First Shahed 136 Downed by Electronic Warfare (Recovered Intact)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 січ 2024
  • Ukraine shared photos of the first Russian Shahed 136 downed by electronic warfare jammers rather than missiles. The drone was recovered intact.
    Support the Channel
    www.patreon.com/user?u=80032585
    www.buymeacoffee.com/suchomim...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 470

  • @zachboyd4749
    @zachboyd4749 3 місяці тому +540

    I’m a long time flyer of RC planes, and I speak from experience that when plastic or carbon fiber props hit the ground when they’re spinning, they shatter like glass into a thousand pieces. That’s probably why you don’t see the props on these drones, they’re spread out all across the ground now.

    • @Ganiscol
      @Ganiscol 3 місяці тому +17

      That may be so, but I doubt they use carbon fiber or plastic for those. I'm more inclined to believe it would be some metallic material. These arent toy planes after all in terms of mass. Just look at the inefficient shape of the wing's leading edge, most likely to maximize fuel capacity.
      Still, it could very well also be the jet engine model just upside down so we cant see the intake.

    • @ANO-.-NYM
      @ANO-.-NYM 3 місяці тому +69

      @@Ganiscol Aircraft propellers are made using composite materials. Mostly carbon fiber over a core.
      Some do use aluminum but I doubt it here. Even wood is still used.
      Actually I just googled some pictures, and you can find a destroyed one with the propeller painted white and the inside being brown wood colour.
      So coming from Iran and a one-off product it's probably cheap so wood sounds plausible.

    • @Itsjustme-Justme
      @Itsjustme-Justme 3 місяці тому +20

      I'm almost sure to have seen them with wooden props. A wooden prop still is the most light weight and cheapest option when it comes to a propeller in the required size.

    • @stevefox7793
      @stevefox7793 3 місяці тому +1

      God bless the King

    • @Itsjustme-Justme
      @Itsjustme-Justme 3 місяці тому

      @@Ganiscol They technically are quite big, but not extremely big models. The piston engine is the same size as in the very lightest class of ultralight aircraft. There are no metal propellers used in that power class because metal propellers are heavy and very expensive. The most used material is wood and fiber reinforced plastics have some market share too.
      The thick airfoil isn't exactly inefficient, it simply is designed for rather low speed. That kind of airfoil in a delta usually offers very forgiving stall characteristings, which is great for the very short take off rails and small RATO unit they use to get those drones airborne. And it offers huge useful internal space and at the same time allows for an extremely simple, light weight wing spar. The wing design is almost perfect for the initial, piston powered Shahed. Especially when you consider that they had a wingspan limit because that drone is designed to fit unter the tarp of a standard semi truck. These things fly just below 200 km/h, which is perfectly fine for that kind of airfoil. For the jet powered variety it's quite far from being ideal because it has a lot of drag a high speed. If they are smart and under massive time pressure, they stick to the proven airframe and control system and add a really small jet engine that's maybe good for 300km/h. Using a bigger engine for more speed isn't efficient with that wing, it burns fuel for nothing. If time pressure isn't their no.1 issue, designing the thinnest possible wing that still houses the required amount of fuel is a way better option.

  • @PutinsFailures
    @PutinsFailures 3 місяці тому +153

    I love how you end every video the same way. Seriously. Not being sarcastic or flippant or whatever-I genuinely like that you end every video with “so that’s it for this video. I hope you found it interesting, and take care everybody.” It’s calmingly reassuring.

  • @brookwhiteman9810
    @brookwhiteman9810 3 місяці тому +130

    You will notice in the reports about Russia's missile attacks recently that there is a lot of missiles that don't get shot down even when the casualties are low and this is most likely due to EW as well, Ukraine has been funding the production of thousands of EW systems which they have been placing all over the country and they seem to be very effective.

    • @cristo6007
      @cristo6007 3 місяці тому +24

      I believe United 24 has a video out about how Ukraine has surpassed Russia in the EW field 🤞

    • @Ganiscol
      @Ganiscol 3 місяці тому +23

      Would be about time, next we'll see the decline of effectiveness of small drones on the battlefield because of more prevalent jamming - I would hope Ukraine has the upper hand there as well until we can supply them with old fashion equipment in the quantities they need to keep on grinding the enemy down like they do now. Either way, things will change again this year, hopefully in the right direction.

    • @brookwhiteman9810
      @brookwhiteman9810 3 місяці тому +36

      @@Ganiscol if Ukraine didn't have the upper hand then they do now because recently 60 terabytes of info from the company that produces Russia's EW systems and Orlan drones was handed over to Ukraine in return for asylum for one of the main technicians, the reason that ukraine was able to hit those very important ports (leningrad and tuapse) with drones is because they are using radar jamming or spoofing drones, i know what it looks like and that its made by ukrjet but the only info that has been given is "it greatly improves the survivability of our aircraft", they said this because they also use it on the front line as well to keep their aircraft safe. It seems that Ukraine has the upper hand for now and hopefully Ukraine can keep the lead.

    • @barragan9652
      @barragan9652 3 місяці тому +3

      Rusia ya valió V3R64, sí está semana atacaron una de sus refinerías más grandes con drones en San Petenburgos.😂😂😂😂

    • @johnschwartz8015
      @johnschwartz8015 3 місяці тому +2

      Right on!

  • @stephenoneill245
    @stephenoneill245 3 місяці тому +161

    According to Denis Davydov's report today, the jamming devices used on these drones were supplied by the UK. That might help in identifying them.

    • @davidwhitehead9169
      @davidwhitehead9169 3 місяці тому +24

      I am sure the jammers have the codename Strawberry

    • @JuanSanchez-ik7wx
      @JuanSanchez-ik7wx 3 місяці тому +6

      you mean Denys the Deserter?

    • @baldyslapnut.
      @baldyslapnut. 3 місяці тому +19

      ​@@JuanSanchez-ik7wx Surely you're Juan Kerr?

    • @AdrianBoyko
      @AdrianBoyko 3 місяці тому +2

      @@JuanSanchez-ik7wx What did he do to deserve that? I quit watching him a year ago.

    • @stevefox7793
      @stevefox7793 3 місяці тому +5

      God bless the King.
      UK are one of the best.

  • @bremnersghost948
    @bremnersghost948 3 місяці тому +386

    As a Brit it annoys the hell out of me that the Sh1thead Drones look like crappy RC Vulcans ;-)

    • @larryclemens1850
      @larryclemens1850 3 місяці тому +17

      Delta wings offer good stability, ŕange and capacity. (Brits aren't the only ones to use this - avro arrow, saab, McDonnel douglas...)

    • @AstroGremlinAmerican
      @AstroGremlinAmerican 3 місяці тому +27

      A Vulcan is featured in the James Bond movie "Thunderball." Always thought it looked cool.

    • @bremnersghost948
      @bremnersghost948 3 місяці тому +11

      @@larryclemens1850 Indeed, at least you got the joke :)

    • @portaltwo
      @portaltwo 3 місяці тому +16

      I've thought that same thing! 😅
      I'm Canadian, but I remember the Vulcans from air shows when I was kid. I always loved the elegant and functional design.

    • @Frombie_01
      @Frombie_01 3 місяці тому +22

      Mate, did you think that the Iranians or Russians would have an original idea? (Or the Chinese for that matter.)

  • @tumbullweed
    @tumbullweed 3 місяці тому +247

    Seeing people standing by it gives us a true scale of the size of it 👍🏼🇬🇧🇺🇦

    • @firstnamelastname8439
      @firstnamelastname8439 3 місяці тому +8

      And that scale is why its not effective for the US to also go all in on drones.
      When you have to ship your weapons across the planet, 1 cruise missile that can hit your target is better use of your logistics than having to ship 10 of these drones to hit the same target, because 9 of them will get shot down.
      Also, the US doesn't have the option of simply slapping drone launchers on the backs of pickups - the US generally has to attack from aircraft or ships, and cheap simple dromes like this will subject the launch platform to far more risk than a more expensive and more capable weapon.

    • @peterebel7899
      @peterebel7899 3 місяці тому +12

      @@firstnamelastname8439 How many drones can you buy for a single cruise missile?
      Drones are the future.

    • @DavidGirling
      @DavidGirling 3 місяці тому

      @@firstnamelastname8439 But if you can buy 1000 drones for the price of a cruise missile you can afford to lose some each time. A cruise missile only hits one target, even if it takes 10 drones to hit that same target you still have 990 left to hit another 99 targets, but if the first drone gets a lucky knock out you have 999 to use on other targets. from what I've seen on this channel they have been destroying oil refineries and storage, and military headquarters with no more than 4 drones which is much cheaper than using a cruise missile to do the same job.

    • @skipperg4436
      @skipperg4436 3 місяці тому +3

      @@peterebel7899 and the difference between drone and cruise missile is?.. =)

    • @dennisyoung4631
      @dennisyoung4631 3 місяці тому +3

      Bigger than I thought they were!

  • @virtual2152
    @virtual2152 3 місяці тому +55

    Boffin - English (Gr.Brit.) [slang] = A scientist or technician, especially one engaged in military research.

    • @StreuB1
      @StreuB1 3 місяці тому +3

      Typically kept in the basement or in low light, always tinkering on something.

    • @chrisdebeyer1108
      @chrisdebeyer1108 3 місяці тому +1

      A really hopeless name given to smart people by dumb people to help them feel better.
      Leads to treatment of people like Alan Turing and J Robert Oppenheimer.

    • @Tomartyr
      @Tomartyr 3 місяці тому +2

      @@chrisdebeyer1108 Alan Turing's mistreatment had more to do with homophobia tbh

    • @fredbecker607
      @fredbecker607 3 місяці тому +1

      As colonials, we don't hear that term very of5en. Cheers mate.

    • @josephpadula2283
      @josephpadula2283 2 місяці тому

      I never heard the term in us until I watched the Jimmy stewart movie
      No Highway in the Sky (also known as No Highway) is a 1951 black-and-white aviation drama film directed by Henry Koster from a screenplay by R. C. Sherriff, Oscar Millard, and Alec Coppel, based on the 1948 novel No Highway by Nevil Shute. The film stars James Stewart, Marlene Dietrich, Glynis Johns, Jack Hawkins, Janette Scott, Elizabeth Allan, Ronald Squire, and Jill Clifford.
      All about boffins!

  • @jeff6633
    @jeff6633 3 місяці тому +48

    I never realized how big they were, either. If true that's outstanding if Ukraine has a lot of these jammers.

    • @Dark_Bandon
      @Dark_Bandon 3 місяці тому +1

      That's what i wish my first girlfriend said about my peanuts.🥜 🤣🤣🤣

    • @robertokandal
      @robertokandal 3 місяці тому

      when they are jammed they fall and when they fall they explode,, the sizes do not match also engines.. look another ucranica joke they are always lying to europe : deceivers--

  • @engleharddinglefester4285
    @engleharddinglefester4285 3 місяці тому +65

    Congratulations and Slava Ukraini.

    • @beachbum77979
      @beachbum77979 3 місяці тому +4

      Heroyam Slava!

    • @alexei35100Ivanov
      @alexei35100Ivanov 2 місяці тому

      ​@@beachbum77979сала хероям, сала...
      А вот России слава...🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

  • @TheLDunn1
    @TheLDunn1 3 місяці тому +57

    Elsewhere, it’s been suggested that the UK has given Ukraine electronic warfare equipment that was responsible for bringing these drones down. No idea if it’s true, just advising what I’ve heard elsewhere

    • @ownpetard8379
      @ownpetard8379 3 місяці тому +2

      The Ukrs would want that version to get out.

  • @AstroGremlinAmerican
    @AstroGremlinAmerican 3 місяці тому +19

    Now that's what I call a great "jam session"!

    • @user-vh1qp1uz2d
      @user-vh1qp1uz2d 3 місяці тому

      How do you like your missiles, "Withjamin".

  • @evanwarrenchuk4003
    @evanwarrenchuk4003 3 місяці тому +56

    I had no idea that those drones were that big they look so small Slava Ukraine

  • @otpyrcralphpierre1742
    @otpyrcralphpierre1742 3 місяці тому +28

    Excellent!

  • @Mirakolis
    @Mirakolis 3 місяці тому +20

    I‘ve heard some rumors about Ukraine’s electronic warfare systems getting better to the point where they are able to intercept not just drones but also missiles. If this is to be true then that would be huge news since much less physical air defence is needed.

    • @stefanth8596
      @stefanth8596 3 місяці тому

      Did not know missiles were radio controlled

    • @u2bear377
      @u2bear377 3 місяці тому +4

      @@stefanth8596 Missiles [may] use GPS / Glonass / whatever.

    • @jannovak7024
      @jannovak7024 3 місяці тому +1

      As far as I understand, they will disrupt the satellite navigation of the missile, the missile will switch to inertial navigation and accumulate a significant deviation in the target. A clever solution, but suitable only for the protection of point targets (not area ones), such as an electrical substation in the fields for example.

    • @jhonbus
      @jhonbus 2 місяці тому +1

      @@jannovak7024 You can do slightly trickier things than just block the satellite reception too. Presumably these things navigate using GPS or GLONASS, including for their altitude information. It's quite easy at close range to overpower the signal being received from the sat constellation and if you know exactly what you're doing inject false data, tricking the drone into doing something it's not supposed to (eg crashing)

  • @sherryberry2394
    @sherryberry2394 3 місяці тому +8

    Thanks as always for your report, and for keeping the details quiet.❤

  • @deang1004
    @deang1004 3 місяці тому +4

    This is huge. Thanks for sharing this.

  • @marley2319
    @marley2319 3 місяці тому +1

    Slavs Ukraine from the uk 🇬🇧

  • @iamTheSnark
    @iamTheSnark 3 місяці тому +36

    Must be jazz musicians. They're good at jam sessions.

    • @lesbrunswick5137
      @lesbrunswick5137 3 місяці тому

      lol. Here's my favorite jazz singer in a jam session with her musicians ua-cam.com/video/80f3t3dmBbk/v-deo.html

    • @CZpersi
      @CZpersi 3 місяці тому +1

      Their artillery makes them quite heavy on percussion instruments.

  • @Fubar2024
    @Fubar2024 3 місяці тому +4

    Ooooh nice!!! Return to sender!! 🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @logan56
    @logan56 3 місяці тому

    One of your best. Thank you

  • @StretchMedia
    @StretchMedia 3 місяці тому +13

    I'd like to hear if there are still western components being used in these

  • @olegue3554
    @olegue3554 3 місяці тому +2

    Does anybody else randomly gets unsubscribed from this channel?
    Great reporting as always Suchomimus! Thanks for your reporting!

  • @grrfy
    @grrfy 3 місяці тому +8

    The dark one looks like an upside down 238 looking at vent locations compared to photographs.

  • @timcheeseman2956
    @timcheeseman2956 3 місяці тому +29

    Would be good if they could jam and control these so that they just turn around and return to sender

    • @gotanon9659
      @gotanon9659 3 місяці тому +1

      These are One way attack drones they do not know where they are launched from exactly

  • @ScreamingReelsTV
    @ScreamingReelsTV 3 місяці тому +39

    i wonder how much off the shelf electronics are inside them...

    • @Conservator.
      @Conservator. 3 місяці тому +15

      Close to 100% I think.

    • @ttpechon2535
      @ttpechon2535 3 місяці тому +7

      Imagine Ukrainian engineers open it up and just find a f*cking Rasberry Pi with some cheap IMUs badly soldered on

    • @katiehettinger7857
      @katiehettinger7857 3 місяці тому +3

      Does Iran have access to Western electronics since they are under sanctions. Back in the 1960s and 1970s, befor the Sha fell, Iranian electrical engineers were studying in the US. In theory, they could have developed their own technology.🤔

    • @u2bear377
      @u2bear377 3 місяці тому +4

      A couple of washing machine control boards, a Wi-Fi router (cheap one) and a late Soviet-era electronic alarm clock. ;)

    • @DUKE_of_RAMBLE
      @DUKE_of_RAMBLE 3 місяці тому +5

      ​@@katiehettinger7857As we've seen, sanctions only really stop _easily_ procuring what's needed. It's more symbolic, at least when it comes to certain things. They'll still acquire the things they need through third parties, or most likely even shell corporations.
      Even if they had people capable of designing, I don't know if Iran has any semiconductor fabs to physically _create_ all the stuff they would need to build the electronics in these.

  • @jcresap2077
    @jcresap2077 3 місяці тому +6

    Nice of them to enhance the IR signature with a jet engine for the MANPADS.

    • @CraigTheBrute-yf7no
      @CraigTheBrute-yf7no 2 місяці тому

      You ain’t shooting down a jet powered drone swarm at night with a MANPAD. Maybe a $5 million PATRIOT missile. Which is the whole point.

  • @134StormShadow
    @134StormShadow 3 місяці тому +12

    Having seen the remains of one of these things up very close (ie hands on), the amount of cabling and wiring inside them is quite surprising - as is the poor 1950s style quality and type of connectors on the wiring. The one I saw had the central core remains of the propeller still attached - it was most definitely wood.

    • @Polkem1
      @Polkem1 2 місяці тому

      explain poor 1950s style quality?

    • @jhonbus
      @jhonbus 2 місяці тому

      I'm guessing they use actuators that are a bit more heavy duty and... rustic... than the high tech lightweight gear you'd see in the RC aviation hobby industry. Presumably this all uses beefier wiring and the perhaps slighly outdated hardware and construction techniques you'd imagine the Iranian designers and engineers are accustomed to.

    • @Polkem1
      @Polkem1 2 місяці тому

      @@jhonbus yeah I guess so, as long as it works I guess. Pretty sure that drone can lift 20kg or somewhere around that number.

  • @Vatniks_are_clowns
    @Vatniks_are_clowns 3 місяці тому +3

    Thank you for your videos man

  • @paulmurray8922
    @paulmurray8922 3 місяці тому +15

    I hope they have or are working on a fairly portable one for the Lancets.

  • @Itsjustme-Justme
    @Itsjustme-Justme 3 місяці тому +9

    3 different. One dark grey with damaged nose in snow, one light grey and intact in snow, one dark grey and intact without snow.
    The intact ones look like piston powered ones, look at that bumb on the extreme rear. The damaged one maybe is a jet powered one, laying upside down, but if I had to guess by the shape of the rear end, I'll rather go for a piston engined one laying upside down.
    Not seeing the propeller probably is easy to explain. The engine mount doesn't appear to be the strongest. There are plenty of photos of shot down Shahed wrecks with their whole engine missing. From my RC modelling experience, deltas with rear mounted engine usually have a center of gravity issue. When you can't fully compensate by adding weight to the nose, you have to save weight at the rear end.
    An interesting detail is that round device in the damaged one. Is that the warhead? If so, I'm surprised. I didn't think they would use a purpose built warhead for such a low cost design. I was expecting to find a modified grenade.
    They are pretty large. Just as large as they can be to still fit inside a European standard truck. Wingspan should be just shy of 2,5 meters.

    • @MyFiddlePlayer
      @MyFiddlePlayer 3 місяці тому +1

      Yes, I too thought that there were 3 different drones here, one of which was a jet drone flipped updise down.

  • @buzzabuzza3494
    @buzzabuzza3494 3 місяці тому +31

    Slava Ukraine 👏👏👏🇺🇦🇬🇧

    • @beachbum77979
      @beachbum77979 3 місяці тому +3

      Slava Ukraini !
      Heroyam Slava !

  • @ianwalton284
    @ianwalton284 3 місяці тому +5

    Return to sender!!!!!

  • @cosak23
    @cosak23 3 місяці тому +2

    not tight lipped at all . in this instance drone jamming tech was from UK Glory to free Ukraine

  • @markmonaghan2309
    @markmonaghan2309 3 місяці тому +2

    Fantastic thanks again

  • @t23001
    @t23001 3 місяці тому

    Yikes! Nice catch. Lots of valuable information to be had.

  • @johannesschubert403
    @johannesschubert403 3 місяці тому +12

    Ooh, yeah
    Well, alright
    We're jammin'
    I wanna jam it with you… ❤🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

    • @u2bear377
      @u2bear377 3 місяці тому

      Hope you like jammin' too... ;)

  • @theperfectbanjo8610
    @theperfectbanjo8610 3 місяці тому +1

    Great work

  • @Stefan_Kawalec
    @Stefan_Kawalec 3 місяці тому +4

    Now we can have a full inspection of this "Perzzian-Ruzzian" colab.

  • @anadin0612
    @anadin0612 3 місяці тому

    Thank you good sir

  • @edwardtobin169
    @edwardtobin169 3 місяці тому +11

    I have question in head and you answered on screen lol 😂

  • @racebiketuner
    @racebiketuner 3 місяці тому

    Thanks again.

  • @comicomment
    @comicomment 3 місяці тому +2

    The men feel comfortable standing in groups next to the warhead.

  • @eginbott6804
    @eginbott6804 3 місяці тому +5

    In the treeline on the right side of the *no snow* clip, there is what looks like a vehicle with a pole mounted antenna....

    • @suchomimus9921
      @suchomimus9921  3 місяці тому +1

      good spot--I think that might be a radar. Looks a bit like the Giraffe radar

  • @charliemanson4808
    @charliemanson4808 3 місяці тому +5

    It'll be interesting to see where all the component parts come from....

    • @u2bear377
      @u2bear377 3 місяці тому +1

      House appliances.

  • @mortenjrgensen5497
    @mortenjrgensen5497 3 місяці тому +1

    ❤ good work

  • @davidbrinkman2768
    @davidbrinkman2768 3 місяці тому +1

    It's a shame they cannot come up with "Return to Sender" software.

  • @gont183
    @gont183 3 місяці тому +6

    I am sure it will be studied in depth.

  • @albin2232
    @albin2232 3 місяці тому +7

    Heroyam Slava!

  • @richardkudrna7503
    @richardkudrna7503 3 місяці тому

    Awesome!!
    The cat and mouse game will continue with counter counter measures but I am impressed. These Shahead don’t communicate they fly on their own so to get in there and kill power or such is difficult. For example if it has a little electronic spark ignition device you might fry that with a correct tuned pulse. Or toast the flight controls or even the servo motor. Yes people will scoff at the latter but I believe servos with wire pair can be set up to resonate as common mode and burn the output device. Once you have one in hand you can give it to an EMI team and they can establish multiple modes of attack. It would be a joy to work on that!

  • @franklerouge
    @franklerouge 3 місяці тому +2

    nice back to sender occasion...

  • @kevinp2593
    @kevinp2593 3 місяці тому +3

    Good stuff

  • @ColinJ88
    @ColinJ88 3 місяці тому +3

    I see Shiheds down at work everyday. Most customers are friendly though.

  • @jimmiller5600
    @jimmiller5600 3 місяці тому +32

    The no-snow picture unit may be upside down, obscuring the jet intake?

    • @reubenjackson7829
      @reubenjackson7829 3 місяці тому +11

      More likely the propeller obliterated it's self on crash landing, that's my experience for model aircraft. But still possible it could be the new one

    • @Ganiscol
      @Ganiscol 3 місяці тому +3

      @@reubenjackson7829 not more likely, just another possibility.

    • @dave20thmay
      @dave20thmay 3 місяці тому +1

      That is what I was going to post. Need a photo to see what side the pitot static is. The other in the corn, is with the horizontal two stroke engine. Best Dave

    • @ownpetard8379
      @ownpetard8379 3 місяці тому

      Didn't Such say this in the video?

    • @u2bear377
      @u2bear377 3 місяці тому

      AFAICT from the wing profile, no.

  • @hillwalker8741
    @hillwalker8741 3 місяці тому +2

    I'd bet they can rehab these and return to sender

  • @Marc_Gagne
    @Marc_Gagne 3 місяці тому +20

    Now we'll see how badly sanctions are working.

    • @EricDenton-ky2cb
      @EricDenton-ky2cb 3 місяці тому +3

      Everyone knows there easy to get around

    • @Brian-om2hh
      @Brian-om2hh 3 місяці тому +3

      @@EricDenton-ky2cb Not everyone. I doubt my neighbour would know.

    • @Brian-om2hh
      @Brian-om2hh 3 місяці тому

      Well there are almost 1500 sanctions in place, and Putin wouldn't have demanded they be lifted if they weren't working. Anyway, we'll see how things are in another 2 or 3 years.....

    • @hgv1883
      @hgv1883 3 місяці тому

      The drone comes from Iran are they going to apply sanctions to russia ?????????

  • @BobSmith-dk8nw
    @BobSmith-dk8nw 3 місяці тому

    In WWII the Germans used a Fritz X glide bomb to sink an Italian Battleship - when Italy changed sides. They then used them against the Americans off Anzio - until - the Americans figured out how to jam them.
    This has always been the disadvantage of not having a pilot in the aircraft. It makes it susceptible to EW.
    AI is less susceptible as it can be independent of control - but - then you're got something that is dumb as the box of rocks it is made from controlling the thing.
    .

  • @VictoriaAlfredSmythe
    @VictoriaAlfredSmythe 2 місяці тому +1

    Thank you from Manhattan ©2024

  • @andrewcomments5812
    @andrewcomments5812 3 місяці тому +1

    Great success! 👍👍

  • @I-have-a-brain_and-use-it
    @I-have-a-brain_and-use-it 3 місяці тому +2

    Back in October the Aust government gave Ukraine 20 hand held drone capture weapons .
    However just like the 5 slinger anti drone cannons not a peep from Ukraine to even say they arrived yet alone how they worked on the battleground
    They were quite impressive at the field test days but that is different to real time use

    • @ristoikonen6957
      @ristoikonen6957 3 місяці тому

      Yes, it would be interesting to know, if they did their job or not.

  • @buzzkins2198
    @buzzkins2198 3 місяці тому +2

    That’s how Bob Marley liked his donuts with jam in

  • @shia-rq8fe
    @shia-rq8fe 3 місяці тому +2

    Return to sender

  • @kingqbert6819
    @kingqbert6819 3 місяці тому +3

    It might be that the drone landed upside down and the air Intake is facing the ground rather than the sky.

  • @johnschwartz8015
    @johnschwartz8015 3 місяці тому

    Great picture!
    Bird hunters in the field with big bird they got!!❤😂🎉❤

  • @martinmiessler5025
    @martinmiessler5025 3 місяці тому +13

    😊 Fette Beute !
    🇺🇦🇺🇲🇬🇧🇪🇺🇺🇦

  • @stevo091
    @stevo091 3 місяці тому +7

    Nice one 🇬🇧💪
    Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦🇬🇧💪🙏

  • @charlesmarkley220
    @charlesmarkley220 3 місяці тому +2

    Every time you say Shahed, I crack up knowing the very soft T in traditional English.

  • @outtakontroll3334
    @outtakontroll3334 3 місяці тому +1

    signficant development if it holds and they have enough capacity

  • @Ever443
    @Ever443 3 місяці тому +4

    This can’t be, the Iranians said they’re not sending drones to Russia. (Insert sarcasm)😂😂😂

  • @wildonemeister
    @wildonemeister 3 місяці тому +1

    For all we know the air intake could be towards the ground in the images.

  • @sesameseedbar8853
    @sesameseedbar8853 2 місяці тому

    Not gonna lie, that thing looks way bigger than I ever thought it was.
    I honestly thought it was not much bigger than the size of a biggish bird.

  • @Nick-pq4ri
    @Nick-pq4ri 3 місяці тому +10

    The UK supplied Ukraine with some new tech 🇺🇦🇬🇧✌️

  • @josephmerritt1411
    @josephmerritt1411 3 місяці тому +3

    1:36 what if the drone is upside down? Is the air intake for the turbine engine simply hidden from view?

  • @blitzroehre1807
    @blitzroehre1807 3 місяці тому +1

    ...and I bet those boffins are chuffed as hell they can dismantle some intact ones now to glean some important infos...

  • @hardtackbeans9790
    @hardtackbeans9790 3 місяці тому +1

    The propeller will many times break away when it hits the ground. The next one has the propeller still intact because it didn't hit the ground that way.

  • @philandrawis6232
    @philandrawis6232 3 місяці тому

    they can be reverse-engineered fast and manufactured to give the rookies the same medicine they were getting from them but in huge numbers, you can see from the size of the front of these drones that they are big and can really have a deadly punch I know there was a 25 Killo warhead that can do a lot of damage

  • @TeddyR_Official
    @TeddyR_Official 3 місяці тому +1

    One of the reasons the Allies won WWII, is that they were tight lipped about the capture of an enigma machine. They make sure the Germans won’t find out, so they can keep using it.

    • @BR-hi6yt
      @BR-hi6yt 3 місяці тому

      In WW2 they put out the story that eating carrots gave pilots very good vision, whist keeping the true reason secret - it was radar.

  • @chrisb7198
    @chrisb7198 3 місяці тому

    Getting some of these in tact so they can be examined will no doubt help them figure out how better to stop them. Plus they can study them and build their own versions.

  • @stephenpounds8360
    @stephenpounds8360 3 місяці тому +2

    Slava Ukraine

  • @lowandslow3939
    @lowandslow3939 3 місяці тому

    I’m relieved to see the donut shop is open!

  • @Gasher82nd
    @Gasher82nd 3 місяці тому +1

    You need to watch british forces updates and shorts on UK testing new anti drone weapons in Ukraine. You will find the reason 30 plus drones were bought down without even firing a shot this week.

  • @yymmyyyymmyy2630
    @yymmyyyymmyy2630 3 місяці тому

    The one not in snowy ground is 136 according by pitot tube on the middle of the wing.

  • @tohariparjoko6869
    @tohariparjoko6869 3 місяці тому

    War is a place where real products meet their real buyers.

  • @maestromecanico597
    @maestromecanico597 3 місяці тому

    It gets me, and is telling of the times we’re in, that downed ordnance in Eastern Europe is germane to a conflict in the Southern Red Sea.

  • @mickleblade
    @mickleblade 3 місяці тому

    The importance of being able to string down the shaved and understeer is vulnerabilities cannot be understated.

  • @bertloreto9507
    @bertloreto9507 3 місяці тому +6

    The size of the jaming device is not related to the size of the target. Electronics and radio waves just do what they do.
    An intact recovery means that the exact operational digital codes and frequency can now be worked out dialled into the jammers, AND with more jamming energy to keep these things falling off the sky.
    I’d love to see a jammer someday completely hack the targeting system of the drone and have it fly back to the launcher, wouldn’t that be a feat!!? 😂

  • @neilfoster9517
    @neilfoster9517 3 місяці тому +2

    The jammers will only get better after the autopsy’s are completed

  • @JuanSanchez-ik7wx
    @JuanSanchez-ik7wx 3 місяці тому

    f I owned a TV tower in Ukraine, I would be investing in cope cages. Im sure there is a DF app out there that could be useful for locking onto TV towers. TV towers could use Ultrasonic meters, that are currently used to measure power line heights, to spot incoming drones and fire protective devices when a solid object penetrates a certain distance. And optical distance measuring devices could also be used with the same protective devices. War brings innovations doesn't it?

  • @foamer443
    @foamer443 3 місяці тому

    Query. At least in a few of the stills, close to the rear trailing edge on the top of the drone there are what look to be (for lack of a better term) a series of "grab irons". Any idea what these are really?

  • @QueueWithACapitalQ
    @QueueWithACapitalQ 3 місяці тому

    0:30 I think they are separate drones. I could be wrong but i think the hills in the background look different, and the ground in the second pic is more at an angle like its more on the side of the hill they are on rather than more on top like in the first.

  • @alabamacajun7791
    @alabamacajun7791 3 місяці тому

    This is bawls!

  • @brankoerculj876
    @brankoerculj876 3 місяці тому

    Seems very solid manufacture, as the drone didn't disintegrate while falling down.

  • @RubenNielpha
    @RubenNielpha 3 місяці тому

    Sinister machines, specially knowing the origin.

  • @WhyWhatWhoWhenWhyAgain
    @WhyWhatWhoWhenWhyAgain 3 місяці тому +1

    Oooooo! Great job guys!!

  • @johnbooth3073
    @johnbooth3073 3 місяці тому

    The EW was recently donated by the UK I think because Rishi said he was going to send some EW capability to Ukraine.

  • @mskiptr
    @mskiptr 3 місяці тому +1

    If these drones are listening to any radio communications when in the air, it could be possible to now find exploits in their software stack and take over them mid-flight lol

  • @thomassecurename3152
    @thomassecurename3152 3 місяці тому +1

    Good video release Suchomimus. Tom.

  • @DanFrederiksen
    @DanFrederiksen 2 місяці тому

    the forward drum is the war head? is it just a bomb style or a shaped charge?
    if you know how to electronically fool them it doesn't take a big device.

  • @stringsofconsciousness4202
    @stringsofconsciousness4202 3 місяці тому +4

    Holy cow these things are massive, I am just wondering what even is the advantage of the jet turbine variant since it definietly has lower efficiency and therefore smaller range compared to the prop version

    • @death_parade
      @death_parade 3 місяці тому

      Speed. No? And at higher altitude, it can cruise more efficiently with the jet.

    • @stringsofconsciousness4202
      @stringsofconsciousness4202 3 місяці тому

      ​@@death_parade Yeah, but don't they usually cruise at pretty low altitudes?

    • @neolord50pro77
      @neolord50pro77 3 місяці тому

      I guess it's faster and it's harder to shoot down. Also easier to be mistaken for missile.

  • @okolona1
    @okolona1 2 місяці тому

    Working near those Russian warheads must have been scary

  • @signorpippistrello
    @signorpippistrello 2 місяці тому

    The blades break in belly landings, even if the prop‘s only windmilling.