This is exactly how you modernize the Enterprise. While not a complete redesign, there's more than enough still in tact that you know it's the USS Enterprise. Plus, I love how it even incorporates design elements from the NX-01 in the nacelles. They simply reworked the Enterprise so it better fits in to the design continuity of its predecessor as well as giving you an indication of where it's headed when it is refit years later. This is, without question, one of my favorite Enterprise designs. She's just gorgeous.
I like the notion that the original TOS look might just be an aesthetic choice, in-universe. This is what a Constitution class should _normally_ look like, but Kirk is a known lover of the past (case in point, he's an Abe Lincoln fanboy, well-versed in western & U.S. cultural lore, familiar enough with most time periods that he can near-seamlessly blend into almost any culture-of-the-day that's even remotely similar, and his friends think he'd prefer a pair of old-fashioned glasses to whatever futuristic treatments were available). So, it honestly wouldn't be all that surprising if he requested that the Enterprise be given an old-timey aesthetic when it was being refitted between Pike's command and his, and people liked it enough that the style caught on. (Or, conversely, that Starfleet was just going through an "art deco" phase in general, and they redid their ships with a 70's-raygun-future finish as part of a cultural renaissance.)
@@FomorViceroy I agree, even the texture and the torpedo launch tubes look like the ones from ENT. it's like they filled the details that the original enterprise was missing with stuff from ENT and it all makes sense. If you really want to do a prequel design, and I really hope they stop making prequels, that's how you do it
@@Anbello2 I think the nacelle pylons look great on the SNW Enterprise. They look a lot sturdier than the ones on TOS Enterprise, and like the similar style pylons on the refit Enterprise, and Enterprise A, make the ship look sleeker, and faster. One thing is for sure the SNW ship designers did a much better job of capturing the look, and feel of TOS Enterprise, while giving it a more modern look, than the JJ Abrams did with their Enterprise, which I personally think looks awkward, and veers to much from the design elements of TOS Enterprise.
@@HobbiesRfunreally? I thought the jj enterprise looked amazing. Although they really had no idea what to do about scaling. 1 shot its the size it should be. The next its the largest ship (outside the vengeance) starfleet has ever made. Like pick a scale and keep it that way.
@@HobbiesRfun Pylons make sense because why would Starfleet go from back swept ones from 2150's into straight in 2250's and back to swept ones in 2270's.
@@HobbiesRfun Personally as both a die hard fan of star trek for over 50 years, and as someone with an art background, I found the JJ Prise to be ungainly, just visually offensive. Nacelles are too big, overdone curved hull sections. The Enterprise from Strange new worlds is a visual work of art, which combines what I think is beauty and function. (I wonder what Matt Jeffries could have done if he had the technology of even the 1990's. His design was limited to the construction tech of his day, and the level of special effects in the mid 1960's.)
I love the detail every time the enterprise flies through an astroid field or debris field, you see the little sparkles of debris off the shields on the front of the ship. The SNW enterprise did a great job of modernizing and respecting the clean model of the original series without getting carried away like the abrams films.
But they got carried away by making it almost twice the size and that big huge rollercoaster turbolift interior that makes ZERO sense. As well as Pikes Ten Forward sized quarters and everyone else. The aesthetics were fine it's the size that is AWFUL.....
It holds faith to the TOS model while taking advantage of over five decades of advancement in production values, helps make the TOS movie refit _make sense_ , and doesn't get way too overstylized like the JJ Trek Enterprise. I am A-OK retconning the original TOS Enterprise to look like this in any new media here on out.
@@Anth230 On the site where you can see deck plans for many Star Trek ships, a few people actually figured out that the known size is actually too small given the size of the set corridors which were 10 ft high. So in scaling the ship size taking in account for the corridor heights, the Enterprise is much bigger than we thought. Plus the fact that this is a series shot today, wherein the TOS was in the 60's. SNW is in keeping with the tech of today and with the ship sizes of Discovery so it makes sense in that aspect too.
@@Madcat221 I said the update in aesthetics were fine. What I have a problem with is the ship is not twice as big as the original and has a turbolift interior larger than the ship itself. Which makes absolutely ZERO sense.
@@franko8814 No no. There is no way the ship is twice as large as we see here. There is no getting around that fact. Also the ridiculous turbolift interiors we saw in discovery and then in the SNW short Trek is completely stupid and makes zero sense and no one can reconcile it. They can try but it will never make sense...
One thing SNW really respects and portrays visually is the structure of massive ships. It's very clear when we see ships damaged or destroyed. The Farragut being splashed is an amazing shot because it gets away from the "explosion of sparkles" cliche so common in pop science fiction - something popularized by Star Trek itself due to the limitations of special effects work with physical models. In SNW the Farragut being ripped open is dominated by a massive outpouring of gas that instantly begins to freeze into grey clouds, and a huge shower of structural debris that simultaneously explodes outward while still overall traveling within the frame of reference of ship was headed in.
One good thing. Love the subtle way the impulse kicks in at 00:27. I do wish they'd stop with the starships in atmo. It's a star ship, not an air ship, not a dirigible. Also the fighter plane characteristics they give the Enterprise, really not appealing. Some of the maneuvers are spot on, slow graceful rolls and pitches, but the twerking and jerking crap, that detracts from the magnificence of the ship. Tight turns and twists are best left to shuttlecraft.
I get hung up on the rebooted visuals/tech being heedlessly retooled, but I must admit they have some beautiful and quite grounded ship shots in this show.
I purchased the original series in the remastered version. I also have a soft spot for physical models, as I am a model builder.) What I like about the remastered version is also the different angles we can see now they didn't have to hide the port side of the ship, due to the large mounting arm, and electrical cables going into the secondary hull.
@@ThatBonsaipanda Strange New Worlds space scenes are pretty much a masterclass in finding a balance between realistic lighting in space and exaggerating sufficiently to be able to show off the ships. The staging of the lighting is particularly well done.
Well, you know, as beautiful as the original enterprise is, they tried hard to give an old design a modern look. In my opinion they succeeded. Or at least, it's definitely better than the jj Abraham's disaster. (sorry if i misspelled anything, I'm not English 😅)
I think it is light grey. It's easier to notice when reflected by incident light at 2:38. You just don't normally notice the color because the ship is more realistically lit.
She,s our last hope...herr majesty the enterprise👑🤍The look&design of this enterprise is just like the 60,s show I wish she was in lightgrey color jumping into warp is very awesome
While I'm not completely sold on the squatter design (the nacelle angles just bug me), this is an absolutely beautiful version of the original Enterprise. I also love that, for once, we can see just how maneuverable a Connie can be and that "evasive maneuvers" actually do something.
They kinda realised after the fact that even as far back as _TOS_ , the combination of warp drive, being able to accelerate to a significant portion of light speed in an extremely short time (impulse engines), and never tearing herself apart from centrifugal forces or turning the crew into a fine paste on the back wall whenever she moved meant the Enterprise would've actually been _extremely_ nimble when her captain wanted her to be. A good deal of later series' technobabble (e.g., anything mentioning inertial dampeners or structural integrity fields, or the fun little tidbit that "full impulse" is just the fastest they can go on impulse power without relativity being a nightmare) and established speeds (e.g., Voyager's impulse engines typically "topping out" at about a quarter of the speed of light because of the relativity thing, and _ST:TMP_ Enterprise hitting 1/3 light speed at full impulse, implying that pre-movie Enterprise's impulse drive probably maxes out somewhere around 0.3c) are essentially just them acknowledging the logical implications of what we see the Enterprise do.
Great looking ship, just wish she wasn't perpetually bathed in shadow so we could see the damned thing. Even when she's directly under the sun the camera is always on the dark side of the ship. 0.o
My biggest complaint is the series writers do not portray the Enterprise as a formidable fighting ship. They even made the Enterprise weak in their remake of the "Balance of power" where the original series Enterprise demonstrated its prowness. The SNW crew also created a version of the Gorn that is way too hard to image could be a space fairing species . However, stories like "Ad Astra per Aspera" and "Children of the Comet" redeem a lot of the series negatives.
I think there's an overall difference in philosophy between the two shows on a few points. The original Star Trek, frankly, was built around rather jocular gunboat diplomacy. "We come in peace, shoot to kill". The Enterprise was as powerful as Kirk needed an inflection point in a given episode. And Kirk inflected... a lot. Strange New Worlds is emphasizing Starfleet as a defensive support and exploration fleet. Advanced technology and science are on display but it really reinforces it being dedicated to exploration and experimentation. Of course, one could also wave this away due to Pike's Enterprise being the initial deployment of the Constitution. There is a major refit between here and the film era Constitution and one might imagine Starfleet gives in to growing threats and increases fighting capability with every refit.
I know this is controversial, but I never really liked the TOS Enterprise. I get that it was revolutionary at the time, but the model has not aged well. The textures make it look like a cheap toy. And not just any cheap toy, but a knock-off you find at Dollar General. This one though? I get it. SNW's Ent is gorgeous. It takes everything that was good about the original design, and makes it work today. It's the design finally living up to it's potential. She's a beautiful ship that does justice to her design.
According to Memory Alpha, the ship had straight pylons from the get-go. Designers John Eaves and Scott Schneider had never considered the swept-back design, because "we felt it would be jumping forward in time." It was the Pixomondo modelers who implemented the last-minute changes that eventually resulted in the onscreen version as ultimately featured in the series, such as the swept-back nacelle pylon configuration, the lengthened nacelles, the thickened neck and pylons, and other dimensional and proportional changes in order to meet Deverell's above-mentioned requirement to "cheat it as a larger ship". It was only two weeks before the redesign was slated to make its first onscreen appearance that Eaves and Schneider - who had no further design input while the model was being prepared at Pixomondo - were acquainted with the final version. Ironically, the swept-back nacelle pylon configuration was something Matt Jefferies,the Godfather of Star Trek Starship design, had already conceived back in 1964 as a fallback option had the then-producers not liked the configuration as ultimately employed in Star Trek: The Original Series, but which was adopted for his later 1977 Constitution II-class model (co-)redesign. memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Constitution_class_model_(retcon)#Design
I like the retro look of this ship a lot. I never liked the look of the movie reboot Enterprise. However, it's not the Millennium Falcon. An asteroid chase? Really?
What the reboot does better though is show the size of enterprise through motion. I love SNW but the ship maneuvers much too quickly and feels like it’s tiny to what it really is. The reboots give it that massive, hard to fly feel.
So if this is supposed to be the Enterprise Kirk inherits, why are the pylons that carry the engines so different? It looks almost like a refit from one of the movies after the original series. Why can't they be content to duplicate the original considering this is supposed to be the original ship?
They probably follow the original concept of the Ship back in TOS time, in the idea where they put the Swept back Pylons instead of the Straight one (Which got implied later on)
I think if special effects artists have a scale of power demonstration of the starships...i.e. show what an average starship phaser shot can do to materials we know in THIS century , that could make what a starship can do ,more believable...You take a starship dodging and darting through enemy fire. The fact that the starship is so BIG, and it manuvers so quickly, AND artificial gravity holds everyone to the deck, AND the shields are glowing brightly repelling enemy fire. It's hard to believe that a powerplant that fits in the ship ,has that much power. ....SO...I propose...in the future... When a warpcore explodes.. it should look like a super nova per say like it would fuck up a planet, if it were in close orbit. Or show a phaser shot slice through hoover damn, like a hot knife through butter. Or when a starship LANDS on a planet, it should have a deafening thumbing sound of some sort. Like shatter windows in sky scrapers.. a photon torpedo should be able to turn half of Manhatten island into a burnt out creator 3/4 of a mile deep. Nothing standing. Not even randome girders from buildings. Just dust. Completely vaporized. I think then ...the multiple simultaneous expenditures of energy would be more believable in the space battles. Stay consistent with what kind of power each weapon HAS, the shields, so on.... Hope I helped something❤❤❤❤❤
Well, on the topic of matter-antimatter weapons, wikipedia states "The paramount advantage of such a theoretical weapon is that antimatter and matter collisions result in the entire sum of their mass energy equivalent being released as energy, which is at least two orders of magnitude greater than the energy release of the most efficient fusion weapons (100% vs 0.4-1%)" so yeah, they should fuck up a planet but I'm glad star trek has moved on from blowing planets up lol
I genuinely don't mind updated looks or consoles etc for Star Trek, as long as the spirit of it is there. Unfortunately I don't really consider anything made from discovery onwards Star Trek as it has no spirit. I gave strange new worlds a chance but no, the characters don't do it for me.
I hate the hyper-detailed grey Enterprise. Ship is a beauty in luminescent white. The trend is a little too "gunked-up" lately. Needs the simplification of clean lines.
The original Enterprise was simple, clear to read and faithful in its balance. The early design reflected that with flat and pearly monochrome colors. Its almost as if these designers don't understand that the Enterprise isn't supposed to look "real"
I don't know how they can make the ships look as ugly as they have been for the past 15 years, I mean do they have meetings about, 'you special effects lackey, make ugly ships go pew-pew".... sheesh! :(
@UmboCosiQualityGaming Can I integrate some parts of your amazing video to my music videos like "Progessive House - Melodic Techno" or other music videos ?
Ugly and weird looking flat different colored gray plating . One can do much better. They should take the models as reference and make that look work and then improve on details. It should say massive and weight.
I love this version of the Enterprise, BUT I want to see it actual 2024 graphics. The way they chose to make it look like it came from the 2nd generation Xbox irritates the living daylights out of me!
Why the need to ruin the original design of the ship? And the shitty grey color? These are decisions made by people who are not Star Trek fans. Dear woke hollywood.. Not everything needs your "special touch" or new creative spin... You don't improve on perfection...
Don't like this cgi thing, also the sound it is making fits not for me. And why is it moving so fast around up and down. A starship is a heavy cruiser and should move slow - except the defiant. I don't like New Trek because it has nothing to do with the star trek I grew up with.
@@luizeduardoortizduarte4380You can't really argue for change when you go back to TOS. If Star Trek must change, then it needs to move on from Kirk, Spock and the original 1701. Change would be focusing on the universe after Voyager, and not making a reboot of TOS and claiming its in the same universe
@@homeworld1765 i mean in technology, style and production value , I don't like nostalgia either, let TOS rest. But if you are going to revist it, the ship will move ike that cuz it can, wich wasnt possible in the 60s, i just dont think the hate on the series being on stuff like the ship sets and the production value.
Its really amazing how great "star Trek Continues" was on a shoestring budget from people who loved the original series compared to the CGI Woke dumpster fire that is SNW.
This is exactly how you modernize the Enterprise. While not a complete redesign, there's more than enough still in tact that you know it's the USS Enterprise. Plus, I love how it even incorporates design elements from the NX-01 in the nacelles. They simply reworked the Enterprise so it better fits in to the design continuity of its predecessor as well as giving you an indication of where it's headed when it is refit years later. This is, without question, one of my favorite Enterprise designs. She's just gorgeous.
You do know Picard season 3 has a TOS Connie in the museum.
I like the notion that the original TOS look might just be an aesthetic choice, in-universe. This is what a Constitution class should _normally_ look like, but Kirk is a known lover of the past (case in point, he's an Abe Lincoln fanboy, well-versed in western & U.S. cultural lore, familiar enough with most time periods that he can near-seamlessly blend into almost any culture-of-the-day that's even remotely similar, and his friends think he'd prefer a pair of old-fashioned glasses to whatever futuristic treatments were available). So, it honestly wouldn't be all that surprising if he requested that the Enterprise be given an old-timey aesthetic when it was being refitted between Pike's command and his, and people liked it enough that the style caught on. (Or, conversely, that Starfleet was just going through an "art deco" phase in general, and they redid their ships with a 70's-raygun-future finish as part of a cultural renaissance.)
Oh yeah. Pike’s Enterprise has become my personal favorite design, just ahead of (funnily enough) Archer’s NX-01. That design is seriously underrated.
@@FomorViceroy I agree, even the texture and the torpedo launch tubes look like the ones from ENT. it's like they filled the details that the original enterprise was missing with stuff from ENT and it all makes sense. If you really want to do a prequel design, and I really hope they stop making prequels, that's how you do it
personally think this is the perfect version of enterprise (constitution version at least, i prefer sovereign class)
Same. Although the nacelle pylons look weird
@@Anbello2 I think the nacelle pylons look great on the SNW Enterprise. They look a lot sturdier than the ones on TOS Enterprise, and like the similar style pylons on the refit Enterprise, and Enterprise A, make the ship look sleeker, and faster.
One thing is for sure the SNW ship designers did a much better job of capturing the look, and feel of TOS Enterprise, while giving it a more modern look, than the JJ Abrams did with their Enterprise, which I personally think looks awkward, and veers to much from the design elements of TOS Enterprise.
@@HobbiesRfunreally? I thought the jj enterprise looked amazing. Although they really had no idea what to do about scaling. 1 shot its the size it should be. The next its the largest ship (outside the vengeance) starfleet has ever made. Like pick a scale and keep it that way.
@@HobbiesRfun Pylons make sense because why would Starfleet go from back swept ones from 2150's into straight in 2250's and back to swept ones in 2270's.
@@HobbiesRfun
Personally as both a die hard fan of star trek for over 50 years, and as someone with an art background, I found the JJ Prise to be ungainly, just visually offensive. Nacelles are too big, overdone curved hull sections.
The Enterprise from Strange new worlds is a visual work of art, which combines what I think is beauty and function.
(I wonder what Matt Jeffries could have done if he had the technology of even the 1990's. His design was limited to the construction tech of his day, and the level of special effects in the mid 1960's.)
I love the detail every time the enterprise flies through an astroid field or debris field, you see the little sparkles of debris off the shields on the front of the ship. The SNW enterprise did a great job of modernizing and respecting the clean model of the original series without getting carried away like the abrams films.
But they got carried away by making it almost twice the size and that big huge rollercoaster turbolift interior that makes ZERO sense. As well as Pikes Ten Forward sized quarters and everyone else. The aesthetics were fine it's the size that is AWFUL.....
It holds faith to the TOS model while taking advantage of over five decades of advancement in production values, helps make the TOS movie refit _make sense_ , and doesn't get way too overstylized like the JJ Trek Enterprise. I am A-OK retconning the original TOS Enterprise to look like this in any new media here on out.
@@Anth230 On the site where you can see deck plans for many Star Trek ships, a few people actually figured out that the known size is actually too small given the size of the set corridors which were 10 ft high. So in scaling the ship size taking in account for the corridor heights, the Enterprise is much bigger than we thought. Plus the fact that this is a series shot today, wherein the TOS was in the 60's. SNW is in keeping with the tech of today and with the ship sizes of Discovery so it makes sense in that aspect too.
@@Madcat221 I said the update in aesthetics were fine. What I have a problem with is the ship is not twice as big as the original and has a turbolift interior larger than the ship itself. Which makes absolutely ZERO sense.
@@franko8814 No no. There is no way the ship is twice as large as we see here. There is no getting around that fact. Also the ridiculous turbolift interiors we saw in discovery and then in the SNW short Trek is completely stupid and makes zero sense and no one can reconcile it. They can try but it will never make sense...
One thing SNW really respects and portrays visually is the structure of massive ships. It's very clear when we see ships damaged or destroyed. The Farragut being splashed is an amazing shot because it gets away from the "explosion of sparkles" cliche so common in pop science fiction - something popularized by Star Trek itself due to the limitations of special effects work with physical models.
In SNW the Farragut being ripped open is dominated by a massive outpouring of gas that instantly begins to freeze into grey clouds, and a huge shower of structural debris that simultaneously explodes outward while still overall traveling within the frame of reference of ship was headed in.
Thank you so much for compiling these shots !! ^^
One good thing. Love the subtle way the impulse kicks in at 00:27.
I do wish they'd stop with the starships in atmo. It's a star ship, not an air ship, not a dirigible.
Also the fighter plane characteristics they give the Enterprise, really not appealing. Some of the maneuvers are spot on, slow graceful rolls and pitches, but the twerking and jerking crap, that detracts from the magnificence of the ship.
Tight turns and twists are best left to shuttlecraft.
The Enterprise has been in atmo before, way back when TOS was first aired.
@@filthycasual8187 In the episode in TOS they weren't zipping around or idly cruising about, and they were at a very high orbit, temporarily stranded.
@@filthycasual8187 Yeah, and they were freaking out about it because the ship wasn't designed to fly in atmo.
I get hung up on the rebooted visuals/tech being heedlessly retooled, but I must admit they have some beautiful and quite grounded ship shots in this show.
Hard for me to get as worked up about CGI models as I do the physical models. But they do do some nice shots.
I purchased the original series in the remastered version. I also have a soft spot for physical models, as I am a model builder.)
What I like about the remastered version is also the different angles we can see now they didn't have to hide the port side of the ship, due to the large mounting arm, and electrical cables going into the secondary hull.
This could be rendered exactly like the physical models, I have no idea why the CGI in the new Trek is so overdone, murky and cartoonish.
@@ThatBonsaipanda Strange New Worlds space scenes are pretty much a masterclass in finding a balance between realistic lighting in space and exaggerating sufficiently to be able to show off the ships. The staging of the lighting is particularly well done.
I didn't like this when i first saw it but its really grown on me. Could have made it white though.
Well, you know, as beautiful as the original enterprise is, they tried hard to give an old design a modern look. In my opinion they succeeded. Or at least, it's definitely better than the jj Abraham's disaster. (sorry if i misspelled anything, I'm not English 😅)
@lucarinaldichini324 I am English. But I can barely spell unfortunately.
@@timrobinson513 c'mon mate, don't underestimate yourself, you're doing great! ✌️😁
Paint the dang thing light gray!! The dirty metal texture just sucks up light and makes it hard to see detail
Yea they were trying to link it to the NX class. I'm hoping they'll paint it on future seasons?
I think it is light grey. It's easier to notice when reflected by incident light at 2:38. You just don't normally notice the color because the ship is more realistically lit.
I like the dirty metal look the ole girl looks more "she means Business"aesthetic
When I build mine, I will use Royal Light Grey, just like I did for the TOS Enterprise.
It does look a bit too grungy steampunk for my tastes.
"She's a beauty!"
---- Lt.Detmer
She,s our last hope...herr majesty the enterprise👑🤍The look&design of this enterprise is just like the 60,s show I wish she was in lightgrey color jumping into warp is very awesome
While I'm not completely sold on the squatter design (the nacelle angles just bug me), this is an absolutely beautiful version of the original Enterprise. I also love that, for once, we can see just how maneuverable a Connie can be and that "evasive maneuvers" actually do something.
@@ReturnofBenjamin I agree, it's much better than the kelvin Enterprise and keeping the old design would have been too lazy
Beautiful ship
The shuttle is named stamets
discovery refernce?
damn.....never expected to see that the enterprise....was that nimble on flight when things goes wrong
Actually the original 1701 was very maneuverable in the show just at warp speed this more realistic
They kinda realised after the fact that even as far back as _TOS_ , the combination of warp drive, being able to accelerate to a significant portion of light speed in an extremely short time (impulse engines), and never tearing herself apart from centrifugal forces or turning the crew into a fine paste on the back wall whenever she moved meant the Enterprise would've actually been _extremely_ nimble when her captain wanted her to be. A good deal of later series' technobabble (e.g., anything mentioning inertial dampeners or structural integrity fields, or the fun little tidbit that "full impulse" is just the fastest they can go on impulse power without relativity being a nightmare) and established speeds (e.g., Voyager's impulse engines typically "topping out" at about a quarter of the speed of light because of the relativity thing, and _ST:TMP_ Enterprise hitting 1/3 light speed at full impulse, implying that pre-movie Enterprise's impulse drive probably maxes out somewhere around 0.3c) are essentially just them acknowledging the logical implications of what we see the Enterprise do.
Great looking ship, just wish she wasn't perpetually bathed in shadow so we could see the damned thing.
Even when she's directly under the sun the camera is always on the dark side of the ship. 0.o
And dark side of the moon was a great record lmao
My biggest complaint is the series writers do not portray the Enterprise as a formidable fighting ship. They even made the Enterprise weak in their remake of the "Balance of power" where the original series Enterprise demonstrated its prowness. The SNW crew also created a version of the Gorn that is way too hard to image could be a space fairing species . However, stories like "Ad Astra per Aspera" and "Children of the Comet" redeem a lot of the series negatives.
I think there's an overall difference in philosophy between the two shows on a few points. The original Star Trek, frankly, was built around rather jocular gunboat diplomacy. "We come in peace, shoot to kill". The Enterprise was as powerful as Kirk needed an inflection point in a given episode. And Kirk inflected... a lot.
Strange New Worlds is emphasizing Starfleet as a defensive support and exploration fleet. Advanced technology and science are on display but it really reinforces it being dedicated to exploration and experimentation. Of course, one could also wave this away due to Pike's Enterprise being the initial deployment of the Constitution. There is a major refit between here and the film era Constitution and one might imagine Starfleet gives in to growing threats and increases fighting capability with every refit.
Gonna humble brag here lol but I met the Brian Tatosky? VFX supe for CBS so he oversees ALL the vfx of SNW, Disco, and Picard
That's cool! Did you ask him anything?
Oh, my heart ached seeing the poor Enterprise so battered like that. Not even Khan was that brutal.
2:38 You see her hull coloring and markings beautiful.
Say what you will about Star Trek: Discovery, but we would not have gotten Strange New Worlds- and this gorgeous ship- without it.
@@SamaritanPrime When that's the only good thing that came out of a show it means it's not a very good show. But yeah, John Eaves is amazing
I know this is controversial, but I never really liked the TOS Enterprise. I get that it was revolutionary at the time, but the model has not aged well. The textures make it look like a cheap toy. And not just any cheap toy, but a knock-off you find at Dollar General.
This one though? I get it. SNW's Ent is gorgeous. It takes everything that was good about the original design, and makes it work today. It's the design finally living up to it's potential. She's a beautiful ship that does justice to her design.
What do you think about the nacelle pylons?
@@kurtkho96The design choice kind of makes sense since it would get them in the refit.
Yeah, I always thought the nacelle pylons in TOS looked super flimsy. Like there's no way they would hold up.
Nice compilation, still looking forward to see the refit into Kirk's Enterprise in SNW...
I love the star trek Stanger New worlds 🌎 uss enterprise 😊
She sure is pretty
Starship Enterprise Gets Succeed To Warp From Romulan Torpedo at 00:06:34
If it werent for the tacked on windows and angled pylons this would be a great update. I like this ship, but I dont love it.
According to Memory Alpha, the ship had straight pylons from the get-go. Designers John Eaves and Scott Schneider had never considered the swept-back design, because "we felt it would be jumping forward in time." It was the Pixomondo modelers who implemented the last-minute changes that eventually resulted in the onscreen version as ultimately featured in the series, such as the swept-back nacelle pylon configuration, the lengthened nacelles, the thickened neck and pylons, and other dimensional and proportional changes in order to meet Deverell's above-mentioned requirement to "cheat it as a larger ship". It was only two weeks before the redesign was slated to make its first onscreen appearance that Eaves and Schneider - who had no further design input while the model was being prepared at Pixomondo - were acquainted with the final version.
Ironically, the swept-back nacelle pylon configuration was something Matt Jefferies,the Godfather of Star Trek Starship design, had already conceived back in 1964 as a fallback option had the then-producers not liked the configuration as ultimately employed in Star Trek: The Original Series, but which was adopted for his later 1977 Constitution II-class model (co-)redesign.
memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Constitution_class_model_(retcon)#Design
@blairbrown4812 yes, I have heard that as well. It's a shame they made that change.
Is there a follow up video, with all the season 2 shots?
The TOS pylons always looked super flimsy to me. There's no way that would be a good design.
@permvw ua-cam.com/video/B-IcXkziDis/v-deo.htmlsi=ZfNzV6_RgFDiYfQ1
If my grandma had wheels she be a wagon
Ohhhhh it hurts to watch her get pounded like that...poor girl. but she's a strong one.
She,s a beauty a enterprise 😍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍
SFB fans rejoice in the remake of the famous and dreaded Romulan Plasma Torpedo...
4:31 - I love this bit, but i'm not at all keen on the enemy ship making a noise like a hurt animal when it gets hit....I don't get that.
Like the satellite in Star Trek V!
凝り宛Konコミュニケーションポストマン「」「」砂漠「：未〇祐太郎「」いいえ「」
いいえ
Would help if you could see the damn thing.😂
チャンネル有「」コミュニケーション「」「」大江さんのふぁぐん「」コミュニケーション「」「」大江さん
大江さん
大江さんKonコミュニケーションポストマン「」「」コミュニケーション「」「」大江さん「」大江さん「」
いいえいいえ
秋田「」コミュニケーション「」「」大江さん「」Konコミュニケーションポストマン「」「」「」コミュニケーション「」「」大江さん
井家さん
1:34
Error animation
I like the retro look of this ship a lot. I never liked the look of the movie reboot Enterprise. However, it's not the Millennium Falcon. An asteroid chase? Really?
What the reboot does better though is show the size of enterprise through motion. I love SNW but the ship maneuvers much too quickly and feels like it’s tiny to what it really is.
The reboots give it that massive, hard to fly feel.
リオデジャネイロKonコミュニケーションポストマン「」「」「」「」大江「」コミュニケーション講座いいえ
いいえ
いいえ
大江さん
ルコックデビュー
自己評価「＠：コミュニケーションオフィスコンコルドKonコミュニケーションポストマン「」
いいえファル「」コミュニケーション「」いいえ
ラン不穏なポスターコンクール攻撃「」江円筒「：大江さん＠：「」
大江さん工場
Major disparity between shots fired at and fired back.
So if this is supposed to be the Enterprise Kirk inherits, why are the pylons that carry the engines so different? It looks almost like a refit from one of the movies after the original series. Why can't they be content to duplicate the original considering this is supposed to be the original ship?
They probably follow the original concept of the Ship back in TOS time, in the idea where they put the Swept back Pylons instead of the Straight one (Which got implied later on)
大江さんKP工場工場Konコミュニケーションポストマン「」「」「」「」大江
I think if special effects artists have a scale of power demonstration of the starships...i.e. show what an average starship phaser shot can do to materials we know in THIS century , that could make what a starship can do ,more believable...You take a starship dodging and darting through enemy fire. The fact that the starship is so BIG, and it manuvers so quickly, AND artificial gravity holds everyone to the deck, AND the shields are glowing brightly repelling enemy fire. It's hard to believe that a powerplant that fits in the ship ,has that much power. ....SO...I propose...in the future... When a warpcore explodes.. it should look like a super nova per say like it would fuck up a planet, if it were in close orbit. Or show a phaser shot slice through hoover damn, like a hot knife through butter. Or when a starship LANDS on a planet, it should have a deafening thumbing sound of some sort. Like shatter windows in sky scrapers.. a photon torpedo should be able to turn half of Manhatten island into a burnt out creator 3/4 of a mile deep. Nothing standing. Not even randome girders from buildings. Just dust. Completely vaporized. I think then ...the multiple simultaneous expenditures of energy would be more believable in the space battles. Stay consistent with what kind of power each weapon HAS, the shields, so on.... Hope I helped something❤❤❤❤❤
Well, on the topic of matter-antimatter weapons, wikipedia states "The paramount advantage of such a theoretical weapon is that antimatter and matter collisions result in the entire sum of their mass energy equivalent being released as energy, which is at least two orders of magnitude greater than the energy release of the most efficient fusion weapons (100% vs 0.4-1%)" so yeah, they should fuck up a planet but I'm glad star trek has moved on from blowing planets up lol
I never liked that the Enterprise was changed to be as maneuverable as a fighter plane. It takes away the idea of a very large an heavy ship.
Even worse with the Enterprise-D doing a Millennium Falcon in Picard S3... 😞
Well your in the vacuum of space and there is no gravity and aerodynamics does not come into play
@@tonykickerkomp1653 No, but mass still does.
I genuinely don't mind updated looks or consoles etc for Star Trek, as long as the spirit of it is there. Unfortunately I don't really consider anything made from discovery onwards Star Trek as it has no spirit. I gave strange new worlds a chance but no, the characters don't do it for me.
I think SNW and Lower Decks are both good shows, and I didn't like Discovery at all
@@Anbello2 Both of those shows are awful. Standards of quality.
Not all about looks.
The cgi is better than mainstream movies
I hate the hyper-detailed grey Enterprise. Ship is a beauty in luminescent white. The trend is a little too "gunked-up" lately. Needs the simplification of clean lines.
The original Enterprise was simple, clear to read and faithful in its balance. The early design reflected that with flat and pearly monochrome colors. Its almost as if these designers don't understand that the Enterprise isn't supposed to look "real"
This enterprise design is much better than the jj verse.
She was beautiful before
Terzo
POP「」「」ポスターコンクール攻撃Konコミュニケーションポストマン「」「」「」「」大江工場大江さん
大江
primo
Metti like tr*ia
@@Anbello2 so l’unico che l’ha messo coglio
@@OsLiiiii allora arrivano dopo my bad
I don't know how they can make the ships look as ugly as they have been for the past 15 years, I mean do they have meetings about, 'you special effects lackey, make ugly ships go pew-pew".... sheesh! :(
Nu-Trek ships are all over-weathered. They look horrible.
@UmboCosiQualityGaming Can I integrate some parts of your amazing video to my music videos like "Progessive House - Melodic Techno" or other music videos ?
Yes, I don't own the footage in this video, paramount does. You'll probably get copyright striked by them
Ugly and weird looking flat different colored gray plating . One can do much better. They should take the models as reference and make that look work and then improve on details. It should say massive and weight.
That looks like complete amateur CGI crap
I love this version of the Enterprise, BUT I want to see it actual 2024 graphics. The way they chose to make it look like it came from the 2nd generation Xbox irritates the living daylights out of me!
Why the need to ruin the original design of the ship? And the shitty grey color? These are decisions made by people who are not Star Trek fans. Dear woke hollywood.. Not everything needs your "special touch" or new creative spin... You don't improve on perfection...
this enterprise looks sh*t
Don't like this cgi thing, also the sound it is making fits not for me. And why is it moving so fast around up and down. A starship is a heavy cruiser and should move slow - except the defiant. I don't like New Trek because it has nothing to do with the star trek I grew up with.
The ships have been cgi since the last seasons of DS9
Things evolve and change, staying identical to the past is not good for any franchise, it's just nostalgia talking
@@luizeduardoortizduarte4380wanting the heavy cruiser to act like a heavy cruiser has nothing to do with “nostalgia.”
@@luizeduardoortizduarte4380You can't really argue for change when you go back to TOS. If Star Trek must change, then it needs to move on from Kirk, Spock and the original 1701. Change would be focusing on the universe after Voyager, and not making a reboot of TOS and claiming its in the same universe
@@homeworld1765 i mean in technology, style and production value , I don't like nostalgia either, let TOS rest. But if you are going to revist it, the ship will move ike that cuz it can, wich wasnt possible in the 60s, i just dont think the hate on the series being on stuff like the ship sets and the production value.
Its really amazing how great "star Trek Continues" was on a shoestring budget from people who loved the original series compared to the CGI Woke dumpster fire that is SNW.
If this show wasn’t woke, I would watch it.
Booh hoo, imagine being so touchy
Imagine being completely unwilling to watch a show because you’re a bigot
It’s really not though?
ルコックデビュー