Road to the Stars (1956-1957)(restored color).
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 кві 2012
- One man in Russia filmed the future - before Sputnik! Did Kubrick copy his work? (Read more www.astronautix.com/r/roadtoth...)
Interesting detail: A rocket use reusable launch system(4:37). First stage of the rocket will return to the Earth.
Pavel Klushantsev's movie "Road to the stars". Restored color. With handmade Russian subtitles (English subtitles is mashine translation and from www.opensubtitles.org). Second part (Science Fiction) of Pavel Klushantsev's movie "Road to the stars" (Doroga k zvezdam. Дорога к звёздам.CAMINO A LAS ESTRELLAS de Pavel Klushantsev).
Soviet Union:Leningrad Popular Science Film Studio, 1956-1957
Director: Pavel Klushantsev
Consultant at the stage of creation and development of the scenario and reviewer - Yan Ivanovich Koltunov (www.koltunov.ru)
"Road to stars" - the first Soviet color popular science and scientific film about space exploration.
The film consists of two parts: popular-science and science-feature.
In the second part the director and the artist create a picture of the future of the cosmonautics.
The screenplay began to form in 1953. In 1956 began filming. In the summer of 1957 (in Crimea near Yalta) filming was completed. - Наука та технологія
These and other films I restored myself with the help of Photoshop. This required a lot of time. Then I did some subtitles for movies.
Alex R fuck usa.
Alex R - Amazing quality - thank you for your efforts
Quite nicely done! Thank you!
Thanks, terrific job!
@@terrylucas8424 Yes but is worth
Excellent colour restoration of the original Sovcolor [East German Agfacolour] negatives. An excellent film with superb production values.
The US and EU have put in effect sanctions against the Crimea area. Google plans to cut off services starting on February 1st. So if you like this video, then save it to your hard drive. On February 1, the account can be disabled.
Well, mate, this upload is still available for all to marvel at.
Thought East German Agfacolour film was ORWO? Remember.....
@ J S R Lasher & Jim Griffin : Yes, excellent; nevertheless, Agfacolor, not Agfacolour ...
Terrific restoration, thank you Alex for this pre-Sputnik vision. Notice how well dressed everyone is, ties for the men, dresses for the women. Ahh, the '50s. US was already deep into its cold war with Russia and the USSR. Three stage rocket ship and space station torus very similar to von Braun's designs.
Брльшое спасибо за фильмы из моего детства! Были ещё и великолепные книги по астрономии и космонавтике...Работал в Гомеле планетарий...В итоге-- стал учителем физики и астрономии,читал лекции писал статьи,книги...
Wow! This is way way ahead of it's time. Thanks for sharing.
This was beautiful! Thank you very much. I was especially pleased at the demonstration of Einstein’s “equivalence” principle.
This is great stuff. Many thanks for putting it on UA-cam. It’s wonderfully prescient. Bits of it look like a mashup of 2001 A Space Odyssey and a Space X commercial. The best bit for me are the crew quarters with the cat on the space station 😊
I saw this footage a few years ago on Finnish TV. I have been looking for this ever since.
It really captures what science is all about i.e. the possibilities are limitless especially if we put our differences aside.
Everything is out there for us to discover!
Great work Alex!!!
thank you
Ah, the days when full leather flight suits and boots were the standard! Gotta say the Soviets knew how to suit up for space. The Klingons would have taken pause when meeting us this way.
Very true.
For anyone who might be interested in finding out more about this film, and other SF from the "eastern bloc" I mention the following: Back some 15-ish-plus years ago I completed a 17-part series of articles for Filmfax magazine about the making of this as well as many Soviet-Russian sf, fantasy and horror films. I drew upon my travels in Russia to the various studios and archives, as well as meetings and interviews with the people---many of whom were still alive when I started my researches in 1980---who made these films to get accurate first-hand details and stories, as well as to locate behind-the-scenes photos, drawings, scripts and other such materials. (Filmfax probably still has back issues...IF anyone is even interested in this sort of thing. Again, I mention this only because I've seen a lot of questions in the comment sections from people who are intrigued and curious about all these imaginative films. And, no, I don't get anything from Filmfax for mentioning this/am only providing the information for those who might be interested because I too shared the same thing. :-)
Thanx Alex R for your work!
This is an astonishng realistic docu-like movie, for 1956/7!
Thank you, it is amazing!
The foreground miniature work is astounding!
I was quite surprised by this film - the staging of the rockets was way ahead of it's time, as was the spacewalk.
Well done for 1956!
Cosmonauts dressed in 1930' s Buck Rogers outfits.
1957!!!! I only now realize how much ahead the Ussr was!
Well they did put up Sputnik that year.
How do you figure the USSR was ahead? I mean, they *were,* but this is just an edu-tainment film. It doesn't reflect actual progress at the time. Disney ran a special on TV in 1955 called "Man in Space" that did the same sort of thing.
Thanks for making this available! I'm a retired Pilot (frustrated non-Astronaut) I always wondered when watching Friday night Space movies did the USSR make any sci-fi movies? Thanks again, I'm subscribed.
Fragments of popular Soviet SCI-FI you can see in this short clip - /watch?v=2xGx8Ls5G80
The Reds made a ton of SciFi movies! They're very unique and insightful, definitely on-par or more with their Western counterparts in my opinion. Thye have more novels for scifi it seems like, though. Solaris is a real good one, both a movie and a novel, and I loved Roadside Picnic too.
look this too paleofuture.gizmodo.com/how-russians-imagined-the-year-2017-in-1960-1790754031 has english. about first russian tablet :) 1960
There are a few other good science fiction films from the USSR, such as “Cosmic Journey” (1936), “Planet Of Storms” (1962), and “A Dream Come True” (1963).
Although there are a lot of parallels to the 1st unit filming techniques Kubrick used, the major breakthrough for 2001 was the use of YCM separations when making a composite...which allowed more control over the coloration and density of the final composit neg...rather than use bluescreen dupe composites. You get a very detailed image without edge "bleed" in the images as per George Pal's "Conquest of Space". Also, the level of model detailing and set design was superb in 2001.
Privyet. Super! I learned about a year of Russian grammar just by reading the subtitles.)) Klushantsev was a visionary. He beat Kubrick to artificial gravity and the cockpit seating looked like the Space Shuttle. The concepts remind me of Willy Ley (google him). Большое вам спасибо за вашу тяжелую работу!!!!!
they even have a decent explanation of weightlessness! the hardest of sci fi.
Do you have physics taught at school?
I just laughed for a long time after reading your comment.
@@nobody_dude the movie is for 1925 tho. very good explanation for the time
@@nobody_dude Nikto, to be fair, he didn't say this for himself necessarily. This was a good explanation for kids prior to later education studies in Jr and high school.
Thank you soooo much for the great work!
Some amazing work here predating Hollywood's efforts. The curved floor of the space station was almost like that seen in 2001. The lunar lander was quite convincing as well. A great effort for the late 50s!
Dude, no. Just, no. You need to watch some actual high-quality 1950s American science fiction movies before you say that sort of thing. Specifically I'd suggest "Destination Moon," and "Conquest of Space," both of which are as accurate as it was possible to be about space in those days.
Or at least paralleling stuff done in Hollywood. There are some really ambitious rarely-attempted shots in this involving a couple double "layers" of perspective work, and intricate model detail that topped what was being done in the States until the later era of 2001, SILENT RUNNING, JOURNEY TO THE FAR SIDE OF THE SUN and such which came into being some 10 plus years later, some of it inspired by this very movie (it had limited theatrical release in the west, but drew a lot of attention from being featured on shows like the Walter Cronkite CBS tv series, the 20th CENTURY. But also some techniques ---such as shooting up at spacesuit-clad actors so that the wires suspending them in "zero-gravity"would be hidden by the actors' bodies, which had yet to be tried in earlier space and/or fantasy films films (same re the rotating set that allowed an actor to walk up the walls, which was later fine-tuned by Kubrick) with the advantage of much much bigger budget.) Imaginative resourcefulness was the key to creating a film like this, produced at a very small studio (The Studio for the Production of Popular Science Films in St. Petersburg) for peanuts.
I got to be friends with the director and some of the people who worked on this film, and am so glad that I reached out to them when they were still alive some 35-40 years ago. I truly value one of the small space suited figures used in this film that I was given as a souvenir.
It might be worth pointing out that whereas Kubrick can be celebrated for his accomplishment with 2001, and this film can be punished by commentators for being not up to the later film's standards, that Kubrick's film had, quite literally, a budget almost 100 times the budget of Pavel Klushantsev's. Plus Mr. Klushantsev was working in a country in which resources and supplies were constantly wanting. Slick production values and technical perfectibility are all based on budgets. In the case of ROAD TO THE STARS, the human creators had to use the sheer force of their wills, put in extreme unpaid work hours and personal passion and dedication above and beyond the norm to get their film made with a degree of quality. (I met a number of them, and have a lot of the paper work that provides the strongest evidence of just how hard some of these Russian films were to make.)
Then again, there's the vast technological differences. A top-end film setup, for example, in 1957 is definitely not gonna get you as far as a top-end setup in 2001, even if relative to their time periods they cost the same.
But regarding everything else, wouldn't the Soviet government love to make this film as good as it can be for any amounts of resources to use it as a valuable propaganda tool? The movie's in 1957, so right before/after sputnik/Laika-perfect timing to get the world to hear about this momumental achievement of theirs.
@Direct Webstores you need to be 18 or older to post
@@october2947 This film was made by a small "science film" company that made shorts, not features. They didn't get much respect from the government. Regardless of what propaganda might come of it, films like this were always considered a risk to make, and money was always tight. All studios---here and abroad---were very very tight with the money being spent on films. Especially with SF-type subjects. Up until, maybe, the late '70's, no one was throwing money around as investors would start to do after STAR WARS came out (which also had a tight budget/same as ALIEN and ALIENS). Only occasionally would big investments be made prior to that time, for maybe a "spectacle" like Ben Hur or some such.
@@october2947 Of course. There are tools now that allow things to be done far far cheaper. What it cost, for example, for raw film stock and lab processing costs---to say nothing of the cost of a professional 35mm motion picture camera to even begin to put images on film---can now be struck off the budget list for the most part, especially for smaller projects like this which could even be shot on a cell phone if push came to shove. There are huge advantages nowadays that make comparing film making in the past to doing the same today almost absurd.
Standing on the outside of the rocket. How cool was that!! "The ROCKET RIDEEEEEEEER!!!"
No space suits in this flick - haunting ....it's like a dream reliving Woschod 1 - Soyuz 11 or Challenger....
What a treasure t find this film.
Amazingly prescient in so many ways.
:) "The final section of the film portrays the launching of the first Soviet man into space, the first space station, and the first landing on the moon. In creating this footage Klushantsev created marvellous special effects, using techniques copied by Stanley Kubrick ten years later for 2001: A Space Odyssey . Indeed, some sequences in 2001 seems a shot-for-shot duplication of Road to the Stars ….." Encyclopedia Astronautica
about "Road to the Stars"
Whoa. How on earth 🌏 did they film this. Treasure.
Quite ingenious, some of the ideas; like welding using the Sun's rays and a parabolic mirror !
какой замечательный фильм! он даже предсказывает многоразовые космические аппараты, как SpaceX!
Вы заметили изогнутые полы на космической станции? Стэнли Кубрик использовал ту же иллюзию в фильме 2001: A Space Odyssey.
The USA just couldn't imagine the Soviet Union were this advanced in the 1950s - at last concerning rocketry. Otherwise they would have made more work of the American space program earlier
The United States did not imagine that the USSR has the necessary technology and money for this after the recent war that destroyed most of the
industry and agriculture.
It is a huge pity that the US made cuts to NASA at the end of the Apollo program. All those engineers and technicians out of work...all that ability let go to waste. If post-Nixon presidents had the guts to keep the programs running we'd already be on Mars and the Orion project would already be pushing astronauts out to the end of the solar system.
As a young boy watching the moon landing I was filled with great hope for the future of mankind. Then it was all pissed away because of politics. So sad...so bloody sad!
Actually, American government officials were well aware that the USSR was planning to launch a satellite. They had announced their plan as a part of the International Geophysical Year which ran from July 1957-December 1958. The US had also stated that we would launch a satellite as a part of the IGY. This was known as Project Vanguard. (www.nrl.navy.mil/accomplishments/rockets/vanguard-project/)
While the popular public memory of the launch of Sputnik portrayed America as being caught by surprise, many officials, including President Eisenhower, were well aware of the ability of the Soviets to launch a satellite. Eisenhower was pleased by Sputnik because it established an "Open Skies" policy for orbital spacecraft. The information US intelligence had on the USSR came from the very controversial and dangerous U-2 surveillance flights. We knew that it was just a matter of time before the Soviets would be able to shoot down the U-2. Still, the imagery the spy plane returned showed the activity at Tyuratam preparing the R-7 ICBM on the pad which was used to launch Sputnik.
The US could have easily launched a satellite in 1956 if our goal was to beat the Soviets into space. The Wernher von Braun Team at the Army Ballistic Missile Agency had the Jupiter-C booster. It was first flown on September 19, 1956 as a test of the rocket itself. No nose cone was carried. All three stages fired successfully and the final stage reached an altitude of 682 statute miles. A dummy fourth stage was placed atop the vehicle as an aerodynamic and structural test. It was apparent that a live fourth stage would have been able to push a small payload to orbit, but ABMA was not authorized to make the attempt. (Von Braun's team did launch Explorer I which was the first American satellite on 2/1/58)
Eisenhower kept turning down the ABMA requests to use the Jupiter-C to launch a satellite. The reasons given vary from Ike not wanting a military missile used, or the resentment against the Germans who dominated the von Braun Team, or the desire to have the Soviets launch first to establish the freedom to fly spacecraft in orbit over other countries, or all of the above. So when the news of the launch of Sputnik became known, Ike did not panic or worry. Unfortunately, he couldn't share why he didn't feel strong concern about the Soviet achievement to the public because the information came from top secret U-2 flights and a secret radar facility in Eastern Iran.
History is much more complex and interesting than is generally known. There is so much important information and context that is not known by the general public at the time of such events due to national security issues. We have to wait until such programs, like the U-2 flights, are declassified. We also could have launched Shepard's Mercury sub-orbital flight before Gagarin's orbital flight in 1961. The issue there was the conservative nature of NASA engineering officials who wanted to be sure that the Mercury capsule was ready to launch a human. This caused the delay that allowed the Soviets to be first in launching a human into space. Imagine how different history would have been if Shepard had been first. No urgent need for a Space Race or motive for Kennedy to challenge America to send men to the moon and return them safely to the earth by the end of the decade.
And now USA flying on Russian space ships! To the space stacion
@@tripsadelica Tell me about it. I was a kid from one of those families of technicians that got put out of work.
I see where Kubrick got some ideas from.
This is reminiscent of the Disney TV productions, such as Man in Space with Wernher von Braun, Man and the Moon, and Mars and Beyond, from the same era.
Я рад, что американцы и люди других стран видят этот фильм!
Смотрють панимаш и какаютси ат зависти👍
это было самое светлое время!
Для кого?
Spasibo Alexander!
+toxteth o'grady Пожалуйста
Вот смотрите, прошло почти 70 лет, а воз и ныне там, сколько охламонов досих пор кормится этим! Пора изобретать "Летающию тарелку"!
Visioners! Great movie!
Brilliant filmmaking, especially the live miniatures. Makes me suspect Pavel Klushantsev watched Howard & Theodore Lydecker's special-effects work, and learned from it. But hey, 'always steal from the best', and so forth.
I knew Pavel Klushantsev (there's even a documentary about my friendship with him). He wasn't familiar with any of the Lydecker-type films. Very few American films made it over to the USSR until the early 60's when things opened up a bit more between our countries. The main Lydecker work prior to 1956 (when this went into production) was on Republic serials, which were not exactly the kind of films that were being exchanged with between US and USSR. Pavel had been doing effects for many years and had developed his own techniques, many of them prior to the Lydeckers work. I have a lot of Pavel's papers and reports that illustrate some parallel development between both countries, but there was stil an awful big separation and break in communications in terms of popular cinema.
Ahhhh!! Maybe you already know this, but i'm so happy, i've just clicked on the "CC" Captions button in the lower right corner of the screen, to make the russian subtitles appear, and -tcharan- there's this magical option: "Translate Captions"!!! :| Now im seeing it with portuguese subtitles! not the most perfect translation, but still, not russian :) *
Klushantsev was a genius! Had he lived in the USA, he would have been a millionare. On a contrary, he had died poor, unhonered and totally forgotten in Saint-Petersburg in the late 90's. His name is now better known in Hollywood than in the homeland. Sad story, quite typical of Russia.
У меня есть его книга "О чём рассказал телескоп". Не знал, что он известен в штатах
Where did these restored versions of Road to the stars and Luna (Moon) come from?
Why would anyone assume Kubrick copied this? By 1956 you had Destination Moon (Similar to this), When Worlds Collide, Conquest of Space, War of the Worlds, and Forbidden Planet, all impressive mid-to-big budget SF movies.
Specific comparisons of shots from the two films have been analyzed by the filmmaker Alessandro Cima (Wikipedia)
@@AlexanderJ I'm not trying to be argumentative or anything, but that Wiki article makes a big deal about showing a rotating circular space station 11 years before 2001, *but* it doesn't mention that it's a couple years *AFTER* the rotating wheel space station George Pal showed in "Conquest of Space." And Disney showed one on TV in 1955. (Admittedly neither in as impressive detail as Road to the Stars)
Both Road to the Stars and 2001's 2nd chapter *roughly* follow the outline for space exploration laid down by Colliers magazine in 1952.
The point I'm getting at here is that Kubrick wasn't really in the habit of copying other filmmakers, particularly really obscure ones behind the Iron Curtain who he likely never heard of. Similarities in shots probably have more to do with there only being so many ways to interestingly portray spacecraft landing on the moon than anything else. Or they were both culling from Colliers.
I'm just not buying it. Again: Not meant as an argument, but I've just seen thousands of old space movies and honestly, that kind of thing turns up a lot.
@@mahatmarandy5977 It's not about a models, but about visual effects.
@@AlexanderJ Destination Moon was done by George Pal, who, before he got into the live-action movie biz, was a stop motion animator. The effects are really quite good in that film, and I don't think there's anyone alive at the time t hat could have done better. Combining live action, process shots, miniature work, stop motion, and a bunch of other stuff.
I'm not dissing our Soviet friend here, I'm simply saying that there were a lot of other people who were also doing good work throughout the 1950s.
@@mahatmarandy5977 Pavel Klushantsev is a master of visual effects. And the director of popular science films and educational films. He did not do science fiction. Therefore, he paid great attention to reality. By the way, the scientific adviser of this film was one of the engineers who built Sputnik.
This is fantastic!
Now that's a spaceship.
This has some of the best weightlessness special effects prior to Space Odyssey that I’ve ever seen.
Excellent film made just before human spaceflight became a reality. I believe there is a universal human desire to explore the Cosmos that is found in cultures around the world. Unfortunately, politics, funding and general public support have proven to be formidable obstacles to getting humanity out of LEO and exploring our solar system.
сдрассьти... котик на столе это "злее" всего- необходимый элемент интерьера!!!
Так все добро и наивно )
А на самом деле?
STANLEY KUBRICK brought me here.
Beautiful movie.
Очень интересно! Я люблю это видео! : )
Американойды из Голливуда присвоили сюжет этого научно -популярного фильма ==>>вот такое впечатление при сравнении этого фильма 1957 года с более поздними фильмами из Америки.
еще и мультик с планшетом paleofuture.gizmodo.com/how-russians-imagined-the-year-2017-in-1960-1790754031 тоже 1960
@@fairly75 Спасибо, Надин! Очень интересная ссылка! Лодки-кроты -- прям как в фильме "Матрица"...
Que ingenio, muy buena peli. el sueño de la ciencia imposible de alcanzar hasta ahora.2014-.
Spectators stand by to watch behind a chain fence.
Слава СССР! Великая страна, великий народ!
Their space control center had two knobs: Go! and Not Go! LOL
20:19 Guau! , hermoso diseño de la Estación Espacial. Increíble ,pero Los Rusos ya tenían bien claro como podía ser la conquista del espacio , y una visión muy real, casi como lo es hoy. Lindo corto,gracias-
Oui! Kubrick s'est officiellement inspiré des effets spéciaux inventés par Klushantsev. La centrifugeuse est utilisée ici pour la première fois avec les cosmonautes en apesanteur!
Very nice restoration and color. Wasn't George Pal doing about the same 6 years earlier?
First I think this is a fun and inventive piece cinema. Second all the comments that somehow Kubrick copied this is ludicrous. Kubrick via Clarke was influenced by the work of British Interplanetary Society and the promotional movies and TV made by Von Braun, all pre date this. It is likely this movie was influenced by those as well.
ROAD TO THE STARS owed most of its ideas about space travel/rocketry/exploration to Konstantin Tsiolkovsky. You might find the 1935 film COSMIC VOYAGE of interest, Tsiolkovsky served as an adviser on that film, which deals with weighlessness and a landing on the moon. ROAD also had the latest in rocket technology advise from experts in their own (russian) space program, which was in intense development at the time---the launch of Sputnik came while this film was being finished, and the director was asked to include references to it in his production.
Awesomes scenes of ingravity, that director and team was genius...
The subtitles here are too big, they take up a quarter of the screen or more
Because subtitles are not designed for mobile devices.
Редкий фильм!
А чё?
I uploaded the entire movie with hard encoded English subtitles but UA-cam banned it. A wonderful movie, better than Star Wars.
Clearly this movie influenced Kubrick greatly.
Well I´m not sure if he saw it.
I think I read somewhere that he had.
Peter Iasillo, Jr. "The final section of the film portrays the launching of the first Soviet man into space, the first space station, and the first landing on the moon. In creating this footage Klushantsev created marvellous special effects, using techniques copied by Stanley Kubrick ten years later for 2001: A Space Odyssey. Indeed, some sequences in 2001 seems a shot-for-shot duplication of Road to the Stars….." astronautix.com
and Russian articles about Klushantsev argue that Ridley Scott, George Lucas, Stanley Kubrick in an interviews to talk about the impact of Klushancev's movies on on them. It is also alleged that Ridley Scott was able to personally in Moscow talk to Klushantsev about his methods of creating effects. Is this a legend or an actual fact - I do not know. But re-edit of the films "Planeta Bur" and "Nebo Zovyot" for U.S. release shows that in the United States were well known with the Soviet sci-fi movies.
only we been first. -1956. But Kubrick - 1968. Understand, He (kubrick) - was simple plagiarism.
too first in world Russain aurtor invented a tablet in other film in 1960 paleofuture.gizmodo.com/how-russians-imagined-the-year-2017-in-1960-1790754031
Yes, point taken.
Very nice film ! but in the same time around 1955 Disney made space documentary films like that : man in space, man and the moon, Mars and beyond, Eyes in outer space, with the help of Werner von Braun team visionary ideas. See the DVDs Disney treasury, Tomorrow land : Disney in space and beyond
Yes, the US and the Soviets divided up the spoils of Nazi Germany in 1946. Which explains why they both developed fake space programs that look exactly alike. The Nazis were the original masters of fake propaganda; and the 2 victorious super powers couldn't resist continuing the legacy of big, bold lies.
smdahl Fake space program !!!!!????? the film is about dreams about space exploration in the future, but the space program of USA and URSS and others are perfectly real ! are you a hoax believers about that ???? serioulsy....follow the next missions, we will be on the moon and Mars soon after 2020-2030.
Goblin2 bis
You really think we'll be on the moon "soon after 2020-2030? So you are saying that we weren't on the moon in 1969?
smdahl Sorry, i should have said ''again'' in 2020-2030, for example to built a base, not just to put a flag on the moon by men as in 1969. For sure we will be on the moon (again) and on Mars for the first time ! do not doubt about that, you will see !
Goblin2 bis The US government signed an agreement in 1967 which forbids all nations building bases on the moon, because they knew, in 1967, that it was impossible to get their. The Soviets were about to prove this impossibility, so the US signed on the dotted line to keep them quiet.
"Отделилась первая ступень. Управляемая по радио она вернется на Землю"
А Илон Маск это видел? 🤔
в детстве :) И фильм «Небо зовет»
Та ён абасралси ат зависти😂😂
@@user-wu3yi5eq2e а унас в Украине с космосом все закончилось,все мы просрпли.
Where can we watch the full restored version
I don't think anyone has done a complete restoration of the film.
Awesome.......
jackamo23, I can send you file with this Russian subtitles.
Amazing, all the little similarities to 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Wow
Too laboriousness - I just do not have much free time. I hope that the new feature Automatic UA-cam Caption for Russian at someday will processing this video. I then save the automatic subtitles and edit it.
Do they realize that their "R"s are backward? My daughter used to do that when she was about 2 years old. It passed.
That is a great movie and maybe real reason for making Space Odisee 2001 by Stanley Kubrick
2020-й... Никто так никуда и не полетел. Только в кино...
Ну палятять исчо, палятять. От киринтин закончиса и сразу усе жилаючие палятять.👌
@@user-wu3yi5eq2e Эге-ж... На кладбища добре летять...
@@user-md6bp2io9n 🤣🤣
Oct. 1957 they sent the first man made object into orbit.
In space nobody can hear you scream.
I happy to see they also have heat and radiation proofglass window; ouf!
And smart enough to see thee advantage of a station upthere, make's one wonder if the "american" success was'nt rigged by real owners.... (or their invasion of others).
12:41 song?
Probably an original music for this film.
@@AlexanderJ Эта верна, и на фик нам не нужон ваш сонг👍
Destination Moon v=DsisGSBlQqo ? The main difference "Road to the Stars" is not Feature film.
Could somebody please synch the audio of Walt Disney's Man in Space episode 'Man and the Moon' with this? I think Uncle Walt Would've approved
Интересно, а ведь здесь показан планирующий вариант посадки, как у Бурана и Шаттлов
А так и планировали делать. Первый вариант корабля «Восток» был планирующий космический аппарат (ПКА) конструкции Павла Владимировича Цыбина. Но оказалось ,что проблема спуска намного больше чем это сразу казалось. Потому вопрос проблемы спуска решили простым шариком. А планирующий спуск отрабатывали на БОРе.
@@AlexanderJ Бедный Боря, усё на ём триниравались😕
To bad Russia could only do this in a film and not for real. Maybe we'd actually HAVE bases on the Moon and even Mars. I guess if NASA had had five Saturn's blow up, like the USSR had it's N-1's, they'd have given up on the Moon too.
Oh well.
space is not real...
and Rusia fakes a lot
1)Gagarin Hoax
2)Leonov hoax walk
3) Drawn of Earth
4) Stop Motion
5) Sputnik middle hoax
and then the USSR AMERICAN agreetment in 75
Lead weight has pressed them to stove benches! Precisely the Earth hsd strained all forces to return escaping captives!
it is good as documentary, but Kubrick was well ahead in 1969 with a real fiction with actors (with the help of very good scientists) in comparison of this kind of old stuff, netherless charming, particular the leaver suits in the spaceship !!!!!! but Kiurick must have seen this as well other space documentaries in the preparation of his marvellous film 2001.
прикольно деды развлекались.
Absolutely great stuff. Wish our teachers had shown films like this in NYC public schools when i was growing up.
American propaganda does nothing but poison the waters of the average citizens mind.
Why are the authorities so obsessed with endlessly repeating lies and deception. They mislead us and make us waste our lifetime with our minds full of misinformation.A holes!
Thanks and Aloha for showing some of the truth that our so called leaders refuse to let us SEE.
Wally Wood is looking down and smiling!
Люк на кожаных ремнях
Ну и шо? Зато посадка ощенама не абышная: мяханик, астанави Землю, я сайду😂😂
У них должен быть шлем танкиста
holy crap!!! THE CAT HAS FLEAS!!!
Space fleas :)
19:22 А где секретный отдели и шпиЁны?
And to think I’m 2021 we have people in the USA trying to tell us the earth is flat. The flat earth people just seek attention I direct them to these films and laugh at them
Ironic that in reality, the Russians ended up landing on Land.
The US landed in the Ocean.
It's kind of a documentary video. The cosmodrome was planned on the Black Sea coast. For technical reasons, its construction was not possible in this place and a different location was chosen in the semi-desert of Kazakhstan.
INCREDIBLE; Absolutely Incredible; ... NUFF Said ... “🍺 Dilly Dilly”❗ I
Parece ser ótimo.
Mas falta as legendas em Português.
Se possível poste mais filmes de ficção Russos mas legendados em Português.
It is almost impossible to find a translator from Russian into any language other than English.
"The own small screw?" Where the hell did that line come from?
"свой винтик" - this is russian idiom. They send their own small screw, as part of the construction of this spaceship. In other words: A lot of engineers and designers have built the spacecraft. Each built his own part of it. Some built large parts such as rocket engines or rocket stage, others built small units of a design.
Alexander J Interesting.
In the US we would say 'everyone had a hand in it'.
James Snee 'everyone had a hand in it' exactly literally corresponds to russian 'каждый приложил к этому руку' - is often used in a negative sense, when talking about corruption.
Alexander J
Ha! Again interesting.
Like 'everyone has a hand in your pocket'.
Todd VanSlyke added subtitles from www.opensubtitles.org. "Today, each of those involved, is sending their own small part
of this ship into space." Happy viewing.
"Space Force"!
Вот где снимал ИлонМаск свои финтифлюшки