True, they have tenders which bring supplies and weapons, oilers which provide aviation fuel, aircraft that bring the mail, and a 13+ yr nuclear fuel life.
Luckily the 5 eyes nations (UK, US, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia) are all best of friends and probably the strongest multinational alliance in the world
I'd suspend Canada while Trudeau remains in power. A G20 country with the 27th ranked military. No intention of meeting 2% spending. Left out of AUKUS subs. It's at the back of the line for F-35s due to decision making delay.
@WorldWarRepoter BRICS is a joke for military might. Brazil is a poor nation with little to no combat experience Russia is corrupt it can’t even win a war with a much smaller nation that’s next door India and China have disputed borders with militaries that still have to rely on wage tactics and are both paper tigers. South Africa is self explanatory XD
Northern Ireland would be a First-Fast objective. Once taken the US can deploy shorter ranged assets, C-130, F-15/16/35, drones and set up a radar picket. Then it would be a matter of when the US wanted to strike. Also, The Navel repair schedule is only in peace time. In a war footing, repair schedules are stretched out over a longer period, and only when necessary. Once Northern Ireland is secured it would then be used as a staging and recovery location.
Lets just put it this way, no other country wants to find out why the U.S. doesnt have universal healthcare 😂. Our military and technology,and sheer quantity of it all is truly terrifying. I always say,if I've gotta be somewhere in a time of war,its going to be USA. Our country might seem divided at times,but nothing would cause unison more than the idea of someone invading our homes. We might have a joke of a president, but hes not the only one that can initiate war 😊. Love to the rest of the world 🎉
"If we wanted to" our UK, Aussie NZ, and Canadian brothers and sisters in arms are 1000% priority protect in an emergency, because they'd do the same for us.
All the toys we have are great to be sure. However what in my opinion is more important is the amount of training that we take part in even when things are quiet we keep training on one level or another. I did my part for the 6 yrs I served. But I'm truly glad that we are all good friends.
Also in case of war, a huge number of Americans who haven't served are very familiar with firearms. Imagine drafting a million Ukrainians vs a million Americans - which group will have more men who own and shoot modern AR-style rifles?
We 'mericans are damn powerful. Hope we don't do somethin' stupid. Yep. 🇬🇧♥️🇬🇧♥️🇳🇿 Love is all you need. The Beatles said that to the world more than 50 years ago. I think people should listen to that.
Also consider the industrial capacity of the US to produce new/more vehicles, munitions & weapons which is staggering. Music suggestion: The Sound of Silence by Disturbed.
United Kingdom asked the United States, to be a protectorate country of Australia, New Zealand, Tasmania. And placed Canada missile protection US notifited England that they have always been under our protection
Just isn't economically or morally viable for the US to attack and invade the UK. But it would be very possible if America wanted it bad enough, though. And then what would America do with the royal family? If they were driven out of the UK, would they all go to Canada?
According to the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Defense was distributed a total budget of 1.8 trillion dollars for fiscal year 2023. More than 4.9 billion dollars a day. The entire yearly defense budget of the UK would last the DoD about 11 days. It's a truly astonishing ammount of money that gets consumed.
Binkov gives the Brit’s far too much credit, 6 months to own the sky? And sea…nah it would be weeks at most, and that’s best case for the Brit’s. I’m not doubting they’d fight like hell, it doesn’t matter if you fight hard these days, not in the open, against the weapons we have. Well. Doesn’t matter best as much, as they don’t kiss, unless a failure in equipment, or gross user failure. They simply don’t have the numbers, with pretty equal tech and training in most cases, some of each better on each side, their navy Woukd last days at most, as wanna know how’d we open up? Mass B-2 raid, and other stealth aircraft we have, to take out as many ships and runways/planes, sub/bases as we could. Knocking out most in the initial strike, with conventional bombers and aircraft not long behind. Air Force times with Navy birds and cruise missiles, plenty of jamming. And decoys. And all of the tomahawks known to man, to precede the fixed wing, conventional birds, to take out any remains runways/aircraft on the ground radar, communication hubs, infrastructure and govt buildings, barracks, motor pools, etc. we would severely damage their military in the opening salvo. While gutting their government and infrastructure in the first hours of combat, including police and fire stations. Power plants, bridges. Rail yards, ports. Any major distribution center related to the government major broadcast centers of any kind. Cells and and any server farms/major satellites. All that would fall to a massed initial strike, and any aircraft that survived and scrambled, would be shot down, no matter how good the plane or pilot is, they don’t have the numbers to stand up to that, each plane in the air could and would meet up to dozens missiles over the first and last mission. Let alone try to hit our ships? Good luck, they would be able to damage some, maybe sink a couple. But only at the cost of all attacking aircraft lost, at that ratio they’d run out of aircraft and munitions before we ran out of sustainable, deployed ships. At that point we’d go ham with even more cruise missiles and constant bombing…eliminating anything that uniformed and cohesive, aka military and government. Their subways? Knocked out with bunker busters, to prevent fast. Mad movement of men and material. It’d be ugly and we’d likely take pretty high losses in the non stealth aircraft, but we’d wind the air and sea battle, effectively in the opening day. At least at strategic level. It’d take a number of weeks, at most to finish off all air and naval power while still striking at government and infrastructure targets, fully crippling them and blinding them. Then we could do as we please more or less, we’d rock heavy. Every assault ship. Probably 8 carriers then. Most of our escorts, for fire support of landings….and a whole bunch of marines. Woth every AF jet we could get there, staggered in waves, of course probably ti match as best as we could the cycle time of carriers and their planes endurance. And all the sea lift ships in an armada. Timed with airborne right before, or even during/after the first landings, to maximize troops on the ground. And give them months of supplies at that point, especially considering losses. Doing that. We could have closer to 50k in the first day or two…with a small influx at a slow, low level for the next few weeks, then another surge. At least until we took an airport and repaired it, which we would, then the troop funnel would begin, and expand. And if we weren’t playing nice. Then be pacified and co-operate. Or die. It would take months to fully invade and pacify. But they’d be without a governs or formed. Uniformed military that whole time after a few days at the beginning.
It's an alright video but he made several mistakes.. US doesn't operate on air superiority. We operate on air supremacy which means we try to take out aircraft before the even leave the airbases like during desert storm
Only problem with this, it doesnt take into account how we wage war. First thing we would do, is send a few hundred Tomahawk missiles to every radar station, command center, etc before any conventional forces were even en route. Then we have the ability to send a division or two on a nonstop flight into the airspace to drop them wherever we wanted a foothold (not taking into account the tier one forces who would already be there). We would send F-117s from the US to Iraq and back on non stop in flight fueled trips during the 90s... Plus all of their estimates on "deployment" times arent accounting, again, for how we wage war. Then he showed that the C-130 (most) cant be refueled mis aid which is also false. We actually have C-130 tankers as well as the KC-10 🤣Thankfully the odds of any war between the US and UK is about as high of a chance of us going to war with Canada. Would take the world flipped on its head for that day to come.
Courtney I've seen a lot of your but they haven't seen you react to one that you might think is real funny sometime back you saw Abbott and Costello's who's on first you might like also Abbott and Costello's shooting dice this time Costello turns the tables on Abbott is extremely funny you might want to look it up it is called shooting dice
Can't ever see this happenning we love the Brits one of if not our best friend in the world. Of course it wasn't always like that but thats another story.
Even though the US has a lot of assets I would never underestimate the UK. They are very good at war with a lot of experience. They have very devious minds for it.
Well, for the UK to match the US defense budget they would need to spend roughly 1/4 of its gdp. Thats kinda a big ask to be ready incase your best friend decided to kick your teeth in lol
Interesting hypothetical but would never happen. Forgetting even the rest of the anglosphere being very close allies. The US and UK in particular are extremely close. So much so that they actually have the largest foreign investment into each other's countries than any other allied nations of the world. Canada is a brother (same with Australia and new Zealand) and the UK is our good ol pappy.
The quick answer is yes. Holding it after the invasion would be the problem. This has been our Achilles heel in our past imperial endeavors. Think Afghanistan, Iraq, and Somalia.
@@JoannDavi the two countries in your example was never a part of some imperial takeover. Afghanistan and Iraq could be argued as such. Germany and Japan were not occupied until after signing an unconditional surrender. While the US did defeat Japan without invasion, one could argue Germany was defeated by the USSR and the Western forces were there just to mop up. Think of the direction Germany was moving in the East when D-Day occurred. You'll find it was westward in retreat.
Good thing the Anglo-American Alliance stands strong lmao i really would dread the day when we invade our cousins under the crown's land it would feel like heresy if united states send the fleet to battle with our cousins of the past 😒😒😒even my catholics of Ireland 😭my familys ancestors have an unpayable debt to irish Catholics 😭 im all good for a good scrap with them but to raise a sword towards your ancestors and their lands is dispicable and very heretic.Gods save the Queen.
Good lawd Courtney!! Where have you been hiding your friends?? I watched every second of your reaction video feeling the same way you did describing the LARGE power of our fleet lmao 🤣 😅 hope you have a great day
This video is silly. The UK are our brothers and sisters and this scenario would never happen. This video suggests that we are aggressors by the way it was titled. "If we wanted to." We would never want to...
Keep dreaming buddy. If we wanted too your entire country would belong to us within a year. You know we have special forces too, right? And it was us who saved your ass twice in the 20th century or you would all be speaking German. Stay smoking that copium.
While the british special forces are the elite of there's still a finite number of those people And the radar command centers. Is The technology developed along with the US.
@@ArkOfTheShadowlook at how we wage war. Tomahawks would be airborne in the 75 - 150 count towards every radar station, command installation, and harbor and any other morale lowering Target before the any of our conventional equipment would be near. That is not accounting for us launching anywhere from 2-4 per target for redundancy.
The carrier maintenance times are peacetime estimates. During war, carriers will not have to spend anywhere near the same time in maintenance.
True, they have tenders which bring supplies and weapons, oilers which provide aviation fuel, aircraft that bring the mail, and a 13+ yr nuclear fuel life.
Luckily the 5 eyes nations (UK, US, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia) are all best of friends and probably the strongest multinational alliance in the world
I'd suspend Canada while Trudeau remains in power. A G20 country with the 27th ranked military. No intention of meeting 2% spending. Left out of AUKUS subs. It's at the back of the line for F-35s due to decision making delay.
@Serbia_Russia_Chinaincorrect but keep trying. China and Russia are trash and you know it lol
@Serbia_Russia_Chinabrics? Are u actually stupid? 😂😂
@WorldWarRepoter BRICS is a joke for military might.
Brazil is a poor nation with little to no combat experience
Russia is corrupt it can’t even win a war with a much smaller nation that’s next door
India and China have disputed borders with militaries that still have to rely on wage tactics and are both paper tigers.
South Africa is self explanatory XD
Simply not true
Northern Ireland would be a First-Fast objective. Once taken the US can deploy shorter ranged assets, C-130, F-15/16/35, drones and set up a radar picket. Then it would be a matter of when the US wanted to strike. Also, The Navel repair schedule is only in peace time. In a war footing, repair schedules are stretched out over a longer period, and only when necessary. Once Northern Ireland is secured it would then be used as a staging and recovery location.
America supports UK's every accomplishments, still very much respected as to how we began.
Not in Northern England
🇺🇲 We are buddies and some of my ancestors came from the UK. I'm glad we are close knit today. 🇦🇨
I am from Manchester in England..
Who gives a shit
You look wonderful, Courtney. I love your smile as you react in each video. "Fly the friendly skies!" personified.
Lets just put it this way, no other country wants to find out why the U.S. doesnt have universal healthcare 😂. Our military and technology,and sheer quantity of it all is truly terrifying. I always say,if I've gotta be somewhere in a time of war,its going to be USA. Our country might seem divided at times,but nothing would cause unison more than the idea of someone invading our homes. We might have a joke of a president, but hes not the only one that can initiate war 😊. Love to the rest of the world 🎉
I mean universal healthcare is still an option. The military budget is only a small sliver of the US GDP.
@@trevor3013I'd rather continue paying little to no income tax
America likes England, Australia, & New Zealand so you are ALL fine! Just know that if you "step out of line" you are TOAST! Hahaha....
So countries that are not in "line" with the US deserve to be militarily pulverized. And this brings you humor and joy?
"If we wanted to" our UK, Aussie NZ, and Canadian brothers and sisters in arms are 1000% priority protect in an emergency, because they'd do the same for us.
No they wouldn't, our fake allies have never helped us like how we've helped them.
All the toys we have are great to be sure. However what in my opinion is more important is the amount of training that we take part in even when things are quiet we keep training on one level or another. I did my part for the 6 yrs I served. But I'm truly glad that we are all good friends.
Also in case of war, a huge number of Americans who haven't served are very familiar with firearms. Imagine drafting a million Ukrainians vs a million Americans - which group will have more men who own and shoot modern AR-style rifles?
We 'mericans are damn powerful.
Hope we don't do somethin' stupid.
Yep.
🇬🇧♥️🇬🇧♥️🇳🇿
Love is all you need.
The Beatles said that to the world more than 50 years ago.
I think people should listen to that.
Don't be afraid Courtney,,,, we'll come and rescue you,we don't kill women and children
"The Royal Air Force has few planes than the US has on their carriers alone."
😅 Even as an American, these statistics are fascinating! And craaazy!
It would be game over for UK. But it would never happen. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇬🇧🇳🇿
glad your back
Also consider the industrial capacity of the US to produce new/more vehicles, munitions & weapons which is staggering.
Music suggestion: The Sound of Silence by Disturbed.
United Kingdom asked the United States, to be a protectorate country of Australia, New Zealand, Tasmania.
And placed Canada missile protection
US notifited England that they have always been under our protection
Just isn't economically or morally viable for the US to attack and invade the UK. But it would be very possible if America wanted it bad enough, though. And then what would America do with the royal family? If they were driven out of the UK, would they all go to Canada?
According to the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Defense was distributed a total budget of 1.8 trillion dollars for fiscal year 2023. More than 4.9 billion dollars a day. The entire yearly defense budget of the UK would last the DoD about 11 days. It's a truly astonishing ammount of money that gets consumed.
Binkov gives the Brit’s far too much credit, 6 months to own the sky? And sea…nah it would be weeks at most, and that’s best case for the Brit’s. I’m not doubting they’d fight like hell, it doesn’t matter if you fight hard these days, not in the open, against the weapons we have. Well. Doesn’t matter best as much, as they don’t kiss, unless a failure in equipment, or gross user failure. They simply don’t have the numbers, with pretty equal tech and training in most cases, some of each better on each side, their navy Woukd last days at most, as wanna know how’d we open up? Mass B-2 raid, and other stealth aircraft we have, to take out as many ships and runways/planes, sub/bases as we could. Knocking out most in the initial strike, with conventional bombers and aircraft not long behind. Air Force times with Navy birds and cruise missiles, plenty of jamming. And decoys. And all of the tomahawks known to man, to precede the fixed wing, conventional birds, to take out any remains runways/aircraft on the ground radar, communication hubs, infrastructure and govt buildings, barracks, motor pools, etc. we would severely damage their military in the opening salvo. While gutting their government and infrastructure in the first hours of combat, including police and fire stations. Power plants, bridges. Rail yards, ports. Any major distribution center related to the government major broadcast centers of any kind. Cells and and any server farms/major satellites. All that would fall to a massed initial strike, and any aircraft that survived and scrambled, would be shot down, no matter how good the plane or pilot is, they don’t have the numbers to stand up to that, each plane in the air could and would meet up to dozens missiles over the first and last mission. Let alone try to hit our ships? Good luck, they would be able to damage some, maybe sink a couple. But only at the cost of all attacking aircraft lost, at that ratio they’d run out of aircraft and munitions before we ran out of sustainable, deployed ships. At that point we’d go ham with even more cruise missiles and constant bombing…eliminating anything that uniformed and cohesive, aka military and government. Their subways? Knocked out with bunker busters, to prevent fast. Mad movement of men and material. It’d be ugly and we’d likely take pretty high losses in the non stealth aircraft, but we’d wind the air and sea battle, effectively in the opening day. At least at strategic level. It’d take a number of weeks, at most to finish off all air and naval power while still striking at government and infrastructure targets, fully crippling them and blinding them. Then we could do as we please more or less, we’d rock heavy. Every assault ship. Probably 8 carriers then. Most of our escorts, for fire support of landings….and a whole bunch of marines. Woth every AF jet we could get there, staggered in waves, of course probably ti match as best as we could the cycle time of carriers and their planes endurance. And all the sea lift ships in an armada. Timed with airborne right before, or even during/after the first landings, to maximize troops on the ground. And give them months of supplies at that point, especially considering losses. Doing that. We could have closer to 50k in the first day or two…with a small influx at a slow, low level for the next few weeks, then another surge. At least until we took an airport and repaired it, which we would, then the troop funnel would begin, and expand. And if we weren’t playing nice. Then be pacified and co-operate. Or die. It would take months to fully invade and pacify. But they’d be without a governs or formed. Uniformed military that whole time after a few days at the beginning.
I am American Indian, that would never happen. American Indian will stand with Europe
It's an alright video but he made several mistakes.. US doesn't operate on air superiority. We operate on air supremacy which means we try to take out aircraft before the even leave the airbases like during desert storm
*insert toph’s “I would destroy you!” From Korra
Is that a serious question the Navy can shut them off completely without even doing anyting
Now that you're a flight attendant, Have you thought any about getting your pilots license?
Britian couldn't beat us here in Revolutionary War or War of 1812 wheb they tried again so yeah now no chance they'd win if we invaded them
Noticed she sit further back from the camera 👀
We can conquer anyone. RAH. 😂😂
Only problem with this, it doesnt take into account how we wage war. First thing we would do, is send a few hundred Tomahawk missiles to every radar station, command center, etc before any conventional forces were even en route. Then we have the ability to send a division or two on a nonstop flight into the airspace to drop them wherever we wanted a foothold (not taking into account the tier one forces who would already be there). We would send F-117s from the US to Iraq and back on non stop in flight fueled trips during the 90s... Plus all of their estimates on "deployment" times arent accounting, again, for how we wage war. Then he showed that the C-130 (most) cant be refueled mis aid which is also false. We actually have C-130 tankers as well as the KC-10 🤣Thankfully the odds of any war between the US and UK is about as high of a chance of us going to war with Canada. Would take the world flipped on its head for that day to come.
Courtney I've seen a lot of your but they haven't seen you react to one that you might think is real funny sometime back you saw Abbott and Costello's who's on first you might like also Abbott and Costello's shooting dice this time Costello turns the tables on Abbott is extremely funny you might want to look it up it is called shooting dice
Can't ever see this happenning we love the Brits one of if not our best friend in the world. Of course it wasn't always like that but thats another story.
Even though the US has a lot of assets I would never underestimate the UK. They are very good at war with a lot of experience. They have very devious minds for it.
They would get smacked in a month
Well, for the UK to match the US defense budget they would need to spend roughly 1/4 of its gdp. Thats kinda a big ask to be ready incase your best friend decided to kick your teeth in lol
😅
you look stunning Courtney!
She's the most beautiful flight attendant with a UA-cam channel.
Interesting, I heard that to
Thank God we don't hold a grudge! Look at the video How the Star Spangeled Banner got its name.
Interesting hypothetical but would never happen. Forgetting even the rest of the anglosphere being very close allies. The US and UK in particular are extremely close. So much so that they actually have the largest foreign investment into each other's countries than any other allied nations of the world.
Canada is a brother (same with Australia and new Zealand) and the UK is our good ol pappy.
This video made me think of a big brother beating up his little brother. Not a nice thing.
All the more important that there is something dangerous enough to keep the U.S.A. government accountable. 2A all the way.
Great video happy weekend😊
Island nation peoples tend to fight more aggressively than their continental counterparts
Not true they just bury themselves in, and last far longer than expected... Let's see someone try to attack the US and see what happens.
Why would we want to?
We are allies and have no plans of attacking. Let your hearts be still. 😂
Got any oil?
Look up the US X-62 Vista.
From the North of England . We aren't on five eyes .
You are on your own
Our sons and daughters won't be raised
The quick answer is yes. Holding it after the invasion would be the problem. This has been our Achilles heel in our past imperial endeavors. Think Afghanistan, Iraq, and Somalia.
We do this better when rebuilding nations that had been real nations beforehand like Japan and Germany.
@@JoannDavi the two countries in your example was never a part of some imperial takeover. Afghanistan and Iraq could be argued as such. Germany and Japan were not occupied until after signing an unconditional surrender. While the US did defeat Japan without invasion, one could argue Germany was defeated by the USSR and the Western forces were there just to mop up. Think of the direction Germany was moving in the East when D-Day occurred. You'll find it was westward in retreat.
United Kingdom asked the United States to help protect Australian, New Zealand and Tasmania
United States told Great Britain that they will always be under US protection
Its Not eye opening, they couldn't do it, there fleets would get Nuked ..
Scotland, Wales, and ROI might act as US allies.
Yea crazyness
Everyone in this comment section is talking about the right things. E-Dubble is king.
No one knows nor cares who that is
@@kidfox3971huh. how strange. this is NOT the location where I posted that comment. strange indeed.
An Canada
The US would gain another state. It'd be the 12th largest state.
Linda brasil❤❤❤❤❤
don't be fooled by size......''the bigger they are the harder they fall
your so cute cc nice video!
Good thing the Anglo-American Alliance stands strong lmao i really would dread the day when we invade our cousins under the crown's land it would feel like heresy if united states send the fleet to battle with our cousins of the past 😒😒😒even my catholics of Ireland 😭my familys ancestors have an unpayable debt to irish Catholics 😭 im all good for a good scrap with them but to raise a sword towards your ancestors and their lands is dispicable and very heretic.Gods save the Queen.
Hi ❤
Good lawd Courtney!! Where have you been hiding your friends?? I watched every second of your reaction video feeling the same way you did describing the LARGE power of our fleet lmao 🤣 😅 hope you have a great day
What you didn't realize that the US would wipe their butts with you?
No need. GB runs the US since 1913 ;-)
UK is already invaded by African countries. UK army is a joke.😂😂😂
This video is silly. The UK are our brothers and sisters and this scenario would never happen. This video suggests that we are aggressors by the way it was titled. "If we wanted to." We would never want to...
Вот это сиски вау
Noice
Innit bruh!
Damn!!! Looking hot 😊
mmm cleavs
Your beautiful
No chance and I’m from the uk and the uk’s SAS teams would have the US right off 😂
Keep dreaming buddy. If we wanted too your entire country would belong to us within a year. You know we have special forces too, right? And it was us who saved your ass twice in the 20th century or you would all be speaking German.
Stay smoking that copium.
Plus all the skies are monitored by the Ministry of Defence at the command centers all round the UK
While the british special forces are the elite of there's still a finite number of those people And the radar command centers. Is The technology developed along with the US.
@@ArkOfTheShadowlook at how we wage war. Tomahawks would be airborne in the 75 - 150 count towards every radar station, command installation, and harbor and any other morale lowering Target before the any of our conventional equipment would be near. That is not accounting for us launching anywhere from 2-4 per target for redundancy.
A silly and irrelevant video. The UK is fully signed on to American Imperialism and has helped them commit unspeakable atrocities all over the world.
the usa and britain are friends and partners in security, why even pose this absurd question?
beautiful