Why Nike Sucks Right Now

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,8 тис.

  • @micaelerykosoquila9575
    @micaelerykosoquila9575 2 місяці тому +683

    Nike’s MO for selling shoes
    1. Sign all the biggest athletes
    2. Make collabs
    3. Rely on nostalgia

    • @theinnocentturtle1236
      @theinnocentturtle1236 2 місяці тому +17

      @@micaelerykosoquila9575 4. side with politics specially wokeism

    • @Mister_Phafanapolis
      @Mister_Phafanapolis 2 місяці тому +16

      I love when they re-release a dad shoe from 40 years ago in a _slightly_ different color combination and the sneakerheads slip and slide in a pool of their own jizz talking about how amazing, revolutionary, never before seen it is, and how it is a must cop, must bot, must Klarna purchase.

    • @thepiratepenguin_
      @thepiratepenguin_ 2 місяці тому +25

      @@theinnocentturtle1236 you like Jordan Peterson, your opinion isn’t valid.

    • @theinnocentturtle1236
      @theinnocentturtle1236 2 місяці тому +5

      @@thepiratepenguin_ Because maybe you're not smart enough to understand.

    • @shuozhai3745
      @shuozhai3745 2 місяці тому +1

      collabs aren’t that good😅

  • @itstoonbruh
    @itstoonbruh 2 місяці тому +443

    The problem is the 90’s kids grew up and realized that the product we’re getting now is trash. And don’t wanna pay double for a worst product

    • @Shay416
      @Shay416 2 місяці тому +22

      Legit.

    • @rks5457
      @rks5457 2 місяці тому +16

      Bought some vapormax/97's a few years back and moisture started building in the air bubbles then the right heel bubble popped within a month. Sent it back, got another and the right front bubble popped within a week lmao.

    • @Benwikimedia
      @Benwikimedia 2 місяці тому +1

      100

    • @itstoonbruh
      @itstoonbruh 2 місяці тому

      @@rks5457 and our OG shoes still perform

    • @Soggy-Soy-Toy
      @Soggy-Soy-Toy 2 місяці тому +26

      @@itstoonbruh I’d rather spend $600 on real leather shoes for (dress/work/leisure) than spend $100 every year for foam glued to fake leather

  • @jaimeh8246
    @jaimeh8246 3 місяці тому +1205

    Nike went downhill as soon as it stopped caring about pushing boundaries and innovation and focused more on trends and hype. Sad to see really.

    • @murph6253
      @murph6253 3 місяці тому +46

      Facts, Nike is more concerned will collaborations with celebrities then actually innovating and implementing technology into its products. Something else that bothers me about Nike is when they have tech that really works for a shoe line they abandon it the next whether it be materials, design, cushion, grip pattern etc it’s like they change it just to change it without considering if they should change it.

    • @berlingray8058
      @berlingray8058 2 місяці тому +14

      They had to do it bc Adidas was gaining too much ground too fast (2015-mid 2017) When Virgil dropped in 2017 that’s when they gained their influence back

    • @Sambam1981
      @Sambam1981 2 місяці тому +13

      Yea seems like they care more about the Travis stuff and retros, but they don’t know it’s killing the company if you just focus on that. They don’t make any good basketball or running shoes anymore. Shoes that you can actually wear for running and basketball and not to just look good

    • @pwang33ece
      @pwang33ece 2 місяці тому +12

      The thing is, they're big enough to do both; drive collabs, trends and build amazing products others can't. They chose to focus on hype and cut everywhere else thinking they can just phone it in and still rake in the cash. I'm glad they're getting a rude awakening now.

    • @artjoeylarena481
      @artjoeylarena481 2 місяці тому

      @@jaimeh8246 real😢😢😢

  • @midispunishment
    @midispunishment 2 місяці тому +205

    It’s about time Nike got called out. Their shoes have been trash for years.

    • @slidecontrol134
      @slidecontrol134 2 місяці тому

      I've been trying to for years but they've probably muted my twitter. Every prediction and jab became true.

    • @securitybase3430
      @securitybase3430 13 днів тому

      ​​@@midispunishment Nike is always coming with the same old played out technology. You couldn't pay me to wear Nike. I love the Old Skool New Balance Grey line & Adidas Boost. Nike is 🗑 🚮

  • @Cooj11
    @Cooj11 3 місяці тому +1559

    still pisses me off to this day that the kobe line is so hard to get

    • @markflores6104
      @markflores6104 3 місяці тому +77

      @@Cooj11 Missed those days when Kobe is atill alive and playing those Mamba shoes are so awesome.

    • @jordanhall8739
      @jordanhall8739 3 місяці тому +185

      It’s Nike’s fault. There is no reason they shouldn’t have been made widely available by now.

    • @BabayaGuns
      @BabayaGuns 3 місяці тому +21

      Same man , I had to get my first pair through a reseller and only got to cop retail with the girl dad . I like the girl dad but the damn glue stain just pissed me off . They make it widely available but the quality is bad

    • @long8888
      @long8888 2 місяці тому

      Product cannibalization….nobody would buy shitty Ja1, Book1, Tatums, Zions, so on and so forth.

    • @DMVBLACK
      @DMVBLACK 2 місяці тому +42

      That’s because you waited till the man passed before you decided to cop a pair. Before his passing they were always in stock

  • @arvincabugnason6728
    @arvincabugnason6728 2 місяці тому +37

    Nike is leaning towards more on, "f*ck boy" design trends rather than actual tech and durability for their shoes. They had become an expensive try hard sports shoes

    • @biobelewilliam-west1310
      @biobelewilliam-west1310 Місяць тому +1

      I think you hit that on the nail

    • @ThomasWake1
      @ThomasWake1 22 дні тому +1

      They’re more of a pseudo fashion brand now that poor ppl wear to look rich

  • @SavNJ
    @SavNJ 3 місяці тому +333

    Nike for close to a decade now has been phoning it in and relying on retros/remakes of what has worked in the past.
    Even down to the USA basketball collection now is just screen printed shirts, some shoes, and shorts. Back in the day they released everything from bags, to socks, to the actual jerseys players wore.

    • @jordanhall8739
      @jordanhall8739 3 місяці тому +16

      That’s true this year’s USA collection is terrible compared to what they released in 2012.

    • @bzomeful
      @bzomeful 2 місяці тому +3

      Interestingly, I’ve heard that a lot of the times, it is very difficult to purchase athlete/player Olympic kits for any sport. The reason given is that being chosen to represent your country at the Olympics is such an honour that any uniforms/jersey designs worn are limited to the actual athletes that are going to be there.

    • @Mister_Phafanapolis
      @Mister_Phafanapolis 2 місяці тому +3

      ​@@bzomeful Doesn't sound like Nike to miss an opportunity to monetize a happening.

    • @TGFIFTY5
      @TGFIFTY5 2 місяці тому

      @@jordanhall8739 I just got a Nike notification for team usa basketball and looked through the store and thought the same thing. It’s literally just a team usa shirt with ‘Paris’ on the sleeve in basic block font. Just no effort

    • @warmongeryt1458
      @warmongeryt1458 20 днів тому

      Exactly I remember they had unique basketball shorts, the elite socks with cushions in them great innovative basketball shoes with unique styles, that had great benefits, string bags, back packs, Duffle bags, their own line of shorts and had different designs and textures now all I see is like 1 or 2 pair of dry fit shorts, the rest are super short cotton shorts same bland shirts, basketball shoes all literally look the same and are all low top Ja 1s, Lebrons, KDs, Booker 1s, and the rest of them no ankle support, simple designed shoes, no foam or special insoles, no boost on the outsoles, they just ice them up and slap a nike sign on the side along with a 200 dollar price tag not even worth Buting their product

  • @rantsofedub
    @rantsofedub 2 місяці тому +28

    It's been years since I've walked into a Nike store and actually spot something I want to buy. It's a complete waste of time browsing their shoe shelves because anything remotely interesting is not there.

    • @IblewuponyourfaceIII
      @IblewuponyourfaceIII 2 місяці тому +3

      Cause they sell all the good stuff to resellers & backdooring with the employees. By the time the average or even the up to date consumer walks in, all you have are the undesirables 😂 Literally the Nike story in Manhattan is a joke. We’re talking about 5th avenue & they barely have anything worth buying it’s crazy. I remember some UA-camr talked about that Nike story was backdooring & selling above retail to resellers so they can sell it for even more to morons to buy.

  • @bonzithefonzi
    @bonzithefonzi 3 місяці тому +255

    Gotta respect the brutal honesty from you. Not many would share their critical opinions on a huge corporation like nike. Truly a sneakerhead og

    • @thegameneededme5
      @thegameneededme5 2 місяці тому +20

      Agreed. Especially when he’s had products sent to him by Nike/JB before. Yet he still tells it like it is.

  • @WhatevrNevrmnd
    @WhatevrNevrmnd 2 місяці тому +71

    I have over 10 years (2006 -2017) of working Foot locker and Nike retail and I could see the quality in all products drastically drop while prices are going up. Their whole "technology" push is BS... They don't even embroider the swoosh on their clothing anymore. So tell me...if my heat pressed Nike Swoosh falls off my $200 Tech fleece...is it even worth it? They're trying to rely on nostalgia and retros, meanwhile Adidas is at least taking creative chances. New Balance is kicking their ass in lifestyle and companies like Hoka, Asics etc are on their necks for running.
    It's over Johnny!

    • @Mister_Phafanapolis
      @Mister_Phafanapolis 2 місяці тому +17

      A $200 tech fleece is never worth it, embroidered logo or not. It's a bunch of plastic that cost them pennies on the dollar to produce.

    • @WhatevrNevrmnd
      @WhatevrNevrmnd 2 місяці тому +4

      @@Mister_Phafanapolis true…. But at least let me have a logo that’ll outlive the life of the garment. They’re doing the same with MLB jerseys. Nothing premium about that thin ass material.

    •  2 місяці тому +2

      So True! I totally agree, that embroidery thing is outrageous!

    • @coreywharton6494
      @coreywharton6494 2 місяці тому

      Facts just bought some running gear from their site and the swoosh fell off like a week later. I had to press it back on!

    • @RayLindberg-y9v
      @RayLindberg-y9v 2 місяці тому +5

      couldn't agree more, I have Nike apparel from 2008-2012 still going strong, with embroidery and the like, and the stuff bought within last 5 years is complete trash. Shame what they did to the ACG line.

  • @jakej722
    @jakej722 2 місяці тому +46

    Nike annoys me. Their artificial scarcity strategy with the Kobe line has never made me want to chase them down for some crazy aftermarket price- it just makes me look at other brands because I find it to be a cheap marketing ploy.

  • @TituzzzD
    @TituzzzD 2 місяці тому +11

    I watched for some reason a lot of those "Nikes Downfall" videos. And this is the first one, that actually explains the problem: dumping down because of margins. Thank you.

  • @airtec87
    @airtec87 2 місяці тому +228

    The reason why bball shoes were more popular then in the 80s and 90s is simply due to the fact that they could be worn off court casually. You cant do that today with todays plastic shoes, they look way too bball focused, and cheap.

    • @heybrowhatup
      @heybrowhatup 2 місяці тому +38

      I agree. The designs got too sporty over the years and only look like a court shoe.

    • @kingjulien9525
      @kingjulien9525 2 місяці тому +41

      I remember those days... The same sneaker was worn from school, to the court, to party. 😷🤣😂.

    • @rantsofedub
      @rantsofedub 2 місяці тому +11

      Yes and no.. I mean running shoes are super techy too but managed to thrive in the fashion space with collabs with fashion brands.

    • @airtec87
      @airtec87 2 місяці тому +16

      @@rantsofedub depends on what running shoes you are speaking of, a lot of those "running" shoes are actually considered lifestyle and are seperate from that companies true running line, in example the 99x series from New Balance.

    • @misanthropist3
      @misanthropist3 2 місяці тому +7

      True, they don't use real leather or quality materials anymore.

  • @natek8424
    @natek8424 2 місяці тому +16

    Nike’s reputation is built upon being at the cutting edge of performance. Anything that strays away from that history and culture is a disappointment to the consumer!

  • @DevinPosey20
    @DevinPosey20 3 місяці тому +330

    Nike sucks because there a greedy ass company that has been nothing but reselling the same shoe but in worse quality and hasn’t really been making good colorway outside of a few collabs

    • @mingchi1855
      @mingchi1855 3 місяці тому +23

      And all the good ones are super expensive and limited quantity and bought out by resellers who jack up the price even more.

    • @airtec87
      @airtec87 2 місяці тому +11

      U think the quality is bad today you should have seen retros from 2004-15. They realllllly didnt give two shi. back then. The only time retros were good as or close to OGs was 1994 - 2001. Starting with the first run of Jordan 1 highs, all the way to the bred 11s that retroed for the first time.

    • @12Messenger
      @12Messenger 2 місяці тому +6

      Don't give your money to them. I haven't since the KD 14s. I mean I bought some compression pants and shorts since but shoes, no.
      We're rewarding them for not giving their all.

    • @airtec87
      @airtec87 2 місяці тому

      @@12Messenger the last modern nike bball shoe i bought brand new retail was the lebron 7s.

    • @futureguy
      @futureguy 2 місяці тому +5

      Similar things happen to a lot of large companies. Once they become large enough, they lose the motivations and initiatives to innovate since they already have large market shares. And typically the CEOs are not domain experts but good at "management". They care about stock prices, making more moneys, etc. much more than pleasing customers.

  • @gerichorico7836
    @gerichorico7836 2 місяці тому +14

    This is spot on! Nike has been hiring designers handcuffed by budget and profit margins. The quality and innovation is gone. I have had to return two Invincibles running shoes cuz the glue won’t hold up just after 4 months. Everything today feel like the $64.99-$74.99 shoe lines of the 90’s and early 2000’s, but priced at $150-$200! It’s ridiculous how they would release a lot of these shoes today!

  • @binswap
    @binswap 3 місяці тому +74

    I’m glad you’re using your platform to bring awareness to this problem Nike has had for a long time

  • @vonald
    @vonald 2 місяці тому +6

    mentioned straight facts. I would love a pt.2 where you give your opinion on them pushing towards to hype instead of innovation. SNKRS app/Resellers have completely taken the fun of out being a sneakerhead for me.

  • @nesto42
    @nesto42 2 місяці тому +53

    This is why I appreciate your channel. It goes beyond fit looks, material conversations and close ups. Your channel is for people like me who love the culture as much as the product. OG talk. Keep doing what you do, man. I am thankful for you and your girl.

    • @C-Thunder
      @C-Thunder 2 місяці тому

      Add on to this, never ever change Chris!

  • @morgan8514
    @morgan8514 2 місяці тому +20

    I’ve been seeing it at the gym too. That people are going away from Nike for workout clothes and running shoes to brands that specialize more in those areas.

  • @samaantree
    @samaantree 3 місяці тому +52

    My biggest issue with Nike is that all their innovative “cool” designs come at an exorbitant cost especially the clothing, if I want to spend £300 on some casual trousers (pants) I would buy from Dolce Gabbana. All the cool things you can produce are supposed to be done to keep you ahead of your competition not rob customers of their money. Those book 1’s look boring as hell.

    • @elusana
      @elusana 2 місяці тому +3

      d&g is worse

    • @andyscoming4919
      @andyscoming4919 2 місяці тому +1

      @@elusana that’s what I’m saying 😂 so many better things you can spend $300 on than D&G or some Gucci/LV lol

    • @Mister_Phafanapolis
      @Mister_Phafanapolis 2 місяці тому

      Dolce Gabbana is a deep cut. Rappers can't pronounce it and therefore don't put it in their songs.

    • @cassandraclark5499
      @cassandraclark5499 2 місяці тому

      I hate them ugly 💩’s

  • @MrAbstractj
    @MrAbstractj 2 місяці тому +6

    The other problem is the nice shoes that you want to buy and wear are all cornered by the after market resellers that uses bots to gobble them up for resell. The regular consumers are pushed out of the market or aren’t willing to pay the markups.

  • @deejaay
    @deejaay 3 місяці тому +76

    Nostalgia when I saw the Eastbay page with Penny

  • @Chris-zn1qg
    @Chris-zn1qg 2 місяці тому +5

    You're so right!
    Also the thing you said in another video, that all Nike's tend to force the big toes in an unnatural direction really makes me mad. Apart from the Sabrina 1's i can't wear any Nike hoop shoe because of that. It feels so uncomfortable.

  • @Fab5Hill33
    @Fab5Hill33 3 місяці тому +163

    FACTS DON'T HAVE FEELINGS 💪💪💪

  • @chrisfournier6144
    @chrisfournier6144 2 місяці тому +3

    Nike used to make sports shoes. Now they make pop culture footwear with a sports theme.

  • @veryfewrealleft1405
    @veryfewrealleft1405 3 місяці тому +213

    Book 1 & All Nike Basketball Right now is uninspired & completely unimaginative.
    We talked about this in comments or typed about it one day. Chris Nike is the biggest reseller with the biggest profit margin.

    • @deejaay
      @deejaay 2 місяці тому

      replying to @veryfewrealleft1405 "Book 1 & All Nike Basketball Right now is uninspired & completely unimaginative. "
      We talked about this in comments or typed about it one day. Chris Nike is the biggest reseller with the biggest profit margin."
      Also, with Nike they're over killing it with these "inspiration" designs, collabs and releasing limited quantities only to find the shoe reselling 300% above retail. I'm like fuck it, I'll just get Reps (Kobes), Li-Ning and Anta......

    • @static1217
      @static1217 2 місяці тому +5

      Book 1's are clean. But to each their own.

    • @veryfewrealleft1405
      @veryfewrealleft1405 2 місяці тому

      @@static1217
      They’re very clean. Just very familiar.

    • @WalkingWallet
      @WalkingWallet 2 місяці тому +5

      ​@static1217 it's a basic shoe bruh

    • @Dmac4Ever
      @Dmac4Ever 2 місяці тому

      @@WalkingWalletI like how it looks basic it just doesn’t play as well, but the Giannis 5’s and some of the other ones just aren’t very imaginative or as technically impressive for sure so I kinda agree with both statements tbh

  • @ahmadlittle-hannibal7153
    @ahmadlittle-hannibal7153 2 місяці тому +2

    WearTesters stay with the archives on deck. This is Nike Nostalgia that early 00s to the mid 00s was so creative for Nike. Shaped me into my steez till this day

  • @mainsourcery
    @mainsourcery 3 місяці тому +81

    Wow the AF25. I had like 4 pairs of those. What a time.

    • @MrRashad8869
      @MrRashad8869 3 місяці тому +3

      Such a great shoe. The color ways were so good combined with comfort

    • @vikramreddy6001
      @vikramreddy6001 3 місяці тому +1

      picked up an AF25 colorway on eBay a few years ago that I got at the outlets when I was 7, to this day one of my favorite sneakers

    • @emwebb10
      @emwebb10 2 місяці тому

      Had a pair, would love if they retro these

    • @jp86jp
      @jp86jp 2 місяці тому

      had never seen them before today, but now I think they're gorgeous

    • @sidvicious647
      @sidvicious647 2 місяці тому

      Still got a pair in Storage NEVER WORN ! Was a helluva shoe !

  • @hiratiomasterson4009
    @hiratiomasterson4009 2 місяці тому +22

    Nike simply has too many MBAs who look at immediate ROI - that worked for a time, but when you over saturate a market with products that have been built down to a price rather than up to a standard, you leave yourself open to people eventually waking up to reality.

    • @javierlandaverde4108
      @javierlandaverde4108 27 днів тому

      I always think of it as profit margins. Nike simply wants to reduce the expenses and cost of manufacturing the shoe while driving the cost up so they can compensate the loss and make a solid profit off from the shoe. If one cost you $40 to make from sourcing the materials and cheap labor where they are made while putting them to retail for $140. They are making a good $100 profit from that shoe. Just an example. This business model won't last you long and you start to decrease your brand value as consumers will end going a different route and brand.

  • @rellswrld
    @rellswrld 3 місяці тому +143

    Nike needs to go ahead and hire you as a consultant. Never understood why they don’t tap into the real world in this way.

    • @jesussinaloa9300
      @jesussinaloa9300 2 місяці тому +8

      The channel would loose credibility if he was hired by a sneaker brand. He got to get partnerships outside of shoes but still related like shoe cleaning utensils that are applicable to any shoe brand

    • @rellswrld
      @rellswrld 2 місяці тому

      @@jesussinaloa9300 fam if he gets a Nike deal he should put his channel on ice or work on other things. That would be a huge deal for him and his future

    • @nickalbenga9750
      @nickalbenga9750 2 місяці тому +14

      I actually used to bring up this channel all the time during meetings at Nike/Jordan. Not to consult, but as a barometer of authenticity in the community.

    • @SpiritualSeeker12x12
      @SpiritualSeeker12x12 2 місяці тому +7

      Old news they won't do it, especially if they are firing those who have great minds like 😤🤦🏾‍♂️Chris and those who care about the brand they love

    • @nikchris69
      @nikchris69 2 місяці тому

      You can’t be serious.

  • @imacat123
    @imacat123 2 місяці тому +2

    I was travelling in Japan, walking around in my Nikes, and I love em but I couldn't help but notice foreigners and travelers there and the locals wearing brands such as QC or Hoka. I sold my Nike stock once I returned.

    • @SingaporeUntold
      @SingaporeUntold 2 місяці тому

      For sure. I’ll be getting hoka next to replace my new balance.

    • @mike_b777
      @mike_b777 3 дні тому

      @imacat123 QC? Do you mean On? It's a running shoe brand.

  • @BcTwistedSound
    @BcTwistedSound 2 місяці тому +31

    This is why I love this channel- the truth.
    Nikes gotta stop this “hunger marketing” and “shrinkflation” before losing it all, people care and are tired of not able to get the best ( or at a ridiculous price) yet settled for the worse.

    • @tylerdurden6335
      @tylerdurden6335 2 місяці тому +1

      1000%

    • @javierlandaverde4108
      @javierlandaverde4108 27 днів тому

      Too late, people already switching up soo fast now. Nike fans went to Adidas or New Balance to ASICS now to some going to Under Armour now.

  • @KROMO50
    @KROMO50 2 місяці тому +1

    I'm not even a sneaker fan, but you are making some good points. Good video

  • @ll1ll1ll1ll1ll
    @ll1ll1ll1ll1ll 2 місяці тому +11

    Damn. I thought I was the only one who remembered the AF25. Godlike shoe.
    2006 was the same year we got the Jordan 21, the LeBron 4, and the Kobe 1. And the next couple years would bring the Jordan 22 & 23, the LeBron 5 & 6, the Kobe 2, and the Soldier 1. Nike was absolutely cooking in the 2000s, to a level they've never cooked since.

  • @juventus6245
    @juventus6245 2 місяці тому +2

    Big respect to this channel to call it out. Nike been doing this for maybe a decade. I’m looking to other sneaker brands to shatter Nike in this industry.

  • @isaiahfernandez4162
    @isaiahfernandez4162 3 місяці тому +47

    Wow Chris you really cooked on Nike in this video. Great editorial video: your passion as a sneakerhead and your encyclopedic knowledge shines through here. Props!

  • @cuthomas4664
    @cuthomas4664 2 місяці тому +1

    I'm a hobby runner, don't understand much about basketball shoes; but I think you are the best in shoes review in general. Keep going!

  • @qchang09
    @qchang09 3 місяці тому +15

    Thank you for the shout out for the Nike Air Command Force. I bought those in '91 and they are still my favorite shoe in terms of quality materials, more than any Jordan model

  • @carlosdcpcg
    @carlosdcpcg Місяць тому +1

    1:32 Oh brother you hit all the nostalgic tingles from the good ol days comong home from school login & checking all the heat that was to come. Good Days. ❤

  • @kirbyaugustine761
    @kirbyaugustine761 2 місяці тому +28

    Sign of the times. Most of these corporations today have made the decision of choosing profits over people. Simple corporate greed.

    • @AyjayAlleyway
      @AyjayAlleyway 2 місяці тому

      Nike’s net profit margin is unchanged for over 20 years. Stop talking out of your @zz.

  • @giorgosapo4508
    @giorgosapo4508 2 місяці тому +1

    Chris I remember those days like it was yesterday, everyone was hyped about this Second Coming project and even the Soundtrack by Juelz Santana was amazing. I remember having the Premium All Leather version of these bad boys. We used to be buying all the Sole Collector magazines, getting anxious with every release not only on the Signature lines which were innovative with designers like Eric Avar , Tinker Hatfield, Ken Link and D'Wayne Edwards but the Team shoe lines like the Hyperdunk back in 2008 were pushing the boundaries as well with tech like Lunar foam and the OG Flywire. We all miss those days , we lost our passion and interest!

  • @taivo2520
    @taivo2520 2 місяці тому +17

    The greed got them good!
    I have relative who is working in Nike’s Manufacturers in Vietnam…She told me every shoes from Nike, especially her department is responsible for “Premium Line”, a final already for sale and labor costs. Total is around $20 - $30 to make.
    This is “Premium Line”, I don’t know how low the cost of “Budget Line” will go…

    • @MilkInTheBowl
      @MilkInTheBowl 2 місяці тому

      @@taivo2520 that’s the production cost though. The majority of clothing companies money goes into marketing and also in Nike’s case; player acquisition. The markup is still crazy I agree. I’m just pointing out that the cost of production for shoes and clothing is always the cheapest part. Marketing is where the real expense lies and of course R&D isn’t cheap either even though they seem to be phoning that in lately.

    • @taivo2520
      @taivo2520 2 місяці тому +5

      @@MilkInTheBowl I know, but with $20-$30 cost and the materials are not hard to source like they were back then, why Nike lower the quality of their products like what we’re having nowadays?
      Greed is the best answer.

  • @Organic_Lindo
    @Organic_Lindo 2 місяці тому +1

    Great video, I remember I bought the all black suede AF 25’s with the crocodile textured leather pattern on the back… complete head turners, I shelved high end shoes like Pradas to wear those to stunt because they were so stunning with great craftsmanship and more importantly, because they were incredibly comfortable. Wore them joints into the ground lol, would still wear them today because ALL THE MATERIALS HELD UP but they squeak and are pretty much biscuits at this point.

  • @darwinmoresco7724
    @darwinmoresco7724 3 місяці тому +52

    That is why I purchase Nike shoes when it is in the outlet shelves not to purchase on its original price or srp.

    • @lionelgrisbane
      @lionelgrisbane 2 місяці тому +8

      Yep. Almost never purchased Nike anymore but I recently got Lebron 21 because it was $80 instead of $200. They’re worth $80.

    • @nikchris69
      @nikchris69 2 місяці тому +6

      This is why I purchase new balance and adidas.

  • @greyhawk4911
    @greyhawk4911 2 місяці тому +1

    I been realized that Bro Bro after we wasn’t able too buy releases no more…the shoes fit different they not comfortable….only Jordan’s extremely comfortable are the new retro 4’s made in that SB form which means great material

  • @tonygonzales8139
    @tonygonzales8139 3 місяці тому +12

    06’ Nike battleground was so great and there was so much parody in the game back then Reebok had AI and the above the rim shoes, Adidas had a great line up of players T-Mac, KG, Duncan, Billups eventually DRose, Converse had DWade, and Nike/Jordan the pinnacle of greatness! I noticed when the countdown packs the shoes seemed to look cheap and were flimsy AF then The 09’ Space Jam came out then I knew Jordan were expensive Payless shoes

  • @klozher38
    @klozher38 2 місяці тому +1

    I have over 20 of these 25's and have hyped them up since Kick's On Court Days so very cool to see the shoe being showcased. These are craze comfortable with the Max Heel unit and full length Zoom running atop the heel unit. Those kicks saved my legs

  • @brauprx
    @brauprx 3 місяці тому +7

    This is the kind of videos that only Weartesters gives us, spitting facts and talking straight. I used to love Nike Basketball products, specially in that timeframe from the 90s and early 2000's. Just as you said Chris, all first signature shoes back in the day were packed with tech, the Flight Fives, the Shox VC, the Zoom Generation, The Zoom Kobe 1, and the "team" models were elite as well: Air Max Uptempos, both Zoom Huaraches, Shox BB, and the list goes on. I guess the KD I was the first when they got cheap and from that point we got bad performers with almost no tech, like the Kyrie 1, the Zoom Freak 1 (I'll give the PG 1 a pass because at least those had a regular size oval Zoom unit and a few colorways had decent materials). Nowadays with this trend of making shoes ready to go right from the box (for consumers only) and with lighter (but flimpsier) materials, they justify their cheap approach not giving us quality products, supposedly inspired by the greatest players. Chinese brands grew from copycats to innovative amazingly, and most of the times (with some exceptions like the WoW main line or the JB) those are at least at the same price with better tech and materials. Just as you said, Nike has turned into a retro (almost knock-off of themselves) brand with no innovation at all.
    For the QoTD: Sadly I sold my AJ3 black cements from 2018 because of a need of money to pay meds, but If I have to choose one cement only, it would be the white cement 3s. I really enjoy a lot these videos man, thank you!

  • @ownyourmasters7890
    @ownyourmasters7890 2 місяці тому +1

    Resale market has done major damage to the sneaker retail game and these sneaker companies have used that to raise the value of their merchandise.

  • @dustymetzgar3006
    @dustymetzgar3006 3 місяці тому +21

    It'll stop when we get over the FOMO and stop buying. But it ain't going to happen in the year that Jordan turns 40.

    • @jcolley82
      @jcolley82 2 місяці тому

      2025 is gonna be nuts with all the Retros coming out

    • @Thatboygtmike
      @Thatboygtmike 2 місяці тому +1

      It’s happening hopefully. Slowly but surely imo.

  • @brandonyttri459
    @brandonyttri459 Місяць тому +1

    I had these EXACT AF 25's back in the day, absolutely loved them. Moved to New Balance Two Wxy v3 last year, had N3xt L3vl3s before those....can't see myself going back to Nike anytime soon.

  • @DK_Raiders117
    @DK_Raiders117 3 місяці тому +6

    Chris and the Weartesters family is THE go to source for sneakerheads. 🙌🏼👍🏼💯

  • @elijahdelacruz3204
    @elijahdelacruz3204 2 місяці тому +1

    You can also fastforward to 2003 and 2006, when Lebron’s and Kobe’s first signature shoes with Nike released. Both offered Nike’s best at the time. The Lebrons had quality leather and full length zoom plus a double stacked zoom unit in the heel if I’m not mistaken, and a carbon fiber shank. The Kobes also had quality leather, a zoom unit in the heel, and a zoom met bag in the forefoot, and a carbon fiber shank plate

  • @ananimizyouser1429
    @ananimizyouser1429 3 місяці тому +8

    I agree with you Wing. The tiered signatures and veering away from packs i.e. the All Star, Xmas are also why. As far as the tiers i remember when the signature hoops athlete had a great looking silhouette with tech for that playstyle. Now Nike does "price-point" marketing where you get cushioning in either the heel or forefoot but rarely both.
    In the 90's Nike was at its peak when they had to try to overtake Reebok. It seems like they dissolved the Alpha Project line and then coasted and they got too comfortable. Then they strip away the tech when they retro the beloved models. The cost cutting they do is costing them.

  • @mikeTDE
    @mikeTDE 2 місяці тому +2

    You’d think with the abundance of different e-commerce companies who make workout/clothing gear, Nike would step their QC game up with their clothing. Playing the lottery every time I order a Nike product these days. I don’t know if the size will be off, clothing quality, fabric, etc.

  • @TheDDA
    @TheDDA 2 місяці тому +15

    All Nike is is the most over priced REP company. They make knockoffs of OG shoes that never live up to shape, material or innovation. Overpriced plastic leather aint the stuff dreams are made of.

  • @DanielJamesEgan
    @DanielJamesEgan 2 місяці тому +1

    I love going to thrift stores and getting sweet vintage-ish basketball shoes for like $8. The only problem comes when you actually try to ball with them and the entire sole comes unglued.

  • @deemoney1054
    @deemoney1054 2 місяці тому +1

    I give you your props!! You have been able to keep my attention for years!....others copy you to no avail..... especially the Instagram dorks...... you're the Champ!...... Thanks!

  • @WHITEPERSUAS1ON
    @WHITEPERSUAS1ON 3 місяці тому +15

    Maybe its just me getting older but I dont really care about sneakers like I used to. I bought at least a new hoop shoe every year but havent really even wanted to anymore. Idk if its the price or more competition or what. Harden 7 and 8s have been the only thing I've found interesting lately

    • @yeshuarc
      @yeshuarc 3 місяці тому

      What do you think about the AE1s? Those are the only basketball shoes besides Kobes that have been hyped crazy

    • @johncarolina4950
      @johncarolina4950 2 місяці тому

      @@yeshuarcI disliked it at first but I've come around. I'm getting the low model that comes out this month. The only thing I dislike now is the weight.

  • @jeffhicks8428
    @jeffhicks8428 2 місяці тому +4

    No offense buddy but "air" was nothing but another shoe industry gimmick that added absolutely zero to any shoe in terms of objective quantifiable empirical improvement over any other cushion technology like standard EVA or any of the other brands and their gimmicky technologies like say Asics gel. There is a reason it doesn't exist anymore. Because it was pure marketing and hype. None of those shoes had anything special about them aside from massive marketing budgets and buzzwords.

  • @BobbyObado
    @BobbyObado 3 місяці тому +4

    I love this video so much, I wouldn't know where to begin. If I could pick any video for a totally brand new sneakerhead to watch in this age, it would be this one. Thank you Chris for what you continually do.

  • @michaelbush9603
    @michaelbush9603 2 місяці тому +1

    Like I said after the KD's I stopped really checking for Nike. The Kyrie's afterwards were proof I made the right decision.

  • @sunnyfallq
    @sunnyfallq 3 місяці тому +8

    Cannot agree more. The quality has dropped so much while the price tag continues to go up.

  • @kaorunootaku
    @kaorunootaku 2 місяці тому +1

    Chris being a hoop sneaker historian giving us lessons from the past

  • @sherronthejedi
    @sherronthejedi 3 місяці тому +7

    Air Force 25! So many kids in highschool had these 🔥🔥

  • @na_k
    @na_k Місяць тому

    Preciate the trip down memory lane, as I remember seeing those.
    BC3s & WC4s for me. Now out of those 2, I don't know if I could pick.

  • @veryfewrealleft1405
    @veryfewrealleft1405 3 місяці тому +11

    Even the Air Jordan two had a take down model , with the python.
    Barkley 180 Olympics had on 4th great shoe.

    • @MrRoda8143
      @MrRoda8143 3 місяці тому +1

      Great minds think alike! I wore mine too last 4th lol

    • @veryfewrealleft1405
      @veryfewrealleft1405 3 місяці тому

      @@MrRoda8143
      💯
      It’s crazy bro, how many people 40& up & under at Picnic “what are those , they’re
      🔥”
      I’d love to see more 180s , I still have the not signature, but we know that the Air Force 2 before the Alpha Force was Chucks go to.
      I still have those with Liberty Bell 🔔 on
      rear panel/heel. I went with more comfortable of the two.
      I wish they’d pay some more attention to those, & the Pippin 2. I went to buy pair of Red/White Pippen 2s, lol they were like 500.
      Smh

  • @wn5364
    @wn5364 2 місяці тому +1

    Amazing video, shows the depth of your expertise 💯💯

  • @City-iD
    @City-iD 2 місяці тому +4

    Nike executives need to watch this video and take it seriously! Everything that was said in here is 100% spot on truth. Big up Chris.👍

  • @combatbeatdown
    @combatbeatdown 2 місяці тому +2

    Honestly, ever since Nike dropped Kyrie and signed Ja Morant, and kept him even after all the allegations was hypocritical and the start of their downfall. Then they drop PG without any explanation to make way for the Book lineup, they’re just shady with their athletes. Back in the day when it was just a big 3 (Lebron, KD, Kobe lineup) was much simpler and honestly way better.

  • @TheFlako323
    @TheFlako323 3 місяці тому +14

    Couldn't agree with Chris more! I almost hate that I work at one of the retail stores and I have to try and sell Nike shoes to customers knowing that there's better options out there

  • @karubml
    @karubml 2 місяці тому +3

    they are no longer a brand with identity, they are now simply a business.

  • @charleskiser2468
    @charleskiser2468 3 місяці тому +6

    The Air Force 25 Rasheed Wallace shoe he had many pairs I wish they'd bring them back

  • @Kowsan824
    @Kowsan824 2 місяці тому +1

    Great video, love this and had to comment on it.
    This is great Chris said this and he is the 🐐

  • @AddOnKicks
    @AddOnKicks 3 місяці тому +11

    Li-Ning: let's put at least some Boom in every offering over $100 and typically in more than one zone.
    Nike: people like these Zoom strobels too much, let's put them in LESS models each year and take them out of the series we introduced them in. 🤦‍♂️

  • @AnthonyAnalog
    @AnthonyAnalog 2 місяці тому +1

    The Book 1 being a massive downgrade from the AF 25 is a perfect analogy for the Booker to Kobe "comparisons" 😂😂😂

  • @johnneyjohnson8607
    @johnneyjohnson8607 3 місяці тому +11

    I also blame being too dependent on exclusivety. I haven't been able to buy a shoe I've wanted in a year.

  • @uptodatenba
    @uptodatenba 2 місяці тому +1

    I FULLY agree. As a nike diehard basketball player i recently went out and bought a pair of DON 4s, of which would have disgusted me 2 years ago and they are now my go to shoe on the court. I love nike, and will still continue to spend my money on kobe drops but i really dont understand any of the hype around the book 1. And other people back me, seen in the immediate and rapid success of the AE1. Im just dissapointed by the clear drop of quality, and just wish i could have lived in the golden era of nike basketball

  • @veryfewrealleft1405
    @veryfewrealleft1405 3 місяці тому +4

    Great time for this vid.

  • @carlbowles1808
    @carlbowles1808 19 днів тому

    Vintage Nike styles are very popular with the young crowd. Your technical analysis is brilliant and I respect that. The young crowd only seems to care about looks and social status. I enjoyed this video immensely thank you. 👏👏👏

  • @walker2101
    @walker2101 3 місяці тому +8

    Not a shill for Nike or anything, but sometimes the consumer needs to look at themselves in the mirror.
    When Nike tried to be innovative & gave us the 720s and the Scorpion’s, everyone talked trash. When it comes to basketball shoes, the LeBron flagship model each year has EVERYTHING Nike has to offer tech-wise in them, and they go straight to outlets on the back wall. Maybe that has to do with people not rocking with LeBron the person more so than the shoe. Who know? But I see Nike doing an adequate job pushing technology in an ever changing sneaker industry. The entire basketball shoe market has changed and in this economy, everyone looks for more lifestyle type shoes that are versatile.

    • @Drew.Whitcomb
      @Drew.Whitcomb 3 місяці тому +2

      The 720s and Scorpions aren't innovation, they're casual shoes. Nike calls them running shoes, but they're not. Nike is actually doing fairly on the high end of performance running but that's not translating to other categories.
      Nike also tries to play supply and demand games with performance running which doesn't work with runners. They HATE it because they can't get the shoe they want when they want it. Many runners have fled to other brands like Asics, New Balance, and Puma because of Nike's strategies.

    • @walker2101
      @walker2101 2 місяці тому +1

      @@Drew.Whitcomb when I mentioned the 720s and Scorpions with regards to innovation, I merely meant the design and size of the Air unit. Up until that point, Nike had been accused of being boring and stagnant in their designs.
      To your 2nd point: I 100% agree with you about the supply and demand games that Nike plays with their consumers. It’s ridiculous and in my opinion, is the #1 reason loyal customers are now venturing out to other brands that offer similarly priced items with better & more premium materials. I believe that this coupled with their seemingly unwillingness to seriously address the botting community has caused a significant mistrust among consumers leading them to buy reps/UAs.
      Loyal customers are asking Nike a very simple question: Why should we be loyal to you, if you won’t reward that loyalty with fair and transparent selling practices?

    • @javierlandaverde4108
      @javierlandaverde4108 27 днів тому

      @@Drew.Whitcomb I disagree lol.. I just think running shoes now are very techy and evolving. It's a good time now to buy running shoes to run or lifestyle or to recover. I go on about NB, ASICS, Hoka's, Adidas running shoes about how their tech has change and modernize or the materials but to stick simply Nike. Alpha Fly were innovated that they got banned from marathons legally due "Offer Tech Enhancements" to make you run faster. I don't personally use Nike for running. I gear towards ASICS, Mizuno's, Hoka's or New Balance for running but people still get Nike Running lines and they are still up there in terms of innovation and modern tech like there competitors. .

  • @jans7600
    @jans7600 2 місяці тому +1

    What made me more mad was when they were selling products with the Vapormax name, like the Nike Vapormax plus, but it wasn’t Vapormax. It was just AIR MAX with no rubber sole so it looks like VaporMax.

  • @xXGoDSoN4Xx
    @xXGoDSoN4Xx 2 місяці тому +1

    Very well done vid Chris…well done 👏👏👏

  • @JJcDAmAn1
    @JJcDAmAn1 2 місяці тому +1

    It's wild to think I'm watching this video just days after it was announced Nike was laying off 732 employees from Beaverton. A lot of those laid off were experienced people, with some commenting how the Nike from seven years ago is so much more talented thanit is now

  • @lordcarnorjax8599
    @lordcarnorjax8599 Місяць тому

    My 16 yr old son had Nike Freak 3's and they served him very well on court 4 to 5 days a week till he'd out grown them. He really liked them so we got him some Freak 4's in Barely Volt colour way to replace them. The Freak 4's have been a disaster, he wore out the incredibly thin insole in week. As he's had issues with his heel's in the past got some decent orthotic insoles fitted by his podiatrist who's very very known locally and specialises in athletes. The orthotics slipped inside the shoe within a week due to the materials inside the shoe being very slippery. Podiatrist said he'd never had a issue like it before and in the end had to get the orthotics glued into Freaks so they wouldn't slip. Once we solved that within a month the shoes had gone from white with lime green to very yellow with the sweat. Have to wash them regularly to get them back to white, despite only training in them once a week now. He doesn't trust the Freaks to play a game in any more. After that we bought him some KD16's after much research and they've been very good, no issues what so ever. Thanks to Wear Testers we did feel comfortable that we wouldn't have the same issues but I find it so hard to fathom the difference in quality between one shoe model and the next by the same brand less than 12 months apart.

  • @Sean-ex8ii
    @Sean-ex8ii 2 місяці тому +1

    Damn I forgot how much I like your videos bro, keep it up

  • @m3rvs
    @m3rvs 2 місяці тому +1

    Bro! Your history about these shoes are crazy 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

  • @casualsuede
    @casualsuede 2 місяці тому

    I agree on the lack of tech. Look at who is rising, brands with comfort technology like Hoka and OnCloud.

  • @shakespace4711
    @shakespace4711 2 місяці тому

    For me, the pinnacle of Nike is the 2K4 and 2K5. I played in them in all sorts of colorways for four years during college-probably my peak too!

  • @thundercat6963
    @thundercat6963 2 місяці тому

    It's not just the tech the quality went downhill, everyone from my running group switched off of Nike running shoes. Their shoes fell apart so quickly compared to other brands. It was so bad my swish logo literally fell off my shoe mid run.

  • @celieboo
    @celieboo 2 місяці тому +1

    Right now? Nike has sucked for about 20 years. The quality has been TERRIBLE!

  • @garthmckenzie3962
    @garthmckenzie3962 2 місяці тому +1

    “Wop, wop, wop, wop, wop, Chris ****’em up!!!”
    Fantastic piece of work here.
    🤜🏽🤛🏽

  • @chrisalexander3794
    @chrisalexander3794 3 дні тому

    Biggest problem for me is drops and the sneakers app. Nike makes every shoe so limited that you cannot get it...the second it drops. This keeps resale business going and lowers Nike business.

  • @FiqNSneaks
    @FiqNSneaks 2 місяці тому

    I was doing a video on my views of this but yours makes me so happy that I might go back and do my video over again😂. I called the book 1 trash before they were broken down. Reminded me of weak version of anything amare stoudimire wore. I'm glad you used that excuse.

  • @colt5189
    @colt5189 2 місяці тому

    I never go to the fancy shoe stores in the mall anymore. As I hate having to constantly ask someone to go grab a pair from the back room so I can try them on. Trying to do that with 10-15 different shoes is a pain, so I don't bother.

  • @amenesty999
    @amenesty999 Місяць тому

    10 years ago when i went on their website particularly for basketball shoes I had excitement in me about all different models, types, player signature shoes, ID endless options etc. Now its like Im seeing 3 different shoe types with slight different variants that “scream” boredom.

  • @loganhautstudios
    @loganhautstudios Місяць тому +1

    this video should have millions of views

  • @eddie18mobile
    @eddie18mobile Місяць тому +1

    Amazing video🔥

  • @jonathanchin3396
    @jonathanchin3396 2 місяці тому

    Great X-Men T-shirt, man!
    Thanks for the trip down Memory Lane, I fell in love with Jordans and Reebok Pumps in the early '90s, it really sounds like Nike is much more interested in coasting than innovating nowadays.