Chase Zero Reaches Range and Speed Milestones
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 вер 2024
- Emirates Team New Zealand have been continuing the successful commissioning and testing of their hydrogen powered foiling chase boat ‘Chase Zero’ on Auckland’s Hauraki Gulf since its launch just five weeks ago.
#ProjectSpeed
SUBSCRIBE to the official ETNZ channel: / emiratesteamnz
Like ETNZ On Facebook: EmiratesTeamNZ
Follow ETNZ On Twitter: EmiratesTeamNZ
Follow ETNZ On Instagram: emiratesteamnz
Stay up to date with the ETNZ newsletter: emirates-team-...
We will never achieve anything if we always say there is already something better. Kudos to the team for exploring this technology.
this technology is nothing new
@@zachmoyer1849 that is true, it is not. But it's the first time I heard off a hydrogen motor in a hydrofoil hull being used
@@zachmoyer1849 why is it always a measuring contest on ' oh it's old news this technology has been around for ages, do keep up'
By definition this is new - "already existing but seen, experienced, or acquired recently or now for the first time." Taken from Oxford Dictionary
It is new
@@TheFreshSpam because they keep touting this as a new groundbreaking tech that is the answer to a green future but they have no way of making cheap hydrogen that doesn't involve fossil fuels. so if it is new to somebody I would like them to understand that this is just a marketing stunt of the oil industry to capture continued government funding of their operations under the guise of clean energy. it may have some uses in large ships but for the average persons daily life it makes no sense.
This tech has been around for decades, but government allowed big oil to suppress the technology.
greetings from Indonesia, the Aru Islands, Maluku province on the Indonesian border with Australia
I could never understand why they continued to chase the foil race yachts with outdated chased boats loaded with 4 huge fuel-hungry outboards, instead of using a chase boat on foils hydrogen or not. good to see they've finally seen the light.
The Insetta 35IFC has a range of 1000Nm at 45kts with a pair of 300HP outboards getting OVER 2MPG at cruising speed. Probably a similar carbon footprint unless they're using one of the brand new methods to extract the hydrogen.
But the main purpose of a chase boat is better fulfilled by a conventional hull’s ability for approach and rescue. For camera work the foils are def the way to go.
@@blacksquirrel4008 The Insetta 35IFC tags both of those boxes. The only drawback is, it uses those "evil" gasoline powered outboards.
@@michiganengineer8621 p
What about making it full electric with a self energitic circle system that will allow the boat to inlimited range of sailling in the ocean
Good flat water test, I saw one wake crossed where it made a bit of a dive. I will be watching for real world testing.
Keen eye there ! Had me wondering about the foil control...
Very cool. I gotta say the whine of the electric motor can never replace the harmonics of a couple combustion engines vibrating under your feet.
Unless you've ridden in a crew boat to an offshore platform
He was talking into camera while running at 30knts I would not miss the noise of combustion
From someone that used to regularly travel over 150 km's a day in a boat I couldn't care less if I didn't have to hear that loud annoying drone for hours on end, I used to get a sore throat trying to communicate {yell} with my crew mates....
@@douglasashby4349 Sure, but from the video it doesnt seem less noisy than a ICE boat?
Awesome! Great job ETNZ! Keep up the good work and Auld Mug stays where it belongs to time indefinite, hopefuly...
There are a LOT of Americans commenting here....one can tell by all the negativity about something that is actually pretty cool.
-Veteran '66-68 (And embarrassed about the actions of my country since, well, pretty much when I learned how to read.)
Same here. Fuckers always sling shit but as soon as you ask them what accomplishments they have done it is always something like "I wiped my own ass today."
know nothing about boats, is the idea of foils to bring the hull out of the water in order to be more efficient by not having to push the hull through the resistance of water?
Yes
ARC One
LOA: 24ft (7.3m)
Motor: 350kW
Battery: 200 kWh
Top speed: 35 knots
Range: 160nm at 35 knots
Starting price: $300,000 / £226,000
hero
Terrible top speed for that power and size of boat, I wonder what it weighs?
That's a wicked water weapon
I don't understand a thing but boy! This is awesome!
Nice calm seas for testing, I wonder how it performs in rough seas, or submerged object strikes ?? Either way hydrogen is the fuel of the future, but I fear the fuel companies will monopolise production .
Not many boats perform great after hitting a solid submerged object. It would also be impossible to test with the different conditions such as what the object is, size, weight, even water type.
I agree . We live by water access only , take the kids to school, work ..by a 5.5m barge . We quite often run “ over” things . Oyster sticks, bags, logs, and as long as it’s not a direct strike on the outboard, there isn’t even a bump or any thing felt, objects get pushed under on a high speed barge. Haven’t gone to foils because of this, kids wouldn’t be smiling with a 30 kn whipeout,trip ,on a log,…
@@benrobertson7855 Not to mention absolutely disastrous possibly deadly. 😉
That craft would explode if it ran aground at that high a speed and very high CG . The craft would flip over, nose first.
Not well I doubt lol
Very nice, even if it uses more energy to be generated we are also advancing in clean nuclear power plants, it can be refueled very quick, it have 0 emission, you don´t have to add 600kg -1Ton of battery to have some range, you don´t have to harvest and dispose heavy metals from/in environment.
platinum ? hydrogen is farrrr from green
That is a good range, need to take it out in rough weather now and see what happens, how big were the hydrogen tanks.
Very impressive
About time they got a minimal wake chase boat.
How much did the hydrogen cost? Asking for a friend. Was it made using natural gas by any chance?
Where do they get the hydrogen?
The vast majority of the world hydrogen is produced from fossil fuels.
Impressive stuff.
Hydrogen is great in blimps too.
ระยะห่างของปีกซ้ายขวา 1 เมตร
ช่องว่างนี้จะเป็น 2 แทงค์แนวตั้ง
เพื่อกดให้เรือจม ห้องโดยสารจะ
เล็กกว่าของเครื่องบินเล็กน้อย
ใต้เบาะนั่งเป็นถังออกซิเจน 8 ถัง
น่าจะดำได้ ซัก 10 ชั่วโมงครับ
Excellent step forward in using hydrogen with batteries.
Really? You think those two together cost zero carbon to make, maintain and charge?
From all I've read, it takes more fossil fuel to power an electric than the actual fuel needed for an IC vehicle.
@@jackflash6377
"From all I've read" you didn't read enough
@@jackflash6377 You probably got your "facts" from outlets sponsored by the fossil fuel industry!
what do you mean with batteries?
@@jackflash6377 thats not true if you look at just burning fossil fuels in a powerplant compared to burning it in a ice engine. if we electrified our industry with centralized powerplants and just used batteries for short distance rural commuter travel it would all make sense
Can this thing move through waves? Can one use it to cross the ocean?
Pray that doesnt catch fire because thats gonna be one hell of a boom
Why are we still not seeing these boats in barcelona
Captain Safety says, *"Wheres your floaty vests?"* **stern look with smile**
It was power by Toyota hydrogen fuel cells system.
i am very curious what kind of range this would be on land.. probably a lot more since there is less friction
I think much less because it has no wheels
Probably would just sit there. Though a Nissan Leaf achieves 1 mi/250wh if that’s what you mean.
The foils don't work very well on land - they tend to plough the tarmac or grass surface and break bits off the foils.
Energy consumption is very high at high speed on water. Foiling is much better than planing, but a road vehicle of the same size would go much further on the same amount of hydrogen. A Toyota fuel cell car carries only 15% of the amount of hydrogen carried by this boat, and will go much further at higher speed.
This is so cool.
Interesting video. If the music were not so loud I might even know what was being said.
I really hope you can buy one of these soon.
How much does Hydrogen cost to manufacture compared to diesel and what is the total energy required to make the hydrogen, again compared to diesel.
depends how you make it but it isnt economical no matter how you spin it
Give hydrogen the same infrastructure as Diesel and I can bet you alot it will end up cheaper
@@TheFreshSpam Likely not, producing/storing/transporting cryogenic liquids is very, very expensive. Even something like nitrogen, which you can just fill up a specialized tanker with and let it bleed off to maintain safe pressures, it's way, way more expensive than Diesel, and that's an established industry.
Hydrogen is always going to be a pipe dream, and we should be putting our efforts into fusing it into helium to produce heat/steam/electricity, and getting graphine batteries off the ground. Those are the logical next steps and we're going into them half hearted.
@@zachmoyer1849 From my understanding, it takes 6 times the energy to produce Hydrogen than the hydrogen contains. Another green fraud.
@@TheFreshSpam Not in energy consumption in it's manufacture.
Hydrogen is largely greenwashing by oil companies. Most commercially available hydrogen is made from Methane (natural gas), a fossil fuel mostly produced and controlled by oil companies.
Burning the natural gas in an internal combustion engine is simpler and more efficient.
And when Hydrogen is made from electrolysis of water, the same input energy will drive an electric vehicle 3x to 4x as far as a Hydrogen vehicle.
@@schrodingersmechanic7622 while what your saying is absolutely true, my argument would be to focus on infrastructure rather than battery tech improvements; for example hot swap centers etc.
@@schrodingersmechanic7622 Most passenger cars are driven 40 miles/60 km per day or less. That can easily be recharged at work, home or shops a couple times a week.
Most private vehicles are parked 23 hours a day. Any of that time can be used to charge if any location they're parked at has electricity. Charging speed in practical terms is a non-issue for most driving.
For long distance road trips, existing fast chargers networks in EU and U.S. (especially Tesla's) can recharge enough range during a bathroom or food break to go the next 200 miles/300 km. That drive takes at least 3 hours in most places. (Not everyone has an Autobahn.)
EVs are already highly practical both for local driving, and with a good fast charger network, cross continent drives also. Many people are already easily doing this today.
@@oskarskates Tesla built a battery swap station and found almost no one needed to use it since their fast charger network is so fast and extensive.
Lots of people are already doing long road trips, like thousands of kilometers, in EVs.
@@schrodingersmechanic7622 Eventually apartments will have charging too. People who don't have charging at home charge at work, shopping, etc. Some cities even have street parking with charging. All that's really needed is an electric outlet.
Inaccurate. Of course burning gas is simpler. Warming our hands over a cave fire is simpler too, but we don’t do that much any more do we? Most of current H2 is not green, but that is changing.
Regarding the batteries ...they would be too heavy for the required range. Perhaps you are using a passenger vehicle as a reference. Yes in that application batteries are much better. But it is very different from the needs of comparatively large marine vessel. In this case H2 fuel cells are a very good option. And the difference in efficiency is more like 2x not 3 or 4 as you state. Reference Real Engineering's video The Truth About Hydrogen @10:57 .
Green H2 (electrolysis from clean energy) is a very viable alternative for large, near constant load applications like marine.
What is it like over choppy waters and swell? Say, a 1.5 m swell.
What makes it so loud?
Ever try putting out a battery 🔥
Shipping liquid Hyrogen is estimated to be 5x the cost of transporting LPG per Kj stored.
While hydrogen is an abundant elementr it does not exist in nature in a usable form, unlike LPG.
Production of Hyrogen gas requires high input of electricity as does the process to pressurise it to a transportable/usable liquid state. Currently the most efficient production model cinverts LPG to Hydrogen gas but with a significant CO2 footprint.
Neither liquid nor gas hydrogen are safe to transport by pipeline necessitating transport in extreme pressure containers. An expensive process that can not be scaled.
Currently LHG costs $12 per Kg to the consumer, compared to $3 per Kg for LPG and less than $2 per Kg for gasoline. The higher LHG cost is unlikely to change significantly due to cost of transporting it.
Before exploring fanciful uses of Hydrogen we need to explore how can we produce it economically.
Didn't the hydros hit anything floating just beneath force of the water?
Incredible craft !
Would this be benefited by an air propeller. Like airboats. ?
Air propellers are really noisy... enormously so. They would have to wear hearing protection at all times. Secondly, its too slow to benefit, I saw an old testing graph, and the air screw wasnt more efficient until 100mph or more. I would say its even more today, when comparing with surface drives and stuff like that.
No. A propeller is more efficient and effective in the water.
What's the awful Noise? Gearbox?
that is cool but its says nothing on how big the tank is, how big the motor is, or how much the boat weighs. so their numbers mean nothing. anything can go that distance given a big enough tank of fuel.
How much fuel was Used per Knot?
Fuel capacity is 33.2 kg of hydrogen, so the test used 90% of that. Divide by the number of nautical miles covered...
Sorry couldn't hear you over the sound of the motor mate 😂
In addition to range and speed, it appears to be chasing a milestone for deafening levels of noise.
So what did it get for a fuel mileage?
At the end they concluded that it would travel 165 nautical miles (300 km) on a full fuel load, which is 33.2 kg of hydrogen (four tanks with 8.4 kg each). So, that's 9.2 km/kg or 11 kg/100 km (the energy equivalent of 48 L of gasoline per 100 km). Is that good? No, compared to a car or truck, but probably good compared to other boats at 28 knots.
thats much better than a battery set up. Hydrogen is the way to go, not battery.
They went 150 nm but they didn't say how much hydrogen they started off with.
The boat's capacity is 33.2 kg (four tanks at 8.4 kg each). They started with full tanks.
@@brianb-p6586 thank you!
How is it propelled?
The hydrogen feeds fuel cells which produce electricity. The propellers are driven by electric motors. Batteries store energy so that it can use more power than the fuel cells can provide, for a while.
freaking awesome
No-no-no, it's rather nice.
English please.
Hydrogen to electric or HICE?
fuel cells (so, hydrogen to electric)
What's a tank of Hydrogen cost ??
At the current retail price in the USA (USD$16/kg), the 33.2 kg of fuel in this boat would cost USD$531.
Here take my money now
That's impressive 👍🏾
Nice but, why complicate the engineering by adding the complexity of hydrogen when you already have an electric motor, battery pack etc, just have faster charging and a larger battery pack. Maybe 10 years ago this would have been a practical solution but with better capacity battery cells and faster charging it just seems an odd choice. A petrol range extender generator would be a better option.
@Grim FPV yes but hydrogen also takes a large amount of energy to produce, with that energy you could put it directly into the battery pack cutting out the extra engineering and parts required. I’ve converted my sail boat to electric drive and have a small petrol generator as a redundancy (can run the motor directly or charge the battery pack) and so far haven’t needed to use it. A hydrogen powered vehicle is a battery electric vehicle with a hydrogen generator system added.
A lot of green electricity is what NZ has so conversion to hydrogen makes sense. Batteries are just not energy dense enough
@@douglasashby4349 this is an awesome build for sure and better yes using green energy to produce hydrogen, still better to put that green electric straight into a battery pack though. May as well use petrol in a petrol generator which takes less energy to refine at around 6kwh per gallon. It just seems a bit of an expensive and unnecessary extra as a hydrogen powered vehicle has a battery electric drive train, and the space taken up could house more battery capacity and faster charging. Boats at the moment are lagging behind but it’s getting better here in the UK.
this boat is designed to be fast and have a long range. The amount of weight required to go a certain distance with batteries is much higher than the weight of hydrogen fuel cells. A boat just like this but with batteries would be much, much heavier, thus it would be harder to lift out of the water, thus it would use more power, thus the batteries would have to be bigger, on and on until the boat is one big battery. This boat is for chasing race boats, so there will always be downtime like overnight to fill the hydrogen tanks. They did not design the boat around fast fillups because it was not necessary. This boat is designed for a purpose, and it needs to be lightweight.
you're thinking in practical terms, for everyday vehicles. Batteries are perfect for normal cars and boats. This is not a normal boat, it is built for a purpose. THAT is why you complicate the engineering, because its necessary for the specific goal you have in mind.
you're thinking about how to efficiently go around UK canals/toodle around. You're right, you don't need or want hydrogen, it is indeed way overkill when you can just get a bigger battery for your sailboat. But think about what is different between your use case and these guys.
@@Naturalchorus well said. Agree fully
I like this boat, it could replace Jenny. Can it pull a shrimp net?😀
awesome
Very flat water. Easy test. Try crossing a good size wake.
Theres the Future of Boat Travel right there!
Real Shit !
I need one
Nice.
The noise is a huge problem so........
Why not just a flat ski along the bottom of each hulls keel, foils break and must be pushed through the thick water fluid.
Aero engineers note that the pressure on the bottom of the foil causes the lift and so going through a medium like air the air over the top must be guided, but a ski top side is in an extremely low density medium and it has minor effect compared to the denser water it is sliding on.
Just trying to be helpful.
Have a look at the SeaSki boat.
Immersed wings can have higher efficiency and control. Fluid dynamics and wave mechanics.
@@miloblue2052 did you look at the youtube SeaSki?
It will make you think.
It looks like a catamaran
It appears to be robust and no flight controls like altitude
A SeaSki with a foil !
Perhaps ?
As I said have you seen the video?
@@stephenbrickwood1602 I looked at 3 SeaSki videos, and detect no breakthrough. While it might have a niche in moderately low draft and low waves, you can see how it rides at the surface with stiff side-catching fins, little suspension give, and like any planing hull, expends significant energy into displacing the surface of the water. That's why I don't expect to see it displace other versatile practical low or high speed craft. Do you expect to see it in the Americas cup? I do think it is potentially little more crashworthy, and nicer to sea life than current racing sailboats.
@@miloblue2052 good observations. 👍
My thought on both technology is that to lift the boats weight up is because the foils or ski deflect the same mass down.
Same energy.
The deep cat hulls and foils lift up the same distance above the water surface.
The impact on the cat hulls includes a cushion of air.
The skis would be more robust.
A 'fly off' between identical sized boats would be interesting 🤔.
Skin friction on both maybe different, a hydro step up across the ski maybe interesting.
I do like both boats.
@@stephenbrickwood1602 I like your idea of a boat fly-off. If i find the time to go further, I'll msg you.
Why did I click on this? I guess I needed to know?🏆🔥😂. Thanks YT
I understand you are sponsored by Toyota but (green) hydrogen is at best horribly inefficient taking around 3x as much electricity per mile.
The worst part is there is a push for blue hydrogen which is Steam reformation of natural gas using CCS to capture the co2 that is released on the process. The problem is that it's using fossil fuel still and CCS doesn't work.
Do you need 150Nm of range on a chase boat? Batteries are cleaner and more efficient and can be charged directly from solar/wind.
Or, in a properly designed system for a one-off boat like a Cup Chase Boat, have a hatch where the batteries can be quickly hoisted out at dockside and replaced with fully charged ones. The issue with using wind/solar to do the recharge "on the run" is you'll never be able to keep up with the current drawn by the engines and "house loads", not even in something as big (and relatively slow) as a Silent 60.
@@michiganengineer8621 the sail GP boats do battery swapping. There's a container with solar on the roof they just swap in charged batteries that run the electrical systems that do the foil and wing controls other than the main sheet.
Considering your average house is only a few hundred watts base load these days with efficiency of modern equipment a sailing boat with solar and regen can easily keep up with that. And motoring if you keep your speed sensible isnt that much of a draw.
@@DorsetSaferRoads A good sailing cat in the 45'+ range likely could I will agree. Unless you had to motor exclusively. A chase boat, expected to do 25kts plus for an extended period of time, not sure at all about that! I didn't know that about the Sail GP boats, thanks for that information!
@@michiganengineer8621 that's why they have got for a foiling chase boat.
The candella foiling boat uses the same power at 4 knots off the foils as it does at 25knots foiling.
My boat can hit 42 knots but I hardly drive so fast. I always drive at 22-28 knots for fuel economy traveling
Thanks for sharing. We were all wondering about your boat's performance.
More importantly, how fast can you go in rough water and not spill your beer all over you when you try to drink it...
Motor awfully loud , or is that the hydrofoil Drives ?
Very little of the noise would be from the fuel cells; that's likely almost all motor and gearing noise.
This puts the Hydro in hyrdofoil...
I'll see myself out.
FLAT sea…😎 🌊 🤪
Heavy weather.......?
Guess not.
Hydrogen has 100 times more energy density than current lithium ion battery technology. You can add more batteries to the boat but you will pay the price in added weight. With the extra weight this boat probably wouldn't stay on plane with any useful range.
it also has to be in a cryogenic liquid state for this to be true which takes even more energy and cant be kept in an idle state as the hydrogen will slowly bleed off.
looks dangerous
How come Emirates is sponsoring a New Zealand sailing team and not Air New Zealand? Seems like a conflict of interests. Fly better for whom?
Emirates has the budget for it AirNZ doesn't?
If that’s the case then it should be called Team UAE sponsored by Emirates. What a nefarious set up.
Today whatever the attempt, everything done is suffering from a lack of altitude.
Green or blue hydrogen?
Yes!
careful guys, the "experts" have all of a sudden decided that hydrogen is also a greenhouse gas...
WTG team
🔥🔥🔥🌟🔥🔥🔥
แต่ของผมดำน้ำได้ด้วยครับ
แถมหายตัวแบบปลาหมึก
What happens if you hit a log?
you get two logs of smaller sizes.
What happens if you hit a log with a regular boat?
@@huntspoint3442I'll take my chances on the regular boat thanks
Perhaps it's best simply not to hit logs.
It’s a valid question. This is why multiple attempts to establish a foil ferry between Victoria and Seattle failed.
I wouldn't like to be anything swimming just below the surface when a 30Knt knife blade comes at me.. how can they avoid Dolphin or whales etc!!
They DON'T
They can avoid them by looking. I hit a whale with a 50' Pacifica and it left a huge mark on the whale and the boat.
Even making forward looking sonar, compulsory on foiling vessels wouldn't be good enough with the current quality and performance of such tech.
@@toptastic66 Especially since most, if not all, of the CIVILIAN forward looking sonar systems I've seen pretty much stop working once you top 8 - 10kts through the water. Now if you could get military grade equipment that would be different, but still short of the speed that foil is shooting for.
I can understand wanting to jump on the "Green" bandwagon. But you're re-inventing the wheel when there is an existing boat that has a 1000NM range at 45kts with a pair of 300HP Mercury outboards.
Us Kiwi’s are a wee bit anal lefties.
We ain’t too political but we try our best to do a little bit for our planet.
Yes but at what cost. If you keep comparing this to combustion engine craft you don't see the point. Nz has very expensive gas or petrol at nearly $10 per gallon
@@douglasashby4349 So to fill the tanks of an Insetta 35 (490 gal) would cost about $4,900.00 Yes it's expensive, so is everything about owning a boat. How much would it cost to go a 1,000 miles at 45 mph in that hydrogen fueled boat? That _IS_ the point to the typical boater. Plus, petrol or diesel is available at almost every marina, can you say the same for hydrogen fueling?
@@michiganengineer8621 Well, we should stop developing then. Let's go back to steam power, or maybe even human power.
Just in case you didn't learn this in engineering Skool, The Mercury guru didn't just wave his wand and "POOF" there is a pair of 300hp engines and a big ass ol' fuel tank. They have been working on engines for quite a while now.
@@andrewc0128 Oh I agree, improvements are ALWAYS available (we aren't anywhere near the level of the Valeronian's yet. Sorry, a Sci-Fi reference). But as of right now, H2 doesn't have the energy density of the same volume of gasoline (or petrol, depending on where you are) when you go from energy needed to produce to energy recovered BY use. It's getting there I agree! But until the energy (and storage) needs are closer to parity, the "old fashioned" IC engines will still rule the game I'm afraid.
Manatee and shark chopomatic. These would not work in Florida
Right Baldylocks where can I bloody buy one!! 😂😂
Astonishing how noisy this thing is. How comes?
Cool looking boat, but I couldn't imagine it doing well in rough waters.
Batteries would have been so much better but understand you are pushed into hydrogen due to Toyota, hopefully they will drop out as sponsor soon and you'll be able to align with an EV company 🤷♂️
That hydrogen at these concentrations is highly explosive means the tanks to hold them must be VERY strong,
and that means they must be very HEAVY, compared to liquid fuels. A green alternative is liquid fuels can be made from solar energy.
No one cares especially Putin... we have perfectly good combustion engines and climate change is nazi hogwash.
Oil is organic and green.
High pressure carbon fiber tanks are actually lighter than their alloy counterparts.
@@thomaskonig57 And air is lighter than water...is about as relevant. CF liquid tanks are lighter than CF pressure tanks.
Fantastic absolutely the way to go, way better to go hydrogen with only water coming from exhaust than batterie's that only last for ten years then they go in the super toxic waste bin that is going to be the next environmental problem how to dispose of all the dead lithium.
And what?
So what happens when you hit a whale or floating log in the water?
Has this thing been test crashed?
Should have a UA-cam video for it and it's safety features.
Looks expensive.
What new technology was cheap when it was invented? If they hit something the foils break off and they have two hulls to float on, did you miss that?
@@teeanahera8949 GOT EM
So desperate to just make a negative statement that you did so without thinking things through and ended up sounding stupid. This will continue as long as you continue the same practice, hope you learned something here boss...
It's a prototype vehicle.
Valid
ahahah youre sitting in a sea of infinite hydrogen
Siapa kau? Balak?
I like seeing the tech and alternative fuels. Horrible sound.
the sound doesn't sound comfortable even for humans hehe
Is this thing just a video platform? Not much room. Easier ways of going 30kts. But its all about looking cool and billionaires saving the planet while racing about on their carbon fibre foils. 🤣🤣🤣
assalamu'alaikum ada tim majelis disini? Nonton?
Mohon perhatikan klip ini.
Ada info yg mengatakan bahwa. N tim Emirates, baca ya,
Info ini bagus sekali bagiku.
Info ini buruk sekali bagi tim iblis.
Anda perhatikan bahasa kodenya ya, sy capture
but the issue with creating hydrogen burns more fossil fuel then it saves... Toyota has been investing huge into it an they cant figure cells out or refueling world wide without using more fossil fuel creating hydrogen uses fossil fuel you are replacing a problem with 2 problems
@Damon It depends how you do it.... you can burn zero fossil fuel if you do it by electrolysis!
after the money Toyota has thrown at this tech i don't think its that simple lol
@@Damon-fj8jl Why not ? Some people are already doing it!
@@Panoramix0874 Not on an industrial scale, YET. There ARE a few new methods for generating hydrogen that look promising, but even the electrolysis (except in a few cases) is powered by either some form of fossil fuel or nuclear to provide the electricity.
@@Panoramix0874 because its worst then fossil fuel the very thing its trying to replace lol from start to finish fossil fuel is better.
Ridiculously outdated already. I have a hydrofoil that utilizes a Mr. Fusion.