Get MagellanTV here: try.magellantv.com/almuqaddimah & get an exclusive offer extended to our viewers: an extra month FREE. MagellanTV is a new kind of streaming service run by filmmakers with 3,000+ documentaries! Check out our personal recommendation and MagellanTV’s exclusive playlists: www.magellantv.com/explore/history
Thanks Al Muqaddimah, we really needed this video! You would have brought many in the audience from a polemic to history. I am sure many of the people in the audience would have not been aware of this data.
There is no Rishi or Prophet of any religion in the world, whose entire history is available to us. But about Prophet Muhammad, even the begrudging Christian historian professor Hitti, had to acknowledge that *he was the only one of the world prophets to be born within the full light of history."* - History of the Arabs (chapter 8, page 3)
*Final & Ultimate Prophet* *Rishi-Prophet-Avatar-Buddha* Holy prophet Muhammad ﷺ was Kalki avatar proved beyond doubt by vedic scholars 1. Dr. Pandit Vedprakash Upadhyay (Sanskrit vedic scholar Prayag University, Allahabad) 2. Prof. Ashit Kumar Bandhyopadhyay (Former Howrah Sanskrit Academy Director & Sanskrit Professor) 3. Dr. M.A. Shrivastav (Sanskrit vedic scholar) 4. Pandit Dharm Veer Upadhyay (Sanskrit vedic scholar) 5. Aacharya Sanjay Dwivedi (Sanskrit vedic scholar) (Now Ahamed Pandit) 6. Scholar A.H. Vidyarthi 7. Acharya Shams Naved Usmani (Sanskrit vedic & Islamic scholar) 8. Professor Saraswati Prasad Chaturvedi, (former Head, Department of Sanskrit, Prayag University, Allahabad) 9. Swami Sri Ramanandji Saraswati (Sanskrit vedic scholar,Prayag University, Allahabad) 10: Mr. Abul Hossain Bhattacharya (Former Hindu Brahmin & vedic scholar) & 8 more Revered Sanskrit Scholars had confirmed the Kalki avatar is none other than Prophet Muhammad himself who is the ultimate prophet. Moreover Holy prophet Muhammad ﷺ was directly mentioned by name Mahammad & Ahamad in the Vedas & puranas as the ultimate Manifestation of Almighty God. (Vedas - Antim Rishi Narashansa (Holy prophet) Puranas - Last Avatar Kalki (Holy Prophet) Pali Scriptures - Last Buddha Maitreya (Holy prophet) Islamic Quran - Ultimate & Final Prophet)
I just finished watching them. And I have to say these videos were uploaded at a good time. Literally last week I started a discussion on the Yahweh, El, Moses, Abraham, etc... and their historicity. And no one in the discussion brought up Christ or the prophet Muhammad. Because everyone was sure they existed lol Although I remember years ago some guys had other crazy sources regarding the life of the prophet Muhammad. One of them believed the word "Muhammad" was actually used as a title for Christ. Another believed that he was from Syria/Palestine (the Levant) instead of Mecca and Medina. And another believed that he was a fabrication and didn't exist in the first place. It's safe to say that those are fringe theories. And the academic consensus was that he existed. Another interesting discussion (theory) is about Christ and his relation to the Pharisees. As well as the dead sea scrolls in general. I also have to add that there are many crazy theories on Christ. Like him being euhemerised myth and so on
I went to Muhammad first. I'm going to Jesus next. I'm a Biblical historian so I was pretty sure I'd already know what will be said, but I might learn something new 😋
Do a collab on the prophet Muhammad, tracking the development of his historic life and the development his belief system, which led up to the writing of the Qur'an. I put my faith in you, since I'm not quite sure if people, other than you two, could possibly create an unbiased and objective view on the topic.
@Amperoar TY I am sorry, what I've meant not the "develompent of HIS belief system", but how the process of the revelation of THE belief system correlates with the life and actions of the historic figure. What changes occurred in his lifetime during the revelation itself, which was written down.
There is no Rishi or Prophet of any religion in the world, whose entire history is available to us. But about Prophet Muhammad, even the begrudging Christian historian professor Hitti, had to acknowledge that *he was the only one of the world prophets to be born within the full light of history."* - History of the Arabs (chapter 8, page 3)
@@jamalmohamed5980 Why the little liar was real but he was a nobody. He made the Moon God the one true God. He did no miracle, he preached peace then went to war and killed thousands for his allah. He said the Jews and Christians were cousins in faith then went to war against both. He was a fool.
I grew up in a Christian household and I've always had so many questions about Islam because of how closely and yet distantly the three (including Judaism) are connected. I found this video so informative and so helpful and I'm eager to learn more.
As a Biblical historian, what are your views on the historical Jesus and what scholarly books do you recommend for the average fella to read? Good luck on your pursuit of truth BTW! :)
@@tompaulie7803 Paul William's does nothing more than peddle christophobic content and after being embarassed by Jay Dyer would never sit down and dialogue with a well read Christian scholar. Most of his points are either taken out of context or dont show refutations
@@majestyhype9605 Not a fair accusation. He mainly quotes from scholars mostly non Muslim. If you have one point that he brought that is not fair, you can bring it to light in good faith.
@@monoth4555 lmao he quotes non Muslim scholars that would say the exact same thing about Islam. why does he not mention any non Muslim scholars that write about Islam. Such as the fact that there existed tens of Kaabahs, that the story of the Miraj developed over time and the original hadiths didnt have Muhammad in Jerusalem...that the notion of hadiths is completely disregarded in scholarly reconstruction of history, that Mecca is not a historical city and did not exist till 6th century and mecca cant be found mentioned anywhere till the 8th century and isnt on a map till the 10th century....
SA: "Digging up Mecca and Medina for archeology? How dare you, don't you have any respect?!" Also SA: "Skyscraper 100 feet away from Kaaba? Well, that sounds like a great idea!"
doubt there is much of archeologic value left in Mecca, the Wahabi started destroying much of the graves and shrines including the shrine of Fastima as early as the start of the 19th century and have continued till today. Actually the Wahabi Saudi's destroyed more cultural heritage then IS.
Not just any skyscraper at that, it's the world's 3rd tallest building (and used to be the 2nd)! It infuriates me, how there is luxury right next to a place where you have to be modest. Would it hurt them no to build the tower right next to the Kaaba when they have cities like Ryad And Jedda.
@@kamion53 Those shrines you're talking about were built by the Ottomans. The early Islamic caliphates never built shrines over graves as it's forbidden in Islam. Hence why the so called Wahhabis destroyed it. They didn't destroy graves, they destroyed shrines.
@@xylonbanda people in Hajj need somewhere to sleep. I hate the sauds, but Mecca did need more hotel rooms, but they probably went about it the wrong way.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT I dont have a Patreon but as a viewer of your videos I hope you know that your making of these videos is a service to modern education. You have both my Subscription & my Thanks- whichever you think is more important. 🙂👍 😎👌 P.S. still looking forward to a "What *is* a 'Prophet', exactly?" 'Secular' [ history? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ] videos are sweet, but what about the theological idea about a prophet in general?
@@AlMuqaddimahYT From research into very scientific and historical sources, I have deduced that that person is either Queen Elizabeth or Keanu Reeves That or there were actually two! *Classic mystery-alien soundtrack plays*
Your channel, as well as those of “Let’s Talk Religion,” “Esoterica,” and “Religion for Breakfast” do excellent work. I’m especially glad that I found yours. I’m a Christian myself (I often call myself a “heretical Protestant” somewhat jokingly), but I have a deep fascination with and love for the world’s many faiths and their histories. (And I especially love the mystical dimensions of religion.) Islam is a faith with which I’ve always felt an especially deep kinship, having studied it for almost twenty-two years. It’s excellent to see more Muslims engaging with Islamic history and it’s major figures, ideas, and movements. You’ve got yourself a new subscriber. Asalaamu alaykum from an American grad student in India!
I'm so glad I found your channel! While I personally am atheist, I find the study of history and religion, psychology and sociology and how all of it is intertwined absolutely fascinating. Please keep up your amazing work ❤️
@@LR-kr9sz actually that's a known ... Impact...side effect...not sure of the best way to phrase it, of LSD, mushrooms, and other hallucinogens. I'll see if I can find some of the studies
I like the disclaimer that you did at the beginning. No one is going to be 100% unbiased in any research. At least we can know where you are coming from and how you set out to approach the topic. I think you did a very good job.
What I know, David and Solomon are not prophets, just kings according to Judaism and Christianity. I did not read the text that was referenced in the video but I understanded it as no prophet spreads his religion by sword what Joshua did not do.
@@Shahzada1prince what about Moses? He fought the amalekites and other people around those areas and also Jesus told his disciples to sell their clothes and buy swords
I checked the wikipedia, they're all considered prophets, though David and Solomon are also kings. ETA: all considered prophets in Judaism, not sure about Christianity.
@Arif Ahmed Khan This depends a lot on how you define "prophet". In the biblical tradition, a prophet is someone who speaks with and for God. Joshua would satisfy this, but not David or Solomon, IIRC. I don't have all the scripture memorized, but I don't recall any accounts of David or Solomon ever speaking directly with God, or having God speak directly to them, but rather they were counseled (and often rebuked, esp. in David's case) by a prophet of the time.
Hi! I am also Muslim and am a graduate student of history specialing in religious and ritual studies. Similar to you, I also had to grapple questions about my faith when I was studying and writing on the Islamicate world and reconciling it with history. Your preface made me at ease knowing that I am doing my best staying in objectivity but also staying in my faith. Thank you so much, and keep up the good work!
Brother... I don't understand what is the stuff that u both are talking about that u need to reconcile with ur faith? We already know that prophet Muhammad went into wars for example and we have all the stories about him and his wars since forever . Yes maybe we might see some violence in there but when we put everything there will be no problem! Because violence is necessary sometimes. Like banu qurathia بنو قريظة incident if u put it in its historical context I don't see a problem with it
The whole point was to view it from modern historical standards and from unbiased account, not considering Muslim authors. Comments mentioning Hadith as sources loose the point of the video. As a Muslim we all believe that the Hadith and the knowledge of it has immense merit and are true. But the objective approach demands the researcher to be outside the argument, reporting the findings on what there is, not on what he/she thinks. May Allah guide us all and give us toufeeq, and provide us with the understanding to follow the teaching of Prophet Muhammad SAWW in the best way possible. Ameen.
Bro you do know the whole point of hadith compilations like Bukhari was for the sole purpose of academically shifting through what was authentic and what was not? Hadiths did not come 200 years after the Death of the propht pbuh, they were there since his death, books like Sahih Muslim just collected them 200 years later when paper was freely available.
Not all Muslims believe in hadith collections, check Dr. Javad Hashmi, Mufti Abu Layth and many Muslims with sunni background. And if we bring mutazila /abadi /Ismaliis things get real complicated.
Thank you for this, I really appreciate having a place to learn about the history of Muhammad. As a Westerner, in school, we are not given any of this information, in our educational system. I really believe that it is up to us to learn about each other's cultures so we can learn to respect each other and get along better, as Earthlings.💜🙏🏻☮️
Why would you get information in your educational system about figures like Jesus or Muhammad? You probably did have some education about the religions themselves? The religions do exist, but It's not an historical fact these 'prophets' existed. So you'll probably not hear that much about it in history class..
@@jaronimo1976 I'm just astounded at how much we aren't taught, even about our own indigenous people, in school. Everything we are taught in school is from the European white man's standpoint.
@@GroovyKim I almost learned everything I know about history from European males. But since white people are the native people of my country, I don't mind. 🤪 A lot of the things I know about religion, I've read in the books of Karen Armstrong. A white human.. But female though! 😇
@@GroovyKim It's great you are open to different cultures and religions. Research everything and keep the good things. Eclectic.. But you shouldn't hate white men. It makes you a racist and a sexist. I've been a muslim myself for 3 years. Did you know in most accounts about Muhammad he is descibed as a white man? 😉
Terrible if people jump to takfir or name-calling tbh. I love Al-Muqaddimah's channel and it has educated me to a whole other degree concerning Islamic history; however, he said some questionable stuff in other videos that are obviously based off orientalist beliefs. One example is that he stated (using western English sources) that it was common for Caliphs to drink wine. Only if he knew, Islamically, how major of a statement that is--to claim a Caliph or any fellow muslim to doing a major sin without any reliable proof. Al-Mu'tadid (the Admin) states that they were excused to drink alcohol; however, there is nothing in the primary sources (of those time periods) that mention wine drinking. It only appears in the works of orientalists later on, the same works that tried to portray Caliph Al-Ma'mun as a homosexual (because he didn't fool around with the Harem women as much as others). Also, as Al-Mu'tadid rightfully mentioned, Caliphs used to lead the Friday Prayer for the muslims. Now, any muslim with a lick of knowledge in jurisprudence would know that the consuming of alcohol nullifies prayer for forty days, so how could the Caliph lead the prayer, with thousands following him, if he had drank the very previous nights? Anyways, that is my only critique, there may be one other, concerning this account; however, perfection belongs to Allah (swt) and I hope that Al-Mu'tadid or the owner of this channel will fix this mistake.
I think your videos are great. I just hope you take pride in Islam’s history. I’m not a Muslim but Islam has done so much for the world. The history of Islam is so interesting! Cheers from America!
@@Yanzdorloph Fully agreed, and people usually justify it by saying "well it drives some people to do better, to continue on with those achievements" and to that I say "might as well tell them Santa will reward them if they do that" Just because something gives some people a positive feeling doesn't make that thing logical
There are plenty of Muslim researchers who are open to both religious and non-religious interpretations and ideas. From the sunni community, I can name Mohammed Hijab, Hamza Tzortzis, Omar Suleiman and many others. A researcher named Nouman Ali Khan recently did a series comparing the story of Prophet Joseph in the Bible and the Quran. Also, I follow a shi’i scholar named Sayyed Kamal Al-Haydari who studies both secular and religious, also sunni, shi’i, sufi etc, sources. It’s too bad his lectures are only in Arabic and aren’t translated yet. You would have a hard time finding them because main stream academia promotes only the conservative and strict scholars. That goes for christianity and atheism as well.
I don't think you've been paying attention to all the academic research that has been going on about Islam and Islamic history for a long time. Edit: This research is being/has been carried out by Western secular academics. However you're not gonna find their work with flashy UA-cam videos. You gotta pick up a few books.
Yes that’s true, but I personally think it’s because us Muslims believe that the Quran was a direct source from Allah himself, and therefore it is good to not disagree with it, as it increases our faith
"Non-religious ", every and each conquered area and people were assimilated in Islam and Muslims. All research was started by translating Greek and Latin works into Arabic and Persian.
@@jun2011jh Because people were converting to Islam, so of course they would change their language to the language that part of their belief is tied to(the language of the Quran) and also Jews and Christians were allowed to live peacefully (Andalusia)
- What about the letter written by prophet Muhammad to the ruler of Rome? - What about the letter written by the king of Sri Lanka to prophet Muhammad pbuh which only arrived at the time of Abubakr Ra? What about the king of Kerala India who met prophet Muhammad pbuh and embraced islam after witnessing the moon being split?
Nobody outside of muslim tradition thinks that any of those are authentic. Not even all scholars of muslim faith. None of the evidence from the Hadiths of elsewhere can even be dated close to the time it is supposed to have happened. The example of the Sri Lankan kings's letter "arriving late" is sort of hilarious. You mean, almost as if produced by somebody who would have known Muhammad only from hearsay?
@@helpIthinkmylegsaregone oh the evidemce for his life part. Yeah thats not good evidemce. For all someone couldve known it could be a arabian mythological character that the people heard about
Glad to see you’re back! And tackling a subject I’ve often wondered about (admittedly as a non-Muslim) as well! I know Tom Holland discusses the historicity of Muhammad, but I especially appreciate someone approaching the topic with an actual background in Islam. Keep up the great work as always, friend!
@@HR-in1dm In his 2012 book “In the Shadow of the Sword”, he talked a great deal about the origins of Islam and the historical context for Muhammad and the Arabs’ rise in 600s AD.
@@RavingCelt009 I wouldn't take that book as facts if I was you, it had many other scholars saying that its filled with nonesense, both from western scholars and muslim ones
Even as a Christian, I have utmost respect for Muhammad and those who follow his teachings. Much love to you, thank you for making such an informative video!
You shouldn't have "upmost respect" for a murderer slave owner and above all else a paedophile who married a 6 year old and consummated his marriage at 9
@@hgg219 You have ignored the fact that such marriage in such age in such era was a natural matter, therefore it is clear that you are not criticizing the early marriage of a nine-year-old girl to a fifty-year-old man as much as you are keen to criticize and distort the picture of the prophet of Islam peace and blessings of Allah be upon him - and instigate others against him. Accordingly, this undermines your credibility and unveils your false human feelings and malicious intentions under the pretext of defending the rights of woman. if you were really seeking denouncing such marriage, they should have spoken about such marriage as a general phenomenon which appeared before Islam and continued after it and would not focus their criticism on one person as if he was the one who invented such marriage or the first one who applied it or the only one who did it. prophet Muhammad - peace and blessings of Allah be upon him - was born in a society in which early marriage was something ordinary and natural, therefore, he married the way others did. moreover, his enemies, who tried to kill him, did not use such marriage as a pretext to distort his picture or instigate against him because it was an ordinary matter in such era. The marriage in early ages was prevailing in Europe itself, especially the early marriage of kings and rulers in the twelfth century for the purpose of creating alliances guaranteeing the continuity of peace. An example for that is the empress Anias, in France, the wife of two Byzantine Emperors: Emperor Alexius Kamanis II, and the Emperor Andronikos Kamanos I, respectively. According to (William of Tyre), Anias was just eight years old when she reached Constantine while Alexios was thirteen years old (1). Moreover, the wife of Alexios Kamanos I was twelve years old when she married and became an empress before attaining fifteen years. As for the empress of Byzantium Theodora the wife of Manwel, she was thirteen years old when she married the Prince of Jerusalem Baldwin III moreover, Margret Maria Hingaria married Izak Anglos II when she was nine years. Also put in mind she reach and finished puberty making her by definition not a child(pre-pubescent) Read sahih Bukhari 476. The definition of a P3d0 is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. I proven she was not a Child (pre-pubescent) and her being a Adult whilst her age being young was possible during that time. Salam
Long comment warning..... After finishing the video, I think you are very dismissive of hadith reports on his life, yes most of the original hadith records were physically lost, but that ignores the fact the main way of transmitting books at the time was oral, and since thousands of students would memorise the hadiths from the original author, even if some got some of it wrong when recording it in a book, the error would be found quickly when comparing it with other sources, Abdullah bin omar recorded hadiths during the lifetime of the prophet, many of which his servant nafi' learned, and malik bin anas was a student of nafi', so only two men came before him when he recorded hadiths in his book al-muatta'(I've butchered the spelling) and he wasn't the first one to record hadith, many earlier sources recorded it, yes the original records are gone, but again physical writing down of books was considered a secondary way of saving them, memorising them was the main way, and because thousands of people did it, the chances a mistake would go unnoticed are low, especially how the prophet promised severe punishment for those who lie on his behalf, people were afraid of making mistakes when writing those hadiths down, and all the narrators of authentic hadith are known people who scholars of hadith know their names, background, knowledge, capacity for memorisation, throughout a very detailed process, even if it wasn't 100% correct, dismissing it would be like dismissing any record on Alexander the great's life because all surviving records are after his time and all of them were written by his successors who needed political legitimacy so they obviously didn't give a very accurate record, but that doesn't mean we can just dismiss it and say we know nothing about his life
100% Accurate. Only difference being that people actually spent the time to filter through the dodgy narrations thousands of years ago for the life of the Prophet(SAW)
@@heyyo6050 yes there are, same with prophet Mohammed, but the literal physical record doesn't exist, there are some inscriptions which do still exist, same with prophet Mohammed, but anything that talks about his life, his childhood, his battels, all are either sources that came later, or sources from his time, but the only surviving ones are copies not the original physical record
@@heyyo6050 "they are not hahaha so dumb" feels good to dismiss stuff you know absolutely nothing about if you know the rigourous criteria that need to be met for a hadith to be called authentic you would be shocked no instead satisfied with your belly full of that sweet ignorance you laugh. I feel sad for you and hope your openmindedness in other areas will be of use when you hear facts regarding religious matters too.
i am here after Usefull chart mention this channel. Thank You for giving us proves from scientific and historical side about the life of Prophet Mohammad
Although I am not a Muslim, I do believe that Muhammad existed. I would be rather shocked if he did not exist. As for the accounts of what all happened in his life, it would be interesting to know what is and is not true about his actual life.
@@آدمبرانسي One has to take a leap of faith though when it comes to the supernatural aspects of his story and whether or not you believe that such things are possible. For example, one can believe that Muhammad existed without also believing that angels exist.
@@halaldunya918 It would be really interesting to know who these various religious figures really were as I only see a few possibilities for any religious prophet. If we assume that a religious prophet existed, are we limited to the following interpretations of his life? 1) That this person really had some kind of divine connection. 2) That the person genuinely believed that he had a divine connection but was mistaken in that belief for whatever reason, be it having been manipulated by others, the result of drug use, mental illness, etc. 3) That the person was deliberately lying about their prophetic or messianic role to gain influence over others for nefarious purposes. 4) That the person was deliberately lying about their prophetic or messianic role for what he believed to be a greater good.
I did not see any "jerk" comments, people are civil for the most part. All it seems is that you are trying to create/amplify non-existent/niche-minority "jerk" comments, which perhaps has to do with your preconceived notions that you are projecting here.
Does it make sense that taking only *non-muslim* sources to account and ignoring all Muslim sources? Logically It doesn't to me. Why would I look for references in sources where Muhammad wasn't? It's like trying to find oxygen in Mars when you already know there's no oxygen in Mars. In fact, Muslim souces are most reliable compared to all non-muslim sources as Muslim sources contain rich literature.
I do not think you understand. I will attempt to explain. Suppose you wanted find out if Moses existed. The jews would point to their ancient scrolls and the Torah. Of course they have evidence to present. Moses is a central figure in THEIR religion. So there is built in bias here. But what if you found a clear citing of the name of Moses on an Egyptian tablet or on the wall of an ancient Egyptian tomb that had been sealed for over 4000 years? Now you have evidence not shrouded in Jewish tradition and religion. This evidence seems more corroborative because it is impartial, not subject to Jewish bias. That is why evidence of Muhammad OUTSIDE Islam would be more desirable.
Think about it. You are looking for the historical existence not religious. It’s called Bias. Not saying all Muslims would lie or embellish but Muslims are just human after all. Humans cannot be trusted. You need someone who doesn’t care at all if he existed or not, doesn’t matter to them at all, they are reported what they saw. It’s easy to understand. Would you believe a Christian writing about Christ Jesus or a non Christian writing about Jesus more. I would. Same with any historical figure like kings and pharaohs.
The idea is that non-Muslim sources would not be biased in favour the way that Muslim sources would. So if you have a non-Muslim source saying one thing, and a Muslim source says the same thing or doesn't contradict it, we can assume it's true to a standard that would satisfy non-Muslims too.
In UsefulCharts's video he outlined the historical method where the most compelling evidence would be personal artifacts or works from the subject historical figures. It's a bit disappointing that this is not applied uniformly to the video series, and you pretty much skipped right to the third option. As others have pointed out, Muhammad PBUH has dispatched diplomatic correspondence to both Rome and Persia, with His seal, and those still exists.
Exactly. There are a number of his letters still preserved. And the physical evidence of existence can't be ruled out this easily. Artifacts, clothes, swords, and other things related directly to him still exists. And his grave's location is well known and not speculated.
The first hadith collection was done by imam malik.Imam malik was born in 93 A.H and died in 179A.H so not after 200years!He even met nafi was an ex slave of hazrat abdullah bin umer who was the son of hazrat umer.The writing of the hadith collection by imam malik had been started at around 163A.H.
And he dismissed going into the science of hadeeth collection. The strength of the memory of the Arabs, the rigorous testing of hadith b4 they were accepted or even when written how they were graded according to their authenticity. How literally every authentic hadeeth has a chain of narrators going back to the prophet SAW and how studying these narrators and their reliability is a science of its own which became well established not long after the death of the Prophet
@@zahraaghaswala This my friend is called post-colonial inferiority complex where a person only finds stuff written by the westerners as reliable.Sad reality.Our sahih hadith have chains going back to the Prophet(PBUH).Whereas western writtings on average rarely have chains going back to a specific person
@@ZombieBraintrust Whoever has studied hadith knows that it contains Islamic laws and Islamic practices but ALSO about the life of the Prophet.There are so many event of the Prophet present in muwatta of imam malik which was the first hadith collection.Also in other sahih hadith so yeah I dont think that is the reason bro
In a country like India where Islam is often vilified and demonised by politicians, we need more objective Scholarship to understand the actual history and philosophy of Islam ☪️ . After all 2 billion people follow this religion.
@@ProfessorJack_IIM Mashaallah 😘😘 MUHAMMAD ﷺ (peace be upon him) is the best human in the world 😍😘 Islam is the most beautiful religion in the world 😍😍. PROUD to be MUSLIM😌😌😇😇 MUSLIM means, (submit the will to god(allah),.)
Always Remember The roots of sanatan Dharma is Curiosity And Debate to find Answer of the questions and To find More Questions Never have the sheep mentality that some xyz guy who made his son Divorce his wife in order to satisfy his lust have answers to everyrhing
@@imanatafridi7212 cool story bro, you really good with fiction stories, I know kids usually have a big imagination where they imagine bukhari said something he didn't, and imagine abu dawood said something he didn't say, kids and their imagination, also how will jesus punish every Muslim ever when he couldn't even defend himself against some Jewish soldiers, a god who can't defend himself from being literally killed then crucified is no threat to me.
@@imanatafridi7212 it’s amazing how non muslims try to tarnish Islam with hilariously and utterly false claims. You mentioned Jesus, so I’m guessing that you also know about the Biblical story in which Lot impregnates both his daughters! Genesis 19:30 to 19:37. Have fun explaining that
@@Goodguy507 As a universalist, I doubt that all Muslims will be punished. But all humans will be judged. Sorry for the weirdo attacking you though. He's a vocal minority. Your attack on Christianity however utterly fails. A willing sacrifice for the sake of many isn't the same as fighting. This is similar to a strawman. You misrepresent the crucifixion as a failed rebellion (Jesus wasn't as violent as Mohamed. Even Muslims should grant that The Prophet Isa was peaceful) when in reality it was a simple means to an end. This end being the salvation of humanity. Jesus was Pacifistic and had no intention of harming his creations. Why would a pacifist fight against a willing sacrifice? Why would a Father harm his ignorant and angry kids whom he knows doesn't know any better? It's like saying you have no respect for a fire fighter who sacrificed his life to save people from a fire because he died in it by willingly putting his life on the line. This is a misunderstanding of Christian Theology on your part. Granted, I don't hold to fast to penal substitution as I'm far more a fan of Christus Victor. By Christs resurrection, he has permanently defeated death. That at least calls for grand praise. Hence, the Christian's believe and hope. Let us agree to respect each others religions.
@@monarchblue4280 He never classified Jesus' crucifixion as a failed rebellion. Simply that as per your bible, God was humiliated by pagans. God the ALL MIGHTY. He can not be humiliated. "Jesus wasn't as violent as Muhhamed." If you Believe Jesus is literally God, then this is false. God punishes people severely and orders his followers to violently attack his enemies in the Old Testament. " Why would a Father harm his ignorant and angry kids whom he knows doesn't know any better? " In all Abrahamic traditions, God literally floods the entire world to punish the Corrupt. The cities of Sodom and Gomorrah are smited for their wickedness. Humanity DOES know better because they received revelation from God. They cannot claim ignorance.
As a muslim I respect your honesty . Because if you a real muslim you should be honest about everything even your religion Thank you for sharing this knowledge
Great video! It’s wonderful to see Muslims interested in the history of their faith from a non-apologetic perspective. It sound like a really exciting project.
What about the letters of the Prophet (s.a.w.) that he sent to the different rulers of his time? I feel like those should have been mentioned in a video like this.
@Ateeba Kamran just ignore him. They don't have anything so concrete in their religion - or whatever B.S. he believes in now... Most of them are miserable atheists now.
do you really think he wouldn't include the letters if they existed? He's literally a Muslim and he would dig himself into anything that would prove Muhammad was real. Even if the letters existed no one is allowed to do any dating to make sure they are not forgeries.
There is no Rishi or Prophet of any religion in the world, whose entire history is available to us. But about Prophet Muhammad, even the begrudging Christian historian professor Hitti, had to acknowledge that *he was the only one of the world prophets to be born within the full light of history."* - History of the Arabs (chapter 8, page 3)
As a muslim, i dont understand how u can be called munafiq or murtad for this. Its very informative :D also watched ur vid about the quran and its versions. Theyre all interesting.
Allah is fictional character and so may be pedophile mohammad who rode on donkey to moon 🌙and split it into two and those who question bull shit in quran are Atheist or murtad
Prophet Muhammad obviously existed, Proof? There are so many descendants of prophet Muhammad Example? Sultan Abdullah II (Jordan) Sultan Brunei Sultan Kelantan (Malaysia) Sultan Perlis (Malaysia) And many many more !!
وَقَالَ صلى الله عليه وسلم: (الْبَخِيلُ مَنْ ذُكِرْتُ عِنْدَهُ فَلَمْ يُصَلِّ عَلَيَّ💓💓💓🌴🌴 والتحدث لم يذكر مرة واحدة الصلاة على خير الخلق صل الله عليه وسلم.... 👍الراوي منافق يدعي الإسلام ويخفي الحقد والكره👍 The Prophet (ﷺ) said: "The miser is the one in whose presence I am mentioned yet does not pray for Allah's blessings upon me."Reference:At-Tirmidhi 5/551 and others. See also Al-Albani, Sahih At-Tirmidhi 3/177 and Sahihul-Jarai' As-Saghir 3/25.
Should mention the utmost care of filtering hadith (Sahih, dhaif, munkar, maudhu.. etc). Probably the most quoted person in history, how can some people doubt he existed.
@@nakkadu Nope, if you watch the video, or any related videos, it was his existence questioned. Usually because lack of record outside religious traditions or outside arabia. Which kinda hard cause any report of his speech or doing, considered as religious rules, and the rest of the world kinda ignore arabia at that time.
@@finhas8865 Most non-religious people realise all the stories about flying horses and moon splitting are made up, but willingly accept some guy called Mohamed existed - it's not an important enough claim to argue with.
@@Adem-gz4uh I really think so because according to by enlarge these so called liberal Muslims if west recognize our genuine and true struggle for our faith and our true Muslim history then they believe and accept this then what kind of morality exists in this liberal leprosy class
There's a lot of lack of historical criticism in your assumption. Several letters that have been attributed to Paul or Peter in the NT for centuries are now dismissed as authentics by the majority of Christian scholars
@@joaquim64rodrigues just because of this we assume that they not actually exist or these are just a imaginary characters remember that the whole Muslim nations and the existence Islam is only based on the existence of Muhammed (SAW) he is only foundation of Islam
@@AlMuqaddimahYT According to Doctrina Jacobi, did not Muhammad (salaa allah ealayh wasalam) live? please help me !🥺 Isn't the person mentioned in Doctrina Jacobi the same person as our Prophet?
@@AlMuqaddimahYT the first mention of the prophet comes only 2 years after the prophets death? So you take European sources to when he is mentioned but ignore his Arab companions? Why because they weren’t white? How do you ignore the science of hadeeth and the preservation of history through the Arabs but acknowledge how Europeans preserved history from a thousand years ago? This is a joke some straight up inferior type of thinking clearly all your teachers are non Muslim Europeans.
@@Islam.is.the.truth.. because the islamic sources need to be verified because they're biased, which he cannot do. While if there are Bezyntine records or persian records or records from any other nation it means that he most definitely existed as these nations have no reason to lie or fabricate things about Muhammad.
Another thing is that how do you say that a lot of people choose to worship Allah and Muhammad? Are these people really choosing? Or are these people indoctrinated since birth however and brainwashed to believe a certain way and if they start to actually look at it scientifically and see how they have to follow blindly and literally submit because the Quran says to submit that means basically be a slave to this religion because that’s all you know as a child and if you do question any of it you possibly could be killed and you will definitely lose your family and friends and be ostracized because of it so really is that a choice are these people really choosing or is It purely being indoctrinated and brainwashed since birth and it has repeated so many generations that your kids and your kids kids will be enslaved and indoctrinated and brainwashed into Islam without a choice like you said before you said millions of people choose to worship but are they really? Religion is control religion is brainwashing and religion is relentless and having your own choice and thinking for yourself within a gigantic group cult religion whatever you wanna call it is always looked down upon. Follow the herd or go against the herd is The reality of ☪️
What about those Letters send by Prophet Muhammad S.A.W to kings and rulers outside Peninsular Arab in year 6 Hijrah inviting them to Islam signed by him
I don't know why he ignored many other factors and also moving on just by a silly mention on Hadiths, and neglecting the many other records, seems like covering up all these or what! Idk..... His way of presentation & overall Work is Great but that doesn't make it True. Gotta be careful on his works.
My dads name is Mohammed, my brother Ahmed and loads of my uncles cousins and relatives aswells. I'm a teacher in Iraq. Quarter of Each class I teach has students who's name is Mohammed another quarter Ali.
As a former Muslim, i had three choices to consider. 1- Mohamad did not exist , in which case Islam would be false 2-Mohamad did exist and the Quran is revealed to him. 3- To read the Quran and evaluate it for myself. I decided to go with choice # 2 & 3. Conclusion: After reading the Quran , i came to the conclusion that there’s no way that God is the author of the Quran. Surahs 33:50, 24:61, 9:29, 64:17, 5-101,14:4, 33:56,4:24 , etc… were enough for me to leave Islam. Now, devout muslims try to use the tactic i call “ the miracle of reinterpretation “ to say , oh , you don’t know the meaning of this verse , or you don’t speak Arabic ( like , why would the God of the universe would wanna send a scripture in a language that’s only spoken by 5 % of the population?)..
@På Luffen dude, I don't know what crazy muslim friends you have but there is no sunni muslim who will tell you that ahadith are fake. Plus I don't know of any historien who claims that the last prophet didn't exist, this is even worse than flat earth conspiracy theorists...
@På Luffen and just to clarify since you seem to be confused but any one who reject all the ahadith are Quranist by definition, anybody who follow the ahadith are sunni by definition. Unless you belong to a specific sect that have a different methodology in filtering ahadith (theological one and not historical) like shiaa. Edit: spelling.
As a non-Abrahamic individual, I really loved this series as it deals with the questions with carefully analyzed facts, figures, and logic, rather than focusing on faith and speculation. Kudos to you for being able to stay objective and not giving in to your personal beliefs. Keep up the good work.
If you are interested dr Yasir qadhi has great biography of him that you can easily find on UA-cam. Type seerah of prophet by yasir qadhi. Very detailed and also talks about sources that are used for his life
This was an amazing video! As one of the”liberal Christians” you mentioned, and an ordained minister, and an academic I am thrilled to see someone doing this! That takes a lot of dedication, and I would imagine, some bravery. Is there any historical analysis of the Quran, or any resources out there equivalent to The Jesus Seminar, or the Search for the historical Muhammad? Any recommendations would be welcome.
6:34 you claimed hadith date back to the 9th century, the Sahifah Hammam ibn Munabbih was written before 101H the authors date of death (early 8th century) Musannaf of Ibn Jurayj was written before 150H (8th century) and the hadiths it contains are also in Musannaf of Abd al-Razzaq which was written before 211H
@@iceinmyveins998 his method is neither objective nor neutral because it relies on a naturalist method. He tried to immunise himself from critique by playing the victim card and depicting his critics as unintellegent and uninformed brutes. He made the false statement that hadith were only composed 200 years after the death of the Prophet. He depicted everything from Muslim as biased whereas citation from enenemies of Islam and competing religions are according to him unbiased. He dismisses the offspring of the Prophet and so.
On reading the title, I thought it's going to be a regular Islamophobic video. But I was wrong! Good work indeed. I explored your channel, it's amazing + u earned a sub!
@@worfoz That's subjective and on common ground arguable whether it's offensive or not, actually it shouldn't be offensive to you and the reason is simple, we don't know how did the Prophet (peace be upon him)actually look like so any depiction would not reflect the reality which in your case whether depicted or not wouldn't benefited you in some way while for us Muslims it is offensive because not only it does not and could not represent the real Prophet of Islam (peace be upon him) it then add to the disrespect that could be done onto his character which you may not grasp and that's your value not ours. However, allow me to ask you why would it be offensive to you? My take is that the only reason you claim it is offensive is because somehow you feel like your liberty of expression is being repressed or that your value is not given a priority, wouldn't you agree with that? And if you do, aren't you then claiming some sort of privilege over us? And please give a valid reason why you ought to be privileged if you assume so.
This guy obviously time travelled from the golden age of Islam. He certainly has all the traits are long lost among Muslims such as as criticising, research, neutral approach the matters of religion. Respect!
Always good to see a new video from you, I swear I learn something new with each video! I commend your approach with this subject and your ability to take a objective approach to it. I hope you have a good day man and keep making these awesome videos!
This series was enjoyable and very informative. It's a shame that you're getting hate for your installment in the comments from who don't understand how historical methodology is done. They appear to just be the vocal minority based on the like and dislike ratio. I'm definitely subscribing to your channel because you cover very interesting topics and you try your best to be unbiased.
I really admire your objectivity. I am an American that has been living in Islamic countries for 17 years and as you know, most believers dare not consider anything outside standard dogma. Unconventional thinking or discussions can barely take place among people. It is so sensitive spiritually to most Muslims that any intellectual mentions can start an angry encounter. There is no off-path discussions allowed for most. I found you from Let‘s Talk Religion and I have happily subscribed. Thank you. Jude of Egypt
I'm incredibly amazed at both the honesty and sensibility of the disclaimer and of the sources presented. A lot about Islam ends up being ignored or made to fit notions of religion in the Jewish or Christian senses, and that can end up creating some nonexistent parallels while real connections are considered too complex to teach at a public school level. This channel fixes that, at least for me.
I came across this channel after watching the Sana'a Manuscript video and have enjoyed your informative videos. All I have to say is you don't have to qualify about giving historical information by pronouncing that you are approaching the topic in a "secular" or "liberal" manner. After all critical thinking is a very large part of why Islamic empires produced so much work on philosophy and logic.
“Prophets doesn’t come with a sword” well,what about moses,joshua,david,ezekiel,samuel and solomon..like even jesus in matthew 10:34 said:”"Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.” And he said in luke 19:27:”But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them--bring them here and kill them in front of me.'"
@@worfoz Quran says:”we sent you,O prophet mohamed but as a mercy to all the creatures (21:107).In another verse it says:”And indeed, you are of a great moral character”(68:4)...n many verses like that..According to us,this Quranic verses are from God and the hadith is the words of the prophet peace be upon him...anyway,i feel like you have an excessive hate towards islam bro...prophet mohamed can’t rape a person😢he never even slapped or shouted on his wives or servants..Our beloved aisha and he’s servant zayd ibn malik said so...they said,he was very humble and cheerful and if we asked for something he gave us all what he had...His companions like abubakr and Umar said that prophet mohamed transform in battles,from a person as gentle and shy as a virgin in her wedding to a lion in the battlefield who isn’t scared of death..but not to be offensive bible has many sexual abuse verses..i’ll not show you the worst but i’ll give you one that i’ve read yesterday...according to numbers 31:17 it says that moses said:” Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man,but save for yourselves every little girl who has never slept with a man.”
@@ademjrad9994 Yes, that proves that your book is man made and corrupt but I already know that muhamed was not a muslim, the CURSED name of this child rapist is not mentioned in your man made quran
@@worfoz what an ignorant😂😂the name mohamed was mentioned five times in the quran and we literally have a hole chapter called “mohamed”...insult him,as you like,it will not change nothing but just the possession of the devil over you..indeed,you’ll die and no one will care abt you,but the prophet pbuh is loved and followed by 1.9 billion persons and was chosen as the greatest man in the world by michael hart in the guiness..anyway,you said that the quran is man made...well look at this..quran said that it will come a time when the romans will be weaker than the persians,they will be defeated in the first two battles but they will win the last one in the lowest point on earth and all this exactly happened after 7 years..quran said that the asphyxiated body of ramsis 2 will not vanish and will be found in the futur as a sign for the nonbelievers and it was found in 1978 and the historian that looked into the dead body,Maurice bucaille became Muslim after being agnostic.the prophet said that it will come a time when barefooted arabs will compete in highest buildings and that they will build the highest building in the world and it happened in 2011(burj khalifa)..and he said that it’s a minor sign of the end of times..he also said that it will come a time when someone will make up a lie and this lie will reach far est and west in the afternoon and that’s happening now in socialmedia..an account with big followers can make up a lie in morning and it will reach far est n west in the afternoon..wanna more evidence??”which of the favors of your lord would you deny”(Quran 55:13)
@Al Muqaddimah you said in 7:54 "we have no idea how for instance the Umayyads thought about the Prophet's life" yes we know the Umayyads Dynasty continued in Andalusia (Spain) for 8 centuries, if Abbasids change history in the east then the Umayyads would know and had another version which never happened
Out of the three videos, I have the most respect for this video as the honesty and effort to be objective could be argued to be more difficult for the creator.
I don't know why he ignored many other factors and also moving on just by a silly mention on Hadiths, and neglecting the many other records, seems like covering up all these or what! Idk.... .
@@rabiaadam lol,😂 Are you recommending the video of JAY SMITH... who was debunked by Muslim Historian Adnan Rashid..., All he sticks to is twisted narratives according to his anti-muslim agenda..Stay away frm his content, If you r seeking knowledge
One of the most interesting 7th century accounts about Prophet Muhammad comes from Sebeos who was a Bishop of the House of Bagratunis. Sebeos is the first non-Muslim author to present us with a theory for the rise of Islam that pays attention to what the Muslims themselves thought they were doing: *At that time a certain man from along those same sons of Ishmael, whose name was Mụhammad, a merchant, as if by God's command appeared to them as a preacher and the path of truth. He taught them to recognize the God of Abraham, especially because he was learnt and informed in the history of Moses. Now because the command was from on high, at a single order they all came together in unity of religion. Abandoning their vain cults, they turned to the living God who had appeared to their father Abraham. So, Muhammad legislated for them: not to eat carrion, not to drink wine, not to speak falsely, and not to engage in fornication. He said: 'With an oath God promised this land to Abraham and his seed after him for ever. And he brought about as he promised during that time while he loved Israel. But now you are the sons of Abraham and God is accomplishing his promise to Abraham and his seed for you. Love sincerely only the God of Abraham, and go and seize the land which God gave to your father Abraham. No one will be able to resist you in battle, because God is with you.* *- R. G. Hoyland, Seeing Islam As Others Saw It: A Survey And Evaluation Of Christian, Jewish And Zoroastrian Writings On Early Islam, 1997, p. 129* We can see that Sebeos knows plenty of personal information about Prophet Muhammad. For example, he is aware that Muhammad was a merchant by profession before his Prophethood. He hints that his life was suddenly changed by a divinely inspired revelation. He presents a good summary of Prophet Muhammad's preaching i.e belief in One God and Abraham as a common ancestor of Jews and Arabs. He even picks out some of the prohibitions which are mentioned in the Qur'an, such as false speech and drinking of alcohol. All this information that Sebeos presents accurately conforms to the Islamic traditions. Many take such detailed, early and accurate accounts about Prophet Muhammad for granted but it's actually quite rare with figures from ancient history.
I enjoyed your intro, your video, and this collaboration. Thank you for the quality information. I highly appreciate your goal of being objective, as well as that same goal by the other two contributors. Excellent work to you three.
Pioneer work, great to see that there are religious people who can be also rational. Very very important thing, the key to the Muslim revival, growth, and peace!
Bcz religion is th e only source of knowledge about unseen. Our present knowledge is limited to this world also it is just from day of Our birth till day of Our death. Explanation about what gona happen before and beyond this 2 points is found only in religion text book. Until those Atheist manage to find undeniable proof that God doesn't existed, for now I'm gona hold on to avalibale conventional manual (holy book). So good luck for you guys. Remember time is ticking.
Not religious myself but I find religions and the different belief systems they have very interesting. In particular I’ve been diving a bit into learning about Islam lately since, as an American, it’s not something we really learn about in depth. Excellent work!
I had heard that at some point Muhammad wrote a letter to the Roman Emperor of the time, basically saying "convert or we'll invade". The Romans ignored him, but (that's what I heard) they archived the letter, as state correspondence, so when Mehmet II conquered Constantinople the letter was found in the Imperial archives. I have no idea if that's true, it's something I heard one time.
" I invite you with the invitation of peace. If you submit then you will find safety and God will double your reward. If you turn away, you will bear the Arians’ sins." Still, it is not historically "accurate" as it doesn't come from a non islamic source
@@moudhaffarsaidi9457 Arian's sins, I don't think Muhammad even knew about any Arians nor their beliefs but warning them about God cursing them with heretical sin was very ironic to hear when you're Christian since they used to did the same towards their faith brethrens.
@@apalahartisebuahnama7684 That's what was supposedly written in the letter, and there were many christian tribes and individuals in arabia of all sects, the stories also say that the prophet knew a christian arab and that he told him he was a prophet, so there is a good chance he knew a thing or two about christianity, and whether he knew about Arians or not is a matter of debate. And as I said, the letters are not historical proofs, at least to some academics
for me, who is generally not religious, i love those videos. it gives context, to peoples beliefs, without insulting, very objective. and its very interesting for the study of the history of civilisation and religion. very interesting. peace and love to all my muslim brothers.
Yea dude, you’re committing kufr by giving the so-called “historical” viewpoint credibility. If you truly believe in Muhammad ﷺ, you should make it clear that you renounce the “historical” and “liberal” viewpoint before you present it. This is how you can “reconcile” your work with the deen.
If Al-Muqaddimah sees this comment, just a correction concerning your most recent video: we do, in fact, have hadith compilations from the time of the prophet (saw) himself or from his companions. This includes: The Saheefa of Amr Ibn Al-As (incorporated into Musnad Imam Ahmad) , Saheefa of Ali ibn abi Talib (incorporated into Bukhary) , Saheefa of Sa'ad ibn Obadah (incorporated into Tirmidhi), a book of Zakah by Abu Bakr as-siddiq (incorporated into Bukhary), the Sermons of the prophet by Abu Shaam Al-Yamaani. Although the last two aren't formally hadith compilations, they are teachings of the prophet (pbuh) nonetheless.
To believe in Adolf Hitler or Jesus or Mohammed or Gandhi or Napoléon by Mental Necessities and through testimonies U have no academic methodology to claim that if the Roman spoke about Muhammad in their sources that could be right or reliably so let us give u other methodology if u killed a men and none sow u how we can prove that u killed we search about testimony if u killed in public that means u have no reason to deny we know that more than 100000 people claimed that the sow Muhammed face to face if someone lied in public about spreading a thought about Muhammad's existence and we believed in him that like making all the people stupides
10:27 Maybe it is of Muta battle in north Jordan, because it was in his lifetime, before 3 years of his death, and the sheet written a few years later. Also, maybe some non-muslims due to bad translation that days they thought that Prophet Muhammad was still alive.
As an academic and a Muslim I thoroughly enjoy this channel and this video! 🙌🏽 May Allah SWT continue to guide you and forgive you and each of us who believe in Allah, The Prophet PBUH, The Books, the Angels, & The Final Day & Decree from our Lord. Ameen 🤲🏽
Get MagellanTV here: try.magellantv.com/almuqaddimah & get an exclusive offer extended to our viewers: an extra month FREE. MagellanTV is a new kind of streaming service run by filmmakers with 3,000+ documentaries! Check out our personal recommendation and MagellanTV’s exclusive playlists: www.magellantv.com/explore/history
Thanks Al Muqaddimah, we really needed this video! You would have brought many in the audience from a polemic to history. I am sure many of the people in the audience would have not been aware of this data.
You talk about jewish temple and you call this scientific??
Bro ,I know this channel from 2 years and it was never THIS HUGE
There is no Rishi or Prophet of any religion in the world, whose entire history is available to us. But about Prophet Muhammad, even the begrudging Christian historian professor Hitti, had to acknowledge that *he was the only one of the world prophets to be born within the full light of history."*
- History of the Arabs (chapter 8, page 3)
*Final & Ultimate Prophet*
*Rishi-Prophet-Avatar-Buddha*
Holy prophet Muhammad ﷺ was Kalki avatar proved beyond doubt by vedic scholars
1. Dr. Pandit Vedprakash Upadhyay (Sanskrit vedic scholar Prayag University, Allahabad)
2. Prof. Ashit Kumar Bandhyopadhyay
(Former Howrah Sanskrit Academy Director & Sanskrit Professor)
3. Dr. M.A. Shrivastav (Sanskrit vedic scholar)
4. Pandit Dharm Veer Upadhyay (Sanskrit vedic scholar)
5. Aacharya Sanjay Dwivedi (Sanskrit vedic scholar)
(Now Ahamed Pandit)
6. Scholar A.H. Vidyarthi
7. Acharya Shams Naved Usmani (Sanskrit vedic & Islamic scholar)
8. Professor Saraswati Prasad Chaturvedi, (former Head, Department of Sanskrit, Prayag University, Allahabad)
9. Swami Sri Ramanandji Saraswati (Sanskrit vedic scholar,Prayag University, Allahabad)
10: Mr. Abul Hossain Bhattacharya (Former Hindu Brahmin & vedic scholar)
& 8 more Revered Sanskrit Scholars had confirmed the Kalki avatar is none other than Prophet Muhammad himself who is the ultimate prophet.
Moreover Holy prophet Muhammad ﷺ was directly mentioned by name Mahammad & Ahamad in the Vedas & puranas as the ultimate Manifestation of Almighty God.
(Vedas - Antim Rishi Narashansa (Holy prophet)
Puranas - Last Avatar Kalki (Holy Prophet)
Pali Scriptures - Last Buddha Maitreya (Holy prophet)
Islamic Quran - Ultimate & Final Prophet)
Who else watched the Moses and Jesus videos and is finishing up with this one?
basically everyone
I am also part of that group
ME ME ME!!!
I just finished watching them.
And I have to say these videos were uploaded at a good time. Literally last week I started a discussion on the Yahweh, El, Moses, Abraham, etc... and their historicity. And no one in the discussion brought up Christ or the prophet Muhammad. Because everyone was sure they existed lol
Although I remember years ago some guys had other crazy sources regarding the life of the prophet Muhammad. One of them believed the word "Muhammad" was actually used as a title for Christ. Another believed that he was from Syria/Palestine (the Levant) instead of Mecca and Medina. And another believed that he was a fabrication and didn't exist in the first place.
It's safe to say that those are fringe theories. And the academic consensus was that he existed.
Another interesting discussion (theory) is about Christ and his relation to the Pharisees. As well as the dead sea scrolls in general. I also have to add that there are many crazy theories on Christ. Like him being euhemerised myth and so on
I went to Muhammad first. I'm going to Jesus next. I'm a Biblical historian so I was pretty sure I'd already know what will be said, but I might learn something new 😋
Always great to work with you! Thanks for this collaboration!
@Amperoar TY beep
Do a collab on the prophet Muhammad, tracking the development of his historic life and the development his belief system, which led up to the writing of the Qur'an. I put my faith in you, since I'm not quite sure if people, other than you two, could possibly create an unbiased and objective view on the topic.
@Amperoar TY I am sorry, what I've meant not the "develompent of HIS belief system", but how the process of the revelation of THE belief system correlates with the life and actions of the historic figure. What changes occurred in his lifetime during the revelation itself, which was written down.
There is no Rishi or Prophet of any religion in the world, whose entire history is available to us. But about Prophet Muhammad, even the begrudging Christian historian professor Hitti, had to acknowledge that *he was the only one of the world prophets to be born within the full light of history."*
- History of the Arabs (chapter 8, page 3)
@@jamalmohamed5980 Why the little liar was real but he was a nobody. He made the Moon God the one true God. He did no miracle, he preached peace then went to war and killed thousands for his allah. He said the Jews and Christians were cousins in faith then went to war against both. He was a fool.
I grew up in a Christian household and I've always had so many questions about Islam because of how closely and yet distantly the three (including Judaism) are connected. I found this video so informative and so helpful and I'm eager to learn more.
As a Biblical historian, what are your views on the historical Jesus and what scholarly books do you recommend for the average fella to read?
Good luck on your pursuit of truth BTW! :)
@@monarchblue4280 check out a channel called Blogging Theology
@@tompaulie7803 Paul William's does nothing more than peddle christophobic content and after being embarassed by Jay Dyer would never sit down and dialogue with a well read Christian scholar. Most of his points are either taken out of context or dont show refutations
@@majestyhype9605
Not a fair accusation.
He mainly quotes from scholars mostly non Muslim. If you have one point that he brought that is not fair, you can bring it to light in good faith.
@@monoth4555 lmao he quotes non Muslim scholars that would say the exact same thing about Islam. why does he not mention any non Muslim scholars that write about Islam. Such as the fact that there existed tens of Kaabahs, that the story of the Miraj developed over time and the original hadiths didnt have Muhammad in Jerusalem...that the notion of hadiths is completely disregarded in scholarly reconstruction of history, that Mecca is not a historical city and did not exist till 6th century and mecca cant be found mentioned anywhere till the 8th century and isnt on a map till the 10th century....
SA: "Digging up Mecca and Medina for archeology? How dare you, don't you have any respect?!"
Also SA: "Skyscraper 100 feet away from Kaaba? Well, that sounds like a great idea!"
doubt there is much of archeologic value left in Mecca, the Wahabi started destroying much of the graves and shrines including the shrine of Fastima as early as the start of the 19th century and have continued till today.
Actually the Wahabi Saudi's destroyed more cultural heritage then IS.
Not just any skyscraper at that, it's the world's 3rd tallest building (and used to be the 2nd)! It infuriates me, how there is luxury right next to a place where you have to be modest. Would it hurt them no to build the tower right next to the Kaaba when they have cities like Ryad And Jedda.
@@kamion53 Those shrines you're talking about were built by the Ottomans. The early Islamic caliphates never built shrines over graves as it's forbidden in Islam. Hence why the so called Wahhabis destroyed it. They didn't destroy graves, they destroyed shrines.
@@xylonbanda people in Hajj need somewhere to sleep. I hate the sauds, but Mecca did need more hotel rooms, but they probably went about it the wrong way.
@@xylonbanda I'm not even Muslim and I consider the construction of a luxury hotel looming over a holy site to be blasphemous.
I think 0:18 leaves a door open for an interesting future topic..... :)
There is one person who drank the water of life and is still roaming around.
E
@@AlMuqaddimahYT I dont have a Patreon but as a viewer of your videos I hope you know that your making of these videos is a service to modern education. You have both my Subscription & my Thanks- whichever you think is more important.
🙂👍
😎👌
P.S. still looking forward to a "What *is* a 'Prophet', exactly?" 'Secular' [ history? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ] videos are sweet, but what about the theological idea about a prophet in general?
@@AlMuqaddimahYT
From research into very scientific and historical sources,
I have deduced that that person is either Queen Elizabeth or Keanu Reeves
That or there were actually two!
*Classic mystery-alien soundtrack plays*
The Man from Earth?
Your channel, as well as those of “Let’s Talk Religion,” “Esoterica,” and “Religion for Breakfast” do excellent work. I’m especially glad that I found yours. I’m a Christian myself (I often call myself a “heretical Protestant” somewhat jokingly), but I have a deep fascination with and love for the world’s many faiths and their histories. (And I especially love the mystical dimensions of religion.) Islam is a faith with which I’ve always felt an especially deep kinship, having studied it for almost twenty-two years. It’s excellent to see more Muslims engaging with Islamic history and it’s major figures, ideas, and movements. You’ve got yourself a new subscriber.
Asalaamu alaykum from an American grad student in India!
As someone who can thinks, mind me if I ask, to you.. What is a woman?
What are you waiting for to enter Islam
@@antontaraskin8727 lmaoo 😭💀
I'm so glad I found your channel! While I personally am atheist, I find the study of history and religion, psychology and sociology and how all of it is intertwined absolutely fascinating. Please keep up your amazing work ❤️
Taqiya 😄
You are weird kind of atheist but a welcome one. Keep on researching religion there no harm in it after all.
@@Melon-ALL-Free lol I know that I am weird, and I embrace my weirdness 😂.
@@eacalvert I was a hardened atheist until i tried LSD now i find atheism the most unrealistic belief lol
@@LR-kr9sz actually that's a known ... Impact...side effect...not sure of the best way to phrase it, of LSD, mushrooms, and other hallucinogens. I'll see if I can find some of the studies
I like the disclaimer that you did at the beginning. No one is going to be 100% unbiased in any research. At least we can know where you are coming from and how you set out to approach the topic. I think you did a very good job.
I am an ex-Muslim and I wish there were more Muslims who thought like him.
@@k.umquat8604 i also wished ex-muslims or any other people are like you.
@@k.umquat8604 how many rakaat are there in suratul fatiha?
@@dinbarakovic7296 I think you mean ayah. There are seven in total
@@k.umquat8604 oh ok nvm then you’re a real ex-muslim i asked it because many people fake being a ex muslim
I respect your intellectual honesty.
Not intellectual or honest
@@jiakhan not only sunnah, even Quran is. How would you explain God's words to threaten prophet's wives? ua-cam.com/video/DpQu6eCqObA/v-deo.html
@@jiakhan
Huh??
@Amperoar TY
What?
Who???
@Amperoar TY
I am just a muslim......
Does that make me khawariz????
'Prophets do not come with a sword'? At the very least Joshua, David and Solomon did.
What I know, David and Solomon are not prophets, just kings according to Judaism and Christianity. I did not read the text that was referenced in the video but I understanded it as no prophet spreads his religion by sword what Joshua did not do.
According to Jews, they were kings, not prophet
@@Shahzada1prince what about Moses? He fought the amalekites and other people around those areas and also Jesus told his disciples to sell their clothes and buy swords
I checked the wikipedia, they're all considered prophets, though David and Solomon are also kings.
ETA: all considered prophets in Judaism, not sure about Christianity.
@Arif Ahmed Khan This depends a lot on how you define "prophet". In the biblical tradition, a prophet is someone who speaks with and for God. Joshua would satisfy this, but not David or Solomon, IIRC. I don't have all the scripture memorized, but I don't recall any accounts of David or Solomon ever speaking directly with God, or having God speak directly to them, but rather they were counseled (and often rebuked, esp. in David's case) by a prophet of the time.
Hi! I am also Muslim and am a graduate student of history specialing in religious and ritual studies. Similar to you, I also had to grapple questions about my faith when I was studying and writing on the Islamicate world and reconciling it with history. Your preface made me at ease knowing that I am doing my best staying in objectivity but also staying in my faith. Thank you so much, and keep up the good work!
you got any other social media? I would like to discuss history with you.
May Allah increase our intellectual strength both in iman and worldly ilm.
Brother...
I don't understand what is the stuff that u both are talking about that u need to reconcile with ur faith?
We already know that prophet Muhammad went into wars for example and we have all the stories about him and his wars since forever .
Yes maybe we might see some violence in there but when we put everything there will be no problem!
Because violence is necessary sometimes. Like banu qurathia بنو قريظة incident if u put it in its historical context I don't see a problem with it
I have similar feelings. in the end the grey areas can only be affirmed by faith (or otherwise by renouncing it)
The more objective you become, the more you uncover, the more you rationalise, the less theistic you become.
The whole point was to view it from modern historical standards and from unbiased account, not considering Muslim authors. Comments mentioning Hadith as sources loose the point of the video. As a Muslim we all believe that the Hadith and the knowledge of it has immense merit and are true. But the objective approach demands the researcher to be outside the argument, reporting the findings on what there is, not on what he/she thinks.
May Allah guide us all and give us toufeeq, and provide us with the understanding to follow the teaching of Prophet Muhammad SAWW in the best way possible. Ameen.
Amin
Bro you do know the whole point of hadith compilations like Bukhari was for the sole purpose of academically shifting through what was authentic and what was not? Hadiths did not come 200 years after the Death of the propht pbuh, they were there since his death, books like Sahih Muslim just collected them 200 years later when paper was freely available.
Not all Muslims believe in hadith collections, check Dr. Javad Hashmi, Mufti Abu Layth and many Muslims with sunni background. And if we bring mutazila /abadi /Ismaliis things get real complicated.
Exactly!!!! So many people complaining in the comments missed the point. UNBIASED SOURCES ONLY.
@@manobik To anyone who rejects hadiths watch this
ua-cam.com/video/gwmwq2hpCtE/v-deo.html
A clear blunder at 6.40
The earliest work of hadith was the muwatta of Imam Malik (93AH- 179 AH)
He was speaking on books of Seerah not Hadith.
@@AbuIsmailFletcher Actually he was talking about the compilation of Hadith...watch from 6:20 to 6:45
@@mohamedshah5418 Oh you are right SubhanAllah. My mistake, I only started listening from 6:40 onward and missed the previous.
@@AbuIsmailFletcher barakallahu feek
Yeah I am surprised of such a simple mistake lol.
an intellectual muslim ,i hope most of muslim world debate about sensitive subjects like this ,greetings from palestine.
Bro just be an ashari. Most of the Golden age scientists were Ashari
Just be a Dhahiri, Al andalus had them in their golden age as well as in the Almohads
@@zakback9937 Haha Zahiri were an odd bunch
@@zccau2316 Dhahiri*
@@zccau2316 what zahiri still exist?
Thank you for this, I really appreciate having a place to learn about the history of Muhammad. As a Westerner, in school, we are not given any of this information, in our educational system. I really believe that it is up to us to learn about each other's cultures so we can learn to respect each other and get along better, as Earthlings.💜🙏🏻☮️
Why would you get information in your educational system about figures like Jesus or Muhammad? You probably did have some education about the religions themselves? The religions do exist, but It's not an historical fact these 'prophets' existed. So you'll probably not hear that much about it in history class..
@@jaronimo1976 I'm just astounded at how much we aren't taught, even about our own indigenous people, in school. Everything we are taught in school is from the European white man's standpoint.
@@GroovyKim I thought you were 'woke'. I was right! 😁
@@GroovyKim I almost learned everything I know about history from European males. But since white people are the native people of my country, I don't mind. 🤪
A lot of the things I know about religion, I've read in the books of Karen Armstrong. A white human.. But female though! 😇
@@GroovyKim It's great you are open to different cultures and religions. Research everything and keep the good things. Eclectic..
But you shouldn't hate white men. It makes you a racist and a sexist.
I've been a muslim myself for 3 years. Did you know in most accounts about Muhammad he is descibed as a white man? 😉
I'm sorry you have to receive hate in the comment section by being called Munafik, Murtad, etc. Keep up your good analytical work.
Funny thing is people who called other Muslim munafik usually is the actual munafik.
And don't forget about "fitnah'
Terrible if people jump to takfir or name-calling tbh. I love Al-Muqaddimah's channel and it has educated me to a whole other degree concerning Islamic history; however, he said some questionable stuff in other videos that are obviously based off orientalist beliefs.
One example is that he stated (using western English sources) that it was common for Caliphs to drink wine. Only if he knew, Islamically, how major of a statement that is--to claim a Caliph or any fellow muslim to doing a major sin without any reliable proof. Al-Mu'tadid (the Admin) states that they were excused to drink alcohol; however, there is nothing in the primary sources (of those time periods) that mention wine drinking. It only appears in the works of orientalists later on, the same works that tried to portray Caliph Al-Ma'mun as a homosexual (because he didn't fool around with the Harem women as much as others). Also, as Al-Mu'tadid rightfully mentioned, Caliphs used to lead the Friday Prayer for the muslims. Now, any muslim with a lick of knowledge in jurisprudence would know that the consuming of alcohol nullifies prayer for forty days, so how could the Caliph lead the prayer, with thousands following him, if he had drank the very previous nights?
Anyways, that is my only critique, there may be one other, concerning this account; however, perfection belongs to Allah (swt) and I hope that Al-Mu'tadid or the owner of this channel will fix this mistake.
Most of the comment section is literally just praise.
@Amperoar TY So ur saying that liberal muslims are part of the sect that killed Ali?
ehm....i think thats wrong...
I think your videos are great. I just hope you take pride in Islam’s history. I’m not a Muslim but Islam has done so much for the world. The history of Islam is so interesting! Cheers from America!
People like u are the reason, why humanity didnt die out yet.
why should ppl be proud of smtg they had no hands in, this pride in history or religion is as stupid as nationalism is
@@Yanzdorloph umm no
@@pix_d20 You're right, its stupider*
@@Yanzdorloph
Fully agreed, and people usually justify it by saying "well it drives some people to do better, to continue on with those achievements" and to that I say "might as well tell them Santa will reward them if they do that"
Just because something gives some people a positive feeling doesn't make that thing logical
big respect for researching this objectively. many times it can be frustrating how little space islam leaves for non-religious interpretation
There are plenty of Muslim researchers who are open to both religious and non-religious interpretations and ideas. From the sunni community, I can name Mohammed Hijab, Hamza Tzortzis, Omar Suleiman and many others. A researcher named Nouman Ali Khan recently did a series comparing the story of Prophet Joseph in the Bible and the Quran. Also, I follow a shi’i scholar named Sayyed Kamal Al-Haydari who studies both secular and religious, also sunni, shi’i, sufi etc, sources. It’s too bad his lectures are only in Arabic and aren’t translated yet. You would have a hard time finding them because main stream academia promotes only the conservative and strict scholars. That goes for christianity and atheism as well.
I don't think you've been paying attention to all the academic research that has been going on about Islam and Islamic history for a long time.
Edit: This research is being/has been carried out by Western secular academics. However you're not gonna find their work with flashy UA-cam videos. You gotta pick up a few books.
Yes that’s true, but I personally think it’s because us Muslims believe that the Quran was a direct source from Allah himself, and therefore it is good to not disagree with it, as it increases our faith
"Non-religious ", every and each conquered area and people were assimilated in Islam and Muslims. All research was started by translating Greek and Latin works into Arabic and Persian.
@@jun2011jh Because people were converting to Islam, so of course they would change their language to the language that part of their belief is tied to(the language of the Quran) and also Jews and Christians were allowed to live peacefully (Andalusia)
- What about the letter written by prophet Muhammad to the ruler of Rome?
- What about the letter written by the king of Sri Lanka to prophet Muhammad pbuh which only arrived at the time of Abubakr Ra?
What about the king of Kerala India who met prophet Muhammad pbuh and embraced islam after witnessing the moon being split?
Nobody outside of muslim tradition thinks that any of those are authentic. Not even all scholars of muslim faith. None of the evidence from the Hadiths of elsewhere can even be dated close to the time it is supposed to have happened.
The example of the Sri Lankan kings's letter "arriving late" is sort of hilarious. You mean, almost as if produced by somebody who would have known Muhammad only from hearsay?
@@helpIthinkmylegsaregone if you lived that far away how woukdnt you hear about him by people talking about him
@@Tsordd You wouldn't. My point was that that's not really good evidence for Muhammad's life itself. The person couldn't verify or falsify anything.
@@helpIthinkmylegsaregone oh the evidemce for his life part. Yeah thats not good evidemce. For all someone couldve known it could be a arabian mythological character that the people heard about
@@Tsordd no, Muhammad (saw) was a real historical figure
Glad to see you’re back! And tackling a subject I’ve often wondered about (admittedly as a non-Muslim) as well! I know Tom Holland discusses the historicity of Muhammad, but I especially appreciate someone approaching the topic with an actual background in Islam. Keep up the great work as always, friend!
Wait, when did Tom Holland talk about this?
@@HR-in1dm In his 2012 book “In the Shadow of the Sword”, he talked a great deal about the origins of Islam and the historical context for Muhammad and the Arabs’ rise in 600s AD.
@@RavingCelt009 😅 I thought you meant Tom Holland the actor that played Spider-Man, thanks
@@HR-in1dm I was bamboozled as well
@@RavingCelt009 I wouldn't take that book as facts if I was you, it had many other scholars saying that its filled with nonesense, both from western scholars and muslim ones
Even as a Christian, I have utmost respect for Muhammad and those who follow his teachings. Much love to you, thank you for making such an informative video!
🤝
You shouldn't have "upmost respect" for a murderer slave owner and above all else a paedophile who married a 6 year old and consummated his marriage at 9
@@hgg219 Go read your bible(numbers 31:18) before lying about Islam lmao
@@hgg219
You have ignored the fact that such marriage in such age in such era was a natural matter, therefore it is clear that you are not criticizing the early marriage of a nine-year-old girl to a fifty-year-old man as much as you are keen to criticize and distort the picture of the prophet of Islam peace and blessings of Allah be upon him - and instigate others against him.
Accordingly, this undermines your credibility and unveils your false human feelings and malicious intentions under the pretext of defending the rights of woman. if you were really seeking denouncing such marriage, they should have spoken about such marriage as a general phenomenon which appeared before Islam and continued after it and would not focus their criticism on one person as if he was the one who invented such marriage or the first one who applied it or the only one who did it. prophet Muhammad - peace and blessings of Allah be upon him - was born in a society in which early marriage was something ordinary and natural, therefore, he married the way others did. moreover, his enemies, who tried to kill him, did not use such marriage as a pretext to distort his picture or instigate against him because it was an ordinary matter in such era.
The marriage in early ages was prevailing in Europe itself, especially the early marriage of kings and rulers in the twelfth century for the purpose of creating alliances guaranteeing the continuity of peace. An example for that is the empress Anias, in France, the wife of two Byzantine Emperors: Emperor Alexius Kamanis II, and the Emperor Andronikos Kamanos I, respectively.
According to (William of Tyre), Anias was just eight years old when she reached Constantine while Alexios was thirteen years old (1). Moreover, the wife of Alexios Kamanos I was twelve years old when she married and became an empress before attaining fifteen years. As for the empress of Byzantium Theodora the wife of Manwel, she was thirteen years old when she married the Prince of Jerusalem Baldwin III moreover, Margret Maria Hingaria married Izak Anglos II when she was nine years.
Also put in mind she reach and finished puberty making her by definition not a child(pre-pubescent) Read
sahih Bukhari 476.
The definition of a P3d0 is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. I proven she was not a Child
(pre-pubescent) and her being a Adult whilst her age being young was possible during that time.
Salam
There are many restrictions that I don’t agree with in Islam, but as a Christian myself as well, I give my respects. 🙏
Long comment warning.....
After finishing the video, I think you are very dismissive of hadith reports on his life, yes most of the original hadith records were physically lost, but that ignores the fact the main way of transmitting books at the time was oral, and since thousands of students would memorise the hadiths from the original author, even if some got some of it wrong when recording it in a book, the error would be found quickly when comparing it with other sources, Abdullah bin omar recorded hadiths during the lifetime of the prophet, many of which his servant nafi' learned, and malik bin anas was a student of nafi', so only two men came before him when he recorded hadiths in his book al-muatta'(I've butchered the spelling) and he wasn't the first one to record hadith, many earlier sources recorded it, yes the original records are gone, but again physical writing down of books was considered a secondary way of saving them, memorising them was the main way, and because thousands of people did it, the chances a mistake would go unnoticed are low, especially how the prophet promised severe punishment for those who lie on his behalf, people were afraid of making mistakes when writing those hadiths down, and all the narrators of authentic hadith are known people who scholars of hadith know their names, background, knowledge, capacity for memorisation, throughout a very detailed process, even if it wasn't 100% correct, dismissing it would be like dismissing any record on Alexander the great's life because all surviving records are after his time and all of them were written by his successors who needed political legitimacy so they obviously didn't give a very accurate record, but that doesn't mean we can just dismiss it and say we know nothing about his life
Right, The hadiths are the more reliable source of History ever. and it's one pf the major sciences of the Islamic religion.
@@yusufazad4796 Please be sarcasm.
100% Accurate. Only difference being that people actually spent the time to filter through the dodgy narrations thousands of years ago for the life of the Prophet(SAW)
@@heyyo6050 yes there are, same with prophet Mohammed, but the literal physical record doesn't exist, there are some inscriptions which do still exist, same with prophet Mohammed, but anything that talks about his life, his childhood, his battels, all are either sources that came later, or sources from his time, but the only surviving ones are copies not the original physical record
@@heyyo6050 "they are not hahaha so dumb" feels good to dismiss stuff you know absolutely nothing about if you know the rigourous criteria that need to be met for a hadith to be called authentic you would be shocked no instead satisfied with your belly full of that sweet ignorance you laugh. I feel sad for you and hope your openmindedness in other areas will be of use when you hear facts regarding religious matters too.
i am here after Usefull chart mention this channel. Thank You for giving us proves from scientific and historical side about the life of Prophet Mohammad
Although I am not a Muslim, I do believe that Muhammad existed. I would be rather shocked if he did not exist. As for the accounts of what all happened in his life, it would be interesting to know what is and is not true about his actual life.
@@آدمبرانسي One has to take a leap of faith though when it comes to the supernatural aspects of his story and whether or not you believe that such things are possible. For example, one can believe that Muhammad existed without also believing that angels exist.
@@halaldunya918 It would be really interesting to know who these various religious figures really were as I only see a few possibilities for any religious prophet. If we assume that a religious prophet existed, are we limited to the following interpretations of his life? 1) That this person really had some kind of divine connection. 2) That the person genuinely believed that he had a divine connection but was mistaken in that belief for whatever reason, be it having been manipulated by others, the result of drug use, mental illness, etc. 3) That the person was deliberately lying about their prophetic or messianic role to gain influence over others for nefarious purposes. 4) That the person was deliberately lying about their prophetic or messianic role for what he believed to be a greater good.
@@آدمبرانسي I do wonder what if any supernatural occurrences are real.
@@آدمبرانسي Okay.
@@آدمبرانسي The question if Muhammad existed?
To the people in the comments
*Be respectful*
You don't even need to agree just don't be a jerk.
You deserve a title "The Fair"
Finally, someone with common sense.
Thanks👍, but he neglected a lot of Evidences. good video though, but not reliable it seems
Lmao funny coming from *edge lord*
I did not see any "jerk" comments, people are civil for the most part. All it seems is that you are trying to create/amplify non-existent/niche-minority "jerk" comments, which perhaps has to do with your preconceived notions that you are projecting here.
I was sent here by Useful Charts. It was worth it
I was sent here by Allah... or algorithm... or both. I dunno.
Does it make sense that taking only *non-muslim* sources to account and ignoring all Muslim sources? Logically It doesn't to me. Why would I look for references in sources where Muhammad wasn't? It's like trying to find oxygen in Mars when you already know there's no oxygen in Mars. In fact, Muslim souces are most reliable compared to all non-muslim sources as Muslim sources contain rich literature.
I do not think you understand. I will attempt to explain. Suppose you wanted find out if Moses existed. The jews would point to their ancient scrolls and the Torah. Of course they have evidence to present. Moses is a central figure in THEIR religion. So there is built in bias here. But what if you found a clear citing of the name of Moses on an Egyptian tablet or on the wall of an ancient Egyptian tomb that had been sealed for over 4000 years?
Now you have evidence not shrouded in Jewish tradition and religion. This evidence seems more corroborative because it is impartial, not subject to Jewish bias.
That is why evidence of Muhammad OUTSIDE Islam would be more desirable.
Think about it. You are looking for the historical existence not religious. It’s called Bias. Not saying all Muslims would lie or embellish but Muslims are just human after all. Humans cannot be trusted. You need someone who doesn’t care at all if he existed or not, doesn’t matter to them at all, they are reported what they saw. It’s easy to understand. Would you believe a Christian writing about Christ Jesus or a non Christian writing about Jesus more. I would. Same with any historical figure like kings and pharaohs.
You have to keep in mind these people are enemies of Allah
True...
The idea is that non-Muslim sources would not be biased in favour the way that Muslim sources would. So if you have a non-Muslim source saying one thing, and a Muslim source says the same thing or doesn't contradict it, we can assume it's true to a standard that would satisfy non-Muslims too.
Who's here after watching the video on Moses?
Me too
And the one on Jesus too. Very interesting collaboration! All well done.
Me
@@MuricaTurkey which video?
In UsefulCharts's video he outlined the historical method where the most compelling evidence would be personal artifacts or works from the subject historical figures. It's a bit disappointing that this is not applied uniformly to the video series, and you pretty much skipped right to the third option. As others have pointed out, Muhammad PBUH has dispatched diplomatic correspondence to both Rome and Persia, with His seal, and those still exists.
Exactly. There are a number of his letters still preserved. And the physical evidence of existence can't be ruled out this easily. Artifacts, clothes, swords, and other things related directly to him still exists. And his grave's location is well known and not speculated.
@@UnusualxD Sure and Christians have pieces of the cross, nails and the Cup Jesus drank from, Not.
All presumed "artifacts" left by prophet Muhamed, are not tested, not by lack of trying, permission to do so was not granted.
The Muslims deemed it inappropriate to “examine” it. Even saudi don’t allow any excavation in makkah or medina.
@@santokun5835 They are scared it may reveal that he lied.
The first hadith collection was done by imam malik.Imam malik was born in 93 A.H and died in 179A.H so not after 200years!He even met nafi was an ex slave of hazrat abdullah bin umer who was the son of hazrat umer.The writing of the hadith collection by imam malik had been started at around 163A.H.
This is the problem.... He somehow missed these Sources.🙏
And he dismissed going into the science of hadeeth collection. The strength of the memory of the Arabs, the rigorous testing of hadith b4 they were accepted or even when written how they were graded according to their authenticity. How literally every authentic hadeeth has a chain of narrators going back to the prophet SAW and how studying these narrators and their reliability is a science of its own which became well established not long after the death of the Prophet
@@zahraaghaswala This my friend is called post-colonial inferiority complex where a person only finds stuff written by the westerners as reliable.Sad reality.Our sahih hadith have chains going back to the Prophet(PBUH).Whereas western writtings on average rarely have chains going back to a specific person
I suspect it wasn't included because it wasn't a history of Muhammad life. But writings on Islamic law.
@@ZombieBraintrust Whoever has studied hadith knows that it contains Islamic laws and Islamic practices but ALSO about the life of the Prophet.There are so many event of the Prophet present in muwatta of imam malik which was the first hadith collection.Also in other sahih hadith so yeah I dont think that is the reason bro
That's why I love your work!
I'm a Hindu but I try to learn about Abrhamanic religions.
Your are by far most balanced source for Islam's history
Mashaallah 😘😘 MUHAMMAD ﷺ (peace be upon him) is the best human in the world 😍😘
Islam is the most beautiful religion in the world 😍😍.proud to be muslim
In a country like India where Islam is often vilified and demonised by politicians, we need more objective Scholarship to understand the actual history and philosophy of Islam ☪️ . After all 2 billion people follow this religion.
@@ProfessorJack_IIM Mashaallah 😘😘 MUHAMMAD ﷺ (peace be upon him) is the best human in the world 😍😘
Islam is the most beautiful religion in the world 😍😍.
PROUD to be MUSLIM😌😌😇😇
MUSLIM means, (submit the will to god(allah),.)
Always Remember The roots of sanatan Dharma is Curiosity
And Debate to find Answer of the questions and To find More Questions
Never have the sheep mentality that some xyz guy who made his son Divorce his wife in order to satisfy his lust have answers to everyrhing
@@rambhaktkushmakar no that is not what happened. However, lets discuss Brahma n his daughter lust, how do you feel about that?
Haven't watched the video yet but you made it, therefore it's good, also, you are finally back! Let's goooo!
@@imanatafridi7212 cool story bro, you really good with fiction stories, I know kids usually have a big imagination where they imagine bukhari said something he didn't, and imagine abu dawood said something he didn't say, kids and their imagination, also how will jesus punish every Muslim ever when he couldn't even defend himself against some Jewish soldiers, a god who can't defend himself from being literally killed then crucified is no threat to me.
@@imanatafridi7212 it’s amazing how non muslims try to tarnish Islam with hilariously and utterly false claims. You mentioned Jesus, so I’m guessing that you also know about the Biblical story in which Lot impregnates both his daughters! Genesis 19:30 to 19:37. Have fun explaining that
@@Goodguy507 As a universalist, I doubt that all Muslims will be punished. But all humans will be judged. Sorry for the weirdo attacking you though. He's a vocal minority.
Your attack on Christianity however utterly fails.
A willing sacrifice for the sake of many isn't the same as fighting. This is similar to a strawman. You misrepresent the crucifixion as a failed rebellion (Jesus wasn't as violent as Mohamed. Even Muslims should grant that The Prophet Isa was peaceful) when in reality it was a simple means to an end. This end being the salvation of humanity.
Jesus was Pacifistic and had no intention of harming his creations. Why would a pacifist fight against a willing sacrifice? Why would a Father harm his ignorant and angry kids whom he knows doesn't know any better?
It's like saying you have no respect for a fire fighter who sacrificed his life to save people from a fire because he died in it by willingly putting his life on the line.
This is a misunderstanding of Christian Theology on your part.
Granted, I don't hold to fast to penal substitution as I'm far more a fan of Christus Victor.
By Christs resurrection, he has permanently defeated death.
That at least calls for grand praise. Hence, the Christian's believe and hope.
Let us agree to respect each others religions.
@@monarchblue4280 He never classified Jesus' crucifixion as a failed rebellion. Simply that as per your bible, God was humiliated by pagans. God the ALL MIGHTY. He can not be humiliated.
"Jesus wasn't as violent as Muhhamed."
If you Believe Jesus is literally God, then this is false. God punishes people severely and orders his followers to violently attack his enemies in the Old Testament.
" Why would a Father harm his ignorant and angry kids whom he knows doesn't know any better? "
In all Abrahamic traditions, God literally floods the entire world to punish the Corrupt. The cities of Sodom and Gomorrah are smited for their wickedness. Humanity DOES know better because they received revelation from God. They cannot claim ignorance.
@@imanatafridi7212 Jospeh married Mary when she was 12 or 13. Was he a Saint of Satan?
As a muslim I respect your honesty . Because if you a real muslim you should be honest about everything even your religion
Thank you for sharing this knowledge
I firmly believe in Allah His existence..
Prophet Muhammad was Divinely guided as a servant & messenger of his Lord.
ﷺ
Alhamdulilah❤
Great video! It’s wonderful to see Muslims interested in the history of their faith from a non-apologetic perspective. It sound like a really exciting project.
What about the letters of the Prophet (s.a.w.) that he sent to the different rulers of his time? I feel like those should have been mentioned in a video like this.
They are not proven to be real. More like propaganda made up by later Muslims.
@@siddave549 that's no true. Do your research.
@@naimhasan7416 I have. Those letters are bullshit. All made up BS.
@Ateeba Kamran just ignore him. They don't have anything so concrete in their religion - or whatever B.S. he believes in now... Most of them are miserable atheists now.
do you really think he wouldn't include the letters if they existed? He's literally a Muslim and he would dig himself into anything that would prove Muhammad was real.
Even if the letters existed no one is allowed to do any dating to make sure they are not forgeries.
I never expected a Muslim to post this. Good work boss!
There is no Rishi or Prophet of any religion in the world, whose entire history is available to us. But about Prophet Muhammad, even the begrudging Christian historian professor Hitti, had to acknowledge that *he was the only one of the world prophets to be born within the full light of history."*
- History of the Arabs (chapter 8, page 3)
@ZebraZ Muhammed wasn't homophopic he's just Delivering God's message
@ZebraZ Go back to school kid
@Gente dernak No hes Sunni Hanafi
@@peakhumanchannel
To School where evolution is taught?
I'm christian and I subbed. You are gold!
Welcome so sign here to be converted
@@shohaibnawaz4432
He likes the video because it is against Mohammed (PBUH)....
@@modayshwood9415 it's not
@@omarhab3689 how its not man he is saying whole video against Prophet,man dont be so dumb
@@ii-pg8ns he is literally proving how Mohammed existed
How is that against Islam ?
As a muslim, i dont understand how u can be called munafiq or murtad for this. Its very informative :D also watched ur vid about the quran and its versions. Theyre all interesting.
Allah is fictional character and so may be pedophile mohammad who rode on donkey to moon 🌙and split it into two and those who question bull shit in quran are Atheist or murtad
You know all this is fake …
@@chrispanda21 how? you call this detailed documentary fake?
As an atheist, I would like to know what those words memes
@@KonaduKofi slurs for non believer or idol worship or altering islam
Prophet Muhammed: "The Ummah in the End Times are better than you because they'll believe in me without ever having seen me"
Prophet Muhammad obviously existed,
Proof?
There are so many descendants of prophet Muhammad
Example?
Sultan Abdullah II (Jordan)
Sultan Brunei
Sultan Kelantan (Malaysia)
Sultan Perlis (Malaysia)
And many many more !!
@@zahraaghaswala here mate
Never heard of this and seriously doubt it.
@@burningphoneix just do a little research
@@hazleenazlee506
I am sure you have proof of adam too. And you know adam's birthday also
وَقَالَ صلى الله عليه وسلم: (الْبَخِيلُ مَنْ ذُكِرْتُ عِنْدَهُ فَلَمْ يُصَلِّ عَلَيَّ💓💓💓🌴🌴
والتحدث لم يذكر مرة واحدة الصلاة على خير الخلق صل الله عليه وسلم....
👍الراوي منافق يدعي الإسلام ويخفي الحقد والكره👍
The Prophet (ﷺ) said: "The miser is the one in whose presence I am mentioned yet does not pray for Allah's blessings upon me."Reference:At-Tirmidhi 5/551 and others. See also Al-Albani, Sahih At-Tirmidhi 3/177 and Sahihul-Jarai' As-Saghir 3/25.
Should mention the utmost care of filtering hadith (Sahih, dhaif, munkar, maudhu.. etc). Probably the most quoted person in history, how can some people doubt he existed.
Yeah lol like what how can you say he never lived
I don't think people say he didn't exist, just if you're not a Muslim you don't believe he was a prophet.
@@nakkadu Nope, if you watch the video, or any related videos, it was his existence questioned. Usually because lack of record outside religious traditions or outside arabia.
Which kinda hard cause any report of his speech or doing, considered as religious rules, and the rest of the world kinda ignore arabia at that time.
@@finhas8865 Most non-religious people realise all the stories about flying horses and moon splitting are made up, but willingly accept some guy called Mohamed existed - it's not an important enough claim to argue with.
The muhammad of Islam is what we find skepticism.
I love how this channel despite being Islamic but still brave to ask uncomfortable questions.
What about the those letters whose send to the different rulers in Arab region by Prophet M SAW in his own life
Damn, your right. This needs to be upvoted
He apparently considers all muslim sources inauthentic and chooses to take sources from the enemies of Islam like Byzantium ect
@@Adem-gz4uh I really think so because according to by enlarge these so called liberal Muslims if west recognize our genuine and true struggle for our faith and our true Muslim history then they believe and accept this then what kind of morality exists in this liberal leprosy class
There's a lot of lack of historical criticism in your assumption. Several letters that have been attributed to Paul or Peter in the NT for centuries are now dismissed as authentics by the majority of Christian scholars
@@joaquim64rodrigues just because of this we assume that they not actually exist or these are just a imaginary characters remember that the whole Muslim nations and the existence Islam is only based on the existence of Muhammed (SAW) he is only foundation of Islam
He existed.
Samir Dizco the Peace agreement with his seal on it
@Samir Dizco there's a grave.
@Samir Dizco Have yot watched the video?
I'm not Muslim and I agree he existed
I mean every religions founder must be exist.
You deserve fresh baked bread everyday. Thank you for the video
Ikr. I can barely get fresh roti everyday and I have to make it myself. :'(
@@AlMuqaddimahYT 😹😹
@@AlMuqaddimahYT According to Doctrina Jacobi, did not Muhammad (salaa allah ealayh wasalam) live? please help me !🥺 Isn't the person mentioned in Doctrina Jacobi the same person as our Prophet?
@@AlMuqaddimahYT the first mention of the prophet comes only 2 years after the prophets death? So you take European sources to when he is mentioned but ignore his Arab companions? Why because they weren’t white? How do you ignore the science of hadeeth and the preservation of history through the Arabs but acknowledge how Europeans preserved history from a thousand years ago? This is a joke some straight up inferior type of thinking clearly all your teachers are non Muslim Europeans.
@@Islam.is.the.truth.. because the islamic sources need to be verified because they're biased, which he cannot do. While if there are Bezyntine records or persian records or records from any other nation it means that he most definitely existed as these nations have no reason to lie or fabricate things about Muhammad.
Another thing is that how do you say that a lot of people choose to worship Allah and Muhammad? Are these people really choosing? Or are these people indoctrinated since birth however and brainwashed to believe a certain way and if they start to actually look at it scientifically and see how they have to follow blindly and literally submit because the Quran says to submit that means basically be a slave to this religion because that’s all you know as a child and if you do question any of it you possibly could be killed and you will definitely lose your family and friends and be ostracized because of it so really is that a choice are these people really choosing or is It purely being indoctrinated and brainwashed since birth and it has repeated so many generations that your kids and your kids kids will be enslaved and indoctrinated and brainwashed into Islam without a choice like you said before you said millions of people choose to worship but are they really? Religion is control religion is brainwashing and religion is relentless and having your own choice and thinking for yourself within a gigantic group cult religion whatever you wanna call it is always looked down upon. Follow the herd or go against the herd is The reality of ☪️
What about those Letters send by Prophet Muhammad S.A.W to kings and rulers outside Peninsular Arab in year 6 Hijrah inviting them to Islam signed by him
As well as the documented treaties
Yes that is really an important proof. There are many.
I don't know why he ignored many other factors and also moving on just by a silly mention on Hadiths, and neglecting the many other records, seems like covering up all these or what! Idk.....
His way of presentation & overall Work is Great but that doesn't make it True. Gotta be careful on his works.
and the mention of him in hindu books
@@tahahussain5708 which book is that
Waching all these collab videos about jesus, moses and muhammad as atheist with respect. All these videos are very interesting. Good job.
Loads of Mohammads exist, I've met several.
lmao
@VP ZukuWait, my real name is also Mohammad .
My dads name is Mohammed, my brother Ahmed and loads of my uncles cousins and relatives aswells. I'm a teacher in Iraq. Quarter of Each class I teach has students who's name is Mohammed another quarter Ali.
As a former Muslim, i had three choices to consider.
1- Mohamad did not exist , in which case Islam would be false
2-Mohamad did exist and the Quran is revealed to him.
3- To read the Quran and evaluate it for myself.
I decided to go with choice # 2 & 3.
Conclusion: After reading the Quran , i came to the conclusion that there’s no way that God is the author of the Quran.
Surahs 33:50, 24:61, 9:29, 64:17, 5-101,14:4, 33:56,4:24 , etc… were enough for me to leave Islam. Now, devout muslims try to use the tactic i call “ the miracle of reinterpretation “ to say , oh , you don’t know the meaning of this verse , or you don’t speak Arabic ( like , why would the God of the universe would wanna send a scripture in a language that’s only spoken by 5 % of the population?)..
Talking about the "science" behind the hadith, it's criteria and how it was compiled could be an intresting subject for a video.
@På Luffen those are called Quranists and they are borderline not muslims...
@På Luffen how in the world can you follow the sunna without the hadith ? Sunna is exclusively existing in the ahadith.
@På Luffen dude, I don't know what crazy muslim friends you have but there is no sunni muslim who will tell you that ahadith are fake. Plus I don't know of any historien who claims that the last prophet didn't exist, this is even worse than flat earth conspiracy theorists...
@På Luffen and just to clarify since you seem to be confused but any one who reject all the ahadith are Quranist by definition, anybody who follow the ahadith are sunni by definition. Unless you belong to a specific sect that have a different methodology in filtering ahadith (theological one and not historical) like shiaa.
Edit: spelling.
@På Luffen yes and there is hundreds of books filled with them. But there is also authentic ahadith. And yes I’m sunni.
As a non-Abrahamic individual, I really loved this series as it deals with the questions with carefully analyzed facts, figures, and logic, rather than focusing on faith and speculation.
Kudos to you for being able to stay objective and not giving in to your personal beliefs. Keep up the good work.
a hindu, i suppose?
I'd like to know more about Muhammad now. Thank you for doing this Collab. I waited for this and it was worth it.💖😸
If you are interested dr Yasir qadhi has great biography of him that you can easily find on UA-cam. Type seerah of prophet by yasir qadhi. Very detailed and also talks about sources that are used for his life
@På Luffen nah not really he's a reformist
Ah great to hear there's loads of sources to learn from and I'd recommend UA-cam by watching Islamic videos on Muhammad
@På Luffen then.... He legit isn't Muslim
@På Luffen that's not all it takes to be Muslim just shows you know little about islam
Belief is personal and I am so glad you approached your belief and your scholarship
This was an amazing video! As one of the”liberal Christians” you mentioned, and an ordained minister, and an academic I am thrilled to see someone doing this! That takes a lot of dedication, and I would imagine, some bravery. Is there any historical analysis of the Quran, or any resources out there equivalent to The Jesus Seminar, or the Search for the historical Muhammad?
Any recommendations would be welcome.
'Mythvision podcast' deals with the historicity of muhammed in detail,it's basically the same thing here but much more brief
6:34 you claimed hadith date back to the 9th century, the Sahifah Hammam ibn Munabbih was written before 101H the authors date of death (early 8th century)
Musannaf of Ibn Jurayj was written before 150H (8th century) and the hadiths it contains are also in Musannaf of Abd al-Razzaq which was written before 211H
He's a MUNAFIQ
Prophet Muhammad said to speak the truth and that you did.
@@iceinmyveins998 his method is neither objective nor neutral because it relies on a naturalist method.
He tried to immunise himself from critique by playing the victim card and depicting his critics as unintellegent and uninformed brutes.
He made the false statement that hadith were only composed 200 years after the death of the Prophet.
He depicted everything from Muslim as biased whereas citation from enenemies of Islam and competing religions are according to him unbiased.
He dismisses the offspring of the Prophet and so.
On reading the title, I thought it's going to be a regular Islamophobic video. But I was wrong! Good work indeed. I explored your channel, it's amazing + u earned a sub!
MachaAllah! Thank you for the censoring first at 5:35 and some other later on..:)
it is offensive, the rules of islam do not apply here
read muhamed cartoons, to compensate
@@worfoz That's subjective and on common ground arguable whether it's offensive or not, actually it shouldn't be offensive to you and the reason is simple, we don't know how did the Prophet (peace be upon him)actually look like so any depiction would not reflect the reality which in your case whether depicted or not wouldn't benefited you in some way while for us Muslims it is offensive because not only it does not and could not represent the real Prophet of Islam (peace be upon him) it then add to the disrespect that could be done onto his character which you may not grasp and that's your value not ours. However, allow me to ask you why would it be offensive to you? My take is that the only reason you claim it is offensive is because somehow you feel like your liberty of expression is being repressed or that your value is not given a priority, wouldn't you agree with that? And if you do, aren't you then claiming some sort of privilege over us? And please give a valid reason why you ought to be privileged if you assume so.
Came to see the video before the inevitable backlash. You are brave to try to explain this.
I am already nervous. This subject will piss off some people big time.
This guy obviously time travelled from the golden age of Islam. He certainly has all the traits are long lost among Muslims such as as criticising, research, neutral approach the matters of religion. Respect!
True but we do research a lot
I like this collaboration. Thank you.
Always good to see a new video from you, I swear I learn something new with each video! I commend your approach with this subject and your ability to take a objective approach to it.
I hope you have a good day man and keep making these awesome videos!
This series was enjoyable and very informative. It's a shame that you're getting hate for your installment in the comments from who don't understand how historical methodology is done. They appear to just be the vocal minority based on the like and dislike ratio. I'm definitely subscribing to your channel because you cover very interesting topics and you try your best to be unbiased.
This was beautifully made , I'm really impressed . also appreciate you're objectivity tremendously
Beautiful video! Well done! :-)
ve4ry disrespectful top REAL religions like christianity and judaism
islam is racism, this ideology is the enemy of mankind and Human Rights
I really admire your objectivity. I am an American that has been living in Islamic countries for 17 years and as you know, most believers dare not consider anything outside standard dogma. Unconventional thinking or discussions can barely take place among people. It is so sensitive spiritually to most Muslims that any intellectual mentions can start an angry encounter. There is no off-path discussions allowed for most. I found you from Let‘s Talk Religion and I have happily subscribed. Thank you. Jude of Egypt
I'm incredibly amazed at both the honesty and sensibility of the disclaimer and of the sources presented.
A lot about Islam ends up being ignored or made to fit notions of religion in the Jewish or Christian senses, and that can end up creating some nonexistent parallels while real connections are considered too complex to teach at a public school level. This channel fixes that, at least for me.
Wow great video! You did a really good job presenting the evidence in an unbiased way and I learned a lot. Thanks!
I came across this channel after watching the Sana'a Manuscript video and have enjoyed your informative videos.
All I have to say is you don't have to qualify about giving historical information by pronouncing that you are approaching the topic in a "secular" or "liberal" manner. After all critical thinking is a very large part of why Islamic empires produced so much work on philosophy and logic.
“Prophets doesn’t come with a sword” well,what about moses,joshua,david,ezekiel,samuel and solomon..like even jesus in matthew 10:34 said:”"Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.” And he said in luke 19:27:”But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them--bring them here and kill them in front of me.'"
muhamed was not a prophet, read your quran
he was a child rapist, read your ahadith
@@worfoz Quran says:”we sent you,O prophet mohamed but as a mercy to all the creatures (21:107).In another verse it says:”And indeed, you are of a great moral character”(68:4)...n many verses like that..According to us,this Quranic verses are from God and the hadith is the words of the prophet peace be upon him...anyway,i feel like you have an excessive hate towards islam bro...prophet mohamed can’t rape a person😢he never even slapped or shouted on his wives or servants..Our beloved aisha and he’s servant zayd ibn malik said so...they said,he was very humble and cheerful and if we asked for something he gave us all what he had...His companions like abubakr and Umar said that prophet mohamed transform in battles,from a person as gentle and shy as a virgin in her wedding to a lion in the battlefield who isn’t scared of death..but not to be offensive bible has many sexual abuse verses..i’ll not show you the worst but i’ll give you one that i’ve read yesterday...according to numbers 31:17 it says that moses said:” Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man,but save for yourselves every little girl who has never slept with a man.”
@@ademjrad9994 Yes, that proves that your book is man made and corrupt
but I already know that
muhamed was not a muslim, the CURSED name of this child rapist is not mentioned in your man made quran
@@worfoz what an ignorant😂😂the name mohamed was mentioned five times in the quran and we literally have a hole chapter called “mohamed”...insult him,as you like,it will not change nothing but just the possession of the devil over you..indeed,you’ll die and no one will care abt you,but the prophet pbuh is loved and followed by 1.9 billion persons and was chosen as the greatest man in the world by michael hart in the guiness..anyway,you said that the quran is man made...well look at this..quran said that it will come a time when the romans will be weaker than the persians,they will be defeated in the first two battles but they will win the last one in the lowest point on earth and all this exactly happened after 7 years..quran said that the asphyxiated body of ramsis 2 will not vanish and will be found in the futur as a sign for the nonbelievers and it was found in 1978 and the historian that looked into the dead body,Maurice bucaille became Muslim after being agnostic.the prophet said that it will come a time when barefooted arabs will compete in highest buildings and that they will build the highest building in the world and it happened in 2011(burj khalifa)..and he said that it’s a minor sign of the end of times..he also said that it will come a time when someone will make up a lie and this lie will reach far est and west in the afternoon and that’s happening now in socialmedia..an account with big followers can make up a lie in morning and it will reach far est n west in the afternoon..wanna more evidence??”which of the favors of your lord would you deny”(Quran 55:13)
There is only Muhammad peace be upon him exist in this world after Allah almighty , no one else..
Christians say the same about Jesus 🤔 very interesting
@@TracyD2 we also believe in jesus and is honoured in Islam well loved and respected ❤unlike Judaism and Christianity
@Al Muqaddimah
you said in 7:54 "we have no idea how for instance the Umayyads thought about the Prophet's life"
yes we know
the Umayyads Dynasty continued in Andalusia (Spain) for 8 centuries, if Abbasids change history in the east then the Umayyads would know and had another version which never happened
Well done. One of the better analysis I have seen.
Out of the three videos, I have the most respect for this video as the honesty and effort to be objective could be argued to be more difficult for the creator.
3:00 What about letters of the Prophet and the older Quran Mushaf.?
ik he ignored them
I don't know why he ignored many other factors and also moving on just by a silly mention on Hadiths, and neglecting the many other records, seems like covering up all these or what! Idk.... .
ua-cam.com/video/fMJRsd8SrhU/v-deo.html watch this you will get answer about the older mushaf
@@rabiaadam lol,😂 Are you recommending the video of JAY SMITH... who was debunked by Muslim Historian Adnan Rashid..., All he sticks to is twisted narratives according to his anti-muslim agenda..Stay away frm his content, If you r seeking knowledge
Can you please share link to Adnan rashid rebuttal?
One of the most interesting 7th century accounts about Prophet Muhammad comes from Sebeos who was a Bishop of the House of Bagratunis.
Sebeos is the first non-Muslim author to present us with a theory for the rise of Islam that pays attention to what the Muslims themselves thought they were doing:
*At that time a certain man from along those same sons of Ishmael, whose name was Mụhammad, a merchant, as if by God's command appeared to them as a preacher and the path of truth. He taught them to recognize the God of Abraham, especially because he was learnt and informed in the history of Moses. Now because the command was from on high, at a single order they all came together in unity of religion. Abandoning their vain cults, they turned to the living God who had appeared to their father Abraham. So, Muhammad legislated for them: not to eat carrion, not to drink wine, not to speak falsely, and not to engage in fornication. He said: 'With an oath God promised this land to Abraham and his seed after him for ever. And he brought about as he promised during that time while he loved Israel. But now you are the sons of Abraham and God is accomplishing his promise to Abraham and his seed for you. Love sincerely only the God of Abraham, and go and seize the land which God gave to your father Abraham. No one will be able to resist you in battle, because God is with you.*
*- R. G. Hoyland, Seeing Islam As Others Saw It: A Survey And Evaluation Of Christian, Jewish And Zoroastrian Writings On Early Islam, 1997, p. 129*
We can see that Sebeos knows plenty of personal information about Prophet Muhammad. For example, he is aware that Muhammad was a merchant by profession before his Prophethood. He hints that his life was suddenly changed by a divinely inspired revelation.
He presents a good summary of Prophet Muhammad's preaching i.e belief in One God and Abraham as a common ancestor of Jews and Arabs. He even picks out some of the prohibitions which are mentioned in the Qur'an, such as false speech and drinking of alcohol.
All this information that Sebeos presents accurately conforms to the Islamic traditions. Many take such detailed, early and accurate accounts about Prophet Muhammad for granted but it's actually quite rare with figures from ancient history.
Are you historian?
so this proves the existence of prophet Muhammad peace be upon him from even a non Muslim side
@@muhammadhussain5854 do Muslims not say Muhammed could not read? This source says he was a learned man.
@@markorbit4752 well we believe he learned this from god
@@maganhassan2627 could he read or not? I don't care how he learned to read. I just want to know if he could read or not
Thank you so much for taking the time and making the hard effort to make these objective, rational videos about your tradition and faith.
It would be nice to watch a video on the “the seven sleepers” per Judaic narrative and Quranic narrative (ashab al kahf ).
We have a Roman account about that story too.
i have never heard of that!! I will go and search!!
I had the sense while watching this video that the search for truth was the primary concern of its creator.
Well done.
I enjoyed your intro, your video, and this collaboration. Thank you for the quality information. I highly appreciate your goal of being objective, as well as that same goal by the other two contributors. Excellent work to you three.
God reward you with the best! ♥️🇧🇩
May Allah peace and blessings be upon him 🙏🏾❤️
@På Luffen then how do u think islam appeared?😂
@På Luffen 😂😂😂
@På Luffen Yeah , what a jokes man 😂😂🇸🇦🇹🇷❤️
@På Luffen Okay , How do people created the Qur'an ?
@På Luffen if you think that Qur'an is a regular book then you are stupider than I thought !
Pioneer work, great to see that there are religious people who can be also rational. Very very important thing, the key to the Muslim revival, growth, and peace!
Peace and blessings of Allah on beloved prophet Mohammed
Thank you very much my brother ❤
why is it so hard for people to accept that all religions is man made
Do we really need religion?
Bcz religion is th e only source of knowledge about unseen. Our present knowledge is limited to this world also it is just from day of Our birth till day of Our death. Explanation about what gona happen before and beyond this 2 points is found only in religion text book. Until those Atheist manage to find undeniable proof that God doesn't existed, for now I'm gona hold on to avalibale conventional manual (holy book). So good luck for you guys. Remember time is ticking.
Subhanallah Alhamdulilah Allah O Akbar peace and blessings of Allah swt be upon all the prophets and the muslim ummah Ameen ❤️❤️
This is UA-cam, not a Sunni Pray Station.
@@ANDROLOMA broo🤣🤣🤣
Not religious myself but I find religions and the different belief systems they have very interesting. In particular I’ve been diving a bit into learning about Islam lately since, as an American, it’s not something we really learn about in depth. Excellent work!
great!any questions on islam inbox me ,will definitely help you understand
U can read Qur'an And hadith translation on online
For the algorithm. Many thanks for your trailblazing work
A most interesting video about a most interesting person. Thank you!
I had heard that at some point Muhammad wrote a letter to the Roman Emperor of the time, basically saying "convert or we'll invade". The Romans ignored him, but (that's what I heard) they archived the letter, as state correspondence, so when Mehmet II conquered Constantinople the letter was found in the Imperial archives.
I have no idea if that's true, it's something I heard one time.
Paolo Federici
Isn't that a direct contradiction with the Quran "be not the transgressors"
@@mobeenkhan824 well the letter actually said ( join islam and be safe or god will curse you with the arians suffering) ....
" I invite you with the invitation of peace. If you submit then you will find safety and God will double your reward. If you turn away, you will bear the Arians’ sins."
Still, it is not historically "accurate" as it doesn't come from a non islamic source
@@moudhaffarsaidi9457 Arian's sins, I don't think Muhammad even knew about any Arians nor their beliefs but warning them about God cursing them with heretical sin was very ironic to hear when you're Christian since they used to did the same towards their faith brethrens.
@@apalahartisebuahnama7684 That's what was supposedly written in the letter, and there were many christian tribes and individuals in arabia of all sects, the stories also say that the prophet knew a christian arab and that he told him he was a prophet, so there is a good chance he knew a thing or two about christianity, and whether he knew about Arians or not is a matter of debate. And as I said, the letters are not historical proofs, at least to some academics
I am not a religious person of any faith, however I love your videos. I love to learn about the historical elements of religions
for me, who is generally not religious, i love those videos. it gives context, to peoples beliefs, without insulting, very objective. and its very interesting for the study of the history of civilisation and religion. very interesting. peace and love to all my muslim brothers.
Yea dude, you’re committing kufr by giving the so-called “historical” viewpoint credibility. If you truly believe in Muhammad ﷺ, you should make it clear that you renounce the “historical” and “liberal” viewpoint before you present it. This is how you can “reconcile” your work with the deen.
If Al-Muqaddimah sees this comment, just a correction concerning your most recent video: we do, in fact, have hadith compilations from the time of the prophet (saw) himself or from his companions. This includes: The Saheefa of Amr Ibn Al-As (incorporated into Musnad Imam Ahmad) , Saheefa of Ali ibn abi Talib (incorporated into Bukhary) , Saheefa of Sa'ad ibn Obadah (incorporated into Tirmidhi), a book of Zakah by Abu Bakr as-siddiq (incorporated into Bukhary), the Sermons of the prophet by Abu Shaam Al-Yamaani.
Although the last two aren't formally hadith compilations, they are teachings of the prophet (pbuh) nonetheless.
To believe in Adolf Hitler or Jesus or Mohammed or Gandhi or Napoléon by Mental Necessities and through testimonies
U have no academic methodology to claim that if the Roman spoke about Muhammad in their sources that could be right or reliably so let us give u other methodology if u killed a men and none sow u how we can prove that u killed we search about testimony if u killed in public that means u have no reason to deny we know that more than 100000 people claimed that the sow Muhammed face to face if someone lied in public about spreading a thought about Muhammad's existence and we believed in him that like making all the people stupides
@@couresesonline have you skipped the punctuation lesson in school?
10:27
Maybe it is of Muta battle in north Jordan, because it was in his lifetime, before 3 years of his death, and the sheet written a few years later.
Also, maybe some non-muslims due to bad translation that days they thought that Prophet Muhammad was still alive.
As an academic and a Muslim I thoroughly enjoy this channel and this video! 🙌🏽 May Allah SWT continue to guide you and forgive you and each of us who believe in Allah, The Prophet PBUH, The Books, the Angels, & The Final Day & Decree from our Lord. Ameen 🤲🏽