Ai isn't getting "destroyed" just because real artists still make masterpieces. The fact is, prompt generated art (because it's not an actual artificial intelligence at all) is popular and here to stay, even amongst real artists. Why? Because it's just another great tool that cuts corners, like every good function found in Photoshop or any digital painting program. It saves time and is significantly cheaper. It's efficient. When someone who knows how to digitally paint also masters prompting, they instantly make themselves more desirable for hire than any of the artists in this video.
@@leetlc441 lol i think you are forgetting the fact that the law wont let people copyright ai produced products using ai as a tool however might be posible
@@leetlc441 I've been told this both in art and in my main profession... yet whenever I try to implement them in either, I end up spending as much time correcting the AI problems as I would have making it (or just drawing from the library of work I've already done and tweaking it a bit), or more. I can see using it on a bad day to get around working, but I'm afraid that would get me fired. I'm all for automation, I used to be a dev, but AI tech is pretty much useless for any skilled individual in anything right now. Yeah it might have some narrow use cases, but that little bit of time shaved off on rare occasions isn't really worth wasting your energy with it.
for real and calling ai generated images as art is like saying diamonds are stronger than steel because most people who know nothing about science think hardness is the same as strenght (diamonds are hard and that meanst they dont wear down or scratch, steel is strong but not as hard as diamonds so steel can be scratched by a diamond but not the other way around, which is why diamonds are used for drills)
@@arunmax8319 lol everyone has their strenghts but tbh its so funny seeing ai bros and tech bros defend ai while being wrong (its like, youre smart but also not smart?) gamers are good at gaming real soldiers are good with handling emotions and quick thinking and more ai "artists" are more like engineers, prompt engineers actual artists know the process and what makes what it is, like perspective, colors, lighting and shading, style and are consistent funny tho seeing prompt engineers saying they need to know art just to tell ai better how to generate asthetic images, tbh the ai prob knows more about art than the prompt engineers
My main gripes with ai art is how they steal from actual hardworking and small artist and just trained their AI to mimic them without the hardwork or the emotion that the artist put inside a drawing and get thousands of likes and money.
@@SlothziIt's funny when thinking about ai and why it's not going away, is the people paying the artist to make, don't want people with soul, in the past, and even today, these companies spend months or years beating every last bit soul and hope, to turn bright young creative people, into obedient machines vary much like the things replacing them, al this ai did was cut out the middle man.
@@josephross8753There is no artificial intelligence. That's literally just a buzzword coined for the prompt generating tool to get investors interested. The fact is, this is another tool. Every issue resulting from a generated image can be fixed by a skilled artist. The emotion can still be there with the right user when this tool is used and seen AS a tool and not an "end result". The only reason people say there "can't be emotion" in generated images is because of bias from already KNOWING the image is generated.
My favorite artist is TheCecile. She made me want to draw again, so she has a special place in my heart. A few of my other favorite artists: iromarimorito, zero808w, Shal. E, kuroh.shiro.
My favorite artist is Hanacue. She has a more anime looking style but all of her drawings are so incredibly beautiful and unique! I really admire her artstyle😃
What's sad is that if I'd seen that stuff like 3 years ago I'd be like "Wow, this is really good art." but if I just randomly saw pictures like that today I'd just assume it was probably AI art without looking it at it that closely.
0:54 I’d really love to see more of those “re-drawing Ai images” or perhaps you could try and recreate some of your favourite artists art style! and maybe some helpful tips and strategies on making art lmao
Yeah nah, there are plenty of old masters if you want to study/redraw/remix. There are plenty of dtiys challenges from real artists online. You can even recreate a scene from your fav film or game if that's the kind of (potential) viral convo you're after. Redrawing AI slop just legitimizes and brings attention to it. Engage with other artists and their work, not machines. You will learn more from the craftspeople of your community than pixel predicting robots.
@@meredithweston46399 I really only suggested the Ai one because that’s what got him so much attention in the first place, if you look at his most popular video, the “re-drawing Ai” one, got a million views, I’m really just going off of what the algorithm has pushed out to people.
As a video game art director i created pipeline for my team so that they can create art that is virtually impossible for AI to copy. It is designed around hyper extrapolation and forcing nonsensicalness disorder to take shape into making things sense again. The way these science chefs makes food basically.
Yo I'm a self taught 3d artist myself and would be interested in an anti-ai pipeline for portfolio work, freelance work, etc. I'm aware of stuff like filter programs for stuff like textures/concept art/final renders, but not for anything like 3d models themselves. I'd like to know more!
The cons of the AI 'art' is that it completely lacks any specificity and subtext. There are numerous artists whose works, despite not being conventional, still feel right and deliberate Короче, хлопче, ти молодець, з мене підписка)
I think, it's possible to add specificity and subtext to AI art with recent technologies, but almost no one is doing that, cause it's needed solid prompt and many repetitions
As artists we need to understand words hold power. and we need to remove the word ART from any AI poroduced image. in wikipedia art is defined as: Art is a diverse range of human activity and its resulting product that involves creative or imaginative talent generally expressive of technical proficiency, beauty, emotional power, or conceptual ideas. but it lacks what i think is maybe the most important element of art, especially on the XXI century, art is the product of human experience, is what makes some pieces of musics, visual arts, leterature stand out of lol technical manuals. seriously art moves you, it can make you feel sad or happy. and is something ai images lack the look plastic, serial made, they lack soul, spunk. so they don't deserve to be called art. photoghraphy could be the closes case to what AI is and weell most photographjy is simply not art. and most of what makes it be near art is just the beautyt of nature itself, nature being whatever subject is photographed, i now very few photographers that could be considered artists and they aren't much without their subjects.
I know several artists who have incorporated AI into their pipelines by training the model on their own work, and you wouldn't believe it - their work hasn't lost any of its soul or expressiveness. The problem is not that AI can't show soul or expressiveness. AI itself can't do anything - it's a tool. The problem is that 99% of people who use it do not have the understanding and vision of soul and expressiveness. To get a piece of art, it's not enough to just type in a random promt and get a cool picture. To get something really impressive with AI, you have to know how to do it. At the very least, you should have at least an idea of how to get the same thing without AI, and ideally, you should be an artist. The works of ordinary people with AI are like amateur photos on an iPhone. Yes, something is depicted on them, but its artistic value is about zero. However, if a person who knows what he wants to get, knows how to get it and sees the end result inside himself takes up such an instrument, he will get it even with AI. For exaple this one cdnb.artstation.com/p/assets/images/images/068/116/741/large/ksenia-kiseleva-faavesa-tiefling-party.jpg?1697026110 Or this one cdnb.artstation.com/p/assets/images/images/071/721/143/large/ksenia-kiseleva-faavesa-.jpg?1705793977
@@lognarkiexactly this. When treated as a tool in the process by real artists, image generation programs make everything more efficient. It's a no-brainer. Every one of the great artists in the video likely spent weeks to months on each piece. If they learned how to incorporate the generation programs, they could cut that time in half without losing the final vision and certainly without losing the emotion. I correlate this with motion capture. There are people that record a performance and call it done with no cleanup, because they aren't animators. Then there are animators that take motion capture data and cleans them. The best results are from when the animators utilize motion capture. When randoms do, it looks ugly and jank.
@@OnigoroshiZero thats like saying you shouldnt trust an engineer because most people who dont know anything about engineering think that a car that doesnt crumble is safer than a car that crumbles you should know that art has been around for many MANY years cave art for example, we humans made it and we have a concience emotion and personality is given to a piece of art when someone makes it a piece of code can not draw art it generates images, you just think that image is art because of the cel shading and outlines and stuff you draw art in a flow, not instantly using some words people who use prompts to generate art are the same as people who ask an artist to draw what they want/need
Ai Artists are like well known warriors with no effort nor proof of how they imrpoved, and actually, they just stole the other unknown warriors’ efforts.
These 3 art gods, Guweiz, WLOP and Sam Does Arts are responsible for making me put into practice the dream I've always had since I was a child, painting. Especially Guweiz, he's my favorite artist! I'm happy to discover Wataboku now, as I really like complementary colors. And ai " " " art " " " is just images generated, it's too far from the art concept. Any artist can make an image with greater artistic value, like, being greater than "zero" is easy. Nowadays, some artists implement AI into the process, but in this way it is just a tool like any other and is just part of the process, not the process itself.
Reasons why people hate ai. Job Displacement: Many worry that AI will replace human workers, especially in industries like manufacturing, customer service, and even creative fields, leading to unemployment. Privacy and Security: AI systems can gather and analyze vast amounts of data, raising concerns about personal privacy, data misuse, and surveillance. Bias and Fairness: AI can perpetuate and even amplify biases present in the data it's trained on, leading to unfair or discriminatory outcomes in decision-making processes, such as hiring, law enforcement, or lending. Loss of Human Control: There are fears that advanced AI systems could become uncontrollable or surpass human understanding, leading to unintended consequences. Ethical Concerns: The development of AI technologies, particularly in areas like autonomous weapons or surveillance systems, raises ethical questions about responsibility, consent, and the role of AI in human lives. Creativity and Human Uniqueness: Some people feel threatened by AI's growing role in creative processes, like generating art, music, or writing, believing it diminishes human creativity and uniqueness. Economic Inequality: AI can disproportionately benefit large corporations or certain sectors of society, widening the gap between the rich and the poor
AI customer service is useless. It doesn't tell me anything I can't already find on the website, and I always try to solve my own problems with information available on the website first.
Yes Ai sucks. Saying why would really help. Companies that invested in Ai images and train Ai on art gathered (stolen) from artists on the internet are losing money because Ai images can be very uncontrolable. I've heard professionals in the field say generated images with math as a base will be more accurate.The thing I hate the most is how souless Ai images are. I just want some real information and protection for our work.
Other than some of the ones the video already mentions, some of my favorites that inspire me are Yuumei, Posuka Demizu, Akihiko Yoshida, AsyaYordanova, and so many others. The thing is, at least for me, no matter how advanced AI becomes, nothing will impress and amaze me more than what a human can do. That, and nothing will replace the satisfaction of creating something with your own skill (even if you're a beginner like me). Typing a few words and pressing a button just seems so empty in comparison.
@@AriTu-lv7lz lol its ok i mightve went a bit offensive with the "sooo" part but i get your point, art is art but the thing is that ai gives their creators money while abusing some laws and such, kinda like a monopoly, this reduces traffic from real artists and increases ai slop that was made in a second without any more effort than typing in less than 5 sentences max (i think) ai art is great for personal or research purposes bad for monitization and making a career out of
If you combine those AI with photohop and krita redrawing it is really good though, way better then an ordinary low level artist. Sure it needs 1 or 2 days but better then 1 or 2 weeks. Time is precious so think about it.
I'm a believer that only story teller will survive. But so far, AI is not even AI, it's a huge data base, if an artist has the same amount data in head, the artist is probably gonna do better work. But again, normal people don't give a F if it's good or not, it looks fine then they will buy it, no matter who made it.
Two of my favorite artists are Carles Dalmau (made a lot of the art in the game ‘Cult of the Lamb’ and multiple webcomics) and Bonesaw (also known as Shogunned, who is making a webcomic called, well, Shogunned). They both have very different styles and feelings to them but their works are both so beautiful in their own ways.
i was just thinking about the fact that so much is said here oh my god AI only steals pictures from others (yes ok it's kind of like that) or it is said AI pictures are not art because they come from other artists, but somehow i also have the feeling if someone took a picture from an artist and drew it one to one no one would say the same thing but they would say it's art because a human drew it. (this is just a thought of mine) but i also think that what is meant is that people spam everything with ki pictures. I think if you use this tool (and i don't see it as anything else) in combination with your own drawings etc it would still be ok.
Ok. Those artists are good but their consistent style and subjects make them very good material to train AI and so I think that counteracts the point of the video. 😅 I agree on the storytelling though.
Bill sienkiewicz Barron storrey Dave mckean Feng zhu Brom Chris achiellos John zack Frank Frazetta Boris Vallejo Jose gonzalez Estaban maroto Kim jung gi Bobby chui And many many more. Please find great artists wherever possible
Unless we are lied to about what humanity looks like, there is no AI that has come close to being human. It is it’s own entity, but it is not us and it never will be.
I kind of hate when artist say i dont hate ai art because its replacing me rather i hate because they use my art without my permission. So if assuming its true why do they get angry when people use their image for ai art but dont use them commercially. I mean if the whole purpose is to spread joy then what about those who cant buy this joy. It cost 50 dollar at minimum for digital art more if you are commissioning someone popular. And the basic starting salary in my country is 250$. So its expensive. A kid cant commission u. I understand and believe artist have the right to do whatever they want with their art. They created it. But to say that they want to spread their art among people and be a bich when someone uses their art non commercialy is a scum move. The reason im saying this is because im a student. I dont have time to sit in room for 4 hours and study art and come up with idea. So obviously i used Leonardo to make a lot of reference image in a short time to come up with some ideas because when u dont prompt properly it gives something unique. From those AI ART i got the idea to make a fantasy image with whales as clouds and what it might look like. I completed it and posted on fb with also mentiong that i took help of ai. To my horror not only i was banned but also some furry artist decided to take screenshot post it and humiliate me since i cant "come up with ideas". Yeah so fuk artist. I do art for fun and i will gladly use ai art if it satisfies me. Also what do artist actually mean my creativity when they make the same type of art over and over again with different locations and room design?
No, it just sucks in general too. I quit online gaming because of bots, now the bots are coming to RL too smh. We will never be able to fully trust any content we see again, we won't even be able to trust anyone to be an actual person online or even over the phone apart from actually meeting them. We have entered a new dark age.
Basically AI 'art' is a gacha lmao. AI generated image is same as google image search, type something and voila it's pop some random stuffs close to the prompt.
They want to be in art community so bad and they pass by all the way possible to explain that they do art too and they are the same as digital artist like bro that become embarrassing
What a clickbait, I thought it'd be about artists creating protection trick to avoid getting their drawings become ai base, but these are just... good artists. They have nothing to do with destroying AI.
@@Maikeruartjpyou are basically saying "the pencil sucks compared to the artist". Are you that ignorant of what generative programs actually are? Artificial intelligence isn't actually a thing in these programs. They are literally just tools to be used. Either the user is an artist or they are not. Do you also take issue with the clone tool, magic wand, or any other tool available and regularly used by digital artists? They are effectively the same thing. In the right hands, the tools are wonderful. That's all it comes down to. When a real artist utilizes generation tools, their workflow and efficiency is unmatched and they don't lose their vision.
Wait, how will they DESTROY AI?? It's quite the opposite. AI just simply steals their art style to generate more crap. On another note, I hate how people defend AI images or are too scared of calling people out. I recently called someone out about their fanart looking like AI generated (I'm no expert in this but for the level of detail you would expect an experienced artist to not forget a thumb) and people started downvoting me and saying things like "how would you feel if you worked hard on a drawing and someone said it's AI?" Even though I wasn't attacking the person I was just saying it looked like AI.
@@SangriaDracul this is also a problem cuz someone using ai and saying that they drew it's on their own, but sometimes work can looks like ai but it's actually don't. Anyway those who use ai can't really reach the peak of art so with time it's kinda natural selection ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@@Maikeruartjp But people who use AI and claim it as their own don't want to improve (or don't even draw/paint to begin with) so in the end they're making money off of the hardwork of true artists. Unfortunately it doesn't matter how good you are, if you haven't made a name for yourself already it's 100x harder to find a job now than it ever was because companies will only use AI since it's way cheaper. And in the current state we can still tell AI images apart but in a year or so it's going to be almost impossible. I don't think we'll ever destroy it but we can contain and the only way to do that is implementing strict laws against it.
For Artists who would destroy AI I'm pretty sure you can add every artist who KNOWS that they can draw anything and actually does it in the roster 💀
Realest comment
Ai isn't getting "destroyed" just because real artists still make masterpieces. The fact is, prompt generated art (because it's not an actual artificial intelligence at all) is popular and here to stay, even amongst real artists. Why? Because it's just another great tool that cuts corners, like every good function found in Photoshop or any digital painting program. It saves time and is significantly cheaper. It's efficient.
When someone who knows how to digitally paint also masters prompting, they instantly make themselves more desirable for hire than any of the artists in this video.
@@leetlc441 lol
i think you are forgetting the fact that the law wont let people copyright ai produced products
using ai as a tool however might be posible
@@leetlc441 I've been told this both in art and in my main profession... yet whenever I try to implement them in either, I end up spending as much time correcting the AI problems as I would have making it (or just drawing from the library of work I've already done and tweaking it a bit), or more. I can see using it on a bad day to get around working, but I'm afraid that would get me fired. I'm all for automation, I used to be a dev, but AI tech is pretty much useless for any skilled individual in anything right now. Yeah it might have some narrow use cases, but that little bit of time shaved off on rare occasions isn't really worth wasting your energy with it.
@@leetlc441**sigh** worse part is no matter how shitty this is it’s true 😞
AI "artists" are like people who believe they are fighters just because they bought a gun.
for real
and calling ai generated images as art is like saying diamonds are stronger than steel because most people who know nothing about science think hardness is the same as strenght (diamonds are hard and that meanst they dont wear down or scratch, steel is strong but not as hard as diamonds so steel can be scratched by a diamond but not the other way around, which is why diamonds are used for drills)
Yah, those are the people who play Call of duty and pretend real soldiers
@@arunmax8319 lol
everyone has their strenghts
but tbh its so funny seeing ai bros and tech bros defend ai while being wrong (its like, youre smart but also not smart?)
gamers are good at gaming
real soldiers are good with handling emotions and quick thinking and more
ai "artists" are more like engineers, prompt engineers
actual artists know the process and what makes what it is, like perspective, colors, lighting and shading, style
and are consistent
funny tho seeing prompt engineers saying they need to know art just to tell ai better how to generate asthetic images, tbh the ai prob knows more about art than the prompt engineers
Even a gun needs skills to use, AI prompters are just weak people who hired bodyguards
@@mobisugershot the thing is
AI art just doesn't feel the same
The process is also very unlively if that makes sense
My main gripes with ai art is how they steal from actual hardworking and small artist and just trained their AI to mimic them without the hardwork or the emotion that the artist put inside a drawing and get thousands of likes and money.
like a 1940s mathmetician vs a 2020s grade schooler with an ipad
However, imo, AI drawings have no soul. It may mimic the shapes and line language, but not really the style.
AI Art only screams Beauty but there's no Story / Emotion.
@@SlothziIt's funny when thinking about ai and why it's not going away, is the people paying the artist to make, don't want people with soul, in the past, and even today, these companies spend months or years beating every last bit soul and hope, to turn bright young creative people, into obedient machines vary much like the things replacing them, al this ai did was cut out the middle man.
@@josephross8753There is no artificial intelligence. That's literally just a buzzword coined for the prompt generating tool to get investors interested.
The fact is, this is another tool. Every issue resulting from a generated image can be fixed by a skilled artist. The emotion can still be there with the right user when this tool is used and seen AS a tool and not an "end result". The only reason people say there "can't be emotion" in generated images is because of bias from already KNOWING the image is generated.
its ironic that i got an ai art ad on this video
Xd
I did too- 💀
its crazy how a luxury became a basic commodity so quickly
Fr
My favorite artist is TheCecile. She made me want to draw again, so she has a special place in my heart. A few of my other favorite artists: iromarimorito, zero808w, Shal. E, kuroh.shiro.
@@kaalvanium oh, I also know Cecile, zero and Shall. E XD
omg shal e and kuroshiro i love them!! zero too
omhhh i like them too but guys u should check emilyamiao shes also a disney storyboarder
I love thececile. In the same vein there is hitoimim
theCecile mentioned 👀
My favorite artist is Hanacue. She has a more anime looking style but all of her drawings are so incredibly beautiful and unique! I really admire her artstyle😃
Yeah and the eyes she draws are so beautiful
Omg Samee I was looking for her
I love hanacue!
Correction : Ai generated images. Not AI art.
What's sad is that if I'd seen that stuff like 3 years ago I'd be like "Wow, this is really good art." but if I just randomly saw pictures like that today I'd just assume it was probably AI art without looking it at it that closely.
i miss pinterest from before ai, now every time i want to look at some cool drawings i have to be carefull with ai shit everywhere
0:54 I’d really love to see more of those “re-drawing Ai images” or perhaps you could try and recreate some of your favourite artists art style! and maybe some helpful tips and strategies on making art lmao
I wouldn't encourage it, TBH. It just gives the tech-holes more incentive to generate more and perpetuate the practice.
Yeah nah, there are plenty of old masters if you want to study/redraw/remix. There are plenty of dtiys challenges from real artists online. You can even recreate a scene from your fav film or game if that's the kind of (potential) viral convo you're after.
Redrawing AI slop just legitimizes and brings attention to it. Engage with other artists and their work, not machines. You will learn more from the craftspeople of your community than pixel predicting robots.
@@ryanartward that’s a actually a really good point.
@@meredithweston46399 I really only suggested the Ai one because that’s what got him so much attention in the first place, if you look at his most popular video, the “re-drawing Ai” one, got a million views, I’m really just going off of what the algorithm has pushed out to people.
0:28 bro wtf 💀
Didn't even notice that somehow.
As a video game art director i created pipeline for my team so that they can create art that is virtually impossible for AI to copy. It is designed around hyper extrapolation and forcing nonsensicalness disorder to take shape into making things sense again. The way these science chefs makes food basically.
@@schonkigplavuis8850 sounds cool
Yo I'm a self taught 3d artist myself and would be interested in an anti-ai pipeline for portfolio work, freelance work, etc. I'm aware of stuff like filter programs for stuff like textures/concept art/final renders, but not for anything like 3d models themselves. I'd like to know more!
That sounds really cool dude sounds fun to learn ngl
@@Sageinred my juniors are happy and that makes me happy :)
How does this look?
Please dont call them artist or art
I prefer to use the term "Prompty"
@@ryanartwardI don’t know where, but I’ve seen promptless AI art where the guy paints a general image and the ai fills it in with shadows and details.
*They call us "craftsman". Maybe we should call them "trashman" ??!*
I like to call them art scrapers
"parasites"
0:28 why......
Average ai art enjoyer
@@Maikeruartjp real 😭
The cons of the AI 'art' is that it completely lacks any specificity and subtext. There are numerous artists whose works, despite not being conventional, still feel right and deliberate
Короче, хлопче, ти молодець, з мене підписка)
👍
I think, it's possible to add specificity and subtext to AI art with recent technologies, but almost no one is doing that, cause it's needed solid prompt and many repetitions
I think Mai yoneyama fits this too. Her work is stunning and the colors and composition is quite interesting.
I just want people to be honest about the tools and process.
If you used AI - please say so. I personally wouldn't shame you for that.
As artists we need to understand words hold power. and we need to remove the word ART from any AI poroduced image. in wikipedia art is defined as: Art is a diverse range of human activity and its resulting product that involves creative or imaginative talent generally expressive of technical proficiency, beauty, emotional power, or conceptual ideas. but it lacks what i think is maybe the most important element of art, especially on the XXI century, art is the product of human experience, is what makes some pieces of musics, visual arts, leterature stand out of lol technical manuals. seriously art moves you, it can make you feel sad or happy. and is something ai images lack the look plastic, serial made, they lack soul, spunk. so they don't deserve to be called art. photoghraphy could be the closes case to what AI is and weell most photographjy is simply not art. and most of what makes it be near art is just the beautyt of nature itself, nature being whatever subject is photographed, i now very few photographers that could be considered artists and they aren't much without their subjects.
Every time I mention ai in my videos we get this 😐
I know several artists who have incorporated AI into their pipelines by training the model on their own work, and you wouldn't believe it - their work hasn't lost any of its soul or expressiveness.
The problem is not that AI can't show soul or expressiveness. AI itself can't do anything - it's a tool. The problem is that 99% of people who use it do not have the understanding and vision of soul and expressiveness. To get a piece of art, it's not enough to just type in a random promt and get a cool picture. To get something really impressive with AI, you have to know how to do it. At the very least, you should have at least an idea of how to get the same thing without AI, and ideally, you should be an artist.
The works of ordinary people with AI are like amateur photos on an iPhone. Yes, something is depicted on them, but its artistic value is about zero. However, if a person who knows what he wants to get, knows how to get it and sees the end result inside himself takes up such an instrument, he will get it even with AI.
For exaple this one cdnb.artstation.com/p/assets/images/images/068/116/741/large/ksenia-kiseleva-faavesa-tiefling-party.jpg?1697026110
Or this one cdnb.artstation.com/p/assets/images/images/071/721/143/large/ksenia-kiseleva-faavesa-.jpg?1705793977
@@lognarkiexactly this. When treated as a tool in the process by real artists, image generation programs make everything more efficient. It's a no-brainer. Every one of the great artists in the video likely spent weeks to months on each piece. If they learned how to incorporate the generation programs, they could cut that time in half without losing the final vision and certainly without losing the emotion.
I correlate this with motion capture. There are people that record a performance and call it done with no cleanup, because they aren't animators. Then there are animators that take motion capture data and cleans them. The best results are from when the animators utilize motion capture. When randoms do, it looks ugly and jank.
You can do that, but the vast majority of the people will still consider the generated images as art. You know why? Because that's what they are.
@@OnigoroshiZero thats like saying you shouldnt trust an engineer because most people who dont know anything about engineering think that a car that doesnt crumble is safer than a car that crumbles
you should know that art has been around for many MANY years
cave art for example, we humans made it and we have a concience
emotion and personality is given to a piece of art when someone makes it
a piece of code can not draw art
it generates images, you just think that image is art because of the cel shading and outlines and stuff
you draw art in a flow, not instantly using some words
people who use prompts to generate art are the same as people who ask an artist to draw what they want/need
Ai Artists are like well known warriors with no effort nor proof of how they imrpoved, and actually, they just stole the other unknown warriors’ efforts.
These 3 art gods, Guweiz, WLOP and Sam Does Arts are responsible for making me put into practice the dream I've always had since I was a child, painting. Especially Guweiz, he's my favorite artist! I'm happy to discover Wataboku now, as I really like complementary colors. And ai " " " art " " " is just images generated, it's too far from the art concept. Any artist can make an image with greater artistic value, like, being greater than "zero" is easy. Nowadays, some artists implement AI into the process, but in this way it is just a tool like any other and is just part of the process, not the process itself.
mika pikazo is my favorite
These artists will destroy AI because AI learned from them.
I mean they are too bad?
As a programmer I'm throwing in an "and my axe" onto this pile....
Me too brother
This gives me hope. Thank you
Reasons why people hate ai. Job Displacement: Many worry that AI will replace human workers, especially in industries like manufacturing, customer service, and even creative fields, leading to unemployment.
Privacy and Security: AI systems can gather and analyze vast amounts of data, raising concerns about personal privacy, data misuse, and surveillance.
Bias and Fairness: AI can perpetuate and even amplify biases present in the data it's trained on, leading to unfair or discriminatory outcomes in decision-making processes, such as hiring, law enforcement, or lending.
Loss of Human Control: There are fears that advanced AI systems could become uncontrollable or surpass human understanding, leading to unintended consequences.
Ethical Concerns: The development of AI technologies, particularly in areas like autonomous weapons or surveillance systems, raises ethical questions about responsibility, consent, and the role of AI in human lives.
Creativity and Human Uniqueness: Some people feel threatened by AI's growing role in creative processes, like generating art, music, or writing, believing it diminishes human creativity and uniqueness.
Economic Inequality: AI can disproportionately benefit large corporations or certain sectors of society, widening the gap between the rich and the poor
AI customer service is useless. It doesn't tell me anything I can't already find on the website, and I always try to solve my own problems with information available on the website first.
I just don't like that some lazy ass saying that he is an artist cuz he typed a bunch of words
I guess it's my sign to finally draw pregnant furry satoru gojo oiled up.🎉
Yo ima check out these artists, nice vid
👍
Pluvium grandis is so skilled and his speedpaints never fail to amaze me
@@raindrop_090 He is the part two that is already uploaded 👀
Its ironic cause some people made Ai models for Sam does art
I really liked the 1st and the last artist! Gonna check them out
Beautiful artworks and immense amount of work has been put into this artworks. I hope that AI would be not a shortcut but a toolkit.
I destroy AI programs everyday by submitting horrible pieces of art
best comment right here
Send them a picture of a girl having hands as eyes,and feet as hands. Their hair is just tree branch and their lips is a piece of sock. Or whatever
@@stxxrlight_zone Bold of you to assume I haven't
@@nopenopenopepikachu5206 OMG--
Now I dare you to not send them horrible art,but just scribbles
@@stxxrlight_zone damn, we need to make that a trend. daily posting of absurd art to make the ai shit itself
Dao Le Trong, Kan Liu, Devin Elle Kurtz and Loish - I would definitely add them to the list
Hanaque and horamoe, are really good to! Theres alot more but i cant remember all of the names =>=
Waterboku cooked 😭
more like ai fart LMAO XD!!!!
Ai learned from us, we will always be better
My fav artist - the first three, you showed in this video and also: Loish, Kuvshinov Ilya, feefal... And mooore amazing artist who create NSFW stuff
Good idea. I'll begin to do it on 3d.
Demizu posuka would chew ai up. The author of the promised neverland has a way with detail. Making messy art looks so good
Realistically Karla Ortiz. She’s already doing a lot for the art community
you said artist will destroy AI but you're just telling us on how to improve AI art so thanks dude now we know what type of data we should feed it!
@@F55-is 💀
Yes Ai sucks. Saying why would really help. Companies that invested in Ai images and train Ai on art gathered (stolen) from artists on the internet are losing money because Ai images can be very uncontrolable. I've heard professionals in the field say generated images with math as a base will be more accurate.The thing I hate the most is how souless Ai images are. I just want some real information and protection for our work.
Have you heard of ControlNet?
I liked that u say what is your favourite at everyone
Hell no I realize that I forgot to do that in the second part
I want to be one of such great artists one day
Lesgooo
Other than some of the ones the video already mentions, some of my favorites that inspire me are Yuumei, Posuka Demizu, Akihiko Yoshida, AsyaYordanova, and so many others. The thing is, at least for me, no matter how advanced AI becomes, nothing will impress and amaze me more than what a human can do. That, and nothing will replace the satisfaction of creating something with your own skill (even if you're a beginner like me). Typing a few words and pressing a button just seems so empty in comparison.
I love demizu posuka too. Esp how they draw perspectives
good news for all artists: AI "art" now falls under copyright laws!
@@Noggo ye heard that too, they are a bit late with this decision
The thingnainartist keep forgetting is "stylization" and "stimulation" a machine can only imitate what's already their but it can never dream
You only dream what you already saw, sooooo…
@@PEDROGARCIA-qj3gr imagine saying that to a chair
ai doesnt have a conscience so its as conscious as a chair
sooo
i wonder how a chair is gonna dream
@@AriTu-lv7lz uh sir this is a wendy's
burger kind is right down this street
@@AriTu-lv7lz lol its ok
i mightve went a bit offensive with the "sooo" part
but i get your point, art is art
but the thing is that ai gives their creators money while abusing some laws and such, kinda like a monopoly, this reduces traffic from real artists and increases ai slop that was made in a second without any more effort than typing in less than 5 sentences max (i think)
ai art is great for personal or research purposes
bad for monitization and making a career out of
If you combine those AI with photohop and krita redrawing it is really good though, way better then an ordinary low level artist. Sure it needs 1 or 2 days but better then 1 or 2 weeks. Time is precious so think about it.
TamplierPainter really pushed me as a young artist
I'm a believer that only story teller will survive. But so far, AI is not even AI, it's a huge data base, if an artist has the same amount data in head, the artist is probably gonna do better work.
But again, normal people don't give a F if it's good or not, it looks fine then they will buy it, no matter who made it.
"normal people don't give a F if it's good or not"
Correction: you don't decide what is good or not.
And then AI just learns this
Every artist, small or professional is a galaxy apart from AI "artists"
Two of my favorite artists are Carles Dalmau (made a lot of the art in the game ‘Cult of the Lamb’ and multiple webcomics) and Bonesaw (also known as Shogunned, who is making a webcomic called, well, Shogunned). They both have very different styles and feelings to them but their works are both so beautiful in their own ways.
U can find Zeen Chin 😮his artwork look really good too
Wataboku was actually the one who inspired me to strive on getting better and better at art
honestly going back to physical is probably one of the most likely ways this whole ai thing ends
Yeah, but AI can mimic that....
i was just thinking about the fact that so much is said here oh my god AI only steals pictures from others (yes ok it's kind of like that) or it is said AI pictures are not art because they come from other artists, but somehow i also have the feeling if someone took a picture from an artist and drew it one to one no one would say the same thing but they would say it's art because a human drew it. (this is just a thought of mine) but i also think that what is meant is that people spam everything with ki pictures. I think if you use this tool (and i don't see it as anything else) in combination with your own drawings etc it would still be ok.
Aidalro art is also really good.
Love the videos
Ok. Those artists are good but their consistent style and subjects make them very good material to train AI and so I think that counteracts the point of the video. 😅 I agree on the storytelling though.
all i know is an ai "artist" could never come close to replicating remedios varo. you need an actual brain to do that. i love her work.
Is interesting that you have chosen the most "AI-stable" trending artists of the moment hahaha
0:11 wtf I didn't know that😂
holy shit I almost had a heart attack
@@KITSUMELO holy shit, why?
The only reason I don't like AI art is that you often can't tell it is AI, otherwise I am completely fine with it existing.
this is why ima get BETTER AT ART, NEBER GIB UP GYS!!!!
I personally love delete_au and yoneyamai's art!! You should check them out!
Bill sienkiewicz
Barron storrey
Dave mckean
Feng zhu
Brom
Chris achiellos
John zack
Frank Frazetta
Boris Vallejo
Jose gonzalez
Estaban maroto
Kim jung gi
Bobby chui
And many many more.
Please find great artists wherever possible
I liked the video but I feel like the images were going a bit too fast
I rendered it at 24 fps and at normal speed it was as a slideshow so I speed it up a bit to add more frames 🥲
SAM DOES ART MAHAHAHAHAHA HE GOATED
Unless we are lied to about what humanity looks like, there is no AI that has come close to being human. It is it’s own entity, but it is not us and it never will be.
I feel like ai is deliberately attacking people with these incredible art styles
The Pulp Fiction reference is hilarious!
Wlop is the one who introduced to me the this passion
Mika Pikazo?!?!?! You gotta look into that artist mannnnnnn
Pls dont use ai, stick to pens and brushes
Try to recreate a piece using ai and you will fail. It can create nice random stuff, but as soon as you try to tell a story it lets you down.
I kind of hate when artist say i dont hate ai art because its replacing me rather i hate because they use my art without my permission.
So if assuming its true why do they get angry when people use their image for ai art but dont use them commercially. I mean if the whole purpose is to spread joy then what about those who cant buy this joy. It cost 50 dollar at minimum for digital art more if you are commissioning someone popular. And the basic starting salary in my country is 250$. So its expensive. A kid cant commission u.
I understand and believe artist have the right to do whatever they want with their art. They created it. But to say that they want to spread their art among people and be a bich when someone uses their art non commercialy is a scum move.
The reason im saying this is because im a student. I dont have time to sit in room for 4 hours and study art and come up with idea. So obviously i used Leonardo to make a lot of reference image in a short time to come up with some ideas because when u dont prompt properly it gives something unique. From those AI ART i got the idea to make a fantasy image with whales as clouds and what it might look like. I completed it and posted on fb with also mentiong that i took help of ai. To my horror not only i was banned but also some furry artist decided to take screenshot post it and humiliate me since i cant "come up with ideas". Yeah so fuk artist. I do art for fun and i will gladly use ai art if it satisfies me. Also what do artist actually mean my creativity when they make the same type of art over and over again with different locations and room design?
Let's be real any body that is afraid of ai is afraid of being replaced
No, it just sucks in general too. I quit online gaming because of bots, now the bots are coming to RL too smh. We will never be able to fully trust any content we see again, we won't even be able to trust anyone to be an actual person online or even over the phone apart from actually meeting them. We have entered a new dark age.
Basically AI 'art' is a gacha lmao. AI generated image is same as google image search, type something and voila it's pop some random stuffs close to the prompt.
They want to be in art community so bad and they pass by all the way possible to explain that they do art too and they are the same as digital artist like bro that become embarrassing
I really like koolen recently.
Ai: Everybody wants to be my enemy 🧘🧘🧘
artists should beat ai cuz the artstyle and vibes and realiesm and life
YOU NEEEEED TO COVER YUUMEIART IF YOU MAKE A PART THREE!!!!!!!!!!
OKAY!!!!!
Maybe*
Wish Granted. They already have. Going to watch the video starting now. Enjoy.
terrance osborne is my favorite. i learned about him in school
Osborne? Spiderman?
What a clickbait, I thought it'd be about artists creating protection trick to avoid getting their drawings become ai base, but these are just... good artists. They have nothing to do with destroying AI.
@@letsreadtextbook1687 yes they are but ai sucks compared with them
The video never advertised that your just dumb lol 😂😂😂😂
You can use glaze or nightshade
@@Maikeruartjpyou are basically saying "the pencil sucks compared to the artist".
Are you that ignorant of what generative programs actually are? Artificial intelligence isn't actually a thing in these programs. They are literally just tools to be used. Either the user is an artist or they are not.
Do you also take issue with the clone tool, magic wand, or any other tool available and regularly used by digital artists? They are effectively the same thing. In the right hands, the tools are wonderful. That's all it comes down to.
When a real artist utilizes generation tools, their workflow and efficiency is unmatched and they don't lose their vision.
@@leetlc441 pencil sucks without artist, and artist without pencil
Just want to point out that ai gets worse with over saturation of ai art there for soon it will implode into dirt
I think i already saw ia with the style of sam , its kinda trendy
One of my old ass teachers said that though went into ai and that its basically good. WHAT
Wait, how will they DESTROY AI?? It's quite the opposite. AI just simply steals their art style to generate more crap.
On another note, I hate how people defend AI images or are too scared of calling people out. I recently called someone out about their fanart looking like AI generated (I'm no expert in this but for the level of detail you would expect an experienced artist to not forget a thumb) and people started downvoting me and saying things like "how would you feel if you worked hard on a drawing and someone said it's AI?" Even though I wasn't attacking the person I was just saying it looked like AI.
@@SangriaDracul this is also a problem cuz someone using ai and saying that they drew it's on their own, but sometimes work can looks like ai but it's actually don't. Anyway those who use ai can't really reach the peak of art so with time it's kinda natural selection ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@@Maikeruartjp But people who use AI and claim it as their own don't want to improve (or don't even draw/paint to begin with) so in the end they're making money off of the hardwork of true artists. Unfortunately it doesn't matter how good you are, if you haven't made a name for yourself already it's 100x harder to find a job now than it ever was because companies will only use AI since it's way cheaper. And in the current state we can still tell AI images apart but in a year or so it's going to be almost impossible. I don't think we'll ever destroy it but we can contain and the only way to do that is implementing strict laws against it.
Its all the same. Ai is like Majin buu, it will absorb everyone and get stronger.😢
Emilyena has a very gloomy, dark way of drawing characters:) i like her
how will they destroy the AI? I hope their work doesn't get stolen by it
they need to poison their work
Digital art tools need to be better in helping artists be ahead of AI
Ai cant make art! Art has emotions machines never will!!!
Si'ku also makes good art
one day ill find a artist that can make art like this but that atleast tries to have a male in the pics.