A Crucial Chess Principle About Tactics

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 кві 2022
  • This one mistake can cause you to miss tactics.
    ✅ 2 New Courses! ✅
    ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
    The Ultimate King's Indian:
    chessvibescourses.thinkific.c...
    ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
    1000 - 1500 Strategic Thinking Chess Course:
    chessvibescourses.thinkific.c...
    ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
    Patreon tournaments with Nelson:
    🔶 / chessvibes 🔶
    ☑️ Play Chess Here:
    chess.com?ref_id=5885046
    ☑️ Join Our Discord Here:
    / discord
    ☑️ Support Nelson Here:
    paypal.me/ChessVibes

КОМЕНТАРІ • 157

  • @DunklerZebralord
    @DunklerZebralord 2 роки тому +218

    This was so awesome. First the tactic was ok but a little dicey. Then the tactic was outright bad. Then the tactic was brilliant. All within the span of a few moves where optically the board barely changed. Really instructive stuff.

  • @chuckhanson7506
    @chuckhanson7506 2 роки тому +10

    Nice ideas!
    One observation.
    With the "middle move" check with knight, you actually had another pawn take check with knight.
    So it would've been 2 pawns for knight, still not the best.
    Thanks for the lesson.

  • @andrewbomkamp3708
    @andrewbomkamp3708 2 роки тому +30

    Absolutely insane, especially for a bullet game. Keep up the good content.

  • @trickyknights2226
    @trickyknights2226 2 роки тому +15

    This tactic really shows the true beauty of chess, how little things like if a rook is on a few squares to the left, it can change the entire game! Keep up the great work Nelson

  • @RR11333
    @RR11333 2 роки тому +12

    I like types of videos on this channel. Specific tactics are always nice, but getting down to the core principles behind them is even more useful.

  • @JusticeStiles
    @JusticeStiles 2 роки тому +10

    Chess vibes continues to be the best channel on UA-cam for beginning to intermediate players who want content to actually improve their game. Keep it up Nelson!

  • @acousticpon
    @acousticpon 2 роки тому +48

    In my opinion, you are a most talented teacher of the game and your research of old material is to be commended. Thank you 😊

  • @msvb2457
    @msvb2457 2 роки тому +3

    I haven't played chess with any level of seriousness in about a gazillion years, and I'm not really likely to. But I really enjoy these videos all the same. You do a great job on these, with a really nice eye for important things and great skill in explaining them. Awesome channel!

  • @RyanJFaulk
    @RyanJFaulk 2 роки тому +8

    I almost never look for in between moved. If I play them it's because I'm being forced to, somehow. This is a really helpful video!

  • @darrylkassle361
    @darrylkassle361 2 роки тому +2

    More great content. 110k subs you just keep growing as you well deserve, congrats!!!!

  • @robertgonsalves1966
    @robertgonsalves1966 2 роки тому +2

    It's an eye opener. Looking forward to more such tactics. Thanks

  • @yyyyyk
    @yyyyyk 2 роки тому +1

    Very cool! This is more advanced than the level of calculations that I usually do, so it's great to learn this type of strategic thinking.
    Thanks, NM Nelson!

  • @georgebush6002
    @georgebush6002 2 роки тому +8

    I don't think you made this video just to show off but I wouldn't blame you even if you did; that was pretty cool.

  • @joetucker971
    @joetucker971 2 роки тому +9

    This channel is absolutely amazing, you're so underappreciated and underrated. Keep it up!!

    • @darrylkassle361
      @darrylkassle361 2 роки тому +4

      Sometimes his vids are worth 3or 4 Levy videos put together in terms of really useful practical tips. Some of the bigger channels just put out any vid because of the fact that they simply believe a video is due whereas Nelson does it knowing it's worthwhile and useful

    • @DunklerZebralord
      @DunklerZebralord 2 роки тому +7

      @@darrylkassle361 Well yes and no. I do love me some Levy but the approach is different. Levy doesn't claim to make exclusively educationally content, he makes entertainment content whereas with Nelson it feels he leans much more into the educational aspect and is simply less of a loud bubbly personality than Levy (which btw I appreciate about Nelson, not hating).

  • @pamelahermano9298
    @pamelahermano9298 2 роки тому

    I’m working on my tactics right now and this was such a helpful video. Thank you for sharing.

  • @rajsrinivasan3973
    @rajsrinivasan3973 2 роки тому

    Very instructive lesson. Thank you very much Nelson!

  • @uxdsngr
    @uxdsngr 2 роки тому

    Awesome very insightful. I like how you evolved the lesson. This one sunk deep.

  • @FelixRigg
    @FelixRigg 2 роки тому

    Another terrific video with straightforward ‘take-aways’ for us all to carry with us forever. Thank you.

  • @christopherheckman7957
    @christopherheckman7957 Рік тому

    4:33 Even if Black doesn't move the bishop, White is still threatening 1. Nd5 Qxd2 2. Nxf7+ Kg8 Bxg7+, and after Black captures a piece and White captures the queen, White has won a pawn.
    Incidentally, if you'd like another German chess term beginning with Z to throw around (instead of "Zwangzug"), an "in between move" is also known as a "Zwischenzug".

  • @kmunson007
    @kmunson007 2 роки тому

    Great lesson there - thanks for sharing.

  • @ericf7571
    @ericf7571 2 роки тому

    Brilliant! Thank you

  • @cooljams_jams
    @cooljams_jams 2 роки тому +1

    This is the kind of mind that could predict how Momento was going to end in like the first 10 minutes.

  • @FelixRigg
    @FelixRigg 2 роки тому

    Thank you again. Good lesson, as ever.

  • @hanswust6972
    @hanswust6972 2 роки тому +1

    Amazing manoeuvres creating chances for tactical outcomes.

  • @ethandowler4669
    @ethandowler4669 2 роки тому

    I'm loving these real-life examples of games you've played recently. Very applicable!

  • @matthewteichert6631
    @matthewteichert6631 2 роки тому +1

    This is the first i have seen from you. You seem like a really good teacher.

  • @colliscarlitobrazil
    @colliscarlitobrazil 2 роки тому

    I'm glad I didn't stop watching, the first tactic was so obvious that I almost stopped watching thinking this was a video for beginners

  • @mateostudent7166
    @mateostudent7166 2 роки тому

    Great content very helpful. Thank you

  • @krishradio1
    @krishradio1 2 роки тому +2

    The subtleties of chess are like an ocean. Great lesson Nelson.

  • @SGT_Brobaker
    @SGT_Brobaker 2 роки тому +3

    Many thanks for your great teaching videos. Your channel is one of the best I know. But what I'm thinking for a while is, what is the meaning of your white/red chess pieces in the background?

  • @nomoreblitz
    @nomoreblitz Рік тому

    An excellent example of an important point. The next challenge is how we drill the idea.

  • @CoinCollectingCollege
    @CoinCollectingCollege 2 роки тому

    Nice job with the presentation. I was very comfortable soaking up good information at a good pace. I watch a lot of UA-cam Chess videos, and this is the best imho.

  • @themanthattimeforgot2836
    @themanthattimeforgot2836 2 роки тому

    Love your videos, thank you.

  • @GAMEINN-cf8yy
    @GAMEINN-cf8yy 2 роки тому

    I can see why your channel is growing😎👍Haven't clicked on one of your vids since you were at 60k subs. Well Done!!!

  • @ericm1839
    @ericm1839 2 роки тому

    Not a necessarily hard tactic for anyone who does their puzzles, but really highlights the importance of keeping a mental note of what tactics/ideas you have. Just telling yourself "oh i have this disocovered attack on the queen which sets up a two-move attack on his queen. Realistically (in a non-bullet game) this should have forced the bishop trade which is already advantageous for you. The fact that your opponent missing it gives you a mate threat or their queen is icing on the cake.

  • @miketedder1079
    @miketedder1079 2 роки тому

    Good video. Its amazing how many times I have had to abandon a tactic that jus would not work only to see it come to life a few moves later.

  • @davedjl3387
    @davedjl3387 Рік тому

    Quality, depth, and accuracy, you the man.

  • @stevencrabbe
    @stevencrabbe 2 роки тому +1

    I've never learned so much from one teacher. You make me smarter every day!

  • @christianhernandez199
    @christianhernandez199 2 роки тому

    Thx dude, that was a very interesting position.

  • @briandoile5011
    @briandoile5011 2 роки тому

    Wow. Your board vision is soo good.

  • @southernrun9048
    @southernrun9048 2 роки тому

    Great video covering some nice tactic work

  • @danielbspinola
    @danielbspinola 2 роки тому

    Awesome! Excellent example. I won a game today with similar tatics. Great game!

  • @millisock
    @millisock 2 роки тому +1

    I love you and I love your channel. This is the best teaching of *ANY* content, not just chess. Just brilliant teaching. Crystal clear, a 1-year old can understand things if you're the teacher. Thank you, please keep up the great work!

  • @dkpandey1996
    @dkpandey1996 8 місяців тому

    Great stuff!

  • @mattmiller1179
    @mattmiller1179 2 роки тому +1

    At 3:46 you still have the in between Nxg6+, which is still down material but potentially playable and interesting since you destroy blacks pawn structure. 2 key protective pawns for a knight? I'd be tempted to do it. Especially at 1 minute games where there may not be time to figure out how to take advantage of a material difference in a weakened position.

  • @clintongryke6887
    @clintongryke6887 2 роки тому

    Very instructive.

  • @hueycotton
    @hueycotton 2 роки тому +3

    Nelson, I've been trying to reach 1000 off my own intuition for at least 3 months. I haven't really studied openings at all, I just wing it. I also watch your videos to understand the basics. And I don't know chess annotation for shit lol
    I'm wondering if you think it's best to get passed this barrier I've hit by actually studying openings and learing chess annotation, or if it's more beneficial to learn on my own like I have been. It feels like I'm shooting myself in the foot not studying but I also want to develop my own 'chess instinct' if that makes sense.
    Signed,
    That guy stuck at 900

    • @hoodieking4901
      @hoodieking4901 2 роки тому

      I’m not ChessVibes but I can confidently say that at your level learning theory and book moves for openings is not good. You need to learn basic opening principles such as center control, piece development, and early castling.

    • @hueycotton
      @hueycotton 2 роки тому +1

      @@hoodieking4901 So then... I shouldn't study? lol My memorization is good, so I feel confident that I can learn any opening I study. I can probably remember different variations as well. But that feels boring and uncreative. I'd much rather figure it out on my own, which is why i struggle. I'm just wondering if it's important to learn on your own, or if this game is really all about memorization.
      Also, I understand basic concepts like controlling the center, developing, and (sometimes) castling early. I mostly struggle in the middle game with blunders and overly ambitious plays. I want to be able to see these blunders/bad sacs without knowing theory, but it's really hard.
      Now that I think of it, my real question is: Should I even bother being creative if I'm struggling so much? Or should I just play/learn like everyone else?

    • @ChessVibesOfficial
      @ChessVibesOfficial  2 роки тому +3

      Check out my series on breaking past rating levels. But the short answer is the most important thing you can do is work on not making mistakes in your games. Annotation doesn't matter right now. If you enjoy learning openings, then learn a few, if not, don't sweat it. Just try to make less and less mistakes. Good luck!

    • @hueycotton
      @hueycotton 2 роки тому

      @@ChessVibesOfficial Okay, I'll just work on taking my time then. Usually I make mistakes because I'm moving like it's bullet chess even though I play 30 minute rapid games. lol
      I'll use my clock (and hopefully my head) more. Also thank god you said annotation doesn't matter because I do NOT wanna learn that crap right now. Thanks for replying man, you're a good teacher

  • @pdm12345
    @pdm12345 2 роки тому

    Helpful video! Is there a way you could give the board higher resolution in the video, please? You appear to be sharp, though.

  • @chamaraliyanage726
    @chamaraliyanage726 2 роки тому

    Thanks Nelson 👍

  • @houssemzouaghi
    @houssemzouaghi 2 роки тому

    best chess channel !! I went from 1200 blitz to 1400 watching your videos thanks alot !

  • @tom-qj6uw
    @tom-qj6uw 2 роки тому

    @3:30 1.Nd5 is playable! After 1...Qxd2 you just play 2.Nxf6+ Bxf6 (2.... ef6: 3.Bxd2 is good for White) 3.Bxd2 is absolutely ok and perhaps slightly better for White since Black cannot win a pawn with 3.... Bxb2 4.Rb1 Bf6? (better 4... c5 !?) 5. Bxf7+ Kxf7 6.Rxb8

  • @guitarfreak80ftw
    @guitarfreak80ftw 2 роки тому

    3:41 | here you’d make another in between move with Kxg6 check. That way you’re trading two pawns for the night then you recapture the Queen.
    Not that important but it’s a key concept if you blunder and need to save face as much as possible

  • @danielengelhardt7453
    @danielengelhardt7453 2 роки тому

    Thanks for another great video. I was getting burned out on chess until I watched your video and now I am jazzed to play again.

  • @fogowar2022
    @fogowar2022 2 роки тому

    When white puts a bishop on c4, I instantly think of Nxe4, followed by d5. Common motif in KID and Dragon. Might not be best here but I'm definitely thinking it.

  • @wallyemerson
    @wallyemerson 2 роки тому

    I love your videos, so clear and well presented. Why does the chess set behind you have red and white and black pieces?

  • @j.dragon651
    @j.dragon651 2 роки тому

    I have won a few games with those tactics. There was one guy I could never beat no matter how many games I played him. He was one of those central park guys who came up to Woodstock for the summers sometimes. His name was, is, Mitch, damn him.

  • @luke31ish
    @luke31ish Рік тому

    I've been going through chess channels and I like the way you explain things. I'm a 1500- ish level player trying to break into upper teens.

  • @donsmith3857
    @donsmith3857 2 роки тому

    i dont even look at any other chess videos except gotham because hes pretty funny and entertaining, but for instruction, Nelson is the man--u make all these abstract ideas so easy to understand and fun! youre a natural born teacher

  • @stevesidare2493
    @stevesidare2493 2 роки тому

    Seems like a cross between a discovered attack and a double attack. I guess that's what a zwischenzug is.

  • @KurtofTrades
    @KurtofTrades 2 роки тому +1

    Good stuff

  • @rajagopalanta
    @rajagopalanta 2 роки тому

    @5:35 .. Why not Qxd5. I mean you still loose the queen (against a bishop and knight)... But you can avoid the checkmate.. It still leaves black in bad position but they survived, and are up a bishop and knight for a queen..

  • @nathand4937
    @nathand4937 2 роки тому +1

    When i see the miniature , i recognize my position against an opponent in N4 french. My bishop was on e2 and not b3 , and his rook on f8. And i play knight d5 instantly 😅😅

  • @jaywaup
    @jaywaup 2 роки тому

    This video makes me understand why I need to delay tactics

  • @katierumlock6645
    @katierumlock6645 2 роки тому

    Imagine resigning in a bullet match

  • @BorowiaknieruchomosciPlKalisz
    @BorowiaknieruchomosciPlKalisz 2 роки тому

    I just want to point that He've made all of this moves in 17 seconds. :D AWESOME!

  • @fardadhajirostami7104
    @fardadhajirostami7104 2 роки тому

    3:44 you're technically trading knight for 2 pawns since you can play knight g6

  • @andrewmorrisondesign
    @andrewmorrisondesign 2 роки тому +1

    Brilliant

  • @kemritwithgunbutrebornasle4021
    @kemritwithgunbutrebornasle4021 2 роки тому

    Your videos helped me break 1300 on lichess, thanks Nelson, also I love your vids.

  • @drazenano409
    @drazenano409 2 роки тому

    cool idea

  • @leechap3
    @leechap3 2 роки тому

    Very cool!

  • @ilyaibrahimovic9842
    @ilyaibrahimovic9842 2 роки тому

    Very funny resignation!

  • @gossedejong9248
    @gossedejong9248 2 роки тому

    brilliant

  • @tixeright9120
    @tixeright9120 2 роки тому

    why do people resign when there is a beautiful finish. Is there a ranking reason to do that?

  • @lolobuggah2670
    @lolobuggah2670 2 роки тому

    You make me feel so good inside.

  • @cutthat4643
    @cutthat4643 2 місяці тому

    brilliant stuff, I didnt see it

  • @chrisrichardbasco1302
    @chrisrichardbasco1302 2 роки тому

    a great tactic so difficult for me to see

  • @ginubinukb2652
    @ginubinukb2652 Рік тому

    3:22 nd5 and then nf6 and take back Queen with bishop

  • @hurfery
    @hurfery 2 роки тому

    Incredible tactic. :)

  • @jotarokujo7955
    @jotarokujo7955 2 роки тому

    After 8 seconds "this is the moment were we start get critical into the game" lol

  • @darrylkassle361
    @darrylkassle361 2 роки тому

    Btw what's happening with the series whereby different positions are analysed???

  • @natara1976
    @natara1976 2 роки тому

    He could actually take the knight with the queen, you take the queen with the bishop, he take the bishop with a pawn.
    Not great but still winnable.

  • @domin3k535
    @domin3k535 2 роки тому +1

    i wanna just say something is going on in the next video or in the 9 video (cause of pawns) because another piece are red and thats it, like last piece will be red or the last pawn will be red and something will happend. I know it -_-

  • @Verbalaesthet
    @Verbalaesthet 2 роки тому

    Very nice

  • @pairot01
    @pairot01 2 роки тому

    Not all knight checkmates are smother mates. The king must be surrounded entirely by his own pieces to be a smother mate.

  • @ejwhite
    @ejwhite 2 роки тому

    Great video, thanks! Why couldn't black slide the rook over to e8 and protect the square from the knight landing mate? Edit: they would lose the queen, makes sense now

  • @Stefan-xh1hi
    @Stefan-xh1hi 2 роки тому

    Pretty sure its actually the hyper accelerated dragon but yea

  • @pierrenagonio1120
    @pierrenagonio1120 2 роки тому

    nice one

  • @ryoshinbig846
    @ryoshinbig846 2 роки тому

    That's fucking great

  • @ezekielbrockmann114
    @ezekielbrockmann114 2 роки тому

    Instead of ... bH8
    Wouldn't ... rB7 be a better response?

  • @creepy3ric
    @creepy3ric 2 роки тому +1

    Whenever I see my opponent outplayed me and got me into a nice forced mating sequence, I don't resign but play it til the check mate just to appreciate the good play. Anyone else doing that?

    • @ndmeyer66
      @ndmeyer66 2 роки тому

      I don't as much as I should, because I get butt-hurt. But I respect you for doing it and I wish I did it more.

  • @acklackl
    @acklackl 2 роки тому

    I guess Nxg6+ you get 2 pawns for the knight, not good but better than 1 pawn

  • @MrChrisdube
    @MrChrisdube 2 роки тому

    I would guess this comes up in Pirc 150 attack and/or the Austrian Attack.

  • @carlosdarwin5882
    @carlosdarwin5882 2 роки тому

    i like that.

  • @FloydMaxwell
    @FloydMaxwell 2 роки тому

    Excellent illustration. BTW, black could take the knight on d5, queen is taken, but then with a recapture he is only down a piece. In bullet that is still playable. Just saying.

  • @mk7073
    @mk7073 2 роки тому

    Cool!

  • @petesmith147
    @petesmith147 2 роки тому

    Why is only one of the rooks red?

  • @davidyoung6331
    @davidyoung6331 2 роки тому

    It reminds me a bit of game 8 of the 1972 world championship match between Fischer and Spassky. Can anyone verify this?

  • @EarlSmith2469
    @EarlSmith2469 2 роки тому

    Nd5 ! Knife d5. That's not a knife, this is a knife!

  • @motornade277
    @motornade277 2 роки тому

    nice

  • @berobeer6285
    @berobeer6285 Рік тому

    With levy ,hikauru and alex