Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Controlled Hover Test Flight | WIRED
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 чер 2011
- To find out more about this video, check out the story on Wired.co.uk here: www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2...
Subscribe to WIRED ►► po.st/SubscribeWired
This video collage provides several views of the robotic lander prototype during its second free flight test. The lander is captured in flight from overhead and side mounted cameras in high definition and infrared video. The infrared video allows engineers to see how the vehicle is behaving thermally as well as how the thrusters pulse during test since the thruster plumes are invisible to the naked eye.
CONNECT WITH WIRED
Web: po.st/VideoWired
Twitter: po.st/TwitterWired
Facebook: po.st/FacebookWired
Google+: po.st/GoogleWired
Instagram: po.st/InstagramWired
Magazine: po.st/MagazineWired
Newsletter: po.st/NewslettersWired
ABOUT WIRED
WIRED brings you the future as it happens - the people, the trends, the big ideas that will change our lives. An award-winning printed monthly and online publication. WIRED is an agenda-setting magazine offering brain food on a wide range of topics, from science, technology and business to pop-culture and politics.
Controlled Hover Test Flight | WIRED
/ wireduk
1:05 test successful
1:10 Flight test engineer giggling like a clown
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAA
1:13 what the Fuuuu😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂🤣 craziest laugh ever 🤪🤡🤣
@@dewalashape1224 oh for sure, I've been there before
Bro that's funny as heck
Laugh of a psycho
UA-cam has been holding out on me for 10 years before putting it in my recommendation list. Better late than never!
Jaw droppingly awesome. Thanks to the entire crew. That IS what it's all about! :)
and put into a filing cabinet never to see the moon. Sad
@CollapsingClouds
They just factor in the gravity in their results. They undoubtedly have formulas for testing which can take into account gravity, air density, air composition, etc. Remember, 42 years ago they put 2 humans on the moon using paper, pencils, and rulers.
What about landing and taking off from the moon? USA is an empire of lies! Terrorist number 1 in the world.
@@user-ht1ku4kk2g That's funny coming from a Russian account lol
Get out of Ukraine, then you can talk :)
@@WimsicleStranger Vietnam, Cuba, Guatemala, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and the list goes on. Looks like you have to shut up too.
@@WimsicleStranger thats funny coming from an american account get out of the middle east then you can talk :)
AWESOME keep it up guys.
Hello 2022! Look how far we’ve come!
Considering that SDI was doing this with one foot drones in the 80s. I'm unimpressed
Exactly, I just made a comment about that, I was also mentioning, how a structure below a propulsion system, would obliterate the structure.
and they LOOKEd much more (TIC-TAC) like IMO
For real. Everyday people are doing more amazing things in their garages. This is a pathetic use of tax dollars.
@@jwillkens 100
I would imagine that a craft that is designed to destroy ICBMs is much different than a craft meant to land on moons that are billions of miles away. Your own ignorance is laughable, idiot.
I used to look at this kind of stuff and think, wow look at what my country can do. Now I just wonder how they’ll use these things against us. SMFH.
that laugh lol
Awesome!
@illustriouschin Maybe it has something to do with the superheated air jets?
They're planning on putting this on robots that go to other planets for exploration. So, parachutes are useless on planets with no air where you have to land it.
If you was to connect jet thrusters instead of Brussels motors on a drone this is what you will have a an the interesting thing about it is it does not require oxygen or air for lift or propulsion it's the most robust thing you can design to do the job!!
Must be extraordinarily light
friggin nice balancing
Awesome
Here 11 years later.
They have to test this from another building because it's burning hyper toxic nitrogen tetroxide and hydrazine hypergolic fuels.
Very Nice, Very Nice.
@CuervoBlack06 I guess you have to love what you do
So cool 🤩
Was this filmed at pinewood studios??
This is why the pentagon investigates ufo's
To copy ALREADY existing technology? I highly doubt aliens use fossil fuels or chemical reactions for propulsion in combustion engines.
Nice
happy minute
Turn that dance club camera back on again.
@Winstonsicle ahahahh nice call
Takes them longer to check for ok with all directors than the flight 😂
This video would be better if the last word in the title was FAIL and the video followed suit.
I'm surprised with amount of FOD in the test area.
Im surprised anyone else actually knows what FOD is!
There's no ingestion hazard
Foreign object debris or foreign object damage is more related to aircraft
@999knives Somebody in the background says "That's what its all about"
Did I hear a chipmunk? lol
But can it juggle a tennis ball?
Are they using helium to stabilize the craft?
Page 219-1
Page 1057
saucer = n 1 a small round dish on which a cup is set. 2 any similar dish. [C14: from OF saussier container for SAUCE]
saucer = pi-ring
sauce = [C14: via OF from L salsus salted, from sal salt]
CF
IL
IR
OR
OL
L, R, C HB
L. R, FB
G Goaltender (goalie)
where can i buy one??
@halflifefan84 haha you just called the moon, mars.
Thats what its all about
what fuel is it burning?
Is that water on the floor?
There are a ton of hover videos from Masten Space Systems, Armadillo Aerospace, and Unreasonable Rocket/Paul Breed that are more impressive. But this was a good flight.
This was over 10 years ago...did any of those companies even exist back then? Lol...they ripped off NASA so what they've done recently isn't all that impressive.
@@frankiethebull8269 This video was 2011, Masten systems have been building successful robotic landers since 2006.
This guy came from 10 years in the future to let NASA know this critical information! 😂🔮
starhopper?
Somehow this video makes me remember of Iron Man 1.
Aerojet rocketdyne
10 years later... used on Mars
I wanted to be excited but I couldn't muster anything.
They have got the hangar, now they only need green walls.
russian troll
it's not kind of test😂 it's torture
NASA's budget $23.3 billion.
It should be much higher, if I'm honest.
How many years before spacex?
NASA was about 30 years ahead of SpaceX considering they had prototypes for re-usable self-landing rockets in the 90's. Sadly, the program was cut in favor of the shuttle program.
All that billions of dollars going into their pockets. They got to show something. 😂 I thought they already landed on the moon and then took off returned to earth with people inside...😂
They where ahead of their times then bureaucracy made them behind the times.
1:13
There's a reason this is coming into your algorithm. Stay tuned. Eyes up.
what reason could that be
@@petermueller7407 Google is putting the word out to all Americans to see if someone can come up with a better hover design for a certain space station that shall remain unnamed.
@@backseatpolitician what spacestation do u mean?
@@backseatpolitician You're an idiot. The ISS doesn't need a 'hover design' because it's sitting in orbit around the earth.
What was the year of this test???
It says the date, right in the first frame of the video...
Project Morpheus?
Brill
Can’t imagine how much tax payers money that was wasted on this.
probably 3 dollars
It will shoot you through your front window
Last century. A little more and the wheel will be reinvented.
Может и на Луну получится полететь?
Why there are not flame ?
Cold gas thrusters, probably.
I can now die peacfully?
its the 1960s all over again
What is the source of propulsion on these?
That big tank in the middle of the structure is a fuel tank comprising of fuel and LOX.
@@SheenylHassan What is LOX?
@@robertmendibles8440 liquid oxygen
Anyone know the fuel they are using that is smokeless?
It's hydrogen, that's why there's water on the floor, nothing new they've used that for decades and it's not the same type of fuel they use for the rockets. These are designed for atmosphere without oxygen.
@@frankiethebull8269 I think it might actually be Hydrogen peroxide.
Too bad NASA didn't build a space rocket engine that could do this.
so bad, I hope they dont plan to use that thing for human landing
Is This what the tick tack is?
Yup!! When I saw the tic Tac video this popped into my mind right away, not a lot of people remember these. I think they finally started making full scale versions of these and we saw one of them in that video.
we landed on the moon six times with a differing pilot no experience needed and never failed even one time
I have a feeling we REALLY lucked out with that period, considering how lax the specs and safety was compared to today. There's an alternate timeline where half the Apollo crews blew up on the launch pad, and the other half never got back to Earth.
would it be easier when it lands on a surface with 6 times less gravity? How do they test that?
They use math, that's what it's for.
@@frankiethebull8269 Math?
Smoke and mirrors more like!
@@DogSerious they implement constraints(gravity, weather condition, etc) to make it have hard time . No need for real conditions.
This thing burns money like a beast
@@elmichellangelo Not too bright, are you?
Très bon véhicule volant en vu,
est-ce à l'hydrogène vu l'eau, on dirais, laisser par terre ?
C'était il y a 10 ans
si, ca fonctionne grace aux peroxide d'hydrogen qui est se catalyse en oxygen est vapeur d'eau
Non, hypergolique, il n'ya pas de flamme. Avec de l'hydrogene comme essence, il y a une flamme.
now incorporate it into cars
How old were you when you posted this? You should be older now....you do it✊
and the lunar lander from Apollo with a much larger jet-engine never raised a storm of sand and covered Armstrong"s voice while landing even though they were sitting on it..literally..!!
Ah yes, the same old nonsense again.
@@SolarWebsite what do you mean?
@@lolok1099 Trolls in the same category as flat earthers and their likes.
@@lolok1099 The original commenter seem to doubt the veracity of the moon landings. I think that's what the reply was pointing out.
1:13 😂😂
Awesome guys!! Maybe in 1969 we could land on the moon!!!
Yeah! I wish to see that far away future..🤔
we went to the moon, what are you talking about?
@@Inckman452 he means like, this is old tech. basic stuff. why is this being lauded here?
@@thestreetlawyer1 ooh ok, thanks for the clarification.
Next time try without a wire. This thing will go into a wall! Then we could laugh like that clown there.
I thought NASA already hovered things in pretty much every way possible, what is so special about this one?
Already hovered things? Like what?😅 You mean when they land stuff on other planets? That has more to do with the lack of gravity rather than the propulsion system.
Ten years later...... I'm still waiting to see these hover craft you speak of.
@@frankiethebull8269 they just did, a year ago i think. Landed a lunar rover using a hover and crane propulsion system.
@@frankiethebull8269 I'm guessing you missed both the Curiosity AND the Perserverance landings? Idiot lol
Unimpressive wobbly technology, check. What's next?
Yes, it was very unimpressive. But now SpaceX uses similar technology. I suppose they were pioneers in their own right, even though all we see is a 1:30 boring video
Lots of fluid on the ground.....water? Were they using hydrogen as fuel?
Old School-Jet Pack chemistry ... hydrogen peroxide & silver catalyst ... H2O2 reacts with silver to produce high heat H2O(Steam)&O2. ... It sounded like they said they were using pumps instead of a nitrogen push gas. ... I would like to see the same thing done with cold trust.
Doesn't work. Still good work
Just remember, once we create a real AI these things will be chasing you down the street.
Nah, they’ll just render all machines useless and wait for us to starve
lol!
Starwars Drone 😂
I made one of those for my school science fair , with a plastic bottle , some cola and poprocks … what’s so impressive here? Invent a teleporter then I’ll be impressed
@Prospekt0r Well sorry my opinion isn't as perfect as yours. Space travel gets us where.... discover new life OR new planets? Hmm nice. What's the point of discovering new life when we can't even feed our entire world? Please, share with me the point of this.
Tricopter with cgi flame effect suppose to be a rocket engine ? This thin stream would not be as stabile !
Remember we didn’t have falcon 9 or any space vehicle can be controlled easily with their own rcs or passively. This was still an early age.
not true, lockheed had already vertically launched and landed massive rockets in the 80s.
False, NASA made several (scaled down) rockets that were supposedly capable of SSTO flight AND had a extremely lower turnaround than Musk's 52 days, they managed to refuel and could be re-flown in only 26 hours. This was in the 90's. Sadly the program's funding was cut in favor of the space shuttle.
Are these vehicles hydrogen peroxide propelled?
rocket scince
My $400 drone does that...
Was your $400 drone, doing this 13 years ago??
P.S. Did you thank your mommy for the cool birthday gift?
😂😂😂😂
Ох уж этот смех в конце видео.
I mean we don't need propellers nor gas to fly a hardware... hummmm UFO's anybody?
Hahaha... Brings back my good old Redstone Arsenal days...
Still ain't been to the moon. Just FYI.
I have 😎
@@shadowkillz9606 Everyday @420 or nah
@@ABMNATN Nah, there's a park nearby called Möõn
I wonder why there's so many idiots on these neat videos. Flat earthers, moon landing deniers, you name it. Idiots like you come out in droves lol
Just 10 years ago this was a technological feat. Now SpaceX rockets use this same method to air-brake and land their own rockets that travel into space. That is really something
F2FC? It was dancing because of the I gaine was to high so it was wanting to drift D gaine could be decreased as we'll but regardless this is cool stuff an Elon musk thanks he's doing something new but that's not the case it's just scald up with a a bad ahh gyro/Fc!!
Elon be like are you guys happy with yourself? I built one of those when I was six.
Elon had his Daddy pay someone smart to build this when he was 6...
Fixed it for ya...Muskrat.
Seems suspect…how does it stay straight without any vector nozzle?
Seems to me the thrusters can adjust the rotation of the vehicle.
Ha ha ha😄😄😄😄😃😄😃😃😃😄😃
This is way before space X.