same feeling plenty of sub system but its more for hiding good quality contents . i want a rpg , not a game with xxxx task that arficiel make me play longer . all i see a vast world , but not a dynamic world "sandox"
that’s sad you’re not hyped because i am fuck yeah baby! as far as bugs go i don’t give a fuck, oblivion skyrim fall out all had bugs that weren’t game breaking and actually made the game comical in away still the games were great and playable… i understand your reluctance though after the cyberpunk fiasco and many other games that come just blatantly unfinished from triple A studios, but let me tell you, Bethesda creates the most immersive RPGS i’ve ever played and i have high hopes for this one
Your comparing the cutscenes from Starfield to games like Horizon Zero dawn but the big difference is that in HZD the cut scenes are “cinematic” cut scenes which is a big difference to the way Bethesda games use cutscenes in there games. Like in Bethesda games you interact with the story and characters in a much more immersive way by seamlessly talking or interacting with a object where they are however in HZD (which I love btw) you get a more cinematic feeling like watching a movie which is cool but in a big way breaks you away from the feeling that you are actually a character in the game living the experience. Bethesda games are RPGs and the quality of what you would class as cutscenes in their game fit well with in the frame of the game. So therefore Starfield cutscenes work in the exact same way and will never match up to HZD in relation to graphics and quality. All that being said though from what I have seen from Starfield I am impressed with how the graphics/characters models are whilst interacting with in the game
While forbidden west does have cinematic cutscenes, specially in the main story events, it uses a face to face choice selection dialogue system which imo looks way better than the one starfield has, we are in 2023, I’d expect better on next gen don’t you think?
@@TimosYT I see where your coming from but I always try to base my expectations on what type of games or similar games have come before and also what type of game it is. Games like HZD, Final Fantasy franchise or Star Wars Jedi survivor for example I see as a Cinematic gaming experience and the narrative/questline is told through a main protagonist with a very linear set of options for the storyline so this allows cutscenes and even face to face interactions like HZD to have superior quality graphics. I feel like I'm watching a movie at times and whenever I play a game like this feel like wow this looks amazing! Bethesda games just like Starfield are the total opposite for me. The vast amount of customisation and details for your character, the insane amount of dialogue options as well as all the in game systems with a Bethesda game has means that I don't expect the graphics even on next gen to be on the same level as HZD. Say what you want about Bethesda but it's hard to deny they create fantastic and expansive game world's full of objects you can interact with, terrain you can travel and NPCs to talk to! I would argue that in that aspect they have the biggest open world game environments out of anyone else in the gaming industry. This along with the RPG elements all the other systems like crafting that go into their game I don't see how I could expect the graphics even next gen in 2023 to be comparable to HZD. As much as I love the HZD franchise and as massive as it is content wise it's still small compared to most Bethesda games.
Of course fighting in a spacesuit is going to be "stiff" with less possible maneuverability compared to normal clothing and atmosphere...just sayin. BUT I am with you on rather having a smaller amount of highly polished planets vs "1000+" and not really having that much confidence in Bethesda as a whole. FO4 and everything since was trash.
It not for everyone but I’m playing it
Thanks for that. I'm going to hold off on Starfield for while. Then read the reviews and make a decision.
Same here
same feeling
plenty of sub system but its more for hiding good quality contents .
i want a rpg , not a game with xxxx task that arficiel make me play longer .
all i see a vast world , but not a dynamic world "sandox"
Agreed.
that’s sad you’re not hyped because i am fuck yeah baby! as far as bugs go i don’t give a fuck, oblivion skyrim fall out all had bugs that weren’t game breaking and actually made the game comical in away still the games were great and playable… i understand your reluctance though after the cyberpunk fiasco and many other games that come just blatantly unfinished from triple A studios, but let me tell you, Bethesda creates the most immersive RPGS i’ve ever played and i have high hopes for this one
Your comparing the cutscenes from Starfield to games like Horizon Zero dawn but the big difference is that in HZD the cut scenes are “cinematic” cut scenes which is a big difference to the way Bethesda games use cutscenes in there games. Like in Bethesda games you interact with the story and characters in a much more immersive way by seamlessly talking or interacting with a object where they are however in HZD (which I love btw) you get a more cinematic feeling like watching a movie which is cool but in a big way breaks you away from the feeling that you are actually a character in the game living the experience. Bethesda games are RPGs and the quality of what you would class as cutscenes in their game fit well with in the frame of the game. So therefore Starfield cutscenes work in the exact same way and will never match up to HZD in relation to graphics and quality. All that being said though from what I have seen from Starfield I am impressed with how the graphics/characters models are whilst interacting with in the game
While forbidden west does have cinematic cutscenes, specially in the main story events, it uses a face to face choice selection dialogue system which imo looks way better than the one starfield has, we are in 2023, I’d expect better on next gen don’t you think?
@@TimosYT I see where your coming from but I always try to base my expectations on what type of games or similar games have come before and also what type of game it is. Games like HZD, Final Fantasy franchise or Star Wars Jedi survivor for example I see as a Cinematic gaming experience and the narrative/questline is told through a main protagonist with a very linear set of options for the storyline so this allows cutscenes and even face to face interactions like HZD to have superior quality graphics. I feel like I'm watching a movie at times and whenever I play a game like this feel like wow this looks amazing! Bethesda games just like Starfield are the total opposite for me. The vast amount of customisation and details for your character, the insane amount of dialogue options as well as all the in game systems with a Bethesda game has means that I don't expect the graphics even on next gen to be on the same level as HZD. Say what you want about Bethesda but it's hard to deny they create fantastic and expansive game world's full of objects you can interact with, terrain you can travel and NPCs to talk to! I would argue that in that aspect they have the biggest open world game environments out of anyone else in the gaming industry. This along with the RPG elements all the other systems like crafting that go into their game I don't see how I could expect the graphics even next gen in 2023 to be comparable to HZD. As much as I love the HZD franchise and as massive as it is content wise it's still small compared to most Bethesda games.
You are tripping. They already leak 15hrs and have no bugs. Everybody is ready for Starfield. I can't wait. You don't have to play it.
Of course fighting in a spacesuit is going to be "stiff" with less possible maneuverability compared to normal clothing and atmosphere...just sayin.
BUT I am with you on rather having a smaller amount of highly polished planets vs "1000+" and not really having that much confidence in Bethesda as a whole. FO4 and everything since was trash.
This is a unreal engine 5 no man sky meets fallout. You are speaking facts 💯
I bet your ass those "windows central" and "xboxera" accounts will be inflating the game to 132 on metacritic
No Man's Sky 2
It's an RPG it's so much better than no man's sky.
NMS looks cheesy as shit