The Recording King vs. Martin Question!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 497

  • @johnathanutahzio8474
    @johnathanutahzio8474 4 роки тому +50

    This guy is a treasure to the guitar community. Best sub I e made in the last ten years.

    • @MisterNiles
      @MisterNiles 3 роки тому +4

      I just subscribed, and I am feeling the same thing. He's also a person who knows the beauty of Yamaha. It's lonely out here these days. I've not had the pleasure of playing the fine, handmade Yamaha's that he has, but my FG from the 90s is wonderful. I walked into a vintage guitar store in DC with 3k in my pocket but only spent $350 and walked away with "my" guitar. It wonderful. I'm at the point where I believe my playing justifies a bit of an upgrade though, and I also want a nice pickup system. So I'm going to try and get an FGX5.
      Hopefully JP and I will get to be good friends and he'll mail me L models to borrow for a few months at a time :) Seriously though, I really am glad I found him. America is indeed depressing these days, and lately I've lost interest in the things I really love. JP is making me feel that excitement again. That's a great gift.

    • @fredboesing7907
      @fredboesing7907 Рік тому

      I coutour

  • @brunoottens3445
    @brunoottens3445 4 роки тому +33

    I would love to see a comparison between de Alvarez and Recording King!!!

  • @phlipbs
    @phlipbs 3 роки тому +14

    The first sounds new and focused (the Recording King); the second sounds more aged (the Martin). They both sound great in your hands, JP!

  • @luisg.martinezmarti7838
    @luisg.martinezmarti7838 4 роки тому +12

    Just FYI, you mention at the 10:55 mark that the Alvarez you reviewed in the Nov. 2, 2019 video comparison to the Martin has laminate B/S. That is not correct. The Alvarez MD60EBG is an all solid guitar (which you mentioned in that video). The Alvarez is all solid just like this Record King (although sitka/mahogany instead of adirondack/rosewood). It also retails for less than the RD-328. Also, I do not think Robin Boucher invented torrefaction unless he's a viking. The process is attributed to Vikings who used torrefied wood to build their ships to keep moisture out, and make them lighter and faster. The Finnish luthier Juha Ruokangas was the first to use the process to make guitars, he made his electric guitars with torrefied wood in the 90's.

  • @toneseeker4968
    @toneseeker4968 Рік тому +3

    I just recently discovered you and your channel, J.P., and I am binging your videos. I have been playing for 40 years...nowhere as good as you, but to my audience, friends, and family...they are amazed. I just want to say I love you, Brother! You speak my language; and we're definitely kindred spirits. Long live your channel! Btw, representing Houston, Tx...

  • @tylerhenderson4244
    @tylerhenderson4244 2 роки тому +12

    The Alvarez you used in the last test does have solid back and sides. It’s part of their Master Works series which are all solid.

  • @Southernguitar74
    @Southernguitar74 4 роки тому +49

    There is a definite difference in these 2 guitars. The first was much brighter, and the second much warmer and full. I say #1 is Recording King, and #2 is Martin...Either way, #2 sounded quite a bit better to my ears, for what it's worth. Neither sounded bad, but #2 was the winner, and I'm guessing it's the Martin. I hope I'm wrong! Lol

    • @lilycat1694
      @lilycat1694 4 роки тому +1

      I displease the crown I agree.

    • @johntarman3234
      @johntarman3234 4 роки тому +5

      I actually liked the brighter almost brassy tone of the Recording King, though it would mello over time.

    • @jazzlehazzle
      @jazzlehazzle 3 роки тому +1

      Mainly bc the RK is a brand-new guitar, and "quite a bit" is a strong term to me, especially not "quite a bit" = "5000 by-god dollars."

    • @gammaraygem
      @gammaraygem 2 роки тому +2

      I think you are right, but I would choose the nr 1. I like the bright trebles, though they may mellow over time,as a commenter said. I own a Eastman E20D TC, chinese handbuilt all solid D28 copy. Awesome guitar. 2000 bucks though...
      Thing is, uless you actually can compare them on site (in shop) it is hard to know. I tried a range of Eastmans from 600 Euro upwards and they all sounded very good, but you could still hear why the expensive ones were...more expensive.
      I just found this channel and subbed.

    • @Southernguitar74
      @Southernguitar74 2 роки тому

      @@jazzlehazzle quite a bit may sound strong to your ears, but to my ears there was no comparison. The Martin blew the RK away, and I posted this comment the same day this was uploaded, before the answer was revealed. Listening again much later, I agree with and stand by my statement, and then some. I don’t care for the RK at all. Funny, I hardly remember this comparison. That’s how much of an impression the RK made. LOL

  • @russellhowemusic2578
    @russellhowemusic2578 4 роки тому +20

    2nd sounds like a martin. Tighter, and less ringing. First sounds new, bright and clear. I'm unbiased. Love my Yamaha LL16. $900

  • @sununtaschnittker6469
    @sununtaschnittker6469 Рік тому +1

    You are fun to watch and I always learn stuff, highest compliment I can make!

  • @Tizz_Eye
    @Tizz_Eye Рік тому +3

    I just bought a blueridge ❤️. The first new guitar I have bought. I always bought used and slightly increased the quality over the last 4 years since I started. I could have brought a martin. But I couldn't justify the price compared to the blueridge. I looooveee guitar and I love you too bud. Thanks. I'm so glad I stumbled across this.

  • @D60Larrivee
    @D60Larrivee 4 роки тому +9

    I'm going with guitar number 2. It sounded a little "bassier" to me and not as much sustain in treble range. Can't wait to hear the results.

  • @LesGuitaresBoucher
    @LesGuitaresBoucher 4 роки тому +3

    Great video JP! It will be interesting to see everyone’s answers. We will
    watch your next video for the answer! Thank you!

    • @warnerconstruction4806
      @warnerconstruction4806 3 місяці тому

      Would love to hear your take on the inspired by gibson humming bird

  • @lilycat1694
    @lilycat1694 4 роки тому +8

    #2 was my choice, and I think it is the Martin! I would be very surprised if # 2 is the Recording King.

  • @Sherpa38
    @Sherpa38 2 роки тому +1

    Hi JP,
    if one day you can have both in your hands, is it possible to compare the RK RD316 with a D18?
    I have the recording king nRD-316 for 5 years, I find it superb, but I have not, and I may never have, the opportunity to test a Martin, and since they have the same specs, I would be happy to hear the difference (in brand and price!) Thanks to you!

  • @scottsozmtns7534
    @scottsozmtns7534 Рік тому +1

    I bought a Bourgeois Vintage D several yrs back w/serial #-under 3,000. Love it! Traded my Beard Resonator (Dobro), which became the Jerry Douglas model for it straight across, & glad I did! I’ve tried to teach my oldest son how to play & wanted to get him a quality box at a fair price. I chose Recording King after reading the woods, bracing & tone then sought to get my boy one. His was mahogany sides & back and the sound blew me away! I then bought one for myself that had rosewood sides & back w/Adirondack spruce top & when I get a guitar out to jam or show my son a lick or 2, I reach for my Recording King & leave my Bourgeois in the case so it’s only played when w/serious players & keeps it unblemished and it’s value intact. I love my Recording King guitar & I’ve been playing since age 9, so it’s been 40-years and I’ve played a few boxes in my time. Great video!

  • @janfrombelgium5410
    @janfrombelgium5410 Рік тому +1

    Where is the answer? Or when is it going to come 🤷🏻‍♂️
    I absolutely preferred the first one, it judt had much more in it. It just made me smile...
    The second one sounded more compressed.
    So, I think nr 2 was the Martin 👀

  • @begraz
    @begraz 4 роки тому +7

    I say #1 was the Recording King, it was definitely a brighter tone [which I prefer]. In fact IMHO I have NEVER owned a Martin, because I've always felt they were/are too mellow/warm... and acoustic guitar has always struggled to get in the mix, and again in my opinion that is part of the reason. A brighter guitar not only has more presence, but cuts thru better too.

  • @raymondbruce7175
    @raymondbruce7175 2 роки тому +4

    I don't know if Canada considers this man a national treasure but Scotland loves him. (Especially Shetland )

  • @DarrenForbes
    @DarrenForbes 4 роки тому +5

    I like the sound of #2. Can’t wait to see which one I actually like.

  • @Jeffrey.T
    @Jeffrey.T Рік тому +1

    I found your channel a few weeks ago, while researching my next guitar purchase. After viewing your previous comparison video, I found an Alvarez MD60EBG (I need the electronics) at my local dealer. After playing it, I brought it home. I’d still love to get a Martin D-18 or a D-28. I’d be real curious about putting the Alvarez and the Recording King up against a new Martin. The Aged, played in sound was obvious in this video for those who know what to listen for, but I have to say, that Recording King sure held its own and 1/4 the price. I own a 1970’s Sigma DR-7, made by Martin in Japan. I can’t tell it apart from a D-28 based on sound alone. Those are another bang for your buck purchase if you find them.

  • @callehellstrom
    @callehellstrom 2 роки тому +1

    Great video JP!
    I curious... if you would pick between the Yamaha FG3 and the RD 328 Recording King.. which would you choose? They are in the same price range and are both high praised by you.
    Maybe a comparison video like this one?

  • @hobbyjohnny
    @hobbyjohnny 4 роки тому +1

    I am going to say #1 was Martin. So glad I discovered your channel. You have been a breath of fresh air during the lockdown. Hope you can get back on the road soon, but that would mean we won't get the enjoy your talent on YT.

  • @stomique
    @stomique 4 роки тому +6

    I like the second one. I really hope it is the Recording King. I work with M. George here in Fredericton and we are talking with Guillaume about representing them.

    • @JPCormier
      @JPCormier  4 роки тому +2

      Troy McLaggan you cant go wrong with recording king. They’re incredible instruments for the money.

    • @ColinFowlie
      @ColinFowlie 4 роки тому +2

      If you do, I'll definitely refer any of my guitar-shopping friends your way to check them out.

  • @johntarman3234
    @johntarman3234 4 роки тому +12

    I would guess guitar 2 was the Martin just sounded a little more aged.

  • @sunnyray7819
    @sunnyray7819 Рік тому +1

    I can tell what one sounds new but to be honest, once that RD-328 opens up and dries out a little, it might be be harder to hear the difference. I have had many cheap acoustics go through my hands and I can tell the difference in a solid guitar. But even a decent cheap solid top can be a great guitar. I have a Blueridge BR60, Solid Sitka with Laminate Rosewood, and it's a rhythm monster. Loud. And at the Bluegrass jam I had several people ask what it was and liked the sound. I say partially some of that is experience but also definitely the guitar. But the neck is screwed up and I adjusted it several times. It got worse to where I had to actually make the strings higher. Over several months it just got worse. Not my first time adjusting guitars either. I decided to put it in slack key tuning (open G) and it relaxed the neck a little more. But that was my Bluegrass jam guitar. I have been without a good jam guitar for a while now. I have a decent Yamaha solid top but it's not something I think can hang with the Banjo and Mandolin. I finally got the money together to order Recording King RD-328. I can't wait. Hopefully it's similar to my Blueridge but a little better. I don't think it could possibly be louder to be honest but if it's the same, I will be thrilled. I do play on the point of as hard as I can usually so I can't say for sure but I think the Blueridge was louder than all the Martins. I was louder anyways. I had to kinda ease back sometimes. But this should be a great guitar. 11 days till arrival..

  • @jamesconley9376
    @jamesconley9376 4 роки тому +1

    I have a 2016 Recording King ROS-10/000 12 fret, with elixir lite strings. Sweet little guitar, solid top/ back/side-built well, perfect intonation and resonance. Great for finger picking my favorite songwriter's music (John Prine).

  • @davidlawrence327
    @davidlawrence327 4 роки тому +4

    For another REMARKABLE "bang for the buck" comparison, I'd love to see you A/B the RD-T16, with the torrified Addy top, with your Martin. I got mine used for $325.00- even more amazing, when you consider the massive difference in price.

  • @kaput450
    @kaput450 2 роки тому +1

    i think #1 is the RK it just sounds bright and new. I know this is old but am anxious to see the answer. I have 2 RK banjos and they are excellent instruments. I like #2 better.

  • @Bigoak66
    @Bigoak66 4 роки тому +2

    I would assume the 2nd is the Martin and would be happy to know that it is the Recording King. Great video.

  • @richadams7121
    @richadams7121 3 роки тому +1

    From one OLD martin player to another, one who is still picking on Martin, I'd have to say the second piece was played on the Clearance White model Martin because of the warmth of the mid -range and the sustained tone. The Recording King is super clear on the top like a Rosewood guitar box should sound! Sounds REALL good!

  • @joedown962
    @joedown962 Рік тому

    JP, I often heard and read that this is Dana Bourgeois who has been the first to torrefy his guitar tops. What are you thoughts about it? Thanks.

  • @woodysworldofwonders7709
    @woodysworldofwonders7709 2 роки тому

    Which guitar was which? I’ve never owned, or played a Martin, (my acoustics- Gibson J45 mahogany M, Ibanez Ew60 coco bolo & an Antoria J100 copy), so I’ve no idea what the Martin would sound like, but my favourite was number 2. Saying that both sounded good, but No2 just sounded better to me.

  • @raymondperrault5821
    @raymondperrault5821 4 роки тому +1

    Hey JP do you have anything to say about Stonebridge/Furch guitars?

  • @HayesTech
    @HayesTech Рік тому

    Lol... Last comment, I promise. I wanted to mention that the Pickguard started coming off of mine and I ended up taking it off completely. But after a year and a half, nothing broke or cracked and it's sounding great.
    I can highly recommend them.

  • @glennthomson1828
    @glennthomson1828 3 роки тому

    JP. I am really interested what you think of Art Lutherie Ami and /or compared to a Recording King parlour, I am considering one or the other as a beginner. Thanks ahead of time

  • @agoogleuser7832
    @agoogleuser7832 3 роки тому +3

    It's almost obvious that #2 is the Martin and #1 is the Recording King. The wood on #2 sounds warmer and a little punchier but the ringing bell like tone on #1 sounds exactly what I'm looking for while I own other darker sounding guitars. Both guitars sound great!

  • @chrispark716
    @chrispark716 4 роки тому +1

    I would guess #1 was Martin.
    By the way, I just ordered Recording King RD-126 prior to watching this video. I’m glad you had good things to say about this brand.
    Always enjoy your videos. Thanks!

  • @patrickwillshire6388
    @patrickwillshire6388 2 роки тому +1

    I’m leaning towards the Martin being the 2nd one, only because of the bigger bottom end, however, that said, I prefer the first because I love the trebles and the clarity stands out for me. Great show, John, from Down Under.

  • @reginaldbarnes632
    @reginaldbarnes632 2 роки тому

    when do we get the answer? They're both nice, but the second one had a warmth and depth of tone which I prefered.

  • @stikkgreen5237
    @stikkgreen5237 4 роки тому +2

    I'd be delightfully shocked if the RK was the second one. Hey, J.P., ...crazy timing. I have been looking for the right one of these all week. Any thoughts on sanding off the thick coating on the Adi top?

  • @treverjones2921
    @treverjones2921 4 роки тому

    Without looking at comments, I chose #1 as the Martin. Good comparison. Thank you and enjoy your channel.

  • @ovash1
    @ovash1 Рік тому

    I think this video is more difficult than the Alvarez comparison video. On that video I thought the second guitar was clearer than the first. On this video I like the second guitar but not by much. They are almost identical. I don't know Martin guitars, only played one in my life, I can only say what sounds better to me.
    Great video, I love this channel and really love the way you think, God bless.

  • @bradchalmers4894
    @bradchalmers4894 4 роки тому +1

    I think #2 was the Martin. It has a warmer sound. But, they are very close and I think it just goes to show that it has more to do with the player and less to do with the instrument. Ultimately the player has to be happy with the sound of their instrument so it inspires them to pick it up often. I enjoy all your all your videos, especially in these crazy times. Looking forward to live entertainment again!

  • @tjdonaldson6923
    @tjdonaldson6923 3 роки тому

    Im so glad i found JP and this channel. Jp has a great personality and some videos are so funny.
    I love you too JP. Thanks man 👍

  • @billdedrick1914
    @billdedrick1914 Рік тому

    JP what is the best Bluegrass sounding Mahogany dred from Recording King?

  • @Randysax1955
    @Randysax1955 2 роки тому

    J.P......I just saw this for the 1st time. I'm now chasing a Recording King to "back up" my Martin J40. Did you receive the Recording King via the post,..or were you able to get one that was sold and set up locally ? Just curious- Thanks ! Randy

  • @davidharrick469
    @davidharrick469 4 роки тому +4

    My vote is the Martin is the second guitar. The second guitar had a more fuller sound to the lower register notes. Both sounded good, but I prefer guitar 2

  • @michaelcox960
    @michaelcox960 Рік тому +1

    I felt that the first was the RK and the latter was the Martin. Unlike many commenting here, I felt the difference between the two quite discernible (however this is NOT to say that I am CERTAIN which is which - but only that they were quite different 'in my ear').

  • @draganklj
    @draganklj 2 роки тому

    Number one TRK, number two M. Thank you for honest and authentic advice. I trust you. All the best

  • @BF...
    @BF... 4 роки тому

    Hi J.P. I'm curious if you've ever played a Northwood guitar? They are made by a luthier luthier in B.C. that learned the trade years ago from Jean Larrivee. I own one and the clarity and sustain are insane. I considered Boucher, and still would like to get one of their guitars one day as well.

  • @Rustymcdangles
    @Rustymcdangles 3 роки тому

    Thanks for this video. I can’t wait to order this guitar, I’m beyond excited

  • @HayesTech
    @HayesTech Рік тому

    I also wanted to mention that the Alvarez MD60BG that you made a video on, is made from solid East Indian Rosewood back and sides and a solid sickness spruce top. You got it right in your initial video. I know because I actually contacted Alvarez and talk to them. I was getting ready to make a video and I had a few questions that I wanted answered, so I could be correct in all my statements.
    1. Top it's solid AAAA Sitka spruce.
    2. Back and sides are solid East Indian Rosewood.
    3. Neck is mahogany
    4. Neck to body joint is compound dovetail.
    5. Glue used throughout is white wood glue. The newer models have switched to a more eco friendly white wood glue though.
    6. Bone nut and saddle
    7. Either rosewood or Indian Laurel is used for the fretboard and bridge depending on when it was made.
    I hope this helps someone looking to purchase an Alvarez. My favorite is the Recording King but I live my Alvarez too.

    • @ralfybaby
      @ralfybaby Рік тому +1

      The 60 is a hog The 70 is the rosewood one

    • @HayesTech
      @HayesTech Рік тому +1

      @@ralfybaby
      Yes, you are correct. I miss spoke. But I wanted to bring to light that the Alvarez MD series are made from all solid wood. There is no plywood in those guitars. And yes, the 60 series, like what I have, is African Mahogany and the 70 series is East Indian Rosewood.

    • @ralfybaby
      @ralfybaby Рік тому +1

      @@HayesTech well you were more correct than John 😁

  • @eddieman42
    @eddieman42 4 роки тому

    Yes, exactly.. Build them like they used to.. Great video jp. Will check it the recording king guitars for sure. The 18 model... Thanks buddy, great show

  • @hr2186
    @hr2186 2 роки тому

    The recording king v neck on the ro-318....i have small hands...is it clucky like they used to be? ive had 2 older ones and they were enormous. thinking eastman if so. wish companies would go back to 1 11/16

  • @richardabbuhl
    @richardabbuhl 2 роки тому

    The first was the Recording King RD 328. It was brighter and harsher. The second was the Martin D-28. It was softer, warmer, and the notes were clearer.

  • @kenwalker2868
    @kenwalker2868 3 роки тому +1

    I think #2 was the Martin. Both sounded great and beautifully played.

  • @HayesTech
    @HayesTech 3 роки тому

    Just to let you know, I purchased this guitar after watching your videos and haven't looked back. I love my RD-328. Thank you for introducing me to this great brand.
    I wanted to do a video showing that some cheaper priced guitars could sound as good as the name Brand guitars and this one definitely does that.
    Thank you again for opening my eyes to Recording King.

  • @zHumanfactor
    @zHumanfactor 4 роки тому +2

    I think #1 sounds more powerful (perhaps slightly more noise/overtones, than #2) , #2 was more controlled or focused from note to note. I think #1 would be a better fit for someone performing where a strong voice is needed (street, outdoors, etc) , while #2 might be better in the recording studio or stage and play better with other instruments. Having said that, I preferred the #1 guitar overall.

  • @ClaytonWillisMusic
    @ClaytonWillisMusic Рік тому

    You mentioned the Alvarez MD60BG was laminate back and sides. But I was under the understanding it was solid Mahogany back and sides. Just as the MD70BG is solid Rosewood? Could someone confirm?

  • @philbustard
    @philbustard 4 роки тому +2

    I thought #2 had more of the Martin sound, but it was a hard decision. The 1st guitar sounded like the action was a bit to low and the frets were choking some of the tone.

  • @breakandrun70
    @breakandrun70 2 роки тому +1

    Hi J. P; I think #2 was the Martin. To tell the truth they were really hard to tell. The first guitar sounded
    a little tinny to my ear. Will be interesting to see what the results are. Thanks for the great video.

  • @tubadylan
    @tubadylan 3 роки тому +1

    I honestly had trouble hearing the difference, but if I had to choose I think I like number one best. However, I think if I listened again I might change my mind. So close!

  • @BoatersMarineSpply
    @BoatersMarineSpply 4 роки тому +1

    This is fun! I own and play 3 Martins (D45, DRS2, and HD28E). Number 2 sounds like the Martin to me (Warm rich lows, great mids, and rich highs). I'd bet on this! Although I have lost a few bets on the KY Derby here in Louisville KY - Cheers

  • @eds.8458
    @eds.8458 4 роки тому +1

    #2, Martin? Thanks Sir, you are a master no question. Both sound fantastic to me, in your hands.

  • @tobystevens9183
    @tobystevens9183 3 роки тому +1

    #1 is brighter. #2 has a warm sound. Both sound great!

  • @jasonuzzardo6508
    @jasonuzzardo6508 3 роки тому

    You mentioned in your video that you used a tortex 1.46 pick to brighten up these guitars. Do you have a link? I have struggled to find them and really want to brighten up the RD-328

  • @skaybaltimore
    @skaybaltimore 3 роки тому +1

    I'm going to say that guitar #2 was the R.K. RD-328, mainly because I heard a slightly annoying metallic edge/"buzz" to some of the notes that I didn't hear on guitar #1. We'll see.

  • @Southernguitar74
    @Southernguitar74 4 роки тому +1

    Oh, and I own the Alvarez md60ebg because of you and I am certain they are all solid woods. Solid spruce top, solid mahogany back and sides. No laminates on these babies! Incredible value...And I am close to buying a Boucher BG-52, or perhaps another Gibson. I have always preferred them over Martin. Sorry, fan boys. Lol

  • @rickved
    @rickved Рік тому

    I listened with Beyerdynamic Amiron headphones. Number 2 seemed.a little brighter, but I can't say which I prefer.

  • @RadioTime.
    @RadioTime. 4 роки тому +1

    I think that #1 was the Martin and #2 was the Recording King. The first guitar I thought had a bit of a twang going on. I preferred the second guitar personally, seemed to have more overtones happening with a higher high-end, a lower low-end and an overall fuller and balanced sound. Both great sounding guitars.

  • @TaiChiBeMe
    @TaiChiBeMe 2 роки тому

    I tried a Parlor Recording King at Guitar Center and it was not good. I did like the Taylor GS Mini there and bought that. I also did buy an Alvarez MD60BG (dreadnought) and it is a very good guitar. It was $100 less than the Taylor GS Mini, but I had to pay someone $100 to set it up properly. Couldn't bar the first fret when I got it, but now it plays and sounds great.

  • @vincentlussier8264
    @vincentlussier8264 2 роки тому

    I can clearly hear a difference. The first was brighter sounding and the second was a little deeper and darker sounding. But which is which, you've got me! On a dice rolling guess, I think the second was the Martin.

  • @donyoung7874
    @donyoung7874 2 роки тому

    I just came across Boucher guitars and your videos. I've spent hours watching them since. Your playing is awesome and those guitars sound phenomenal! I have coveted a Collings for years but now I want to sell some things to buy a Boucher. That Recording King is amazing for what appears to be $500. It does have a worn in sound.

  • @nathananderson1605
    @nathananderson1605 Рік тому

    Have you ever played a blueridge? If so are they as good as the recording king?

  • @USNAVDC
    @USNAVDC 3 роки тому

    The Recording King looks beautiful. I love torrified guitars! One of my guitars is a 1963 D-28 that my dad bought new...
    it's a beauty.

  • @robertjohnson1681
    @robertjohnson1681 4 роки тому +2

    Not sure which Alvarez you're referring to, but the MD60BG is solid African Mahogany back and sides. Sitka top.

  • @jasonuzzardo6508
    @jasonuzzardo6508 3 роки тому

    OMG - What is the answer!?!?!?!?!?! they both sounded amazing. I just ordered the recording king rd-328. cannot beat the price and quality!

    • @kyleharleyanderton
      @kyleharleyanderton 3 роки тому +1

      The RD-328 was first.
      I love mine, it needed a good setup, and I also put bone pins. It's a beast

  • @kendallhadden
    @kendallhadden 4 роки тому +1

    The Alvarez MD60BG is solid wood which is what I thought you compared in the prior comparison video.

  • @williamknell864
    @williamknell864 3 роки тому

    Wow. Very tough.
    I'm thinking 2 is the Martin. There a rounder, woodier thing to the attack.
    1 sounded "stringier" or slightly brighter. On that final chord, the decay mellows down, so they sound damn identical.
    Ridiculously close, over all, and they both sound great.
    Wild.
    Now I'll check out the answer video, well after the fact.

  • @redfox8626
    @redfox8626 4 роки тому +1

    Great test JP.. I don't know which is martin but i know that i like the 2nd guitar slightly more than the 1st.

  • @stevelacombe5291
    @stevelacombe5291 3 роки тому

    What are the top bracing specs and fingerboard with on the Martin v the Recording King?
    Also watch J.P.’s video that explains why Martins and other imported guitars cost so much because of the taxes involved.

  • @l.a.cantinabandofficial1541
    @l.a.cantinabandofficial1541 3 роки тому

    J.P the last time you did a video like this you convinced me to get a Alvarez Md60bg. Sad story the Alvarez got cracked and didn’t make it. After that I was gifted a Martin D 16. Now I’m watching this, I’m only a minute and a half in and I know I’m gonna end up on reverb tonight looking at Recording King RD 328 and RO 328s trying to pick one out to buy😂 lol

  • @josephsantana3094
    @josephsantana3094 4 роки тому

    Id like to see an Eastman vs Martin video. Or if not a full test like this maybe just a short video about your thoughts on Eastman guitars and where you think they stand against the Martins and Taylors and boutique brands.

  • @johnbaker4666
    @johnbaker4666 4 роки тому

    I got the last one right and I think #2 is the Martin. I'm not a Martin nut but I think that higher end guitars are more likely to sound more balanced in general and more consistent recorded. #1 had something going on in the midrange that was tweaking on my ear a bit. It might have just been the way it was responding to the mic though.
    If number #2 is the Recording King then wow. I have to get me one. They both do sound great either way.

  • @philippm6804
    @philippm6804 6 місяців тому

    Great video! What's the name of that tune?

  • @agoogleuser7832
    @agoogleuser7832 3 роки тому +1

    JP? What do you think of Blueridge? BTW LOVE your videos and your playing even more!

    • @kyleharleyanderton
      @kyleharleyanderton 3 роки тому +1

      Blueridge guitars are great. but recording king is building the same thing cheaper. I own an rd-328 and with a good setup and some bone pins the thing is amazing.

  • @1armedguy4
    @1armedguy4 4 роки тому

    JP what's your take on Wayne Henderson line of stringed instruments but mostly his guitars ? Thanks !🇨🇦

  • @RLabbe508
    @RLabbe508 3 роки тому

    Great video JP, based largely on your opinion of the RD 328,mine should arrive in a couple of days!

  • @dewoner4
    @dewoner4 3 роки тому

    I like the more mellow voice/tone of guitar #2. Guitar #1 sounded a bit thin / harsh . Curious to find out which is which.

  • @ronaldoesterling8270
    @ronaldoesterling8270 3 роки тому

    Yours is the first UA-cam channel, to which I have subscribed, but I find your playing both enjoyable and informative. Is there any chance of you reviewing an Orangewood Echo. Even better, compare it to a Yamaha FG830.
    ,

  • @digitalsketchguy
    @digitalsketchguy 4 роки тому +1

    Hi J.P. I'm really getting into bluegrass & looking for a guitar around £500-£600. Have a Yamaha FG730S & looking to sell & get something closer to those beautiful tones i hear from Martin, Recording King, Red Label Yamaha. HELP!

    • @OLDROCKER123
      @OLDROCKER123 3 роки тому

      Hello,
      I gather your from the UK. Recording Kings are fabulous but difficult to find here.
      Definitely recommend.
      Good luck.

  • @terminalergeistesklarer1182
    @terminalergeistesklarer1182 3 роки тому +1

    22:07 Guitar1
    23:06 Guitar2
    For me is the aged well ballanced sample 2 the Martin.
    But i will buy the Recording King + new wooden pins + new strings + L.R. Baggs M80! 😛

  • @3cardmonty602
    @3cardmonty602 4 роки тому

    JP - Have you ever owned a Seagull Guitar? Yes - I agree that inexpensive guitars do “move” more than Martin’s or Gibson’s. #2 is the Martin. Gibson is making some great acoustics now, but the price is steep. But, I traded in 2 Martin’s for 2 Gibson’s over the last year, and the sonic quality is so much greater and equalized on my Gibson’s - J45 & an AG Parlor Rosewood, and I bought them slightly used and was able to get them for under $1000 each.

  • @752brickie
    @752brickie 4 роки тому

    I played a Recording King RD 126 " I think that was the model" at a music store in State College ,PA probably 6-8 years ago and it was AMAZING !! I have a Taylor,4-Martins and an Alvarez and I will tell you the Alvarez is an amazing guitar !
    Love your Playing you take a backseat to no one my friend ! I would guess the Martin is the second one ? But I do not have any Dreads only OM,and 000's !

  • @drothberg3
    @drothberg3 2 роки тому

    I had a Recording King RD-316 that I just sold. It had great specs, including an Adirondack Spruce top and solid mahogany back and sides. It took me 3 tries from Recording King to get one that had the bridge placed properly so that it could have acceptable intonation. I finally did. I then played it like crazy for 3-4 years trying to get it to open up. It sounded decent but not great, kind of a tight sound, not as open, loud or musical as a Martin D18. I don't know how yours is, but mine was a far cry from a Martin D18.

    • @Sherpa38
      @Sherpa38 2 роки тому

      Hi, I have an RD316, I'm super happy with it, but I dream of testing a D18!!

  • @abztractboxingandstuff8384
    @abztractboxingandstuff8384 2 роки тому

    Hey JP I recently came across your channel and I’m loving your content. On the subject of affordable alternatives to your martins and Gibson’s, have you played a furch? Made in the Czech Republic and they are simply brilliant. Astoundingly good and priced between 5 or 6 hundred and a couple of grand for the high end models and they blow similarly priced big name guitars clean out of the water.

  • @stuartneill2454
    @stuartneill2454 4 роки тому +1

    I believe #1 was the Martin. Both guitars sound very nice.

  • @jbanjo056
    @jbanjo056 2 роки тому

    This was awesome sir, very helpful

  • @azibolino
    @azibolino 3 роки тому

    I also think the 2. is the Martin. But the RK sounds very good! One of my guitars is a RK Ros 06, a 000-12Fret. And i love it.

  • @addisonlockeentertainment7339
    @addisonlockeentertainment7339 4 роки тому +2

    Martin was number 1 . #2 was softer . I think that the sharper sound of #1 might be a result of the less finish and larger hole. There you go my thoughts.