Nitro200 V Tornado280 Climb Test

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20

  • @unclebuck8558
    @unclebuck8558 Рік тому

    My Tornado 280 arrived this week, first flight yesterday
    Very very happy

  • @thomasnappo6309
    @thomasnappo6309 2 роки тому

    Your very fortunate to be close to a dealer..support..parts..warranty...ld love one honestly...but there's no dealers close to me..

  • @davidis7
    @davidis7 Рік тому

    Great video

  • @hardtop123
    @hardtop123 2 роки тому

    i just love watching your always informative video clips mate.....and always done the fan man way......would for you to do a run up here to rocky/yeppoon and do a few tandems...scenery up here is wonderful.......stay safe mate

    • @FanmanAustralia
      @FanmanAustralia  2 роки тому +1

      Hello mate. Thanks kindly . Would love to for sure. Message me and we can arrange something this coming few months

    • @hardtop123
      @hardtop123 2 роки тому

      @@FanmanAustralia ahh copy that rodger wilco

  • @Cassam268
    @Cassam268 2 роки тому

    Hey Brett, Another great video. I haven’t worked it out yet, but the Nitro for the same pitched prop was producing 300 rpm more than the Tornado, yet climbed at a reduced rate. By rights it should be producing more thrust but there is more obviously going on, I just haven’t worked out what yet. 🤔

    • @FanmanAustralia
      @FanmanAustralia  2 роки тому +1

      G’day Tony. So mate the problem with doing these types of tests is minimising the variables. It’s not easy. In this test there were a couple things I didn’t mention to camera.
      Re tuning : both engines are running fine but some fine tuning of the needles would certainly provide some increase in RPM on both. I like to have a little room built in so I’m happy if they are slightly off max RPM as long as they aren’t labouring. I don’t feel they are/were.
      The Tornado was running the XC head which does reduce the max RPM somewhat whilst giving an improvement in fuel efficiency ( manufacturer claim ) With the standard head it sits at about 7400-7500. So I guess the Tornado wasn’t at 100% but that’s what these test are about mate, out in the wild in the real world testing thrust/climb under flying load.

    • @xaviert6804
      @xaviert6804 2 роки тому

      I think nitro and tornado use different pitch props. that's why less climb

    • @CaptainMedoc
      @CaptainMedoc Рік тому +1

      I think the reduction ratio between the engine and the prop might not be the same on both motors ..?

  • @joshperryppg
    @joshperryppg 2 роки тому +1

    Just going to mention that I love my Nitro 200.

    • @FanmanAustralia
      @FanmanAustralia  2 роки тому

      Good on you Josh. Yes I also am I fan I have had mine for a long time now and whilst there has been a few hiccups along the way it’s been a overall good experience also having a good dealer definitely has helped me but once you have flown a light weight paramotor it’s impossible to go back to anything with more weight

  • @michelbach6654
    @michelbach6654 2 роки тому

    Excellent video ! Thanks.
    And what about fuel efficiency differences between these two engines ?

    • @FanmanAustralia
      @FanmanAustralia  2 роки тому

      Hello Michel. yes I should do a video comparing the two for sure . at the moment the nitro burns anywhere from four to four and a half and the tornado is about four and three quarter to five and a quarter but I should do a proper test

  • @patrickmckowen2999
    @patrickmckowen2999 10 місяців тому

    👍

  • @thomasnappo6309
    @thomasnappo6309 2 роки тому

    To bad there known for alot of problems....customer service poor reputation..parts take months to get...l live in Canada lmagine the whole summer waiting for parts..

    • @FanmanAustralia
      @FanmanAustralia  2 роки тому +1

      Unfortunately that’s what has started to hurt the brand I agree