It is a occupation. The fact that Isreal consistently denies this is absurd. To claim a land that your ancestors vacated hundreds of years earlier as your birth right is completely ridiculous. To use an analogy, think of it as if your great, great, great, great grandfather sold a 100 acre farm long ago. Do you genuinly believe you have a right to just show up and build a house, put in fencing around the present owners home and claim it as your own?? There is nothing antisemitic about calling out the Israeli state or Jewish government just like you would ANY occupying people. Unfortunately, antisemitism is cited immediately when ANY legitimate critique is made...and there are many.
Except the land was never sold, it was stolen from the Israelites - 1/12th of which are the Jewish people who live today. 11 more tribes are expected to live in the land when Moshiach arrives so you better get used to seeing the Holy Land inhabited by its proper owners
The Israeli regime’s illegal settlement activities go on in al-Quds, Maliki said, and urged due confrontation against this policy on the part of Tel Aviv. He called Iraq “Palestine’s loyal friend and supporter,” saying he was paying the visit to the Iraqi capital so the two sides could coordinate their political stances. Hussein, for his part, urged the importance of continued unity among the ranks of the Palestinians, saying the recent victory in Gaza had to be deployed towards political gains. He also assured Maliki that the Iraqi society sustained its support for the Palestinian cause of liberation from Israeli occupation and aggression.
@@dcrafton3988 I´m an israeli living aboard, and people I know disliked the song because they just didn´t like it, I didn´t hear anybody actually speak about antisemetism.
Love that strawmanning, not to mention that mixing in religious “history” and actual history, framing crimes against Palestinians much more softly. Now even if all of the stuff that was said is true you DON’T just get to say “hey they lived here thousands of years ago so GTFO”, if that was the case hen every indigenous population whether in Canada, US or Australia would be able to take ownership of their respective countries without question. Additionally, love that there is a complete lack of mention that the Israeli government funded Hamas so that it would break up the more secular movement by the PLO. The constant bad faith framing here is a pretty good indicator of whether you’ll propaganda or not.
That isn't a straw man at all, you are the one making the straw men, not only that Cherry picking, false comparison/equivalence, and appeal to authority
Pretty sure 99% of Israelis know Hamas was the creation of Israel but them acknowledging that is them giving up a major victim card and that's a big no no for Jews.
In fact they didn't say "hey we lived here thousands of years ago so GTFO". They bought parts of those lands to Arab landlords, then the rest of their lands were given by the UN resolution 181 after the tragedy of the Holocaust and the rest of the lands were conquered through wars of defence (maybe except the 6 days war).
they never told palestinians to leave. if the six day war hadn't happened then palestinians wouldn't be displaced. also israel never funded hamas that is a ridiculous claim lmfao
@@staC-wh6ik Except in today's world through international law, a nation cannot expand its territories through conquest. That goes for many countries as well not just Israel though
The Supreme Court of Israel is a Leftist CostraNostra that is staffed by self-hating, degenerate cultural Marxist Judges. When each elderly Judge retires, they bring in a fresh far lefty Judge to take its place. The problem will be solved when the Likud wins the elections - hopefully on Nov 1st.
Occupying a Territory like the United States did, and then recognize the people who lived in that territory as equal does not exonerate the United States from being an occupier. you can’t just walk in someone’s home take it from him and say “no it’s your home as well but it’s mine too”. Do United States belong to the Indians, not you. Free the Indians!!! You evil occupier!!
Anna Che your ignorance is so passe. Seriously? What would you say to somebody they're just decided to live in your house which you haven't lived in because you came to another country but it's still your house and they've been squatting there for 15 years and all of a sudden they say it's their house. Well that's the israeli-palestinian conflict and situation okay the land always belongs to Israel.
Obviously you know nothing about history because the kingdom other under King David and King Solomon. Would include parts of Lebanon parts of Syria and most of Jordan okay so what are you talking about Jordan never existed till after world war One did you know that the ruler of Jordan was actually a Saudi Arabian.
It’s weird to claim any ethnic group has or doesn’t have the right to any particular piece of land. People seem to ignore the fundamentally racist nature of this entire conflict.
@@shainazion4073 natives had it waaay worse no one feels bad as crimes against humanity is being led by who again? Who uses gas and white phosphorus? Who implements apartheid again??? Who kicks ppl out their homes??? Jews are black not who occupy there. They have stolen lands and identity and it’s not hard to see for yourself with just a little bit of research
Considering that the Muslims who didn't flee their homes in 1948 and their descendants are equal citizens with representation in all aspects of Israeli professions and daily life, your label of 'racist' does not apply. If you want to apply that label to how the Palestinians were treated, apply it to the Arab countries whose false promises left a group of people homeless. Why aren't you asking why those countries didn't absorb those who fled? Then ask about what happened to the property of the approximate 850,000 Jews kicked out of Arab countries. If you're concerned with righting what you perceive as wrong, where's your outcry for that gross injustice???
Or you just realized how one sided this conflict is and can't admit you are wrong, because what they are telling is only facts, there is only one history for this place. Btw it's pretty hypocritical saying that since the ones using propaganda all the time are the palestinians and the BDS movement.
Can you point out anything that isn’t true, and where they have left out part of the narrative? It is rare to see this level of historical detail. Israel is always painted as a Pantomime villain, without any context. I believe the truth is far more complex.
It sad you are fighting the real owners of the land since antiquities however the owners are so civil to live with you except you have to abhor terrorism or religious intolerance and killing or maiming anybody look at them contented to pray beside their holy wall given the fact they have the wall it means they are the original owners of the wall surroundings or the area itself the misled with religious conflict in the beginning whe you look at it the original owners faith was founded so many centuries ago while your religion was not even known so sooner ,don't be naive the fact that area was captured in a war it means they own the land already like those landgrabber nations today absurd as their own nobody protested except to listen of truth and listening to reason
I understand the need to condense tons of stuff into 8 minutes, but this video misses a lot of crucial information, whereas it gives too much attention to an individual's opinion. One who watches this without knowing the full story, might think that Israel just bursted into a place that has not been theirs for thousands of years. What about the UN's Partition Plan for Palestine (1947) that gave both Israel and Palestine the full legitimate right to exist in the area, and defined the borders between the two? What about the war that the Arab world launched upon Israel soon after, as part of which Israel has legally obtained the other side's land? You cannot start a war, lose it, and then call the winner an "ocuupying power", if you did, absolutely no country in the world as of today had any legitimacy over its borders, or existence.
@@MrClosetSpider Look, I have a rather scientific outlook on life, and I believe that there is one truth to everything. Whether France (for example) has legitimacy over its land or not is a simple yes/no answer. And if Spain (for example) thinks differently, they should prove it. The same goes for anyone who claims that Israel must "close down" becuase it has no legitimacy. Prove it. For now, all I hear is "Free Gaza" calls whereas it had already been 100% freed in 2005.
The Arabs who stayed in Israel have a peaceful life, enjoy the democracy and Constitutional Rights of all Israeli citizens, right along with the Arab Muslims, Bedouin Muslims (some IDF), Arab Christians (some also IDF), Christians, Arabs generally, B'Hai Faith, Druze (have sworn to fight to the end for the land) religious Jews, atheist Jews, Ethiopian Jews, all living together in peace, vs. Hamas territory. Everyone is represented in the Knesset, but the ones who left? Well, they haven't ever been free under their leaders. Hamas are terrorists regardless of anything else--why is that so difficult to see? Queers for Palestine---unbelievable & self dangerous ignorance perpetuated, because.....Jews? We are 0.2% of the world's population, on land formerly known as Judea ("Jew")-Samaria, approximately the size of New Jersey, while the surrounding Muslim countries sit on the entire rest of the region. Most Arabs have Jewish dna, African, and no small amount of European because of migratory patterns. European dna--are they then the rightful people of European land? The so called "palestinians" have lots of dna represented from many, many regions. Stand by America and Europe you are just as despised. Islam--started in 7th Century CE is the late comer on this scene, coming after both Judaism, about 3500 years old (1500 BCE) and Christianity 2000 years. Though Islam claims our Prophets as their own, Mohammed was born @ 560 CE. So, who got there first?
Another little tidbit is the origin of the name Palestine. It came after 70 AD when the Roman Empire destroyed the second temple and Israel. They renamed the region from Judah to Palestine. The word Palestine is based on the name of the Phillistines as a way on mocking them.
Are you ignorant as hell?? The term Pe-le-set has been recognized even by the ancient Egyptians more than 4000 years ago. This means the term has existed for even longer than that.
@@hassanjamal4212 Bruh you are factually incorrect. The name change came about in the 2nd century AD , when the Romans crushed the revolt of Shimon Bar Kokhba 132 AD, during which Jerusalem and Judea were regained and the area of Judea was renamed Palaestina.
It is a common and widely spread misconception that Israel's 1948 Declaration of Independence was predicated on the 1947 General Assembly Partition Resolution 181(II). This belief is not factually accurate. The resolution was not adopted under Chapter 7 of the United Nations Charter and, consequently, did not possess legally binding force. Moreover, the resolution's outright rejection by the Arab League rendered it effectively null and void. The establishment of the State of Israel was fundamentally based on the universal principle of international law known as 'uti possidetis juris.' This principle dictates that newly-formed sovereign states should inherit the internal borders of their preceding sovereign entities. In Israel's case, this included the borders of the British Mandate for Palestine, partially encompassing the Gaza Strip, the City of Jerusalem, and the West Bank. Therefore, upon adopting its Declaration of Independence, the State of Israel legitimately acquired title over these territories. Another fundamental principle relevant to the creation of the State of Israel is the equal applicability of law. It is necessary to recognize that the legal principle 'uti possidetis juris' originating in Roman Law, has been applied multiple times over the past two centuries, providing a legal foundation for the creation of various state entities, including Syria, Jordan, and Lebanon. Consequently, denying Israel its rightful status based on the 'uti possidetis juris' principle could jeopardize the statehood and legitimacy of many United Nations member states. No international legal entity would permit such a precedent. As a result of the belligerent and illegal invasion by Arab forces in 1948, the Gaza Strip, West Bank, and East Jerusalem were occupied by Egypt and Jordan. This occupation led to the ethnic cleansing of the Jewish population and the desecration or destruction of Jewish cemeteries and synagogues. During the 1967 war, instigated by Egypt and Jordan, Israel reclaimed these territories and reinstated its rightful ownership upon them. Contrary to widely regurgitated assertions, the movement of 700,000 Israelis to Judaea and Samaria (aka West Bank) was not a result of governmental relocation efforts. This is a crucial consideration in the context of Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which pertains to the deportation or transfer of populations. It is widely acknowledged that these individuals were driven by their personal ideologies and religious beliefs, choosing to settle in these regions of their own volition. Indeed, many Jews from various countries have pursued their aspiration to establish a Jewish presence in areas of historical and religious significance, such as Judea and Samaria, commonly referred to as the West Bank. Consequently, labeling these individuals as 'illegal occupiers' or 'colonizers,' and suggesting that the Israeli government 'forced' them into these areas, is a profound mischaracterization of the situation. Such descriptions fail to recognize the autonomous decision-making and personal motivations that underlie their settlement in these regions. Let me recap. 1. Israel is rightful owner of all lands and territories of former British Mandate of Palestine. 2. Israel has been wrongly and maliciously accused of being an occupying power from the moment of its inception. 3. 700,000 Israeli villagers have perfect legal foundation to reside in West Bank.
It is ridiculously simple. In international law, for land to be 'occupied' its sovereignty must have been usurped. Obviously, there has never been Palestinian sovereignty anywhere. Thus, there is no 'occupation' anywhere. The Palestinians claim land they WANT is occupied, but wanting land is not sovereignty. All of this, of course, ignores the Oslo Accords, in which the PLO, the sole representative of the Palestinian people, agreed to Israeli control of Area C. Everyone studiously ignores the Accords, which they have to do in order to claim there is an occupation. As long as the international community colludes in the myth of 'occupied Palestinian land', the Palestinians will remain locked in their self-imposed victimhood. There is no Palestinian land west of the River Jordan. The Palestinian land is all to the east, and it is called Jordan. King Hussein of Jordan himself said "Jordan is Palestine and Palestine is Jordan".
This video showing up on my feed as a sponsored video def made me think something fishy was going on and after watching my presumption was correct. The fact this video only brings on a Israeli woman’s pov and fails to consider the Palestinian pov shows the bias in this video even though they go to lengths to make it seem like their is some understanding. Lots is facts and talking points missing from this video to make Israel seem like they have done no wrong doing.
What's a Palestinian? Oh yeah...... the fake people the psy-op created by the KGB and PLO to create an ancient people *in 1964* as an indigenous people that are made up mostly by Muslim refugees, as well as Arab laborers most coming to the land in the late 1800s, early 1900s.
As an Israeli i can tell you that if any video claims to explain the context of the Israeli Palestinian conflict in 8 minutes, you can safely assume it's going to be missing most of the relevant facts... You can't cram 100 years of war into 8 minutes no matter how biased or objective you try to be...
I don't know who needs to hear this, but the definition of zionism isn't "what ever the Israeli govement does", it means the self determination of the Jewish people. It doesn't inherently exclude other people's self determination or rights. OK, now I am going to bed, have a nice day
@Waleed The displacement or refugee crisis was a result of war between the fledgling state of Israel and the combined Arab Armies in 1948. It was tragic for the Arabs. Jews were ethnically cleansed from Hebron and East Jerusalem when Jordan captured the West Bank. They destroyed more than 50 synagogues. After 1948, about 850 thousand Jews were expelled or forced to flee from the Arab countries - the Middle East and North Africa. Jews were living in those lands for many centuries. Majority went to Israel. The Palestinian Arab refugees and their descendants in Arab countries were never granted to become citizens. The Arabs who remain in Israel were given full and equal rights. While Israeli Arabs only constitutes 20% of the population, 30% of doctors and 35% of pharmacists in Israel were Arabs. The Druze people and some Arabs serves in the army and plays an active role in Israeli society. 1967, Israel launched a preemptive strike when Egypt sent forces to the border and close the straits of Tiran in the Red Sea. Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza, Sinai and the Golan Heights. Israel offered to bring back the territories in exchange for peace. The Arab league refused to accept the offer. In 1979, Egypt and Israel signed a peace agreement and the Sinai was handed back to Egypt.
@Waleed israel wont allow mass return of muslims to israel because israel isnt suicidal.we aint gonna allow in millions of people who see us as enemies,who were engaed in armed conflicts against us till few years ago and that still hold a grudge against us.india aint gonna allow millions of muslims from pakistan in,pakistan wont allow millions from india in,european countries wont allow millions of muslims back in and dont intend to be the first country to commit voluntary suicide by allowing the country to gain instantaneous muslim majority...
For whatever reason Israel has the right to,exist like any other country has. They have always had to fight to exist. So enjoy what you have for real estate. This Palestine problem gone on long enough. Palestine also has a right to govern itself also. They will destroy each other eventually and Hamas is not helping this fight.
Prophet Abraham was NOT a JEW he was an ARAB IRAQI from the town called UR south of IRAQ near euphrates river ziggurat and all his descendents were arabic people and prophet of God
Abraham was an Aramean, not an Arab. The Arabs invaded Iraq to spread Islam after the 700s. The Arameans were Levantines, not Arabs! They were a Semetic people, not speaking Arabic, but Aramaic or Akkadian.
You want the land but not the people, that’s why you’re stuck where you are. If you dare, just annex the west bank already! Oh, you can’t do that, because that means you need to give citizenship to 4 million palestinians
@@ilyasmusa4196 Believe me the Arabs there pray to god to be part of Israel instead of part of the Palestinian Authority. When Netanyahu said he will give back the PA some Israeli villages the Israeli Arabs started demonstrating against it
@@petarjovanovic1481 you've visited South Africa to see apartheid/post apartheid policies first-hand to arrive that your " monumental ( with emphasis on mental ) opinion I presume ?
@@petarjovanovic1481 it's OBVIOUS that your trash talk opinion is based on left wing media and BDS handouts - in truth , you are AFRAID of visiting Israel to see the truth first hand , lest your " glorious" ideals are crushed in front of your eyes
Even if we don't call israel an occupying power for occupying west bank. It's still an occupying power for golan heights. Syria borders are well defined and was part of French colony and not Britain so israel is definitely an occupying regime
@@Abilliph there are still many druze arabs living there although Israel has given them citizenship they are still Syrians and in the eyes of international communities the golan heights belongs to syria
Israel is entitled in law to occupy the Golan. Syria invaded Israel in 1973. That war is ongoing, which means in law Israel may hold the Golan until Syria makes peace, which is unlikely ever to happen.
Who cares?, They described occupation in a peaceful way and if Palestinians fight back they call them ‘Terrorists’, Israel raped their lands killed their children and still thursty for making Israel the ruler of the whole country.
@@fanOmry "if we're oppressing you then how are still alive?" Such a dumb talking point but what else can I expect from a channel who's audience is pro Israel
@@fanOmry Israel isn't committing a "genocide" per se, that's China obviously. But Israel is committing either a violent occupation at best or apartheid at worst.
@@willisswenson3843 DYOR, but yes. They - Israel, funded them to get them up & started. I'm not saying that they are CURRENTLY funding them but it's well known that Israel helped in the beginning.
When this channel has a problematic topic to discuss, they bring in some nice young woman with some childish narrative and a "personal story" as if an anecdote may explain amything. Anyway... beating round the bush for 8 min, pretty useless clip, just a contribution to the propaganda war which we, normal people, should stay away from as much as we can.
Lol you only assume its beating around the bush because you have an agenda. The point of staying unbiased means you have to also accept other points as possibly right. As for propoganda, almost everything can be precived as propoganda, especially on social media.
The US withdrawal from Afghanistan bears striking similarities to Washingtons 1975 pullout of Vietnam and Israels retreat from Southern Lebanon in the year 2000. Many have concluded that this is another sign of the decline of the US and possibly its allies like Israel. After all, the US could not even execute an evacuation from Afghans capital Kabul, requiring the Pentagon to give briefings to the world, seen as damage control. What lessons can the West learn from the outcome of Americas longest war?
This video didn't provide the context I was looking for and what is probably the most crucial question in the matter: is the israeli population a willing, culturally and or ethnicly distinct group who embraced soveregnity, or is Israel forced on the native population by some outside invading force? As far as I know the continuity of a Jewish power is far from intact historically, whatever language the dirt is speaking according to the claims of the "culture of the land".
The facts are easy to follow. Whether Israeli people or Jews were here before or not has only historical context. ▪︎The land was the Ottoman Empire's land, they signed it over to the Allies after WW1. The Allies turned the responsibility of the land over to the League of Nations. ▪︎ The League of Nations created 3 Mandates to start new countries, and they assigned the rest of the Ottoman lands to existing countries. ▪︎ Three Mandates were created, the Mandate of Mesopotamia (Iraq), the Mandate of Syria and Lebanon, and the Mandate of Palestine. ▪︎ The Mandates were under the temporary administration of an Allied power until the countries could develop a stable government. ▪︎ At the San Remo conference and the Paris Peace Conference it was decided that a Jewish state would ve reestablished in the Area of Palestine. A unanimous vote (all 51 states of the League of Nations in July 1922) voted this into law. ▪︎ The Mandate of Palestine had one mission only, to reestablish the Jewish homeland in the Area of Palestine. ▪︎ The British gave 77% of the land to the Hashemites to become trans-Jordan, leaving only 23% of the land to become the Jewish homeland. ▪︎ The British illegally offered the Arabs 80% of the land that was left (23%) as a state in 1937, Peel Commission. The Arabs turned it down because they didn't want the Jews to even have the 20% left ( 4.5% of the original Mandate lands) ▪︎The Jewish Agency became the defacto government ss per the Charter of the Mandate of Palestine. The Arabs were causing riots and massacres. The Arabs never created a government, the Arab factions refused to go to any seminars or conferences to discuss the future of the land, as the Jews were also invited. ▪︎ All the other Mandates were turned over to the Arab governments, the British refused to turn the land over. The British Mandate was ending, the British turned the Responsibility over to the newly formed United Nations. ▪︎ The United Nations suggested in Resolution 181, the Partition Plan, to create 2 states, an Arab state and a Jewish state. The Arabs again said no, the Jews created a Jewish state based on the borders suggested by the UN. It was announced on May 14, 1948 as the British Mandate officially ended. ▪︎ Within 24 Hours, 5 Arab countries attacked the one day old country, Israel. Read the Charter of the British Mandate, it was established to create a Jewish country to reestablish the Jewish homeland based on their historic ties to the country.
@@shainazion4073 Thank you very much for taking the time to write all this down. This may provide a lead to get a deeper understanding of the situation over there.
@@Vagolyk I'm glad it gave you some background information. The idea of a Jewish homeland, was never to only have Jews there, the Arab people were never in any of the plans or actions to be forced out of the land. After the Partition plan was announced, many of the Arab inhabitants left for areas that would not be under Jewish control in the plan. The Arabs who stayed are full citizens of Israel with the same rights and benefits as all citizens.
The answer to the question is that nobody has claim to the land in that sense. What this question that you asked in the context of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict is if either side has the right to commit genocide against the other. The answer to that being that both sides will only ever have equal right to genocide the other. This war has never been about colonization, it has always been about religion and Islamic attitudes towards Judaism. In this sense Israel has at worst as strong a claim to the land as Palestine. So in that sense any argument of governmental legitimacy comes from which government would better be able/willing to guarantee the rights to life liberty and property. In this sense the Israeli government is only more legitimate relative to the Palestine government.
In the West Bank, Israel is by definition considered to be an occupying power. It has even acknowledged this much in arrangements with the PA, devolving certain responsibilities of occupying powers laid out in treaties of which Israel is party to the PA (including the very treaties you laid out in this video). Just look at the debacle over Israel's responsibility or lack there of to vaccinate Palestinians. The argument the Israeli government made was that they had devolved those powers, not that they weren't an occupying power under international law. Whether it is "occupying" the 67 and 48 integral areas is another thing entirely...
@Ploni Almoni According to the UN, occupying the State of Palestine - which is an observer state; more states also recognize the "State of Palestine" than Kosovo. I don't particularly support Palestine, but it is what it is. Israel is certainly not considered to legally be an occupying power in the 48 lands by anyone. That is just anti-Israel propaganda and Arab nationalism leaking into modern leftism.
This is utterly misleading, jewish people alnog with muslims and christians were living in peace in Palestine before this zionism movement which wanted All the land to only one group and discriminate all other groups, imposing all kinds of oppression and power. They wanted a jewish state in all Palestine from day one, not after the six day war. Arabs stood against discrimination of the palestinian arabs. What if you live in a place where you and your ancestors live for thousands of yeras, and suddenly a large group of people born every where in the world come at once and say get out of this land, it's ours, we were there some thousands years ago, oh and you wob't have a place or a nationality of your own and if you refused and start defending your home so every media outlet in the west will call you a terrorist. If this is not an occupation, what is?
The video also spoke about the jewish historical places in palestine not mentioning the third most holly mosque in Islam is also there and the Qyama church which is also there. The video mislead the viewer of thinking the land is historically only to one group which is the jews, where it belongs to all the 3. Only one decided to take it all over by FORCE and killings, and you see an occupation is not a suitable word!??!!!
No, there was not peace for Jews under the Ottomans, or in other Muslim lands. The Jews were discriminated against and forced to live as second class citizens or worse. The Arabs were appealed to by the Jews to stay in their houses and help them create a country together. The Arabs answered by having 5 Arab armies attack the one day old country of Israel. The British gave away 77% of "Palestine" to the Hashemites before there was even an Israel. There was no one Palestinian people. In 1922, the British Census had over 30 languages spoken by the Arabs in the land. There were all different languages, religions, ethnicities, cultures, nationalities. There were; Muslims, Christians, Druze, Samaritans, Bahai, Mandeans, Orthodox, Shiites, Salafis, Sunnis, Syrians, Circassians, Chechins, Bosniaks, Kurds, Turks, Berbers, Slavs, Greeks, Georgians, Persians, Tartars, Ashiri, Mongols, Sudanese, Armenians, Maronites, Lebanese, Egyptians, Jordanians and more. Which one of these were the Palestinian people? Who was their leader? Who was to have made decisions for these people?
@@ahmedessam5804 There is no Holy mosque in Israel. The al Aqsa mosque was not built until 70 years after Muhammed's death. There was no Muslims in Jerusalem during Muhammed's lifetime. Muhammed never came to Jerusalem ever in his life. The Real al Aqsa mosque was in Ji'irrana, Saudi Arabia near Taif. The Umayyads named the mosque after the passage in the Quran in order to make Jerusalem into an important place for Muslims. It was not.
True children of Abraham they are palestian people who were jewish and converted to Islam and the zionist jews they are NOT children of Abraham they are children of japheth european people who were statue worshipers idols worshipers and converted to jewdaim and now claim the holy land palestian
Go back to home to russia and poland and ukraine bulgaria and hungria and france and germany and holland and sweden and not the holy land palestine 🤲🕋🕯️🙏📿🕊️☮️
@@marienovak3663 A Zionist is a Political movement, not an ethnicity! Prophet Moses was the first Zionist, working to get his people to Zion. 70% of Jews and 82% of "Palestinians" with roots in that land have the same Y-chromosomes, meaning they come from the same ancient core population.
@@marienovak3663Eighty percent of Israeli Jews are Sabras, Sixty percent of Israeli Jews are Mizrahi Jews forced out of the Arab Muslim countries because Israel became a state! Jews from Egypt, Iraq, Iran, Algeria, Morocco, Lebanon, Syria and other places. Start recognizing facts!!
@@daboss6614 how israel treats palestinians isn't even close to how the nazis treated the jews. I'm not a jew, i'm arab and us israeli arabs live in a much better circumstances than arabs in arab country so thankgod it's israel here not falestine. Unless you were born and raised there (israel/palestine) please don't talk cuz you're not gonna make a good point trust me
@@deegytf6957 Thank you. All these people talk as if they live here and know what's going on here. תודה לך. כל האנשים האלה מדברים כאילו הם גרים פה ויודעים מה קורה פה
@Ken Brownsher Because every negotiation has been in complete favor of Israhell and takes none of Palestinians needs in effect if you can't that then idk what to tell you
Abraham did NOT invade or occupy the Land of Canaan. GOD gave to him & his descendants. Israel re-established itself on the same land. In fact, GOD have Abraham the entire land. NOT part of it.
@@danhworth100 GOD's Covenant with Abraham has happened & is still in progress. WW1, WW2, UN, Britain, etc. were just the means to an end. NO one will STOP it.
The Bible says Israelites conquered the land and killed those who were there. But that was a lie. Archaeology proved it was all a lie. God gave them nothing.
idse total crap. The occupation myth was invented in 1967 when the PLO (palestine liberation organization) was created. The palestine that they are trying to get people to believe in had not been occupied by Israel. The west bank was still under Jordanian occupation while Gaza was still under Egyptian occupation. It was an arab occupation of people as well as land. Israel captured the west bank and Gaza in 1967. And no, in Israel there had never been an occupation of people. In Israel live 2.6 million arabs who have full parliamentary freedom. So.... what the hell are you talking about?
Finally, a word or two about flatus, the well-bred term for a fart. Flatus consists primarily of carbon dioxide (up to 50 per cent), hydrogen (up to 40 per cent), and nitrogen (up to 20 per cent), though the exact proportions will vary from person to person and indeed from day to day. About a third of people produce methane, a notorious greenhouse gas, while two-thirds produce none at all. (Or at least none on the occasions on which they have been tested; flatus testing is not the most exacting of disciplines.) The smell of a fart is composed largely of hydrogen sulphide even though hydrogen sulphide accounts for only about 1 to 3 parts per million of what is expelled. Hydrogen sulphide in concentrated form - as in sewage gas - can be highly lethal, but why we are so sensitive to it in trace exposures is a question science has yet to answer. Curiously, we don’t smell it at all when it rises to lethal levels. As Mary Roach put it in her splendid study of all things alimentary, Gulp, ‘the olfactory nerves become paralyzed’. All the gases of flatus can make a pretty explosive combination, as was tragically demonstrated in Nancy, France, in 1978 when surgeons stuck an electrically heated wire up the rectum of a sixty-nine-year-old man to cauterize a polyp and caused an explosion that very literally tore the poor man apart. According to the journal Gastroenterology, this was just one of ‘many recorded examples of explosion of colonic gas during anal surgery’. Nowadays, most patients undergo laparoscopic, or keyhole, surgery, which involves being insufflated with - or pumped full of - carbon dioxide, and that not only reduces discomfort and scarring, but eliminates the risk of explosive mishaps
@@amanjain4005 I spent my entire military service, plus I do my reserve duty in the West Bank. Israeli army can come and go, place arrests, and put Palestinians on trial in military courts, ruled by Israeli officers.
If one wishes to see what illegal occupation looks like , one should visit Nicosia and the Northern third of Cyprus , this territory IS illegally occupied by NATO member Turkey
@@yosafvictor5631I've spoken to Greeks Cypriots that fled the barbaric hoards of turkish soldiers invading their homeland with little more than the clothes on their bodies , they are STILL traumatised nearly 40 years on .The Turkish Cypriots were for the most part , located on the North Eastern part of the island nation , so why does turkey ILLGALLY occupy 1/3 of Cyprus ?
@@dovidell it has less to do with Idiology and more with money. without Cypris, By international laws, Turkey has almost no economic water zones under here control in the Mediterranean Sea. That means commernce, potential reach with gass land and more buffer to protect their land from invaders from the south. Israel have a similar problem. Israels Eastern border sits on the bed of the Jorden River because the river is in the Jordan Valie. If a firce will try to invade from the east, they will have to cross the valie, a position much easier to defend then on flat land (gives planty of time to bomb the invader before he willbe able to climb through the upper other side)
@@dovidell "i spoken to greek cypriots" without talking to turkish cypriots, your views are biased and far from truth. Have you ever considered to go into a war museum in north cyprus ? It is impossible to believe that the brain hanging on the ceiling once used to belong to a human, but massacred by greeks. "They are still traumatised after 40 years" well maybe they should have considered this before starting lay their stinky greek hand on turkish women and massacring entire populations (see 1963 bloody chrismast, a decade ago before turkish intervene). EOKA terrorist organization aiming to drive out all turkish cypriots. When Turkey adressed this issue to western powers, they did NOTHING. "Turkish cypriots were for the most part located on the norteast, so why does Turkey occupy 1/3 of the cyprus ?" There is an unrecognized state on the norteast part of cyprus, named north cyprus. Not in the south, were griks majoritly live. And Turkey freed north cyprus, using its rights from leusannes, to prevent an ethnic cleansing. Unlike isn'trael.
This presentation is quite biased though it is attempting to portray itself as neutral. It somehow managed to avoid mentioning all of Israeli politics since the 90s when a two-state solution was actually on the table. In the two decades since Israel's politics have leaned more rightward and a two-state solution is no longer an official government position. Not to mention the entire "settlers" issue isn't even mentioned nor is the actual conditions the Palestinians are forced to live under. It didn't even mention the formation of the The Palestinian Authority and it's international recognition. The only person they interviewed was some random Jewish young woman. If the point of the piece was to make young Jewish diaspora members more sympathetic to Israel and less aware of actual facts, then mission accomplished. If the point was to educate, then it fails miserably.
Because the Palestinians never agreed to the Two-State Solution. It was offered and repeatedly refused. When Palestine and Israel were two states, after the UN resolution, the Palestinians declared war because they would not abide by it. They said they were entitled to all the land, not just half. Still Israel tries to make peace and still Palestinian authorities repeatedly refuse. The charter of Hamas explicitly states that they will not rest until all the land is theirs. It's also riddled with pro-genocide antisemitic vitriol. You can look it up.
@@Andi_andI bro, if I came into your house, kicked you out of half of it claiming my great great great ancestor lived in it at some point so it was fair, didn't let you out cause oops I took the half that has the front door, and your sister or roommate who I kicked out when I came in is also no longer allowed inside at all, you'd also not accept that, you'd want me out of YOUR house, just sayin
Yes, after doing literally 3 minutes of research, although it as you pointed out tries to present itself as "neutral" and "unbiased" and "simply telling us facts", turns out Unpacked is owned by OpenDor Media, a non-profit dedicated to promoting zionism, oops
Yeah after doing a tiny bit of research turns out Unpacked is owned by a non-profit dedicating to promoting zionism called OpenDor Media, so yes, this is literally zionist propaganda trying to hide what it really is
Re: the first sentence. No. According to the entire world, (ie: 99%) Israel is an occupying force in the west bank. There's no "... depending on who you ask".
The fact is that "palestinians" came to existence only after the establishment of Israel. For example..if egypt were to conquer instead of Israel, then no one would even heard the word "palestine" or "palestinians" anymore or ever
The whole would = its occupation The logic= its occupation Intergalactic civilization= its occupation God= its occupation The isrealis = it depends on who you ask
The whole point of this video and this channel is to create confusion which is standard Israel state propaganda (hasbara). This is not even a conflict since the truth is that Israel and US break international UN law by not agreeing to pre 1967 borders and have always wanted all of the land without Palestinians. They have gotten away with it because of US aid and diplomatic and propaganda cover. They control every aspect of Palestinians- their economy, their electricity and water, their movement and ultimately their lives and that is why Israel is an apartheid state. 30,000+ civilians killed is not self defense but genocide!
I don't think you watched this video - we talk about the multiple sides to this conflict. And if you don't think there's a conflict, then I'm not sure what to tell you. Also you should learn more about the difference between war and genocide: ua-cam.com/video/kCcF947BlBs/v-deo.html
@@UNPACKED The initial conflict was never complicated! It was made so both in theory(hasbara) and practice(settlements) later to avoid any kind of a Palestinian state! Basic truth is US and Israel refuse to follow UN International resolutions of 2 states based on pre 67 borders (Palestine: West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem | Golan Heights back to Syria | Sinai back to Egypt | Israel: Everything else). Imagine if Palestinians started making settlements inside of Israel proper, they will immediately be termed terrorists! Also, why when Israelis commit ethnic cleansing of Palestine and kill them it is called the war of independence and when Palestinians resist their occupation , it is called terrorism?? Double Standards? Also you should learn more about the difference between Democracy and Occupation!
The conflict didn’t have to be so complicated, if the Arabs had only accepted any of the dozen offers of two-states that Israel had made or agreed to. Or if they had won a single war. But they rejected every offer of two states and peace, and they lost every war. Yikes! So that’s where we are 🤷♂️ Btw I don’t think you watched this video, which talks about Occupation. How about first you watch it, then you can comment about it :)
@@UNPACKED Already saw the biased video! The occupation would have ended only if Israel wanted true peace and given a fair deal to Palestinians. "Take what we throw at you or go back to living under our boot" is not a fair deal. -Also which war are you talking about? Palestinians are under occupation! They are 5 million refugees who don't have any army, air force or navy (and please don't compare Hamas's weapons to that of Israel! Hamas rockets as stated by Norman Finkelstein are mere fireworks in comparison to the tons of bombs used by IDF so much so that they have dropped 65,000 tons on a strip of land that is 41 kilometres (25 miles) long, from 6 to 12 km (3.7 to 7.5 mi) wide, which is more than the weight and power of three nuclear bomb dropped on the Japanese city of Hiroshima) in the most densely population area in the world where half of the population are children (Total population-2.3 million). -Also if Israel wants genuine peace, why are they still building settlements illegally on Palestinian territories??
The argument that because Judea existed in the past means that the state of Israel has a right to it would mens that Russia has a right to Ukraine since Kiev is it's birthplace.
ruzzia has stolen the Ukrainian history including the name "Russia". Kiev was the birthplace of Rusj now known as Ukraine. Moscow tzar Petr I in 1721 just took the Greek version of word "Rusj" and renamed his Moscow Kingdom into Russian Empire and proclaimed himself The Emperor of Russia.
@@runjr032 by Israeli logic, all the Arabs like Saudis, emiratis etc also have a valid claim to Levant since they are also semetic and can trace their origin to Levant, will Israel accept that?
@@wa7sh2anawa7sh9 Jordan army expel the Palestine refugees from the country after the 1970 Black September, when PLO try overthrow the Jordan king. PLO and refugees goes for Lebanon, wheres PLO start the fight of the (1975-1990) civil war.
Canannites built Jerusalem. Its was called Jebus ie. the Jebusite tribe of Canaan and Jerusalem (Uru-Shalim) means city of Shalim which was a Cannanite deity. Also you squatting bastards from Brooklyn and Poland this land was never yours
We are all Jew at one time . If the land was deeded to a palestian the Jews can’t just come in and take their land . These people still have deeds to the land
@@CritikillACClaimed He definitely didn’t watch the video lol. People just comment what they think out of anger and emotion without listening to people’s arguments.
@@CritikillACClaimed This video has nothing with impartial view. As a documentary requires, you need to present neutral voices or give the same amount of time to palestinian speakers which is not the case. Perhaps this is not a good video.
@@CritikillACClaimed it is technically an occupation status !! According to a definition adopted and endorsed by many organizations, When people are ruled by an entity without benefiting from the belonging status of that entity, in this case israeli citizenship, it is technically considered as an occupation, And therefore Israel is an occupying power.
are you referring to the civil war or something else ? .there was a time when there was a train line from Haifa to Beirut , so the idea that Israel was always at war with Lebanon is a myth
@@fanOmry israel won nothing. The pro-israel christian millitia they were sponsoring got beaten by the druze and syrians and israel got kicked out of the south by Hezbollah. The war ended with the Taïf agreement where “mandate” of lebanon was taken from israel and given to syria and israel’s lebanese allies lost all their power and their weapons were confiscated
@@kl6544 Not true... I mean... Where to start... Israel left Lebanon due to internal politics. *Which were sponsored by outside entities.* Honestly in any other countries the leaders of those Orgs would have been jailed at the least. The Paper trail isn't even secret. Whatever. This wasn't the Israeli 'Nam. It is what Russia was accused of in the Trump elections. Now... South. That was again, an Israeli one sided act. An act of misguided compassion. Had they used it to build their own... Rather as an attack start point, Israel would have left Judea, Samaria and Benjamine.-West bank to you. As it is, Israel is too nice to actually go back in. *and* continue to provide Gaza with Water and Power.. Among many things. And unless they get too annoying, go in to basically nothing more than take them down a pegg. But never actually reannex it. Because again, Too Nice. I forgot the rest of your drivel and don't actually care enough to reread.
U can not be an occupier if it is your land . This is Israel and that is it . Rome was the first to call this place Palestine . The Israelis were there long before making them the only true Palestinians .
AS I understand, Judea and Samaria are the birthplace of the Jewish people. Why is it that the West Bank was allocated to the Palestinians by the United Nations? Israel won the war, they are not occupying power. They just exercised what belongs to them. A State of Israel must be formed with the Israelis and Palestinians, with two-people in one state (but not a Jewish State) , with Constitution and By-laws to be followed by both people. Like the American Civil War, the North won the war but now it's the United State of America with strong Constitution and By-Laws. That's my opinion only. Let there be peace in Israel and the world.
doesnt matter if that the birth place of fcking ancestors thats not how things work france attacked nazis, nazis got paris that doesnt means paris is nazi capital. right to conquest doesnt exists anymore doesnt matter if you won that in a war now jew will accept israel as a non jewsih state and palestanians wont forgot thier nationality
@@stfup9360 Problem is most people have a country. Chinese people might be from Africa, but they have China, the French might be from Africa, but they have France. Mexicans might be from Africa, but they have Mexico. The Jews didn't have a country of their own since theirs was destroyed 2000 years ago. If they wanted their own country, where would you put it, if not in the only place where they are known to originate from? What land to they have a stronger claim to than this one? Unless of course the argument is that the Jews are the only people in the world who have no right to a county of their own at all and no claim to any land at all, which is an argument many people certainly make...
2 years late with the answer, but i believe the 1947 partition plan was based on the demographic of the land at the time, to reduce the amount of people that would have to be displaced in order to live under their preferred sovereignty. There were a lot more Arabs then Jews in the West Bank, as the Jews mostly got land north and west of it.
They’ve been at war since the beginning of 3 new eras I don’t believe it’ll ever be resolved unless you take away the factions just be one powerful force of people instead of half of one with two
The simple answer is that there is not one. The Ottoman Empire declared they had no claim after WW1. The British walked away from the mandate in 1948. Jordan abandoned its claim with the Oslo accord. The situation is unprecedented. Nowhere else is there a piece of land that has not been legally part of any existing country. So all the existing labels do not apply and all the standard international treaties do not work. The closest is the treaty made between the most interested parties. The PA and Israel. An agreement endorsed by the major powers. After all, everything we call international law is actually multilateral agreements. The is no super legislative body that implements it. The UN etc can only manage what the parties have agreed amongst themselves and cannot involve parties who never signed up in the first place
@@AhmadTheGoat There was no "Palestinians" as an Arab people then. Before 1948, when people talked about Palestinians, they ment Jews who lived in The Mandate For Palestine.He and many other prominent Zionist leaders talked about the Arabs of the land and their integration in the new Jewish state . For example: the prime-minister will always be ether Arabor a Jew, intermediate each election.
@@AhmadTheGoat could you give an example of the Israeli government ethnically cleansing Palestinians? I am aware of an Arab village or 2 being forcibly relocated during the 1948 war, but that’s all I’m aware of.
@@shaifridrich3349 The UN calls it occupation. Land acquired during wars is occupied land. After 1945 all UN member states are required to follow the UN charter and international law. If there is a dispute countries can refer to the ICJ. ICJ has ruled the west bank, Gaza and Jerusalem are occupied lands. Israel has yet to appeal the decision.
A major sign of ethnic cleansing or genocide is a notable decrease on a population. The Palestinian population in Gaza, Judea, and Samaria has increased (even with the murders of PA members by Hamas in Gaza and the PA' occasional assassination of dissidents in Judea and Semaria). There is no ethnic cleansing done by Israel. However, take the popular Palestinian chant, "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" calls for the total destruction of Israel and her inhabitants.
Was Jordan an occupying power 1948-67? Yes it was. Then the land was LIBERATED by Israel as a result of the war they did not start. British mandate was meant for reconstituting of Jewish home, French mandate was meant for Arab countries. Enough wars and terrorism already! Leave single Jewish state alone.
No it wasn't As an algerian I can say that Isreal is a occupation power If we walked with the point that ur religion give u the land or u live ther before so we can say Kenya can get all the world Israel is a occupation power British make it easy to make the state o Isreal and hard to the Palestinian to make Palestine
@@ahmahm6499 forget about religion, walk with international law. After the fall of Ottoman empire, the land was divided between all who claimed a piece. Geographic area Palestine was given to the Jews (later 3/4 were cut off and given to Arabs to create Jordan, and Jews agreed). French mandate was given to Arabs. There was no independent Arab state from present Arab League existing in the area before San Remo international conference. If you question legality of Israel, you then question legality of Lebanon, or Iraq... If you dont- then you are biased and ignorant (thats best case scenario). Try to learn history from different sources, you might be able to analyze and fire your Algerian history teacher. 😉 oh, an advice: dont comment if you dont know the subject. Not a good look.
Israel is an occupying force. A lot of things happened in two 2,000 years, it is not as if the Romans decided to expell the Jewish people yesterday. If is true that the Palestinians at first did no accept Israel but the Palestinian accepted the existence of Israel in the accords of Camp David. No argument can justify the settlements, the demolition and expropriation of Palestinian property. An addition the Palestinian people encounter all kinds of obstacles in daily living, one example is that only 3% of building permits are approved for Palestinians. The Romans committed a grave deed by expelling the Jewish people from their own land but this land was not empty for 2000 years, somebody always lived there. The two state solution would be the only fair solution but it does not look like this is possible now.
Israel have Right To Exist. God give them the land Give them forever by god himself I don’t believe Israel take the land from Arab the End Israel gone win because GOG Of. Israel
What do you mean sharing my home with a thief who stole stuff from my home ? And what?! That house I own belongs to the thief 3000 years ago ? And now all my house is taken away from me by force under gun threat? Wait what the thief got the right to defend himself and if I fight back I become the bad guy ? Okay enough none sense and let's face it , don't tell me about history 3000 years ago or 100000 , talk to ke about the last 100 years only, where were "Israel" ? Hypernating in Europe countries and woke up remembering they own a land all the sudden ? What if I tell you that Torah the hopy book of Jewish people itself mentioning the Jews GOT NO LANDS! and it's meant for them to exist among all nations including Muslims countries, easy come easy go , it's just not yet Mr. Moral occupation! Nothing last for ever and revise history, for once the Nazies thought the can capture the world ...
@@Abilliph palestine always existed from 2nd century ( kingdom of isreal god dommed in 720 bc and it was smaller then present isreal))) this name was given by romans . this and why arabs don't have a claim .. cause 3000 years back their fcking ancestors of isrealis used to live there arabs / Muslims were majority in that are for 1300 years until europeans came and west bank was given to Palestine by un .. gods promise , my fcking ancestors used to live there doesn't matters no place in earth was inhabited by one group and moreover west bank was a part of egypian empire 5000 years back so from no sense you can cut of arab conection
@@Abilliph muslims werent majoriy for a while its 1300 years and consistently jews are majority in isreal but not in palestine even if you count 700000 jacobs still not there is supposed and should be state of arab population they call it Palestine or Arab land its their choice and colonization, going to a war and winning land is not a 21st or 20 th century thing empires , age of colonization is over and jews did won this land by king david in 1030 bc
@@Abilliph international law is the reason Israel seat down to negotiation yeah i know still international law is a joke but recognition still matter a lot is now the world community recognizes west bank a part of Israel that's an end of a Palestinian state. and the reson palestine doesnt accept is Jerusalem the jerusalem should be shared even if palestanians get 10 % they still accept it no way palestanins would leave the al aqsa mosque .. divison of jerusalem can be done respectecting both jews and muslims or isrealis and palestanians . jerusalem is very senstive and abu dis is no jerusalem and it palestanians dont get at least a small part of jerusalem there is nothing left that they can ask for
@@Abilliph the green line comes under un partition plan of 1947 thats why should be a part of palestine if not palestine no way isreal can annex any part of thtat area
The state of Israel was forced on the Palestinians by the Balfour Declaration and then the UN (under American influence) . Jews and Palestinians are living with irresponsible British policy from WW1. Britain offered a Jewish National Home for the wrong reasons. No planning, no consideration of the indigenous population. Favour has always been given to Israel in terms of land, military support and setting up the state. Check the wording of the Balfour Declaration and League of Nations Mandate. Israeli has always had superpower sponsorship. Jewish historians like Tom Segev have provided evidence US and Israeli's knew Egypt was not going to attack in 1967. It was not therefore a war for security, US intervention provided this. The main problem is government supported sponsorship and funding of settlements. This prevents both peace and a Palestinian state. Laws in Israel have been made to legalise expulsion of Palestinians and Arab dissent is suppressed. Palestinians are not granted land or a tiny amount. This is well documented by Jewish and non-Jewish journalists. Goliath by Max Blumenthal documents this comprehensively The reality of Israel's birth cannot be hidden. A full, comprehensive history of the War of Independence clearly shows ethnic cleansing and war crimes. Israeli soldiers openly admit it. Israel's occupied territories are wrecking its reputation worldwide.
Agreed. This video is total Zionist propaganda. Also, legally speaking, the West Bank is an Apartheid state. The Jewish settlers who live there have Israeli citizenship and all the rights and power that comes from that whereas the Palestinians don't. Israeli settlers frequently destroy Palestinian property in the West Bank and receive minimal if any punishment from the Israeli government. The IDF forces Palestinians to go through checkpoints all over the West Bank just to get from place to place because it involves getting through Jewish settlements, which popped up after 1967. If Israel just never allowed settlers there, this wouldn't have become such a big problem. I'm not saying acts of terrorism against civilians are justified, but they occur on both sides and the best way to avoid the danger is for Israelis to just stay out of the West Bank.
Law is always open to interpretation. Considering the annexation of the West Bank by Jordan, the conquest of it by Israel in a defensive war, and the fact that the Palestinians never technically established a state, or agreed to borders, that could then be occupied, it gets really messy...
The problem is the British made conflicting promises to Jews and Arabs during World War I . The Israeli presence in the West Bank is relatively benign. If you’re a religious minority, where would you prefer to be Israel or Arab world?
The state of Palestine was created in 1988. All land conquered by Israel in defensive wars prior 1988, including the wars of 1948 and 1967, cannot be considered to be occupied since the political entity claiming to have its land occupied did not even exists yet.
@@mager888 yeah, funny thing about palestinian coins from 1927 is that It's written 'erets israel' on it, meaning 'Land of israel'. As for stamps, so what ? It doesnt take an sovereign state of palestine to make stamps. As for the palestine of the bible, the actual hebrew word is 'pelishtim', meaning 'invader' because they invaded the kingdom of israel and were pagans, and this long extinct people was the sworn ennemies of israel, and as i just said, went extinct thousands of tears ago. Most of modern so called palestinian refugies came to judea and samaria at the turn of the 20th century, and are not the thousand years old people your propaganda would have us believe. This is history, you can call it lies, but it only makes you pathetic. Have the strenght to admit the truth : this land belongs to israel, always has and always will .
@@mager888 The "Palestinian" coins, bills and stamps were not issued by a country called Palestine, they were issued by the British under the Mandate of Palestine. The currency was issued by the Anglo-Palestine Bank, which today is Bank Leumi. Everything that says Palestine on it in. an official capacity from 1922 - 1948 was issued by the British Mandate of Palestine.
I think it’s so easily forgotten that Israel doesn’t like the current situation either or that they didn’t ask for it. When the government makes decisions regarding the Palestinian people and Gaza/West Bank it’s not a multiple choice question with great options and one correct answer. Like building the security wall. I’m not the biggest fan of it, but how can I judge the Israeli government for picking that option when it secured the safety of its people. There were 30-60 suicide bombing’s, kidnappings, etc. committed against Israeli civilians yearly leading up to the building of it.
@@Drinkingyoursaltytearsallah It certainly has been a can of worms. I care less about the legality and more about the morality regarding "settlements". There are prominent Jewish cultural and spiritual sites in the West Bank. Should the descendants of the people that built those not be allowed to live near them? In their ancestral homeland. Native peoples in the USA and other places were forcibly removed from their ancestral lands to reservations. If they wanted to move back and build houses where their ancestors lived and where their culture developed, wouldn't it be morally wrong to tell them that they couldn't?
jordan cohen which begs the question Israel would resort to a one state solution. Extend citizenship to Palestinians living in East Jerusalem and the West Bank.
Israels borders were established by the 1922 League of nations mandate. So all the land from mediterranean sea to the jordan river is legally israel. The jordanian invasion of judea and samaria and subsequent ethnic cleansing of Jews was an illegal act. Same as egypt invading israel and artificially creating "Gaza Strip" (never historically existed) The only part of Israel you can say is "occupied" is the Golan Heights but thats because Syria used it to shell israeli villages intermittently. So they lost it in the 67 war.
“We have neither taken foreign land nor seized foreign property, but only the inheritance of our ancestors, which at one time had been unjustly taken by our enemies." Simon Thassi, 1 MACCABEES 15:33
@@dcrafton3988 I don't see the difference. I don't think religion should play a role in deciding who gets what, our world is based on separation of church and state. But If you're Jews are the only one with religious claim to the land, that's not necessarily true
@@ChickenVeggi You should see the difference because the philistine people were greek not arabs invading the kingdom of israel and judea, and the reason its sounds similar is because after the romans distroyed judea in 133AD they renamed the land palestina to emberess jews that their land is named after their former enemey and the name stuck, btw the name philistine comes from the hebrew word polesh which means invader because the philistines invaded israel and the kingdom of judah
@@samgreen7334 Israel is not what it use to be, it’s becoming a far right apartheid style county those never last. Democracy is the most difficult but most moral and ethical. The US is having its own crisis as well.
She literally has an Israeli flag behind her do you ppl really expect them to tell the truth? This is a biased channel and it's only aim is to pander to isrsrl
The only land that is Isreal is the land granted to it in 1947.The argument that Isreal is a much bigger area given to trhem thousands of years ago is nonsense,if that was the case all the U S A would belong to the native Americans,over the last thousand years there have been huge movements of populations,the Franks or French came from eastern Europe a thousand years ago,the English came from Europe 1500 years ago and pushed the Britons into Wales and Ireland,alsoJewish people werte forced out of Spain 600 years ago so perhaps Spain should be part of Isreal according to the argument,also the Biblical argument that the land was given to Isreal by someone 4000 years ago,well whoever this person was he forgot to tell the Chinese and Indians and everyone else except someone called Moses who seems to have been the son of an Egyptian Pharoh.
Because when the land was split that way for 2 states the Arab nations refused to accept and declared war on Israel from all sides with the explicit intention of wiping the Jews off the map. This right on the heels of the Holocaust. Big surprise, Israel won that war and was less open to sharing after that. Especially since nonstop terror attacks have continued ever since (and long before).
That does`nt give isreal the right to occupy land that is`nt theirs,,it is against international law to settle your citizens in occupied territory,Isreal has signed up to the agreements on international law so should observe these laws they have signed up tyo.
And even the 1947 partition can be discussed. I'm not sure I agree with the Ottoman empire and later the UK deciding what to do with that land in the first place
the actual reason that the Jewish population boosted is the Jewish Exodus from the middle east and north Africa,you can go and check what it really was anyway for the sake of argument,only 30% of jews are ashkenazi else are other ethnicities
It not a war when one side is fighting and the other is trying to survive. America should. demand Israel stop this war and if they dont know more money, supplies, or weapon.
How can you leave a territory knowing that you'll be attacked from that territory the moment that your leave? Israel must occupy whether or not it wants to.
It is a occupation. The fact that Isreal consistently denies this is absurd.
To claim a land that your ancestors vacated hundreds of years earlier as your birth right is completely ridiculous.
To use an analogy, think of it as if your great, great, great, great grandfather sold a 100 acre farm long ago. Do you genuinly believe you have a right to just show up and build a house, put in fencing around the present owners home and claim it as your own??
There is nothing antisemitic about calling out the Israeli state or Jewish government just like you would ANY occupying people.
Unfortunately, antisemitism is cited immediately when ANY legitimate critique is made...and there are many.
Except the land was never sold, it was stolen from the Israelites - 1/12th of which are the Jewish people who live today. 11 more tribes are expected to live in the land when Moshiach arrives so you better get used to seeing the Holy Land inhabited by its proper owners
This video might get an interesting like/dislike ratio :)
So far it seems pretty good!
The Israeli regime’s illegal settlement activities go on in al-Quds, Maliki said, and urged due confrontation against this policy on the part of Tel Aviv.
He called Iraq “Palestine’s loyal friend and supporter,” saying he was paying the visit to the Iraqi capital so the two sides could coordinate their political stances.
Hussein, for his part, urged the importance of continued unity among the ranks of the Palestinians, saying the recent victory in Gaza had to be deployed towards political gains.
He also assured Maliki that the Iraqi society sustained its support for the Palestinian cause of liberation from Israeli occupation and aggression.
UN reiterates support for Palestinians in Sheikh Jarrah
@@jake_a.lien_ it will be like in Netta's toy video which got about 400k dislikes in 1 week becauase of antisemic and antiisrael propaganda
@@dcrafton3988 I´m an israeli living aboard, and people I know disliked the song because they just didn´t like it, I didn´t hear anybody actually speak about antisemetism.
Love that strawmanning, not to mention that mixing in religious “history” and actual history, framing crimes against Palestinians much more softly. Now even if all of the stuff that was said is true you DON’T just get to say “hey they lived here thousands of years ago so GTFO”, if that was the case hen every indigenous population whether in Canada, US or Australia would be able to take ownership of their respective countries without question. Additionally, love that there is a complete lack of mention that the Israeli government funded Hamas so that it would break up the more secular movement by the PLO. The constant bad faith framing here is a pretty good indicator of whether you’ll propaganda or not.
That isn't a straw man at all, you are the one making the straw men, not only that
Cherry picking, false comparison/equivalence, and appeal to authority
Pretty sure 99% of Israelis know Hamas was the creation of Israel but them acknowledging that is them giving up a major victim card and that's a big no no for Jews.
In fact they didn't say "hey we lived here thousands of years ago so GTFO". They bought parts of those lands to Arab landlords, then the rest of their lands were given by the UN resolution 181 after the tragedy of the Holocaust and the rest of the lands were conquered through wars of defence (maybe except the 6 days war).
they never told palestinians to leave. if the six day war hadn't happened then palestinians wouldn't be displaced. also israel never funded hamas that is a ridiculous claim lmfao
@@staC-wh6ik Except in today's world through international law, a nation cannot expand its territories through conquest. That goes for many countries as well not just Israel though
The Supreme Court of Israel, themselves, labeled Israel as an occupying power, and labeled it "belligerent".
The Supreme Court of Israel is a Leftist CostraNostra that is staffed by self-hating, degenerate cultural Marxist Judges. When each elderly Judge retires, they bring in a fresh far lefty Judge to take its place.
The problem will be solved when the Likud wins the elections - hopefully on Nov 1st.
The supreme court is a joke we have all kinds of injustice in America and they do nothing to stop it. There corporate lackeys like a lot of us.
The Supreme Court of Israel is run by unelected Marxist Wakos. That was the reform was going to change before the Hamasonazis attack.
No, they were not referring “to the river to the sea.” Parts of the West Bank, etc.
@@robertortiz-wilson1588don't tell these morons the truth
Is America an occupying power
Actually yes they occupied north America of the Indians
Yes it was. Until it recognized the right of indians to be equal America citizens and not genocide the rest of them .
@@majdfares6637 that is true regarding Muslims in Israel. I know Muslims who live in Israel who vote and the rest. It's up to them to join society.
@@majdfares6637 they may have said the words but the actions were not as advertised.
Occupying a Territory like the United States did, and then recognize the people who lived in that territory as equal does not exonerate the United States from being an occupier. you can’t just walk in someone’s home take it from him and say “no it’s your home as well but it’s mine too”.
Do United States belong to the Indians, not you.
Free the Indians!!! You evil occupier!!
Well no matter how many thousand years your heritage to a place is, it still ignores the people who still live there
Anna Che your ignorance is so passe. Seriously? What would you say to somebody they're just decided to live in your house which you haven't lived in because you came to another country but it's still your house and they've been squatting there for 15 years and all of a sudden they say it's their house. Well that's the israeli-palestinian conflict and situation okay the land always belongs to Israel.
Obviously you know nothing about history because the kingdom other under King David and King Solomon. Would include parts of Lebanon parts of Syria and most of Jordan okay so what are you talking about Jordan never existed till after world war One did you know that the ruler of Jordan was actually a Saudi Arabian.
Hg
@@angelvpineda8148 most of them were Europeans
@@AbdulRehman-kz7lcjews all over the world came here.
It’s weird to claim any ethnic group has or doesn’t have the right to any particular piece of land. People seem to ignore the fundamentally racist nature of this entire conflict.
Yacubian devil: If i don’t steal your land somebody else will
Its fine fir all other Ethnicities to have their own countries, just Israel is a problem??
@@shainazion4073 natives had it waaay worse no one feels bad as crimes against humanity is being led by who again? Who uses gas and white phosphorus? Who implements apartheid again??? Who kicks ppl out their homes??? Jews are black not who occupy there. They have stolen lands and identity and it’s not hard to see for yourself with just a little bit of research
@@r.i.pyoutube6881 ok
Considering that the Muslims who didn't flee their homes in 1948 and their descendants are equal citizens with representation in all aspects of Israeli professions and daily life, your label of 'racist' does not apply.
If you want to apply that label to how the Palestinians were treated, apply it to the Arab countries whose false promises left a group of people homeless. Why aren't you asking why those countries didn't absorb those who fled?
Then ask about what happened to the property of the approximate 850,000 Jews kicked out of Arab countries. If you're concerned with righting what you perceive as wrong, where's your outcry for that gross injustice???
Is Isreal an occupying power ? = Is the sky blue ?
All land is occupied by someone
?!?
Based.
@@ALIKN1-1 ?!? How do you think your country was created?
I though this video would explaining the conflict behind it, unfortunately it’s just propaganda of one side of the history
Or you just realized how one sided this conflict is and can't admit you are wrong, because what they are telling is only facts, there is only one history for this place. Btw it's pretty hypocritical saying that since the ones using propaganda all the time are the palestinians and the BDS movement.
@@Eran_L no lol, because this is a israeli propaganda channel
@@kingbradley6000 let me guess, Al Jazeera fan?
Can you point out anything that isn’t true, and where they have left out part of the narrative? It is rare to see this level of historical detail. Israel is always painted as a Pantomime villain, without any context. I believe the truth is far more complex.
It sad you are fighting the real owners of the land since antiquities however the owners are so civil to live with you except you have to abhor terrorism or religious intolerance and killing or maiming anybody look at them contented to pray beside their holy wall given the fact they have the wall it means they are the original owners of the wall surroundings or the area itself the misled with religious conflict in the beginning whe you look at it the original owners faith was founded so many centuries ago while your religion was not even known so sooner ,don't be naive the fact that area was captured in a war it means they own the land already like those landgrabber nations today absurd as their own nobody protested except to listen of truth and listening to reason
I understand the need to condense tons of stuff into 8 minutes, but this video misses a lot of crucial information, whereas it gives too much attention to an individual's opinion. One who watches this without knowing the full story, might think that Israel just bursted into a place that has not been theirs for thousands of years.
What about the UN's Partition Plan for Palestine (1947) that gave both Israel and Palestine the full legitimate right to exist in the area, and defined the borders between the two? What about the war that the Arab world launched upon Israel soon after, as part of which Israel has legally obtained the other side's land?
You cannot start a war, lose it, and then call the winner an "ocuupying power", if you did, absolutely no country in the world as of today had any legitimacy over its borders, or existence.
It's a propaganda piece. The whole channel is.
@@MrClosetSpider Look, I have a rather scientific outlook on life, and I believe that there is one truth to everything. Whether France (for example) has legitimacy over its land or not is a simple yes/no answer. And if Spain (for example) thinks differently, they should prove it.
The same goes for anyone who claims that Israel must "close down" becuase it has no legitimacy. Prove it.
For now, all I hear is "Free Gaza" calls whereas it had already been 100% freed in 2005.
The Arabs who stayed in Israel have a peaceful life, enjoy the democracy and Constitutional Rights of all Israeli citizens, right along with the Arab Muslims, Bedouin Muslims (some IDF), Arab Christians (some also IDF), Christians, Arabs generally, B'Hai Faith, Druze (have sworn to fight to the end for the land) religious Jews, atheist Jews, Ethiopian Jews, all living together in peace, vs. Hamas territory. Everyone is represented in the Knesset, but the ones who left? Well, they haven't ever been free under their leaders. Hamas are terrorists regardless of anything else--why is that so difficult to see? Queers for Palestine---unbelievable & self dangerous ignorance perpetuated, because.....Jews? We are 0.2% of the world's population, on land formerly known as Judea ("Jew")-Samaria, approximately the size of New Jersey, while the surrounding Muslim countries sit on the entire rest of the region. Most Arabs have Jewish dna, African, and no small amount of European because of migratory patterns. European dna--are they then the rightful people of European land? The so called "palestinians" have lots of dna represented from many, many regions. Stand by America and Europe you are just as despised. Islam--started in 7th Century CE is the late comer on this scene, coming after both Judaism, about 3500 years old (1500 BCE) and Christianity 2000 years. Though Islam claims our Prophets as their own, Mohammed was born @ 560 CE. So, who got there first?
Am Israel Chai
Shalom!!!!
Am Yisrael Chai!!!
I support Palestine not Israel
Another little tidbit is the origin of the name Palestine. It came after 70 AD when the Roman Empire destroyed the second temple and Israel. They renamed the region from Judah to Palestine. The word Palestine is based on the name of the Phillistines as a way on mocking them.
@@petarjovanovic1481 yes it is.
Are you ignorant as hell?? The term Pe-le-set has been recognized even by the ancient Egyptians more than 4000 years ago. This means the term has existed for even longer than that.
@@joshuamelton9148 No, it's not. Iudea was renamed to Syria-Palaestina in 135, not 70.
@@hassanjamal4212 Bruh you are factually incorrect.
The name change came about in the 2nd century AD , when the Romans crushed the revolt of Shimon Bar Kokhba 132 AD, during which Jerusalem and Judea were regained and the area of Judea was renamed Palaestina.
@@Meirstein I mixed up 70 AD when it should have been 132 AD when Hadrian was the Roman Emperor at that time.
From the river of euphrates to river of nile belong to prophet Abraham children forever and ever true children of Abraham they are palestian people
Answer: yes.
Answer no, or at least far more complicated than that!
It is a common and widely spread misconception that Israel's 1948 Declaration of Independence was predicated on the 1947 General Assembly Partition Resolution 181(II). This belief is not factually accurate. The resolution was not adopted under Chapter 7 of the United Nations Charter and, consequently, did not possess legally binding force. Moreover, the resolution's outright rejection by the Arab League rendered it effectively null and void.
The establishment of the State of Israel was fundamentally based on the universal principle of international law known as 'uti possidetis juris.' This principle dictates that newly-formed sovereign states should inherit the internal borders of their preceding sovereign entities. In Israel's case, this included the borders of the British Mandate for Palestine, partially encompassing the Gaza Strip, the City of Jerusalem, and the West Bank. Therefore, upon adopting its Declaration of Independence, the State of Israel legitimately acquired title over these territories.
Another fundamental principle relevant to the creation of the State of Israel is the equal applicability of law. It is necessary to recognize that the legal principle 'uti possidetis juris' originating in Roman Law, has been applied multiple times over the past two centuries, providing a legal foundation for the creation of various state entities, including Syria, Jordan, and Lebanon. Consequently, denying Israel its rightful status based on the 'uti possidetis juris' principle could jeopardize the statehood and legitimacy of many United Nations member states. No international legal entity would permit such a precedent.
As a result of the belligerent and illegal invasion by Arab forces in 1948, the Gaza Strip, West Bank, and East Jerusalem were occupied by Egypt and Jordan. This occupation led to the ethnic cleansing of the Jewish population and the desecration or destruction of Jewish cemeteries and synagogues. During the 1967 war, instigated by Egypt and Jordan, Israel reclaimed these territories and reinstated its rightful ownership upon them.
Contrary to widely regurgitated assertions, the movement of 700,000 Israelis to Judaea and Samaria (aka West Bank) was not a result of governmental relocation efforts. This is a crucial consideration in the context of Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which pertains to the deportation or transfer of populations. It is widely acknowledged that these individuals were driven by their personal ideologies and religious beliefs, choosing to settle in these regions of their own volition. Indeed, many Jews from various countries have pursued their aspiration to establish a Jewish presence in areas of historical and religious significance, such as Judea and Samaria, commonly referred to as the West Bank.
Consequently, labeling these individuals as 'illegal occupiers' or 'colonizers,' and suggesting that the Israeli government 'forced' them into these areas, is a profound mischaracterization of the situation. Such descriptions fail to recognize the autonomous decision-making and personal motivations that underlie their settlement in these regions.
Let me recap.
1. Israel is rightful owner of all lands and territories of former British Mandate of Palestine.
2. Israel has been wrongly and maliciously accused of being an occupying power from the moment of its inception.
3. 700,000 Israeli villagers have perfect legal foundation to reside in West Bank.
Yes they are occupying THEIR OWN LAND!!!!
@@petarjovanovic1481
They are actually. 2.7 million palestinians live in Israel as full citizens with full parliamentary rights.
@@nurieln palestineans in the west bank can't vote...
@@ahmada7333
No they can't vote. They live in a Fatah dictatorship.
@@nurieln they can't vite in israeli** elections. Fatah is not a dictatorship.
Jew is a religion
Zionist is a religion
Israeli are imposters
It is ridiculously simple. In international law, for land to be 'occupied' its sovereignty must have been usurped. Obviously, there has never been Palestinian sovereignty anywhere. Thus, there is no 'occupation' anywhere. The Palestinians claim land they WANT is occupied, but wanting land is not sovereignty. All of this, of course, ignores the Oslo Accords, in which the PLO, the sole representative of the Palestinian people, agreed to Israeli control of Area C. Everyone studiously ignores the Accords, which they have to do in order to claim there is an occupation. As long as the international community colludes in the myth of 'occupied Palestinian land', the Palestinians will remain locked in their self-imposed victimhood. There is no Palestinian land west of the River Jordan. The Palestinian land is all to the east, and it is called Jordan. King Hussein of Jordan himself said "Jordan is Palestine and Palestine is Jordan".
This video showing up on my feed as a sponsored video def made me think something fishy was going on and after watching my presumption was correct. The fact this video only brings on a Israeli woman’s pov and fails to consider the Palestinian pov shows the bias in this video even though they go to lengths to make it seem like their is some understanding. Lots is facts and talking points missing from this video to make Israel seem like they have done no wrong doing.
What's a Palestinian? Oh yeah...... the fake people the psy-op created by the KGB and PLO to create an ancient people *in 1964* as an indigenous people that are made up mostly by Muslim refugees, as well as Arab laborers most coming to the land in the late 1800s, early 1900s.
Me too I was ignoring it for days but then clicked to confirm my suspicion. FREE PALESTINE 🇵🇸!
As an Israeli i can tell you that if any video claims to explain the context of the Israeli Palestinian conflict in 8 minutes, you can safely assume it's going to be missing most of the relevant facts... You can't cram 100 years of war into 8 minutes no matter how biased or objective you try to be...
Why is this a sponsored video? Who is paying for this?
INDIA, ISRAEL brother's together ❤️
India belongs to Pakistan
Israel belongs to Palestine
@@Cjnw wait, what is pakistan ?
@@Cjnw India is 80% Hindu, 15% Muslim. If you believe Pakistan owns India you need to study maths.
@@WHU63
Many muslims think all nations belong to them ...
@@88feji Manu Israeli think Palestine belong to them
Israel is not ocuppying powe r.
God bless Israel.
I don't know who needs to hear this, but the definition of zionism isn't "what ever the Israeli govement does", it means the self determination of the Jewish people. It doesn't inherently exclude other people's self determination or rights. OK, now I am going to bed, have a nice day
Ppl don't understand u can be a Zionist and a pro Palestinian/ pro Israel basically pro co existence
@Waleed The displacement or refugee crisis was a result of war between the fledgling state of Israel and the combined Arab Armies in 1948. It was tragic for the Arabs. Jews were ethnically cleansed from Hebron and East Jerusalem when Jordan captured the West Bank. They destroyed more than 50 synagogues. After 1948, about 850 thousand Jews were expelled or forced to flee from the Arab countries - the Middle East and North Africa. Jews were living in those lands for many centuries. Majority went to Israel. The Palestinian Arab refugees and their descendants in Arab countries were never granted to become citizens. The Arabs who remain in Israel were given full and equal rights. While Israeli Arabs only constitutes 20% of the population, 30% of doctors and 35% of pharmacists in Israel were Arabs. The Druze people and some Arabs serves in the army and plays an active role in Israeli society. 1967, Israel launched a preemptive strike when Egypt sent forces to the border and close the straits of Tiran in the Red Sea. Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza, Sinai and the Golan Heights. Israel offered to bring back the territories in exchange for peace. The Arab league refused to accept the offer. In 1979, Egypt and Israel signed a peace agreement and the Sinai was handed back to Egypt.
@Waleed israel wont allow mass return of muslims to israel because israel isnt suicidal.we aint gonna allow in millions of people who see us as enemies,who were engaed in armed conflicts against us till few years ago and that still hold a grudge against us.india aint gonna allow millions of muslims from pakistan in,pakistan wont allow millions from india in,european countries wont allow millions of muslims back in and dont intend to be the first country to commit voluntary suicide by allowing the country to gain instantaneous muslim majority...
@Waleed stupid excuse that logically is not even possible unless you want to cause chaos 🙄
@Waleed in order to create a Jewish state
non Jews had to be removed
the definition of Zionism is ethnic cleansing
For whatever reason Israel has the right to,exist like any other country has. They have always had to fight to exist. So enjoy what you have for real estate. This Palestine problem gone on long enough. Palestine also has a right to govern itself also. They will destroy each other eventually and Hamas is not helping this fight.
Israel is not an occupation power France is England is the us is not Israel never
All Toole
Even Google translate failed to decipher your crap.
What
What about golan heights
Prophet Abraham was NOT a JEW he was an ARAB IRAQI from the town called UR south of IRAQ near euphrates river ziggurat and all his descendents were arabic people and prophet of God
Abraham was an Aramean, not an Arab. The Arabs invaded Iraq to spread Islam after the 700s. The Arameans were Levantines, not Arabs! They were a Semetic people, not speaking Arabic, but Aramaic or Akkadian.
Jordan occupied Judea and Samaria. We released the Jewish territories.
You want the land but not the people, that’s why you’re stuck where you are. If you dare, just annex the west bank already! Oh, you can’t do that, because that means you need to give citizenship to 4 million palestinians
@@petarjovanovic1481 Even if you repeat 10 times the word apartheid it wan't make it true
@@ilyasmusa4196 Believe me the Arabs there pray to god to be part of Israel instead of part of the Palestinian Authority. When Netanyahu said he will give back the PA some Israeli villages the Israeli Arabs started demonstrating against it
@@petarjovanovic1481 you've visited South Africa to see apartheid/post apartheid policies first-hand to arrive that your " monumental ( with emphasis on mental ) opinion I presume ?
@@petarjovanovic1481 it's OBVIOUS that your trash talk opinion is based on left wing media and BDS handouts - in truth , you are AFRAID of visiting Israel to see the truth first hand , lest your " glorious" ideals are crushed in front of your eyes
This time getting rid of hamas
Hasbara with lipstick
So which side has 46 countries and which only has ONE nation thats getting attacked?
Even if we don't call israel an occupying power for occupying west bank. It's still an occupying power for golan heights. Syria borders are well defined and was part of French colony and not Britain so israel is definitely an occupying regime
@@Abilliph there are still many druze arabs living there although Israel has given them citizenship they are still Syrians and in the eyes of international communities the golan heights belongs to syria
Didn’t Syria attack Israel through the Golan Heights in 1973 and finally gets smashed militarily? Now they want it back?
Israel is entitled in law to occupy the Golan. Syria invaded Israel in 1973. That war is ongoing, which means in law Israel may hold the Golan until Syria makes peace, which is unlikely ever to happen.
Na Palestine never existed
After watching this video
Me: thats what an occupier would say
Who cares?, They described occupation in a peaceful way and if Palestinians fight back they call them ‘Terrorists’, Israel raped their lands killed their children and still thursty for making Israel the ruler of the whole country.
@@amd99288 If that was remotely true... there would not be any Arabs in Israel.
@@fanOmry "if we're oppressing you then how are still alive?" Such a dumb talking point but what else can I expect from a channel who's audience is pro Israel
@@alrighty4456
Now don't be coy.
Israel is accussed of genocide on the regular.
Is Israel actually made such policy. They would all be dead.
@@fanOmry Israel isn't committing a "genocide" per se, that's China obviously. But Israel is committing either a violent occupation at best or apartheid at worst.
Most biased thing ever
Hamas was supported by Israel.
Hamas has been supported by Israel? Please explain your reasons for saying that.
@@willisswenson3843 DYOR, but yes. They - Israel, funded them to get them up & started. I'm not saying that they are CURRENTLY funding them but it's well known that Israel helped in the beginning.
@@willisswenson3843Google is free
@@scubamaz1hahahahaha israili funded by amrica europe hamas no have sport
Matatan
*®*
Ribirin H-S,
When this channel has a problematic topic to discuss, they bring in some nice young woman with some childish narrative and a "personal story" as if an anecdote may explain amything. Anyway... beating round the bush for 8 min, pretty useless clip, just a contribution to the propaganda war which we, normal people, should stay away from as much as we can.
of the historic event stated here/
what wasn't accurate and objective?
Lol you only assume its beating around the bush because you have an agenda.
The point of staying unbiased means you have to also accept other points as possibly right.
As for propoganda, almost everything can be precived as propoganda, especially on social media.
war criminals
Is Israel committing war crimes? ua-cam.com/video/kCcF947BlBs/v-deo.htmlsi=pSUMXhH8c-DAaH9F
Omg, I love it so much that you folks invited the tzniut feminist, an absolute icon!
53 US lawmakers warn of Israel's use of collective punishment in Gaza, demand siege removal
The US withdrawal from Afghanistan bears striking similarities to Washingtons 1975 pullout of Vietnam and Israels retreat from Southern Lebanon in the year 2000.
Many have concluded that this is another sign of the decline of the US and possibly its allies like Israel.
After all, the US could not even execute an evacuation from Afghans capital Kabul, requiring the Pentagon to give briefings to the world, seen as damage control.
What lessons can the West learn from the outcome of Americas longest war?
If you do a Israel Palestine video you will get a lot of dislikes
This video didn't provide the context I was looking for and what is probably the most crucial question in the matter: is the israeli population a willing, culturally and or ethnicly distinct group who embraced soveregnity, or is Israel forced on the native population by some outside invading force? As far as I know the continuity of a Jewish power is far from intact historically, whatever language the dirt is speaking according to the claims of the "culture of the land".
The facts are easy to follow. Whether Israeli people or Jews were here before or not has only historical context.
▪︎The land was the Ottoman Empire's land, they signed it over to the Allies after WW1. The Allies turned the responsibility of the land over to the League of Nations.
▪︎ The League of Nations created 3 Mandates to start new countries, and they assigned the rest of the Ottoman lands to existing countries.
▪︎ Three Mandates were created, the Mandate of Mesopotamia (Iraq), the Mandate of Syria and Lebanon, and the Mandate of Palestine.
▪︎ The Mandates were under the temporary administration of an Allied power until the countries could develop a stable government.
▪︎ At the San Remo conference and the Paris Peace Conference it was decided that a Jewish state would ve reestablished in the Area of Palestine. A unanimous vote (all 51 states of the League of Nations in July 1922) voted this into law.
▪︎ The Mandate of Palestine had one mission only, to reestablish the Jewish homeland in the Area of Palestine.
▪︎ The British gave 77% of the land to the Hashemites to become trans-Jordan, leaving only 23% of the land to become the Jewish homeland.
▪︎ The British illegally offered the Arabs 80% of the land that was left (23%) as a state in 1937, Peel Commission. The Arabs turned it down because they didn't want the Jews to even have the 20% left ( 4.5% of the original Mandate lands)
▪︎The Jewish Agency became the defacto government ss per the Charter of the Mandate of Palestine. The Arabs were causing riots and massacres. The Arabs never created a government, the Arab factions refused to go to any seminars or conferences to discuss the future of the land, as the Jews were also invited.
▪︎ All the other Mandates were turned over to the Arab governments, the British refused to turn the land over. The British Mandate was ending, the British turned the Responsibility over to the newly formed United Nations.
▪︎ The United Nations suggested in Resolution 181, the Partition Plan, to create 2 states, an Arab state and a Jewish state. The Arabs again said no, the Jews created a Jewish state based on the borders suggested by the UN. It was announced on May 14, 1948 as the British Mandate officially ended.
▪︎ Within 24 Hours, 5 Arab countries attacked the one day old country, Israel.
Read the Charter of the British Mandate, it was established to create a Jewish country to reestablish the Jewish homeland based on their historic ties to the country.
@@shainazion4073 Thank you very much for taking the time to write all this down. This may provide a lead to get a deeper understanding of the situation over there.
@@Vagolyk I'm glad it gave you some background information. The idea of a Jewish homeland, was never to only have Jews there, the Arab people were never in any of the plans or actions to be forced out of the land. After the Partition plan was announced, many of the Arab inhabitants left for areas that would not be under Jewish control in the plan.
The Arabs who stayed are full citizens of Israel with the same rights and benefits as all citizens.
The answer to the question is that nobody has claim to the land in that sense.
What this question that you asked in the context of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict is if either side has the right to commit genocide against the other. The answer to that being that both sides will only ever have equal right to genocide the other.
This war has never been about colonization, it has always been about religion and Islamic attitudes towards Judaism.
In this sense Israel has at worst as strong a claim to the land as Palestine.
So in that sense any argument of governmental legitimacy comes from which government would better be able/willing to guarantee the rights to life liberty and property. In this sense the Israeli government is only more legitimate relative to the Palestine government.
Yes.
In the West Bank, Israel is by definition considered to be an occupying power. It has even acknowledged this much in arrangements with the PA, devolving certain responsibilities of occupying powers laid out in treaties of which Israel is party to the PA (including the very treaties you laid out in this video). Just look at the debacle over Israel's responsibility or lack there of to vaccinate Palestinians. The argument the Israeli government made was that they had devolved those powers, not that they weren't an occupying power under international law.
Whether it is "occupying" the 67 and 48 integral areas is another thing entirely...
Lies just come easy for some
@Ploni Almoni According to the UN, occupying the State of Palestine - which is an observer state; more states also recognize the "State of Palestine" than Kosovo. I don't particularly support Palestine, but it is what it is. Israel is certainly not considered to legally be an occupying power in the 48 lands by anyone. That is just anti-Israel propaganda and Arab nationalism leaking into modern leftism.
This is utterly misleading, jewish people alnog with muslims and christians were living in peace in Palestine before this zionism movement which wanted All the land to only one group and discriminate all other groups, imposing all kinds of oppression and power. They wanted a jewish state in all Palestine from day one, not after the six day war.
Arabs stood against discrimination of the palestinian arabs.
What if you live in a place where you and your ancestors live for thousands of yeras, and suddenly a large group of people born every where in the world come at once and say get out of this land, it's ours, we were there some thousands years ago, oh and you wob't have a place or a nationality of your own and if you refused and start defending your home so every media outlet in the west will call you a terrorist.
If this is not an occupation, what is?
The video also spoke about the jewish historical places in palestine not mentioning the third most holly mosque in Islam is also there and the Qyama church which is also there. The video mislead the viewer of thinking the land is historically only to one group which is the jews, where it belongs to all the 3. Only one decided to take it all over by FORCE and killings, and you see an occupation is not a suitable word!??!!!
No, there was not peace for Jews under the Ottomans, or in other Muslim lands. The Jews were discriminated against and forced to live as second class citizens or worse.
The Arabs were appealed to by the Jews to stay in their houses and help them create a country together. The Arabs answered by having 5 Arab armies attack the one day old country of Israel.
The British gave away 77% of "Palestine" to the Hashemites before there was even an Israel. There was no one Palestinian people. In 1922, the British Census had over 30 languages spoken by the Arabs in the land. There were all different languages, religions, ethnicities, cultures, nationalities.
There were; Muslims, Christians, Druze, Samaritans, Bahai, Mandeans, Orthodox, Shiites, Salafis, Sunnis, Syrians, Circassians, Chechins, Bosniaks, Kurds, Turks, Berbers, Slavs, Greeks, Georgians, Persians, Tartars, Ashiri, Mongols, Sudanese, Armenians, Maronites, Lebanese, Egyptians, Jordanians and more.
Which one of these were the Palestinian people? Who was their leader? Who was to have made decisions for these people?
@@ahmedessam5804 There is no Holy mosque in Israel. The al Aqsa mosque was not built until 70 years after Muhammed's death. There was no Muslims in Jerusalem during Muhammed's lifetime. Muhammed never came to Jerusalem ever in his life.
The Real al Aqsa mosque was in Ji'irrana, Saudi Arabia near Taif. The Umayyads named the mosque after the passage in the Quran in order to make Jerusalem into an important place for Muslims. It was not.
lmao yes it is
Prove it.
@@thethebest3263 it's been proven, many times. read the geneva conventions.
True children of Abraham they are palestian people who were jewish and converted to Islam and the zionist jews they are NOT children of Abraham they are children of japheth european people who were statue worshipers idols worshipers and converted to jewdaim and now claim the holy land palestian
Go back to home to russia and poland and ukraine bulgaria and hungria and france and germany and holland and sweden and not the holy land palestine 🤲🕋🕯️🙏📿🕊️☮️
@@marienovak3663
A Zionist is a Political movement, not an ethnicity! Prophet Moses was the first Zionist, working to get his people to Zion.
70% of Jews and 82% of "Palestinians" with roots in that land have the same Y-chromosomes, meaning they come from the same ancient core population.
Ashkenazi Jews are the closest genetic match to Palestinians out of all the Jewish diaspora communities, so are Palestinians converts from Japeth??
@@marienovak3663Eighty percent of Israeli Jews are Sabras, Sixty percent of Israeli Jews are Mizrahi Jews forced out of the Arab Muslim countries because Israel became a state! Jews from Egypt, Iraq, Iran, Algeria, Morocco, Lebanon, Syria and other places. Start recognizing facts!!
Israel is a great country.
Proud to be israeli 🇮🇱
You "israelis" should really ask your rulers why they treat the Palestinians almost the same way the nazis treated your ancestors
@@daboss6614 how israel treats palestinians isn't even close to how the nazis treated the jews.
I'm not a jew, i'm arab and us israeli arabs live in a much better circumstances than arabs in arab country so thankgod it's israel here not falestine. Unless you were born and raised there (israel/palestine) please don't talk cuz you're not gonna make a good point trust me
@@deegytf6957 Thank you. All these people talk as if they live here and know what's going on here. תודה לך. כל האנשים האלה מדברים כאילו הם גרים פה ויודעים מה קורה פה
@@kobo132 בדיוק
@Ken Brownsher Because every negotiation has been in complete favor of Israhell and takes none of Palestinians needs in effect if you can't that then idk what to tell you
Abraham did NOT invade or occupy the Land of Canaan. GOD gave to him & his descendants. Israel re-established itself on the same land. In fact, GOD have Abraham the entire land. NOT part of it.
Irrelevant in the real world
@@danhworth100 GOD's Covenant with Abraham has happened & is still in progress. WW1, WW2, UN, Britain, etc. were just the means to an end. NO one will STOP it.
If you want to discuss it this way, then remember that arabs also descend from Abraham!
The Israelites were a Canaanite tribe that stopped child sacrifice and believed in the one true God,
The Bible says Israelites conquered the land and killed those who were there. But that was a lie. Archaeology proved it was all a lie. God gave them nothing.
Occupation is about the people, not about the land
idse
I am sure that you intended to sound intelligent.... share with us. What did you intend?
idse
total crap. The occupation myth was invented in 1967 when the PLO (palestine liberation organization) was created. The palestine that they are trying to get people to believe in had not been occupied by Israel. The west bank was still under Jordanian occupation while Gaza was still under Egyptian occupation. It was an arab occupation of people as well as land.
Israel captured the west bank and Gaza in 1967. And no, in Israel there had never been an occupation of people. In Israel live 2.6 million arabs who have full parliamentary freedom.
So.... what the hell are you talking about?
@@nurieln you haven't actually disputed my point. These people living in the West Bank are under military occupation
Finally, a word or two about flatus, the well-bred term for a fart. Flatus consists primarily of carbon dioxide (up to 50 per cent), hydrogen (up to 40 per cent), and nitrogen (up to 20 per cent), though the exact proportions will vary from person to person and indeed from day to day. About a third of people produce methane, a notorious greenhouse gas, while two-thirds produce none at all. (Or at least none on the occasions on which they have been tested; flatus testing is not the most exacting of disciplines.) The smell of a fart is composed largely of hydrogen sulphide even though hydrogen sulphide accounts for only about 1 to 3 parts per million of what is expelled. Hydrogen sulphide in concentrated form - as in sewage gas - can be highly lethal, but why we are so sensitive to it in trace exposures is a question science has yet to answer. Curiously, we don’t smell it at all when it rises to lethal levels. As Mary Roach put it in her splendid study of all things alimentary, Gulp, ‘the olfactory nerves become paralyzed’.
All the gases of flatus can make a pretty explosive combination, as was tragically demonstrated in Nancy, France, in 1978 when surgeons stuck an electrically heated wire up the rectum of a sixty-nine-year-old man to cauterize a polyp and caused an explosion that very literally tore the poor man apart. According to the journal Gastroenterology, this was just one of ‘many recorded examples of explosion of colonic gas during anal surgery’. Nowadays, most patients undergo laparoscopic, or keyhole, surgery, which involves being insufflated with - or pumped full of - carbon dioxide, and that not only reduces discomfort and scarring, but eliminates the risk of explosive mishaps
@@amanjain4005 I spent my entire military service, plus I do my reserve duty in the West Bank. Israeli army can come and go, place arrests, and put Palestinians on trial in military courts, ruled by Israeli officers.
If one wishes to see what illegal occupation looks like , one should visit Nicosia and the Northern third of Cyprus , this territory IS illegally occupied by NATO member Turkey
With all sincerity turkish army their was essential to protect the turkish Cypriots.
They have the right to live their too u know.
@@yosafvictor5631I've spoken to Greeks Cypriots that fled the barbaric hoards of turkish soldiers invading their homeland with little more than the clothes on their bodies , they are STILL traumatised nearly 40 years on .The Turkish Cypriots were for the most part , located on the North Eastern part of the island nation , so why does turkey ILLGALLY occupy 1/3 of Cyprus ?
@@dovidell it has less to do with Idiology and more with money. without Cypris, By international laws, Turkey has almost no economic water zones under here control in the Mediterranean Sea. That means commernce, potential reach with gass land and more buffer to protect their land from invaders from the south.
Israel have a similar problem. Israels Eastern border sits on the bed of the Jorden River because the river is in the Jordan Valie. If a firce will try to invade from the east, they will have to cross the valie, a position much easier to defend then on flat land (gives planty of time to bomb the invader before he willbe able to climb through the upper other side)
@@yosafvictor5631 Yes, under Cypriot rule. They don’t have the right to take a third of the island and then bring in mainland settlers.
@@dovidell "i spoken to greek cypriots" without talking to turkish cypriots, your views are biased and far from truth. Have you ever considered to go into a war museum in north cyprus ? It is impossible to believe that the brain hanging on the ceiling once used to belong to a human, but massacred by greeks.
"They are still traumatised after 40 years" well maybe they should have considered this before starting lay their stinky greek hand on turkish women and massacring entire populations (see 1963 bloody chrismast, a decade ago before turkish intervene). EOKA terrorist organization aiming to drive out all turkish cypriots. When Turkey adressed this issue to western powers, they did NOTHING.
"Turkish cypriots were for the most part located on the norteast, so why does Turkey occupy 1/3 of the cyprus ?"
There is an unrecognized state on the norteast part of cyprus, named north cyprus. Not in the south, were griks majoritly live. And Turkey freed north cyprus, using its rights from leusannes, to prevent an ethnic cleansing.
Unlike isn'trael.
This presentation is quite biased though it is attempting to portray itself as neutral.
It somehow managed to avoid mentioning all of Israeli politics since the 90s when a two-state solution was actually on the table. In the two decades since Israel's politics have leaned more rightward and a two-state solution is no longer an official government position. Not to mention the entire "settlers" issue isn't even mentioned nor is the actual conditions the Palestinians are forced to live under. It didn't even mention the formation of the The Palestinian Authority and it's international recognition. The only person they interviewed was some random Jewish young woman.
If the point of the piece was to make young Jewish diaspora members more sympathetic to Israel and less aware of actual facts, then mission accomplished. If the point was to educate, then it fails miserably.
Because the Palestinians never agreed to the Two-State Solution. It was offered and repeatedly refused. When Palestine and Israel were two states, after the UN resolution, the Palestinians declared war because they would not abide by it. They said they were entitled to all the land, not just half. Still Israel tries to make peace and still Palestinian authorities repeatedly refuse. The charter of Hamas explicitly states that they will not rest until all the land is theirs. It's also riddled with pro-genocide antisemitic vitriol. You can look it up.
@@Drinkingyoursaltytearsallah Fake news.
@@Andi_andI bro, if I came into your house, kicked you out of half of it claiming my great great great ancestor lived in it at some point so it was fair, didn't let you out cause oops I took the half that has the front door, and your sister or roommate who I kicked out when I came in is also no longer allowed inside at all, you'd also not accept that, you'd want me out of YOUR house, just sayin
Yes, after doing literally 3 minutes of research, although it as you pointed out tries to present itself as "neutral" and "unbiased" and "simply telling us facts", turns out Unpacked is owned by OpenDor Media, a non-profit dedicated to promoting zionism, oops
Yeah after doing a tiny bit of research turns out Unpacked is owned by a non-profit dedicating to promoting zionism called OpenDor Media, so yes, this is literally zionist propaganda trying to hide what it really is
Re: the first sentence.
No. According to the entire world, (ie: 99%) Israel is an occupying force in the west bank. There's no "... depending on who you ask".
The fact is that "palestinians" came to existence only after the establishment of Israel.
For example..if egypt were to conquer instead of Israel, then no one would even heard the word "palestine" or "palestinians" anymore or ever
It is the real occupation and don't try to spread a lie.
This channel is founded by Israel.
Can you point out what is a lie in the video?
@@UNPACKED
All
@@UNPACKED you are ignoring the fact that this is the real occupation.
Still waiting for the lie…
The whole would = its occupation
The logic= its occupation
Intergalactic civilization= its occupation
God= its occupation
The isrealis = it depends on who you ask
The whole point of this video and this channel is to create confusion which is standard Israel state propaganda (hasbara). This is not even a conflict since the truth is that Israel and US break international UN law by not agreeing to pre 1967 borders and have always wanted all of the land without Palestinians. They have gotten away with it because of US aid and diplomatic and propaganda cover. They control every aspect of Palestinians- their economy, their electricity and water, their movement and ultimately their lives and that is why Israel is an apartheid state. 30,000+ civilians killed is not self defense but genocide!
I don't think you watched this video - we talk about the multiple sides to this conflict. And if you don't think there's a conflict, then I'm not sure what to tell you. Also you should learn more about the difference between war and genocide: ua-cam.com/video/kCcF947BlBs/v-deo.html
@@UNPACKED The initial conflict was never complicated! It was made so both in theory(hasbara) and practice(settlements) later to avoid any kind of a Palestinian state! Basic truth is US and Israel refuse to follow UN International resolutions of 2 states based on pre 67 borders (Palestine: West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem | Golan Heights back to Syria | Sinai back to Egypt | Israel: Everything else). Imagine if Palestinians started making settlements inside of Israel proper, they will immediately be termed terrorists! Also, why when Israelis commit ethnic cleansing of Palestine and kill them it is called the war of independence and when Palestinians resist their occupation , it is called terrorism?? Double Standards? Also you should learn more about the difference between Democracy and Occupation!
The conflict didn’t have to be so complicated, if the Arabs had only accepted any of the dozen offers of two-states that Israel had made or agreed to. Or if they had won a single war. But they rejected every offer of two states and peace, and they lost every war. Yikes! So that’s where we are 🤷♂️
Btw I don’t think you watched this video, which talks about Occupation. How about first you watch it, then you can comment about it :)
@@UNPACKED Already saw the biased video! The occupation would have ended only if Israel wanted true peace and given a fair deal to Palestinians. "Take what we throw at you or go back to living under our boot" is not a fair deal.
-Also which war are you talking about? Palestinians are under occupation! They are 5 million refugees who don't have any army, air force or navy (and please don't compare Hamas's weapons to that of Israel! Hamas rockets as stated by Norman Finkelstein are mere fireworks in comparison to the tons of bombs used by IDF so much so that they have dropped 65,000 tons on a strip of land that is 41 kilometres (25 miles) long, from 6 to 12 km (3.7 to 7.5 mi) wide, which is more than the weight and power of three nuclear bomb dropped on the Japanese city of Hiroshima) in the most densely population area in the world where half of the population are children (Total population-2.3 million).
-Also if Israel wants genuine peace, why are they still building settlements illegally on Palestinian territories??
You should watch this video about how the occupation can end: ua-cam.com/video/1kYWII25cxM/v-deo.html
Commenting for algorithm🇮🇱💙🇮🇱💙🇮🇱
So yous support death and murder of innocent men women and children from nazi Israel hope yous are proud
@@joecully5761 XD
@יעקב ייגר no its facts you obviously live under a rock
@@joecully5761 "nazi israel" hahahaha and somehow YOU are the offended one? 🤣🤣🤣
@@YoungDumBased what isreal are doing to gaza is nazi like 💁♂️
The argument that because Judea existed in the past means that the state of Israel has a right to it would mens that Russia has a right to Ukraine since Kiev is it's birthplace.
ruzzia has stolen the Ukrainian history including the name "Russia". Kiev was the birthplace of Rusj now known as Ukraine. Moscow tzar Petr I in 1721 just took the Greek version of word "Rusj" and renamed his Moscow Kingdom into Russian Empire and proclaimed himself The Emperor of Russia.
Before Judea even existed ,it was all under ancient Egypt so does that give the Egyptians the full right to levant?
@@Akazarengoku208 you are making the same point as me.
@@runjr032 exactly their argument is bs
@@runjr032 by Israeli logic, all the Arabs like Saudis, emiratis etc also have a valid claim to Levant since they are also semetic and can trace their origin to Levant, will Israel accept that?
تحيا فلسطين
How can you be an occupier to your owned land? You mean, it's the palistine who built Jerusalem or the city of David???
Actually Palestinians are of the Descendants of the the ancient Hebrews .
@@wa7sh2anawa7sh9 actually not most of the Palestinians came from jordan and egypt. Not from judea or sameria
@@mikihay There is only a few native Jordanians while the majority of Jordan’s population are Palestinians who moved as refugees after 1948 and 1967 .
@@wa7sh2anawa7sh9 Jordan army expel the Palestine refugees from the country after the 1970 Black September, when PLO try overthrow the Jordan king.
PLO and refugees goes for Lebanon, wheres PLO start the fight of the (1975-1990) civil war.
Canannites built Jerusalem. Its was called Jebus ie. the Jebusite tribe of Canaan and Jerusalem (Uru-Shalim) means city of Shalim which was a Cannanite deity. Also you squatting bastards from Brooklyn and Poland this land was never yours
We are all Jew at one time . If the land was deeded to a palestian the Jews can’t just come in and take their land . These people still have deeds to the land
Really is this a question to ask ofcorse it is an occupying power
She literally explained the entire thing and as to why this technially isn't an occupation.
Did you even watch the video?
@@CritikillACClaimed He definitely didn’t watch the video lol.
People just comment what they think out of anger and emotion without listening to people’s arguments.
@@CritikillACClaimed This video has nothing with impartial view. As a documentary requires, you need to present neutral voices or give the same amount of time to palestinian speakers which is not the case. Perhaps this is not a good video.
@@CritikillACClaimed it is technically an occupation status !! According to a definition adopted and endorsed by many organizations, When people are ruled by an entity without benefiting from the belonging status of that entity, in this case israeli citizenship, it is technically considered as an occupation,
And therefore Israel is an occupying power.
Good video, but very, VERY biast
I am wondering when they will make a Lebanon war video
are you referring to the civil war or something else ? .there was a time when there was a train line from Haifa to Beirut , so the idea that Israel was always at war with Lebanon is a myth
The one where Israel realized they were no where near as strong as they thought they were. They were defeated by a militia hahahaha
@@osairqable actually, Israel won both.
@@fanOmry israel won nothing. The pro-israel christian millitia they were sponsoring got beaten by the druze and syrians and israel got kicked out of the south by Hezbollah. The war ended with the Taïf agreement where “mandate” of lebanon was taken from israel and given to syria and israel’s lebanese allies lost all their power and their weapons were confiscated
@@kl6544
Not true...
I mean...
Where to start...
Israel left Lebanon due to internal politics.
*Which were sponsored by outside entities.*
Honestly in any other countries the leaders of those Orgs would have been jailed at the least. The Paper trail isn't even secret.
Whatever. This wasn't the Israeli 'Nam.
It is what Russia was accused of in the Trump elections.
Now...
South.
That was again, an Israeli one sided act.
An act of misguided compassion. Had they used it to build their own... Rather as an attack start point, Israel would have left Judea, Samaria and Benjamine.-West bank to you.
As it is, Israel is too nice to actually go back in.
*and* continue to provide Gaza with Water and Power..
Among many things.
And unless they get too annoying, go in to basically nothing more than take them down a pegg. But never actually reannex it.
Because again, Too Nice.
I forgot the rest of your drivel and don't actually care enough to reread.
U can not be an occupier if it is your land . This is Israel and that is it . Rome was the first to call this place Palestine . The Israelis were there long before making them the only true Palestinians .
AS I understand, Judea and Samaria are the birthplace of the Jewish people. Why is it that the West Bank was allocated to the Palestinians by the United Nations? Israel won the war, they are not occupying power. They just exercised what belongs to them. A State of Israel must be formed with the Israelis and Palestinians, with two-people in one state (but not a Jewish State) , with Constitution and By-laws to be followed by both people. Like the American Civil War, the North won the war but now it's the United State of America with strong Constitution and By-Laws. That's my opinion only. Let there be peace in Israel and the world.
@Shayne Meidle True!
doesnt matter if that the birth place of fcking ancestors thats not how things work france attacked nazis, nazis got paris that doesnt means paris is nazi capital. right to conquest doesnt exists anymore doesnt matter if you won that in a war now jew will accept israel as a non jewsih state and palestanians wont forgot thier nationality
Many people live in many places we all are originated from africa. 3000 years is a lot nobody brings up those things and creates a state
@@stfup9360 Problem is most people have a country. Chinese people might be from Africa, but they have China, the French might be from Africa, but they have France. Mexicans might be from Africa, but they have Mexico. The Jews didn't have a country of their own since theirs was destroyed 2000 years ago. If they wanted their own country, where would you put it, if not in the only place where they are known to originate from? What land to they have a stronger claim to than this one?
Unless of course the argument is that the Jews are the only people in the world who have no right to a county of their own at all and no claim to any land at all, which is an argument many people certainly make...
2 years late with the answer, but i believe the 1947 partition plan was based on the demographic of the land at the time, to reduce the amount of people that would have to be displaced in order to live under their preferred sovereignty. There were a lot more Arabs then Jews in the West Bank, as the Jews mostly got land north and west of it.
They’ve been at war since the beginning of 3 new eras I don’t believe it’ll ever be resolved unless you take away the factions just be one powerful force of people instead of half of one with two
The simple answer is that there is not one. The Ottoman Empire declared they had no claim after WW1. The British walked away from the mandate in 1948. Jordan abandoned its claim with the Oslo accord.
The situation is unprecedented. Nowhere else is there a piece of land that has not been legally part of any existing country. So all the existing labels do not apply and all the standard international treaties do not work.
The closest is the treaty made between the most interested parties. The PA and Israel. An agreement endorsed by the major powers.
After all, everything we call international law is actually multilateral agreements. The is no super legislative body that implements it. The UN etc can only manage what the parties have agreed amongst themselves and cannot involve parties who never signed up in the first place
@@AhmadTheGoat There was no "Palestinians" as an Arab people then. Before 1948, when people talked about Palestinians, they ment Jews who lived in The Mandate For Palestine.He and many other prominent Zionist leaders talked about the Arabs of the land and their integration in the new Jewish state . For example: the prime-minister will always be ether Arabor a Jew, intermediate each election.
@@AhmadTheGoat could you give an example of the Israeli government ethnically cleansing Palestinians? I am aware of an Arab village or 2 being forcibly relocated during the 1948 war, but that’s all I’m aware of.
@@AhmadTheGoat he does not mention the "p" people because no such nationality ever existed (or ever will).
@@shaifridrich3349 The UN calls it occupation. Land acquired during wars is occupied land. After 1945 all UN member states are required to follow the UN charter and international law. If there is a dispute countries can refer to the ICJ. ICJ has ruled the west bank, Gaza and Jerusalem are occupied lands. Israel has yet to appeal the decision.
A major sign of ethnic cleansing or genocide is a notable decrease on a population. The Palestinian population in Gaza, Judea, and Samaria has increased (even with the murders of PA members by Hamas in Gaza and the PA' occasional assassination of dissidents in Judea and Semaria).
There is no ethnic cleansing done by Israel.
However, take the popular Palestinian chant, "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" calls for the total destruction of Israel and her inhabitants.
No
It's the God's will for mainly all the Jews to be gathered in the promised land / Palestine 🇵🇸
Was Jordan an occupying power 1948-67? Yes it was. Then the land was LIBERATED by Israel as a result of the war they did not start. British mandate was meant for reconstituting of Jewish home, French mandate was meant for Arab countries. Enough wars and terrorism already! Leave single Jewish state alone.
No it wasn't
As an algerian I can say that Isreal is a occupation power
If we walked with the point that ur religion give u the land or u live ther before so we can say Kenya can get all the world
Israel is a occupation power
British make it easy to make the state o Isreal and hard to the Palestinian to make Palestine
@@ahmahm6499 forget about religion, walk with international law. After the fall of Ottoman empire, the land was divided between all who claimed a piece. Geographic area Palestine was given to the Jews (later 3/4 were cut off and given to Arabs to create Jordan, and Jews agreed). French mandate was given to Arabs. There was no independent Arab state from present Arab League existing in the area before San Remo international conference. If you question legality of Israel, you then question legality of Lebanon, or Iraq... If you dont- then you are biased and ignorant (thats best case scenario). Try to learn history from different sources, you might be able to analyze and fire your Algerian history teacher. 😉 oh, an advice: dont comment if you dont know the subject. Not a good look.
Israel is an occupying force. A lot of things happened in two 2,000 years, it is not as if the Romans decided to expell the Jewish people yesterday. If is true that the Palestinians at first did no accept Israel but the Palestinian accepted the existence of Israel in the accords of Camp David. No argument can justify the settlements, the demolition and expropriation of Palestinian property. An addition the Palestinian people encounter all kinds of obstacles in daily living, one example is that only 3% of building permits are approved for Palestinians. The Romans committed a grave deed by expelling the Jewish people from their own land but this land was not empty for 2000 years, somebody always lived there. The two state solution would be the only fair solution but it does not look like this is possible now.
🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱❤❤🇨🇦😍👍
Israel have Right To Exist. God give them the land Give them forever by god himself
I don’t believe Israel take the land from Arab the End Israel gone win because GOG Of. Israel
Wooooow. So much confusion, omission and misinformation. You've set a new low.
It’s an eight minute video. What are specific examples?
What do you mean sharing my home with a thief who stole stuff from my home ? And what?! That house I own belongs to the thief 3000 years ago ? And now all my house is taken away from me by force under gun threat? Wait what the thief got the right to defend himself and if I fight back I become the bad guy ?
Okay enough none sense and let's face it , don't tell me about history 3000 years ago or 100000 , talk to ke about the last 100 years only, where were "Israel" ? Hypernating in Europe countries and woke up remembering they own a land all the sudden ?
What if I tell you that Torah the hopy book of Jewish people itself mentioning the Jews GOT NO LANDS! and it's meant for them to exist among all nations including Muslims countries, easy come easy go , it's just not yet Mr. Moral occupation! Nothing last for ever and revise history, for once the Nazies thought the can capture the world ...
6:37 israel never regcognized jordans annexation of west bank so jordans giving up west bank doesnt mean palestanian also did
@@Abilliph palestine always existed from 2nd century ( kingdom of isreal god dommed in 720 bc and it was smaller then present isreal))) this name was given by romans . this and why arabs don't have a claim .. cause 3000 years back their fcking ancestors of isrealis used to live there arabs / Muslims were majority in that are for 1300 years until europeans came and west bank was given to Palestine by un .. gods promise , my fcking ancestors used to live there doesn't matters no place in earth was inhabited by one group and moreover west bank was a part of egypian empire 5000 years back so from no sense you can cut of arab conection
@@Abilliph who care how isreal views I international recognition matter and also law does
@@Abilliph muslims werent majoriy for a while its 1300 years and consistently jews are majority in isreal but not in palestine even if you count 700000 jacobs still not there is supposed and should be state of arab population they call it Palestine or Arab land its their choice and colonization, going to a war and winning land is not a 21st or 20 th century thing empires , age of colonization is over and jews did won this land by king david in 1030 bc
@@Abilliph international law is the reason Israel seat down to negotiation yeah i know still international law is a joke but recognition still matter a lot is now the world community recognizes west bank a part of Israel that's an end of a Palestinian state. and the reson palestine doesnt accept is Jerusalem the jerusalem should be shared even if palestanians get 10 % they still accept it no way palestanins would leave the al aqsa mosque .. divison of jerusalem can be done respectecting both jews and muslims or isrealis and palestanians . jerusalem is very senstive and abu dis is no jerusalem and it palestanians dont get at least a small part of jerusalem there is nothing left that they can ask for
@@Abilliph the green line comes under un partition plan of 1947 thats why should be a part of palestine if not palestine no way isreal can annex any part of thtat area
The state of Israel was forced on the Palestinians by the Balfour Declaration and then the UN (under American influence) .
Jews and Palestinians are living with irresponsible British policy from WW1. Britain offered a Jewish National Home for the wrong reasons. No planning, no consideration of the indigenous population.
Favour has always been given to Israel in terms of land, military support and setting up the state. Check the wording of the Balfour Declaration and League of Nations Mandate. Israeli has always had superpower sponsorship. Jewish historians like Tom Segev have provided evidence US and Israeli's knew Egypt was not going to attack in 1967. It was not therefore a war for security, US intervention provided this.
The main problem is government supported sponsorship and funding of settlements. This prevents both peace and a Palestinian state. Laws in Israel have been made to legalise expulsion of Palestinians and Arab dissent is suppressed. Palestinians are not granted land or a tiny amount.
This is well documented by Jewish and non-Jewish journalists. Goliath by Max Blumenthal documents this comprehensively
The reality of Israel's birth cannot be hidden. A full, comprehensive history of the War of Independence clearly shows ethnic cleansing and war crimes. Israeli soldiers openly admit it.
Israel's occupied territories are wrecking its reputation worldwide.
The West Bank is occupied though. This isn’t an ethics question, this is just a fact of international law.
Agreed. This video is total Zionist propaganda. Also, legally speaking, the West Bank is an Apartheid state. The Jewish settlers who live there have Israeli citizenship and all the rights and power that comes from that whereas the Palestinians don't. Israeli settlers frequently destroy Palestinian property in the West Bank and receive minimal if any punishment from the Israeli government. The IDF forces Palestinians to go through checkpoints all over the West Bank just to get from place to place because it involves getting through Jewish settlements, which popped up after 1967. If Israel just never allowed settlers there, this wouldn't have become such a big problem. I'm not saying acts of terrorism against civilians are justified, but they occur on both sides and the best way to avoid the danger is for Israelis to just stay out of the West Bank.
Law is always open to interpretation. Considering the annexation of the West Bank by Jordan, the conquest of it by Israel in a defensive war, and the fact that the Palestinians never technically established a state, or agreed to borders, that could then be occupied, it gets really messy...
6 million Palestinian refugees not granted right to return despite Israel having to promise this to join the UN. A promise it broke immediately.
The problem is the British made conflicting promises to Jews and Arabs during World War I . The Israeli presence in the West Bank is relatively benign. If you’re a religious minority, where would you prefer to be Israel or Arab world?
@Ken Brownsher 👍
The state of Palestine was created in 1988.
All land conquered by Israel in defensive wars prior 1988, including the wars of 1948 and 1967, cannot be considered to be occupied since the political entity claiming to have its land occupied did not even exists yet.
@@mager888 yeah, funny thing about palestinian coins from 1927 is that It's written 'erets israel' on it, meaning 'Land of israel'.
As for stamps, so what ? It doesnt take an sovereign state of palestine to make stamps.
As for the palestine of the bible, the actual hebrew word is 'pelishtim', meaning 'invader' because they invaded the kingdom of israel and were pagans, and this long extinct people was the sworn ennemies of israel, and as i just said, went extinct thousands of tears ago.
Most of modern so called palestinian refugies came to judea and samaria at the turn of the 20th century, and are not the thousand years old people your propaganda would have us believe.
This is history, you can call it lies, but it only makes you pathetic.
Have the strenght to admit the truth : this land belongs to israel, always has and always will .
Occupying terrorists in Palestine....the hate groups came from Europe and America mostly
Illegal settler militant groups, practicing acts of terror
@@mager888 The "Palestinian" coins, bills and stamps were not issued by a country called Palestine, they were issued by the British under the Mandate of Palestine. The currency was issued by the Anglo-Palestine Bank, which today is Bank Leumi. Everything that says Palestine on it in. an official capacity from 1922 - 1948 was issued by the British Mandate of Palestine.
I think it’s so easily forgotten that Israel doesn’t like the current situation either or that they didn’t ask for it. When the government makes decisions regarding the Palestinian people and Gaza/West Bank it’s not a multiple choice question with great options and one correct answer. Like building the security wall. I’m not the biggest fan of it, but how can I judge the Israeli government for picking that option when it secured the safety of its people. There were 30-60 suicide bombing’s, kidnappings, etc. committed against Israeli civilians yearly leading up to the building of it.
Expanding illegal settlements is them asking for continued conflict
@@osairqable But when they weren’t expanding “settlements” the conflict continued
@@Drinkingyoursaltytearsallah It certainly has been a can of worms. I care less about the legality and more about the morality regarding "settlements". There are prominent Jewish cultural and spiritual sites in the West Bank. Should the descendants of the people that built those not be allowed to live near them? In their ancestral homeland. Native peoples in the USA and other places were forcibly removed from their ancestral lands to reservations. If they wanted to move back and build houses where their ancestors lived and where their culture developed, wouldn't it be morally wrong to tell them that they couldn't?
jordan cohen which begs the question Israel would resort to a one state solution.
Extend citizenship to Palestinians living in East Jerusalem and the West Bank.
@@francishallare204 Are you asking me if that is a solution? It could be.
It is all about the golden rule the man with the gold rules 3:37 3:37 3:37
Propaganda
Israels borders were established by the 1922 League of nations mandate. So all the land from mediterranean sea to the jordan river is legally israel. The jordanian invasion of judea and samaria and subsequent ethnic cleansing of Jews was an illegal act. Same as egypt invading israel and artificially creating "Gaza Strip" (never historically existed)
The only part of Israel you can say is "occupied" is the Golan Heights but thats because Syria used it to shell israeli villages intermittently. So they lost it in the 67 war.
“We have neither taken foreign land nor seized foreign property, but only the inheritance of our ancestors, which at one time had been unjustly taken by our enemies." Simon Thassi, 1 MACCABEES 15:33
Also terrorised your neighbours, arrested children and under investigation for war crimes.
🗽DO THE ARABS PRAY TO THE G OF ISRAEL AT THE DOME IN JEWRUSALEM OR NOT ?
Is there any ancient history of them so called "palestinian" ?
The bible mentions Philistine which modern translates to Palestine
@@ChickenVeggi no, the bible mentions the philistines, nothing called "philistine"
@@dcrafton3988 I don't see the difference. I don't think religion should play a role in deciding who gets what, our world is based on separation of church and state. But If you're Jews are the only one with religious claim to the land, that's not necessarily true
@@ChickenVeggi You should see the difference because the philistine people were greek not arabs invading the kingdom of israel and judea, and the reason its sounds similar is because after the romans distroyed judea in 133AD they renamed the land palestina to emberess jews that their land is named after their former enemey and the name stuck, btw the name philistine comes from the hebrew word polesh which means invader because the philistines invaded israel and the kingdom of judah
Yeah Judah in the Bible are not the Jewish people today!! This is insane!!
❤️❤️❤️ Israel ❤️❤️❤️
❤️❤️❤️ Jewish ❤️❤️❤️
By cancilung one piece
Trash nation won’t last
@@mewing9619 what you talking about?
You language is Zimbabwe style?😂
@@mewing9619 we’ll see about that 😏
@@kitabisa189 your racist good luck with that evil mentality
@@samgreen7334 Israel is not what it use to be, it’s becoming a far right apartheid style county those never last. Democracy is the most difficult but most moral and ethical. The US is having its own crisis as well.
Israel tried to give the West Bank back to Jordan, and they refused. Likewise Gaza to Egypt.
She literally has an Israeli flag behind her do you ppl really expect them to tell the truth? This is a biased channel and it's only aim is to pander to isrsrl
Everything she said in this video is based on facts and true events
The only land that is Isreal is the land granted to it in 1947.The argument that Isreal is a much bigger area given to trhem thousands of years ago is nonsense,if that was the case all the U S A would belong to the native Americans,over the last thousand years there have been huge movements of populations,the Franks or French came from eastern Europe a thousand years ago,the English came from Europe 1500 years ago and pushed the Britons into Wales and Ireland,alsoJewish people werte forced out of Spain 600 years ago so perhaps Spain should be part of Isreal according to the argument,also the Biblical argument that the land was given to Isreal by someone 4000 years ago,well whoever this person was he forgot to tell the Chinese and Indians and everyone else except someone called Moses who seems to have been the son of an Egyptian Pharoh.
Because when the land was split that way for 2 states the Arab nations refused to accept and declared war on Israel from all sides with the explicit intention of wiping the Jews off the map. This right on the heels of the Holocaust. Big surprise, Israel won that war and was less open to sharing after that. Especially since nonstop terror attacks have continued ever since (and long before).
That does`nt give isreal the right to occupy land that is`nt theirs,,it is against international law to settle your citizens in occupied territory,Isreal has signed up to the agreements on international law so should observe these laws they have signed up tyo.
And even the 1947 partition can be discussed. I'm not sure I agree with the Ottoman empire and later the UK deciding what to do with that land in the first place
@@Brix96 When Arab countries attack Israel, and lose in a fair war, territory. No one can come to Israel claiming that it is an illegal occupier
4:41 only now in modern times, it reached 3 million. In 67' it was 700,000, in 2005 it was 1.4 million
the actual reason that the Jewish population boosted is the Jewish Exodus from the middle east and north Africa,you can go and check what it really was
anyway for the sake of argument,only 30% of jews are ashkenazi else are other ethnicities
Long live the Jewish-druze state of Israel 🇮🇱✊🏾❤️🇧🇸
It not a war when one side is fighting and the other is trying to survive. America should. demand Israel stop this war and if they dont know more money, supplies, or weapon.
Israel finally seen for they racism there and in America
How can you leave a territory knowing that you'll be attacked from that territory the moment that your leave?
Israel must occupy whether or not it wants to.
Not true, the Israeli goverment have actually allready signed a peace treaty with the Palestinian Authority which is very stable regarding security.
Then don't occupy people's territories in the first place? Robbing someone then blackmailing them, peak comedy that is