Dale Vince | Manifesto | Green Gathering | 5 August 2023

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @AnnaatGetafix
    @AnnaatGetafix Рік тому +3

    We loved all the talks, this one especially, thank you Green Gathering. Can I ask, will you be putting the remaining talks up? I'm keen to see the person who filled the tbc slot on Sunday morning - he was excellent about immigration but I missed the start and don't know who he was

    • @GreenGatheringFestival
      @GreenGatheringFestival  Рік тому +2

      we're working the back log... all going to plan, this week

    • @AnnaatGetafix
      @AnnaatGetafix Рік тому +1

      Thank you so much, I keep talking about this to people and want to watch it again xx

    • @shanecollins12
      @shanecollins12 Рік тому

      Andrew Simms. ua-cam.com/video/5D88HaB87IQ/v-deo.html

  • @jansasak39
    @jansasak39 Рік тому

    Please invest in precision fermentation!

  • @leskuzyk2425
    @leskuzyk2425 Рік тому +2

    Good voice Dale. Good to hear your back story.

  • @noizydan
    @noizydan Рік тому

    Biogas is still a greenhouse gas, whether it is cows, grass, or ancient vegetation making it. It may have its place but heat pumps have to be the preferred option for heating. Electricity can be made with less greenhouse impact.

  • @condal32
    @condal32 Рік тому +2

    Hey, hey, an electric motorcycle! I'd by one. There's a few manufacturers out there but the big bike makers are mostly ignoring the obvious direct it's going in.

    • @maryhart9688
      @maryhart9688 Рік тому

      I think the main makers are having to do so now as there's a requirement for them to sell a certain percentage of elecric bikes..

  • @michaelrch
    @michaelrch Рік тому +3

    Great stuff but the political analysis is wrong IMO
    Which will be a greener government?
    1. A labour government with a majority of 150 where the (right wing, neoliberal) leadership can do anything it wants, which means very little, or
    2. A labour government with a majority of 40, which is about the size of the socialist campaign group) and 5-10 greens and another 10-20 progressive Libdems?
    Starmer, with Reeves and Streeting, has rowed back on everything progressive in their offering to the point that he is now even refusing to restore child benefits to 3+ kids. That is not for electoral advantage. It's because he and his handlers believe in austerity ideology.
    These people will not do anything like enough without being forced.

    • @noizydan
      @noizydan Рік тому +1

      Blue and red have both had their chance. Both have failed to step up for people. Voting for a less-worse party wont lead to better policies. Vote for the other parties based on policies not tribes.
      Blue and red need a smaller share of the seats going forward. This will be the fastest way to PR. Supporting big majorities only entrenches FPTP. Parties must be forced to work together. No party with a big majority would give up that power by choice.

    • @donttouchyerbumnsniffit
      @donttouchyerbumnsniffit Рік тому

      Do you think any other party other than Labour or Tories can win? That's the question?

    • @michaelrch
      @michaelrch Рік тому

      @@donttouchyerbumnsniffit no but then UKIP didn't win in 2015 - they got one MP, but they still got a Brexit referendum.
      If Labour lose lots of votes to the Greens, they will be forced to take their left wing supporters seriously.

  • @jamess1442
    @jamess1442 Рік тому

    Will the grass be affected by extreme weather caused by the climate crisis?