are just the product of many years of problem solving with each successive generation adding more complexity."
This says a lot about why some people are afraid of technology. Knowledge helps us not be afraid! Thanks for another wonderful video.
Joseph Craven Sadly though some people won’t accept the information because they were informed by and trusted the wrong sources and now they are set on it.
Joseph Craven not such a great quote, that’s also how the nazis came up with nastier and nastier poisons. Can go in both directions
David Ryall The Nazis? Amatuers! The US and Russia took Nazi rocketry and strapped nuclear warheads on top and held the whole world to ransom for decades.
Having worked in the RF field for over 20 years it is my opinion that it is “magic”. It’s like doing math in your head when your teacher wants you to show your work. It’s not real unless someone can see it. A lot of people are just happy that something works; they don’t care why it works. I once had a Colonel ask me why he couldn’t call someone in the States. I explained to him how the sun will disrupt satellite communications because it’s the biggest source of RF. He said I was lazy and to just get it working. So “troubleshot” (read play my Xbox) for about 4 hours until the sun was not overpowering my equipment. We feed him a line about motor calibration and swapping out an LNA.
It's quite interesting how these conspiracy theorist exist basically because of ignorance. Our current technology would look like sorcery to people a thousand years ago and it's understandable, yet there are people ignorant enough about modern7 technology in this very day.
As a lizard person, I am offended by the suggestion that we are somehow responsible for 5g. Lizard People are responsible for LG.
Lol...love it! How do I become one of the lizard people? Is there a ritual to complete? Do I get a class ring or certificate of completion?
@@ericwiese7479 Its called being born as a lizard person, Jesus. You can't just become one,its either you are or arent
@@SmokeWiseGanja Even more interesting than the anal probes is the fact that an alien decided on the name "SmokeWise Ganja". :P
I'm a reptilian and I find this comment to be offensive!
repiltaphobia is just wrong.
Finally, someone brave enough to speak out about the danger of street lights! :)
...he is not the Messiah, he's a naughty naughty boy!
can we talk about the obvious danger of oxygen, it is a scientific fact that everyone who has ever breathed oxygen is dead or will die in the future
Street lights are only hazardous if your an Astronomer whom wishes to see clear observable skies without city street sulfur lamps affecting their viewing for astrophotography.
Other than that you don't wish to be near that same lamp that is broken near you for fear of the shards of glass imploding and fume of sulfur coming your way.
@@nanochad2979 Oxygen is extremely dangerous! It causes fires, and it destroys valuable infrastructure (steel and reinforced concrete.) It's so reactive that a broad category of chemical reactions is named after it! Eliminating free oxygen from Earth's atmosphere will surely end most of mankind's problems, and in fact many of these will be corrected long before that goal is attained.
The real danger is dihydrogen monoxide. “Chemtrails” are real! Wake up sheeple!!
/s 😉
Some person:
Burns down cell tower. (3g,4g,5g who cares)
Accidentally lights themselves on fire in the process..
Rings for ambulance, What no signal WTF is going on?
See they know, they know!! They are blocking my calls!!!!
It's natural selection at that point
In Russia some people already burned up one 4G tower and 2 weather stations.
It's not like US citizens are drinking bleach to cure covid-19
What about the legitimate studies that say it's potentially dangerous? Also why is this even in my suggestions? This is very suspicious. Just google 5g causes cancer in rats. The national toxicology program concluded that. So make up your own mind. This might be propaganda.
And before people start replying with the other inevitable, it's 1 billion times stronger than any frequencies blah blah..and natural light causes cancer....and it wasn't 5g. Actually, the studies were 4x the legally permitted amount(notice how people will say a thousand times, this is misleading, they are comparing the standard 4x the legally permitted maximum to the lowest amount they subjected a rat featus to, a minisulce amount of RFR) It also doesn't take in to account human error. Output error. Effects on small children or babies. Also. Another thing we will hear is the WHO who classified it as possibly carcinogenic to humans - they'll say it's Carcinogenic 2B. The same as....coffee... possibly dangerous. However Pesticide Drift. Cigarettes. Etc. Have also once had the same classification.
I already know all the replies. It's a shame people can't just accept..it might be dangerous. That's all I'm saying. Might be. Not 100% ....but even 1% chance is too high. Oh and the non ionised RFR argument.... I know it already.
And before you start trying to debunk my automatically assuming they are not legitimate. We are talking about the WHO and NTP, and government programs in Italy, so decide for yourself if you think the top scientists in the world are legitimate or not.
Edit: People are already using the arguments I just debunked. This is such a shame. I don't understand human psychology, I don't get you people. Do you just believe everything you're told, does history set no precedent? Big pharma, corporations, big industry is capable of lying and misleading.
@@wolfman8325 What legitimate studies any links?
“Its the golden age of information, and the golden age of ignorance, intelligence and blatant stupidity go hand in hand”
One would argue stupidity and ignorance were always here, on the same level as today, but we didnt have the possibility to share them.
There was a lockdown during the Black Death Plague. That's how Issac Newton discovered his laws and theories because he was stuck inside. I wonder how half of Europe died...
"I have a foreboding of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time -- when the United States is a service and information economy; when nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries; when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few, and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues; when the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority; when, clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide, almost without noticing, back into superstition and darkness..."
-Carl Sagan
@@fredrik3614 Haven't heard a quote so hauntingly true as this in a while...
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups. The irony is the thing they rail against, some (in this case telecom) tech, they use to propagate their stupidity. We primates are funny creatures, ain't we?
"My first cell phone was the legendary Nokia 3310, which could be used to txt" or as a hammer, brick, paving stone or just about anywhere you needed something indestructible.
@Is me ? What's better, you need a *YELLOW* submarine
..Or in a self defense.
Anyone who calls a phone "legenary" has a serious reality issue....
Somebody once threatened me with a gun for my wallet. They saw that I was carrying a Nokia and decided to hand themselves over to the police.
@@mariusmarius4832 I don't think you understand the legacy of that phone, the damn thing was practically indestructible
We came for information about 5g, but we obtained information for all generations of wireless transmission. I can't complain.
Why no health studies
@@theyredistortingyourrhythm130 Because there's no effect.
@@ryohandokoteh fail
@@theyredistortingyourrhythm130 (sigh)
@@theyredistortingyourrhythm130 Also, this video is all about the engineering behind it, hence the channel's name Real Engineering, and NOT Real Hospital or Health smh.
When Brian McManus says "How? I don't know" means this is reeeeally complicated.
@@Ikbeneengeit electrical and electronic engineer here, i don like maths...
look up on fourier series (it's maths that breakdown a single frequency into multiple frequency) if u understand what i'm talking about
@@covingtonkua9404 I would rather bash my head in the wall
Oliver - 5G is Childs Play.
NextGen TV (ATSC 3.0) in North America is a Completely IP based 4K HDR TV service that is FREE.
NextGen tv uses the SAME 6 mhz Broadcasting Channel as B+W and later Color TV.
and in the 1990's the first American DIGITAL tv was Born.
NextGen tv is a Completely IP based signal from a Tower and from Multiple SIMULCAST towers.
it can deliver 4K HDR Dolby content Wirelessly.
and it can Deliver to Existing 4K tv with a Wireless Gateway Receiver and the Receiver has Both WiFi and a HDMI cable. this means it can Deliver to Smart TV with Wifi or Older TV with HDMI.
and any Wireless Device you own can NOW Receive NextGen tv form the Gateway.
Today there are Already American HDTV with a (ATSC 3.0 ) NextGen Receiver on the market in 2020.
NextGen tv Transmitters are Exceptionally ROBUST and can deliver 4K HDR Inside Homes, Apartments and DEEP into Buildings.
the Future of Wireless is IP based Communications with SIMULCAST Towers.
this includes Public Safety radios , Hospitals, Commerical Radio, and Personal Communications.
Oliver - for more info see - youtube - ATSC 3.0 , what is ?
@@Ikbeneengeit as a communications engineer for 30+ years, it is the only subject other then ancient history that I still study and the only one I actually use in the real world. Math explains everything as well as creating it.
8:32 The magic has a name. It's called Fast Fourier Transform (FFT).
An ancient mathematical transformation that engineers kept dreaming of implementing it in wireless systems.
That dream became reality when semiconductors technology finally enabled it to implemented in HW and integrated into wireless modems.
Imagine: Greeks on the beach thinking about WiFi routers👌🏻
implemented when?
HW = Holy Water?
@@alveolate Hardware
Some people call FFT the most important algorithm ever created, I tend to agree.
I’m an architect who designs telecom infrastructure mainly for Verizon and you’re correct about the fear being high powered 5G antennas. While it’s not the 5G that can hurt you, it’s the large amount of waves from the large LS6 antennas. But, you only have to worry about those if you’re a few feet in front. We do something called an EME report, or Electromagnet Energy report, which is solely to make the site safe for our contractors and owners.
How does a report make something safe?
@@goatsinjay7945 The signal power of any RF signal used for mobile communication, especially in higher 28 GHz frequencies for 5G, drops to a fraction after a few meters in free air. E.g. around 5 millionth after 2 meters for 28 Ghz. During the construction of any tower you calculate the required safety distance and afterwards you measure it for the report. Unless you're standing right in front of the panel antennas, the power that reaches you is tiny. If you do stand in front of the antenna, you are first of all trespassing and most likely climbed up a 30 meter tower.
If you're concerned about the EMF radiation, burning street lights might indeed be the better approach as they might emit some UV. Also you should never expose your skin to the sun light, lots of UV in that
The only negative effect I would think of is the massive environmental damage caused by installing thousands of extra towers and the energy consumed by them while we are trying to go energy efficient at everything else
@@goatsinjay7945
Step 1: Do report
Step 2: Determine if reasonably safe
If safe jump to step 4
If not safe;
Step 3: Change the design/equipment to make it safe and go back to step 1
Step 4: Outline what is and isn't dangerous to the people who will be in the area (set up warning signs around the site to keep people out, tell the people working there how close they have to be for it to be dangerous, fence off the dangerous area, etc.)
Grossly oversimplified, but you get the point, the report doesn't make something safe, it determines what is/isn't safe, how safe/dangerous different things are under different circumstances and how best to ensure safety within reason (within reason meaning people would have to be stupid or go out of their way to be put in danger).
@@12346798Mann you had me right until the end, UV rays from the sun aren’t given the credit they deserve. They’re the saturated fats in the proper human diet world.
"Magic or math or something."
Yep, that just about sums up my understanding of it.
Orthogonal encoding is basically using codes that can be distinguished from each other even when added together.
Like one channel might use 00001111 for 0 and 00110011 for 1, and another channel might use 00101101 for 0 and 01101001 for 1. Because those codes are different enough, even if both are transmitted at the same time on the same frequencies, the computers can still split them apart at the receiver.
The more interesting stuff comes from power division multiplexing, where the channels are distinguished by being high power (for the more distant receiver) or low power (for the closer receiver). This may sound simpler, but it is actually harder to use in practice.
same, and I actually had to deal with the math in uni. it's all only ever explained in heaps and heaps of complex (as in 'a+bi', not as in 'complicated') maths, so no understanding of the mechanics of it all stuck around in my head after the exam.
Abram Thiessen Thank you abram. that was helpful.🙏👍🏻
no, you just sum up the current situation of the American education system.
If there wasn't any health effects caused by non-ionizing radiation and their corresponding electromagnetic fields on biological systems then how come the field of science known as Magnetobiolgy exists and there are thousands of published studies in the field?
Frequencies no one wants to use.
Sad weather radar is sad.
No one mentioned the Ham radio frequencies
Robbie the Robot ham doesn’t operate at gigahertz frequencies
Weather radar is S band.
Nobody wanted mm waves because the hardware was too expensive. It's still expensive, but getting doable.
5G cuts into consumer electronics like wireless microphones and headsets. Many DJ, bands, and announcers using wireless mics have been rendered useless over the last few years due to frequency auctions from T-Mobile and Verizon. Nothing big to those companies, but the small end user gets screwed!
@@robertfleischmann4119 5G doesnt use 2.4ghz that pretty much every wireless things were using?
"Magic or math or something.".
That's the same thing I say when I have to explain my own code changes a few days after I committed them.
Gotta give respect to the coders that can fry their brains with whatever the hell they use to do their digital voodoo.
how does it work?
who knows, but it works goddamnit
so shut up and finish up the frontend
@@aronseptianto8142 are you explaining the whole programmer community?
Bro, same. That feel is universal at this point
Good joke and all, but I wouldn't want to be on your team lol
Small thing, but the production value of rendering a pretty-near photorealistic Nokia screen was a great touch.
Maybe it was really being typed?
"blocked by rain"
That seems like a pretty big problem for self-driving cars...
5G has a lot of frequencies, so it will simply use lower frequencies when needed for range or obstructions like terrain or rain.
IoT sensors are placed on roads and lamp posts
? Tesla uses cameras to drive the car no 5G needed?
@@jonathanweimane6926 next generation of cars that will talk to each other so cars around can now intentions of surrounding vechicles... I Robot with Will Smith is closest I can remember with that kind of cars...
@@jonathanweimane6926 - and they're still faulty to environment factors. Cameras are not 100% reliable in all conditions, and as others point out, this is about the future of transportation. In the future, cars will not just drive related to what they see, they will actively communicate with other cars around them to increase autonomous swarm mind. This will mean that if one car senses an obstruction or road hazard etc, it will communicate it to all cars around it so every car can be proactive on the road instead of reactive like they are now. This will also allow for high density commuting systems where cars can drive in a collective flow and just link in-and-out when needed, as all other cars will communicate their speed and position and keep the required distances to all other vehicles and give room wherever it's needed, all on their own. That's the level 5 autonomous driving that will come in the future.
(When you're a mechanical engineer but you're attempting to speak of EE)
"Its magic"
Even not all EE do RF. You can design a pretty amazing switching power supply without understanding how to get a cell phone to do receive bandwidth data.
kirbythebamf I am a Mechanical Engineer and also a professional Magician. I liked that comment.
I'm fairly decent in both trades, does that then make me a fucking wizard? xD xD xD
I'm IE so it's mostly all magic to me
@@Willam_J PLEASE watch The Thought Emporium's video on those bracelets!
They're NOT just a neat con, a lot of them tested positive for Thorium powder!
Considering her proximity to nuclear tech she should be able to appreciate how bad that is.
I urge everyone to watch The Thought Emporium's video on balance-wear and Veritasium's video on "negative ion" woo woo. Both reputable scientists and the videos check out in the fact department.
And get that trash out of your house !!
Everboy gangsta till the 5G towers starts walkin
I agree. A review of cymatics shows there will be some effect. Frequency and matter. The G is on the way!
5G head
*SIRENHEAD NOISE*
"CONTROLLED OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOR"
I am so old...
I'm glad you pointed out that HSPA is 3G. USA consumers have been mis educated by the mobile network operators that HSPA is 4G but that's so wrong. 4G is LTE only.
Comcast magic
u have LTE which doesnt meet al the specifications for 4G, so they named it to 4G LTE, and later came LTE-A (advanced) which is even closer to speeds of ``original``4G. Just droping some info 1y later🤣
**everyone has been misinformed about 5g - this clip is typical
@@jaixzz your comment is not clear at all about what you think lol
As my father always says, "sometimes you just can't fix stupid"
Exactly. Can't fix stupid.
@@christ347 "information that doesn't fit status quo" is a new euphemism for "batshit crazy conspiracy theory"?
@@christ347 Correlation does not equal cuasation. A guy with a meter does not qualify his story. Is his meter calibrated? is the cellphone tower REALLY too low? Did the exposure cause breast cancer? All very technical questions to be left to the experts to answer. I'm sure the contractors installing these towers have considered all of this. They have to build their towers to a design specification. That specification is decided by some team of highly educated people either nationally or internationally. It would tell you everything about how tall a tower needs to be and all risks involved with 5G.
I'm sure that some companies may break the rules sometimes, but that is an outlier.
A few videos of a guy with a screeching meter does not prove that 5G is hurting anyone in a meaningful capacity.
@@jamesprivet Well you can but eugenics is still a dirty word. Give it another few decades though....
Try information that doesn't fit
The real question:
Will this make smash ultimate online playable?
HA! No.
Okay, but more importantly, can it runs Crysis?
It's surely playable. But the more important factor is price.
You know, since Smash Ultimate works with P2P it's your internet and not Nintendo
zenv I’m always connected via Ethernet on premium internet service on the east coast. It’s not me. Every other P2P game is serviceable at least, Smash is just atrocious. A dice roll of whether you’ll get anywhere from 12-40+ frames of input lag on an already inexcusable 6 frames by default. Melee netplay is far better and it’s using a twenty year old game.
8:35 "Magic or math, I don't know" precisely what I answered my professor when I was asked about OFDM in the corresponding electrical engineering exam.
Did you get through the exam?
Yeah like wtf was that real engineering? Please explain! Theres no such thing as magic were not living in the 1600s people... we all know that magic is bullshit and doesnt exist
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. 😜
@@napzero Especially if you lost the manual! :P
@@ThunderBlastvideo but churches still exist, so........
A lack of decent scientific education in schools is why videos like this are needed.
Nobody pays attention lol. Kids always complain about how school never teaches anything useful (like taxes or how to get a job) but the schools DO teach these things, it’s just the kids don’t pay attention. Too busy vaping, or on their phone.
Especially here in America.
In russia old dumbass grandmas burned one tower already.
The problem is even if it is provided in schools 90% of the students won't pay attention
@@alimc1867 I think part of that problem is in schooling tbh. Decent teachers can teach the average child. I'm getting into the weeds here but societal priorities should be providing basic housing and sanitation, education, nutrition and health care. A child who is housed, well fed and educated and taken care of medically they are more likely to be functional humans.
Ever since I upgraded to 5G my wifi has been cutting out repeatedly. This of course has nothing to do with the fact that the whole country is staying at home all day on their computers, I know it was the lizard people.
People love bringing up lizard people to dismiss anything that threatens their perspective. It's intellectual laziness
I disabled the 5Ghz in my router, wifi sucked and the old protocol is good enough.
It's not the Lizard, they are only responsible for the Corona pandemic
@@themcfaceman Lighten up, dipstick.
Just to clarify, 5GHz on your router is not the same as 5G as in 5th generation (what this video is about). The home router has both 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz frequency bands and the 5GHz band doesn't go through walls and travel as far. If you're not close to your router, the 2.4GHz band is usually better for wireless.
11:08 - this image is from the Parang mountains in Romania (the place where I grew up). I know nobody cares, but it made my day! I miss my childhood home so much!
Very cool
I'm glad I saw this comment it made me smile. When I see "stock footage" from areas I know it makes me happy as well, and reading your comment made me realize other people experience that too. Thank you :)
🇷🇴 🇷🇴 🇷🇴 ♥
Vitalie Iorga Aha so this is the Famous Pula Land
We care!
"Yes, past visible light. Which, last time I checked, no one is afraid of"
basement dwellers: Allow us to introduce ourselves.
Basement dwellers do not introduce themselves tho.
@@patrik5123 h
I mean, I am Irish. I'm not just white. I am translucent.
@@RealEngineering hhhhhhhh
@@patrik5123 They introduce themselves on the internet.
8:33 for those interested the magic is Fourier analysis and electronic filter circuits
thanks!
Did you already know that or looked it up?
@@Benbobr i am a electronics and communication engineer and trust me it is hard af
Why didn't that occur to me! Of course....Fourier series are composed of multiple frequencies
I renamed my wifi to Covid19_5G_test my entire street freaked out.
Oh shit that's funny! Says a lot about your neighbors.
r/firstworldanarchists
Did anyone break into your house and burn your fridge or something yet?
@Dave Pawson I named my original iPhone "DOWNLOADING VIRUS" so that people nearby would get freaked out if they were searching for Wi-Fi signals!
I believe you...
"How? I don't know... Magic, or math, or something..."
...Illuminati confirmed.
Mirdjan Hyle 👁🛕
Mirdjan Hyle yeh it all stems back to these Masonic freaks
Shawn Bird 😂😂👍🏻 love it
Are you on medication 🤦♀️
CORONA - Crown - Head = *MIND*
VIRUS - Air = *FREQUENCY*
BLOOD - Body = *CELL-ular*
5G = *TRANS HUMANISM*
😂🕵️😂 Welcome to Borderless and Cashless World!! 😂🕵️😂
Kinda blew my mind that AM and FM stood for Amplitude and Frequency Modulation, I cant be the only one
Trying not to be rude but it's a shame that you are not.
@Yevhenii Diomidov Ah, good old XKCD.
I think high school science should have covered what AM and FM was when talking about the spectrum. Next lesson, find out what AM and PM stand for.
@Zack Leaf Of course they do and I regret being rude.
"math or magic or something"
Get 3Blue1Brown to take on explaining orthogonal waves.
5G and Covid-19- www.brighteon.com/8bba75a0-5a3b-4727-83e8-ff660a08ec76
@@goognoog392 That's a combination
real engineering: explains 1G
me: hm, okay I think I get it
real engineering: explains 4G
me: wut?
4G is a smarter system operating on a higher frequency with lower amplitude than 1G, making their energy emissions equivalent.
This is hapenning as i'm taking a university class on wireless and networking
J2D2 worth checking into the effects of constant exposure to non-ionising radiation. For my benefit, I have wondered about this for a while 😂🙏
@@DavidHRyall So, like the Sun? We are literally bombarded with all sorts of non-ionising radiation from the Sun everyday, which is far FAR more powerful than anything our teeny tiny human-made towers can make.
@@DavidHRyall apply sunblock regularly and go stay in the sun for the summer. Do you feel any problems (oh BTW, 5g doesn't emit uv radiation)? There you have your constant exposure to non-ionizing radiation.
@@DavidHRyall nothing noticeable would happen, non ionising literally just means it isn't energetic enough to ionise the atoms in your body, if it can't do this it can't hurt you.
that university class should show you many of the small things he gets wrong.
So fakkkeeeee explain to me how my girlfriend got pregnant if i was out of state?!?!?!?!?!
SMS
Oof
🤣
Your cellphone was 9G not 5G..for this she got pregnant!!
Someone found her 5G Spot
You didn't address the most pressing question people have with 5G: How does the RF affect the individual, not from the transmission towers, but when the phone itself is parked next to your head?
same thing
the 11 to 6 inch wave length of 4 or 5G vs the largest cell that can be present in any human body , the single cell released from the ovary every month in a woman has a diameter of .1mm & as a wavelength that is 3 Terahertz
or
1000 times higher than any wifi or 3G & still to big for any nerve, neuron, cell, dna or molecules in your
head & SO generally RF can NOT affect an individuals head in any way that passes a double blind test
Think streetlight and flashlight strapped to your cranium
Radio frequency is nothing compared to the 🌞
It doesn't affect you the waves are too weak to affect anyone
Me: getting terrible grade
Mom: it must be for that damn *5G*
Momma woke
The Cellular went out and I missed a test. She might not be wrong
I thought it's because of video games?
Watch 5G still not be able to fix Ubisoft servers
Those things are toast, bud.
They're probably still running on .5G
CityOS is gonna be real, and our freedom will be compromised
Servers have nothing to do with 5G, one thing, they could make things worse because of faster speeds and more congestion from many people
They suck especially with FIFA 20
It’s nice to see a video that actually explains what’s going on. All other videos about the topic are just saying “we are all gonna die, gamma rays!” Or, “you’re an idiot if you think this is gonna kill you” nobody explained why, so thank you for giving me an explanation I can finally try to calm down my parents
@jocaguz18 Goddam... I completely agree with you... But you could've let him down a bit gentler lmao
Genzia did anyone ever see the video with the birds dead near 5g tower ??
Robert Jafari yeah but that vid is misleading, the birds death had no relation to the tower
trying to do the same thing haha
The safety of 28ghz for humans is not understood enough to implement 5G. This study compiled all of the studies of the safety for 6-100ghz and determined that the know of safety is inconclusive: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6765906/ ... and all it takes is a simple internet search to find the many articles about cell towers being removed around schools because the school had higher than normal cancer rates, and searching about the cancer rates of people who are closer to cell towers. These incidences show correlation between disease and cell phone towers. Here is an article from a UC Berkeley scientist that shows the many adverse health affects demonstrated in biological organisms when they are exposed to cell tower radiation: uhs.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/cellphonescelltowerswirelesssafety.pdf ... The claims that 5G is safe enough to implement 13,000,000 towers across the US is not empirical. The safety of people is not something that should be overlooked. This video is ignorant.
1G- PAGING
2G- CELLULAR COMM
3G- PICTURE MSGS
4G- MASS DATA TRANSFER
5G- YOUR MOM THINKS IM CUTE
Karen: 5G is dangerous!
Also Karen: Why can't Facebook load faster!
Because u are one of the many idiotic pitchfork people
if we would of had analogue technology instead of retarded digital, we wouldnt need crazy fast oscilation to transmit vast amount of data. You people are just really stupid
@@manipulativer What year u living in bro???
@@manipulativer Digital tech allows you to write and post your comment.
@@_a_5494 Well i do hope so we come back to reality and continue with Nikola Tesla technology so we can put away oil and batteries and get electricity everywhere.
One thing I have learned during this pandemic: Never underestimate stupidity.
Yeah man, look at these studies done on how crazy things people start to believe...
www.5gspaceappeal.org/s/International-Appeal-Stop-5G-on-Earth-and-in-Space-37gc.pdf
@@lorrainegatanianhits8331 So, Any plan on getting rid of all your electronics anytime soon? I'd very happily take them from you, They also emits EMF you know?
Lorraine Gata'nian Hits The fact you wear a Philadelphia fusion profile pic disgusts me.
@@FirstNameLastName-wd8gn Guess we gotta go hide in a cave now, at least it'll block out that sunlight💁♀️
@@lorrainegatanianhits8331 You proved me right, my friend. Our expectations for you people were low but holy fuck.
"Last time I checked no one is afraid of visible light" I see your bet and raise you blue light lenses :D
At least it's only the higher frequencies X'D
They can help some people (with dyslexia for example) concentrate on computer screens, so that ones not entirely conspiracy.
Lasers are technically visible 😆
@@xtramoist9999 not the most dangerous ones.
Talking about cops, idiots.
Funfact is that the information would not have reached the opponents of 5g without 4g
@Egon Freeman Let people move away from 5g towers. That would lower prices near 5g towers which means that I can get cheap rent with high speed 😎😎
@@forestreee better yet, just put a tower in your home! Let us know how you feel in a few years
Lets grab some popcorn for the comments incoming.
5G gave me coronavirus cancer aids
LP Pokefan 🙂🍿
Hands down the finest welcoming comment
I'm ready for the Facebook researchers to come in here and say some stupid stuff.
Actually just grab some corn, the 5G *RADIATION* will do the job.
Brilliant. I’m so much more cleverer than I was before I watched theirs video. Now I’m going out to burn down those evil street lights!!
yes, the plan has worked .if the government switched off all the street lights people would be enraged . Just let the population destroy all the street lights and the government gets off blame-free lol
"Radiation is harmful! Now pardon me: I'm going to the beach to lay in the sun for six hours...."
"Solar Not Nuclear" was the hippies bumper sticker in the 70's. The sun is of course a nuclear reaction.
fred Nil to be fair its completely different. The similarity is the rather general term "nuclear" that applies to both.
The rays from the sun are natural and our body has evolved to need them. Microwave technology is alien to our bodies.
That's retarded. We have multiple defenses we have developed through evolution to resist the sun.
James Hrouda Idiot. Microwaves are everywhere.
Any thing that makes Twiter and Facebook easier to receive is bad for mental health.
based
Everybody gangsta till solar storm comes
Or worse, the pole reversal happens😬
Or even more worse where a big bang happens in earth
Or even worse the dajjal appears
Or even worse than anything we all get erased everything in existence
@@abandonedaccountt-t2709 lol it wouldn't matter much then anyways
The real question is, who makes your infographic animations? They're outstanding.
SIMP
Edit for the fools who think I'm serious:
just kidding xD
Yoyoman_ Blue6 weirdo
its mike ridolfi, and here's the animator's website:
www.moboxgraphics.com/
@@danielzavala8014 Joking obviously
SIMP
13:27 "Problem-solving"
Me: let me guess... Brilliant?
Waifu of quality you got there my friend
Bell trialled 1G around Chicago a year before Japan.. if you didn’t bother looking that up it puts the rest of your information in question
Real Engineering tells us why to be afraid of street lights.
Против Глобал they should invent something like a pillow to protect you
Street lights made me gay.
HORSECRAP to equate them
An important tip from someone who has spent years trying to combat disinformation and bleeding heart contrarian conspiracy theorists;
Putting "lunatic" in the intro as your description of "them" is a sure way to make their beliefs stronger and for those conspiracy ideas to spread further.
Large amounts of the population, probably the majority of people. Feel marginalised and looked down by snooty graduates, intellectuals and moral ideologues. The vast majority of humans on the planet , inclusive of those with STEM education, would not be able to tell you how we are certain the earth is round, why humans definitely landed on the moon, why vaccines are definitely safe and almost every established fundamental of the scientific world view.
Humans rely on trusting others as a shortcut for information and facts to guide their beliefs and therefore lives.
When not even most of those with advanced stem education would not be able explain cellular EM transmissions and how they definitely do or do not affect human biology. The rest of the human population will definitely have no clue.
Humans and all creatures are supposed to be suspicious of new things, 5G or even 1G is essentially impossible for most laypeople to understand. Even if the reason for that is that they don't have the motivation to learn.
So most people are already built to be suspicious, they are also built to have a strong tendency to mirror the beliefs of people around them, especially those most alike them. Those part of their "tribe" that look and speak like them and show them respect.
Any kind of "othering" of people immediately turns them into your tribal enemy.
A rare 5G phobic who was totally receptive to learning would immediately feel insulted and attacked , therefore clutching to their existing belief even stronger.
Another tip for educating people whom you know have erronous beliefs, is to incorporate as much information and facts into your explanations that they ALREADY know or believe to be true. Only 10% of what you tell them at most should be new conflicting information. Anything more than that and you will be one of "them", definitely not to be trusted.
Damn bro this is really well said, this is the most sensical comment I've seen yet
This video isn't for those idiots. They'll never change their minds no matter what. This is for people who just don't know what 5G is and want to understand what all the fuss is about.
Wow man this is really well put. It's as if you've taken the time to understand some human psychology around bias and fundamental human nature. Fascinating.
Even though thats true, sometimes you need to put people in their place. You can only learn and grow if you are humble. For those people, acting without understanding the consequences of their actions, or unwillingness to learn about the subject matter only shows how arrogant they are. They are ignorant, but their arrogance is what gives them the confidence boost to take matters into their own hands, and then they destroy 5G towers, protest outside of Abortion clinics, and protest against the lockdown in place to prevent the spread of COVID 19. Even if you approach them with intentions of hosting a proper discussion, Vast Majority of them will stick to their beliefs, because their lack of humility. You can watch Various discussions about these conspiracy theorists and actual scientists on Jubilee, a channel which hosts these discussions and see for yourself.
I only believe what is proven by countless studies and what makes sense to me, as a student of science. www.reddit.com/r/Electromagnetics/wiki/index Linked is a list of more than a thousand independent reviewed and published studies proving the harms of non-ionizing radiation. This outnumbers the amount of studies *released by telecom companies advertising their products* by several hundreds. Thinking rationally and not being spoonfed information by, again, telecom companies does not automatically make me have trust issues or whatever else you are saying. No, neither I nor anybody else believes the red herring that 5G caused coronavirus. If you are willing to have a discussion, then go ahead, I don't bite. It's okay if you don't, but please take some time out of your day reading some of these studies, and formulate your own opinion.
I feel like if government wasnt so shady people wouldnt be this skeptical of new technologies in the first place..
MangoSauce Gaming tru they’d jus end up paranoid
That's what happen to a dog if he stay near 5g:
ua-cam.com/video/lCl7I7png08/v-deo.html
But government only approve it, it's telecommunications operators who want it, in direct response from us, the public, who want better web browsing on our tablets and phones. It's the laughing stock luddite dim twits who are the tiny handful who think governments are pushing this. They're not. They'd be protesting about crochet being a conspiracy if they couldn't find something else. Sad twats with no life and little brains.
it is not shady, just your government it's stupid.
Has anyone ever thought as to why we have governments in the first place? Also does anyone ever think, shit we have a upside down world in terms of values in conjunction with rational? Answer PEOPLE DON'T FUCKING THINK!
How in the world did the "5G causes Covid-19" thing even start?
Because 5g was coming out in wuhan the same time covid started.
@@jontorrie2212 ah, that explains the stupidity a little bit more
Actually it's not only that, but you can actually see every mayor pandemic had a new radio technology introduction. And it goes even deeper. Sunflares and cosmetic radiation has been correlated with other pests and plagues where human made technology wasn't dominate.
@@ch3ckm4te I've seen graphs that link ice-cream sale rates with drowning rates. now call me a fool but i am skeptical about the link between eating ice-cream and drowning. unless there is something more conclusive something happened when this, i find it unlikely to believe that.
@@ch3ckm4te brah new technology is being introduced all the time.
"Sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic"
Sufficiently stupid consider technology as magic, more like!!!
It's true. I do wonder about it sometimes.
Remember, previously on Windows 95 we use CDs to transfer data? We sort of 'stamped' the information on a disk film, which is then read using laser in our disk drives. Now, it's all wireless. The data was sent from another part of the Earth and just materialised in our computers. If you think about it, it's does sound like teleportation.
My MSc in Telecommunication nicely summarised in a beautifully explained 15 minutes video
Sooo can you tell me more about that magic part?
@@limiv5272 FFT = Fast Fourier Transform
@@limiv5272 To try and expand on the concept of Fourier Transforms without going in to too much detail:
Normally when we look at signals, we look at how it changes with time. When we use a Fourier Transform, we apply a fancy equation to the signal and get a "transformed" version. This lets us see how much of the signal occurs at 1Hz, or 3Hz, instead of how big the signal is at 4 seconds or 7 seconds.
Holy fuck you need an MSc to understand this simple thing? Schooling is not what it used to be.
Who skipped straight down to the comments for 5g fights?! 😆
Ooh i've gotten into a few already
Why are there so much people with an IQ below room temperature? (In celsius)
Yeah dude me... The world has gone mad
@@wkrisz IT'S TO DO WITH THE INSANE WAY THEY TEACH NOW, EVERYBODY GETS TO LEARN WHAT THE DUMBEST KID CAN UNDERSTAND, IV'E JUST HAD THE NEW WAY EXAMS ARE GRADED IN THE UK, THEY CHANGED FROM A TO F TO 1 TO 9, 9 BEING THE HIGHEST GRADE, IN THE OLD SYSTEM 'A' WAS THE HIGHEST GRADE, IT'S JUST TO GIVE A BETTER APPARENT GRADE TO THE DUMB TWATS. OS SO THEY THINK, IF IT IS'NT BROKE DON'T FIX IT, PITY THEY DON'T FOLLOW THAT RULE OF COMMON SENSE, AND I KNOW IT'S ALL CAPS, COULDN'T BE BOTHERED TO FIX IT, IT WASN'T broke. lol.
Me
@@wkrisz I've got a question. Why are people so quick to insult other's intelligence on topics they themselves are no better informed? When did "Shut up and accept this as fact" replace critical thinking? Whatever you may think of me, I'm not a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist. I don't know any more than other laypeople about this topic. That doesn't change the fact that a response of "ionizing and thermal are obviously not the only dangers" is a reasonable one. Is 5g dangerous? No idea, but a simple search reveals discussions by research associates claiming a dearth of study into the effects of 5g frequencies on fauna, as well as peer reviewed papers concluding negative, harmful effects from simply increasing the power density of established frequencies such as 3g by as little as 10%. So yea, I'm not blindly accepting Real Engineering's statement that it's "not harmful" when the evidence presented is narrow and incomplete. Pretty sure it's not a crazy-person position to reserve judgement absent all the facts. I'm not jumping on the "it causes COVID-19" train, but I'm still gonna use my brain in lieu of blind acceptance.
Edit: In case that made little sense without context, this was one published study I was referring to: The main conclusions from the aforementioned studies are that RF EMFs can be absorbed and can cause dielectric heating in insects and this absorption of RF-EMFs is frequency dependent. This frequency dependency is important since 5th generation (5 G) networks are expected to partially operate at higher frequencies (up to 300 GHz). This shift might induce a change in RF EMF absorption for insects.
The animation at 10:55 almost made me fall from the chair. I guess this could be actually dangerous for people with epilepsy.
Its amazing how so many people dont understand the electromagnetic spectrum
The US educational system is a joke. They barely know how to read by the end of high school.
@@truantray Who needs math or reading or biology or even basic science when you have freedom, ar-15 and the motherfucking army. Hail trump the god emperor! /s
@@Luna-bf8lf hell yeah brother
It's people from all over the world that believe this crap
It is never really taught in any comprehensive detail in high school. You'll learn basic things but not a lot.
Even then this will be contained to physics and chemsitry classes and many people will not take those anyway.
Actually, 2G is a lot more dangerous than 5G:
Too many people died by aging waiting for a game download
Alessandro - Actually Wireless is completely harmless to Humans and Animals.
as the Invention of the MARCONI Radios have PROVEN.
NOW THEY CAN DIE INSTANTLY ?
Alessandro Bianchi vvvvua-cam.com/video/vbTtGlbfJrI/v-deo.html
😂😂😂
@@markplott4820 didn't get the joke?
My lizard told me he has no plans to take over the world.
I've asked 4 water dragons, 9 skinks, a bluetongue, and a frillneck. None of them even knew what the illuminati was. I would have asked the big goanna who comes by cos he seems pretty switched on, but I couldn't catch him.
Julian Kirrin Well that pretty much proves that these lizards are all cooperating since they all seem to be ignorant of the same thing… by simple logic that’s an impossible coincidence!!!! By the way, I have some very small floating rocks for sale that I got from a wooden duck witch.
jnlwp.defense.gov/About/Frequently-Asked-Questions/Active-Denial-System-FAQs/
@@scotthannan8669 I hear those rocks repel bears, also :D
Oh phew thank God!
I was preparing for my data communication exam and came across this video totally randomly. The amount of information it has is equivalent to a whole useless semester course under 15 mins.
Did you know,
the average human being eats eight 5G towers in their sleep each year.
One Two Woah dude better not tell Karen!
By any chance you watch a particular swedish man with a growing hate for Denmark
I laughed too hard at this.
www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fimgur.com%2Fgallery%2FPoOSrlL&psig=AOvVaw0DyxdHbF2yCWppMaOj1eC0&ust=1589133936537000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAIQjRxqFwoTCNjupbCvp-kCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAE
we can only see 15 Hz of ram anyway
For 6G, you’ll have to live inside a microwave oven
www.5gspaceappeal.org/ www.stopbitburning.com/ Stop Agenda 21 everyone!
Lol
With 6G, everyone gets his own sender.
That’s not far from the truth. It will be like living in a microwave oven 😂
@@NANA-tz7ep ok BOT.
"You might as well be afraid of streetlights". Perfect, absolutely perfect.
Tomorrows headline: "streetlights cause covid"
A lot of people have conspiracy theories around LED street lights so they already are afraid
They kill thousands of moths of course. They keep people awake and fuck with our circadian cycle. They surely make trouble for any small creatures that use the sun or moon for navigation. Luckily for us that didn't affect our food chain to any noticeable extent. You don't notice any of this so it's fine. For you, street lights only light the street. There is very little research on how much harm streetlights do, but that's just perfect, absolutely perfect. You probably won't notice any harm from any other massive electromagnetic events either, or will be easily fooled into thinking it's caused by a virus or some other nonsense, and that too is perfect.
@@onevastanus I mean believe that I don't care but your life is going to be so much harder than everyone else's just because of your outlook on these things. You'll forever want to find the bad rather than the good and it says a lot about your personality. Street lights are gonna stay and the 5G towers that I have seen you so tirelessly protest are going to be built whether you like it or not. The human race will never advance with people like you shouting loudly and converting the easily swayed general populous over to your side. Street lights may have caused these problems back when they were first made but the animals that use the moon probably no longer live where there are street lights just due to industrialisation etc. Man you just gotta relax stop tearing your hair out about all this. This is the future whether you like it or not
Yeah most people do not understand that a TX antenna and a light bulb aren't really that different. Both use AC pushed through a wire.
The original iPhone maxed out 144 kb/s over 2G on AT&T.
Next thing you will say is that the Earth is spherical.
What would you prefer to hear 🤣🤣🤣
I suppose that was a joke with the edgeless eatrh 😂😂😂🙈🙈🙈
@@adi.olteanu.1982 r/whooosh
XD
I agree, the earth is like minecraft, just a bunch of infinite chunks
r/s
Rich Jageman not only are you not funny, you’re a total moron for believing these cheesy “public service announcements “... not one ounce of critical thinking skills.. absolutely no respect for your ignorance
Here's a fun fact. In the US, the first bit of spectrum made available for 1G cellular was the UHF band previously reserved for television (it became available when people realized that television was moving to cable instead of OTA signals). TV used FM signaling, and that first generation of cellular used FM signaling...so it was possible to pick up and listen to cell phone calls using a TV set!
This would be made impossible with the shift to digital, but Congress decided to make it illegal to listen in on cellular calls. I believe this is the only type of transmission illegal to listen to in the US.
We listened to them on our radio between FM 108-110.
I remember being able to hear other people's calls. Very interesting! Thanks!
I remember getting excited about UHF since we could only watch TV on VHF. Technology has developed exponentially.
Not anymore.
I once played on my guitar AMP with some distortion, and could listen to some woman speaking with her daughter about medication. It was like 2-3 years ago, strange things xd
I'm still waiting for the day people start trying to set the sun on fire...
This comment is golden
Obviously that day will never come because the space rocket would burn during the day...it will happen at night....
that night will come.💁😬
Then you'll love this:
ua-cam.com/video/jS_7GYDX8Q8/v-deo.html
The sun is not on fire. The sun is a helium nuclear process that is much different then fire. It looks like fire because they are both plasmas that emit light.
One day may friend...we ll have people shouting things like "sun kills our troops" all around the world...
I finally got my older relatives to stop freaking out about it by pointing out that Tmobile literally uses the same channel as the local PBS affiliate (39), meaning it had been broadcast for most of their life and wasn't anything different
Imagine watching this vid as one of those believers, not googling a single concept mentioned, and then continues to believe it all part of the lizards' plan
ua-cam.com/video/HMccJlNwz9w/v-deo.html
Maybe this will enlighten you
@Fallen News for your consideration, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4629874/
Fallen News found the gullible conspiratard
@Fallen News You've made the claim, now provide the proof.
@Fallen News Your so called "scientists" cant justify their claims. How about you study the basics: start with waves. What they are and how they work? Then move on to applications: how to generate wave. Next study physics in telecommunications. Then you will understand how mobile network waves are made.
See, step by step. Not that hard right? Oh right! It's difficult for you! Because you study non-factual researches without any basis of fundamental physics. Because all you do is just believe what your "scientists" say! Shame on you!
Learn from scratch! Learn from basics before you even argue!
I'm in my final year of engineering, and sometimes staying motivated is hard, but your videos always remind me of why I love engineering. Thank you, and keep up the good work!
Milan von Delft Same I get right back to studying after good videos like this. Good luck my fellow engineer. We are scientists to make the world better :)
I still don't understand how engineering degrees translate into jobs. The study of engineering seems so insanely broad.
@@shadoninja its true. Especially in mechanical engineering, they teach you so many different topics. But Its the critical thinking that you have to develop, problem solving, ability to do complex math, and at least the basics of a topic. The rest is done by the employer where they take someone who has a broad range of knowledge and they train them to do what they want done. That's why internships are so important and I too am currently looking for one.
@@zub41r75 Thanks! Same to you.
13:16 Well jokes on you I AM afraid of street lights.
The light pollution from the new blue ones is so much worse than the old sodium vapour ones :(
ua-cam.com/video/nbRyH6fkee0/v-deo.html
i am afraid of daylight and socializing
@@OCinneide It is in the same frequency range of sunlight - ya afraid of sunlight? If so, find a deep dark cave
@@ethimself5064 What? I practice amateur astronomy, I'm currently doing a BSc in Astrophysics and the new "Blue" street lights give off a lot more light pollution (basically cancelling a whole portion of the sky for any observations) compared to the old sodium vapour lights.
Next thing that you know they are going to be scared of light, so they just going to hide in their caves, and whenever they see the sun rising they're going to burn up like vampires!
Just rename it to 4.1 G and be done with it
Harvard: You want a scholarship?
@@KoolMonkE why are you doing this to humans god?
4.5 g is already LTE
@@dennispremoli7950 4.5.1 then. It's practically a maintenance release anyways
Tbh I think it could have some effect. Like selling things for 99 cents instead of a dollar
10:45 Holy shit, Seizure warning to anyone who is susceptible to that. This started to trigger an ocular migraine...
Thank you!
Did you press pause in time omg
Whoah, I don't suffer from anything that's usually related to these but got damn that made me feel weird quickly.
Some people don't believe what they see, they see what they believe
4 years old : its deep😢
Good point. Or maybe question everything ,like where these people get all the skilled professionals to produce such quality
jnlwp.defense.gov/About/Frequently-Asked-Questions/Active-Denial-System-FAQs/
@@bicyclexx7 Bro, that is a lovely resource. Thank you!
@@neo_tsz please do your homework and spread the truth they are putting weapons on every light Pole. Depending on the people's ignorance
I'm no conspiracy guy or any of that stuff but I will say I have been indirectly involved in helping some of these installs and I have seen them wired up w 4/0 high quality copper. That type of wire can carry waaaaay more current than they would need for normal transmitter operation. So why would they need to ever power them that high????. Just saaaayin lol.
ISP: Installs 5G Tower
People: Complain about radiation, headache, fever, and blame Coronavirus on 5G
ISP: Dude, wait another couple weeks before writing a complaint, we are not done yet with the power supply.
No Kidding, I don't know if you are roasting ISP's or Covid-fakers
@@tylermatzen i think he's roasting both of them
@@koishiinfinity2125 lmao
I think you're right.
Here's a video actually showing a EMF meter reading just standing beside a tower
ua-cam.com/video/akR3erL1M0I/v-deo.html
Dr. Devra Davis (HUJI)
2020 Expert Forum: Wireless and Cellphone Radiation and Public Policy
ua-cam.com/video/-AeSoC6la9c/v-deo.html
Here you go you moron educate yourself first and stop misleading people with wrong titles for your videos
you clickbaiter!!
They should do this more. Place fake 5g everywhere and show them it's all a nocebo.
13:13 don’t even say that, you’ll start some new riot on street lights.
yeah
Don't worry it's already happened
When street lights were first introduced people attacked them because they thought it would turn people mad
@@Alucard-gt1zf people are attacking street lamps again thinking they're 5g towers
Oooh, that would improve my star gazing! Let's do it.
2020 will also be the year of the 5g zombiecalypse wave.
Karens: I’m gonna pretend I didn’t see that...
Not just karens, lots of misinformed boomers out there
Aloe Vera more like Volare Via meh not really boomers, the people sharing this bullshit to me on facebook and burning towers are mostly Gen X moms with bob cuts and endless praises to essential oils are their page
The same kind of people that think vaccines are bad for you
o f f....there is disinfectants in them...and CDC warned US not to inject them in our body!
@o o f, Theres lists of the ingredients of most vaccines... none of them are dangerous
Much has changed since my time as an electrical engineering student back in the 1990s. My professor received his PhD in Antenna tech, more specifically "Wave Guide" studies. These frequencies are very very high. It is amazing to watch the evolution from an engineering perspective.
Lies again? Greatest Of Them Is Real True Anal
Evolution?
Its humanity commiting suicite.
@@rubenrios9113 if you say so
Everybody gangsta till the 5g start walkin
Angrykiwi lmao
Sirenhead's brother Radarhead
@@rg6405 Beat me to it XD
@@rg6405 Antennahead
The last time I was this early Real Engineering was talking about drones in Rwanda
That was a good one... That company, ZipLine, is now contracting with American companies to bring a similar system to rural Americans.
@@William-Morey-Baker Nice of the Rwandans to help out a country in drastic need of development.
(Obvs just kidding, I think ZipLine is based in US)
Hello from Rwanda
“The world isn’t wizard jizz. Technology’s not magic it’s just scientists on acid or applied mathematics.”
I see you Exurb1a fan
That’s definitely exurb1a
Just because a wizard knows how to use sorcery doesn't it make not magic.
Life itself is a miracle no matter how much we know how it works. We as humans don't know how to create it. We can understand or manipulate it, but can we create life from nothing?
Very good video. I am a microwave and telecommunications engineer and I had a good chuckle at you're explanation of OFDM. You were right that it is just a lot of maths.
I have met mathematicians who will try to convince that Everything is just a load of maths. Just don’t let them near a blackboard they will cover it with strange symbols and claim your looking at reality itself and not an abstraction of existence.
(I jest but some of the most enthusiastic people I have met are the blue skies thinkers just playing around with stuff to find out how it all works.)
12:00 "past visible light... which no-one is afraid of"
are you forgetting about vampires?
or sunburn...
@@unoefxz Sunburn is due to ultraviolet light. Which is not in the visible spectrum.
Or skin cancer?
So we should start selling 5G sunscreen? Let's go invent it, we are going to get rich!
smh my head, prayers to all my vampire bros out there
Karen: Tries to cure the coronavirus in her son’s lungs by making him breathe essential oils.
Son: *Chokes to death*
Karen:
The Death Comes From 5G Towers.
lmao, tc
And they blame you for not researching the topic, but linked everything in the description
I got 5G I got asthma
Coincidence?
Yeah absolutely.
Tohtori Vanukas you can’t just ‘get’ asthma is genetic 🤣
I got a flu vaccination and a piano fell on my head.
@@amck1012 asthma is not a genetic disease. Regions of more pollution have higher asthma.
@@truantray its actually both caused by genetic and environmental factors
Amck101 I got asthma after a serious week of the flu, it damaged my lungs now I’m all fucked up
I have written a lengthy document that goes through 16 areas of concern related to the rollout of 5G and overexposure to EMFs. The claim that there are only thermal effects from non-ionizing radiation is, simply put, not true at all. Despite what some say, there are in fact a couple of thousand peer-reviewed studies showing significant negative biological effects from exposure to non-ionizing EMFs. You can find links to 8 compilations of studies in the document. When I tried to post links, a longer text and use paragraphs my comment was flagged as spam (because of the settings of the channel owner) and didn't appear for others, so the solution was to post a link to the document in the description of the only video on my channel. Some of the topics / areas of concern:
An astounding lack of studies on the health effects of 5G, the studies that has been done show harmful effects - Thermal vs non-thermal effects, studies on EMF-effects on humans, insects, plants and animals - The two biggest studies to date show clear negative effects from exposure to EMFs - The current safety standards - Appeal from 250+ EMF-scientists - Oxidative Stress - Conflicts of interest and other major issues within the agencies that set the standards - Our sweat ducts and eyes may act as antennas for milli-meter waves - Brillouin precursor phenomena - Potential effects of EMF and millimeter-waves on the cells mitochondria - Push for AI integration and IOT - Security and privacy issues
Apparently on some channels, it's possible to post links here in the comment section!
Link to the full document:
docs.google.com/document/d/1L9jEFSIUW5S-bsgtFkVaOtOFA-QJSE8x57H8ABkPtNo/edit?usp=sharing
Link to the document without introduction and final words (only the list of 16 areas of concern):
docs.google.com/document/d/1SNwE8aNbhtIZvsZuWSF_w9UfEXwFGL2vxlnNbr-Al6g/edit?usp=sharing
Below you can find the beginning of the document which includes links to 8 compilations and reviews of peer-reviewed studies (each one referencing between 500-3000 studies) showing harmful biological effects from non-ionizing RF-radiation.
It's not only about power. There are multiple potential mechanisms of harm. While non-ionizing radiation isn’t strong enough to break chemical bonds, it is proven that low-intensity non-ionizing RF-radiation results in other harmful effects on biological systems.
I'm not saying it will kill us all, or something like that, of course not. But it's a slow burn and we should all be mindful of our exposure, just like we should be mindful with too much sugar, carbs, alcohol, PUFAs etc. Stating that it's perfectly safe to expose oneself 24/7 is not very responsible. Also parts of the population seem to be MUCH more sensitive to the frequencies (EHS).
We need to balance our time indoors and our use of technology with being in nature, in the sun and walking barefoot / grounding to discharge (where do you feel most at peace, in front of the computer or walking in a forest at sundown?).
Much more in the full document, which can be found in the description of the video on my channel.
1. Health Effects of 5G
The health effects of 5G have not been studied enough. Actually, they have barely been studied at all and the studies that have been done are far from reassuring. No large-scale studies have taken place before the rollout of the technology. This in itself, is of course completely outrageous. At the very least, it violates basic human rights against mass population experimentation.
www.blumenthal.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/at-senate-commerce-hearing-blumenthal-raises-concerns-on-5g-wireless-technologys-potential-health-risks
Review some of the studies that has been done on milli-meter waves (the coming frequencies that will be used for 5G) - These preliminary studies show clear adverse health effects:
“Preliminary observations showed that MMW increase skin temperature, alter gene expression, promote cellular proliferation and synthesis of proteins linked with oxidative stress, inflammatory and metabolic processes, could generate ocular damages, affect neuro-muscular dynamics.”
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29402696/
2. Studies on different wireless technologies
2G, 3G, Wi-fi and the radiation from current cell towers etc. have been studied to different extents (see point 3 below) with very mixed results. There is currently no clear scientific consensus as claimed by certain regulatory bodies. As with scientific research on other environmental pollutants, EMF research is complex and contains inconsistencies; some studies show very significant negative effects while others are showing no effects, depending on what kind effects were being studied.
4G on the other hand hasn’t been studied very much at all (!) and with 5G “we are flying blind”.
Excerpt from Scientific American, “we have no reason to believe 5G is safe”:
“Since 5G is a new technology, there is no research on health effects, so we are “flying blind” to quote a U.S. senator. However, we have considerable evidence about the harmful effects of 2G and 3G. Little is known of the effects of exposure to 4G, a 10-year-old technology, because governments have been remiss in funding this research.”
blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/
3. Thermal Effects vs Non-Thermal Effects - Studies on EMF-effects on humans, insects, plants and larger animals
The claim that there are only thermal effects from non-ionizing radiation is simply put, not true at all.
Despite what some say, there are in fact at least a couple of thousands peer-reviewed studies from credible sources showing significant negative biological effects of non-ionizing RF-radiation.
On this website you can find a very good summary of much of the research that has been done, I highly recommend checking it out:
ehtrust.org/science/research-on-wireless-health-effects/
ehtrust.org/scientific-research-on-5g-and-health/
One of the best papers written arguing against 5G, by ORSAA - Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association (ORSAA):
ORSAA submission to ICNIRP - “Inquiry into 5G mobile telephony”
www.orsaa.org/uploads/6/7/7/9/67791943/orsaa_submission_to_5g_inquiry_oct__2019_final_v2.pdf
ORSAA database with more than 3000 studies:
n431.fmphost.com/fmi/webd#Research_Review_V4
Link to more than 500 peer-reviewed studies showing harmful health effects and biological effects:
drive.google.com/file/d/19CbWmdGTnnW1iZ9pxlxq1ssAdYl3Eur3/view
An evaluation of 2266 studies from one of the world’s oldest and most well-known general science journals showed that 68,2% of the studies demonstrated significant biological or health effects:
“A recent evaluation of 2266 studies (including in-vitro and in-vivo studies in human, animal, and plant experimental systems and population studies) found that most studies (n=1546, 68·2%) have demonstrated significant biological or health effects associated with exposure to anthropogenic electromagnetic fields."
www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3/fulltext
Appeal to stop 5G on earth and in space, with links to a couple of thousands of studies on health effects and effects on insects, plants and animals:
www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal#fn10b
New Hampshire Report (Nov. 1 2020) - Documents Scientific Evidence That Questions the Safety of 5G
“President of the Senate Donna Soucy summarizing its findings that safety assurances for 5G have “come into question because of the thousands of peer-reviewed studies documenting deleterious health effects associated with cellphone radiation exposure.”
“The report referred to the FCC as a “captured agency with undue industry influence,” citing the Harvard Press Book “Captured Agency: How the Federal Communications Commission is Dominated by the Industries it Presumably Regulates,” which compares the wireless industry to the tobacco industry.”
“The FCC and FDA did not respond to the Commission’s request for testimony, and the FDA did not fully answer the Commission’s questions. The National Cancer Institute response to the Commission was that NCI does not make safety recommendations or issue guidelines and is not aware of any federal agency mandated to ensure wireless signals are safe for trees, plants, insects or birds. The New Hampshire 5G Report contains an extensive list of research studies, medical organizations and scientists in support of calling for a halt to 5G. “
www.gencourt.state.nh.us/statstudcomm/committees/1474/reports/5G%20final%20report.pdf
Dr. Martin Pall’s (Professor of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences - Washington State University) - Compelling Evidence for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them
www.radiationresearch.org/research/dr-martin-palls-latest-compilation-of-emf-medical-research-literature/
Prof. Martin Pall - Cellular Effects of Wi-fi and 5G (feb. 2019)
ua-cam.com/video/bsaB7ewFsN0/v-deo.html&feature=emb_title
Dr. Devra Davis - 5G, Wireless Radiation and Health: A Scientific and Policy Update (feb. 2020)
ua-cam.com/video/-AeSoC6la9c/v-deo.html
Continuation of the document:
4. The current safety standards
The current safety standards are based on industry modelling involving the head of a 100KG US Male (that is representative of 3% of the population only) who uses the phone for only 6 minutes.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.4218/etrij.2018-0231
Meet the dummy:
www.wearenotsam.com/
5. The two biggest studies to date show clear negative effects
Two of the biggest studies to date show clear evidence of harmful effects from EMFs, but for some reason (…) the FDA downplayed the results using arguments that don’t hold up to scientific scrutiny. Mainstream media reported only one side of the story and didn’t publish the thorough reply from the scientists.
www.niehs.nih.gov/news/newsroom/releases/2018/november1/index.cfm
ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/topics/cellphones/index.html
Here is a link to all arguments against the study thoroughly answered:
ehtrust.org/science/myth-vs-fact-national-toxicology-program-cell-phone-cancer-study/
“The US NTP results combined now with the Ramazzini study, reinforce human studies from our team and others providing clear evidence that RF radiation causes acoustic neuromaa (vestibular schwannoma) and gliomas, and should be classified carcinogenic to humans.”
Article about the NTP-study:
www.jrseco.com/can-cell-phone-radiation-cause-cancer-yes-says-ntp-rat-study/
“I would argue that the NTP warning was the most important RF-health development not only of 2018, but of the decade and most likely of the new millennium. Yet the expert panel chose to ignore it.”
“There is a discussion of the NTP findings in last year’s Swedish (ICNIOR) update. But that was based on an earlier NTP draft where the staff had opted for a weaker designation, “some evidence” of cancer. Later, after an in-depth public peer review, the NTP strengthened the conclusion to “clear evidence” of cancer.
That was the headline news of 2018. “Clear evidence” was a game changer; leaving it out of the annual update is a sure sign of bias. The NTP conclusion was now qualitatively different from the earlier draft -it could well have been the title of the panel’s 2018 update. But van Rongen, Röösli and the others ignored it.”
microwavenews.com/news-center/time-clean-house
6. Appeal from EMF-scientists
More than 250 EMF-scientists have signed an appeal and sent it to the UN calling for, among other things, a revision of the current international guidelines regarding EMFs.
“The International EMF Scientist Appeal serves as a credible and influential voice from EMF (electromagnetic field) scientists who are urgently calling upon the United Nations and its sub-organizations, the WHO and UNEP, and all U.N. Member States, for greater health protection on EMF exposure.”
www.emfscientist.org/
“The scientists who signed this appeal arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of nonionizing radiation. They have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals.”
blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/
7. Potential conflicts of interest and other major issues within the agencies that set the standards
The scientists within the organizations that inform the current standards, argue that they are enough and say that there is no reason to believe 5G causes any harm (without pointing to any studies to back it up) are in comparison very few.
What is called “global consensus” is in fact only “ICNIRP-consensus”.
“ICNIRP is a German-registered association which, soon after its inception in 1992, became the actual standard-setter of radiation limits. Most European governments - and WHO, the World Health Organization - refer to ICNIRP’s guidelines in their national radiation exposure limits.”
There are some very significant issues within these organizations:
- The members of these organizations are a very close-knit group as can be seen here:
www.kumu.io/Investigate-Europe/the-scientists-and-the-organisations#conflict-of-interest
- There is no representation of any scientists that raise concerns about EMFs
- All of them are appointed internally
“ICNIRP is not open to any professional interested. Members of its scientific committee are appointed. None who claims there is sufficient scientific material to lower safety standards are represented.”
- There seems to be a conflict of interest among some of its members:
98-page report from two members of the European Parliament, Klaus Buchner and Michèle Rivasi:
“The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: Conflicts of interest ,corporate capture and the push for 5G”
klaus-buchner.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ICNIRP-report-FINAL-19-JUNE-2020.pdf
“This report deals with an issue of which the importance cannot be overrated: the possible health effects of
Radiofrequency Radiation (RfR) or electro magnetic fields (EMF); It deals more specifically with how the scientific debate has been hijacked by corporate interests from the Telecom industry.”
Dariusz Leszczynski, PHD, DSC writes:
“In my two blog posts, ‘ICNIRP did it again…’ and ‘Mike Repacholi responds to ICNIRP did it again…’, I presented several reasons why the current modus operandi of ICNIRP is prone to provide unreliable and skewed evaluation of the scientific evidence on EMF and health. I was strongly opposed by Mike Repacholi, Chairman Emeritus of the ICNIRP, scientist who is responsible for the “birth” of this organization.
In my opinion the major problems of ICNIRP are:
- it is a “private club” where members elect new members without need to justify selection
- lack of accountability before anyone
- lack of transparency of their activities
- complete lack of supervision of its activities
- skewed science evaluation because of the close similarity of the opinions of all members of the Main Commission and all of the other scientists selected as advisors to the Main Commission.”
betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2016/04/08/is-icnirp-reliable-enough-to-dictate-meaning-of-science-to-the-governmental-risk-regulators/
Recent article by Darius Leszczynski, from September 2020:
betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2020/09/08/leszczynski-there-is-something-utterly-wrong-with-the-icnirp-membership/
The organization that the US FCC base their recommendations on:
“The IEEE-ICES is a slam-dunk case for the conflict-of-interest.”
“The safety limits developed by IEEE-ICES are designed by engineers working for the wireless telecommunications industry. Voting in this group on proposed safety limits is just a sham because telecom engineers vote on proposal prepared by the same telecom engineers. The telecom engineers always have the majority within IEEE-ICES. So, how trustworthy are these safety limits?
In summary, IEEE-ICES safety guidelines are prepared by industry engineers and approved by industry engineers who later implement them in their own industries as reliable and solely science-based and industry-independent safety guidelines.”
betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2020/04/08/pall-firstenberg-and-the-silent-enablers-are-responsible-for-the-current-5g-storm/
More resources about how industry funding influence research on RF-radiation and concerns about ICNIRP, FCC and the FDA:
“Scientific analyses show industry funding can and does influence research on radiofrequency radiation. Please take the time to review these studies and to review the documentation provided by experts. This webpage has published citations on the influence of industry and vested interests.”:
ehtrust.org/science/research-industry-influence-emfs/
“Some researchers have tried to study how conclusions on EMF radiation and health correspond with source of funding. In at least three such exercises by different people, in 2006, 2007 and 2017, the pattern was the same: The likelihood that industry-funded studies would find cause for concern, was dramatically smaller than in studies that were not industry-funded.”
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1797826/
www.seattlemag.com/article/uw-scientist-henry-lai-makes-waves-cell-phone-industry
www.orsaa.org/latest-news/is-icnirp-a-closed-club
”Doubt is our product since it is the best means of competing with the “body of fact” that exists in the minds of the general public. It is also the means of establishing a controversy.” Tobacco executive (22) in Doubt is Our Product by David Michaels”
mdsafetech.org/problems/industry-influence-in-science/
I suggest that you read some of what’s been referenced above and decide for yourself if the whole world should trust these people blindly without question and base their decisions about such an important issue based solely on their recommendations.
Remaining topics in the full doc:
8. Oxidative stress
9. Effects of milli-meter waves and other types of EMFs on the environment, ecosystems and animals
10. Our sweat ducts and eyes act as antennas for 5G-radiation
11. Brillouin precursor phenomena
12. The role of polarization in the biological activity of EMFs
13. Brain cancer
14. Effects on the cell’s mitochondria
15. Artificial Intelligence, IOT, social crediting system etc.
16. Security and Privacy issues with 5G and IOT
17. Legal Actions
Wow, I didn't know all this about how data was transmitted over the various cell phone technologies. Thanks for sharing, keep up the great work!
Dr Jack Kruse M.D. is a Neurosurgeon and Quantum Biologist.
This mini lecture will help you understand the electrical properties of your eyes and brain.
ua-cam.com/video/d7qjh4BIGbc/v-deo.html
@@charlessears6597 said: "Dr Jack Kruse M.D. is a Neurosurgeon and Quantum Biologist.
"
Already I smell BULLSHIT. "Dr." Jack Kruse may have been a neurosurgeon at one time, but after a fairly shallow dive on Google, all I can find are sites where he's promoting himself, *AND* a myriad of health products he sells. I guess as "CEO" of "Optimized Life, a health and wellness company", that's his job. It's kind of pathetic that a "CEO" has to resort to Patrion as a way to make money. One would think that such an "expert" would have NO problem earning a decent living, *especially* with such notable achievements as "biohacking water" and encouraging people to eat "an electron dense diet" becasue "we're DESIGNED for it". Yes, he ACTUALLY said that.
jackkruse.com/emf-4-why-might-you-need-carbs-for-performance/
There TONS more coverage of his quackery here:
carbsanity.blogspot.com/search/label/Jack%20Kruse%20Quackery
But the pseudoscientific BULLSHIT doesn't stop there!
"Our body works apparently on electricity and frequencies of light!"
yourfunctionalmedicine.com/jack-kruse-how-electrons-impact-our-lives-produce-magnetic-fields-and-fry-our-laptops/
There was the HILARIOUS account of Dr. Quack getting kicked off a cruise ship for TERRORISM when some enemy he's made on Twitter misattributed a quote to him.
nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2012/05/09/us-surgeon-booted-off-of-cruise-ship-accused-of-sending-terrorist-tweet/
Apparently he's pissed a LOT of people off being an asshole on some football forum under an assumed name. Of course he did NOTHING to cover his tracks, and the forum members doxxed him.
Here's a pretty good blog dedicated to exposing his (and other FRAUDS) antics: paleodrama.tumblr.com/post/29711905873/so-were-you-behind-shitkrusesays-on-twitter-and
It's not a surprise his name is being bandied about here. He's joined in the the 5G quackery by claiming that "TECHNOLOGY USE CAUSES HYPOXIA IN HUMANS". Of course where else does such "genius" publish such an important revelation? On Linked in of course!
www.linkedin.com/pulse/technology-use-causes-hypoxia-humans-jack-kruse?articleId=6639914368702177280
Now about this claim that he's a "Quantum Biologist", it's BULLSHIT too. As a discipline, it's VERY new, and it doesn't involve ANY of the things that Dr. Quack claims it does. Plus there's literally NO institution in the US that has a degree program confirming such a title. How new is it? Well, if you Google "Quantum biology" (quotes included), you don't even get 20,000 hits. Worse yet, the top hits are all sketchy anonymous Wordpress blogs. Literally EVERY other hit on the front page is equally as sketchy.
All you've PROVEN is that suckers like you are born every minute.
The amount of people trying prove that 5g is bad and the amount of ways they prove their conspiracies is mind boggling
yeah its not that bad 5G it only killed 5 kids and a teacher in a school in the usa brain cancer so they took the tower down so maybe its not that bad 26.000 scientists tried to stop it but thats not alot is it really. they used to use 5G on the ira and the women at greenham commen new clear bomb protesters
@@andrewharrop535is
Source?
@@iden63 just wait bro hes thinking of a draft
@@andrewharrop535is Source?
@@andrewharrop535is lmfao
never underestimate the bitrate of a truck full of hard drives.
@@tomasbeblar5639 hahahaha
sounds like AWS snowmobile
the sneakernet is still a thing
and what's the story about how at some point it was faster to tie a flashdisk to a carrier pigeon than it was to upload and transfer a large file over the interwebs?
My issue with 5G is the beamforming.
That gives the operators 24/7 tracking on your location with GPS accuracy or better.
This is a massive privacy issue. And it's not conspiracy theory.
I bet thats one of the reasons they want them
Yes, I agree. I wouldn't trust the government any government as far as I can throw them.
@@vloh3097 Watch the video
That's not how location systems work. If you don't believe me turn your WiFi and data off and you can still have your location
@@adam6543 Beamforming is how radar systems works. That and some latency measurement will give phone operators your location.
i love how the military has a eye icon
And there are eyes on our money, too! OMG, the money is spying on us!!!! This is just the government taking control over our minds!!!! Can't even trust dollar bills anymore!!! /s
Stonks
Just a disclaimer not related to the video's content:
10:52 animation may cause epileptic seizures, be aware.
Please put a warning, Real Engineering
Yes, let's move this comment up
We gotta move this up
@rrobertt13 Yeah because warning for epileptic seizures is "everything under the sun". No wait that's quite literally the most common and most important warning forms of video media provide.
I have been working on the wireless telecommunications field for 5 years and on my engineering degree for 3, and not once has any of the frequencies I've used caused me any damage (using 700MHz, 2.4GHz, 5GHz, 11GHz, 24 GHz, and early 60GHz). I can't believe people just blindly say something is bad without research and propper knowledge.
Thank you for creating this!
@@iflax7460 Even if it were true that RF from using a mobile phone handset MIGHT - like many environmental substances, food, plastics and so on - cause cancer, how does that mean that 5G is anything to do with Covid/Corona infection? And, when the WHO published that 'possible' opinion in 2011, there WAS no 5G. And what further evidence of 'possible carcinogenicity' of RF has emerged in the NINE YEARS since the WHO claim? NONE!.Your argument proves NOTHING!!!
People fear what they do not understand, and 5G looks different to them. Nonetheless, it still hard to believe that in the age of internet people would go and burn towers.
Because people are not educated properly, or outright stupid/ignorant. That's why nuclear power is such a taboo too. Most people are intimidated by stuff they don't understand, some of us are facinated by it.
Costea Adrian have a nice day cherrypicking science and news
@Costea Adrian Yet somehow light isn't harmful?
I love it when people who know fuck all about electromagnetic radiation freak out about 5G
All the while their phones use 4G LTE
I love it more when they try to convince me that 5g causes covid19 and the vaccine has nano particles that will interact with the 5g to control the mind .
I'm not even joking .
@@maclester5531 would be sick if that was true. My favorite is the microchip one. Like, these people think that modders wouldn't try to change that so they can get an LSD high?