Uber should also ban drivers from posting footage on video platforms or social media unless they have the rider's consent. The cameras should only be there for the protection of the riders and drivers.
@safeandeffectivelol someone doesn't know the lawwwwwwww uber can't limit you as it doesn't matter what uber says this is one a public area so consent isn't needed
@@Nozokiyea you’re right. He was an off duty cop. I saw the full video on another channel. Makes me laugh because it’s like “tell me you’re a cop, without telling me you’re a cop” lol
True but I uber does not care and they take the passengers word/lies vs the driver even if they have proof. Drivers are getting deactivated everyday because the passenger just wants their money back or a free ride. I know this because I'm a Uber/Lyft driver and I'm always talking with my fellow Uber/Lyft driver daily.
@@aled24flgood. take everything seriously because we do NOT need another kidnapping and murder due to Uber’s hiring negligence. get a real job and you’ll be fine.
It's much more sad than that if you actually think about it. Why do they feel offended for insignificant/nonexistent reasons? Simple. They have nothing else going on in their life. They are unable to lead any life that would be fulfilling enough not to lead them down a path where they would feel the need to spark "problems" due to their own incompetence at life. Most sane and rational people would recognise this, and take necessary steps to lead a life that they would be a bit more happy/proud about. For example, finding hobbies, getting a job, working towards a promotion, saving money to buy a house, etc... It takes a very specific kind of person to be offended by a camera in a situation like this.
I don't know why you would even expect an Uber driver not to have a camera. I feel like that is pretty much essential to being an Uber driver and not getting completely screwed.
Some people just don't like being recorded. Like, you people understand this is the same exact argument that was made to justify government surveillance right? "If you don't like it, that must mean you're doing something illegal." No, it's just uncomfortable and an invasion of privacy.
@AdDelayed ok. Off the job cop pulls agun on you and tells you if you don't follow directions, he's gonna shoot you. Tf you gonna do then? With a camera in plain sight, you basically guarantee not only your safety, but also your innocence if it does go to court. Obviously you've lived in your parents' house all your life and have never been homeless or living in a car. This shit is the reason I didn't get robbed, bro.
@@AdDelayed It's not dumb; he's right. It doesn't matter what the person in the car is or who they are. You're in an Uber, they even have cameras in regular old Taxi's. It's nothing new. Know who doesn't like cameras? People up to no good. They're in public, there is no expectation of privacy. It's very definition even states that!
No, he wasn’t. He was just some drunk guy claiming to be in hopes that he’d scare the driver into shutting off the camera. It’s funny how people like you will try to find any way to hate police yet can’t even do the most basic amount of research.
Getting into the car and continuing the ride is giving your consent. If you choose to remain in the vehicle and not cancel your ride after you see that sign then you have consented.
You may need permission from the property on which you are filming. Private property always. You cannot film if filming looks into a private residence additionally. Everywhere belongs to someone and simply because they do not enforce it doesn’t mean they cannot at any time. Especially true if it is seen as disruptive or interfering with traffic for example. This is the reason why technically any COMMERCIAL (this is where it gets abused by people with monetized content- who do not) filming usually requires a permit to film for tv and film if say on city state or county property. Here is a typical example from the a USA city website… You must follow City requirements to do commercial film or video work in the following locations in (city): Streets, sidewalks or alleys Park property City Hall But again even privately if you are a nuisance harassing or disruptive you can be asked to cease.
@@katrina1668 you are probably referring to commercial use. This is not for that purpose unless he is using it say in a monetized fashion. Additionally audio recording vary by state and they generally use the language of needing both parties consent to RECORD. Audio… and the consent is dependent on being aware or unaware… they are aware so they are consenting by continuing to participate… hence the point of the brillant creator in the video “goodbye”.
Easy solution. Get enough people to vote against recording in public and they'll make a law against it 🙄 lol. Just film some quiet protesting from your home and raise enough social awareness that they'll begin posting laws against recording anyone in public.
i prefer rideshare apps that have these cameras cos i feel like the driver is concerned for their own safety, thus they are not a threat to mine, plus i can prove my innocence, need be, i can also be sure if i left something behind!
No. The cameras are for his protection not yours. If you get any benefit that is just an accidental bonus. I am always amused when I watch a police cam show where they put someone in handcuffs "for the safety of both of us." Really? If handcuffs make us both safer why is the citizen always the one getting restrained?
@@aebalcperhaps he has his own safety mostly in mind, you can't fault him for that. But it DOES protect both parties. It's an objective record of the situation. Your handcuff analogy doesn't fit with this situation at all. A camera doesn't restrain people. It's a deterrent. But even then, handcuffs render a person less able to cause harm, so the cops don't have to be so on guard. A cop that's too highly strung can be prone to using excessive force. So if they make the detainee harmless, they don't themselves have any reason to harm
This guy was very beautiful in his actions. He made clear warnings, of which one should even be in the app, and when the passenger made it clear he did not have consent, he pulled over and ended the ride. Very good job.
@@rypsterhc8673 Correction; telling someone to leave does not magically mean that person is suddenly trespassing. It only becomes trespassing once that person has willingly refused to do so.
I love this channel. The way the lawyer is so energetic and explains everything - just makes me want to keep watching more and more. Love learning tidbits of legal rules!
@@B345T1N355Official the notice on the door in this case could work as implied consent, and when he removed his consent he was asked to leave the vehicle.
Hey, props to both people here. The riders, while not in the legal right, didn’t want to be filmed and brought it up calmly. Then didn’t throw a fit or anything extreme and listened when asked to get out. This is how you handle conflict as an adult. Talk it out without anger, then walk away if you can’t agree
This is especially legal if they are on a free record state where only the recorder need to consent in a public area, granted this is a lot more state by state so checks your local law but if your in a state that allows it dont let any karen or ken stop you
By agreeing to the terms and conditions of the Uber App, and entering the Uber Vehicle with visible signage warning you of recording. You are agreeing, and consenting, to being recorded.
on top of that, most states are one-party consent for recording. last time I checked there was only one or two that were two-party consent and some are zero party consent which allow third parties to record without the knowledge of either side.
Only people with bad intentions are the ones to conplain about recording. Why do i care if im being recorded, all they will get is hours of me staring at my phone
Regardless if it was "public" (which its not, its still a private vehicle even when used for commercial use, it's not PUBLIC transit, and Uber is a private company) 38 out of 50 states are single party consent states, meaning in almost 80% of states he doesn't even have to inform them, and in the offhand chance he's in a dual consent he gave notice so regardless he'd be fine.
You really don't have to inform them I'm any US state, as long as your on public property or your property etc. The consent laws are only really brought up in court
Also, many states are one-party consent states. Wherein only one person involved in the interaction needs to consent to the recording of that interaction, and that person is usually the one doing the recording.
18 years in law enforcement, people invent their own laws (that sound reasonable in their own mind), and they simultaneously believe the law they just made up…. Happens all the time… and then there are the “laws” they “learn” from movies…. The fact that they believe themselves so fervently is always astounding….
You can record anyone anywhere they accessible to the public. I could walk by someone’s house and if you leave a window open anything I can see from the public sidewalk is legal to record.
Even the uber app tells you if the driver has dashcam.
Uber should also ban drivers from posting footage on video platforms or social media unless they have the rider's consent. The cameras should only be there for the protection of the riders and drivers.
Shut up @@safeandeffectivelol
@safeandeffectivelol someone doesn't know the lawwwwwwww uber can't limit you as it doesn't matter what uber says this is one a public area so consent isn't needed
@@safeandeffectivelol one of the most delusional statements I’ve ever seen.
That's a good point thank goodness masks work if you don't want your face to show
People think they know the law is getting really annoying. Especially with public property.
The dude was an off duty cop if I recall correctly. He should know the law, but surprise, he's just another cop ignorant of the law.
@@Nozoki They don't teach law in police academy in USA.
@@XtreeM_FaiL Not always.
@@Voodooray007 They not always not teach...? M'kay
@@Nozokiyea you’re right. He was an off duty cop. I saw the full video on another channel. Makes me laugh because it’s like “tell me you’re a cop, without telling me you’re a cop” lol
That Uber driver was EXTREMELY professional. Major props!
Nah he's a jerk for posting it online.
@@bencilsharpie7567jerk for what? calling out an idiot’s behavior?
Torward, the end was a bit shaky, though
Snowflake @@bencilsharpie7567
@@bencilsharpie7567not really
They had it comin
Considering a lot of the drivers have been assaulted by passengers they are required to have proof of the assault.
True but I uber does not care and they take the passengers word/lies vs the driver even if they have proof. Drivers are getting deactivated everyday because the passenger just wants their money back or a free ride. I know this because I'm a Uber/Lyft driver and I'm always talking with my fellow Uber/Lyft driver daily.
No its for insurance purposes more
Considering many riders have been raped by uber drivers in various countries ....
not required to upload every interaction to social media tho you are missing the point use the rest of your brain too.
@@aled24flgood. take everything seriously because we do NOT need another kidnapping and murder due to Uber’s hiring negligence. get a real job and you’ll be fine.
There is zero reasonable expectation of privacy in someone else's car
Exactly!
FACTS, regardless of it being public or private property
How about posting the cam video to social media without their consent? i'm pretty sure this is not okay, and borderline in Defamation territory
@@jensenraylight8011 It's perfectly legal
@@jensenraylight8011Sorry to break it to you. Still legal
People being offended just to get offended is so crazy lol
Well it’s a cop, so…
For real. People get bored and just want to start trouble because.
It's much more sad than that if you actually think about it. Why do they feel offended for insignificant/nonexistent reasons? Simple. They have nothing else going on in their life.
They are unable to lead any life that would be fulfilling enough not to lead them down a path where they would feel the need to spark "problems" due to their own incompetence at life.
Most sane and rational people would recognise this, and take necessary steps to lead a life that they would be a bit more happy/proud about. For example, finding hobbies, getting a job, working towards a promotion, saving money to buy a house, etc...
It takes a very specific kind of person to be offended by a camera in a situation like this.
Your comment offended me, sooooooo I’m offended. 😘
True thank goodness masks can work if you don't like being recorded
"I dont want to be on camera"
Understandable, you can get out of my car 🚗
I think people like that are out to cause trouble I don't trust them.
@@okidokidrawswho? Can you be any less specific?
@@FreStyle3Din context of the video who do you think he's talking about?
@@jimjam2024FreStyle3D used taunt.
It wasn’t very effective…
@@FreStyle3Dtry watching the video and you just might understand. WOW.
Doesnt want to be on camera but decides to make a scene.
I don't know why you would even expect an Uber driver not to have a camera. I feel like that is pretty much essential to being an Uber driver and not getting completely screwed.
Gotta do what ya gotta do.
They wanted him to turn the camera off... as to why it's uncertain, but if they did something illegal there would be less evidence
Why do I feel like they either did or were planning to do something illegal and were afraid of getting caught?
Its a drunk off duty cop who doesn’t understand the law.
@@Quickcat21MKproof?
Some people just don't like being recorded.
Like, you people understand this is the same exact argument that was made to justify government surveillance right? "If you don't like it, that must mean you're doing something illegal."
No, it's just uncomfortable and an invasion of privacy.
@@MikeJAk49bro u had to make it political for no reason :/
@@MikeJAk49Of course you had to make it political
In other words; “turn the camera’s off so we can rob you.”
I doubt that old cop and his wife were going to rob the driver.
@safeandeffectivelol And that doubt makes you an easy target. You're the exact type of person who would get robbed this way.
@@TylireousGaming you have no idea how dumb this sounds given the situation
@AdDelayed ok. Off the job cop pulls agun on you and tells you if you don't follow directions, he's gonna shoot you. Tf you gonna do then? With a camera in plain sight, you basically guarantee not only your safety, but also your innocence if it does go to court.
Obviously you've lived in your parents' house all your life and have never been homeless or living in a car. This shit is the reason I didn't get robbed, bro.
@@AdDelayed It's not dumb; he's right. It doesn't matter what the person in the car is or who they are. You're in an Uber, they even have cameras in regular old Taxi's. It's nothing new.
Know who doesn't like cameras? People up to no good. They're in public, there is no expectation of privacy. It's very definition even states that!
Those cameras are for the driver's protection.
"u dont have my permission to film me"
"betch I can play that game too, get out of my care" 🤣🤣🤣🤣
*car.
Yup, driver said you're gonna learn today
Stay in school. Seriously.
@@warriormanmaxx8991 Driver so they are in his care, if you are going to be a grammer nazi at least come correct.
No, 100% sure he meant to type car and not care.
"you didnt get my consent"
"you consented when you signed up for the Uber App"
You consented when you singed up for this Uber ride as well 😅
A cop who gets shitfaced, acts like an asshole, and doesn’t understand the law? I would’ve never guessed.
You have a stroke, bud?
Huh?
@@JoJoGaminG36according to the internet, the dude who said how recording him was illegal is a cop.
that's all I know
Shocked, I tell you! 😲
He would do the same thing sober.
Even if it was illegal, I ain't taking my dash cam down 😂
Facts. Gotta protect yourself somehow, companies and cops won't.
Best part about it is it could not be illegal because you have a camera within your own car
And that guy is a cop too, he knew he was talking nonsense 😂
Cops are allergic to being filmed.
No, he wasn’t. He was just some drunk guy claiming to be in hopes that he’d scare the driver into shutting off the camera. It’s funny how people like you will try to find any way to hate police yet can’t even do the most basic amount of research.
These poor drivers out here just trying to work and protect themselves against mayhem and foolishness.
And violent assault.
@@user-us9wu1xk1zseen under "mayhem and foolishness"
Maybe if their cars didn't smell like curry I wouldn't get so angry all the time
@@MrPsyren99 Maybe call a different service.
@@MrPsyren99maybe try therapy.
Driver handled that like a pro. Listened to the complaint even though he didn't have to and came up with a solution.
100% has to listen to the passenger.
@@f12pushthekeyslisten and kick him out. 😂
That’s what the passenger gets for being a little whiny toddler
Legally he doesn't @@f12pushthekeys
@@cztkxz4102Misspelled “bitch”.
Those passengers are just absolutely the worst
Off duty cop acting like the pig he is
That's why I stuck to UberEats. Too many stories and I don't have the patience. I would go to jail.
he agreed to getting filmed after seeing the warning and still entering the car.
the guy was an off duty police officer as well apparently
Yes he was, and we all know nobody has less idea about the law than a cop
Yep. And he was trying to scam a free ride before he noticed the camera
What was his name? Where did this happen?
@@dylanogden9337 How do you scam a free ride? Payment is upfront thru the app
@@billolsen4360 im not sure of his name but it happened over a year ago, he was also quite threatening and extremely rude to the driver
I mean, the Uber driver’s behavior was immaculate from start to finish. 1000% would safe riding with him.
Yeah, seems like a good guy
I believe this is Driver Eddie and he does UA-cam videos. Check him out!
It was surprisingly civil on both sides, actually!
Getting into the car and continuing the ride is giving your consent. If you choose to remain in the vehicle and not cancel your ride after you see that sign then you have consented.
All of that is irrelevant considering courts have ruled that anything in public is legal to record.
hearing a lawyer say cap is just amazing
Is that some 12 year old talk or something? I don't understand it.
It is a new slang young people started using those days meaning " a lie" or lie.
Stop the cap! = stop the lie/stop lying!
@@6th_Armyit's that newfangled slang the kids use these days. Now get off my lawn.
@@6th_Armyit means lying. "no cap" would translate to "im not lying."
"you're capping" would mean "youre lying"
I have to speak in the same language that Gen Z understands! 😂
It’s absurd how many people in the US think they need to give others permission to record them in public
You may need permission from the property on which you are filming. Private property always. You cannot film if filming looks into a private residence additionally.
Everywhere belongs to someone and simply because they do not enforce it doesn’t mean they cannot at any time.
Especially true if it is seen as disruptive or interfering with traffic for example. This is the reason why technically any COMMERCIAL (this is where it gets abused by people with monetized content- who do not) filming usually requires a permit to film for tv and film if say on city state or county property.
Here is a typical example from the a USA city website…
You must follow City requirements to do commercial film or video work in the following locations in (city):
Streets, sidewalks or alleys
Park property
City Hall
But again even privately if you are a nuisance harassing or disruptive you can be asked to cease.
Right, ohh but if they want to film other people they will, and when someone films them they get all up in arms about it. Typical Americans
They’ll do it anyway but some states you ABSOLUTELY do. We have 2 party consent states.
@@katrina1668 you are probably referring to commercial use. This is not for that purpose unless he is using it say in a monetized fashion. Additionally audio recording vary by state and they generally use the language of needing both parties consent to RECORD. Audio… and the consent is dependent on being aware or unaware… they are aware so they are consenting by continuing to participate… hence the point of the brillant creator in the video “goodbye”.
Easy solution. Get enough people to vote against recording in public and they'll make a law against it 🙄 lol. Just film some quiet protesting from your home and raise enough social awareness that they'll begin posting laws against recording anyone in public.
“And that makes the _DASH CAM_ liable… for all of the damages, that happened next.”
"You don't have my consent to record.."
while also knew the camera is recording and facing it 😂😂😂 ..
A drunk cop trying to explain the law. That's 2x the arrogance.
He doesn't even know the law when sober 😂
you think that, but its acktually not 2x the ignorance, its ingorance².
How do you know the guy in vid was a cop?
@@Soy_Daddy there's a longer video. He says, "you know how I know that? Because i'm a police officer."
What police aren’t allowed to drink?
i prefer rideshare apps that have these cameras cos i feel like the driver is concerned for their own safety, thus they are not a threat to mine, plus i can prove my innocence, need be, i can also be sure if i left something behind!
We ain even tryna do nun in the car so I can be recorded all I want I know I’m not gonna do anything in the car 😂😂😂
I agree! I prefer when it’s recorded!
@@UgoLord your content is awesome man keep up the good work brother God bless
There are lots of videos of uber drivers going insane and attacking the passengers, and it was all recorded with the drivers cameras
It should be. And it should be. And it should be.
Your videos bring me so much joy. Professional, witty and fact filled. Thank you.
This people want to steal something on that car for sure.
I can only imagine him going in to a Walmart and asking employees to turn off the cameras because they don't have his consent 😅
That guy just felt like stretching his Karen muscles, eh?
If he never said anything absolutely noone would see the recording 😆
This guy is his own worst lawyer.
I love to hear a lawyer say “CAP!” 😂😂😂
The cameras are for his and yours protection
No. The cameras are for his protection not yours. If you get any benefit that is just an accidental bonus.
I am always amused when I watch a police cam show where they put someone in handcuffs "for the safety of both of us." Really? If handcuffs make us both safer why is the citizen always the one getting restrained?
@@aebalcperhaps he has his own safety mostly in mind, you can't fault him for that. But it DOES protect both parties. It's an objective record of the situation.
Your handcuff analogy doesn't fit with this situation at all. A camera doesn't restrain people. It's a deterrent.
But even then, handcuffs render a person less able to cause harm, so the cops don't have to be so on guard. A cop that's too highly strung can be prone to using excessive force. So if they make the detainee harmless, they don't themselves have any reason to harm
@@aebalcActually nope. There is a reason why people take Ubers and this is because it is to protect both the driver and the passenger.
You are trespassing.
Hell of a Uno Reverse!!!!
Perp prolly got warrants for arrest.
This guy was very beautiful in his actions. He made clear warnings, of which one should even be in the app, and when the passenger made it clear he did not have consent, he pulled over and ended the ride. Very good job.
I like the reversal at end w/ tresspassing lol
Yeah that's what I'd like to do too if I get in such a situation 😂
@@rypsterhc8673 Correction; telling someone to leave does not magically mean that person is suddenly trespassing. It only becomes trespassing once that person has willingly refused to do so.
Best of all, the full video, he says he knows it's illegal because he's a cop
Its nice to see a disagreement that doesnt resulting in people screeching slurs at each other and getting violent
Seems that camera protected this driver. At least they left civil
I love this channel. The way the lawyer is so energetic and explains everything - just makes me want to keep watching more and more. Love learning tidbits of legal rules!
That criminal was mad he was on camera so he couldn't take advantage of the business owner.
Dude was either getting ready to light up or rob him. Seeing the cameras ruined it for him.😂😂
It makes the security camera liable for all the emotions that happen next 😂😂
At least 95% of the time, when someone is bitching about something and says it's not legal, it's legal.
If a corporation is behind it. Corporations can do whatever they like.
The camera is understandable for the drivers and passengers protection
Exactly he has every right to record what if something bad happens to him
You have absolutely ZERO expectations of privacy inside of someone else’s car. Therefore they can record you in a one party consent state.
What about in a two party consent state?
@@B345T1N355Official It’s the only real question, was this in a one- or two-party consent state, and it isn’t even touched upon. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@@B345T1N355Official the notice on the door in this case could work as implied consent, and when he removed his consent he was asked to leave the vehicle.
@@StarWarsomania Absolutely. Because I can see in a two-party consent state where they have a case.
@@StarWarsomaniaYou are INFORMED.
How to get an Uber for free:
1. Looking for any smallest trouble possible and make it bigger to piss off the driver
3rd: there are some states like Indiana that You don’t need the other party consent.
There is no explanation of privacy in public.
This driver is the kind of guy I would chat and fool around in the car with while he drives me to where I want to go 😂😂
"Is absolutely CAP!..." 😂
Hey, props to both people here. The riders, while not in the legal right, didn’t want to be filmed and brought it up calmly. Then didn’t throw a fit or anything extreme and listened when asked to get out. This is how you handle conflict as an adult. Talk it out without anger, then walk away if you can’t agree
"You don't have my permission to film me"
"Say that to convenience owners who has security cams"
Passenger claims he’s a cop too lol
Imagine the dude watching this video and be like "Ahh shit"
This is especially legal if they are on a free record state where only the recorder need to consent in a public area, granted this is a lot more state by state so checks your local law but if your in a state that allows it dont let any karen or ken stop you
There's no expectation of privacy in public also.
You saying “absolutely cap” made my day. Thank you Mr.Food sniffer
Make no mistake, ladies and gentlemen... This guy was up to something. That camera saved that drivers life that day.
I’m convinced his face is permanently in that smile
Uber drivers need camera's, I've seen women accuse drivers of SA and the only thing that saved the driver was the dashcam
Serious question: Who would win an argument, Saul Goodman or this guy?
Saul would win if its money laundering
"His statement is absolutely CAP!" Bro I'm rolling🤣
I’ve resorted to speaking Gen Z 😂
@@UgoLord Cap should be legalese
@@UgoLordthank you bro it’s nice to see
@@UgoLordhahaha😄
Diminished expectation of privacy alone should be enough.
By agreeing to the terms and conditions of the Uber App, and entering the Uber Vehicle with visible signage warning you of recording. You are agreeing, and consenting, to being recorded.
They wanted to rob him or something, criminals hate cameras
The guy actually says that he's a cop in the full video lol
@@darron614exactly criminals hate cameras
@@moses3418 right that's why I thought it was funny
Repeat after me folks:
I have no expectation of privacy in public.
And the guy saying it’s illegal apparently is a cop. Just grand how uninformed he is.
on top of that, most states are one-party consent for recording. last time I checked there was only one or two that were two-party consent and some are zero party consent which allow third parties to record without the knowledge of either side.
Only people with bad intentions are the ones to conplain about recording. Why do i care if im being recorded, all they will get is hours of me staring at my phone
Bruh that was a gg moment
Well, if they didn’t record them, that would be a major safety problem … like these people are driving around complete strangers I wouldn’t do that
Not all states require consent from both parties.
The driver handled that smooth
The crazy part is he was probably thinking about robbing the guy until he seen the camera
10 minutes later that driver's app was locked by Uber for a report of "driving under the influence"
I’m glad they record. It protects me too.
That passenger 100% was planning mischief
“Absolutely Cap”
Funny as hell every time you say that
Making matters worse, that was a drunk off duty cop.
Passenger doesnt look like the kind of dude caring about consent
Every dropkick thinks they’re a lawyer.
Regardless if it was "public" (which its not, its still a private vehicle even when used for commercial use, it's not PUBLIC transit, and Uber is a private company) 38 out of 50 states are single party consent states, meaning in almost 80% of states he doesn't even have to inform them, and in the offhand chance he's in a dual consent he gave notice so regardless he'd be fine.
You really don't have to inform them I'm any US state, as long as your on public property or your property etc. The consent laws are only really brought up in court
Also, many states are one-party consent states. Wherein only one person involved in the interaction needs to consent to the recording of that interaction, and that person is usually the one doing the recording.
It seems like the older generations got some faulty information about consent being required to film in public.
18 years in law enforcement, people invent their own laws (that sound reasonable in their own mind), and they simultaneously believe the law they just made up…. Happens all the time… and then there are the “laws” they “learn” from movies…. The fact that they believe themselves so fervently is always astounding….
They didnt want to be recorded for when they went to rob him
You can record anyone anywhere they accessible to the public. I could walk by someone’s house and if you leave a window open anything I can see from the public sidewalk is legal to record.
Love that dude. He said “I smell bs time to go”😂😂😂😂😂😂
Those two have nothing but bs in their heads
His friend was looking like "dude, can you just shut up."
You can also shut down the guy with “The camera is there for my safety, not yours.”
#3 no expectation of privacy inside an uber. Don't need your consent.
It baffles me when people confidently state something completely wrong