I just wanted to start preparing for the PMP exam in coming February 2025. Kindly guide me regarding preparing the exam course outline and also share the plan on daily basis.
I passed my PMP exam on 06/01/2025, and it was incredibly challenging with lengthy, complex questions that required careful reading. Andrew Ramdayal’s Udemy course for the 35 PDUs and his UA-cam videos were a game changer for me! His honest and effective teaching methods helped me understand the PMP mindset and prepared me to pass on the first try. I especially recommend his "200 Ultra Hard PMP Questions" on YT. While no questions on the exam were identical, the patterns and terminology were very similar. If you dedicate focused study time (21 days is ideal) and follow his resources, you can succeed. Practice the mindset and time management to handle the lengthy questions. Thank you, Andrew Ramdayal, for your excellent and helpful resources! 🙏
Q15. Correct answer should be A. Training sessions are generally broader and may not address the specific scope issues the team is struggling with. A workshop, on the other hand, can be tailored to focus on the exact challenges the team is facing. Also, just because the word " team" is not mentioned in option A, that doesnt mean workshop is conducted without team . The term "workshop" itself represents focused collaboration with team members to solve project related- specific problems...more on technical aspect.
Yes I agree with this as well. This from PMBOK A workshop is a structured and facilitated meeting where stakeholders and project team members collaborate to achieve a specific goal or set of objectives. Workshops are commonly used in various phases of the project management lifecycle to gather information, solve problems, make decisions, or develop plans.
Why could youtube does not relase to give multiple likes or some other emotion like love for any video? It is injustice to some videos like this. Fist set I got 2, this set I got 6 without completing the course 3rd chapter yet. Clearly the mindset is a awesome concept.
Thank you for explaining each and every questions and options.. I am eagerly waiting for your next questions series. Questions were really tough and I have managed to score 7/10 :)
Ohh i was so ready for the next series of question. I am so invested in your tutorials. I finished the 35 hour tutorial in Udemy. Your teaching method is the best!
Thank Andrew, I am schedule for Jan 6 for the test and I got your book, using Study Hall and going over your questions. Thank you for sharing the tips of the mind set. I will let you know, how I do.
Q14 is the issue about the stakeholder not receiving the report or that the important aspect of the structure was not tested? I assumed the latter would affect the project hence D
Thinking as a PM in the construction field I would raise this exact question, too. If the answer targets the missing report, hence the stakeholder register, then the statement that the stakeholder structure was not tested is superfluous and just meant to throw off candidates from the correct answer. That raises the issue of ethical testing in the PMP examination.
Question 17 needs re-visit C instead of B , below is my understanding The question asks for a strategy to prevent misunderstandings in a software development project with a client who has vague requirements and communication challenges. Analysis of Options: A. Apply a phased development approach to validate the project scope at each milestone: This approach allows gradual validation and realignment with client expectations over time. It’s useful when requirements are unclear. B. Collaborate with the product owner to establish a clear minimum viable product (MVP): This is common in Agile practices, focusing on delivering an initial working version quickly. However, it doesn't directly address communication issues. C. Enhance team-client communication protocols to ensure better clarity and feedback: This option directly targets the issue of communication, which is essential for avoiding misunderstandings. D. Implement strict deliverable schedules to force clarity in client interactions: While deadlines can help, forcing clarity through strict schedules might not foster the needed collaborative environment. Best Answer: The correct answer is likely C: "Enhance team-client communication protocols to ensure better clarity and feedback." Since the root problem is poor communication and vague requirements, improving communication protocols will address these issues most effectively.
I think the key issue here is the 'vague requirements' from client, and then the 'challenging communication' . The answer B) collaboration with stakeholder to establish MVP would be one of the best solution for that key issue, and also from PMP mindset as Andrew mentioned in the video, don't make decision all by yourself, which make answer C) not a good choice comparing with B) in this case.
You just have to remember that MVP is your powerful weapon, that’s why B is better, especially when the requirements are not clear, MVP can help the customer to understand what the end product they want, which is the root cause, also MVP is a tool to gain feedback so you clear 2 birds in 1 stone.
Why C is Correct Option C provides a broader, more adaptable solution that directly addresses the root problems in the scenario: • Misunderstandings (communication issues). • Unclear requirements (vague inputs). Establishing better communication protocols ensures clarity, improves client engagement, and creates alignment-essential for any development approach, including MVP. Why People May Choose B (MVP) • MVP sounds like a solution to vague requirements, as it provides a concrete way to narrow the scope and focus. • However, the question emphasizes both vague requirements and challenging communication, making C the more comprehensive answer.
Once he ads they already had issues with this particular client, and we have those in the software industry, it has been apparent to us that the client does not know how to communicate or showed us what they want or need, UNTIL, they see it to test it themselves. The client is NOT a tech expert, that is why he is paying us to develop a “ something” that makes him more productive, efficient, etc. What we do in our company, is to provide him a “something” that we think might work for him, he test drive it, and then he comes back and asked us to adjust this or that. That is called a MVP. To visualize better the issue here, let us add the words not written. Add this sentence to the issue statement. “ The client does not know how to communicate, and he is not sure what he needs until he test it”. I believe those are underlying words behind the “….often led to misunderstandings…” 😉
Thank you Andrew. Could you please include questions related to PMBOK 7 th edition . I’m going to take my PMP exam in two weeks. Please let me know if you have a video where you summarize the PM mindset including PMBOK 7th edition
I thought the same thing. I was so confused because I was so sure it was a quality issue.I had to really understand the question and I think the reason for his answer is if the project manager would have received the status report when they were supposed to, then they would have caught the important aspect of the structure that wasn’t tested earlier. So that’s how the whole issue could have been prevented. He went to the root of the problem.
In Question 14, if the stakeholder had not missed getting the test reports but had received the test reports on time and realized that an important aspect of the structure was not tested, then which tool should the PM have used to prevent this situation?
Mr. Andrew I believe Q14 writeup isn't clear about the "situation" to address, whether it is " missed test" or about the "stakeholder" him/her self having received such type of correspondence/feedback..
The problem I have with question 14 is, even if you informed all the stakeholders, you still would have missed the structural testing. This question doesn't come across as a communication stakeholder mishap, it reads more of a quality managment issue. The preventable measure should have been to thorougly go over the Quality managment plan to ensure all testing was performed.
first thank you so much second i liked the questions but i really pleased the way i am solving third please make it another 10 faster and make it more difficult than the previous 20 questions
On question 17th, is it not a bad idea to collaborate with PO and not the team as the team will be doing the work? Can you also please explain why on the 20th question the option C is correct? Should it not be evaluated first before taking or directing any execution?
Question 19: The concern is limited features in the release. Wouldn't B (stakeholders feedback) will take care of both timelines and feature issue within future releases
On Q14 how do we understand the main focus is on stakeholder not receiving the report but not on the important aspect that he noticed that was not tested ?
I think it's because if that stakeholder had received communication earlier, that error would have been caught sooner and addressed. (I was thrown by this one, too).
Hello Sir, for Q.No:14, it was also asked "one of the important aspect WAS NOT TESTED". So why not the Quality Management Plan can be the right answer? He might have used this to check if all aspects were tested or not and take the action accordingly either by asking the QA team to intervene.
The question here shows that stakeholder missed an important information, when he received he noticed that some thing has not been tested. Now they ask- that how the PM could have avoided this situation? If the stakeholder got this info on time, he would have told well on time that this XYZ thing has to be tested. So the actual issue (root cause) here is - uninformed stakeholder- which led to another issue. So to make sure that stakeholder got this info on time, PM should have checked the stakeholder register, which has all the details about which stakeholder should be updated with what project related information. I hope I could explain it well. However, Stakeholder Register is not a tool, it is a document. ;)
Qu 14 😊 . If the stakeholder didn't get the report, then that stakeholder might not be there on the stakeholder list or importance was plotted wrongly. So the answer could be stakeholder mgt plan!
Question 19- Andrew, aren't future release timelines usually finalized? I agree you can change what goes into the release but the release timeline itself cannot be changed i thought
The manager chooses to experiment with the new tool on a small scale within the project as a first step. This helps evaluate the tool's effectiveness and impact before fully implementing it, reducing potential risks and ensuring the tool's suitability for the team's needs. The answer C Option
It is a strong argument for option A that in agile time is one of the constraints you are running against. Evaluating how the time is going to be affected sounds like a better choice, then have the team test the tool, with the knowledge of how using that time affects the project. Example, if the team already planned to use e-mail, as a communication tool that everyone is familiar with, introducing a “specialized” tool that the team might need training, or the IT department might have to install in the computers, etc. might affect the timeline already planned. C might be a great second step after knowing the impact. On the other hand, the question is not what the PM should do first or next.
Yes!!! Invite them on a regular Sprint Review wirh Product Demo will help a lot. Option A (adjusting future release timelines) - focuses on scheduling (NOT ADAPTATION) rather than directly addressing the need for alignment and collaboration. While this might help, it doesn’t address the root cause-stakeholders were not fully engaged in the release planning and feedback process. Option B - In Agile, sprint reviews are a regular opportunity for stakeholders to see the latest product increments and provide feedback. By inviting stakeholders, like the Vice President of Marketing, to these reviews, the project manager can ensure they have a platform to observe progress, engage with the team, and provide real-time input. This approach enables the project manager to clarify expectations, refine the product incrementally, and adjust based on direct feedback. It looks like the best case, HOWEVER one NO, inviting the Vice President of Marketing to every sprint review may not be practical due to their workload and the team’s comfort with high-level management presence at each session. But finally one YES - a modified approach could be to invite them selectively, such as for key milestones, major functionality demonstrations (and this is still inline with definition of answer B approach). Really tricky question :)
Disagree with 14. The biggest issue is the omission of a testing requirement. What difference would them having the report matter if the test was still incomplete/incorrect? Seems like the issue is related to quality requirements, no?
I agree C is not correct The question specifically asks which tool could have prevented the situation where: 1. A stakeholder did not receive the structural integrity test status reports. 2. An important aspect of the structure was not tested. This highlights two issues: 1. A communication gap with the stakeholder. 2. A failure to ensure that all required structural tests were completed. The stakeholder register helps identify stakeholders and their needs, but it does not track whether specific requirements, like tests, have been completed. It primarily ensures stakeholders are recognized and engaged but doesn’t provide a mechanism to prevent missed requirements or incomplete tests. • While it can ensure the stakeholder is informed, it wouldn’t directly prevent the structural test from being missed, which is a core issue in this scenario.the CORRECT ANSWER IS B
The issue seems to be that this is a “key” stakeholder, which implies he seems to be a subject expert in the matter of the structures, sort of like no one else knows more about the product than him. The check and balance of this project appears to be that this “key” stakeholder is supposed to be that checker/balance that assures that the structural integrity tests are being conducted properly, etc. Are the tests being conducted properly? Only this key stakeholder is the one that can assure you of that. If we are not holding that important “seat” for this “key” stakeholder our project will be derailed by bad quality. This needs to be corrected first, before we can address the quality of the testing. The Stakeholder Registry, is where we can make the appropriate correction, identifying, and classifying what this key stakeholder or how to interact, and incorporate this key stakeholder. The matrix, might not even hold information about the how to do testing on structures, it does not contain all the details of every single part of the processes little details of constructing a whole building. The matrix might just say, structural integrity needs to be tested. That was my understanding of this, I been known to be wrong though. 😅
Hey Andrew, I Passed PMP in August 2024 in the first attempt. Thank you for all the help.
I just wanted to start preparing for the PMP exam in coming February 2025. Kindly guide me regarding preparing the exam course outline and also share the plan on daily basis.
Yes. This will help a lot
How long did you stufyv
I passed my PMP exam on 06/01/2025, and it was incredibly challenging with lengthy, complex questions that required careful reading. Andrew Ramdayal’s Udemy course for the 35 PDUs and his UA-cam videos were a game changer for me! His honest and effective teaching methods helped me understand the PMP mindset and prepared me to pass on the first try.
I especially recommend his "200 Ultra Hard PMP Questions" on YT.
While no questions on the exam were identical, the patterns and terminology were very similar. If you dedicate focused study time (21 days is ideal) and follow his resources, you can succeed. Practice the mindset and time management to handle the lengthy questions.
Thank you, Andrew Ramdayal, for your excellent and helpful resources! 🙏
Q15. Correct answer should be A. Training sessions are generally broader and may not address the specific scope issues the team is struggling with. A workshop, on the other hand, can be tailored to focus on the exact challenges the team is facing.
Also, just because the word " team" is not mentioned in option A, that doesnt mean workshop is conducted without team . The term "workshop" itself represents focused collaboration with team members to solve project related- specific problems...more on technical aspect.
I thought the exact same thing
Yes I agree with this as well. This from PMBOK
A workshop is a structured and facilitated meeting where stakeholders and project team members collaborate to achieve a specific goal or set of objectives. Workshops are commonly used in various phases of the project management lifecycle to gather information, solve problems, make decisions, or develop plans.
Same thing with me, I was surprised when he marked A as the wrong answer.
Just passed today and your videos really helped! Thank you!
Congratulations! I am planning to prepare PMP exam. Should I go with PMBOK 7th or both 6 and 7? Thanks
Thank you sir for the explanations, it's really giving me more insights into the PMI mindset
Why could youtube does not relase to give multiple likes or some other emotion like love for any video? It is injustice to some videos like this. Fist set I got 2, this set I got 6 without completing the course 3rd chapter yet. Clearly the mindset is a awesome concept.
8/10... taking the exam next week! Thanks Andrew
Thank you for explaining each and every questions and options.. I am eagerly waiting for your next questions series. Questions were really tough and I have managed to score 7/10 :)
Thank you Andrew. I passed my PMP today. Your videos and courses on Udemy helped my study.
Really good one, i am getting better with the explanantion. Cant wait for more, please upload soon.. got 6/10
Hey Andrew. For Q 20 asking the team to try out - will that not be a non value added task for the team apart from the usual tasks?
I agree. How is this a better answer than option A? You’re making a unilateral decision to make your team do extra work.
I agree with you guys @CarobeeC and @numberhoan. I would have gone with A too.
Ohh i was so ready for the next series of question. I am so invested in your tutorials. I finished the 35 hour tutorial in Udemy. Your teaching method is the best!
Thank Andrew, I am schedule for Jan 6 for the test and I got your book, using Study Hall and going over your questions. Thank you for sharing the tips of the mind set. I will let you know, how I do.
Thank you Andrew for your videos, passed the PMP yesterday after going through your videos and questions. 🙏
Q14 is the issue about the stakeholder not receiving the report or that the important aspect of the structure was not tested? I assumed the latter would affect the project hence D
Exactly the same reasoning here.
Thinking as a PM in the construction field I would raise this exact question, too. If the answer targets the missing report, hence the stakeholder register, then the statement that the stakeholder structure was not tested is superfluous and just meant to throw off candidates from the correct answer. That raises the issue of ethical testing in the PMP examination.
Agree with this rationale as well.
I write in 8 days and this is coming at a very helpful time for me!! Thank you for doing what you do!!😊
Hi, did you pass?
Question 17 needs re-visit C instead of B , below is my understanding
The question asks for a strategy to prevent misunderstandings in a software development project with a client who has vague requirements and communication challenges.
Analysis of Options:
A. Apply a phased development approach to validate the project scope at each milestone:
This approach allows gradual validation and realignment with client expectations over time. It’s useful when requirements are unclear.
B. Collaborate with the product owner to establish a clear minimum viable product (MVP):
This is common in Agile practices, focusing on delivering an initial working version quickly. However, it doesn't directly address communication issues.
C. Enhance team-client communication protocols to ensure better clarity and feedback:
This option directly targets the issue of communication, which is essential for avoiding misunderstandings.
D. Implement strict deliverable schedules to force clarity in client interactions:
While deadlines can help, forcing clarity through strict schedules might not foster the needed collaborative environment.
Best Answer:
The correct answer is likely C: "Enhance team-client communication protocols to ensure better clarity and feedback."
Since the root problem is poor communication and vague requirements, improving communication protocols will address these issues most effectively.
I think the key issue here is the 'vague requirements' from client, and then the 'challenging communication' . The answer B) collaboration with stakeholder to establish MVP would be one of the best solution for that key issue, and also from PMP mindset as Andrew mentioned in the video, don't make decision all by yourself, which make answer C) not a good choice comparing with B) in this case.
You just have to remember that MVP is your powerful weapon, that’s why B is better, especially when the requirements are not clear, MVP can help the customer to understand what the end product they want, which is the root cause, also MVP is a tool to gain feedback so you clear 2 birds in 1 stone.
Why C is Correct
Option C provides a broader, more adaptable solution that directly addresses the root problems in the scenario:
• Misunderstandings (communication issues).
• Unclear requirements (vague inputs).
Establishing better communication protocols ensures clarity, improves client engagement, and creates alignment-essential for any development approach, including MVP. Why People May Choose B (MVP)
• MVP sounds like a solution to vague requirements, as it provides a concrete way to narrow the scope and focus.
• However, the question emphasizes both vague requirements and challenging communication, making C the more comprehensive answer.
Once he ads they already had issues with this particular client, and we have those in the software industry, it has been apparent to us that the client does not know how to communicate or showed us what they want or need, UNTIL, they see it to test it themselves. The client is NOT a tech expert, that is why he is paying us to develop a “ something” that makes him more productive, efficient, etc. What we do in our company, is to provide him a “something” that we think might work for him, he test drive it, and then he comes back and asked us to adjust this or that. That is called a MVP. To visualize better the issue here, let us add the words not written. Add this sentence to the issue statement. “ The client does not know how to communicate, and he is not sure what he needs until he test it”. I believe those are underlying words behind the “….often led to misunderstandings…” 😉
Thank you Andrew. Could you please include questions related to PMBOK 7 th edition . I’m going to take my PMP exam in two weeks. Please let me know if you have a video where you summarize the PM mindset including PMBOK 7th edition
Thank you, Andrew.
Q14, the question stem states that an important aspect of the structure was not tested. Isn't it a quality issue (Op D)?
I thought the same thing. I was so confused because I was so sure it was a quality issue.I had to really understand the question and I think the reason for his answer is if the project manager would have received the status report when they were supposed to, then they would have caught the important aspect of the structure that wasn’t tested earlier. So that’s how the whole issue could have been prevented. He went to the root of the problem.
Excellent. Appreciate for the very useful videos 🌻
6 out of 10 !
In Question 14, if the stakeholder had not missed getting the test reports but had received the test reports on time and realized that an important aspect of the structure was not tested, then which tool should the PM have used to prevent this situation?
I believe it should be the Quality Management Plan
Mr. Andrew I believe Q14 writeup isn't clear about the "situation" to address, whether it is " missed test" or about the "stakeholder" him/her self having received such type of correspondence/feedback..
The problem I have with question 14 is, even if you informed all the stakeholders, you still would have missed the structural testing. This question doesn't come across as a communication stakeholder mishap, it reads more of a quality managment issue. The preventable measure should have been to thorougly go over the Quality managment plan to ensure all testing was performed.
first thank you so much
second i liked the questions but i really pleased the way i am solving
third please make it another 10 faster and make it more difficult than the previous 20 questions
I’m needing help thinking with the agile mindset any help?
Thank you!!
Thanks a lot
On question 17th, is it not a bad idea to collaborate with PO and not the team as the team will be doing the work?
Can you also please explain why on the 20th question the option C is correct? Should it not be evaluated first before taking or directing any execution?
Question 19: The concern is limited features in the release. Wouldn't B (stakeholders feedback) will take care of both timelines and feature issue within future releases
Sir do you provide personal coaching for project management?
Hi Andrew. Q19. why is B not a better choice than A?
On Q14 how do we understand the main focus is on stakeholder not receiving the report but not on the important aspect that he noticed that was not tested ?
I think it's because if that stakeholder had received communication earlier, that error would have been caught sooner and addressed. (I was thrown by this one, too).
Q14 is the most controversial
I wish I could solve maximum questions like this by next week, since I have my 1st ever exam next weekend :) Shit scared :|
Hello Sir, for Q.No:14, it was also asked "one of the important aspect WAS NOT TESTED". So why not the Quality Management Plan can be the right answer? He might have used this to check if all aspects were tested or not and take the action accordingly either by asking the QA team to intervene.
The question here shows that stakeholder missed an important information, when he received he noticed that some thing has not been tested. Now they ask- that how the PM could have avoided this situation?
If the stakeholder got this info on time, he would have told well on time that this XYZ thing has to be tested. So the actual issue (root cause) here is - uninformed stakeholder- which led to another issue. So to make sure that stakeholder got this info on time, PM should have checked the stakeholder register, which has all the details about which stakeholder should be updated with what project related information.
I hope I could explain it well.
However, Stakeholder Register is not a tool, it is a document. ;)
looking forward to 21-30
Thank u Andrew
i started my study of PMP exam, and facing memorized Tools and EVM formula. any tips which can be follow.
Qu 14 😊 . If the stakeholder didn't get the report, then that stakeholder might not be there on the stakeholder list or importance was plotted wrongly. So the answer could be stakeholder mgt plan!
Question 19- Andrew, aren't future release timelines usually finalized? I agree you can change what goes into the release but the release timeline itself cannot be changed i thought
Question 13 is so hard. I thought the mindset was to always research first. But I guess the question says next not first 😅
Q17, it's not apparent that it is an Adaptive project, which makes option C more relevant. Confusing :/
Thanks Andrew for this woderful video! I am planning to prepare PMP exam. Should I go with PMBOK 7th or both 6 and 7? Thanks
6/10....am I ready?
On Q20, if it was a predictive project and for instance you replace PO by project sponsor, will the answer still be option-C or would it be option-A?
next video please please please
Q 20 the answer should be "A"
The manager chooses to experiment with the new tool on a small scale within the project as a first step. This helps evaluate the tool's effectiveness and impact before fully implementing it, reducing potential risks and ensuring the tool's suitability for the team's needs. The answer C Option
It is a strong argument for option A that in agile time is one of the constraints you are running against. Evaluating how the time is going to be affected sounds like a better choice, then have the team test the tool, with the knowledge of how using that time affects the project. Example, if the team already planned to use e-mail, as a communication tool that everyone is familiar with, introducing a “specialized” tool that the team might need training, or the IT department might have to install in the computers, etc. might affect the timeline already planned. C might be a great second step after knowing the impact. On the other hand, the question is not what the PM should do first or next.
Hi, Andrew .
I think the answer to Q19 is B .could you please recheck it again and confirm whether Iam right or wrong ?
Yes!!! Invite them on a regular Sprint Review wirh Product Demo will help a lot. Option A (adjusting future release timelines) - focuses on scheduling (NOT ADAPTATION) rather than directly addressing the need for alignment and collaboration. While this might help, it doesn’t address the root cause-stakeholders were not fully engaged in the release planning and feedback process. Option B - In Agile, sprint reviews are a regular opportunity for stakeholders to see the latest product increments and provide feedback. By inviting stakeholders, like the Vice President of Marketing, to these reviews, the project manager can ensure they have a platform to observe progress, engage with the team, and provide real-time input. This approach enables the project manager to clarify expectations, refine the product incrementally, and adjust based on direct feedback. It looks like the best case, HOWEVER one NO, inviting the Vice President of Marketing to every sprint review may not be practical due to their workload and the team’s comfort with high-level management presence at each session. But finally one YES - a modified approach could be to invite them selectively, such as for key milestones, major functionality demonstrations (and this is still inline with definition of answer B approach). Really tricky question :)
Great going…
8/10
Disagree with 14. The biggest issue is the omission of a testing requirement. What difference would them having the report matter if the test was still incomplete/incorrect? Seems like the issue is related to quality requirements, no?
I agree C is not correct The question specifically asks which tool could have prevented the situation where:
1. A stakeholder did not receive the structural integrity test status reports.
2. An important aspect of the structure was not tested.
This highlights two issues:
1. A communication gap with the stakeholder.
2. A failure to ensure that all required structural tests were completed. The stakeholder register helps identify stakeholders and their needs, but it does not track whether specific requirements, like tests, have been completed. It primarily ensures stakeholders are recognized and engaged but doesn’t provide a mechanism to prevent missed requirements or incomplete tests.
• While it can ensure the stakeholder is informed, it wouldn’t directly prevent the structural test from being missed, which is a core issue in this scenario.the CORRECT ANSWER IS B
The issue seems to be that this is a “key” stakeholder, which implies he seems to be a subject expert in the matter of the structures, sort of like no one else knows more about the product than him. The check and balance of this project appears to be that this “key” stakeholder is supposed to be that checker/balance that assures that the structural integrity tests are being conducted properly, etc. Are the tests being conducted properly? Only this key stakeholder is the one that can assure you of that. If we are not holding that important “seat” for this “key” stakeholder our project will be derailed by bad quality. This needs to be corrected first, before we can address the quality of the testing. The Stakeholder Registry, is where we can make the appropriate correction, identifying, and classifying what this key stakeholder or how to interact, and incorporate this key stakeholder. The matrix, might not even hold information about the how to do testing on structures, it does not contain all the details of every single part of the processes little details of constructing a whole building. The matrix might just say, structural integrity needs to be tested. That was my understanding of this, I been known to be wrong though. 😅
6/10
got wrong Q:14 checked with chatgpt also wrong..
what we wait it will be you