it's simpler to load all structural Rebar shapes at once [just like plumbing fittings] you easily choose the bar shape to make use of as displayed on workspace [after clicking on 3 dots] ..... Thank you
Oh … how good … Nice Nice , some question then : 1. Could not we use only 4 profiles on the 2 half-circles to create the mass? (In stead of 3 on each half) Can’t we “reuse” the profiles at the end of arc for both sides? 2. You have mirrored the reference planes RP cause the array is not active in mass environment? But can we load the mass into project then array radial by angle all the RP then edit mass again? 3. Is it possible to create panels between the frames as a part of the adaptive family ? Like as if between the frames there are horizontal mullions ?
1. Yes, we can. However, we might not able to achieve the shape we expect. 2. Yes, I am pretty sure we can not use array in mass. Can you double check? I don't think conceptual mass works, model in place mass might work. I will not worry too much about this, because the mirror method is not too bad. It can be quite tricky to control the number and angles in the radial array. 3. Yes, just create spine through point between points 1 and 5, 2 and 6, 3 and 7, 4 and 8, place a point using draw on face, place a profile using draw on work plane, create form.
@@BINHE615 you are right …. Neither il conceptual mass nor in-place mass you can use array. In both environments it’s kept for repeater instead of array. Agree mirror is much much easier than array radial. Maybe you can show a supplement for this tutorial the bracings between the frames as a part of adaptive family. I can send you a little video to see the entire construction shape
Bin, the interesting thing is that the concept can be used in the construction of a mechanical part.
Good job!
Can you elaborate please?
it's simpler to load all structural Rebar shapes at once [just like plumbing fittings] you easily choose the bar shape to make use of as displayed on workspace [after clicking on 3 dots] ..... Thank you
I agree.
Thanks bin for sharing your skills❤️
Oh … how good … Nice Nice , some question then :
1. Could not we use only 4 profiles on the 2 half-circles to create the mass? (In stead of 3 on each half)
Can’t we “reuse” the profiles at the end of arc for both sides?
2. You have mirrored the reference planes RP cause the array is not active in mass environment? But can we load the mass into project then array radial by angle all the RP then edit mass again?
3. Is it possible to create panels between the frames as a part of the adaptive family ? Like as if between the frames there are horizontal mullions ?
1. Yes, we can. However, we might not able to achieve the shape we expect.
2. Yes, I am pretty sure we can not use array in mass. Can you double check? I don't think conceptual mass works, model in place mass might work. I will not worry too much about this, because the mirror method is not too bad. It can be quite tricky to control the number and angles in the radial array.
3. Yes, just create spine through point between points 1 and 5, 2 and 6, 3 and 7, 4 and 8, place a point using draw on face, place a profile using draw on work plane, create form.
@@BINHE615 you are right ….
Neither il conceptual mass nor in-place mass you can use array. In both environments it’s kept for repeater instead of array. Agree mirror is much much easier than array radial.
Maybe you can show a supplement for this tutorial the bracings between the frames as a part of adaptive family. I can send you a little video to see the entire construction shape
30:17 before creating form you zoom out not after, to show which form to create
Great, I will try next time, thanks very much.
Hi Ben, would you be interested in helping me with my project or may know anyone who can help me with it
You can always post your questions in the shared document.