Leak Update 2.37 Thoughts & Clarifications - War Thunder

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 тра 2024
  • Get 3% Off on the War Thunder Store + DECAL :
    bit.ly/3iLtBwh
    Get 3% Off on the Enlisted Store :
    bit.ly/3lqRLhz
    Support my work on Patreon :
    / theeuropeancanadian
    Support my work on SubscribeStar :
    www.subscribestar.com/tec
    Check out the Merch Store :
    www.redbubble.com/people/TEC-...
    I am part of the War Thunder and Enlisted Content Partnership Program :
    warthunder.com/en/media/partne...
    All My Social Media Links :
    linktr.ee/theeuropeancanadian
    We have partnered with Humble Bundle :
    www.humblebundle.com/?partner...
    We have partnered with Fanatical :
    www.fanatical.com/?ref=TheEur...
    We have partnered with Chrono.gg :
    www.chrono.gg/TECHUB
    Send your Replays or Questions here :
    britishcanadianman@gmail.com
    Music used from:
    / teknoaxe
    / channel
    System Specs : Intel Core i7-10700F CPU @ 2.90GHz, 32GB DDR4 @ 3200MHz, EVGA 3070TI FTW3
    Hope you enjoy the video and have an amazing day :)
    #gaming #news #warthunder
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 166

  • @couldnotfindcoolname
    @couldnotfindcoolname Місяць тому +231

    There is no fucking way the f 22 is getting added. We would be getting the yf 23 as a premium first for 150$

    • @Iden_in_the_Rain
      @Iden_in_the_Rain Місяць тому +36

      They’d also add the Su-57 at the same time and make it ten times better because Gaijin

    • @vgames1543
      @vgames1543 Місяць тому +15

      I would buy that YF-23, such an awesome design.

    • @Juho-uf8si
      @Juho-uf8si Місяць тому +10

      @@Iden_in_the_Rain so make it accurate to IRL? f-22 is pretty mid but overhyped

    • @kerotomas1
      @kerotomas1 Місяць тому +16

      @@Juho-uf8si Accurate? bro, the su-57 is a useless trash. F-22 being mid depends, in a dogfight nothing can really touch it but since the electronics are 20 years old in and the radar too it's not that great for BVR.

    • @overlord4404
      @overlord4404 Місяць тому +16

      @@kerotomas1 Bro how both of you know this? You have access to US and Russian military state secrets?

  • @magical_coww8866
    @magical_coww8866 Місяць тому +154

    Yoo new leak list:
    P51C - Amraam

  • @erikkusters378
    @erikkusters378 Місяць тому +23

    In a real world and cultural sense the Netherlands should go in the german tree.
    As an actual dutch guy i would love to see dutch vehicle's
    But for in game and balane reasons its should go to france they really need something for their tree.
    Or you know.
    Give France the rest of their missing stuff.

    • @anon8206
      @anon8206 Місяць тому

      As an Austrian, I hope all of our vehicles also don't get added to France.

    • @timharnans
      @timharnans Місяць тому

      @@anon8206 There's an Austrian tank in German Tech Tree, so I assume the rest would go there too

    • @anon8206
      @anon8206 Місяць тому

      @@timharnans No the French got the Austrian one, the German tech tree got the Argentinien one, also Sweden gets one of our jets

  • @arem3823
    @arem3823 Місяць тому +31

    Dutch and German army: slowly merging
    Gaijin: The Netherlands goes to France!

    • @7ThePrimagen
      @7ThePrimagen Місяць тому +5

      I mean as a german main
      eh fuck it
      all I want is the He-111 that carried the V-1, if you put that at 4.0 it would not be OP at all, people could complain it is, but they'd be wrong

  • @mando_dablord2646
    @mando_dablord2646 Місяць тому +50

    The problem is France doesn't need a bunch of copy-paste vehicles to fill in the gaps it has. France has French vehicles that can be added, but Gaijin would rather dilute the French tech tree with vehicles that won't add anything special. This is ultimately a problem of their own making.
    This just seems like an argument to try and justify a decision not many people like. The position that BeNeLux will be nothing but a positive for France is a bad one to take.
    Ps: One more thing from another video that I'll reiterate here. BeNeLux being exclusive to France will lock them from being added elsewhere, and the possibility of France getting Spanish or Swiss vehicles that are actually connected to France will also go down drastically.

    • @amendoim_zinho6308
      @amendoim_zinho6308 Місяць тому +6

      Oh my god. I have never realized Be(lgium)Ne(therlands)Lux(embourg) no way

    • @Roguechef220
      @Roguechef220 Місяць тому +1

      Cough FCM F1 Cough

    • @black_thunder2159
      @black_thunder2159 Місяць тому +3

      the issue is that the game tech tree has stopped being "specialized" long time ago, still hoping for "anything special" in a tech tree is literally out of touch, cuz Gaijin has decided to generalize every single tech tree for accessability instead.
      and with this direction, BeNeLux vehicles in French tech tree is indeed very positive.

    • @joshuamueller3206
      @joshuamueller3206 Місяць тому

      Planes France used not in the tree yet,
      Tech Tree: MB.200B.4, MB.210, Amiot 143, Spitfire Mk.V, Hawk 75A-2/A3, MB.151, F4U-7, Vampire FB.5, Mistral, Rafael C/M
      Premium/Squadron: Wibault 7, Hurricane, A-24B, SBC-4, LN.411, Ju 88, F.W. 190A-5/6, AU-1, TBF, Lancaster
      Event/Battle Pass: Gladiator, Blenheim, Wellington, LN.401, F.K.58, Halifax, B-25, Baltimore, Boston III, Ki-43, A6M2-N, He.177A-3, Mosquito, Barracuda Mk.II, Meteor F.4/NF.11, A-26C, Canberra, Sea Venom

    • @mando_dablord2646
      @mando_dablord2646 Місяць тому

      @@black_thunder2159 The problem is that we don't even know what BeNeLux will bring if Gaijin is actually planning anything.
      If it's just a bunch of copy-paste vehicles that take away from what can be added then it's definitely a negative, because it will just bloat the tech tree, likely leaving less room for domestic vehicles.
      The position that we should just support every tech tree being homogenized is stupid at best, because there's no point in playing all the tech trees if everyone has the same things. It's been said that if a certain vehicle is the best and multiple tech trees have it, then you'd see nothing but that one vehicle.
      So two FACTS that show that it's not just a positive, there's many risks that could bring negative consequences.

  • @mr_boo.
    @mr_boo. Місяць тому +7

    The USH with the recoilless rifle isn't Swedish but was used by Belgian mercenaries in the Congo (first the hands now dolls...)

  • @craigwilson9946
    @craigwilson9946 Місяць тому +37

    Gaijin just needs some new game modes and to add the missing cold war aircraft like the su15 Flagon, F101 Voodoo, etc

    • @camronrapp4146
      @camronrapp4146 Місяць тому

      Exactly. Also how tf have we not gotten the su24 yet????

  • @skibscob
    @skibscob Місяць тому +40

    more top tier but cannot fix mid tier smh

    • @PeekCandy
      @PeekCandy Місяць тому +2

      What's wrong with mid-tier? Genuinely asking. Haven't been there in a while.

    • @AmaterasuOjo
      @AmaterasuOjo Місяць тому +13

      ​@@PeekCandyww2 vehicles getting pulverized by modern vehicles.

    • @toasthawaii4
      @toasthawaii4 Місяць тому +2

      Ush and raketenautomat are the biggest problems

    • @enzohumeau8864
      @enzohumeau8864 Місяць тому +3

      @@PeekCandy 70s swedish cancermobiles fighting WW2 era vehicles, forx exemple

    • @aldocarulli3054
      @aldocarulli3054 Місяць тому

      @@AmaterasuOjo oh yeah? Which vehicles are getting pulverized exactly? If you go say shit like Tiger II or MAUS you are fucking delusional

  • @solreaver83
    @solreaver83 Місяць тому +11

    Don't keep repeating the old myth the armour was so bad that's why the battle cruisers died. Nit was ammo storage. The fleet hadn't trained and the guy in charge ordered the ships remove their fire and explosion protection and stored munitions through the corridors to the guns to allow faster reloading. This latent stupidity was the problem for most the bc that detonated. Those that didn't do this had similar armour but survived, some of which were still fighting admirably in ww2.

    • @ICECAPPEDSKY
      @ICECAPPEDSKY Місяць тому

      Yeah battlecruisers really fell out of favor just because battleships have better armament for artillery bombardment (Most battleships success in ww2 was just firing into islands and shore fortifications).
      A lot of later battleships also lowered their raw armor on paper in favor of layers of angled armor as well which was more effective.
      Could newer battlecruisers be built? Yes, but they weren’t so you had vessels that weren’t much faster than older battleships, less armor, less firepower ,and less advanced fire control systems in many cases.

    • @solreaver83
      @solreaver83 Місяць тому +1

      @@ICECAPPEDSKY British battlecruisers had the same guns as their generation of battleship.
      The thing about the Brits and why they had so many is because they were used to replace the heavy cruiser in the fleet. Brits found a battle cruiser could support battleships with speed and fire power while operate to hunt raiders and smaller brouos smaller then battleships with little support. The heavy cruiser just became obsolete to the Brits.
      My guessing is when battleships became reliably as fast as battlecruisers the speed no longer became a needed asset and the lack of heavier cruisers over time to contend with made that role obsolete with the newer generations of light cruisers with their considerable capabilities.

  • @TikerFighter
    @TikerFighter Місяць тому +20

    germany doesn't need Netherlands for ground but they do for air. Not much to add before the eurofighter

    • @TikerFighter
      @TikerFighter Місяць тому +10

      its also a dumb lazy move to add more leopards to other nations

    • @Favorye
      @Favorye Місяць тому +1

      they will have swiss f-18 and problaly some polish or austrian plane too so it will be fine for them

    • @venatrix3431
      @venatrix3431 Місяць тому +1

      @@TikerFighter I hate it. I mainly play France, and we have a million things we need more than some overrated german armor box. They're just avoiding the UAE Leclerc, SXXI AZUR, Leclerc T4, etc.
      And of course, they won't just buff the Leclercs to make them good. They ignore the facts to make them worse than they should be
      France doesn't need a subtree, it needs the VEXTRA 120, the EBRC, Panhard Sphynx, not the most overrated MBT in service

    • @Bf109F-4lover
      @Bf109F-4lover Місяць тому

      I still want that Romanian aviation sub tech tree

    • @thunderball1398
      @thunderball1398 Місяць тому

      ​@@Favoryeor Argentinien stuff what would also bring juniq stuff

  • @donovanchau3483
    @donovanchau3483 Місяць тому +5

    I mean having a bunch of aircraft with similar characteristics at around the same BR wouldn’t be terrible nor do I hate the continuous iteration of the M60 even within the same nation. If I die, I just come back in practically the same vehicle without having to spend a backup. The issue is the grind. It takes so damn long just to get something you pretty much already have. Also I’m hoping we get the F-117 at some point if they ever consider adding stealth as a mechanic. It’s slow, unmaneuverable and only theoretically gets AIM-9s if any air to air weapons and I believe only one of them ever got a radar installed. It would be a very soft introduction to stealth rather than adding something insane like the F-22 or YF-23.

    • @russianreaper7716
      @russianreaper7716 Місяць тому

      No f-117 is ever documented as having any air to air capability. Only has any record of carrying 2 count them 2 bombs

    • @gojithecringe
      @gojithecringe Місяць тому

      ​@@russianreaper7716Some F-117 pilots said that they tried hunting enemy aircraft in either Iraq or Yugoslavia with AIM-9s on improvised pylons, but there is not enough evidence

  • @lfraser7128
    @lfraser7128 Місяць тому +5

    God I hope it’s not that fucking 20mm thing. We don’t need any more fucking, modern shit mixed in with the WWII br’s

    • @airsoftpopcorn
      @airsoftpopcorn Місяць тому +1

      The ush? It only has a 20mm from ww2, i don’t see the problem with it

  • @TheKythia
    @TheKythia Місяць тому +4

    Hey ... sometimes a tanker gets lonely ... :/

  • @frankbradley4487
    @frankbradley4487 Місяць тому +9

    I sure hope and think that the French CBT is for their coastal forces!! Fingers crossed 🤞🏼

    • @2goober4u
      @2goober4u Місяць тому +7

      No, "French CBT" is the term for how it feels to grind the french tree

    • @Camster509
      @Camster509 Місяць тому +2

      i love CBT!

    • @RedXlV
      @RedXlV Місяць тому +1

      Yep, and while France has fewer coastal boats than some nations, they've got some interesting ones. Including the hilarity of a barge with a literal Sherman tank permanently mounted to it.

    • @frankbradley4487
      @frankbradley4487 Місяць тому +2

      @@RedXlV Yeah, the L-990. Extremely based but I fear that it will be the French low BR CBT premium.

  • @kineuhansen8629
    @kineuhansen8629 Місяць тому

    if i remember right the battlecruiser hms queen mary was the pride of the royal navy during her time and it would be great to see her in war thunder

  • @RedXlV
    @RedXlV Місяць тому +1

    With HMS Queen Mary coming, we need SMS Seydlitz, a unique German battlecruiser and the ship that sank Queen Mary.
    As for a BeNeLux subtree for France, I don't really have a problem with it, but honestly I think it's not strictly necessary. Belgium alone would actually do a lot to bolster France. But Dutch stuff will help too, so why not.

  • @oz314
    @oz314 Місяць тому +1

    Still waiting on cold war heavies like the t58 t57 and object 277

  • @therealavenger3537
    @therealavenger3537 Місяць тому +1

    Yes. Bring on the ocean liners to naval!

  • @Jadefox32
    @Jadefox32 Місяць тому

    I want the WW1 configuration for I think it was Olympic or Britanic.

  • @noahhuls
    @noahhuls Місяць тому +17

    adding the netherlands to france is a damn warcrime

    • @torpy9212
      @torpy9212 Місяць тому +2

      Same with IN to GB

    • @airsoftpopcorn
      @airsoftpopcorn Місяць тому

      @@torpy9212why?

    • @torpy9212
      @torpy9212 Місяць тому

      @@airsoftpopcorn Why should India be in GB man, just remove South Afrika and India from GB tree and make its own damn tree

    • @airsoftpopcorn
      @airsoftpopcorn Місяць тому +3

      @@torpy9212 because neither both were part of the british empire until pretty recently, plus, they don’t have enough unique vehicles.

    • @torpy9212
      @torpy9212 Місяць тому

      @@airsoftpopcorn If the leaks are to be trusted , they will have R77 and Jas39's Fox 3 in one single tree

  • @captainvimes365
    @captainvimes365 Місяць тому

    I don't know if you've done a video already, but I'd love to see your thoughts on the commonwealth vehicles and why quite a number of them go into the American tech tree. You mentioned several points of view generally go into the thought process of where these type of vehicles should go, but from a political/historical side they're part of the UK Commonwealth and from the side of 'Does this nation really need this?' although the UK tree is certainly a good tree which would you consider is better from an overall look at the tree: UK or USA?
    P.S. Sorry if this is a little rough, I just had breakfast so have yet to find all my faculties lol

  • @City-hellcat-monkey-theft
    @City-hellcat-monkey-theft Місяць тому +2

    Dawg can we not get the stingray light tank added😭😭😭

  • @Knot_Sean
    @Knot_Sean Місяць тому

    7:30 I continuously die to Russian motor and gun boats, I don’t get it at all to sometimes when especially a 138.2mm shell doesn’t hull-break a torpedo boat but an American 5” almost always does the job hmmn :/

  • @Youllpayforthat
    @Youllpayforthat Місяць тому +1

    We need so many more Cold War era vehicles first AND mainly the first stealth aircraft added has to be the F117… like come on don’t just jump the gun on modern

  • @GamingIsForKids
    @GamingIsForKids Місяць тому

    link to the leak list?

  • @Warbeaver
    @Warbeaver Місяць тому +7

    I want the T-64BV Ukrainian 2017 update version and T-84 Oplot.

  • @joshuamueller3206
    @joshuamueller3206 Місяць тому +1

    Please, only be Belgium. Belgium actually used French aircraft and would have 1 domesticly produced low-tier plane. Belgium also has French cultural influences, unlike the Netherlands who are closer to German and predominantly use American aircraft.

  • @Endoloris99
    @Endoloris99 Місяць тому +2

    I agree, I'm sorry if it hurt big 3 players but you guys have already everything it's not because you guys are the most nation played in the game that mean you're the only one who should get everything

  • @justinwilliams2000
    @justinwilliams2000 Місяць тому

    What happens on patrols stays on patrols.

  • @imstillwaitingtyphoontobeadded

    i'm still waiting typhoon to get added to wt.....

  • @HDOuss
    @HDOuss Місяць тому +1

    Netherlands needs to be on german tree

  • @GamingIsForKids
    @GamingIsForKids Місяць тому

    they have different names... one is HMS and the other is RMS

  • @robertshaw5296
    @robertshaw5296 Місяць тому +1

    Its a old time store manakin not a blow up doll.

  • @504smudge
    @504smudge Місяць тому

    Would anyone play coastal if it was added to France? Costal just doesn’t seem to have a place at the moment, other than being food for DDs.. it would be nice if they’d re balance costal, like making them stealthy l, so they aren’t auto detected by DDs unless they are very close. Or have to be manually targeted.. I’ve had a load of whale man achievements to get recently, it’s so bloody annoying when you come around an island to ambush a DD and its secondaries light you up immediately..

    • @thisherehandleIdospout
      @thisherehandleIdospout Місяць тому

      The key is to uptier the fast bois with good torpedoes all the way to top-tier (or very near) to sneak around to the enemy spawn and sink oblivious, camping capital ships - Gotten quite a few good kills doing that ;)

  • @Bandit0313
    @Bandit0313 Місяць тому

    I saw the F-22 as the thumbnail and I immediately had to click.

  • @tothedome566
    @tothedome566 Місяць тому

    It's not an issue of "they are only working on one or the other" its that at the end of the day updates dont have a huge amount of content. What they do have is spread throughout 8 nations and 3 gamemodes. Sure the french stuff will come in, but when? I think people are more pissed about an update focused on copypaste rather than focusing on unique stuff

  • @brettpowers14
    @brettpowers14 Місяць тому

    I just want SEAD missles since they have added the s1 cas has been bs. Shot out of spawn.

  • @02suraditpengsaeng41
    @02suraditpengsaeng41 Місяць тому

    3:25 real, we want weaponized ocean liners/merchant ships
    for look you know 69% and I don't play naval XD

  • @BillKillerz
    @BillKillerz Місяць тому +3

    Bruh gtfo with those F-22 in the thumbnail XD
    Also GTFO Gaijin with your Desert of Ahrakis event ads 2 years after the freaking event XD

  • @user-iu4jl6cg4n
    @user-iu4jl6cg4n Місяць тому +2

    Boring update,nobody didn't even leak classified military documents.

    • @thisherehandleIdospout
      @thisherehandleIdospout Місяць тому

      True, not a real update unless someone goes to prison - Them's is just facts.

  • @gustavofelix3433
    @gustavofelix3433 Місяць тому

    Bro why the given BENELUX for france...will add a subtree without much future perspective with different things.
    It's really worth having a sub tree that ends at f16 block 10 so that later in the distant future you can have f35.
    Why don't they put an Egyptian or Algerian subtree.
    There are many more different vehicles to add in the short and medium term than an F16A and an F35.
    if they want to expand some nations with subtree that are nations that have a direct relationship with countries, Belgium in this case has, but part of Belgium is part of the Germanic community as well.
    the concept of subtree needs to change a little, instead of being a subtree from a specific country it should be from specific communities.
    countries that have historical, linguistic, cultural relations and mainly arms purchase relations linked to the main nation.
    in a way, gaijin got the community concept right but the execution isn't very good, the fifth line of tectree should be a line of related countries where they would add different vehicles for these nations that have a certain "lack of vehicles", to fill gaps without being tied to a specific country.
    for example, with this 5 flexible tree, you could add the swiss f18 for Germany, Italy and France.
    Could add Polish f16s for Germany, Danish f16s for Sweden.
    Could add mig 29 north koreans for the chinese, better versions of the f15 koreans for the japanese.
    A sub tree should be that, it should be a flex line to fill in gaps in these civs without being linked to a specific "subnation"

  • @vanjat2850
    @vanjat2850 Місяць тому

    I personally do not give a crap where they will be, all i want are dutch ships, if they do come, I'll definitely main them instead of italy.

  • @aljamoz1591
    @aljamoz1591 Місяць тому +1

    Haw abut yugoslavia?

  • @user-cx5jk3jh9t
    @user-cx5jk3jh9t Місяць тому +1

    Yee...
    France get a new update after 1 year again...
    And japan is without update since 2016...
    8 FCKING YEARS

    • @razvy6949
      @razvy6949 Місяць тому

      As a Japan main, I'm lucky the few things Japan has are strong. I'd be going insane otherwise 😂😂

    • @user-cx5jk3jh9t
      @user-cx5jk3jh9t Місяць тому

      @@razvy6949 true

  • @stone1er371
    @stone1er371 Місяць тому

    Real french mains knew about benelux tt leaks month ago

    • @vincevovk5154
      @vincevovk5154 Місяць тому +3

      As a dutch man who mains france im very happy

    • @arem3823
      @arem3823 Місяць тому +1

      As a Dutch person who mains Germany I’m very upset

    • @vincevovk5154
      @vincevovk5154 Місяць тому

      ⁠@@arem3823begin maar met frankrijk grinden vriend

  • @alexandrebourliaud3271
    @alexandrebourliaud3271 Місяць тому +4

    For belgium, it’s army is under French command in a case of war.

    • @RedXlV
      @RedXlV Місяць тому +1

      But conversely, doesn't the Netherlands have similar military integration with Germany? Including the only remaining Dutch tanks being in a joint battalion with the Germany Army.

    • @ratlingzombie8705
      @ratlingzombie8705 Місяць тому

      ​@@RedXlV correct

  • @theincrediblefox
    @theincrediblefox Місяць тому

    I mean by the logic of simply looking at what tech tree is in need of what vehicles, you might as well give Israel an Iran subtree. I challange you to make that proposal and see how well it goes over.

  • @SolidariusLive
    @SolidariusLive Місяць тому

    French CBT. Surcouf and subs ❤❤❤

  • @dbrk9991
    @dbrk9991 Місяць тому

    About adding BeNeLux to the french tech tree, it would be a good idea especially sonce the Mirage 2000 doesn't seems to be that good, it would rebalance the french TT until they add the Rafale.

  • @makimaki6607
    @makimaki6607 Місяць тому

    why arent they going to germany. of course lets give them even more than they already have

  • @wowdanalise
    @wowdanalise Місяць тому +4

    As a player who does not play ground above 7.0, not air above 9.3
    Wow, another patch that effects me in literally no way at all.
    Maybe in one of these patches I'll get something, anything.

  • @jesusofbullets
    @jesusofbullets Місяць тому +1

    Oh finally, I can leak the F-22 docs

  • @BigBinks
    @BigBinks Місяць тому +3

    8seconds ago and no views. wow.

  • @Bf109F-4lover
    @Bf109F-4lover Місяць тому

    I still want that Romanian aviation tech tree, no one else thinks it should be added? Really? And those won't be completely copy planes.

    • @victortruong6789
      @victortruong6789 Місяць тому

      Too bad, Hungarian planes are being added to Italy instead. Don't know about France, but it seems BeNeLux is more likely to come to France than Romania.

    • @Bf109F-4lover
      @Bf109F-4lover Місяць тому

      @@victortruong6789 It will... But why not add Romania as a tech tree?

  • @Marcel0FF
    @Marcel0FF Місяць тому

    Belgium tree for france would be perfect, because of the f35 they than can get

  • @darkmavrik2490
    @darkmavrik2490 Місяць тому +1

    so that means the f22 is confirmed for the next update

  • @solreaver83
    @solreaver83 Місяць тому +3

    Hungary ground has done almost nothing for Italy. They either add to lineups they already had or are all by themselves at a br no Italian vehicles support so don't get played or are dragged up.

    • @kerotomas1
      @kerotomas1 Місяць тому +2

      There is the Leo 2A7 HU in the near future. Could be even next patch as it's not that much different than the 2A7V Germany currently has.

    • @solreaver83
      @solreaver83 Місяць тому

      @@kerotomas1 but a whole line for 1 or 2 vehicles does not fix a tree. Hungary didn't fill any gaps and the br adjustments due to performance made the little they did to help even more useless. Don't get me wrong some of them are nice vehicles but they just don't have lineups so fixed nothing.

    • @toasthawaii4
      @toasthawaii4 Місяць тому +1

      There are some good hungarian Originals that could come,but gaijin gave it copy and paste

    • @victortruong6789
      @victortruong6789 Місяць тому +1

      Not Hungary's fault that Gaijin chose to model only like 10% of their vehicles and call it a day. Hungary would have been much more useful if Gaijin actually tried to model a good amount of Hungarian vehicles.

    • @solreaver83
      @solreaver83 Місяць тому

      @@victortruong6789 I never said it was I merely commented that what has been added fixed nothing, which is contrary to EC, something he's repeated multiple times. Maybe it could have been better but it wasn't and your response agrees with that.

  • @chrishandy1538
    @chrishandy1538 Місяць тому

    Hey can’t get annoyed at us Brits of using the same name on our ships when the US have done the same example the US have used the USS enterprise name on eight different ships 🤣🤣🤣

  • @noerden91
    @noerden91 Місяць тому

    but if relationships dosent matter between countires why havent they added south korea too japan xD instead of thailand seems as south korea has alot of stuff 8.0 and higher too bolster japan

  • @Mr.DalekLK
    @Mr.DalekLK Місяць тому

    Gajin will make all Russian plane better than USA... 100%

  • @adampoultney8737
    @adampoultney8737 Місяць тому

    Nothing above 7.0 interests me… just cash grab and compression. There should be some more attention on expanding the part of the game with more healthy balance, ie the low and mid tiers

  • @danivvarrett3871
    @danivvarrett3871 Місяць тому

    Please dont upload more videos

    • @Nuggies1
      @Nuggies1 29 днів тому

      why not? (just asking)