"I used to be an atheist, but then my wife turned into christinanity and i had to make a choice between staying an atheist, or getting laid on a regular basis." is all i heard from the first speaker >.
So finely tuned to exist in one minuscule part of the universe which is like saying that you must give me my pension because I went to work for 1 femtosecond.
This is why Christopher is so missed. To have the balls to go in the ring with 4 theist plus 1 extra in guise of a moderator. To have the mental courage to do so. It’s says something about a person. And mind you , it looks easy for the atheistic side cause Christopher makes it look easy. You will be missed sir.
37:46 _"Imagine how she must have prayed everyday, how she must have beseeched heaven. Imagine for twenty four years and no, no answer at all, nothing! _*_Nothing!_* Goodness me what a moment. It's very satisfying to see a very unfiltered version of the anger he must feel towards religion.
@@LMFAORomania women are treated as property especially daughters. Look them up...all old testament stuff. Like...selling them into slavery, killing them whenever you want...ect. It's all there.
@@at6686 Could it be anger at those who presents the God delusion as something worthwhile to entertain? On what sadistic grounds you have to stand to pretend that what that women went through can be compensated in any way. It's not like she was asked for that bargain.
Hitchens has the patience of Job, lol. Thank you sir for helping me on my journey of letting go of catholicism and instead embracing reality more authentically, and in fact more lovingly.
Nah, they brought knives to a gun fight. Wish someone would edit out all this skydaddy crap. But then again this piece will lose its masterful illustration of how man invented god.
That statement is not true, not constructive and is in fact de-constructive. I'm not gonna argue about the speakers or the subject we probably agree on most things, but I don't agree on your attitude towards the 'other side in fact i vehemently disagree with any gratous demeaning comment against theists. Why? You are not doing any good to the furthering of atheism and more generally rational critical thinking. Imagine being a theist reading that. And imagine you actually also made real pertinant points that had not been answered. I can guarantee 99.99% of people will instantly dismiss all of your comment because it was felt as an unjustified (or plain) attack. It's dumb it's unrelated but people take critism of their beliefs as critisism of them and more so the stronger held. You are basically attacking the most fundamental central pillar of a belief and that is equivalent to you giving them a get out of jail card. You give them an espace route, oh that bastard is just a godless immoral atheist look at how he is full of hate on our poor religion, people hate christians so much we are constantly attacked- in the meantime not even having to dismiss your actual points, why give any time to the raving comments of a demonised adversary? I understand where the sentiment comes from believe me, and i ve been far more brutal in many conversations with thiests. Not proud nor ashamed i'd be gzntler on some but not everyone deserveq your good will, and sometimes you just get angry no big deal, the difference is between attacking a person which is perfectly fine if merited, and attacking an ideology solely by mocking, which is actually helping said ideology by protecting it from critisism.
Again i understand and i m not saying you should never do it just to be clear. Personally i find that it is sometimes the right thing to do in my moral code (utilitarian in moral philosophy terms) is attacking islam without any reason, not muslims but just bashing the religion a bit with true harsh arguments. Because i feel theu are wining the war against free speach and trying to ban critism, i will not let that happen
@@alexisjuillard4816 wow what a loser you are. You just typed an essay to yourself because trust me, no one gives a flying fluck what your opinion is. You must be really lonely to want to type for 10 minutes to yourself
@@kellygipson8354 you edited your comment that was 1 sentence long, barely. I’d advise you not to give your unsolicited opinion. Especially if it consists of a single sentence that you can’t get right the first time
From William Lane Craig First of all I think that god is the best explanation for why anything exists rather than nothing ……fumbling with babble….... and it seems to me that an argument along these lines is valid and cogent (Here’s the actual point) Whatever exists has an explanation of its existence, either in the necessity of its own nature or else in an external cause , if the universe has an explanation of its existence then that explanation is god and the universe obviously exists from that it follows that if the universe has an explanation of its existence then god exists , and since that first premise requires that I think that this is a good argument for gods existence , that one could defend in more detail. (Possibly more detail is required) (I am quite sure that I transcribed this accurately, I did leave out some uhms) I’m going to try to summarise this in good faith Actually I’ve just read it again and it doesn’t need summarising as it was quite short , it may have just seemed longer due to the mental gymnastics required to take the massive leap that he did So I will rephrase If something exists it has an explanation The only explanation for the existence of the universe is god And the universe obviously exists Therefore god exists It seems like I am twisting his words , his words were very twisted to begin with. (Reread/relisten to what he said , here is the massive leap that he made {if the universe has an explanation of its existence then that explanation is god} I must stress again , see the curly brackets, he actually said that.) If he didn’t speak so fast and the audience was less deferential and less polite he may have been laughed off stage for that It would be a compliment to call that argument sophistry Amazing that he claimed at the end that Christopher didn’t address the arguments and advised him to be better prepared
What’s really scary and alarming is how one can’t see how Hitchens bitch slapped each opponent with pure reason and logic ... to understand how he did it you simply have to say to yourself “ can a spider man comic book actually prove the existence of spider man?” ... if you can’t understand this analogy then you’ve got a bigger problem than you think .. all religion and god(s) like comic books and super hero’s - are man made.
The desire for structure and purpose is so overwhelming for these theists that it is disturbing. What could be more narcissistic and arrogant than thinking one is a member of a chosen class of people, and that one knows the will of God? They are so afraid of freedom and liberty. So afraid to make a choice based on reason and logic. So afraid to live in a World without a totalitarian Father.
That makes absolutely no sense what you just said. “Based on reason and logic”? Where do you get off of telling someone what to do or to even call something logic when we’re just matter acting on time and space. That means there is no meaning or purpose or even thinking for that matter that should matter at all. We’re just stardust colliding with each other. Even atheist make me laugh because there logic is so flawed. A true atheist if one didn’t really believe in God wouldn’t be here commenting on UA-cam videos because there is not sense in actually commenting if where just time and space acting on matter. Even your thinking pattern of composing a sentence is illogical how can we show you’re right, how can we prove that logic even exist if we just evolved into what we are? Whose to say that is even true? Atheist sound like the far left who say men can be women and women can be men. It’s all ludicrous when you speak because there is not such thing as objective truth in an atheist world view. So why bother with literally anything. Why care about evil and good if there is no objective truth. And if we developed this objective truth how do we even know it’s right. I swear atheist stand on such High ground thinking they are superior in intellect when you’re own intellect you brag about isn’t even founded on nothing, its wrong or right but how would we know?
@@esdrassalgado8850 dude, the American Santa Claus isn't real. He's not a fat old white guy with a white beard and bald head. He never had a wife. There's no Easter bunny. There are no fairies. There is no God, gods, goddesses hanging around in the sky behind the clouds. Behind the clouds is outer space. There is nothing out there but the cosmos, and no, there are no spiritual realms out there. Stop fantasizing.
@@we8608 you’re the one who believes in fairytales thinking things can just pop into existence out of nothing. Let me guess you believe genies in lamps are real too huh? You’re the type of kid who thought money grew on trees growing up, Probably hecka privileged too. Pull your head out the clouds fam and think with your brain. Nothing has ever and will ever just pop into existence, especially something as complicated as a universe let alone life. People like you need to stop living in Lala land and come back down to reality.
@@esdrassalgado8850 your entire diatribe is pointless drivel. You not only lack any concept of logic, toy also have no concept of life. Do you need a pathetic sky dictator to have meaning in your life? I certainly don't. My life is full of meaning, no mind numbing, idiotic superstition required. Do some research on logic and reasoning before you attempt to speak to it, you've only shown how ignorant you are. And you're 100% correct, i, like many atheists do hold myself on higher ground intellectually. You cannot have true intelligence and believe any religious garbage at the same time
I went to a Conservative Christian Camp somewhere in southern Kansas back in June of 1993 when I was 12 years old. We had a counselor who was speaking to us children and teenagers who were 11-14 years old. This man in his 20s looked at every last one of us and said now you know we all to deserve to burn in hell for eternity and if it wasnt for Jesus we all would be. My heart I thought was going to jump right out of my throat and I was so enraged. My blood was boiling, my body shook violently, and I wanted to walk right up to that guy and kick him right in the balls. I dont see how anyone can live with themself or look someone in the face and say something so hideouly wickedly immoral to children, teenagers, or anyone for that matter. Oh, they would say were just teaching them that because it is only the truth. There is not even one shred of credible evidence to back up that claim. Thank You Christopher, you will be missed.
Maybe after your counselor said all those stupid remarks about how you are doomed to hell---he later said privately to each kid you can be redeemed if you make me happy as he put his hands in private places.
Mordecai Ruckman are you joking or are you just stupid? He didn’t want to kick the guy in the balls for not having evidence. He wanted to kick the guy in the balls for telling 11 - 14 year olds that that they would and do deserve to suffer for eternity except for the salvation of Jesus, for which there is no evidence.
@@dentonfender8872 Nowadays with less people in church there’s child predators elsewhere. child indoctrination is like a mental molestation of young minds though.
“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence comes evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?" _Epicurus_
He said once You have to have your heart on fire but your head on ice I might’ve got those the wrong way around He really does believe that religion poisons everything Case and point the men on stage with him , it’s hard to say whether or not they are intelligent when they are so thoroughly indoctrinated, but imagine if they had never heard the good word of the lord , they would probably still have their morals and would probably spend their time more productively do more good and live more fulfilling lives Hence religion poisons everything It has probably been said before, but it is my personal belief that organised religion is the work of the devil
hackum1 Thank "God", Indeed! I can only envision Christopher rolling his eyes at such a statement. We, Christopher and I, both perceive the graciousness of the sentiment, as well as the irony.
I can't tell you how nice it is for once to scroll through the "top comments" and see zero whiny and personally offended pissed off Christians acting exactly like someone their God wouldn't like.
I listened more than once to understand what each was saying and found that Hitchens is mostly a lot of talk without much substance to the arguments that the other speakers brought up. I notice on this post that most all posts are positive about Christopher. 😊
@@enriquefranco6330 on the contrary, I find very little substance in a deity who ignores his chosen creation for millennia, and then reveals itself only to a select few in a select location instead of to the entire world, without corroborative accounts in history and archeology. This is one of the most compelling arguments against monotheism I’ve ever heard, and I remember first hearing it from Christopher Hitchens. As for its rebuttal presented here, I would respond that there are far more practical written works for our present times than the Bible. The US Constitution comes to mind as one example.
@@enriquefranco6330 the arguments the others bring up have no substance. Their entire argument is either "you have to have faith", or "it says in the buy-bull ...". How rational.
"We have to be brothers, one with another", Hitchens "Why?", Douglas "We have to fight this off", Hitchens "Why?", Douglas "For our own survival. For our children's sake", Hitchens
The most interesting part of this debate was the part regarding the cosmological constants and the "fine tuning" of the universe and so on. This is an argument that falls on its own unreasonableness. The vast majority of the universe is fiercely inhospitable to life, or at least carbon-based life, due to radiation, temperature, gravity, and so forth, i.e. not fine-tuned by any means. And it is mind-boggling in the first place that people are surprised to find themselves on a planet that allows for life. Nobody will ever find themselves asking that question on a planet that does *not* allow for life. It is a self-fulfilling, circular, recursive argument which, of course, is and always will be the very trademark of unjustified and wishful thinking, more commonly known as religion.
This discussion is really hilarious, comical! I am not sure how Mr. Hitchens could keep his composure and not roll on the floor laughing. These guys in suits making these jokes with a straight face is really entertaining. They actually belive what they are saying :)
Who else fast forward to hear only the great Christopher Hitchens rhetoric? Christopher's patience dealing with these imbecilic deluded morons is amazing..May his mellifluous voice continue to enlighten the thinking man for thousands of years! Oh Yes!!
It wasn't at all 'brave' for Hitchens to attend this discussion. It was an opportunity for Hitch to educate, humiliate and honor them with his presence!!! I swear Craig is such a douchebag with all his babble. 🤣🤣 No real challenge for Hitch, he out wits, and shines everytime! I've yet to meet his genius equal. The greatest orator, wordsmith, and comedic delivery, I've ever witnessed. I will forever listen to him, miss him, and so grateful for the best professor I've ever had! Cheers to the late great Hitch!!!🍻🥂
10000% agree. I've watched this and other Hitchens debates multiple times. Read his books multiple times. He was a master that truly left this earth too soon. I wish more idiots, I mean religious people would hear him and break the disgusting cycle of hate, fear, self loathing, and violence caused by their beliefs in a celestial boogeyman
The dude at the podium started this off with a near minute long commercial for their magazine subscriptions. That informed me of the caliber of the "thought leaders" on that stage sitting with Christopher.
There are times when you come across a person who was ahead of their time, this man's intellect was wasted on these people I believe his words if said today could change the world.
Angry alcoholic who thought the war in Iraq was a roaring success till his dying day lest he admit to being wrong about something. In the words of his own brother, " Man is not great" Peter Hitchens.
@@XYisnotXX He objectively wasn't an alcoholic, his rationale for supporting the war in iraq was sound given his principles. and why would you listen to a word his brainwashed christian conservative brother has to say?
@@andrewz4105 The war in Iraq was an oil grab nothing more, the dogs in the street knew there were no naughty weapons of mass destruction. He was obliterated in debate by his own brother over the war and made to look like a fool! His alcoholism contributed greatly to his early demise along with his heavy smoking. Why should I listen to his superiors? Well unlike him there don't believe that magic interactions between random magic unguided chemicals acting apon more magic random unguided chemicals inside of magic matter (in this case his brain matter) creating such a miraculous effect as proper logical inference and truth for which there is absolutely no evidence of any description whatsoever. " Man is not great " Peter Hitchens.
This debate should be titled 4 retards vs. a real intellectual. It is shameful that in the 21st century people still believe this nonsense, and the 4 frauds and con men on stage are shameful ignoramuses whose whole purpose is to deliberately dupe and mislead indoctrinated and credulous people who have never been exposed to anything other than a dusty old 3,000 year old book that they have been told from the day they were born was the only thing they needed to know, and hitchens, one of the great truth bearers on this subject, went too soon.
No proof of supernatural power, thousands of gods created by humans in our short time on this planet, a panel of faith believers, and 1 genius. We miss you Christopher.
When Sam Harris accused Christians of playing tennis without the net, this is what he was talking about. On the one hand they say the father raped his daughter in a dungeon because God gave him free will and it would be a slippery slope to intervene. Then later when Christopher said he was hardwired to love his daughter they said it's because God hardwired/programmed him that way. It's hard to think on your feet when it's 1 vs 5 but I wish he would have pointed out that if God hardwired him to love his daughter then he also hard wired the man to rape and torture his daughter.
Now I've seen many Hitchens's debates and I think it's impossible to beat him in a discussion. Never seen it happen and can't imagine what it would look like.
He's lost you because what he's saying is the most ill-formed logical presentation In the world. No unbiased philosopher or scientist would take it seriously. "The universe must have had a cause therefore God loves us" it's ridiculous. I'm not sure he doesn't have learning difficulties. The problem isn't your ability to follow his arguments, the problem is his inability to make an argument that logically follows.
Craig doesn't need any help with that. It happens as soon as he opens his mouth. "If it's even POSSIBLE that there is a universe where Santa Claus exists, it therefore proves that Santa Claus exists!" Better make sure I'm on the nice list!!!
From about 35 minutes in until Hitchens stops speaking proves to me that he was a masterful rhetorician. Sometimes I imagine his monologues in another accent and, though they lose a little something, they are still powerful and moving. Fuck cancer.
There's something I've never understood about how Christopher responded to the moral question, why doesn't he just concede that morality is subjective and part of an evolutionary process. It wouldn't put him on the back foot because surely the point is that modern imperfect humanism is inherently still better than the imaginary objectivity of bronze age religious doctrine, they always seem to work him into a corner with that one.
+Maestro Gee yeah I've wondered something similar, I feel like you could say even less than "subjective part of an evolutionary process". They act like it's a cornering question, but knowing where our morality comes from doesn't seem like an important question.
contactkeithstack exactly, they present it as if it's an argument which somehow damages an atheistic world view but even if it was conceded that our morality is ultimately without any foundation it would prove nothing about the existence or non-existence of a God.
All these years later,knowing what we know now, every time Christopher coughs, my stomach clenches. How I wish this man was here today. He is so needed.
Never thought I would hear this from a Christian at 31:52: “Atheism is for the strong and intelligent. Christianity is for those that are not strong and not intelligent.” Yep. Nailed it. Think about this for a second…Hitchens wasn’t born with all that knowledge…he gained it by being a voracious reader…and he was doing that while these 4 weak and dumb men were in church listening to a revered with a high school education give the same ridiculous sermons. One chose knowledge, the others chose ignorance. So, it’s not that Christians are weak and unintelligent, it’s that they CHOOSE to be weak and unintelligent.
"The atheist has no basis for objecting to any kind of behaviour thoughout history." I have no basis? I don't want to be assaulted. I don't want to be murdered. I don't want to be oppressed. I recognize such things as unpleasant for myself. I have empathy, and I can easily extrapolate that what I find to be intolerable is also intolerable for others, and so I will not take any of those actions and I will condemn them when I see them.
It genuinely worries me when I hear grown men, educated and civilized men like those on the panel, (apart from Hitchens) speak like mad cultists. It's totally alien to me to hear people talking that way. If you put any of those guys on a street corner in a ragged robe, with long greasy hair, saying exactly the same words you'd cross the road to avoid them, or tell a policeman. They have no answer to Hitchens' arguments which clearly frustrates him because instead they offer nonsense. They are bad faith interlocutors.
Not going to count the moderator? The dude kept injecting his beliefs in so often I was starting to think he was one of the speakers instead of the moderator.
I read the Bible when I was 13 and I was excited. I felt I would become enlightened and that it would change my world. Instead, I was horrified and deeply disturbed by the intense cruelty sprinkled throughout its pages. I sobbed for hours and never picked it up again. I know that Love is the only thing that is real and eternal and the Christian God like his messengers use Love as an enticement, but nothing more which is why they allow slavery and genocide and the rampant abuse of children to bend to its very cruel will. I don't want to go to heaven. When I am in a state of love, I am already there.
He practiced a lot. Like any great orator, he honed his material over time. But it helps when you're twice as smart as anybody else in the room and all they can do is spout nonsense.
The preacher, if you didn’t know, meant that as an epistemic challenge. You’re straw manning him here for a giggle. Which I gotta say doesn’t live up to the standard Hitchens set in this and all his other debates.
love how the faithful NEVER mention this hitch-craig meeting. without the strict debate format to hide behind, just another christian, and with all the depth and glitter of a worn dime.
I think the Christians needed a few more to make this a fair debate. :-) Hitch has made sense of everything to me... Thank you so much Christopher. (This comment is for Hitch's friends and family).
I had to slow down the play speed in order to take in what Craig was saying. That dude spoke atrociously during that debate. Regardless of one's position on the topic, it is incomprehensible that anyone could ever take that man seriously. If you listen to what he says, each and every one of his arguments do not stand up to question whatsoever.
I lost the will to live Listening to theses apologists How can intelligent educated humans believe in such fiction Christopher hitchens wipes the floor with these guys
"I used to be an atheist, but then my wife turned into christinanity and i had to make a choice between staying an atheist, or getting laid on a regular basis." is all i heard from the first speaker >.
Bingo. Looks like he was literally cumming to god.
Hahaha hehehe I was going to right the same thing the power of the pussy lol
pussie whipped
😂 lol
So finely tuned to exist in one minuscule part of the universe which is like saying that you must give me my pension because I went to work for 1 femtosecond.
I can actually feel my IQ dropping as I tolerate (endure) the idiotic arguments of the pro religious. It's insane. Hitches is Magisterial as always.
l
Same. The obtuse density of the faithful is abhorrent
Got the Christmas thesaurus early? Nice!
@@thomasbonnett4800 no I actually just speak as though I’m educated lol
There are many intelligent theists. It's important to remember that even intelligent people believe things that aren't provably true.
I feel more love and respect for Hitchens, a man I never met, than I could ever be told to feel for any god.
They argue that Christianity offers hope, whereas (Hitchens) humanism does not. There is something worse than no hope . . . it's called false hope.
This is why Christopher is so missed. To have the balls to go in the ring with 4 theist plus 1 extra in guise of a moderator. To have the mental courage to do so. It’s says something about a person.
And mind you , it looks easy for the atheistic side cause Christopher makes it look easy.
You will be missed sir.
I wonder if he held to his atheism on his deathbed.
@@zZavies
Duh.
@@GuitarGuy057 idk about it.
@@zZavies Then you're abysmal at preponderance of evidence.
Which, if you're religious, tracks.
@@GuitarGuy057 atheism is still an ism
37:46 _"Imagine how she must have prayed everyday, how she must have beseeched heaven. Imagine for twenty four years and no, no answer at all, nothing! _*_Nothing!_* Goodness me what a moment. It's very satisfying to see a very unfiltered version of the anger he must feel towards religion.
As far as the bible goes...he had every right to do what he did to his daughter.
@@sciencefirst7032?
@@LMFAORomania women are treated as property especially daughters. Look them up...all old testament stuff. Like...selling them into slavery, killing them whenever you want...ect. It's all there.
MH Aurora I think it shows his anger at the lack of a god and anger at those who still follow that fantasy.
@@at6686 Could it be anger at those who presents the God delusion as something worthwhile to entertain?
On what sadistic grounds you have to stand to pretend that what that women went through can be compensated in any way. It's not like she was asked for that bargain.
Hitchens has the patience of Job, lol. Thank you sir for helping me on my journey of letting go of catholicism and instead embracing reality more authentically, and in fact more lovingly.
It was so brave of Hitchens to sit with these people, listen to their nonsense, compose himself and bring forward his message.
Hardly "brave" he probably looked upon this 'debate' as a piece of frivolous nonsense before lunch...🤣
Nah, they brought knives to a gun fight.
Wish someone would edit out all this skydaddy crap. But then again this piece will lose its masterful illustration of how man invented god.
@@weemaggiejiggs8832 Do you know what year this is from? Thank you
says who?
More like bringing forth reality.
Hitchens is the only intelligent person on that stage and the only one worthwhile listening to.
That statement is not true, not constructive and is in fact de-constructive. I'm not gonna argue about the speakers or the subject we probably agree on most things, but I don't agree on your attitude towards the 'other side in fact i vehemently disagree with any gratous demeaning comment against theists.
Why?
You are not doing any good to the furthering of atheism and more generally rational critical thinking.
Imagine being a theist reading that. And imagine you actually also made real pertinant points that had not been answered.
I can guarantee 99.99% of people will instantly dismiss all of your comment because it was felt as an unjustified (or plain) attack. It's dumb it's unrelated but people take critism of their beliefs as critisism of them and more so the stronger held.
You are basically attacking the most fundamental central pillar of a belief and that is equivalent to you giving them a get out of jail card.
You give them an espace route, oh that bastard is just a godless immoral atheist look at how he is full of hate on our poor religion, people hate christians so much we are constantly attacked- in the meantime not even having to dismiss your actual points, why give any time to the raving comments of a demonised adversary?
I understand where the sentiment comes from believe me, and i ve been far more brutal in many conversations with thiests. Not proud nor ashamed i'd be gzntler on some but not everyone deserveq your good will, and sometimes you just get angry no big deal, the difference is between attacking a person which is perfectly fine if merited, and attacking an ideology solely by mocking, which is actually helping said ideology by protecting it from critisism.
Again i understand and i m not saying you should never do it just to be clear.
Personally i find that it is sometimes the right thing to do in my moral code (utilitarian in moral philosophy terms) is attacking islam without any reason, not muslims but just bashing the religion a bit with true harsh arguments. Because i feel theu are wining the war against free speach and trying to ban critism, i will not let that happen
@@alexisjuillard4816 wow what a loser you are. You just typed an essay to yourself because trust me, no one gives a flying fluck what your opinion is. You must be really lonely to want to type for 10 minutes to yourself
He's also the only one being inconsistent with what he thinks, which expose's what he says is a lie.
@@kellygipson8354 you edited your comment that was 1 sentence long, barely. I’d advise you not to give your unsolicited opinion. Especially if it consists of a single sentence that you can’t get right the first time
what an absolute tautologist William Lane Craig is... how can someone with such little reasoning be respected
When word's are many, your just babbling
Plus he's just mealy mouthed... Always sounds like hi pitched wanking
He's just another con man
Easy. Have even less reasoning.
Why tf does his name have Dr. attached to it???? What a joke! What a slap in the face to ACTUAL Doctors!
Christopher Hitchens: answers all the questions with fine detail.
Dr.William Craig at the end: nOnE Of OUr qUesTiONs wERe aNsWERd.
First thing I thought when I heard that was... so William, you seem to have political aspirations.
I now have watched about three other debates involving WLC and he pretty much 'sums up' every other debate like this.
He always does that
From William Lane Craig
First of all I think that god is the best explanation for why anything exists rather than nothing
……fumbling with babble…....
and it seems to me that an argument along these lines is valid and cogent
(Here’s the actual point)
Whatever exists has an explanation of its existence, either in the necessity of its own nature or else in an external cause , if the universe has an explanation of its existence then that explanation is god and the universe obviously exists from that it follows that if the universe has an explanation of its existence then god exists , and since that first premise requires that I think that this is a good argument for gods existence , that one could defend in more detail.
(Possibly more detail is required)
(I am quite sure that I transcribed this accurately, I did leave out some uhms)
I’m going to try to summarise this in good faith
Actually I’ve just read it again and it doesn’t need summarising as it was quite short , it may have just seemed longer due to the mental gymnastics required to take the massive leap that he did
So I will rephrase
If something exists it has an explanation
The only explanation for the existence of the universe is god
And the universe obviously exists
Therefore god exists
It seems like I am twisting his words , his words were very twisted to begin with. (Reread/relisten to what he said , here is the massive leap that he made {if the universe has an explanation of its existence then that explanation is god}
I must stress again , see the curly brackets, he actually said that.)
If he didn’t speak so fast and the audience was less deferential and less polite he may have been laughed off stage for that
It would be a compliment to call that argument sophistry
Amazing that he claimed at the end that Christopher didn’t address the arguments and advised him to be better prepared
Five against one and Hitch still slaps each and every one. Reason above everything.
Hitchens himself disagrees. Please lay out how he slapped Brother Wilson! Thanks
exactly
What’s really scary and alarming is how one can’t see how Hitchens bitch slapped each opponent with pure reason and logic ... to understand how he did it you simply have to say to yourself “ can a spider man comic book actually prove the existence of spider man?” ... if you can’t understand this analogy then you’ve got a bigger problem than you think .. all religion and god(s) like comic books and super hero’s - are man made.
@@Fundaykidzz well said
It's a whole brainwashed school
"We have A lot of brain power up here" That moderator was very polite to those believers by not pointing out he was talking directly about Christopher
True
👍🤣😂😅🏆
If there are 5 billion brain cells between the debaters on the panel, how many does each debater have?
The desire for structure and purpose is so overwhelming for these theists that it is disturbing. What could be more narcissistic and arrogant than thinking one is a member of a chosen class of people, and that one knows the will of God? They are so afraid of freedom and liberty. So afraid to make a choice based on reason and logic. So afraid to live in a World without a totalitarian Father.
That makes absolutely no sense what you just said. “Based on reason and logic”? Where do you get off of telling someone what to do or to even call something logic when we’re just matter acting on time and space. That means there is no meaning or purpose or even thinking for that matter that should matter at all. We’re just stardust colliding with each other. Even atheist make me laugh because there logic is so flawed. A true atheist if one didn’t really believe in God wouldn’t be here commenting on UA-cam videos because there is not sense in actually commenting if where just time and space acting on matter. Even your thinking pattern of composing a sentence is illogical how can we show you’re right, how can we prove that logic even exist if we just evolved into what we are? Whose to say that is even true? Atheist sound like the far left who say men can be women and women can be men. It’s all ludicrous when you speak because there is not such thing as objective truth in an atheist world view. So why bother with literally anything. Why care about evil and good if there is no objective truth. And if we developed this objective truth how do we even know it’s right. I swear atheist stand on such High ground thinking they are superior in intellect when you’re own intellect you brag about isn’t even founded on nothing, its wrong or right but how would we know?
@@esdrassalgado8850 dude, the American Santa Claus isn't real. He's not a fat old white guy with a white beard and bald head. He never had a wife. There's no Easter bunny. There are no fairies. There is no God, gods, goddesses hanging around in the sky behind the clouds. Behind the clouds is outer space. There is nothing out there but the cosmos, and no, there are no spiritual realms out there. Stop fantasizing.
@@we8608 you’re the one who believes in fairytales thinking things can just pop into existence out of nothing. Let me guess you believe genies in lamps are real too huh? You’re the type of kid who thought money grew on trees growing up, Probably hecka privileged too. Pull your head out the clouds fam and think with your brain. Nothing has ever and will ever just pop into existence, especially something as complicated as a universe let alone life. People like you need to stop living in Lala land and come back down to reality.
@@esdrassalgado8850 I'm atheist.
@@esdrassalgado8850 your entire diatribe is pointless drivel. You not only lack any concept of logic, toy also have no concept of life. Do you need a pathetic sky dictator to have meaning in your life? I certainly don't. My life is full of meaning, no mind numbing, idiotic superstition required. Do some research on logic and reasoning before you attempt to speak to it, you've only shown how ignorant you are. And you're 100% correct, i, like many atheists do hold myself on higher ground intellectually. You cannot have true intelligence and believe any religious garbage at the same time
I went to a Conservative Christian Camp somewhere in southern Kansas back in June of 1993 when I was 12 years old. We had a counselor who was speaking to us children and teenagers who were 11-14 years old. This man in his 20s looked at every last one of us and said now you know we all to deserve to burn in hell for eternity and if it wasnt for Jesus we all would be. My heart I thought was going to jump right out of my throat and I was so enraged. My blood was boiling, my body shook violently, and I wanted to walk right up to that guy and kick him right in the balls. I dont see how anyone can live with themself or look someone in the face and say something so hideouly wickedly immoral to children, teenagers, or anyone for that matter. Oh, they would say were just teaching them that because it is only the truth. There is not even one shred of credible evidence to back up that claim. Thank You Christopher, you will be missed.
Maybe after your counselor said all those stupid remarks about how you are doomed to hell---he later said privately to each kid you can be redeemed if you make me happy as he put his hands in private places.
Mordecai Ruckman are you joking or are you just stupid? He didn’t want to kick the guy in the balls for not having evidence. He wanted to kick the guy in the balls for telling 11 - 14 year olds that that they would and do deserve to suffer for eternity except for the salvation of Jesus, for which there is no evidence.
You poor little baby .
Newsflash: most humans are totally delusional and insane.
@@dentonfender8872 Nowadays with less people in church there’s
child predators elsewhere. child indoctrination is like a mental molestation of young minds though.
Only 4 Christians? How unfair...
Lol. No doubt!
It should b reversed to make it a lil closer to fair
they could use 15; wouldn't make a fuck worth of difference
I know and none of them armed to spar with the late great Hitch 😢
Don't forget the moderator, who engaged with hitch at the beginning then ducked out when he realisef how putmatched he was, so 5 christians.
In Einstein words, if I were wrong 1 would have sufficed.
''horray for hitch'' he won't let you down..
The Fritzl argument just crushed the opposition. Hitchens showed real anger here and it made his argument ten times stronger.
Their floundering responses just showed how they couldn't comprehend the thought. Embarrassing
It's like an adult arguing with 4 children
“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence comes evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?" _Epicurus_
Not sure how Christopher Hitchens can keep a straight face and not start cracking up at the craziness spouted around him.
Maturity.
That has been my #1 question about God debaters for years. I wouldn't be able to stop laughing.
Because he takes these matters seriously and he is trying to make valid points, not just make fun of the subject at hand.
He said once
You have to have your heart on fire but your head on ice
I might’ve got those the wrong way around
He really does believe that religion poisons everything
Case and point the men on stage with him , it’s hard to say whether or not they are intelligent when they are so thoroughly indoctrinated, but imagine if they had never heard the good word of the lord , they would probably still have their morals and would probably spend their time more productively do more good and live more fulfilling lives
Hence religion poisons everything
It has probably been said before, but it is my personal belief that organised religion is the work of the devil
Craig gives a masterclass in lying. Wilson gives a masterclass in cognitive dissonance.
The worst of it is that he's actually smart enough to know that (and understand why) his sht stinks - pun intended - to high heaven.
Hitchens makes his arguments in such a way that its very hard not to take his side. Beautiful mind! Thanks for the wisdom.
Thank God for Christopher Hitchens!
Thank Christopher Hitchens mother for Christopher Hitchens!
hackum1 Thank "God", Indeed! I can only envision Christopher rolling his eyes at such a statement. We, Christopher and I, both perceive the graciousness of the sentiment, as well as the irony.
Thank god?
Amen!
Hahaha good one that was funny
Hitchens face at the beginning when the mod is talking about the subscription to the Christian magazine 😂😂😂
I gotta go back and look 😂
I can't tell you how nice it is for once to scroll through the "top comments" and see zero whiny and personally offended pissed off Christians acting exactly like someone their God wouldn't like.
It is much more pleasant to see all these 'whiny', 'pissed off', 'personally offended' "a-Theists"‽ Hmmm...
What does my God, your GOD, 'like'?
I listened more than once to understand what each was saying and found that Hitchens is mostly a lot of talk without much substance to the arguments that the other speakers brought up.
I notice on this post that most all posts are positive about Christopher. 😊
@@enriquefranco6330 on the contrary, I find very little substance in a deity who ignores his chosen creation for millennia, and then reveals itself only to a select few in a select location instead of to the entire world, without corroborative accounts in history and archeology. This is one of the most compelling arguments against monotheism I’ve ever heard, and I remember first hearing it from Christopher Hitchens. As for its rebuttal presented here, I would respond that there are far more practical written works for our present times than the Bible. The US Constitution comes to mind as one example.
@@enriquefranco6330its ALL substance. You're just not registering it because you don't want to have your entire life view shattered
@@enriquefranco6330 the arguments the others bring up have no substance. Their entire argument is either "you have to have faith", or "it says in the buy-bull ...". How rational.
"We have to be brothers, one with another", Hitchens
"Why?", Douglas
"We have to fight this off", Hitchens
"Why?", Douglas
"For our own survival. For our children's sake", Hitchens
The most interesting part of this debate was the part regarding the cosmological constants and the "fine tuning" of the universe and so on. This is an argument that falls on its own unreasonableness. The vast majority of the universe is fiercely inhospitable to life, or at least carbon-based life, due to radiation, temperature, gravity, and so forth, i.e. not fine-tuned by any means. And it is mind-boggling in the first place that people are surprised to find themselves on a planet that allows for life. Nobody will ever find themselves asking that question on a planet that does *not* allow for life. It is a self-fulfilling, circular, recursive argument which, of course, is and always will be the very trademark of unjustified and wishful thinking, more commonly known as religion.
Indeed. It's Douglas Adam's water puddle on cosmological scope.
And even most of our planet is unlivable because we can't breathe underwater.
Bravo! 👏👏👏
Exactly if it was that fined tuned by a celestial smart arse- he’d have bolted on a meteor deflector
We are fkd
Are you sure we aren't on a flat disc being held up by four elephants per Terry Pratchett?
This discussion is really hilarious, comical! I am not sure how Mr. Hitchens could keep his composure and not roll on the floor laughing. These guys in suits making these jokes with a straight face is really entertaining. They actually belive what they are saying :)
Who else fast forward to hear only the great Christopher Hitchens rhetoric? Christopher's patience dealing with these imbecilic deluded morons is amazing..May his mellifluous voice continue to enlighten the thinking man for thousands of years! Oh Yes!!
It wasn't at all 'brave' for Hitchens to attend this discussion. It was an opportunity for Hitch to educate, humiliate and honor them with his presence!!!
I swear Craig is such a douchebag with all his babble. 🤣🤣
No real challenge for Hitch, he out wits, and shines everytime!
I've yet to meet his genius equal. The greatest orator, wordsmith, and comedic delivery, I've ever witnessed.
I will forever listen to him, miss him, and so grateful for the best professor I've ever had!
Cheers to the late great Hitch!!!🍻🥂
10000% agree. I've watched this and other Hitchens debates multiple times. Read his books multiple times. He was a master that truly left this earth too soon. I wish more idiots, I mean religious people would hear him and break the disgusting cycle of hate, fear, self loathing, and violence caused by their beliefs in a celestial boogeyman
It's not bravery when you're the only heavyweight in the room, it's merely a workout.
Christopher hitchens was the bill Buckley of the left.
He didn't even need to crack a sweat. A lion against 5 mice.
The dude at the podium started this off with a near minute long commercial for their magazine subscriptions. That informed me of the caliber of the "thought leaders" on that stage sitting with Christopher.
By the end of this debate, Hitchens had these guys just bawling their eyes out.
There are times when you come across a person who was ahead of their time, this man's intellect was wasted on these people I believe his words if said today could change the world.
They were, they didn't. You can't dislodge ignorance.
If there ever was a man who was OF his time, that would be Christopher.
His words had a huge impact on the world. Thousands of people shook off the shackles of their religion thanks to him.
Christopher we have lost an amazing man!
Hitchens isn't just the smartest man in the room, he's got more braincells than every other man combined
Angry alcoholic who thought the war in Iraq was a roaring success till his dying day lest he admit to being wrong about something. In the words of his own brother, " Man is not great" Peter Hitchens.
@@XYisnotXX He objectively wasn't an alcoholic, his rationale for supporting the war in iraq was sound given his principles. and why would you listen to a word his brainwashed christian conservative brother has to say?
@@andrewz4105 The war in Iraq was an oil grab nothing more, the dogs in the street knew there were no naughty weapons of mass destruction. He was obliterated in debate by his own brother over the war and made to look like a fool! His alcoholism contributed greatly to his early demise along with his heavy smoking. Why should I listen to his superiors? Well unlike him there don't believe that magic interactions between random magic unguided chemicals acting apon more magic random unguided chemicals inside of magic matter (in this case his brain matter) creating such a miraculous effect as proper logical inference and truth for which there is absolutely no evidence of any description whatsoever. " Man is not great " Peter Hitchens.
Indeed, and what would that say about God who we supposedly were made in the image of... 🤔
This debate should be titled 4 retards vs. a real intellectual. It is shameful that in the 21st century people still believe this nonsense, and the 4 frauds and con men on stage are shameful ignoramuses whose whole purpose is to deliberately dupe and mislead indoctrinated and credulous people who have never been exposed to anything other than a dusty old 3,000 year old book that they have been told from the day they were born was the only thing they needed to know, and hitchens, one of the great truth bearers on this subject, went too soon.
Craig's strategy seems to be to overwhelm the opposition with so many logical fallacies that your brain just shuts down.
Skillfull psychobabble numbs the mind.
‘Incomprehensible religious waffle’ would be an appropriate description of which WLC appears to be most proficient !
No proof of supernatural power, thousands of gods created by humans in our short time on this planet, a panel of faith believers, and 1 genius. We miss you Christopher.
never...never will we come even close to seeing the likes of our precious hitch
Craig’s arguments and reasoning are nonsense
Love watching this. This is before Hitch got sick. Hitch kicked ass in this debate.
Love ?
@@matimus100 Look it up. You are already on the internet!
Hitchens has more ethics; more conviction; more sense ; and more intellectual courage then anyone in this room
Careful now. He's not all that infallible. No human being is. I know I ain't.
49:39 The orangutan comparison was perfect, as if he needed a celestial dictator to care for his own children 🤷🏾♂️😂🦧
I absolutely LOVE Christopher.
Amazing man.
“We’re gonna need more apologists.”
And more of these "moderators".
@@Ometecuhtli "And more magazine subscriptions."
When Sam Harris accused Christians of playing tennis without the net, this is what he was talking about. On the one hand they say the father raped his daughter in a dungeon because God gave him free will and it would be a slippery slope to intervene. Then later when Christopher said he was hardwired to love his daughter they said it's because God hardwired/programmed him that way. It's hard to think on your feet when it's 1 vs 5 but I wish he would have pointed out that if God hardwired him to love his daughter then he also hard wired the man to rape and torture his daughter.
Now I've seen many Hitchens's debates and I think it's impossible to beat him in a discussion. Never seen it happen and can't imagine what it would look like.
Tunnel vision?
see George Galloway
@@patrickkelly7085 Hitchens won that one too. By far.
Look up his debate with lennox. He conceded I think
@@germansambucety9793 lennox debated in front of his congregation and Hitchens conceded based on the religious audience applause
Craig makes these enormous leaps of logic, 'this therefore, that' and by the time he inhales he's lost me.
He's lost you because what he's saying is the most ill-formed logical presentation In the world. No unbiased philosopher or scientist would take it seriously.
"The universe must have had a cause therefore God loves us" it's ridiculous. I'm not sure he doesn't have learning difficulties.
The problem isn't your ability to follow his arguments, the problem is his inability to make an argument that logically follows.
Just hit me to. So sad, and yet he stays resolute in his integrity and detailed discussion. He was such a sharp mind.
Hitchens on the top of his game here. Dude is killing it! Love it when anybody makes Lane Craig look like an idiot.
Craig doesn't need any help with that. It happens as soon as he opens his mouth. "If it's even POSSIBLE that there is a universe where Santa Claus exists, it therefore proves that Santa Claus exists!" Better make sure I'm on the nice list!!!
Craig makes it too easy
From about 35 minutes in until Hitchens stops speaking proves to me that he was a masterful rhetorician. Sometimes I imagine his monologues in another accent and, though they lose a little something, they are still powerful and moving.
Fuck cancer.
That cough attack close to the 1 hour mark in the video....Damit :/
I know :( you can notice it in many of his debates circa 09'/10'. so sad.
I would not want to be sitting in that seat at the time. By which I means the 4 fellers sitting next to Hitch.
I love Hitch but can't listen to this garbage. He is genius, but these others.....ugh.....
TheBillP76 thankfully you don’t have to, because Hitchens suffered in our place. Haha.
TheBillP76 5 to 1 wasn’t a fair fight. They needed at least 20 to start getting close.
Most of what I'm listening to is incoherent babbling. I suffer through the Christian comments to hear the Hitchslap.
Sad to hear Christopher coughing. I miss him everyday.
There's something I've never understood about how Christopher responded to the moral question, why doesn't he just concede that morality is subjective and part of an evolutionary process. It wouldn't put him on the back foot because surely the point is that modern imperfect humanism is inherently still better than the imaginary objectivity of bronze age religious doctrine, they always seem to work him into a corner with that one.
+Maestro Gee yeah I've wondered something similar, I feel like you could say even less than "subjective part of an evolutionary process". They act like it's a cornering question, but knowing where our morality comes from doesn't seem like an important question.
contactkeithstack exactly, they present it as if it's an argument which somehow damages an atheistic world view but even if it was conceded that our morality is ultimately without any foundation it would prove nothing about the existence or non-existence of a God.
Maestro Gee yeah or the existence of the behavior we call moral.
All these years later,knowing what we know now, every time Christopher coughs, my stomach clenches. How I wish this man was here today. He is so needed.
"The Christians outnumber us four-to-one. Good odds, for any atheist." - Hitch / Leonidas
This whole thing is 5 against 1 and yet Hitchens is the only one to demonstrate morality.
Look at William Craig Lane at 3:45... his face shows that he really thinks the whole crowd is applauding him 😆
Never thought I would hear this from a Christian at 31:52: “Atheism is for the strong and intelligent. Christianity is for those that are not strong and not intelligent.” Yep. Nailed it. Think about this for a second…Hitchens wasn’t born with all that knowledge…he gained it by being a voracious reader…and he was doing that while these 4 weak and dumb men were in church listening to a revered with a high school education give the same ridiculous sermons. One chose knowledge, the others chose ignorance. So, it’s not that Christians are weak and unintelligent, it’s that they CHOOSE to be weak and unintelligent.
That man near the start talking about soda fizzing up has completely lost his marbles
😂
Craig truly is a proper fool.
Hitchens was not unlike a US F-22; he took out four opponents that never saw him coming.
Love this :-)
"The atheist has no basis for objecting to any kind of behaviour thoughout history." I have no basis? I don't want to be assaulted. I don't want to be murdered. I don't want to be oppressed. I recognize such things as unpleasant for myself. I have empathy, and I can easily extrapolate that what I find to be intolerable is also intolerable for others, and so I will not take any of those actions and I will condemn them when I see them.
If Jesus died for your sins why are you still born in sin?
They should do one about Santa Claus too
Hitchslapped !! All of them
It genuinely worries me when I hear grown men, educated and civilized men like those on the panel, (apart from Hitchens) speak like mad cultists. It's totally alien to me to hear people talking that way. If you put any of those guys on a street corner in a ragged robe, with long greasy hair, saying exactly the same words you'd cross the road to avoid them, or tell a policeman. They have no answer to Hitchens' arguments which clearly frustrates him because instead they offer nonsense. They are bad faith interlocutors.
Another astounding argument for Christianity: it gives hope to the feeble and stupid.
My head hurts.
And money to those who can't have a proper job.
It is so painful to listen to Lane Craig
Especially that closing statement, when he was so condescending and dismissive of Hitchens.
Whenever WLC says "intellectual" I have an uncontrollable urge to plant my face into my palm.
Not going to count the moderator? The dude kept injecting his beliefs in so often I was starting to think he was one of the speakers instead of the moderator.
I read the Bible when I was 13 and I was excited. I felt I would become enlightened and that it would change my world. Instead, I was horrified and deeply disturbed by the intense cruelty sprinkled throughout its pages. I sobbed for hours and never picked it up again. I know that Love is the only thing that is real and eternal and the Christian God like his messengers use Love as an enticement, but nothing more which is why they allow slavery and genocide and the rampant abuse of children to bend to its very cruel will. I don't want to go to heaven. When I am in a state of love, I am already there.
That’s horrible, I’m sorry to hear that. Have you ever checked out Frank Turek or William Lane Craig?
@@strykerhero994 I have been around enough Christians to know they are the biggest hypocrites on the planet.
Hitchens is brilliant.
Hitch was so natural. All that information at his fingers and put so eloquently.
Beautiful Hitch. RIP, we will take it from here sir
He practiced a lot. Like any great orator, he honed his material over time. But it helps when you're twice as smart as anybody else in the room and all they can do is spout nonsense.
Please don't be dead Christopher.
Only 4+ the moderator?? I miss Christopher Hitchens a lot.
07:53 Hitch's reaction is priceless.
Religious people have no shame in admitting that they would believe absolutely anything in the absence of evidence.
4 vs hitch - and they're still outnumbered.
Miss You Christopher
Hitchens "we should outlearn racism"
Priest "why?"
The preacher, if you didn’t know, meant that as an epistemic challenge. You’re straw manning him here for a giggle. Which I gotta say doesn’t live up to the standard Hitchens set in this and all his other debates.
@@dingdongism Christ! Relax Doug 🙄. We both know Hitch would've given the comment a 👍🏿.
One sharpened kitchen knife in a drawer full of rusty spoons
👍🤣😂😅
where did he get the strength !
You mean hitchen knife...
"Man is not great" Peter Hitchens
@@XYisnotXXmaybe not, but at least he exists
0:09:10 CH
0:15:35
0:20:21
0:24:47
0:30:09
0:33:33 CH
...
1:52:23 CH
1:55:35
Nice work 👌
This is hard to watch, people so far gone and brainwashed. I feel sorry for them. Thank you Christopher.
Hitchens was outstanding ,especially with essentially 5 to 1.After listening to this debate it reaffirms my atheism!
Amazing! Where for goodness sake was I when this video has been uploaded? I love Hitch.
love how the faithful NEVER mention this hitch-craig meeting.
without the strict debate format to hide behind, just another christian, and with all the depth and glitter of a worn dime.
I think the Christians needed a few more to make this a fair debate. :-) Hitch has made sense of everything to me... Thank you so much Christopher. (This comment is for Hitch's friends and family).
This debate could only be improved by the addition of shrooms
Not fair 1 against 4!!!! They need about 20 more to even have a chance against Hitch!!!
I had to slow down the play speed in order to take in what Craig was saying. That dude spoke atrociously during that debate. Regardless of one's position on the topic, it is incomprehensible that anyone could ever take that man seriously.
If you listen to what he says, each and every one of his arguments do not stand up to question whatsoever.
I lost the will to live
Listening to theses apologists
How can intelligent educated humans believe in such fiction
Christopher hitchens wipes the floor with these guys
Knowing what we know now, it's painful to see Hitchens coughing.
The difference between christopher and the rest is hes being honest. Not only with himself but with the audience as well.
At 1:40:34, Hitch says that he "fails completely to see the force of this argument."
Is that him being honest with himself or the audience?
Hitchens is my god and you cant prove me wrong
Like the movie Jaws. Instead of a bigger boat.
To take down Hitchens, your gonna need more Christians.
Epic debate. Hitch is fearless. Thanks for posting.