New Designed The Franco German EMBT [Enhanced Main Battle Tank]

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 вер 2022
  • The Franco-German main battle tank is, developed under the EMBT [Enhanced Main Battle Tank] project. New designs four-man crew, distributed as follows: commander, gunner, driver, and combat operator.
    The Belgian online portal Army Reconnaissance makes a brief retrospective of the latest weapons platform expected to conquer the European market. EMBT is developed by two companies. These are the French company NEXTER Defense Systems and the German company KMW [Krauss-Maffei Wegmann]. Army Reconnaissance defines the EMBT as mobile, fast and flexible like the Leopard tank, which has the French firepower of the Leclerc tank. The tank is armed with a 120mm smoothbore gun. It fires all NATO ammunition of this caliber. The tank has an automatic charging system. It is connected directly to the 120mm gun. As secondary armament, the EMBT has two machine guns. One is a 12.7mm coaxial machine gun, and the other is a 7.62mm caliber. Both are mounted on the dome, but in a different configuration. The tank has one more gun - 30mm mounted in the rear part of the turret. It is designed by a French company, as are the other weapons on the tank.
    #embt
    #leopard tank
    #tanks

КОМЕНТАРІ • 285

  • @shaggybottomtext8363
    @shaggybottomtext8363 Рік тому +39

    Did I hear unmanned operations? Alright fellow war thunder enthusiasts whose ready to get drafted for our expertise?

  • @drgonzo305
    @drgonzo305 9 місяців тому +32

    I love how everyone is going back to the multiple turreted tanks of the post WW1, Pre WW2 soviet and German designs

    • @fistan5447
      @fistan5447 6 місяців тому +5

      Tanks always had multiple weapons. Now we can automate it, which will be necessery against drones. People cant even tell if they're up there. Need an AI detection system to handle that threat.

    • @hotdog9262
      @hotdog9262 3 місяці тому +1

      @@fistan5447 automated `fire at anything that moves` would be very useful in an assault as well

    • @fistan5447
      @fistan5447 3 місяці тому

      @@hotdog9262 drone recognition system would be far easier to make than a true IFF system which recognizes which side the infantry is on though. Tech would be around a decade apart i'd imagine, considering how much more powerful the on-board AI system would need to be.

  • @israelcenteno4398
    @israelcenteno4398 4 місяці тому +3

    Amazing futuristic chassis design

  • @Mr.McWatson
    @Mr.McWatson Рік тому +57

    "It's french too though, so there's got to be something weird?"
    "there's one more gun, a 30mm mounted in the back of the turret"
    "Ah!"

    • @nikkotan2840
      @nikkotan2840 Рік тому +8

      Good for pickin' those nasty drones though.

    • @majormoolah5056
      @majormoolah5056 Рік тому +7

      Have you seen the new Abrams X with a very similar solution?
      But it is American so it must be brilliant then ;)

    • @jean-philippebobin3732
      @jean-philippebobin3732 8 місяців тому

      ​@@majormoolah5056it is older than the Abrams X

    • @cstgraphpads2091
      @cstgraphpads2091 6 місяців тому

      @@jean-philippebobin3732 Not really. The Abrams X is just an Abrams chassis with all of the improvements integrated instead of bolted on.

    • @jean-philippebobin3732
      @jean-philippebobin3732 6 місяців тому

      @@cstgraphpads2091 The Turret has quite a few change, so I would not put them in the same categorie.

  • @gforce0311
    @gforce0311 Рік тому +12

    Looks sweet!

  • @konspearosea2488
    @konspearosea2488 Рік тому +11

    i think it looks quite cool

  • @AkselGAL
    @AkselGAL 6 місяців тому +12

    Before Ukraine, would have seen this tank as an advancement.
    It looks decent, with active protection and a 30mm drone defense turret.
    The option for bigger calibre fittings is mixed. Since it depends on the recoil. Turret does not look like it has a lot of space left for more recoil.
    It lacks the idea of the "4th floating crew member" from the KF51, that either handles drones or in the future tank drones.

    • @cstgraphpads2091
      @cstgraphpads2091 6 місяців тому +5

      Did you miss the 4th crew member, the "combat operator"?

    • @raptorfr
      @raptorfr 6 місяців тому +1

      "Leclerc" turret was already be fitted with 140mm gun. Leclerc "Terminator" was done with turret T4 prototype in eighties and 2016).

  • @_Blades
    @_Blades 5 місяців тому +2

    The War Thunder leaks on this one are gonna be crazy 🔥🔥🔥

  • @videre8884
    @videre8884 Рік тому +8

    Can the cannon also be charged with a USB charger?

  • @michalbergr9006
    @michalbergr9006 6 місяців тому

    Looks great 😍

  • @Monkeynuts1738
    @Monkeynuts1738 3 місяці тому +1

    As a American if ww3 starts I'm going to move there just so I can whip this ride! That's a real tank right there

  • @krakca
    @krakca 9 місяців тому +9

    I think this thing is so cool and seemingly perfectly fit for modern warfare.
    Especially love the slimmed down turret, sturdy but saves tons (literally) of armour.

    • @dionisko1723
      @dionisko1723 7 місяців тому

      Ни одна западная техника не приспособлена для войны. Полное дерьмо.

    • @AhmedAdly11
      @AhmedAdly11 6 місяців тому +4

      Sorry dude... but the Trophy system turned out to be absolute shit.
      The tank is no better than the paper it was designed on

    • @krakca
      @krakca 6 місяців тому +1

      @@AhmedAdly11 Trophy has little to do with this tank or my comment
      Still stops atgms, drones are simply a different threat.

    • @Theinitedstatesofamerics12345
      @Theinitedstatesofamerics12345 6 місяців тому +2

      @@dionisko1723y’all had “some” tanks destroyed in Ukraine

    • @Seo-km9ik
      @Seo-km9ik 6 місяців тому +6

      @@AhmedAdly11 And where did you come up with this conclusion? I've seen countless videos of Trophy intercepting ATGMs and RPGs. Funnily enough, all the videos that claim that Trophy didn't do anything is when it wasn't even deployed or below minimum range where the Receiver can't slew the APS fast enough. Ryan McBeth did a wonderful analysis on this.

  • @mralmnthwyfemnin5783
    @mralmnthwyfemnin5783 Рік тому +9

    Looks pretty badass!!!

  • @DrunkenJinger
    @DrunkenJinger 6 місяців тому +1

    The turret looks like one big bullet catch.

  • @khaiphamba5991
    @khaiphamba5991 6 місяців тому +2

    What the hell? It looks too good and too expensive to be used in the battlefield.

  • @insanitymanic
    @insanitymanic 6 місяців тому +1

    General : How much will it cost ?
    Tank Seller : Oh, only 15 million
    General : Attaching wheels to infantryman, it is then

  • @victorsforza6213
    @victorsforza6213 Рік тому +3

    Looks like the leclerc and leopard tanks had a baby.. hahahah

  • @GenghisVern
    @GenghisVern 3 місяці тому

    When could they field their first 500? How does this E-series compare to the K-series in Poland?

  • @elcaddor
    @elcaddor Рік тому +9

    EMBT designed to carry Nexter ASCALON 140 mm canon

    • @nikkotan2840
      @nikkotan2840 Рік тому +1

      MBT is a Universal tank platform so it is only limited to such an extent as 130mm any bigger the tank is imbalance and would lose its center gravity making the tank unstable during firing on long periods of engagement but I guess the world is ready for Heavy and Super Heavy MBT platforms with the advancement of metallurgy roads and bridges will certainly be capable of accommodating such massive tanks in the future with that 140mm, 150mm, 160mm, and even railgun tanks are not that far out. Modern technology and metallurgy make our current infrastructure like roads and bridges limited for now.

    • @philv3941
      @philv3941 Рік тому +3

      ​@@nikkotan2840 no, this turret is really designed for the 140mm ascalon.
      And with a special low pressure chamber + special alloy, thos gun is lighter than the 130 of Rheinmetal.
      They fit a 120 for the demo because the 140 proto version are presently in heavy testing in Spain.

    • @raptorfr
      @raptorfr 6 місяців тому +2

      @@nikkotan2840 Leclerc was already be fitted with this 140mm on T4 turret prototype in eighties and 2016. Weight 60t (metric), same as modern MBT. Leclerc weight 55-58t, and more with AZUR or CLARA kit. Its the same turret architecture so...

    • @nikkotan2840
      @nikkotan2840 6 місяців тому

      @@raptorfr U have a point, because same thing happens to the Abrams prototype which have a 140 or 150 barrel or something but was discontinued.

  • @Varvarmisanthrope
    @Varvarmisanthrope 6 місяців тому +1

    The weakness of this tank is that there should be 10,000 of it.

  • @viniciusverissimo-uz2cs
    @viniciusverissimo-uz2cs 6 місяців тому +1

    Tanque futurista demais

  • @paladinsmith7050
    @paladinsmith7050 2 місяці тому

    That 30 mm on top needs 180 degrees rotation and a mini radar for drones. Switch it to a 20 mm with airburst ammunition and a scanner for lasers to detect incoming ATGMs.

  • @MiracleManMatt
    @MiracleManMatt 6 місяців тому

    That turret doesn't look all that robust!

  • @jaymac7203
    @jaymac7203 Рік тому +23

    Now that is a beautiful looking tank! 😍

  • @sandysand3097
    @sandysand3097 6 місяців тому

    That chasis looks very fermilliar..

  • @karimbelhaj6342
    @karimbelhaj6342 Рік тому +2

    price ?

  • @alphaenterprise2232
    @alphaenterprise2232 6 місяців тому +1

    Looks like modernised Leclerc

  • @iamtesting3824
    @iamtesting3824 6 місяців тому

    very futuristic aesthetics

    • @Faezine
      @Faezine 6 місяців тому

      “What you’re seeing is advanced warfare”..

    • @cayden2744
      @cayden2744 6 місяців тому

      Very modern tbh, KF-51 is futuristic.

  • @charleshorseman55
    @charleshorseman55 8 місяців тому +2

    If both of those top guns can rotate, it's a win.

  • @Elbereth_TV
    @Elbereth_TV 8 місяців тому +1

    this is literally just a leopard with a new turret

  • @allenliu8820
    @allenliu8820 6 місяців тому +3

    well considering the video was 1 year old and is only now gaining traction
    lets just say that this tank ain't gonna be in service in either the german or french militaries

  • @dharmdevil
    @dharmdevil 6 місяців тому +1

    land mine says hi

  • @Neklar
    @Neklar 5 місяців тому

    The turret looks like a perfect shot trap.

    • @lucasdevries5131
      @lucasdevries5131 5 місяців тому

      Turret isn’t a shot trap. And if the turret ring got hit by apfsds it’s over anyway

    • @Neklar
      @Neklar 5 місяців тому

      @@lucasdevries5131 I'd recess turrets into the hull by a few inches to give a projectile lesser chance of disabling the turret traverse if hit without penetration. But new projectiles will always arise & with enough force they'll eventually get through. So long as the crew are in a massively shielded area behind loads of titanium & can escape is the main thing. For now there's very little can be done to stop sabot rounds against any tank and sabots will only get more innovative so it won't be long before we see tandem charges integrated into sabot rounds.

    • @Neklar
      @Neklar 5 місяців тому

      @@lucasdevries5131 Hey I just saw your lego rifle video! I love it! The mechanism is really good.

  • @ahmetbayken3281
    @ahmetbayken3281 5 місяців тому

    Size Altay tankını öneririm.

  • @arielalarde6788
    @arielalarde6788 7 місяців тому +1

    They must add anti drone loitering, munition otherwise these is a big target in battlefield

  • @milsimmaniac711
    @milsimmaniac711 Рік тому +6

    yes a co french german tank cause that worked out the last few times

    • @cuinanathan8496
      @cuinanathan8496 Рік тому +2

      But french and Germany have really good relations now. I find that americans have a problem with the past

    • @mimamo
      @mimamo Рік тому +1

      In what century do you live? Come on, move on to modern times.

  • @user-uo5ks3px7v
    @user-uo5ks3px7v 8 місяців тому

    How many millions $/€ coust this?

  • @vermillion.__-_.
    @vermillion.__-_. 6 місяців тому

    holy cow! it is real :O

  • @user-dx8jw1cu8p
    @user-dx8jw1cu8p 2 місяці тому

    does it have WIFI ?

  • @fireblade-eu
    @fireblade-eu Рік тому +70

    Expecting to conquer European market? They just lost the best market - Poland.

    • @NotUnymous
      @NotUnymous Рік тому

      I dont think that Poland ever was a choice. The Anti-German racism of Poland is well known in Europe. It's rather bothering whats happening in that country 😔

    • @paxundpeace9970
      @paxundpeace9970 Рік тому +19

      Poland was looking for a current production tank that would be possible to deliver instantly.

    • @BS-vm5bt
      @BS-vm5bt Рік тому +15

      Not really when polish economy collapses thx to its unsustainable spending. Poland is going to end up like the russian economy pre war or even worse since poland does not have hydrocarbons. 5% of gdp is going to destroy economic growth and since we are heading in to a recession higher military spending will just make that recession worse. I prefer a EU millitary, where our common interests are followed not individual nations states which is what germanies blocking tank exports stems from. Its germany prioritizing its own interests above the EU interests.

    • @petel7418
      @petel7418 Рік тому +1

      But why Norway(for example) ordered Leo 2a7s instead of these..? Aren't these ready yet?

    • @evobsm2328
      @evobsm2328 Рік тому +17

      ​@@petel7418do you even know how long it takes to get from prototype and test vehicles to production?

  • @jeffstrong4580
    @jeffstrong4580 6 місяців тому

    Looks like K2 Black Panther.

  • @rionkahia9649
    @rionkahia9649 6 місяців тому

    Production costs 😳

  • @jeangabrielkahane2961
    @jeangabrielkahane2961 Рік тому +14

    Not going to come into existence beyond the prototype stage.
    Each country is maneuvering for the status of lead producer ( the name of the game is retaining jobs at home) and that stupid game shall kill the project. As a French citizen, I can't say I am happy with this situation.

    • @nobodyisbest
      @nobodyisbest Рік тому +10

      Sorry to put it so bluntly, but very few defense cooperation projects with France ever go beyond the prototype stage. Germany, the Netherlands, the UK, Spain and Italy have worked together on a myriad of projects and that seems to work. Not so much when France is involved ...

    • @ooloongjohnson4015
      @ooloongjohnson4015 Рік тому +5

      @@nobodyisbest Rafale has been doing rather well recently... The same might happen with this tank

    • @nobodyisbest
      @nobodyisbest Рік тому +7

      @@ooloongjohnson4015 Rafale was solely developed by France. In fact, France initially wanted to cooperate with the UK, Spain and Germany on the Eurofighter, but found the compromise bit too difficult and went it alone with Rafale.

    • @ooloongjohnson4015
      @ooloongjohnson4015 Рік тому +7

      @@nobodyisbest true, french producers can be stubborn in wanting to meet their own needs which makes it hard to cooperate with them, but their industry does have some good points just as every other european nation does, however hard to cooperate with, while this may also be true with other nations sometimes

    • @nobodyisbest
      @nobodyisbest Рік тому +1

      @@ooloongjohnson4015 Yep, French defense industry does make good products, no doubt.

  • @-SuTen-
    @-SuTen- 7 місяців тому +2

    France and Gremany building a tank together will just end in disaster...

    • @NameGoesHere21
      @NameGoesHere21 6 місяців тому

      What France usually does is partner with someone on an aircraft or armour project to split the development costs, then go their own way and build a France only vehicle to suit their needs 100%.

    • @mudmud.
      @mudmud. 6 місяців тому +1

      @@NameGoesHere21 they did it with what for exemple ?

  • @TonyMasukidi
    @TonyMasukidi 6 місяців тому

    Does T 14 mean something to you?

    • @jodr4035
      @jodr4035 3 місяці тому +2

      *Literally breaksdown during a military parade.*
      Putin: Well that sucks. Guess we gotta go fight with the T-90M again.

    • @deckdeckard5297
      @deckdeckard5297 2 місяці тому +1

      Lol, it doesn't seem to mean a lot to the Russians themselves. 🤣

  • @xeqaniceferli9331
    @xeqaniceferli9331 6 місяців тому

    L I G E R 🦁🐯

  • @Freedom9X
    @Freedom9X Рік тому

    Who will operate the 30mm cannon?

    • @gvertm3158
      @gvertm3158 9 місяців тому

      Computer and artificial intelligence

    • @Freedom9X
      @Freedom9X 9 місяців тому

      @@gvertm3158 What, are you for real?

    • @tomendruweit9386
      @tomendruweit9386 8 місяців тому

      it can be operated by the commander with AI assitance or opperate independnetly as anti air. @@Freedom9X

    • @remistiegler5302
      @remistiegler5302 8 місяців тому +1

      ​@@Freedom9Xno, all the crew will be helped by AI but the 30mm cannon will be controlled by the "systems operator", the 4th crewman with the drones

  • @risingmoon893
    @risingmoon893 7 місяців тому +1

    From what I can visually see from the tank is that the gunner does not have an independent weapon sight and only has a fixed sight which isn't good.

  • @To.Si.Ma.
    @To.Si.Ma. 9 місяців тому

    "Fix the cigarette lighter"

  • @Rebellion90s
    @Rebellion90s 2 місяці тому

    No offense but this tank might be obsolete even before it enters service. Well, look at Doom Turtle Russian Edition, they maybe crude field modification but it was for some good reasons, and it could reshape any future service MBTs. The 4th gen MBT, the T-14 Armata is very short lived, and we might have a chance to see 5th gen MBTs very soon.

  • @SuperJUANCHO7
    @SuperJUANCHO7 11 місяців тому

    i want to be a tank crewman in one of thoose, too bad i am getting old and i am not european UnU

  • @tygrysjas
    @tygrysjas 6 місяців тому

    Niemcy są najlepsi w zabijaniu ludzi ćwiczyli różne opcje dlatego robią najlepsze narzędzia do zabijania w budownictwie też są mistrzami zwiedzałem Auschwitz widziałem na własne oczy a komory gazowe majstersztyk

  • @Bunimadios
    @Bunimadios 6 місяців тому

    Viele wiederholte Szenen, ich hätte Video schneiden helfen müssen! ;-)

  • @user-ri2vp7qt7f
    @user-ri2vp7qt7f 6 місяців тому

    설계도 넘겨줘 우리가 반값으로 만들어 줄게.

  • @paulnewsome6289
    @paulnewsome6289 Місяць тому

    So are they going to enter this machine in the 'Miss Tank of the World' beauty pageant, or send it to Ukraine where it can do some good?

  • @Richard-vt7it
    @Richard-vt7it 3 місяці тому

    The turret going to stop a lot of rounds. All these new tanks are basic copy's if each other. They come with the same bells and whistles they just name them different things
    The only part I like is the rear facing 7.62 now that's going back to the old tanks. What's old is knew

  • @markobakovic627
    @markobakovic627 6 місяців тому

    Future Tanks will be smaller faster one man crews or like drones remotely controlled smaller caliber half automatic gun and capable to drive 150 km but you will have 30 000 of them…this is how I would do them

  • @cheatcode6040
    @cheatcode6040 11 місяців тому +1

    doesnt LEO2 turret is better than french mbt turret ?

  • @F76986jhg
    @F76986jhg 11 місяців тому

    AbramsX version France.

  • @IsraelMilitaryChannel
    @IsraelMilitaryChannel 6 місяців тому +3

    One of the best looking tanks.

  • @user-pv6rw3ls3p
    @user-pv6rw3ls3p 6 місяців тому +3

    Stupid waste of money, they need to go with the Panther KF51. Its germany though so they wont go with either. They'll decide to upgrade their lepeord 2's and only get through about half of them.

  • @emailprofissional8485
    @emailprofissional8485 Рік тому +1

    Aí vem um drone iraniano com motor de motocicleta barata e kabum....

    • @remistiegler5302
      @remistiegler5302 8 місяців тому +1

      The 30mm AA cannon saying hello to the drone and kabooming it 500m further

  • @ludovic7439
    @ludovic7439 9 місяців тому

    Trop lourd , trop lent...Un truc Allemand...

  • @enricoraineri4941
    @enricoraineri4941 10 місяців тому +5

    This looks like an evolution of the Leclerc. Nothing to do with a new project! My idea is that in future armies the complete integration of all means, light, medium and heavy, with the various defensive and offensive systems (missiles, drones, etc.), will be of vital importance. And the survival of the soldiers who have to fight, live and suffer in an eventual global war will be of vital importance. So for now I think passive and active protection of new MBTs is still the priority. As priority will be increasingly sophisticated weaponry that guarantees first-shot kills at ever-increasing distances and high reaction speeds.

    • @kneegrow4656
      @kneegrow4656 8 місяців тому +5

      It's a completely new chassis, based on the Leopard 2. The engine, the tracks and the transmission are all german. Most of it's protective elements are Israeli. It only looks like a leclerc to an amateur as the turret closely resembles the leclerc.

    • @raptorfr
      @raptorfr 6 місяців тому

      @@kneegrow4656 ITS a leopard2 chassis evolution AND a Leclerc turret evolution. Its 2in1

  • @xeqaniceferli9331
    @xeqaniceferli9331 6 місяців тому

    Only 140-mm gun, only

  • @china_airguns
    @china_airguns Рік тому +15

    The KMW EMBT turret has far too many attachments and positions that make it easier for attackers to get grenades and rockets caught in the superstructure. The LEO2 and also the current French MBT have a much more "streamlined" turret from which shells and rockets can ricochet. I think that's a very big disadvantage. The new MBT from Reinmetall KF51 is the better option, at least as far as the tower design is concerned. There is not much else to say about the technical performance, but the design of the Panther is really superior.

    • @shaggybottomtext8363
      @shaggybottomtext8363 Рік тому

      I want modern panther :(

    • @pablor5628
      @pablor5628 Рік тому +11

      In the 21st century it's almost impossible for shells to ricochet with modern ammunition, also, rockets don't "get caught" on the superstructure, they instantly impact, and grenades are for infantry. There are many flaws to this tank but these aren't one of them.

    • @decold7768
      @decold7768 11 місяців тому +1

      rockets get intercepted by trophy aps

    • @dianapennepacker6854
      @dianapennepacker6854 10 місяців тому +4

      Stop thinking shells hitting tanks are like video games. There is no HP.
      For one... RPGs and other similar weapons don't richochet for one. They hit the tank then shoot a large jet of molten metal inside causing damage, and killing the crew. (There is also metal fragments caused by the jets).
      So it would just damage one of the AUTOMATED turrets.
      A anti tank sabot from an other MBT will basically do the same.
      In order to kill the tank you need to hit something vulnerable. Meaning either you kill the crew inside, catch the inside on fire, or hit the ammo. Even then if isn't a sure kill which is why you see videos of Tanks getting hit multiple times until it is clear... Like Russian MBTs turrets using their turrets ejection system.
      So unless they really, and I mean really, shit the bed on those turrets designs? They will be fine.
      Hell it is just an other thing for a top down munition to need to get through so maybe it will decrease the chance of the crew getting killed.
      Don't know why three guns is required. That leaves less ammo for everything. I'd take the bigger calibers, to make it less complicated.

    • @simonbrown7455
      @simonbrown7455 9 місяців тому

      I think mini automated turrets will become more popular. I can see them being used as drone defence and general suppression.

  • @marcpelta4055
    @marcpelta4055 Рік тому +3

    Still way too heavy. They’re not utilizing cutting or next gen tech for Armour

    • @tomendruweit9386
      @tomendruweit9386 8 місяців тому

      they likley are and using that wheight for other stuff. wetsern tanks are often very heavy due to doktrine

  • @Tiger3000dk
    @Tiger3000dk 5 днів тому

    It Could Probably Shoot Down A UAV...

  • @mikeking7470
    @mikeking7470 Рік тому +2

    I thought tank design had FINALLY done away with all those extra turrets and extra weight. Those things are just shot traps and weak points in the armor. Most of the video shows a different turret without all that junk.

    • @pablor5628
      @pablor5628 Рік тому +1

      not really, all these turrets add 360 degree awareness, it really isn't that much of a problem

    • @tomendruweit9386
      @tomendruweit9386 8 місяців тому +1

      shoot traps havent beena thing since the development of sabot ammunition. and i they are mounted on top of the turret so not really a weakpoint armor wise as an extra turret on ww1 and pre ww2 tanks used to be.
      I think they are very necessary to combat drones and slow moving rockets espetially the 30mm on the roof. Propably also usefull in the more and more infantry and city based combat we see today.

    • @remistiegler5302
      @remistiegler5302 8 місяців тому

      The other tank you saw on the video is the beta-version - literally a Leo2 Chassis with a Leclerc turret. And I personnaly like the idea of getting extra situational awareness with an unmanned turret instead of a man outside behind its machinegun. Plus the 30mm turret with fragmentation AA ammo is vital against drones. Loitering drones would be destroyed before reaching the tank

  • @davidblass9808
    @davidblass9808 7 місяців тому

    homeboi

  • @allenliu8820
    @allenliu8820 6 місяців тому +2

    The EMBT looks like the french shut the germans outside and decided to make everything using french parts. Looking at the tank, the main gun looks french and the hull looks to be a modified leclerc hull. Also considering KMW and Rheinmetall are joint owned, I believe that this project while funded by both nations was entirely lead by france and weren't able to compromise on much of the design. While a KMW engine was used, they stuck with a french made cannon, french made machine guns, and french made hull. Everything visible to the average viewer can see that this partnership failed in producing a tank that was for both nations.

    • @hermes6910
      @hermes6910 6 місяців тому

      Except that most of what you say is wrong for some reasons, like the hull which is designed and manufactured by KMW.
      The turret is designed by both Nexter and KMW under the name KNDS.
      The gun is "French" (which no longer makes sense as KNDS is both German and French) because Nexter had a gun, KMW did not and Rheinmetall is not part of this programme.

    • @allenliu8820
      @allenliu8820 6 місяців тому

      @@hermes6910 I am only pointing out the aesthetics of the tank because it looks very french. The hull looks very similar to the french leclerc hull and obviously Nexter had the gun because it is the same one mounted on the leclerc tank. The hull to me looks like an upgraded leclerc hull which is designed by nexter, which made me believe that KMW was not very involved during the design phase because they could had easily used the same hull on the leopard 2 which KMW produces, but they chose not to.
      I also believed Rheinmetall to be part of the project because I read a while back there were talks about merging both companies and only recently I found out that it fell through.

    • @hermes6910
      @hermes6910 6 місяців тому

      @@allenliu8820 "KMW was not very involved during the design phase because they could had easily used the same hull on the leopard 2 which KMW produces, but they chose not to. "
      Guy... that's literally what they did in the first version of the EMBT... Nothing more than a Leo 2 hull and a Leclerc turret... (Also the hull is still derived from the Leo2... nothing from the Leclerc)
      So yes, KMW or (KMW from KNDS) is very involved in the project with Nexter from KNDS because this project serves as a cement for KNDS so that Nexter and KMW work together on their strong point.

    • @allenliu8820
      @allenliu8820 6 місяців тому

      @@hermes6910 I do not know about the first version of the EMBT and like I said I am looking at the tank aesthetically and most of it was just speculations. Either way, chances are this tank is not going to be in service any time soon/ Hopefully we will see both nations look into the EMBT and the KF 51 for their NGCS program, but we'll see how this goes.

    • @hermes6910
      @hermes6910 6 місяців тому

      @@allenliu8820 The EMBT was not intended to be commissioned from the outset.
      The project has simply aroused growing interest.
      The main objective of the EMBT is to create joint work within KNDS to ensure synergy in the MGCS program.
      As for the KF51, there's nothing really interesting about it - it's just a platform to sell Rheinmetall's 130s, which didn't liked being pushed to the side by KNDS.
      Rheinmetall is now threatening the entire MGCS programme by breaking stability.
      The MGCS is not only a MBT, it's more than just a platform, it's a global ground program including the new generation MBT.

  • @kazimkorkmaz
    @kazimkorkmaz 3 місяці тому

    Was nützt dieser Panzer ohne aktives Schutzsystem?
    What good is this tank without an active protection system?
    Only the AKKOR (active protection system) system designed for the Turks' Altay 2 tank works super smoothly.

  • @dumpsterchild5734
    @dumpsterchild5734 6 місяців тому

    Oh yes to be honest that does look awesome that looks now makes me want to buy this over the Russian models😂😂😂😂 oh yeah I mean I would buy this over damn freaking Ferrari or better than the Bugatti or Tesla

  • @CD-mv6ct
    @CD-mv6ct 6 місяців тому +2

    $300 drone>this tank

    • @Theinitedstatesofamerics12345
      @Theinitedstatesofamerics12345 6 місяців тому

      Anything above a bb gun>300$ drone

    • @victor6814
      @victor6814 6 місяців тому

      No, it’s equiped with close air detection sytems coupled with ARX30mm anti drone turett

  • @manlede
    @manlede 6 місяців тому +1

    Que lo envíen a Ucrania allá los rusos le harán un test bien riguroso.

  • @nordlandak6853
    @nordlandak6853 6 місяців тому

    Ready by 2041 when it will become obsolete!

  • @user-mg8hi4oz5y
    @user-mg8hi4oz5y 8 місяців тому

    Kind of similar to the Object 477 don't ya think?

  • @charliecharliecharliecharl8554

    Very weird looking turret setup is this ment to be a main battle tank

    • @tomendruweit9386
      @tomendruweit9386 8 місяців тому

      its new tahst for sure, maybe a bit like the leclerc. i do preffer the Panther turret though.

    • @charliecharliecharliecharl8554
      @charliecharliecharliecharl8554 8 місяців тому +1

      @tomendruweit9386 what's been happening in Ukraine and the beautiful angled Israel tank For horizontal attacks to deflect blown up by drones all new tanks need maybe remote 50bmp anti aircraft drone gun and top armour

  • @johncherskov5755
    @johncherskov5755 6 місяців тому

    No matter what it has, if you can't remote control the tank, and it needs 4 man crew, then it's not the future. I don't see any top armor innovations either.

  • @chrissenefili4971
    @chrissenefili4971 6 місяців тому +1

    German build things really good and in good quality.

  • @SlavaUkraini6987
    @SlavaUkraini6987 6 місяців тому

    Love to see a new modern version of the Tiger🪖

  • @frantisekvincze534
    @frantisekvincze534 6 місяців тому

    👌👌👍👍🙋‍♂️🙋‍♂️🇩🇪🇩🇪🇪🇺🇪🇺🇸🇰🇸🇰

  • @MuntherElIraqi
    @MuntherElIraqi 6 місяців тому

    you said its provided with TROPHY , same as Merkava in Gaza !!

  • @yadamsurensh4003
    @yadamsurensh4003 6 місяців тому

    Looks like Armata T14 from Russia

  • @user-kh7er8yf8k
    @user-kh7er8yf8k 6 місяців тому

    Воды налили , да и весь ролик похож на мультик в стиле притчи ...)

  • @myhappylive5125
    @myhappylive5125 6 місяців тому +1

    ❤😂🎉😢😮😅

  • @pauillacwine263
    @pauillacwine263 Рік тому +9

    120 ain't going to cut it. Need that new Rheinmetall RH-130 L51 smoothbore to blow those Russian asses to smithereens. For now I'd put my money on the KF51 Panther.

    • @wifi_soldier5076
      @wifi_soldier5076 Рік тому +1

      An upgrade will likely come in the next version. There have already been two versions on the embt 2017 and 2022. The problem is they can't decide between the RH-130 L51 or the French GIAT 140mm.

    • @Future183
      @Future183 Рік тому +2

      @@wifi_soldier5076 Yeah thats because the 140 mm only has a slithly advantage and isnt really better then the 130 mm. Meanwhile the 130mm makes more sense since it Safes space, weight and you can carry more.

    • @hugoduigou7703
      @hugoduigou7703 Рік тому +2

      @@Future183 in reality the 140mm is not much heavier and is not really bulkier than the 130mm it is quite similar. In addition, superior firepower could be useful if new armor technologies were invented on the tank of enemy countries.

    • @Future183
      @Future183 Рік тому +2

      @@hugoduigou7703 actually yes the french 140mm is heavier and also a lot bigger. Also the shells need a lot of space, so you cant carry that much and you need an autoloader, meanwhile the 130mm has autoloader too but can also be hand loaded, while the 140mm ammo would be too heavy to carry for a human. And only 20% more firepower isnt really an argument against all the other facts...
      The germans also made a 140mm back in the 80s on an Leopard 2 prototype wich was a LOT better then the 120mm. The germans could easily make 140mm gun superior to the 130mm and french 140mm but the 130mm is more practical and has more advantages.

    • @DragonsilverXGenesis
      @DragonsilverXGenesis Рік тому

      @@Future183 Atm both french 130mm and 140mm are better than german that's why they only do the hull. The Leclerc main problem was this one and a lack of armor but tbh France don't use MBT alone like dumb RU/USA, they use it with a lot of drones and covered with artillery

  • @reco3406
    @reco3406 11 місяців тому +1

    Turkiye 4 tip tank yapiyor 1 . Yeni altay , daha sonra gelismisleri yolda

  • @user-ol1qm9ey7g
    @user-ol1qm9ey7g 6 місяців тому

    รถถังมันถึงยุคสุดท้ายแล้วล่ะแต่ฉันก็ประทับใจรถถังบางรุ่นยังคอมมานโดสปริงเลนส์รถถังเบารุ่นเดียวในโลกฉันอยากจะออกแบบป้อมปืนใหม่มันสวยงามมากรูปทรงมันก็คล้ายกัน

  • @Zx17OPv57i
    @Zx17OPv57i Рік тому

    its maybe good tech but disgusting look and feel weak with no armor on turret

  • @simplyyellow6240
    @simplyyellow6240 6 місяців тому

    Lancet be like 🤤

  • @Procrastinater
    @Procrastinater 6 місяців тому

    Looks like it would stop functioning if it was peppered with autocannon fire. It has a whole damn basement dweller's entire battlestation was taped to the front of the thing. It can have all the awesome future tech you want, if they instantly get broken then what is it worth? Gonna send it back for repairs every time one of its 20 sensors breaks down?

  • @lonniesides9302
    @lonniesides9302 5 місяців тому

    Lancet bait.

  • @M60gunner1971
    @M60gunner1971 6 місяців тому

    Too many shot traps. 😢

  • @ordnance7222
    @ordnance7222 6 місяців тому

    So, we going to give this to the Russians as well.

  • @fritzlakritz3350
    @fritzlakritz3350 Рік тому +2

    Seems after nerfing the t14 the Meta shifting towards more usefull Tanks like KF51 Panther , Abrams 1.5, the embt and the kt2 black panther. But the embt looks a bit weaker, maybe more for expierenced players, players who like the Challenge of being confronted by a technical malefunction during combat. In my opinion its the weakest s tier tank. A victim of its time. After t14 aramata dominated the Meta for a long time, the developer became bored with new tank Designs, and did just reskined the t14, put a smaller tower on the main Tower, ading some optics. Increased stats increased costs. not very gold efficient. While being almost a copy of the t14 armata, patchnotes hit the embt really hard. Not a really good meta pick right now. Low B tier after being nerfed. Players who dont want to grind up for a new tank and would like to wait and see how the meta evolves, they should check out the new drone operator class added in the newest patch. We will see us on the battlefield. gl and hf

  • @ninny65
    @ninny65 3 місяці тому

    Is this an april fools joke

    • @Siranoxz
      @Siranoxz 3 місяці тому

      No its not.

    • @ninny65
      @ninny65 3 місяці тому

      @@Siranoxz

  • @mark_dauz
    @mark_dauz 4 місяці тому

    Too much "thing" in tank turret

  • @lukaszslowakiewicz9395
    @lukaszslowakiewicz9395 6 місяців тому

    All fine and dandy but when the Russian move into the Baltic states we gonna need more of today tanks (that France and Germany are not producing anymore) not some fancy toys.

  • @1Tosya
    @1Tosya 6 місяців тому

    Хорошая мишень ))!