@@jukkahakkarainen1721 Yes,the Russians tried to enter the Finnish Forests in 1939 and you guys gave them Hell.If they try again there will be much more than 10 000 Swedes joining you🇫🇮🤝🇸🇪
1:46 Finland was indeed required to return territory to Soviet Union, but territory, which Soviet Union had first seized from Finland in 1940, and which Finland seized back in 1941-1944. This is an important detail.
Finland didn't surrender to the Soviet Union. Finland signed a peace treaty and gave 11% of it's territory to get out of the war, and kept it's independence.
Finland did make a deal with Soviet union and got rid of the Nazis in Finland because that was the first term for peace with the Soviets. Finland had the Lapland war against Germany and this was because Finland knew that they can't beat the soviets! There was 200000 German troops in Finland and after they got rid of them Finland had 12000 troops left. No equipment no nothing because those were Germany weapons! Finland had no air defense and it was impossible to transfer equipment because Germany destroyed all the bridges. The Moscow armistice went like this. The conditions for peace were similar to what had been agreed in the Moscow Peace Treaty of 1940: Finland was obliged to cede parts of Karelia and Salla, as well as certain islands in the Gulf of Finland. The new armistice also handed all of Petsamo to the Soviet Union, and Finland was further compelled to lease Porkkala to the Soviet Union for a period of fifty years (the area was returned to Finnish control in 1956).[1] Territories ceded to the Soviet Union constituted approximately 11.50% (44,106.23 km2) of Finland's territory (382,561.23 km2) prior to the Winter War and the Continuation War as dictated by the Treaty of Tartu. Other conditions included Finnish payment of nearly $300,000,000 ($5.2 billion in today's US dollars) in the form of various commodities over six years to the Soviet Union as war reparations.[3] Finland also agreed to legalise the Communist Party of Finland (after it had made some changes to the party rules) and ban parties that the Soviet Union considered fascist.[4] Further, the individuals that the Soviets considered responsible for the war had to be arrested and put on trial, the best-known case being that of Risto Ryti.[5] The armistice compelled Finland to drive German troops from its territory, leading to a military campaign in Lapland. heninen.net/sopimus/1944_e.htm there is a link. So we stabbed Germany in the back and turned against our biggest ally. Finland had 13 concentration camps in Karelia where we put all non Finnish women and children. We put Russians in those camps and they were all women and children. We wanted to populate Karelia with finns and make people talk Finnish and forbid speaking Russian! This is a crime and a shame to my country! We surrended to Soviets and we did everything they wanted and betrayed our ally! So don't come claiming here that we didn't surrender because we surrended and did everything Stalin wanted!
Historical correction. Finland never surrendered to the Soviet Union. The Soviet offensive against Finland during the summer of 1944 ended in Finnish defensive victories on the VKT-line and in U-position north of Ladoga. The last major battle before the armistice was the battle of Ilomantsi, which was the only place where the Soviets even reached the previous Moscow peace border on their fronts facing the Finnish forces and there they were defeated so badly that they had to retreat in dissarray leaving much of their equipment on the field. Finnish military was undefeated, up in arms and holding good defensive positions at the time the armistice came into force. The actual terms of the final peace treaty was written later in 1947 in Paris peace treaty.
@@BorderGuardJaegerFinlandia One of the objectives of the Soviet 1944 summer offensive had been the destruction of the Finnish army and a push long into the interior of Finland. Fortunately they failed in both and had to tone down their prerequisite conditions for armistice, which had before that included unconditional surrender. Needless to say that there would not have been a free Finland had they achieved their goals. Leonid Govorov, who was responsible of the Soviet offensive, summed it up himself noting that despite insufferably high casualties, no considerable success had been made.
@@BorderGuardJaegerFinlandia Soviet included Ukraine among others so what gives the new state of Russia to keep that landgrab as well Königsberg when Soviet Collapsed ?? when it belomgs to Finland by Culture
@@nenadmse Finlands independence did precede the existence of the USSR and has never in its history been any kind of Soviet republic. The communists and Soviet sympathizers lost the Finnish civil war, which broke out very soon after independence was declared.
Finland was never part of the Russian Empire, we were never of Russia, nor Russians. Finland was defacto briefly an autonomous Grand Duchy under Tzar of Russia. We had our own monetary system and currency, our own legislation and laws, our own borders, languages and culture. Our Senate run government was essentially a Republic in a time when average Russian peasants were still in a feodal landslavery. The Russian declaration of dominion read; "We Alexander The Third, by the Grace of God, Tzar over all of Russia, Monarch/Autocrat, Tzar of Poland, Grand Dutch of Finland, etc, etc...." The Tzar would appoint a Governor-General to oversee the Finnish Senate in his stea. The last of which we assassinated on the Senate's staircase.
Suomen puolustusvoimien pääasiallinen tarkoitus on olemassaolollaan ennaltaehkäistä hyökkäys etukäteen, mutta jos Suomeen kohdistuu suurhyökkäys, tarkoituksena on pystyä pysäyttämään se. Esimerkiksi Ukrainassa on vaikeuksia mm. ammuspulan vuoksi. Suomen puolustusvoimilla on riittävät ammusvarastot ja maasta löytyy myös valmistuskapasiteettia. Suomeen ei kannata hyökätä, koska täällä ei ole mitään voitettavaa. The main purpose of the Finnish Defense Forces' existence is to prevent an attack in advance, but if a major attack is aimed at Finland, the purpose is to be able to stop it. For example, there are difficulties in Ukraine, e.g. due to ammo shortage. The Finnish Defense Forces have sufficient ammunition stocks and the country also has manufacturing capacity. Finland should not be attacked because there is nothing to win here.
So meny mistakes on numbers. But there are mistakes in other facts too like: " No access to open water (=sea ?)". There is 1,250 km (=745 miles) of coastline to the Baltic Sea. 🧐
@@funkmachine9094 so meni misteiks on nambers. But theer ar misteiks in othe fäkts too laik: "No akses to open vater (=sii ?)". Theer is 1,250 km (=745 mails) of koustlain to te Baltik Sii. Now it's Finnish ASF.
The numbers are so incorrect... Where have you found those? The only relevant numbers are 280 000, the war time strength, and something less than 900 000, the reserve.
According to data by Comtrade, Finland's main export partners were Germany (11.5%), Sweden (10.7%), the U.S. (9.4%) and the Netherlands (7.1%); while the country’s imports came chiefly from Sweden (12.5%), Germany (12.3%), China (9.1%), Norway (6.9%), and Russia (6.6%). Of course, this data is publiced before the Russian attack in Ukraine. In 2024 Finland's trade with Russia is less than 1%.
In the picture Viborg is illustrated now in Russia 🇷🇺 landgrab grab by Soviet kept by Russia 🇷🇺 found by Sweden 🇸🇪 in the year 1295 - almost 500 years before St Petersburg
That naval ship was on the Neva river St. Pertersburg russia. And the ski patrol with ak's was somewhere from old eastblock too. Uniforms, helmets, guns, etc...
No. Vast majority of Finns escaped inside current borders and the current Karjala has been ravaged by russian policies. To bring them back to Finnish standards would be way too expensive. Why would we ever want to capture and rebuild area like that?
Can you guys stop with making threatening titles against Russia? I get that it's a easy way to get clicks, but i don't and i don't think anybody else here wants out defense forces to be associated with "NATO's new crazy frontlines against Russia" as if we are going to war. If something happens, yes, the finnish defense forces are ready to fight and defend our country. But just, please, this is the perfect video title to attract Russian propaganda bots.
Ruski terrorist kohta tulee aika kun palautamme Karjalan Suomineidon uumalle Valmistautukaa Ruski terroristi hakemaan Suomen passeja olette osa Suur-Suomea Ruski on ihmisjätettä terroristi valtio sota rikollinen turha huudella ydinaseista Ruski voi olla varma että kaikki NATON ydinaseet on suunnattu kohti venäjää siinä katoaa myös venäjä ja jos vanhat merkit ja videot Ukrainasta näyttävät että venäjällä asevoimat on Kaluston puolesta n1950 luvulta niin todennäkösesti Ruski Ydinkärjet räjähtää laukasu hetkellä siiloihin😂😂 meiltä voi aina vaatia mutta paha tulla ottamaan Ruski säälittävä valtio missä ei ole edes ihmioikeuksi mitään ei saa sanoa venäjällä valtio sulkee ja määrää kaikesta youtube sun muut on suht kiellettyjä kun isäaurinkoinen Hitler putina laatii lakejaan ja venäjän lampaat nöyrästi tottelee😂 Perkele sanon minä en ole tyhmempiä ihmisiä näyhyt kuin venäläiset aivopestyt jätteet
What are you saying? Are you saying that Finland dont have any firepower? They say "many country have an army, but Finland is an army having a country". Also have bombshelters and nuclear shelters to about every citizen. Of course country only 5.5 million can fo so much, but Finland is pushing way above it weight class. That finnish military power, you questioned, is builded in a method of "total defence", and pretty much means that any country who planning attack, can find costs overwhelming compared to benefits. So u have to do your homework before commenting. Also for show some respect is not a bad, unless youre a troll. Finland. Worlds happiest country for 7 years in a row.
We did not surrender to soviets. We'll never surrender to anyone. Never.
Nothing can beat Finland and Sweden when we stand together,Sisu Vikings🇫🇮🇸🇪
👋🤘
@@petejoki 🇫🇮✊🇸🇪
we have the land forces. you guys have tha navy and airforces
@@jukkahakkarainen1721 Yes,the Russians tried to enter the Finnish Forests in 1939 and you guys gave them Hell.If they try again there will be much more than 10 000 Swedes joining you🇫🇮🤝🇸🇪
@@jukkahakkarainen1721 Yes,they won't get through your Forests this time either🇫🇮🤝🇸🇪
1:46 Finland was indeed required to return territory to Soviet Union, but territory, which Soviet Union had first seized from Finland in 1940, and which Finland seized back in 1941-1944. This is an important detail.
Finland didn't surrender to the Soviet Union. Finland signed a peace treaty and gave 11% of it's territory to get out of the war, and kept it's independence.
We dont surrender never
Like french
So go pants
And Russians didnt even really do anything usefull with land they got😂
Finland did make a deal with Soviet union and got rid of the Nazis in Finland because that was the first term for peace with the Soviets. Finland had the Lapland war against Germany and this was because Finland knew that they can't beat the soviets! There was 200000 German troops in Finland and after they got rid of them Finland had 12000 troops left. No equipment no nothing because those were Germany weapons! Finland had no air defense and it was impossible to transfer equipment because Germany destroyed all the bridges.
The Moscow armistice went like this.
The conditions for peace were similar to what had been agreed in the Moscow Peace Treaty of 1940: Finland was obliged to cede parts of Karelia and Salla, as well as certain islands in the Gulf of Finland. The new armistice also handed all of Petsamo to the Soviet Union, and Finland was further compelled to lease Porkkala to the Soviet Union for a period of fifty years (the area was returned to Finnish control in 1956).[1] Territories ceded to the Soviet Union constituted approximately 11.50% (44,106.23 km2) of Finland's territory (382,561.23 km2) prior to the Winter War and the Continuation War as dictated by the Treaty of Tartu.
Other conditions included Finnish payment of nearly $300,000,000 ($5.2 billion in today's US dollars) in the form of various commodities over six years to the Soviet Union as war reparations.[3] Finland also agreed to legalise the Communist Party of Finland (after it had made some changes to the party rules) and ban parties that the Soviet Union considered fascist.[4] Further, the individuals that the Soviets considered responsible for the war had to be arrested and put on trial, the best-known case being that of Risto Ryti.[5] The armistice compelled Finland to drive German troops from its territory, leading to a military campaign in Lapland.
heninen.net/sopimus/1944_e.htm
there is a link.
So we stabbed Germany in the back and turned against our biggest ally.
Finland had 13 concentration camps in Karelia where we put all non Finnish women and children. We put Russians in those camps and they were all women and children. We wanted to populate Karelia with finns and make people talk Finnish and forbid speaking Russian! This is a crime and a shame to my country!
We surrended to Soviets and we did everything they wanted and betrayed our ally!
So don't come claiming here that we didn't surrender because we surrended and did everything Stalin wanted!
Historical correction. Finland never surrendered to the Soviet Union. The Soviet offensive against Finland during the summer of 1944 ended in Finnish defensive victories on the VKT-line and in U-position north of Ladoga. The last major battle before the armistice was the battle of Ilomantsi, which was the only place where the Soviets even reached the previous Moscow peace border on their fronts facing the Finnish forces and there they were defeated so badly that they had to retreat in dissarray leaving much of their equipment on the field.
Finnish military was undefeated, up in arms and holding good defensive positions at the time the armistice came into force. The actual terms of the final peace treaty was written later in 1947 in Paris peace treaty.
Exactly. Finlands military was still intact when the war ended.
They had stopped the Soviets bif/final summer offensive aswell ..
@@BorderGuardJaegerFinlandia One of the objectives of the Soviet 1944 summer offensive had been the destruction of the Finnish army and a push long into the interior of Finland. Fortunately they failed in both and had to tone down their prerequisite conditions for armistice, which had before that included unconditional surrender. Needless to say that there would not have been a free Finland had they achieved their goals.
Leonid Govorov, who was responsible of the Soviet offensive, summed it up himself noting that despite insufferably high casualties, no considerable success had been made.
@@BorderGuardJaegerFinlandia Soviet included Ukraine among others so what gives the new state of Russia to keep that landgrab as well Königsberg when Soviet Collapsed ?? when it belomgs to Finland by Culture
Finland newer exist as country before SSSR.
@@nenadmse Finlands independence did precede the existence of the USSR and has never in its history been any kind of Soviet republic. The communists and Soviet sympathizers lost the Finnish civil war, which broke out very soon after independence was declared.
Finland was never part of the Russian Empire, we were never of Russia, nor Russians.
Finland was defacto briefly an autonomous Grand Duchy under Tzar of Russia. We had our own monetary system and currency, our own legislation and laws, our own borders, languages and culture. Our Senate run government was essentially a Republic in a time when average Russian peasants were still in a feodal landslavery.
The Russian declaration of dominion read; "We Alexander The Third, by the Grace of God, Tzar over all of Russia, Monarch/Autocrat, Tzar of Poland, Grand Dutch of Finland, etc, etc...."
The Tzar would appoint a Governor-General to oversee the Finnish Senate in his stea. The last of which we assassinated on the Senate's staircase.
Correction: Russia is not the biggest trading partner for Finland. We do not even buy oil or gas from Putinland
Anymore...
Do not forget that we got 1 million ppls go to arms and they are highly trained. With modern arms.
We are not army... we are defense forces.
Suomen puolustusvoimien pääasiallinen tarkoitus on olemassaolollaan ennaltaehkäistä hyökkäys etukäteen, mutta jos Suomeen kohdistuu suurhyökkäys, tarkoituksena on pystyä pysäyttämään se.
Esimerkiksi Ukrainassa on vaikeuksia mm. ammuspulan vuoksi. Suomen puolustusvoimilla on riittävät ammusvarastot ja maasta löytyy myös valmistuskapasiteettia. Suomeen ei kannata hyökätä, koska täällä ei ole mitään voitettavaa.
The main purpose of the Finnish Defense Forces' existence is to prevent an attack in advance, but if a major attack is aimed at Finland, the purpose is to be able to stop it.
For example, there are difficulties in Ukraine, e.g. due to ammo shortage. The Finnish Defense Forces have sufficient ammunition stocks and the country also has manufacturing capacity. Finland should not be attacked because there is nothing to win here.
BEFORE Russia's Empire Finland was directly a part of Sweden.
Very correct
Soviet Union was part of Finland .. old good times😂
@@penttiperusinsinoori3037ha ha😅
So meny mistakes on numbers. But there are mistakes in other facts too like: " No access to open water (=sea ?)". There is 1,250 km (=745 miles) of coastline to the Baltic Sea. 🧐
many*
@@funkmachine9094 so meni misteiks on nambers. But theer ar misteiks in othe fäkts too laik: "No akses to open vater (=sii ?)". Theer is 1,250 km (=745 mails) of koustlain to te Baltik Sii.
Now it's Finnish ASF.
Before Russia's empire Finland was directly a part of Sweden.
The numbers are so incorrect... Where have you found those? The only relevant numbers are 280 000, the war time strength, and something less than 900 000, the reserve.
war time strenght 900 000 and reservist are 1800 000
@@spoonzor1 I have trustful sources you have non
@@Maysti87Where do you get 1.8 million soldiers when most of our country is elderly people and more and more migrants?
You forgot to mention NATO fifth article in addition. And JEF and USA agreements.
According to data by Comtrade, Finland's main export partners were Germany (11.5%), Sweden (10.7%), the U.S. (9.4%) and the Netherlands (7.1%); while the country’s imports came chiefly from Sweden (12.5%), Germany (12.3%), China (9.1%), Norway (6.9%), and Russia (6.6%). Of course, this data is publiced before the Russian attack in Ukraine. In 2024 Finland's trade with Russia is less than 1%.
Fix your facts. Finland did not surrender. And fix many more mistakes in this video after fixing the first.
Obviously, this is one of the AI-generated videos, and no human has bothered to check ANY of the facts. I would not call this an "in-depth analysis".
Finns never give up. The Russians could occupy Finland, but the guerrilla war would continue for decades. A small, united nation cannot be defeated.
I'm from Finland 🇫🇮🇫🇮🇫🇮 Finland Finland Finland 🇫🇮🇫🇮🇫🇮
1:04 love it, the city where my mother's parents were born, and where I had ancestors at least already in the 15th century.
In the picture Viborg is illustrated now in Russia 🇷🇺 landgrab grab by Soviet kept by Russia 🇷🇺 found by Sweden 🇸🇪 in the year 1295 - almost 500 years before St Petersburg
Russia -> can you see our middle finger? We faith with love and agry - nice coctail.
So many facts are wrong.Makes you wonder how is it even possible.
That naval ship was on the Neva river St. Pertersburg russia. And the ski patrol with ak's was somewhere from old eastblock too. Uniforms, helmets, guns, etc...
😂😂😂..
These soldiers on skies was absolutely not Finnish 😂😂... Look at how they skied and they had a strange looking commo aswell
I noticed the same. Rather wobbly skiers.
Yes, let's start! What are we waiting for anymore!
what about finland's 900k person reserve
This video has LOTS of history holes in it! Look for facts ELSEWHERE.
Are you using a bot for the video? Or does your editing suck? So many random pauses in the video.
This boy needs to find an honest job,soon.
some points make this sound like it was made by AI and you told the AI that Finland is actually a country in the Southeast Europe
We also will have four pohjanmaa class multipurpose corvets in future for our navy
You also neglect totally the anti-aircraft rocket units
Take back Karjala.
No. Vast majority of Finns escaped inside current borders and the current Karjala has been ravaged by russian policies. To bring them back to Finnish standards would be way too expensive. Why would we ever want to capture and rebuild area like that?
@@kilppa Because it is historical finnish territory.
@@reekwind1294 Exactly. If we don't want our Karelia back it encourages Russia to try to take more.
Karelian Ukrainians are working on that.
Can you guys stop with making threatening titles against Russia? I get that it's a easy way to get clicks, but i don't and i don't think anybody else here wants out defense forces to be associated with "NATO's new crazy frontlines against Russia" as if we are going to war. If something happens, yes, the finnish defense forces are ready to fight and defend our country. But just, please, this is the perfect video title to attract Russian propaganda bots.
What in the gods name are you blabbering 😂
Happy that Nato join us
Suomi perkele
Is finland have nuclear
No
finland has atleast 100 nuclear weapons and getting more all the time
@@Maysti87what the guy is yapping 😂
Finland now has nuclear weapons, my russian friend.,
❤
Финляндия это Россия финны это русские😁😁😁😁
So wrong. Very different ppl, very different languages, very different cultures etc.
By the way Finland was directly a part of Sweden.
Ruski terrorist kohta tulee aika kun palautamme Karjalan Suomineidon uumalle Valmistautukaa Ruski terroristi hakemaan Suomen passeja olette osa Suur-Suomea Ruski on ihmisjätettä terroristi valtio sota rikollinen turha huudella ydinaseista Ruski voi olla varma että kaikki NATON ydinaseet on suunnattu kohti venäjää siinä katoaa myös venäjä ja jos vanhat merkit ja videot Ukrainasta näyttävät että venäjällä asevoimat on Kaluston puolesta n1950 luvulta niin todennäkösesti Ruski Ydinkärjet räjähtää laukasu hetkellä siiloihin😂😂 meiltä voi aina vaatia mutta paha tulla ottamaan Ruski säälittävä valtio missä ei ole edes ihmioikeuksi mitään ei saa sanoa venäjällä valtio sulkee ja määrää kaikesta youtube sun muut on suht kiellettyjä kun isäaurinkoinen Hitler putina laatii lakejaan ja venäjän lampaat nöyrästi tottelee😂 Perkele sanon minä en ole tyhmempiä ihmisiä näyhyt kuin venäläiset aivopestyt jätteet
Never, try come at us
Wow, try come to Finland
@@jman4538 ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Nulandyachtclub1910.jpg
Finnish military power??? Do you have a brain?
What are you saying? Are you saying that Finland dont have any firepower? They say "many country have an army, but Finland is an army having a country". Also have bombshelters and nuclear shelters to about every citizen. Of course country only 5.5 million can fo so much, but Finland is pushing way above it weight class. That finnish military power, you questioned, is builded in a method of "total defence", and pretty much means that any country who planning attack, can find costs overwhelming compared to benefits. So u have to do your homework before commenting. Also for show some respect is not a bad, unless youre a troll. Finland. Worlds happiest country for 7 years in a row.
@@phm19880 Go to the website of the Finnish army and see for yourself the strength of the Finnish army.
Start to study what Finland has.Apparently you don't know much about Finland.
No russia is not biggest trading partner.. UK and US are bigger. You must have old data bf war
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Is education illegal in your country?