I’ve watched a few of these videos now and the only thing that gets on my nerves is the pulse zooming thing. Gives me a headache! Please stop it. It’s unnecessary! Great story though.
What is that pulsing effect you've applied throughout this video? It's used as a transition but you've also applied it all over this pan and scan video.
A Gail Frame Many years ago some friends of mine , now dead, were at their favorite auction house in the historic section of Philadelphia. Due to inclement weather very few people showed up and now it was towards the end of the night, they were getting tired ; they had waited all evening to bid on a box full of random photographs that they liked as they were art collectors (and had millions of dollars worth of artwork on their walls.. they lived in the Society Hill section of Philadelphia and were socialites.) I can't remember if they said they paid as low as eight and a half dollars or as high as $17 for the Box of photos. Needless to say the photos were worth a fortune because they were by the controversial Robert Mapplethorpe. If you don't know who he is please look him up.. some of his artwork is shocking... that's all I can say. Moral of the story life just ain't Fair... or you could say best time to make a purchase at an auction house as during really bad weather when less people are likely to show up.
At 5:30 in... the photo on the right hand side looks really weird... what is up with that ? It almost looks like he had been seriously injured or shot in his face and we're seeing the aftermath... although something's not right.. or they had somehow tried to touch up the photo of this face to erase maybe very thick deep scars ? There's got to be a reason the photo looks like that and yet there's no explanation of it. Does anybody else notice this and think it's really strange ?
Exactly how did this "pay off" for the finder? He insured it for 5 million, big deal, it's actually worth $2, what he paid for it. The only way it could "pay off" is if someone actually paid him 5 million for it, which hasn't happened. And why would it change history" if it is genuine? It's a photo, nothing else, it definitely wouldn't change a thing.
I saw the special on TV about this. If I remember right, I believe the change in history pertains to who killed the kid. They were trying to prove this picture was taken after Billy's death.
So what history was changed? It's very obvious this picture is real, and the Kid. Always an "expert" though to try and deny anything they didn't discover themselves. I'd like to know how these "experts" got to be when there hasn't been any other pics of Billy anyway. And who really has proven the only other one is really him. Whoever they are, this is the same guy in both of them. This is really old news anyhow. The pic has already been verified and sold.
I've see this before. I believe it is BTK, especially with facial recognition software and two others in the photo who are striking matches for other regulators. I suspect those who are quick to dismiss the photo have motives for saying it's bogus.
I agree. Even if the current view point were shifted to the right, the large tree seems to be further beyond the house now than it seems to be in the old photo. However, I'd have to see it in person myself.
well, the building is different as well, or the entire roof was replaced with a different pitch. also look at the front of the building, see anything else that is different?
Reading the comments here.. Gosh there are some real jealous wankers! That really is a find of a lifetime!! Awesome that it never got burnt or accidently trashed. Found 140 years later!
These videos are too drawn out and much longer than necessary. That being said the content is pretty good once I've cleared time in my schedule to watch them.
no mention of the building behind them, no mention of the other two men in the photo if they were with the gang billy is with as proving who they were of the other folks in the picture they were proven a relation to any of the three?
For me, the narration is padded with too much insignificant information, something I've noticed in several of your videos. FYI, for that reason I hesitate clicking on them when I run across the.
Billy the kid should not be romanticized, but pitied for living an unhappy life which compelled him to act out. It was hard being billy the kid and unfortunately he projected his anger and shame onto others by committing crimes and murder.
you have to like armchair psychology - never have to meet or talk to a person to know what drove them to do things or if they were happy or not doing them .... just a thought.
Sorry, but is it impossible to edit the title of the video ? WTF does "May Actually Be Have The Power To Ch ge History" mean in English? And when you see the little squiggly red line under a word, do you think it's decorative? Try this...hover your cursor over the word and right click...I promise you, it will help!
'May' being the operative word...there is no irrefutable evidence that this is Billy the Kid. This is just trying to bolster a wafer-thin claim in order to make money!
I’ve watched a few of these videos now and the only thing that gets on my nerves is the pulse zooming thing. Gives me a headache! Please stop it. It’s unnecessary! Great story though.
Video title may actually be have the power to motivate kids to study harder in school.
that 1880 picture is better than cameras now a days
The pulsing of the photos gives one a headache. Rethink that special affect. It drives people away.
whats with the pulse zooming thing?!?? annoying AF!
HEY YOU KNOW WHAT WOULD BE GREAT? IF YOU COULD JUST DIM AND BLUR THE IMAGES OVER AND OVER WHILE I'M TRYING TO WATCH IT THAT WOULD BE SUPER.
You never can tell what you'll find in an old box.
What is that pulsing effect you've applied throughout this video? It's used as a transition but you've also applied it all over this pan and scan video.
RDJim it's to distract you so you don't realize it was STOLEN
All the pulsing of the video is really irritating and makes me feel queezy
Alex Gorakine ikr they’re assholes!
who ever made this title needs to go back to grammar school
frank forster, definitely it’s very embarrassing
EVERY DAMN VIDEO IS GRAMMATICALLY INCORRECTLY SPELLED I HATE IT
You too.
frank forster it was 1 mistake calm down
he did it on purpose, notice that it is spelled the same in the description? weird...
A Gail Frame
Many years ago some friends of mine , now dead, were at their favorite auction house in the historic section of Philadelphia.
Due to inclement weather very few people showed up and now it was towards the end of the night, they were getting tired ; they had waited all evening to bid on a box full of random photographs that they liked as they were art collectors (and had millions of dollars worth of artwork on their walls.. they lived in the Society Hill section of Philadelphia and were socialites.)
I can't remember if they said they paid as low as eight and a half dollars or as high as $17 for the Box of photos.
Needless to say the photos were worth a fortune because they were by the controversial Robert Mapplethorpe.
If you don't know who he is please look him up.. some of his artwork is shocking... that's all I can say.
Moral of the story life just ain't Fair... or you could say best time to make a purchase at an auction house as during really bad weather when less people are likely to show up.
That title is more fucked up than a soup sandwich.
3:30 - 1881, the year my grandfather was born..! And I knew him in his nineties. WOW..! history was like, yesterday.
When I clicked on the video I was expecting how it will change history.
When the music cuts out and you think something is wrong with your headphones
"Best Dollar Eighty I Ever Spent.. hahahaha"
At 5:30 in... the photo on the right hand side looks really weird... what is up with that ?
It almost looks like he had been seriously injured or shot in his face and we're seeing the aftermath... although something's not right.. or they had somehow tried to touch up the photo of this face to erase maybe very thick deep scars ?
There's got to be a reason the photo looks like that and yet there's no explanation of it.
Does anybody else notice this and think it's really strange ?
What interests me most is how the trees changed place over the time and also became shorter
Stop with the effects
The photo may have the power to change history, but it sure as hell doesn't have the power to spell.
Great story from old wild west history, congratulations on finding that one of a kind photograph..
Looks JUST like the famous confirmed photo of Billie. Identifying the others in the photo is the right move here
Best TITLE ever... It makes sense..... yeah...
So tired of this voice and dragging a 1 minute story into a 10 minute nap
every time I see that blue plane, I imagine a red triplane coming up fast and shooting it down
Nearly had a stroke reading the title
I hope Randy will finally pay me back the $20 bucks I lent him 5 years ago for a bottle of ripple....you got 5 mil.!
Shambles1980TRealOne so basically you're saying $20 million ain't worth a shit.
Felt like i was playing mario cart ... Kept getting the fucking mushroom .
While I was watching I realized I'd seen it on a history page, and it's a picture of an old outlaw
It makes you wonder who owned that storage container
Man, seriously, who in the hell wrote the title for this video?
so all those people and animal kept their pose so perfectly... astonishing... taking a picture back then was quite a time-consuming affair.
he kept having to restart the background soundtrack lol.
WOW!! HAVING FUN WITH HISTORY IS A GREAT WAY TO SAVE THE TRUTH OF WHAT HAPPENED YEARS AGO THAT SEEMS TO NOT INTEREST THIS GENERATION.
Finely, a photo of Billy printed correctly, he was right handed. Pix was always printed in reverse image
The way they did the pictures with them jumping gave me an instant migraine.
That Nat. Geo documentary was very interesting
How does this have the power to change history
That barn looked like the one on the picture
When you can't even keep a photo still, that is bad. Can't watch with all the shaking and zooming. Don't know what it's about.
Is the ghosting zoom effect really necessary?
Is that music from FarCry 2? Lmao.
Exactly how did this "pay off" for the finder? He insured it for 5 million, big deal, it's actually worth $2, what he paid for it. The only way it could "pay off" is if someone actually paid him 5 million for it, which hasn't happened. And why would it change history" if it is genuine? It's a photo, nothing else, it definitely wouldn't change a thing.
I saw the special on TV about this. If I remember right, I believe the change in history pertains to who killed the kid. They were trying to prove this picture was taken after Billy's death.
So what history was changed? It's very obvious this picture is real, and the Kid. Always an "expert" though to try and deny anything they didn't discover themselves. I'd like to know how these "experts" got to be when there hasn't been any other pics of Billy anyway.
And who really has proven the only other one is really him. Whoever they are, this is the same guy in both of them.
This is really old news anyhow. The pic has already been verified and sold.
The “special effects” spoil the story and make it difficult to watch.
I've see this before. I believe it is BTK, especially with facial recognition software and two others in the photo who are striking matches for other regulators.
I suspect those who are quick to dismiss the photo have motives for saying it's bogus.
I’m Billy the kid! I have scars to prove it.
No, I don’t!
The thumbnail pictures are different. Unless that tree has the ability to crawl.
Never use those VFX ever again.. it's terrible. They gave me a headache
well, either tne tree moved or the building moved....seems stupid to me
IT WAS A TRAILER HOUSE..
I agree. Even if the current view point were shifted to the right, the large tree seems to be further beyond the house now than it seems to be in the old photo. However, I'd have to see it in person myself.
Cat Fish not the same tree, the tree in the pic would be over 125ish years old so it would be far taller not shorter.
The tree in the original photo is long gone. Think of how old this photo is. Those are newer trees in the background.
well, the building is different as well, or the entire roof was replaced with a different pitch. also look at the front of the building, see anything else that is different?
Billy the Kid was his nickname. His real name is William the Child.
Why does the video explode every few seconds
Look at the ears. It is genuine.
Is that the same house in the background as is in the pic with Billy?
My last name is McCarty... I'm kinda creeped out
The house has 3 windows the picture only has 2
Okay, so let's assume the photo is authentic and that it actually is Billy the Kid in the picture. How does that change history?
hmmm watchjojo.. sounds *ODDLY* familiar
HMMMMMMMMM
the picture is mirrored back to front trees on the lift then on the right, make your mind up
Billy wouldn't have worn a dumb sweater like that. case closed
Thats not how it works. You can't change history.
Why would this change history? It doesn't even have the power to make a decent UA-cam video.
There's a typo in the title
the title was really hard for me to read
ch ge?
*WHAT*
Reading the comments here.. Gosh there are some real jealous wankers! That really is a find of a lifetime!! Awesome that it never got burnt or accidently trashed. Found 140 years later!
Yes, just saw this show they got 5 million for this picture nice for a $2.00 investment.
The pulse zooming OMG! Couldn't finish the video. =(
what made him think it's Billy The Kid? And if so....so what?
These videos are too drawn out and much longer than necessary. That being said the content is pretty good once I've cleared time in my schedule to watch them.
Cool pic, whether Billy or not. Doubt if it will "change history" though.
I watched a documentary on this and the steps he took it was Billy the Kid he was so excited when he discovered that in the documentary
I had a relative who helped him escape in new mexico (last name McCulloch)
Fix the audio. Can't hear it.
usacookie that's just you.
Why, in the name of all that is holy, do the still photos need to pulse?
Am I the only one who noticed the incorrect grammar in the title?
How does this change history?
First of all, "Old Photo Bought for $2 May Actually BE HAVE The Power To change History" , what's with the weird sentence forming.
no mention of the building behind them, no mention of the other two men in the photo if they were with the gang billy is with as proving who they were of the other folks in the picture they were proven a relation to any of the three?
OMG WHY THE PULSING OF THE IMAGE THROUGHOUT THE VID.
Maybe it's him, maybe it isn't, but either way it doesn't Actually Be Have The Power To change History.
I thought they where soviets at first
For me, the narration is padded with too much insignificant information, something I've noticed in several of your videos. FYI, for that reason I hesitate clicking on them when I run across the.
Be have?
your missing a "A" in your title
retraceyo face AN A, NOT A A.
*You’re missing an “E” in the word “your”. :)
retraceyo face and it’s AN NOT JUST A*
Shelby Seelbach AN AN NOT AN A*
i don't understand the title of this video
May actually be have
"May have the power to ch nge history" nice grammar title maker
REGULATORS!!! MOUNT UP!
Great video, but the photo effects need to go
You do not need the "be" in your title.
Billy the kid should not be romanticized, but pitied for living an unhappy life which compelled him to act out. It was hard being billy the kid and unfortunately he projected his anger and shame onto others by committing crimes and murder.
Joe A not true he was predominantly a cattle rustler
you have to like armchair psychology - never have to meet or talk to a person to know what drove them to do things or if they were happy or not doing them .... just a thought.
To ROTTK9 - It is not as complicated as you think, once you gain the knowledge and experience.
Joe A is it the amount of Crack you smoke, or just natural stupidity, that makes you say dumb shit.
Curtis C = Troll
Sorry, but is it impossible to edit the title of the video ? WTF does "May Actually Be Have The Power To Ch ge History" mean in English? And when you see the little squiggly red line under a word, do you think it's decorative? Try this...hover your cursor over the word and right click...I promise you, it will help!
5:34 SAME RIGHT EAR
IT WAS PAULY THE PUNK.
STOP PUMPING THE PICTURES!!! GOSH!!!
'May' being the operative word...there is no irrefutable evidence that this is Billy the Kid. This is just trying to bolster a wafer-thin claim in order to make money!
Interesting, I have never heard of this photo. Also, Billy the Kid looks like he has downs...
So did this $2 photo change history?
house don't even look like the one in photograph...
ilamik kimali should it? It was over 120 years ago dumbass
You kiss your mum with that mouth?, I simply had a an opinion...not worthy of such a response.