Times in the Book of Daniel | Part 36

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @asherjason6270
    @asherjason6270 4 дні тому

    Thoughts on LuniSolar Calendar?

    • @thestudyofchristianity
      @thestudyofchristianity  4 дні тому

      Don’t know too much about this. I did go down a rabbit hole of Qumran and Solar Calendars though…made my head spin

    • @alexyoung5472
      @alexyoung5472 4 дні тому

      As per other thread here - the calendar used by ancient Israel as many other BC nations was a luni-solar one of 354 days + a non-Metonic system of intercalation of an additional month 3 times in 8 years. I should add that the aforementioned was an OBSERVATIONAL one where the new moon was reported for the start of the month. Under C4th AD Hillel II the rabbis readopted the lunisolar calendar using the Metonic system of 7 additional 30 day months every 19 years being a NON-OBSERVATIONAL system.

  • @cycribbs
    @cycribbs 4 дні тому

    Where you get 1,150 days? That's not what Daniel 8:14 says, it says $2,300 days

    • @nathanaelswayne8024
      @nathanaelswayne8024 4 дні тому +2

      I believe he answers it in the vid

    • @cycribbs
      @cycribbs 4 дні тому

      @nathanaelswayne8024 well he's wrong on that. Can you go back to Genesis, the first day was evening and morning, so there's 2,300 days, which could be literal years which would be 6.3 years, or 2300 years. The first part of the series I think he's spot on, but Rome took over the South and the North and the east and became the main beast of the world the two legs of iron. But was divided into 10 nations of the Western Roman empire. The razor of taxes, I don't believe that had anything to do with the solution or the telemedic empire, that was Rome. And he says I think it was verses 40 to 45 were unfulfilled that they are wrong, the Bible is not wrong, if you come to the conclusion that these things actually did not happen, and your thesis is wrong. I believe these are the kingdoms that will rise up just before his coming, as it says in Daniel 12:1, this is the resurrection of the saints at the end of time so why would Daniel completely skip over the Roman empire? And only focus on the seleucid empire. Pompeii came against Jerusalem also, that's not mentioned in this, and all I can tell you when he said that these were unfulfilled prophecies that Daniel I guess wrote them hundreds of years after His time was Nebuchadnezzar none of that's right. Daniel's prophecies are 100% accurate, you just have to interpret them accurately. I believe each one of these kingdoms, Daniel is mentioning in 11, at some point had dealings with Jerusalem, even in 70 AD

  • @alexyoung5472
    @alexyoung5472 4 дні тому

    As I have said in several comments in past videos the BC abomination of Daniel 8 and 11 of 2300 days of which the Temple was then cleansed is not the same abomination of Daniel 9 and 12 of which is 1290 days of profanation with a further 45 days until it is safe to return to Jerusalem albeit with the Temple being torn down. Jesus refers to the AD one. (edit out for review). The AD 1290 and 1335 days have nothing to do with Antiochus IV or the Seleucid period. If they did then the scholars and those who cite them make Christ a liar as He was pointing to something soon future (30 AD to 70 AD) that had already happened in the BC past. Be wary of Jewish and rabbinic fables who seek to denigrate Christ the Son of God.

    • @alexyoung5472
      @alexyoung5472 4 дні тому

      @@Thinktank00725 The calendar used by ancient Israel as many other BC nations was a luni-solar one of 354 days + a non-Metonic system of intercalation of an additional month 3 times in 8 years. There is zero evidence of a Zadok 364 day calendar system until the mid-late rabbinic AD Tannaim period. The Enochian and Qumranic and the book of Jubilees are based on the hybrid chronology of the not BC but AD Samaritan Pentateuch of Flood date 1307 AM as it contains MT pre-Flood short begat ages of the Patriarchs before the Flood and LXX long begat ages of the Patriarchs after the Flood. DSS deposition continued well up to the C4th AD.
      Such hybridized text of the SP cannot occur until the C2nd AD when the rabbis shortened both pre and post Flood begat ages for the C2nd AD proto-MT. The Zadok calendar of 360 days + 4 days (364 days) is a false premise that there was an 360 day calendar from Genesis in that the first five months of the Flood was 150 days. Now that was an arrangement of months of (30,30,30,30,30....) but that doesnt mean the year was all composed of 12 months of 30 days. 360 day advocates making this assumption then add 4 days to become a 364 day calendar which still does not align with the solar year. Neither the 360 or 364 calendar system have a true process of additional intercalation of either 5 days or 1 day to align with the solar year.
      The problem also with 1260 days being 3.5 years of Jesus ministry and 3.5 days + 45 days to Pentecost is that Jesus referred to Daniel 9 and 12 AD abomination or profanation of the Temple which did NOT occur at any time up to that first Christian Pentecost. Note the abomination STARTS the count of both 1290 days (which you want as the start of Jesus ministry) and 1335 days 45 days later. Sorry TT00725 but I must reject such a belief as it has no foundation in Scripture. Remember the AD abomination of Daniel 9 and 12 occurs AFTER Christ as the Temple was not profaned until 66 AD - then the count starts.

  • @bartholomewnathaniel807
    @bartholomewnathaniel807 4 дні тому

    I've commented on some of your Daniel video's but here in chap. 12.- re: days of- 1260 / 1290 / 1335 here your really-'off' BT! I say this because the chapter 12 emphasizes- 'At the time of the End'; and here it Has To Be the- Second half of Dan.9.27 as Michael himself prophesied - The Seventy Wks- so he- Michael comes back here in chap. 12.1- as he is for "Israel" (Here you should read Hosea 1.- !) Yet Daniel 12.7 has now Gabriel declaring the Time element of 1260 days as we also see repeated in Rev.10.- for Rev. 11.2 repeats the 42 months or 1260 'days'! RE Scriptural integrity- YAHWEH makes sure His WORD does 'get through' to these End Times (Enough!) where things indeed are- 'As Written' and thereby No man i.e Miller & his Jehovah Witness's "Guess" and taking things & chapters Out Of Context will stand and- so it is! Thereby we ALL are STUCK with these Three dates of- 1260 / 1290 / 1335 days to figure out and Rightly Divide- just like ALL Scripture!

    • @alexyoung5472
      @alexyoung5472 4 дні тому

      I agree. Google RRBS Article 1 - The 1290 and 1335 days of Daniel 12 Revealed According to the LXX A - Codex Alexandrinus. The 1260 days would fit into the 1290 days. i.e. the two witnesses start prophesying the same day as the abomination in 66 AD starts. From memory Josephus mentions one of the two who prophesying killed by a stone probably likely also around the time during the war when the Roman tower fell due to an earthquake.
      The article however deals with Daniel 12:11, 12 and notes the word anasi from the C4th AD LXX A not present in newer texts. Also the 70th Week ends with Stephen in 33/34 AD (covenant confirmed for 1 week by Christ who dies and rises mid week/ then second half of the 70th week is Disciples in Jerusalem to Acts 7). Daniel 9:27b includes also the time from the 70th Week to the consummation/time of the end/power of the holy people taken away is all same language for end of the war in 70 AD. Christ's death and resurrection ended the spiritual aspects of the Temple sacrificial system and 40 years later (within a generation then still living) the physical Temple went to.

    • @bartholomewnathaniel807
      @bartholomewnathaniel807 4 дні тому

      @@alexyoung5472 Yess- we ALL are getting closer daily now to the full revealing of Daniel to Revelation as the 1260 'days' in Dan.12.- are the Repeated in Revelation- again and again! Personally, I see 'Christendom' overall today as where- the Pharasee's and Sadducce's of Messiah's time were (In 'bed with The World!) Thereby do Not expect much from The Churches, indeed, Bullinger writes re: Revelation 2.- & 3.- 'When all the churches had failed"- by John's time of writing Revelation. Thereby Messiah essentially address's these chapters to Not The Churches but- The Ekklesia or 'called out ones'- that;s Individuals to 'Hear what The Spirit says'! Hey, its all about believing that (Not God!) but YAHWEH will honor ALL His promises 'in Messiah'' Yehoshua or Yeshua of which both mean- YAHWEH's Salvation- and literally is Messiah's actual name! Note Only (Rev.3.7 Phile. receives No condemnation 'as they have Not denied his name'!!!!!)