1964 chrysler imperial is not a chrysler

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 лис 2024
  • 1964 Chrysler Imperial is not a Chrysler?
    Yup not a Chrysler. Chrysler was trying to make a stand alone brand to compete with Lincoln and Cadillac. So the Imperial was to be it's own brand.
    So is this car as good as the competition, like Lincoln or Cadillac? Some say it's even better. No expense was spared in the construction of this car.
    It's large, heavy, quiet and comfortable. It has all power feature you could imagine.
    I was an exclusive automobile. These car were built for specific customers IE: Ordered from the factory. Each car was built for a specific client. This car was made for Florence Henderson.
    It's one of 922 Crown Convertibles made in 1964. The cost of a base model is almost 6000.00 dollars. That's crazy money in 1964 when an average car cost around 2500.00 dollars.
    Why so expensive. In this veideo I'll show you why. Give you a brief history. Show you all the cool facts and features of the car.
    See what power and prestige in America was all about in the 1960's when the Big Three ruled supreme.
    Thank you for tuning in.
    Please Like & Subscribe
    Comments and encouraged and appreciated
    Thanks again,
    Troy Kane
    vtwinstov8s.com​
    / vtwinstov8s.com​
    / ​
    / troymkaneinc​
    New Videos uploaded on Weekly
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 107

  • @danscales4578
    @danscales4578 5 місяців тому +2

    In my opinion, there was no better interior design than the 1964 imperial, simply the best, the attention to detail and craftsmanship was second to none; even Cadillac could not match it , Lincoln closer. Cadillac was a common example of affluence, while Imperial represented extraordinary, taste class, and refinement!

  • @kevinz8930
    @kevinz8930 Рік тому +4

    Back in the late seventies a friend of mine had a 1961 in black. We called it the Batmobile.
    This one is Beautiful. Spectacular automobile. I would love to have one. Thanks for sharing.

  • @LynxStarAuto
    @LynxStarAuto Рік тому +4

    Want to have your mind blown? 🤯 this vehicle's MSRP was 6k in 64, which is roughly 59k in today's money.
    Now look at what you got in 1964 for 60k. A hand build vehicle, built specifically for you, to your specifications, with a laundry list of options... VS a run of the mill BMW 4 series, or a pick up truck. With a handful of options, many that are forced on you as a package. And hopefully, those features are not locked away behind a subscription pay wall.
    Auto industry really went to hell in a hand bracket.

  • @bobdavis3357
    @bobdavis3357 5 місяців тому +1

    That is correct. Imperial was it's own brand within Chryco.

  • @williamshaffer9216
    @williamshaffer9216 Рік тому +9

    Beautiful Automobile. 1964-1966 Imperials are a personal favorite of mine! You produced a great video!!!

    • @troykane
      @troykane  Рік тому

      Thank You for the kind words my friend

  • @markhooper1352
    @markhooper1352 Рік тому +6

    Tremendous lineage with this vehicle - Ms Henderson was indeed a classy, successful young 30yo when she special ordered it. Most inspiring and interesting history, thanks so much for the post!

  • @jamesh7571
    @jamesh7571 9 місяців тому +1

    In my senior opinion, it's pretty freaking awesome dude!
    I've always loved these creampuffs 👍

  • @user-wp8zd5xf7v
    @user-wp8zd5xf7v Рік тому +6

    The 1966 Imperial shared the same body, and of course, that included the same wrap-around windscreen. The 1967 Imperial featured the next generation windscreen.

    • @jerrycallender9352
      @jerrycallender9352 6 місяців тому

      "...shared the same body..." with What?

    • @jerrycallender9352
      @jerrycallender9352 6 місяців тому

      @billmcdevitt1298 1957-1968 Imperials shared no body parts with any Chrysler.

    • @jerrycallender9352
      @jerrycallender9352 6 місяців тому

      @billmcdevitt1298 Nope. I refuse to continue mental battle with an unarmed adversary.

    • @jerrycallender9352
      @jerrycallender9352 6 місяців тому

      @billmcdevitt1298 Do I own one what?

    • @jerrycallender9352
      @jerrycallender9352 6 місяців тому

      @billmcdevitt1298 Chrysler was unibody since 1960. Imperial was a body on frame until 1969.

  • @bigjoe330
    @bigjoe330 Рік тому +4

    Absolutely stunning in every aspect.🇺🇸👍 You had great taste Mrs. Brady! 💕

  • @davidyoas3137
    @davidyoas3137 Рік тому +3

    Just got one today that has been parked in a garage since the 80,s and it’s a convertible

  • @tombrown1898
    @tombrown1898 Рік тому +3

    1966 was the last year for the wraparound windshield. The first year was 1957! Same windshield, same cowl. The power vent mechanism was purchased from General Motors.

    • @troykane
      @troykane  Рік тому

      Awesome! Good stuff

    • @tombrown1898
      @tombrown1898 Рік тому +2

      @@troykane Troy, glad to help! Chrysler registered Imperial as a separate marque from 1955-1975. Before and after that period, Imperial was a higher-trim New Yorker. 1964 was the last year of the pushbutton Torque Flight transmission all across the Mopar line. The buttons first appeared in 1956. 1955 Mopar models had this weird little lever sticking straight out of the dash.

  • @MisterMikeTexas
    @MisterMikeTexas Рік тому +1

    Carol Brady once owned this car! How cool is that?

  • @anthonybianchini5144
    @anthonybianchini5144 Рік тому +2

    I have a Royal Turquoise 66' Imperial Crown Convertible. White interior. ALL options. In the same condition as this one.

  • @michaelmcknight5471
    @michaelmcknight5471 9 місяців тому +2

    I had a 1964 Imperial Crown 4 door. I loved that car. I’ve never had a car that drove as well. I’ve owned two Rolls Royce. This car tops them all. I have a 1970 Oldsmobile 98 convertible now. I want an Imperial convertible but I haven’t found one that I could afford at the time I found it.

    • @jerrycallender9352
      @jerrycallender9352 6 місяців тому +1

      I had a 1966 Crown 4-door hardtop and I concur with your comments.

  • @billmagorian490
    @billmagorian490 Рік тому +6

    64 Imperial Best looking year in the 60's

  • @boydsdodge
    @boydsdodge Рік тому +4

    Fantastic looking Imperial. Great work.

  • @aleksinfroid4644
    @aleksinfroid4644 6 місяців тому +1

    Always loved those old Dodge's, especially their rag tops.

    • @DanHolmes-o9b
      @DanHolmes-o9b 3 місяці тому

      All of the Mopars 50s-60s. 👍

  • @rayfridley6649
    @rayfridley6649 Рік тому +3

    This would be the last year for the push button transmission selector. Starting in the model year 1965, Chrysler began equipping their cars with shifter selectors, same as their competition. Driver education people was active for identical automatic transy selector controls on all cars.

  • @harolddavis2580
    @harolddavis2580 7 місяців тому

    Beautiful car. Thanks for sharing. I remember our high school principal having a four door Imperial, I though it was so cool 😎

  • @67polara
    @67polara Рік тому +2

    Beauty of a car! Loved my 69 Imp LeBaron !

  • @flguy1193
    @flguy1193 Рік тому +1

    Great video! Love classic cars like this. And for the record, the purchase price of $6000 for this car in 1964 is about $59,000 in 2023 dollars (according to Google on-line search results).

    • @troykane
      @troykane  Рік тому

      Awesome thanks for the research

  • @slumlord2008
    @slumlord2008 Рік тому +1

    Beauty, i have a 63 Crown 4 door hardtop. 46 k original miles, great land yaught. gets lots of looks...

    • @troykane
      @troykane  Рік тому

      Awesome! Thanks for the comment

  • @markjohnson9485
    @markjohnson9485 Рік тому +2

    Simply Beautiful car, your restoration job is amazing! I love what you've done. I wonder how long Florence owned it.

    • @troykane
      @troykane  Рік тому +1

      Thank You! I don't know how long she had it.

  • @hankhallowell
    @hankhallowell Рік тому +4

    The 64 Imperial Crown Convertible is simply the most fabulous convertible ever made by anyone at anytime. It is a slap in the face to my Eldorado convertibles and my Rolls Corniche. I own all of them, so I know.
    If you ever have an opportunity to ride in one….take it.
    This particular car is magnificent.❤

  • @jerrycallender9352
    @jerrycallender9352 6 місяців тому +2

    ONLY the transmission and some engines were shared with Chryslers.
    NOTHING MORE!

  • @joefoster4415
    @joefoster4415 Рік тому +2

    great info, i have two of these , one coupe and a convertible both are the same factory color

  • @guglielmo64
    @guglielmo64 Рік тому +2

    Gorgeous Imperial!

  • @timothelambert5147
    @timothelambert5147 6 місяців тому +1

    Its a shame what happened to Chrysler their Imperials wore beautiful.

  • @rick0e295
    @rick0e295 Рік тому +3

    Unfortunately Chryslers attempt to compete with Lincoln, Cadillac (and what was left of Packard in 1955) never quite pushed it to the top in spite of being (as advertising called it) the INCOMPARABLE Imperial. Truly love these LAND YACHTS, a monument to OTT excessive American chromed luxury of the time! Unfortunately, a time we will NEVER see again. For me, the 61 LeBaron was the pinnacle, with limo like roof and fins actually an inch or two higher than fabled 59 Cadillac. Engels 64 and up were also beautiful, but not quite as spectacular as Exners fabulous finned fantasies. Sad to see what little remains of Chrysler and all autos.. For me the last REAL Chrysler was 80s RWD Fifth Avenues.

    • @troykane
      @troykane  11 місяців тому +3

      My Dad was a Mopar guy he had a Fifth Avenue.

    • @rick0e295
      @rick0e295 11 місяців тому +2

      ​@@troykaneI had 83 and 85 Fifth Avenues both silver with matching plush velvet interior. To me they easily held their own with subsequent Town Cars and RWD FLEETWOODS.

    • @taylorsopko5807
      @taylorsopko5807 10 місяців тому +1

      Definitely the last real Chrysler, i have an 89 fifth avenue.

    • @rick0e295
      @rick0e295 10 місяців тому

      @@taylorsopko5807 I had 83 and 85 RWD Fifth Avenues. Great luxurious, comfortable and with Formal roof provided a luxury vehicle which held its own with subsequent Fleetwoods and Town Cars!

  • @donhathaway3234
    @donhathaway3234 3 місяці тому

    One of the nicest looking cars ever!

  • @peterdelestrez8880
    @peterdelestrez8880 Рік тому +1

    Beautiful color.

  • @jeffreypinder9398
    @jeffreypinder9398 Рік тому +1

    Beautiful automobile...excellent job.

  • @seymourscagnetti1413
    @seymourscagnetti1413 10 місяців тому +1

    Considering minimum wage in 1964 was $1.25 an hour, $6,000 was small fortune. Imperial put Cadillac and Lincoln to shame.

  • @johnfitcheard7112
    @johnfitcheard7112 Рік тому +2

    Beautiful car!

  • @billsmopars4927
    @billsmopars4927 Рік тому +1

    Great work. What a beauty!

  • @datsun210
    @datsun210 Рік тому +1

    That is a lot of car for Florence Henderson. Any idea how long she drove it for?

  • @fourpoint64
    @fourpoint64 Рік тому +2

    plus full gauges!!! not idiot lights

  • @hungarianmopedcommunity
    @hungarianmopedcommunity Місяць тому +1

    Are the seatbelts were standard on these cars? My family has a 64 imperial crown sedan, and there are no seatbelts in the car! How could this be?

    • @troykane
      @troykane  Місяць тому

      I don't know, maybe they were an option?

  • @MisterMikeTexas
    @MisterMikeTexas Рік тому +1

    With that mother-in-law crack, I don't think the host will be getting a fruitcake this Christmas! 😁

  • @Tony-hx2fj
    @Tony-hx2fj Рік тому +1

    absolutely beautiful

  • @joeharkins7476
    @joeharkins7476 Рік тому +1

    Just beautiful

  • @martinburke362
    @martinburke362 Рік тому +1

    Masterpiece!!

  • @knowbodiesfull5768
    @knowbodiesfull5768 Рік тому +1

    The 1966 Imperial was the last American automobile with a wrap-around windshield. _(1/1/2023)_

  • @tomquinn1192
    @tomquinn1192 9 місяців тому

    Gorgeous!

  • @knowbodiesfull5768
    @knowbodiesfull5768 4 місяці тому

    The Vermont plates look as if they were meant for the car. They match the color of the car - and the last two digits happen to be "64"! Coincidence?

  • @bc5441
    @bc5441 Рік тому +1

    So huge and so wide but only one outside mirror! Drivers used to have much better peripheral vision…

    • @troykane
      @troykane  Рік тому

      People could drive. And had some common sense

  • @Thankingyou1
    @Thankingyou1 9 місяців тому

    Is this car for sale?

  • @davidalan7
    @davidalan7 Рік тому

    absolutely gorgeous

  • @anthonybianchini5144
    @anthonybianchini5144 Рік тому +2

    Your title state it's "not" a Chrysler - agree. Then you go on to state "Chrysler Imperial" multiple times in the video...

    • @troykane
      @troykane  Рік тому

      Well....Let's face it. It is a Chrysler.

    • @bk14nyc
      @bk14nyc Рік тому +1

      @@troykane then how come they don’t call Edsel a FORD Edsel?

    • @moesizlac2596
      @moesizlac2596 Рік тому +1

      @@bk14nyc "Edsel" is an actual name, of an actual person. "Imperial" is more adjective than noun. It is too generic. Brands have identities that people identify with. The word "Imperial" has many negative and impersonal connotations. And it was a model before Chrysler tried to make people believe it was more special. The cars are pretty special, but the branding was empty headed with only legal papers filed. It had no dealer network, it had nothing separate from Chrysler. Nobody believed it then and it is not worth getting defensive about now. Chrysler gave up their charade, so should anyone really get very butt hurt? No.

  • @RS-yu4lb
    @RS-yu4lb 10 місяців тому

    Stereo system ?

  • @johnellis2347
    @johnellis2347 Рік тому +2

    Trying to be a Mopar supporter is like being a republican in south Chicago and all the criticism and lies you get from the Buick and Chevy guys. Funny thing it was so Chrysler who saved Buick. They hired him in 1915 cause sales were down to 60,000 a year. In two years he had straightened Buick out and got sales to 600,000. They can't stand that.

  • @steventhorson4487
    @steventhorson4487 Рік тому

    Awesome ❤️ 💯 👌

  • @michaelwallbrown3726
    @michaelwallbrown3726 Рік тому

    6:29 is that John Holmes?

  • @kelvinrf
    @kelvinrf Рік тому +1

    Just think how many more would have been wrecked if they were allowed to enter demolition derbies.

    • @troykane
      @troykane  Рік тому

      Probably saved a lot of cars.

  • @williamg2552
    @williamg2552 Рік тому +2

    He admits, that the IMPERIAL was a standalone brand, (true) but he still calls it, a “Chrysler” Imperial. (false).

    • @JoeMama-ds8he
      @JoeMama-ds8he 4 місяці тому

      Big deal. And Trump said shithole.

  • @jamesmyers9285
    @jamesmyers9285 5 місяців тому

    It is AWESOME and BEAUTIFUL! Too bad Chrysler had been owned by Losers who didn't appreciate their history.

  • @reubenfebus4087
    @reubenfebus4087 Рік тому

    Mother-law😂

  • @TheGnewb
    @TheGnewb Рік тому +1

    I am not getting this fully, I mean a Volkswagen Beetle that was made in Brazil is still a Beetle and if it was made in Mexico, is still a beetle. If Imperials were made were made by the Imperial car and corporate shenanigans llc, at a chrysler owned building, they would be and are Chryslers.

    • @MisterMikeTexas
      @MisterMikeTexas Рік тому

      It's a Chrysler product, but not branded as a Chrysler.

    • @Sonormuseum
      @Sonormuseum 4 місяці тому

      Is a Lincoln a Ford? No. It’s a separate division of the Ford Motor Company, just like Cadillac is a division of GM, just like Imperial at that time was a separate division within the Chrysler Corporation.