Planet Jupiter through 5 Telescopes.
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 вер 2024
- Telescope one is a travel scope 60, this was followed by an 8 inch newtonian, then a 102mm refractor, then a 90mm Mak. Then the C8 SCT. Why this order? It's in order of increasing focal length, which determines the size of the image on the detector. Note: these images are captured using “lucky imaging” the camera takes several hundred frames and “stacks” the images to take the best parts of each frame, and tosses out the poor frames.
Amazing. Ive always been drawn to Jupiter for whatever reason
Probably its strong gravity😉
@@cway-cway2256good one
Cuz it’s big af
Same lol
@cway-cway2256 lol
I just saw the moon through my telescope for the first time and it was insane cant wait to see jupiter
Same buddy it's been 5 months how did that go?
@@Ahmad_1799 Currently in the process of rebuilding it but ending up seeing jupiter and it was stunning
@@bix2001 really how much zoom did you see it with
@@Ahmad_1799 300x I think or I complety fucked my math up
@@bix2001 I'll be using a 150 x zoom I was able to get a view of the major moon all 4 with 50 x but since I'm new I couldn't find it with the Max zoom still saw the stripes and for the past days viewing conditions have been bad hoping I can see it today
I just saw it through my telescope for the first time today! That was truly an incredible moment 😂
it always amazes me to look through a telescope at a star and just see a beautiful planet there
I'm Antonio from Italy, fantastic challenge, before the Moon and now Jupiter...
Thanks!
Hello John. Jupiter is looking Spectacular ❤
Are you blind?
I bought an 8SE a few years ago after having a 4" reflector to start then I move up to a 5" Meade refractor on a motorized EQ mount. Now the 8SE.
Hi sir how ur travel scope 60 have so Clear image. I have pullox 76700 model it show clear but small not as big as urs. Do u have any advice. Can u suggest some upgrades. Can u tell a bit cheap
As I believe it says in the video, I used a ~$300 planetary imaging camera. To improve your view of planets, step 1 is to increase the aperture of the telescope. Typically, for good images of planets (both with cameras and to the eye) 200mm of aperture is a good start. A 200mm Newtonian telescope can be found for around $400 (new or used) if you look hard enough. This may not sound cheap to you, but as hobby’s go, that’s reasonable. Most people use SCT telescopes for planets, which are much more expensive.
@@LearnToStargazeSir is svbony 105 is ok. but sadly I can buy only sv bony 105. I have to give you respect for not even blinking once. Now it gives better picture from 175x. I have even capture band from 1.5x errecting barlow and using 4mm eyepiece. Ur 3rd one looks like same from eyepiece of 12.5mm clarity is almost same. If possible plz I beg plz make a video using telescope of
FL-700mm
A-76mm
I beg you
Hey Sir. I have a really blurry image after using AS4 &AS3. When I use Registax 6. It becomes very much unreal. IDk why. Can u help@@LearnToStargaze
Hey, nice video, i have a question:
Can I see planets and a Lil bit of deep sky with a 700/76az ?
Yes, that’s a pretty small aperture, so deep sky will be challenging without very dark, moonless skies.
Thanks a lot mate!
Hello so when i look at jupiter with my telescope its always so bright and i never get to see it cloud bands do you know what could help me?
Could be a focus issue, or a collimation issue. If it’s simply too bright you can take use the lens cap and block half the aperture of the telescope to drop the brightness.
hello, whenever I saw photos from a telescope, they were white like stars, just without details, is it the camera's fault?
What telescope? What camera? There are many combinations.
Where is the giant red spot
On the other side. This video was filmed in only about an hour, not enough time for the spot to rotate into view.
Really the first one was the best for me 🙂 nice !no mean number 5 what kind of camera are you using? Thanks
Camera is the ASI224MC
@@LearnToStargaze what kind kind of filters you used on Jupiter. I want to start doing photography
question: how come i’m not able to see details on jupiter? i have the Celestron - AstroMaster 130EQ 650mm German Equatorial Reflector Telescope
You should be able to see the four Moons and two cloud belts. A blue filter may help with additional details. Have you collimated both mirrors on that telescope?
Probably multiple pictures stacked together pr enhanced in post processing
These are not ‘live view’ images.
If I have a 144mm telescope and a the 26mm eyepiece that came with it can I find Jupiter?
Of course! It’s the bright star in the south west after sunset these days. (Along with Venus).
Hey i just started stargazing and i have a 500mm focal length telescope with a 10mm eyepiece and a 2x barlow but when i look at jupiter its too bright can you tell me whats the issue?
(btw can you tell me whats the best program to stack planet photos, and what camera should i use to picture planets and stuff less than a 100$? )
Thank you!
PIPP and Registax for planets, blue filter for Jupiter. Good luck! ASI224MC for the camera (nothing less).
How did you manage to get that result with travel scope 60/360? I have travel 80/400 and its not even close (I tried 10mm, 4mm, barlow 2x), I only see light bulb or blurry image. Do I need to replace my 45 prism to 90 dielectric mirror?
This was done using a designated planetary imaging camera, using a technique called “lucky imaging”. The camera also could tone down Jupiter’s brightness, (a blue filter could do the same for your eye). That said, neither the 60/360, nore the 80/400 telescopes are intended to be used for space. These are spotting telescopes and will experience significant aberrations when pointed at bright objects on dark backgrounds.
Cool bruh!
The travel scope 60, using those lens you mentioned are the defaults from the telescope or you buy them ??
I just bought one but I am not very familiar with terminology hehe thanks
Depends what you are trying to look at. That telescope is really not designed for looking at things in space, and I don’t know how far way the birds/boats etc are you that might be using it for.
@@LearnToStargaze on your video the no.5 you said you could see Jupiter, so I am curious about it.. I was only expecting to see the moon, but your video gave me hope hehe
it can see Jupiter, just like binoculars can see Jupiter. The camera I used has very small pixels, so I was able to get some detail.
hi john i have a question is 150/750 dobsian telescope good or nah?
What brand ?
I have a 76/700 telescope so should I expect better views of Jupiter compared to the travel scope(Barlow lens too so 1400mm mag)
The biggest determinant of your view is the atmospheric conditions. Followed by the aperture of the telescope, followed by the quality of the eyepiece.
@@LearnToStargazeI have on emlre question, I'm looking to getting 5x Barlow for telescope, what eyepiece would you recommend for clearest views
@@_-pingas- I’m not how sure anything would look good with a 5x Barlow.
Hey I have a telescope that is f/5 wondering how I can see space objects more clear. Mine is Celestron NexStar 130SLT
The best advice is to just use the lower powered, highest focal length eyepiece. An eyepiece upgrade, like to an SV190, would also improve the experience. The biggest factor will be the darkness of your skies.
@@LearnToStargaze Thank you for some advice
Hey I have a question regarding my Celestron lt 114 telescope. Once I align my telescope during the day, what do I do from there. Because every time I go outside in the dark, it always says "finding telescope position", and it never works.
Thanks.
Did you watch my full video on the StarSense 114? If you tell me the time stamp where you are confused, that would help me address the issue.
Amazing. Btw which eyepiece with barlow did you use(or no barlow) at the Celestron C90 Mak? and one more question does the planet actually look that big on the eyepiece not qualitaty just size
No Barlows. The planet looks big primarily because the sensor in the camera is very small.
I Don't Really Have Good Telescope But I Made My Own 62mm Refracted Telescope In that I Can See Jupiter With Some of its Details and Its Moons
Cool!
@@LearnToStargaze Thanks 😇
@@editplayeroghow u made it?
@@asiyaalii Using Pvc pipe, Pullox 62mm Lens 700mm Focal length Objective lens , Focuser , Diagonal
Man that C90mak looks really good
I like it! Amazing it used to be only $129 back in 2020.
There is no UA-cam slow motion on iPad shorts, pause is a pain too. I’d buy a f/9-f/12 100mm ED tomorrow, transportation to the shops drives design too much.
Have you tried removing the diagonal? Better pics. So I have heard. I am new at this. Awesome pictures.
The camera will not achieve focus without the extra focal distance provided by the diagonal.
These are nice stacked images! Are these taken on the same night or the best you've captured with each of the scopes?
All the same night, not the best, just about 10 seconds each if I recall.
How could it be that the C90Mak is 1250mm and the Celestron 130SLT is only 650MM?
The Mak has two internal mirrors, passing the light back and forth within the optical tube effectively folding the light path. The 130SLT is a Newtonian, the focal length is basically the length of the optical tube.
@@LearnToStargazeand what is the best is that I am among those 2
Hey, I wanted to know that how will jupiter look through celestrom powerseeker 114eq ?
It will look like a bright white ball with 4 tiny dots (moons) around it. You may be able to see two cloud lines on Jupiter’s surface.
@@LearnToStargaze thanks
@@LearnToStargaze this is how I see it, how much will it change with a moon filter? I really want to see it orange bro I have the telescope 3 months now and watch the white ball with rly rly gard to see lines, I rly want to see more ;(
When looking at a planet do you have to keep adjusting it to keep the planet / object in view? I bought an 8” for my kids for Christmas and it’s pretty difficult to see or track something
Just keep the magnification low and you should only have to adjust it once per minute.
Very cool view
It would have been better if you had mentioned the aperture of the objective lens of these telescopes too.
Next time…
Skywatcher skyliner 200p or bresser 203/1200 exos 2?
This is a very strange comparison, it’s sort of like saying: “Honda civic or F-150”. So let me know, Honda or Ford, and this will help me with your telescope question.
They both have a ratio of 6 and both have the same aperture they both collect 860 light gathering capacity the bresser one is made of strong aluminium but idk what the tube on skyliner is
I have a question that is a bit offtopic. So in 2017, I took my dad and my two daughters, and drove 2 hours south to be in totality for the solar eclipse. It was breathtaking and stunning. However, this is where my question comes in: why do pictures look nothing like what I saw? I know cameras and eyes are different, but I mean, the pictures just do not do it justice in the slightest. Is there a way to image an eclipse to show what the eyes see?
Sure, it’s just a very specific camera exposure, but it still won’t look very good. Try taking a photo of the full Moon next time you see it. It may look huge to your eye, but will only cover a few pixels in your camera, even if your camera settings approximate your eyes.
@@LearnToStargaze yeah, I was fiddling with shutter speed and ISO for the May lunar eclipse. Thanks for the response.
The song is by my favorite band!
Great band!
@@LearnToStargaze yeah and I saw them in concert on August 13
Hello, I have a Celestron 70mm travel scope with a 10mm eyepiece and x2 Barlow. With this setup and Jupiter at opposition, Jupiter looked like a tiny small orangeish dot. No way could I get any definition. Idk how you did this with a 60mm Celestron?
The pixels on the camera are extremely small. The sensor and pixels are so small in fact, that planets are the only thing these cameras can reasonably image.
beautiful! had to sub
Man I love you so much bcs of your video now I know how much detail I can see with a telescope! I am gonna buy a f/11 is it gonna be a good telescope? Again Ty so much for this video! I can’t keep my excitement xD
Not really sure what you mean by f/11, that’s simply a ratio and tells you nothing about the telescope. The most important quality is aperture (at least 4 inches is required for general observing beyond the moon and planets) and a quality mount (ideally a Dobsonian for beginners).
@@LearnToStargazeOh sry, I am gonna purchase an omegon it has 150mm aperture and a 750mm focal length.
I love the 3rd one❤
This is very cool
Can I see detail through a 102 az from celestron
Of course this video used a camera so the view is different with the human eye, but using a blue filter gets you pretty close.
Amazing
Any advice to someone who’s brand new and wants to start in Astrophotography what’s a good telescope I can buy that is able to track. Also what other stuff would I need in order to take good pictures and put them on a computer thanks I have around $600-$1000 to spend
Hi! The mount is more important than the telescope. You might need to triple your budget before you get an image you’re truly proud of. If I were to start over, this is how I’d enter the astrophotography hobby. ua-cam.com/video/DtivH8Tn4Pg/v-deo.html
@@LearnToStargaze thank you for commenting and answering my question
I am considering buying the saxon 767AZ reflector telescope as my first one (i have wanted one since i was a little girl). But i cant find any information about what the planets would look like with the specs of the saxon 😢
Where are you located? That is a sub par design, I’d be worried you’d be disappointed. Are there any 102mm refractors where you live?
@@LearnToStargaze I live in NZ ☺️
I would need to have a look, I think the saxon is 170x zoom. I'm not sure yet lol.
@@ellewright6991 "zoom" is not an important quality of a telescope. It's a function of the focal length, and what eyepiece you are using. Resolution, aperture, and mirror design are what is important for a newtonian.
@@LearnToStargaze thank you,
I'm definitely still learning and have found your channel to be amazing.
I went with a 114mm and I'm not disappointed ❤️
I'm on a farm, theres no light pollution so when it's clear it's absolutely beautiful!
I am still working on focusing my eyes properly when looking through the eye piece (25mm) and I managed to line up and view my first star using your methods! Now my husband is interested lol.
I will keep watching and learning ❤️
My next mission is to learn where everything is in the sky ☺️
Hi, what camera you used?
The ASI224MC
how does jupiter look through 186x magnification
At what aperture/resolution? Magnification is largely irrelevant to image quality in telescopes.
I am using a Celestron 114AZ SR telescope
@@jaylaine17 I’m that scope (when properly set up, collimated,and focused) it will look like a bright disk with 4 dots. That’s almost too much magnification for Jupiter though, it’s rare to use that much power for anything. That telescope has other challenges, primarily the bird jones trick they’re using to get that magnification. Here is a proper review of the telescope by telescope watch: telescopicwatch.com/celestron-explorascope-114az-reflector-telescope-review/
by the way, what is the maximum useful magnification for the telescope
@@jaylaine17 on paper it’s 228x (twice the aperture), but the poor quality of the optics in the 114 will show well below that.
u r awesome! hope someday i would also get a telescope!
Did you erase the moon's or were they just out of view?
The camera is not a human eye, with Jupiter it’s really hard to see them both at the same time, the camera simply does not have enough dynamic range. With this camera, you have to increase the exposure quite a bit to see them, at which point Jupiter is washed out.
@@LearnToStargaze just being curious. I don't have a telescope like you. I used to always draw Jupiter's moons on paper and was always amazed on how fast they move. I can draw one picture of what I see and look through the telescope again in about an hour or two and it'll be a whole different picture. I show up to parties with my telescope and make everyone look through it.
Awesome what you can achieve from those scopes and your videos in generall are verry well explained and helpfu! I have a sw skymax 102 with a single 12.5mm eyepiece I have great views of the moon, but cannot find any planets, sometimes i spend hours of finding them, trough the scope but i see only some small and dimm stars, what do you think is the problem? What should i use to see/ image juoiter for ex?thank you
Sounds like you are searching with far too much magnification. Do you have a 30mm or higher eyepiece?
@@LearnToStargaze unfortunatelly this is my only eyepiece at the moment, and was thinking getting a 25 plossl for now with long eye relief :-??
@@arpadjakab-peter5431 Yes, that is a good all-purpose eyepiece. Also, finding at least Jupiter right now should be pretty easy, your finderscope and telescope must be out of alignment.
@@LearnToStargaze yes, their were out of alighment a lot, thank you! And also can I use the 25mm or even the 12.5mm eyepiece to take photos with a DSLR?
@@arpadjakab-peter5431 no, you would attach the DSRL to the telescope directly with a t-adapter. You’ll want a nice motorized mount though. Other wise the telescope will be very unwieldy.
JOHN!!! For a starsense dx 5 what eyepieces do u recommend to get views like this!!!???
Hi Stephen! There is a 32mm Plossl by Televue that would pair great with this scope for deep sky objects. I like the 10mm Hyperion for planets. Clear skies!
@LearnToStargaze Thank you John. Sp far all I have ordered is the telescope itself (for xmas for my son). My main objective is to see planets as close up (and clear) as possible. I know the scope comes with a 10 mm however I've seen many posts that mention changing these. Besides the 2 eyepieces you mentioned, do u recommend anything else to get the best views?
@@stephenmorales6940 nope, you should be good for years with these.
@LearnToStargaze thanks so much John! I've been using your videos to prepare for stargazing experiences to come and appreciate much of the content that you share. I do notice that with your dx5 you use 2 inch EPs and diagonal. Is this some of the basics that I should include in addition to the recommended EPs? Last question I promise!
@@stephenmorales6940 nah. I don’t think the 2 inch makes much of a difference with the DX5. Unless you allready have a 2 inch eyepiece you really like, no need to use a 2 inch diagonal.
I see that, but brighter, white, what filter should I get to get your view?
Blue seems to work best for Jupiter. You can also stop down the aperture with the lid of the telescope.
@@LearnToStargaze There are a lot of people that told me to get the blue filter, but I dont want to see him blue, I want to see him with his color, not like the proccessed images but like better color yk, I am happy with the bright jupiter, like I see the 2 lines and the moons its really nice but it looks like a star rather than a planet... I bought a polarizing filter, but idk if thats the right choice, I want a filter that doesnt change the color, maybe a moon filkter would be better to buy? idk...
@@LearnToStargaze ua-cam.com/video/rda9ma4kGmo/v-deo.html&feature=share, this video is someone using blue filter on jupiter, he shows jupiter without filter and then he shows with the filter, but for me the no filter is my goal, like I only try to reduce brightness
@@Markaras I think you need to try it for yourself. A camera is not a good way to test something designed for the human eye.
@@LearnToStargaze people told me that without a camera, so you and the telescope, when looking with your eye through the eyepiece you cant see colors, is that true? like the live views that I see from internet with brown color are that because of the use of a camera
Please make shorts for all planets
On it!
Magnificent ❤
Love this!!
Do you put any filters on your eyepiece to see the gas rings like that?
Not for Saturn, but a Blue filter can help you see Jupiter more clearly.
Like! One question, did you use a filter on Jupiter for this video ?
Nope! Just the camera, and an ASIair to stack the video.
@@LearnToStargazethank you for your reply. I was asking because I have the ES First Light 102/1000 mm, for 2 weeks now, I looked at Jupiter 3-4 nights in a row and it has a huge blue halo around. It’s not like in your video Jupiter and all dark around, it has a huge blue halo and I don’t know why since on Saturn it doesn’t. Saturn looks great without any halo around it or chromatic aberrations. Could it be because of the cheap Plossl 10 mm eyepiece it came with ? Saturn looks fantastic through it, but I was really disappointed with Jupiter because of the huge blue halo around the planet.
@@3dfxvoodoocards6 congrats on the firstlight 102/1000! I love that scope, I was using it yesterday on the same targets. I’m guessing it’s either the eyepiece or dew on the lens. The reason it’s happening on Jupiter and not Saturn is because Jupiter is currently much much brighter. It’s definitely worth upgrading the eyepiece. I was using the Baader Hyperion 10mm.
@@LearnToStargaze Thank you a lot for your answer. I already ordered some eyepieces from SvBony with 66 degrees field of view, I hope that ugly blue halo disappears :)
I have a problem :(
Every time i changed eyepiece or barlow i lose sight of the planet im looking at
(telescope i use: bresser skylux 60 700)
I think that has a pan handle mount. Twist the handle clockwise to lock the telescope in position.
@@LearnToStargaze i always block the telescope from moving but it keeps shaking
Is there a problem with the telescope itself?
@@baconbirbthegreat That telescope is really, really, tiny. A bit of shakiness is to be expected. If you got it from Bresser, do you think you might be able to trade it for something more solid like this? : www.bresser.de/Astronomie/Teleskope/BRESSER-Messier-5-Dobson.html
@@LearnToStargaze hmm ill think about it but for now i wanna get used to using a telescope in the way its supposed to in the first place
I think that a disclaimer that stacking is involved is needed. Giving the impression to new prospective people that would want to buy a telescope that even a small scope would actually let them see Jupiter that big and in that detail is, imho, dishonest, and would make those people feel cheated and angry at astronomy.
I’ve seen Jupiter that clear in these scopes. It just depends on your transparency, seeing, and airmass. In fact, Jupiter looked that good in just the Omni 102 refractor a few nights ago. It’s also clear I’m using advanced equipment, you can see the ASIair in the footage.
@@LearnToStargaze Yes, I know it is expensive and I see the camera (hence the stacking), but a beginner might think this is actually what you would see from an eyepiece. If a 60mm scope with a 2x barlow can really produce this result, I'd really like to know which eyepiece did that miracle.
All I am saying is that we have to take into account what people watch this, lest we create false expectations to the people that want to join in the Stargazing fun.
The viewers are smart enough to know the difference. People have seen enough nebulae photos to know that cameras and the human eye work differently. But I will add a stacking disclaimer.
@@LearnToStargaze > But I will add a stacking disclaimer.
Thank you :)
@@sejuanisupportonly7385 bro is probably mad because he bought the travel scope 60 expecting this right out of the package💀
Is the color same ??? Btw third one is good
Contrast is a bit different in the refractors. I think the only processing was stack and sharpen which was done in the ASIair app. Maybe some denoise, I don’t recall.
Can you do mars through different telescopes
Soon!
I think that's what I said
Wher are the rings
Jupiter does not have rings that are visible from a backyard telescope. Saturn has rings.
Hey John, how does the ASIAIR Plus work?
It connects to your telescope, camera, and guide camera. It handles almost everything a computer would otherwise do for astrophotography.
Is the 3rd one just a PVC pipe with a some lens?
Probably. It’s that what all telescopes are? Just a pipe and a lens?
Can you see jupiter with a 40 mm eye piece?
Yes, but that’s not what a 40mm eyepiece is designed for. I’ve found the best eyepiece for Jupiter in a small telescope is a 5mm X-Cel.
@@LearnToStargaze oh that's really nice but does celestron sell an Really good eye piece?
@@raiden2.o220 the 5mm X-Cel is made by Celestron. It’s good.
@@LearnToStargaze okay thanks for the information 😊👍
Back in 02, someone was able to show me Jupiter's moons threw an even better telescope then any of those.
Hello quick question is celestron nexstar 4 or 5 good
Good scopes, just expensive for the given aperture.
Ok thanks
Nice c8 btw
Thanks mate you are the best person with telescopes yet :)
5 & 2 look the best
I ❤
hey John, can you zoom through a planetary camera?
Just lower the resolution on the computer and the planet will appear larger on the screen. With telescopes, you never actually zoom since the aperture always stays the same size. A barlow will also make the planet appear bigger, which may (or may not) improve the quality of the picture. You’d need to experiment.
@@LearnToStargaze My dad thought you can zoom saying "You can zoom through a telescope. There is a knob that will help make the planet bigger.
@@jaylaine17 There is no such knob. The only knob on a telescope is for focus. Magnification is determined by focal length of the telescope and the eyepiece. Regardless of magnification, resolution is fixed based on the size of primary lens or mirror.
Can i see Jupiter on 45x?
Yes. At 45x Jupiter will appear as a small bright white circle surrounded by 4 dots (the Galilean moons).
@@LearnToStargaze Ok, Thanks.
I have 2400mm
I love Jupiter planet after earth
why did 60/360 got better image than my 60/700
What camera did you use?
@@LearnToStargaze smartphone, oppo a1k
@@sderbz I used an ASI224mc. A camera designed for planets.
I realised I’m getting a 10 inch Newton with a focal length of 1200 this is gonna be hard
Hu? What’s hard about that? Finding Jupiter is pretty darn easy in any (non-toy) telescope.
Yeah a ten inch is two over my size people say the 8 inchers are the best
After long exposure
I think I used something like 0.05 seconds, stacking about 10 total seconds each telescope, trying my best to be consistent.
Me : bruh these telescopes will 100% be expensive 💀💀💀
I think the first one was $39 Canadian dollars. That said, it’s pretty worthless without the $1000 mount.
that did not exactly look like a travel scope 60
That was exactly a travel scope 60. They were all on the same mount for filming purposes. Kept the mount pointed at the target, and just swapped the telescopes.
me 2
Nice to see tony stark using a telescope 😂
I haven’t heard that one before!
U actually look more like tony stark
The travel 60 telescope for beginners
As long as you don’t plan on looking at things in space (unless the Moon is very low), the travel 60 is okay for looking at bird feeders etc.
@@LearnToStargazeSo you could see Jupiter and Saturn well and deep sky?!
@@ujytututotoo9883 not well, but it’s technically possible. Better for watching birds in a feeder.
by the way, you should do about planet mars through mutiple telescopes
My reflector telephone is about 700mm but your 360mm is better than my 😅🤣
I mean, yeah, all other things equal, the views will look better at lower focal lengths.
Im preparing to buy 1400 mm telescope for 300€
Is that good?
Idk how but I’m lucky I’m 9 years old but I’m getting a 8 inch Newton on a eq5 mount 😂 I’m prepared for it I know how to you a eq telescope >:)
A good skill to have!
Thx for liking I need some more questions about the skywatcher explorer 200p tho it’s gonna be my first eq mounted telescope
@@LearnToStargaze I know what to do for a 9.8 year old boy I’ve watched your eq mount video and it was great was that an eq2?
@@LearnToStargaze I’m also a great telescope drawer
@@LearnToStargaze and my fav is the newton
Can i get a shoutout i have been a old fan but this is A new account for my yt channel 🙏🔭
Don't use your diagonal... 😇
You have to in some cases to reach focus. I don’t have a 1.25 inch extender.
@@LearnToStargaze yeah, offcourse, focus can be an issue in some cases. But the 102 doublet, the mak and the c8 definitely don't need a diagonal.
@@DirkDirk1983 It was an issue in those cases.
@@LearnToStargaze maybe an issue, but no need to place a diagonal. It just isn't... But if you stick with that, hey, who am I 😇
Jesus Christ YT is not meritocratico AT ALL.
I have no idea what that means.
@@LearnToStargaze Learn italian as we italians have to learn your lenguage to open another door to the world.
@@MrMa1981I’ve spent half my life leaning French (I’m Canadian) and still don’t speak it well though. I do love Italy, my favorite place was Naples.
Can you please do Jupiter through the celestron astromaster lt 70az
I traded the astromaster 70az for a guitar haha. I think we included video of Jupiter through this telescope in our 70AZ video though.
@@LearnToStargaze haha 😆 is it a decent telescope or ? Because I'm a beginner and I ordered itv
@@aa_n2010 the 70mm is a tiny aperture telescope good for Jupiter, Venus and the Moon. Aperture determines resolution and general light collecting ability. Generally, 100mm is the minimum requirement for a beginner telescope, with 200mm (8inches) being required to see most all beginner targets (like the Messier list).
@@LearnToStargaze ohh I'm on a budget of 100-150 do u have any recommendations?
@@LearnToStargaze me and my mates like to go out and look at stars and planets and other stuff but we only have binoculars and we would really like to see stars and planets and other things like nebulas up close enough but do you think 150 euro would do that?
Hey, I'm embarrassed to ask but I'm 100% new to this. Could someone recommend a great telescope to me? I'm a beginner and I'd love something to grow with that's also portable. Every single year I go hunting in northern Michigan where there's absolutely zero light pollution. More than anything in the world, I'd love to see the rings on Saturn and the M31 galaxy, if possible. Do I have to spend thousands to make this happen? I've read so many articles online, but all of them feel biased with mixed reviews. I have no idea who to trust and admittedly, I have zero friends into this hobby. Thank you in advance to anyone who responds. I genuinely appreciate you.
A great telescope depends on your budget, and what you intend to use it for. The best tool to see M31 is a pair of binocular and dark skies. Saturn you can see from the city, and it best seen with a high focal length. For the most part, I lost telescopes capable of seeing the Messier list of deep sky objects. The ideal telescope for this is an 8 inch Dobsonian. If you’re on a budget, the Starsense 102DX is a really fun scope, and if your budget is higher, the NexStar Evolution 8. Hope this helps!
Nice clip loved the travel scope. .could i know which camera did you use
ASI224MC
@@LearnToStargaze Make a video on.
Hey astronomers from learn to stargaze and this saturn through 5 telescopes
@@veeretsy7528 It's on my list! The Challenge is that Saturn is behind my neighbor's house and I'd need to move all the telescopes to the park.
@@LearnToStargaze Great.Good luck with the image