How a Giant Pendulum Made Taipei101 Possible!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 лют 2022
- This video explains the clever design solution that engineers employ in the design of high-rise buildings. Usually, high-rise structures resist lateral loads via steel frames, shear cores, or braced steel beams. Sometimes, these systems are not enough and engineers have to resort to other options. The video starts with a generic description of the forces experienced by a skyscraper with the main focus cast on wind loads. Furthermore, the video discusses the aerodynamic features of a building and tricks that reduce the applied wind loads. Lastly, the video explains the use of a tuned mass damper that damps out particular frequencies of the building resulting in a decreased sway of the building.
References:
[1] ACI SP-97, "Analysis and Design of High-Rise Concrete Buildings," USA, 1989.
[2] D. Bennett, Skyscrapers: Form & Function, New York: Simon & Schuster Ltd., 1995.
[3] M. H. Günel and H. E. Ilgin, Tall Buildings Structural Systems and Aerodynamic Form, New York: Taylor & Francis Group, 2014.
[4] H. T. Breukelman, J. Robinson and J. Kottelenberg, "Tuned mass dampers under excessive structural excitation," Motioneer-ing Inc., Guelph, Ontario, 2003.
[5] N. Eddy, "Popular Mechanics," 19 July 2005. [Online]. Available: www.popularmechanics.com/tech.... [Accessed February 2022]. - Наука та технологія
I’m a union Carpenter and have worked on many high rise buildings and I’m fascinated by the tuned mass damper, and would have really enjoyed being at the top when the earthquake happened. The video was easy to understand and the illustrations were helpful to visualize the engineering principles involved. I’m looking forward to seeing more of the videos you produce. Thank you !
My name is Bicycle Bob and I approved this message and I'm a 30 year retired Teamster.
I also approve this message.
Fuck unions
F u c k unions
Im here because I saw a video of the damper in action a few weeks ago (Taiwan earthquake). And when I saw it I immediately thought how heavy it must be and how they got it up there. But in my amateur mind I imagined that it is a hollow ball which then they filled up with lead or something similar. Really fascinating.stuff.
That's actually clever. Pouring molten would be an efficient way of shifting the mass
It looks like it’s made of slices of steel, I think they probably craned each slice up, and stacked them on top of each other then made the bolted connections in situ.
I am here because of the Taiwan earthquake and because I played a video game called Mirrors Edge Catalyst and in a mission one fell and tore through a building!
Im a retired carpenter and this content was very easily understandable for me. Ive always loved science but i get lost if videos are orientated towards high level academics like videos of conferences on very specific science topics. Your videos could be twice as long and complicated and id still be able to follow.
That being said, great video you earn my sub and full bell notifications :)
Hi John, thank you so much for the great feedback. It makes us really happy to hear that our content is easy to follow and to understand for people of all backgrounds. We aim at explaining engineering concepts with mostly intuitive and intrinsic knowledge through simple illustrations rather than complex equations, though we do end up putting an equation or two on the screen occasionally.
Very interesting indeed !
Thanks a lot. I can appreciate the technical challenges presented to the structural designers.
I have no idea how to thank you guys...this explanation is just a gem for civil/structural engineers.❤
Thanks Fahim, comments like this mean the world 🙏
Your simplified explanation is on point, keep it up.😊
Great video! The whole world using your content to get new knowledge.
Excellent, concise and clear video. I look forward to exploring more of your videos.
Awesome, thank you very much Jose!
Such a great video David!
Thanks Lindsay✌🏻😊
Great explanations! Thank you. Technical enough to be not simplistic or dumbed down. Good graphic to accompany the technical part. Two thumbs up!
Glad you enjoyed it!
High quality video. Thanks a lot bro 🙏🏿
Excellent video, completely understandable and thoroughly fascinating.
As an engineering student i definitely find this channel more than interesting. Thanks for the content!!
Glad you enjoy it!
I live where ground-level straight-line wind speeds well in excess of 100 KPH are common and we never have rail cars of any kind blow over.
Exactly. In my country,in the coastal regions we have 100km/h wind gusts. And we also don't have train carts flipping over.
I wanted to know and this video was simple enough and technical enough for me to grasp and understand. I also appreciate your ending comments regarding other factors/forces that must be considered. I am not a science/engineer minded person but have a great respect and interest. This video allows me to learn AND understand enough!!
I love reading comments like this; it's so rewarding! Thank you for stopping by and also for taking the time to write this. Cheers!
Very interesting and well done!
Wonderfully explained, easy to understand. Thanks so much for this information.
Thank you Mary for tuning in 🙏. Regards!
Great video! Well explained.
I appreciate your efforts ,brief and concise video .Thankyou for sharing , Tall structures are more vulnerable to wind loads because the frequency of wind loads and tall structures is lower there is high probability of frequencies' matching and resonance will occur if frequencies are matched and as a result violet shaking of the building will occur .
Thanks for sharing. I am not connected with engineering but found this most interesting 😊.
Great video, educational, fun, and understandable. Thanks, I've subscribed 😀
Fine explanation. Thanks
Great video! Simple and objective, thank you
Good introduction.
Now I'd like to see a level 2 of this material, focusing on earthquakes.
There is a video of the Taipai Tower during the latest earthquake.
I sort of "get" how the damper works, but I want to see it second-by-second, with a contrast of what would happen if the damper weren't there.
Good video, thanks, very understandable
Good video, thanks.
Well done, that was relatively easy for this non tech guy to understand
thank you, I am glad 🙏
Every time I visit Taipei, I revisit Taipei 101--just to gaze at the pendulum.
All of it. I live in Vancouver BC - we have a building here that has a center core and the "building is hanging from that internal tower by cables and rubber" it works.
Great video, btw don't shy away from things getting too complicated.
Thanks, will keep that in mind!
Outstanding!
great video 👍
Great video... your presentation of complex concepts were delivered in everyday terminology. There was enough information detail to keep engineering geeks like me attentive. I can recall several structures classes in college. We discussed building sway and it's effects on buildings. The primary concern is structural, building has to stand, not collapse. The second concern is motion that might cause a building occupant to literally get sea sick.
I have been in a number of high rises. On several occasions wind did make building sway. The motion was very slow and barely noticeable to the average person. I knew it was swaying because I sighted edge of window frame on a distant object. It appeared as if the distant object was moving, but the object I stood in (high rise) was actually moving.
The poor guys who really have it bad on a windy day are the window washers. I think I'll pass. I'm not afraid of falling from extreme heights, I'm afraid of extreme stopping when I hit the ground.
I’ve just discovered your excellent channel and subscribed immediately. The people who will be interested in watching your explanations will also have some grasp of at least basic physics and math so I 8:23 think you could easily delve into a bit of this. You could even have a few lectures covering basic concepts of structural engineering and materials. I’d love to see them. A good educator does not talk down to the level of his audience, he or she stretches their understanding up. It’s called learning.
Thanks for the feedback, duderino. I hope you didn't feel that I talked down to the audience. I just wanted to ensure that everyone is still on board and get a feel for what the audience appreciates and wants more of. Cheers!
Well done.
All of it, it's full of useful information, thank you ✌🏻✌🏻
Thanks Ali, we are glad you enjoyed it! Makes it worth the time!
amazing innovation🙌
My kids & I just watched! We learned a lot. Probably 30% was too difficult, but I am ok with that as I mostly focus on History so my science knowledge needs work! We subscribed!
Also, I was up in Tapei 101 in the fall of 2004 and got to see the ball....so cool.
That's great! Thanks for taking the time to write this feedback. I really enjoy when viewers express their opinions. The mass-tuned damper concept is extremely interesting and has many applications. If your kids found it cool; it may be good to consider a career in engineering ☺ When I was a teenager I was always fascinated by technologies like this. It led me to the engineering field. Never regretted that decision. Cheers and thanks for the subscription!
very well done!
Amazing sir
Very interesting.
Very nice
thanks
Im a non engineer interested in engineering and this video was the perfect mix of details and not details. I loved when you said that xyz are simplifications - it sparked more curiousity while making me able to understand instead of getting bogged down in details - BUT, and this is critical, I also didn’t have to get stuck on not understanding how or why that thing is
Thank you so much Alice, comments like this is what gives us the motivation to produce more content. We are so happy you liked our video. Regards!
Thank you
You're welcome
nice one
Amazing video, what software you are using (at 7:17) to model the structures with and without tune mass damper. I should try modeling myself and see. Thank you bro
Thanks Chanmakara, the software is called Algodoo and is free. It is a good physics engine for modeling all sorts of physics. See link: www.algoryx.se/algodoo/#:~:text=Algodoo%20is%20FREE%20for%20Windows,scenes%20that%20have%20been%20shared.
Appreciate it.
I understand!
It was easy to understand. Mechanics is simple. Cross wind displacements and torsional displacements should be added, as the other stuff about resonance, height, stiffness etc is well known and self evident.
I invented a new structural innovation to my self build house with a 2 metre cantilever: prestressed steel springs that ingeniously pivots the entire weight of the overhang section back to the centre of the structure as an equal and opposite moment. This prevents strain deformation of the timbers over time, as the springs react with the same force as the weight of the over hang. The half ton over hang is thus supported by embodied field repulsion in the bent springs.
Good video, clear, concise…engineers should govern nations instead of criminals.
Thank you sir! You are absolutely right, vortex-induced-vibration and torsional loads are often much more difficult to deal with but less known to the average viewer. Also your beam element sounds very interesting! Cheers and thanks for stopping by!
@@TheEngineeringHub maybe…perhaps you could include some fluid dynamics, periodic vortical regimes, chaotic regimes v wind velocity, resulting asymmetric pressure differentials leading to twisting forces on steel frames opposed for example by our good friend the triangle brace.
5:20 Eiffel Tower: 😎
Go into all the details please
wait what? I'm watching a video with less than 10k views? Excellent excellent job. Please make it more technical, I'm assuming people are more curious to know more!
I'm confused with this mass damper thing for a long time since I was a child because I thought it will only transfer the kinetic energy to the "mass damper" and still, what's the point? they will reach an equibillibrium then the overall energy of the sway is still the same. Thanks for reminding me what the "damper" means lol. Apparently, it dissipates heat, which makes absolute sense. Gonna binge watch your videos bro. Sorry for bad English.
Thank you so much Omni, we are so glad you found the video interesting. We will keep doing what we are doing and hopefully more people will start enjoying our channel in the future.
I speak only English and your is better than anything else could I could speak.
@@brucelomax3375 I've just learned 80% watching youtube and reading comments and also commenting. Thanks man.
@@TheEngineeringHub awesome!! this gets us closer to the answer i asked in other vid. Thank you
Please make video on power spectrum of wind
Hi neelam, thanks for the comment, noted!
Surely swaying of tall buildings will cause damage to the fabric of the building, especially cumulative damage over time? For example, stress cracks, metal fatigue, and the like? I'm assuming that routine checks will monitor for this?
Q: A question is "weighing" on my mind! ... What happens to the people and floors underneath the 730 ton Taipei ball, should it fall? ... Nothing good, I'll wager? ... The engineers will be in "bits?" They'll be "crushed?"
I think it is not only the wind pushing, it is also the sucking on the other side!
I can see how a counterweight like that could help during an earthquake, but what happens when the wind blows in one direction for a sustained period of time? The building should start swaying but then stay into that position, the weight of a sphere like that would be moved in a not advantageous position within seconds. The way I understand this is that it can only help with sudden movements, not with sustained leaning into any direction. Did I miss something?
Yes, there is something to that. What the video doesn't mention is that the MTD only damps out the worst frequencies (resonance) but it slightly worsen the frequencies around it. See this plot for example: www.spiedigitallibrary.org/ContentImages/Proceedings/10166/101660C/FigureImages/00022_PSISDG10166_101660C_page_5_1.jpg
To your point about winds sustained for long periods, this case is not too critical as it will be very far from the resonance range so the MTD won't really be activated, the structure can handle that alone. The MTD is only activated when the blowing of the wind is synchronized with the swaying of the building (i.e. resonance) that is where the danger lies.
A video showing the Taipei 101 damper swaying during an earthquake:
ua-cam.com/video/Tkz6b7Q3dRk/v-deo.html
As a baker when I watch engineering videos it makes me wish I stayed in school.
What software is shown @7:17?
It's a free physics engine called Algodoo.
www.algodoo.com/
@@TheEngineeringHub Very Cool! What a great learning tool! And is that device at the bottom reading groundmovements or inducing them?
Yes absolutely, it's a very interesting tool to play with! That device at the bottom is recording/monitoring the oscillations at the top of the model. The induced displacement here is from a wind force distributed along the building's height.
5:00 weght lol
👍👍
I am here because of the Taiwan earthquake and because I played a video game called Mirrors Edge Catalyst and in a mission one fell and tore through a building!
WOW I NEVER NOTICED TAIWAN NOW HAS 3D I WAS WAITING FOR SO MANY YEARS FOR TAIPER 101 TO GET A 3D IN GOOGLE EARTH
hah! we are glad that is available for you now
@@TheEngineeringHub yeah I never noticed that Taipei has a 3D I was waiting for so many years
It can fall down
limit, hmm, this is only for concrete buildings, because they are weak and brittle, while metal is flexible, and now you can build a twelve-kilometer tall skyscraper vertically, :)
Hi Rafal, for sure steel is more ductile than concrete but when it comes to flexibility of skyscrapers the height is by far the most important parameter. It appears cubed in the formula so it affects the behavior in a nonlinear manner. The flexibility of tall structures is great for earthquakes but does not do well with typhoons. The resonance frequency of the wind gusts is low enough (high period of vibration) to match the vibrations of a skyscraper and then problems occur. Anything above 500m tall requires a careful aerodynamic analysis.
@@TheEngineeringHub Hello - according to my calculations, the height of a steel or metal skyscraper must be proportional horizontally to ensure its stability, it is not profitable to build skyscrapers on a small area and spend enormous money on the quality of materials, the currently known method of building skyscrapers on a small area is not profitable because such structures are just covered by the height limit, one particular skyscraper will be enough than ten small ones, and this action reduces the cost of maintaining the building
@@TheEngineeringHub hello - I designed my skyscraper which at the base, one of the sides of the wall, is 1000 m, and is 4000 m high, the top roof is 70 m, looks almost like a pyramid, and is stable, it is only a design, real, to be done, the cost of construction exceeds the cost of high-rise buildings at present
Having bought an engineered building and seeing it fail during an ice storm, I have zero confidence in Engineers. You would not catch me in a structure that involved the "engineering" principles of late.
You don’t need to “dumb it down” this much.
Most of the video was understandable. But, I had trouble with the names of the places. Consider adding a few subtitles.
savants
.
..
What I find difficult to understand is, that someone with a decent enough command of English to narrate a video could be oblivious to the pronunciation of the "ch" sound in words like technology or technical. How could you go through life, learning all the engineering jargon and yet look past something as simple as the pronunciation of a pair of letters
I could have definitely done better here. It sounds like this video needed a few more narrations before getting to the final version. But if that's the main mispronunciation that you picked up than I am actually happy. Obviously English is not my first language so I mispronounce words often. Especially when I am focusing on something technical, as if the language part of my brain just turns off so that the mathematical part can get a bit more compute.
Sway too much for me.
Nobody says that the project of the pendulum was made by Ing. Renato Vitaliani of Padua, Italy!