How America's left is preparing for escalating violence | DW News
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 тра 2023
- There are fears that a polarizing election will further inflame the culture war in the US. This week the Department of Homeland Security warned of a rise in right-wing terrorism -- the potential targets including the LGBTQ community as well as racial and ethnic minorities. While the debate over gun controls remains deadlocked in Washington, some say the best protection for “vulnerable groups" is to give them guns as well.
The Socialist Rifle Association’s answer to gun violence in the US is to arm “vulnerable populations” - meaning Black communities, LGBT people, and women. Through firearms training and advocacy, they hope to “take back the monopoly on gun ownership” from the right wing. I’ve interviewed them at an outreach event, and filmed with them at a shooting range as well as a first-aid training. At a public outreach event in a Washington D.C. park, the Socialist Rifle Association finds an audience for its message that there’s an arms race in this country whether you like it or not, and the right-wing is winning by a long shot.
Subscribe: ua-cam.com/users/deutsche...
For more news go to: www.dw.com/en/
Follow DW on social media:
►Facebook: / deutschewellenews
►Twitter: / dwnews
►Instagram: / dwnews
►Twitch: / dwnews_hangout
Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: / dwdeutsch
#militarisation #culturewars #USmilitias
Congrats to Smith & Wesson for winning the culture war!
Two of the whitest men of all time.
epic ☠
And the various AR-15 type manufacturers
We’re already winning it
@@Socialist1919lmfao!😅😅😅😅
There are a lot more left leaning folks with firearms than y'all think, they just don't wrap their whole personalities around it.
Personalities? 😂
Good luck with that,
That won’t help you.
@@very7962 we out number the fascist right and are smarter.
No, they usually are wrapping their lips around each others weiners.
@@timlinator You fascist left think you are smarter but you don't even know what a woman is!
2A means everyone has right to bear arms to protect themselves….2A is not just a “Right-wing” right.
exactly. and it's more of a duty to the people of the nation than a right too.
Bingo
"well regulated" btw, your not a militia
@@ClaytonMileto "Well regulated" back then means well trained.
@@mysteryman3666 what did militia mean back then ?
If you havent heard the joke already... One person said during a debate, "I am a liberal, words are my weapons", to which someone replied, "I am a leftist, weapons are my weapons".
And a third person said: "I am an American; votes are my weapons."
Kyle rittenhouse took out 3 leftists by himself
@@SchmuelGoldstein-mj8rk He did. The right are well ahead of the armament race, but the left are catching up. Reminds me of the lead up to WW2. Fascist vs. Commies, I wonder which side Rittenhouse would back.
As the people and democracies of Europe painfully discovered near the middle of the 20th century, weapons were effectively the closest thing to their words.
@@SchmuelGoldstein-mj8rk correction, an armed individual took out three uncoordinated, unprepared and unarmed individuals by himself (and his gun). Most people are capable of that.
I really can't help but feel that the US is spiraling towards escalated civil conflict.
Good. Down with the papist republic!
I feel it my friends feel it my sibling feels it besides my parents
Nah we aren't really there yet, there would be alot more open violence, compared to other countries who underwent such a thing we're pretty tame at the moment
@@riclate2013 I mean we are further along than we were 10 years ago I feel.
The right had been advocating for a civil war for roughly a decade now.
Educate and arm yourselves. Walk in peace, don’t seek conflict. Stay alive.
"How America's left is preparing for escalating violence" You left out THAT THEY ARE ADVOCATING.
Being full blooded Navajo. Don't depend on anyone to protect you. If protection is still available then use that right to your full advantage. You'll feel alot better.
I can't endorse violence but we all have the right to self-defense.
Gee maybe that's why people defend 2A.
Oh yes. they're stringing up perverts all over place
everyone is defending from each others self defense
Yeah, how about you take guns out of that equation?
And you believe guns in the hands of civilians does that?
US and guns. Lol
I think the idea that it’s better to have a gun and not need one then needing a gun and not have one is the mentality of a lot of us Americans.
and is a symptom of a profoundly damaged society.
And makes no sense.
@@jimmoynahan9910easy enough to say when you're not in a situation where you need and don't have.
@@howardj602 That’s true, but we haven’t had a world war since mad either. My personal opinion is that the mad situation is a lot more dangerous than guns in America. Realistically, if we have a nuclear war then a huge percentage of people will be gone within 6 months anyway. From that point of view it’s difficult to see the advantage of being armless in those circumstances.
@@jimmoynahan9910 It makes perfect sense to a logical person. Trust in yourself first. You are truly the only person that can protect what matters to you.
i wish i could tell this to my mother, but she just hates, hates, HATES guns. even the idea of owning a simple hand gun is grotesque to her, even if it WERE to be for self-defense and take routine courses to keep up-to-date on responsible use.
even if we live in a liberal city in a liberal state with a liberal mayor and liberal governor, it's only a matter of time before all of that is yanked from under our feet.
Non-gun options are very important as well!
As an American and a Veteran of the Afghanistan War I hear more firefights in Baltimore then in Kandahar. I hear gunshots everynight almost, Its like living in a warzone... :(
Bro, you live near the capital. You are standing near an overspilling boiling pot and wondering why you get hot water on you.
I was once in a situation where there was no one else there to help me and having a firearm averted a confrontation with someone intent on doing me harm. It doesn't matter what could have happened, there's just what did happen which was nothing. We were both very lucky.
@@CraigScottFrost That's a bad example. A civilian wouldn't need to be armed in a courthouse the same way they might in other less secure places. There are law enforcement officers with guns and metal detectors and other measures to help keep people safe there. That's also true of other places like hospitals that now often have armed security staff and similar measures in place. Obviously civilians, even those licensed to conceal carry, aren't able to do so in every situation. But it's not an either/or option. Having access to a firearm when someone can do so legally can literally save their or someone else's life.
@@CraigScottFrost there may come a time where a violent or I’ll intending person may only understand the language of violence, or threat of it. Sometimes knowing the option is there could potentially be enough to diffuse such a situation. In order unfortunate cases, it’s an option you’ll be able to fall back on. You can learn CPR and still wish to never use, but still be forced to in order to save a life.
@@CraigScottFrost Uhh. I carry concealed literally everywhere I go. Gun free zone or not. If it has a sticker on the door, even more reason to carry. Haven’t had any problems.
The problem here in the US is not 'good guys defending themselves from bad guys'. The issue at hand is the random mass shootings. Time & again the wrong people are getting the wrong guns because of money & lax guns laws.
@@CraigScottFrostYou: you can't carry that that's illegal
Criminal: points gun at you
Pretty scary when two groups with completely opposite beliefs start to arm themselves and preach about an arms race...
It's called a pincer method it's used by governments when they want to destabilize a population the critical race Theory stuff is the same way you control the prison that's the real reason everybody gets all tatted up and stays inside their tribes most of them don't subscribe to the ideology at all however the guards require it whether they realize it or not there's entire power points out there on how you use this what do you think klicks or so popular in American High School there's no assortment of three-letter agencies that would love for a civil war to break out the conservatives would be disarmed first according to the FBI the hopes would be that they would retaliate so the military could be brought in the Democrats would cheer this on and as it always goes once they were no longer necessary would be executed in Mass the next ten years in this country are going to be lit
Maybe go buy a gun
This is good this is the way
It's the left Media pushing all that
Yeah, the second American civil war seems to actually be brewing
And just like the last one, most people will be forced to take sides even tho they’re indifferent
Why do I feel like America's heading to a Battle Royale?
I seriously question those stats that he provided at the very end. If I recall correctly, that Philadelphia study was filled with mostly criminals armed with firearms defending themselves from other criminals.
If you were five times more likely to die resisting with a firearm, there should be five times as many stories of concealed carry holders being killed as there are of concealed carry holders killing their attacker. But that isn't the case.
Let’s remember in the 30s you had fascist movements in the US, plus state and corporate repression against labor rights in the midst of mass poverty from the depression. State violence against trade unions and labor organization was a thing. The 60s also invovled resistance to a culture of lynching and massacres (see Tulsa as but one of a forgotten history).
Yes, and we are worried about Fascists returning to power. They don't start killing minorities and our guns just get used on range. We Protect Us
And don't forget Smedley Butler and the "business plot"
Lol, get a grip, your neo Marxist indoctrination is lame... Societies evolve, usually for the better, but the US is doing well considering the extreme level of diversity & immigration.
@@Sofi_-lc3cn You obviously aren't paying attention to what your own side is doing. The Left are always the Fascists.
@@Qingeaton yup. That was surpassed by the Powell Memo folk, the Koch Network and all the organizations the brothers architected to allow the rich to collaborate on a political war to kill the middle class and disable the republic. They have poured 100s of millions every year for a half century to reshape the US. We live in the result today.
This is how corrupt politicians destroy a country.
Well... We're the sheep gobbling up the "logic" they're dishing so technically this is how gullible and revolution-greedy voters destroy a country.
Care to elaborate?
This is how capitalists destroy a country.
@@jukebox5600 I think he's talking about how they consistently ignore the will of the majority of their voters and continue to do the bidding of the NRA in exchange for lavish campaign contributions.
@@combatepistemologist8382
Majority support gun owmership.
Democracy wins.😂
My money is still on the Right.
How can a child be non-binary
Not sure how i feel about those statistics you used at the end. Seems like those were about being armed vs a violent mugging or robbery situation. If its politicial violence like they are talking about, the shooter is already shooting to kill so dont feel that is applicable.
Im not for lax gun laws or anything, but America is just such a different place than Europe when it comes to firearms, i feel you might be missing some context through your lens. The cat is already long out the bag here lol, like the people interviewed said: theres a political arms race happening here whether you or I like it or not. Responsible ownership and stricter laws and proper training requirements should be the way forward, least imo. Disarming yourself when another side is arming to kill you is just naive, sadly 😔
We're talking about semi automatic weapons, largely. This is what they want to turn the screws on.
Ok Fudd
There isn't an arms race...at all. 😆
I fully encourage these LARPers to keep doing what they're doing, though: 2A is for everyone...even people who're definitely going to shoot themselves in the foot if their homeland ever has to call upon them to defend it. 🙄
Even in a situation of political violence, being armed makes you a priority target for the shooter..
Maybe you should beg the police like the children in Ulvade did
The problem with a gun is the same as a problem with pepper spray. People rarely attack others in ideal conditions for self-defense. The predator catches people off guard.
Until the predator becomes prey.
@@johnc3525 that require the prey to survive the ambush first. I recommend full body armor as the new fashion trend
@Bunseth Likyon brothas walking around in full plate 💀
True as that is, you don’t see mass shooters targeting Police Stations or Military bases, because they know they would be dead after the first 20 rounds.
You may be right. MAGA Republicans are probably now taking classes on how to shoot people in the back.
I'm saddened to see the impetus for training/owning firearms comes from such a purely political point, it is what it is, but it's very good to see fellow Americans having and training on firearms. This is collective security, and it's a very good thing. As well, firearm training and practice instills a respect for the weapon and its capability. We need more of this because security can never be truly outsourced. Truly, this is a good thing, and it's something that can bridge differences between both sides; this is a common ground. You'll find the most respectful people on earth at a gun range.
Completely agree, if more people were familiar with firearms and gun safety the accidental deaths would significantly go down.
Need to bring gun safety back to school curriculum atleast as an elective or something.
Right?? The more that are armed, the safer EVERYONE is. Imagine being a crook and not feeling safe on the west coast anymore. Or a tyrannical government and seeing this going on.
It doesn’t. This is just one story they are telling.
@@BusterHuggsSuch emaciated dissent. Tell your story, love.
@@BusinessWolf1 The US has 50% of the world's firearms. We are also the highest murder rate with guns.
Damn right, go far enough left and you get your guns back.
Yeah how many socialist countries respect gun rights?
I'll wait.
It is not a measure of health to be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society.
Better to be than not to be :P
Exactly. Dont be a sheep.
You always need to adjust to the society you live in. It will never be 100% the way you want it to be.
No matter if you live in texas, Shanghai or Copenhagen.
Of course it’s a much bigger burden to buy weapons to protect yourself against lunatics, than exchanging your car for public transport. While some people would argue opposing.
The pace of change in communication, science, industry & IT, (geo)politics, education, arts, gender and sexuality, beliefs, traditions etc. is very challenging for society. Reactionary movements and tensions always rise in such a context.
After 1945 every single year human culture has become even more dominant on the blue planet, every year has added new capabilities, knowledge, products and wealth, cultural artifacts, every year the scope of activities grows. If things go wrong, there's nobody else to blame - there's no outside predator or alien species threatening this incredible success story.
Fortunately, the vast majority of people are guided by reason, want dialogue, moderation and deescalation. In a liberal country everybody should be able to find a way of life that suits them, respecting other life choices that contribute to the explorative power, adaptability and richness of a culture.
@@fr3ddyfr3sh You only need to adjust to a certain extent. You can live on the edge of society as much as possible. And you can also try to have a good influence of society, trying to change it.
Like I said, dont be a sheep, go your own way.
As a US citizen our supreme court has ruled that the police do not have to respond to a situation that is dangerous. In the US a gun is used to prevent a crime over 700 times per day. That is according to DOJ statistics.
Have you got a link to that? I am not seeing any DOJ (or .gov) site making a claim even remotely like that.
False claim. Russian Disinformation Troll Farms are alive and well
@@WhatIsTheWheel you have been under a rock this was a supreme court ruling last summer. God I swear nobody knows anything anymore
My comment was directed at wrekced's claim, "In the US a gun is used to prevent a crime over 700 times per day. That is according to DOJ", That is why I wrote I did not see a DOJ site making that claim.
As far as "Duty to protect", it goes back way farther than last summer. One of the earliest was a DC court opinion in 1981, and a Supreme Court decision in 2005.
@@WhatIsTheWheel town of castle rock v Gonzales is one example
Hearing the father of a trans kid talk about how afraid he is for the safety of his child broke my heart. I understand why he would feel that he needs a gun. Statistics show that he’s mistaken about the idea that having a gun will make his child safer. That’s easy for me to say though. If I were in his position I might make the same mistake.
We need less hate in this country. Not more guns.
Given the hate isn't going away, the guns might actually serve as effective deterrence.
The guy interviewed said that more guns doesn’t mean less crime, but it indeed DOES as pointed out in the book “MORE GUNS, LESS CRIME” by John R. Lott, Jr. and he gives ALL of the statistics that show the more law abiding citizens are in ownership of guns, the less crime you will have in that particular area. This book alone debunks everything he said.
This is not going to end well ... over all.. for everyone 😢
It'll be fine.
Our trajectory is set ....there is no stopping it now ...
And most of the world will be actually cheering on ... The "bully" busy tearing itself apart is a a salute for large and medium world powers
Exactly
IT ALREADY ENDED WELL, APRIL 9 1865
I support this, people like this should be armed for their own protection. And its not a good guy vs bad guy with a gun, its about a guy living in a country with more gun than people, and those guns are owned by the people who dont want you to exsist
Exactly!
Majority of homicides are committed by your inner city constituents.
Source: FBI Uniform Crime Report
Subjective bias ....
Lol people like this are mentally ill, they should be institutionalized, not armed.
Your weak physiognomy is showing
You sont seem to understand that the LGBTQIA have been serving in the military and have owned weapons this whole time they just dont have to act like its the only thing in their lives
This is why I say they just don't get it. Nobody is telling them not to be who they are. What the issue is has to do with forcing others to adopt your values. If you are gay..... guess what... don't be offended when I call you gay. Don't say "I'm proud to ge gay", then freak out when some one says you're gay.
Numerous states in the united states have attempted and are still pushing to make the identity of transgender inherently s*xual, meaning that a trans person in public could be tried for indecency, and every trans individual working with children, such as in healthcare or education, will be marked and sentenced as s*x offenders and predators. Laws that would criminalize allowing your child to access appropriate gender-affirming care are making their way through the legislature. Properly gendering trans students has been outlawed in some states, and most still do not allow individuals to choose which bathroom they use. Their books, either written by or educating on the topic of LGBTQ individuals, have been systematically banned from many libraries. Even in some of the most left-leaning countries in the world, there are still right-wing political parties that want to remove the right for LGBTQ people to raise children. Russia has banned gender transitions in totality. The Vatican has equated gender affirming care to human trafficking.
"Concerning nonviolence: it is criminal to teach a man not to defend himself when he is the constant victim of brutal attacks. It is legal and lawful to own a shotgun or a rifle. We believe in obeying the law.
In areas where our people are the constant victims of brutality, and the government seems unable or unwilling to protect them, we should form rifle clubs that can be used to defend our lives and our property in times of emergency.....
If the government thinks I am wrong for saying this, then let the government start doing its job."
Malcolm X
Yeah - and how'd that work for Malcolm in the end? HE WAS SHOT DEAD.
@@citylumberjack9169 hymc
@@citylumberjack9169 shot dead by a state assassination squad that would have left the KGB proud.
ironic, the moment the actual victims of tyrannical goverment policies in the USA wanted to use their supposed rights to defend themself against said goverment using guns, the Reagan administration and the NRA suddenly went full support for gun control. weird how that coincided, right?
The fact that people in the media are shocked that marginalized communities don't feel protected by the authorities has got me like ?????????
Please wake up
It’s because people like you are weaponizing hate towards them. You are marginalized.
Most Western countries do a better job at it
That was such a weird remark by the host. I don't own a gun but it has nothing to do with feeling protected by the authorities. It has everything to do with the fact that criminals in my country usually don't have access to guns.
Well for starters this marginalized community doesn’t do drive bys or shoot cops as far as i know so….. 😅
@Bill Randleman You're correct in the sense that their real job is to protect capital/the wealthy. Which is why its even more ridiculous that the media is shocked about this situation.
Your use of the word "obligation" leaves a lot to be unpacked but I don't care to have that conversation
More guns doesn’t mean things are safer, unless half of them are pointed at you.
No war but class war
💪✋💭 While promoting non-violence is essential, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent right to self-defense. The line between self-defense and violence can be subjective and debated. Understanding the complexities surrounding this topic sparks curiosity about how individuals and societies define and navigate the concept of self-defense in different circumstances. It invites discussions on finding peaceful resolutions while ensuring personal safety and protection.
Most of the modern world have very restricted gun laws, yet we have way lower crime rates, and especially gun wound. Wake up america, we are not in the imperial age anymore, no matter how hard you want to let it be
The Left doesn't want a peaceful resolution.
True more people, especially moderates should read, Peter Gelderloos
I think ChatGPT wrote this comment
@Samuel Antonov
Chatgpt uses emojis?
I don't think so.
One side wants to exterminate, the other just wants to live in peace. The idea of being safer as a defenseless sheep to the slaughter is pure nonsense.
Thats true. Communists want to take your stuff and kill you and molest your kids.
Talk softly but carry a big stick. They actively talk about killing us, but then get mad when we arm ourselves.
We all know which side wants to exterminate
The Left will try to exterminate everyone else the rest of us must be able to stop these genocidal terrorists.
Bullsht
you cant outlive one group if yours does not reproduce or have children sorry
Who says leftists don't have children?
This is such a huge lie about trans people.
"I'm sorry, mom. Mom. I didn't, I didn't mean...oooagh!! I didn't mean to, mom."
Why can't people just leave each other alone, no one is saying you gotta talk to each other or be friends, just live and let live.
because while individuals can do that, politics are never done.
People are. These crazed leftwing psychos are gearing up to murder regular Americans who don't march lockstep with what they want. They think anywhere outside of blue cities are full of "fascists" that ride around in pickup trucks looking for marginalized people to murder.
Politicians will never allow that they live off division
Inner citie folk wont let it so people need to defend themselves like Kyle Rittenhouse did.
Because fascists and fascist leaning conservatives do not want certain groups in society to exists.
Bulletproof vests will be the new fashion in US. 😂😂
Hey, maybe it'll lead to some interesting designs. Vests for children, XXXL sizes, vests for pets, various colors, with a cup holder, with wi-fi and usb - the possibilities are endless
Maybe it helps to lose them a couple hundred pounds on average. Wearing some extra weights may count as minor sport and going out for their sugar packed food may be less prominent when there are bullets raining outside. 🤷🏻♂️
after being at 3 mass shootings i got my license to carry 😢
As I understand it a lot more tyrannys come from the Left/socialist sphere then from the Right/conservative sphere. Examples might be communism and nazism
Looking at the US from the outside, it almost seems like it's a country living in a completely different era than all of the other countries of the west. A different century almost. The US may not be at war with an outside nation like we see in Ukraine, but they are very much still at war with themselves. And I am skeptical that more guns = safer communities, regardless of agenda. If there were no guns at all than perhaps, but that's unlikely to ever occur because guns are sacred in the US for reasons I have yet to grasp. Again, that's something entirely unique to the US as far as western countries go.
USA: 300-million people - and 400-million guns. Many in the hands of untrained nut jobs!
Think of it like what happened in Bosnia.
One group is very aggressive. While the other is forced into a defensive role.
We didn't ask for this. We wanted to be in the same position as the rest of the Developed World. But we are constantly being persecuted for believing this.
Persecuted by hateful people. Who think they are never wrong. And somehow, everyone else is the one with the problem.
The Founding Fathers knew that an armed populace keeps a Republic free...!!!
This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern, both to the press and to the president. Two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. The need for far greater public information. The need for far greater official secrecy. The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society. We are as a people inherently and historicaly opposed to secret societies to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweigh the dangers which are sighted to justify it. Even today there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. There is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment.
John F. Kennedy
April 27, 1961
Speech to the National Press Association
If you actually visited here its a lot different. I have started to just step away from a lot of this because it gets tiring. Everyday is just pretty normal. Nothing bad happens like everything I see on TV or online. Call it ignorance but only negative stuff is sales on TV and the internet. Much more mundane and positive stuff on life here. Also if you avoid areas that are just known to have issues like major cities and the west coast.
I realize I see all this negative stuff about the US and would get really heated. But in real life there is none of that. At least for me. Media just makes everything more negative because that's what sales.
The US civil war - brought to you and supported by social media!
Well, to be sure, with "The Southern Strategy" and "The Powell Memo" Republicans and corporate DNC Democrats were working on it long before social media was a thing.
Facts
@@nsbd90now social media has accelerated it big time
Democrats will lose again.
2:05, I don't blame him for feeling that way. the far right must be stopped
If beer cant bring people together, firearms can.
Wb orange juice?
"Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary." - Marx
Yep, this is a core part of leftist ideology, definitely not something new like this journalist sort of suggests. Also, funny story, Ive seen that quote attributed (multiple times) to reagan and spread amongst right wing chuds and I always get a chuckle.
@@Casperski1312 marxism is not common in the us , the leftb there is socialy liberal and centrist on the economy
@@gabrielmenezes2761 Yeah, Im clear on that, I live in the US. Really, when I say "leftist", I'm specifically referring to the traditional idea of a leftist rather than someone on the left of the spectrum in the US. There are two very different "lefts" in the US: liberals and actual leftists. Liberals are typically capitalists of some flavor or another and are barely left in anything more than name, so Im not really talking about them when I use the term "leftist". That being said, I think you'd be surprised how the number of actual leftists has swelled here in the last decade or so. Its all thanks to wide and unfettered access to the internet and a worsening economy, I think. We're still a minority, but not nearly as much as we were in, say, the McCarthy era.
@@Casperski1312 this ^^
@@Casperski1312 Our numbers are not known because not all of us are broadcasting our beliefs. Some of us keep our heads down, work our jobs, and silently prepare for the worst. I love it when right-wingers are overconfident
The move from culture war to actual civil war. 'Murica.
Its a fun topic for Europe and the commonwealth, almost like talking about the royals
That wouldn’t end well for the lefties.
@@smeagle3295 Depends on how many of them will get guns. ;-)
@@billcarson818 That won’t matter. They are in antifa sniffing each others farts. I have yet to meet a veteran that is on board with them (myself included).
Wouldn't be the first time. We've survived the organized violence of the Civil War, the anarcho-communist insurrection, and the Civil Rights Movement. And each time the more humanist side made gains over the self-interested idealists.
What next ?
A pride walk with guns in hand ?
Taking your protection into your own hands is not disheartening, it’s extremely responsible.
I just came back after living in the Philippines for 5 years. I had cctv at my house, police were there strictly to enforce (not patrol), and it is perfectly acceptable for the responsibility of self defense fall on the individual. Police there are to catch the criminal, not stop the criminal.
Especially being trapped in a hotel room while irrate individuals are knocking on your door and it will be 26- minutes before authorities arrive.
@@spencertwoeightyz3383 There's a saying I heard that sums this up perfectly.
"Police respond to crime, they don't stop crime"
@Andrei Melnikov In context your statement says: "You should never take any steps to being self reliant or self sufficient for your defense, of which nobody else is responsible for. Because of what others may react or think".
@Andrei Melnikov what needs to be reduced is polarisation, not gun ownership.
"Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary."
- Karl Marx
I for once think that only applies to places were guns are already readly avalible. I dont think we should arm populations that are unarmed but if guns are already a factor, like they are in the USA, then i rather the good guys have guns instead of just the right wing
@@tdl1315 feel like this idea stems from End of History thinking. It's harder to get guns in some places, but its still a worthwhile endeavor, if for no other reason than to make gun groups less of a far-right recruiting ground
@@communisticus191 i just dont see the utility in having a tool whos sole purposue is to kill other menbers of your species be soo readly avalible. I dont think the right or the left should be armed because i dont think anyone should be armed outside of the military
You called?
ofcourse youre much higher likely hood of dieing if you draw your gun, youre in a gunfight?
The Anarchists have long said weapons are necessary.
After Jan 6 every freedom loving american who doesnt want to live in a fascist hellhole should arm up and train with friends and family.
Lol😂
Try what was going on in Portland. It was a leftist utopia.
After the riots for months over dead felons, every American loving patriot should defend their towns from radical Far Leftists just like Kyle Rittenhouse did.
train with friends and family sounds like a fkn cult. if anything arming yourself is one of the steps to self-sufficiency
Fascism doesn't sound so bad compared to the self righteousness of liberal whites.
This is so sad, but unfortunately necessary. I appreciate that they're focusing on safe and responsible gun use. Everyone deserves to feel safe and that they can defend themselves and their families, when needed.
crazy town!
When I am suppose to feel safe? When everyone is carrying a gun? One hundred and fifty years ago on the western frontier everyone carried a gun. The city of Dodge in the the 1880s had a homicide rate 300 times higher than Miami in the 1980s. Every statistic shows that the more guns you have the higher the homicide rate rises. WHY? because a drunken argument in a bar without guns is just a fist fight with 3-4 people getting some bruises and maybe some broken bones, but a bar fight when everyone is carrying a gun turns into a blood bath with 5 people dead.
@@jpegjpg Except that you are lying or at the very "best" misinformed. Dodge City had about 5 murders/year. The US used to have *less* gun violence when guns were completely free. Most European countries didn't have gun control either just 20, 30, 50 or 100 years back. Same there.
And I'm not even from the US. I'm from Sweden. We have more gun violence in 2023 with a draconic gun law and criminal immigrants (usually non-European) getting hold of guns anyway than we had in 1923, when my great grandfather was young and there was no gun law at all and Sweden was 99.9% ethnically Swedish.
Only sheep believe in gun laws.
@@jpegjpg dodge only had one murder a year. Try again.
Safety is always relative, and completely unconnected with feeling.
Relying on a police force for security is the foolishness that got the US into its current mess. It is already been established in court that they have no obligation to save anyone but themselves. You cannot outsource safety. Only you can safeguard you and your family's livelihood. Everyone needs to become well trained, and also become well-acquainted with your neighbors.
"having a gun makes you more likely to die"
the police should also just throw away their guns i guess...
Education is always good.
No matter who you are in the USA you have a right to own a firearm to protect yourself and your family.
No, you don't.
@@automnejoy5308 yes you do. Guaranteed in the constitution.
@@kylethedarkness Since 2008. Not before. We need justices who will correct Scalia's error.
1:53 No one is saying you don’t have a right to live, just don’t wiggle it about in peoples faces. Don’t make what hole you enjoy to rub up against beer your entire personality. It’s pretty simple. The 3% that have a problem with it will always have a problem with it the world‘s not perfect it never will be, have some personal emotional discipline. Read some Marcus Aurelius…
Indeed, it's alarming that while we're embroiled in conflicts with one another, the surge in AI and Robotics technology threatens to replace a majority of human jobs. Regrettably, this crucial period in our history isn't even being considered by the average person, as we are more focused on aligning our neighbors with our value systems. Meanwhile, the decision-makers are meticulously planning the future of humanity, pondering what to do with the masses who are no longer needed to sustain the wealth of the elite.
The events of the past years have been so significant and extreme and we just keep moving on like nothing is happening. Every little detail is important to our history; I wonder how it'll be perceived in the future, if we last into it.
@@Ras98X considering the near future, It's a common misconception that hard work alone guarantees a secure position in society. It's unrealistic to believe that one can outperform a machine no matter how willing you are to sacrifice, and it's even more misguided to expect the Elites of society to willingly share their wealth with us once they don't need us anymore to produce for them. Their actions have consistently shown a prioritization of their own well-being over broad wealth distribution or the common good of society. They are more focused on ensuring a comfortable transition for themselves and their families while we fight with each other. This is the perfect distraction for them.
... and in other complete non-sequiturs, Mets pitcher Jason O'Malley has publicly denounced orange juice as a leading cause of diabetes in pre-teens...
@@lashlarue7924😆😆😆😆😆😆
Trades will be safe for quite sometime.
Between unionships, the lack of market share anyone company has and the cost of developing and implementing any kind of automation is out of the question.
Throw in retrofitting, repair and maintenance of existing structures and you've found more security.
But a computer that can write its own code, that's a real conundrum there.
A whole new chapter has started, and it's bigger than the internet or the gun.
Young fellow, a gun battle isn't statistical. Nor is a mob. I'm left, I carry. ✌️
Self-defense is lawful.
In America, that might mean legal carry.
For as frequently as he kept looking at his notes to be statistically correct, he could’ve also looked through his notes to see how much membership costs and if a license is required & as an LGBTQ Person, how to go into business with a weapon.
Getting to that point huh... people should mind their own business. Whatever sexuality you fancy, it is YOUR BUSINESS. What the frog with these hate groups?!
IT'S ALL the mental midgets little Musolini's who want to put their self riteous nose in everybody's business. Time for them to feel the pain
More like keep your business to yourself and leave the rest of us out of it.
Nobody cared till the children were targeted
@@petervizzini4006 which never happened, except by sports coaches and priests
@@down-to-earth-mystery-schooleachers touch kids at 100x the rate of priests, you’re indoctrination is showing, there’s been a 100% increase in children indemnifying as trans in the past 5 years 😂😂 if you think kids aren’t being targeted you need to look at timelines and normalities in societies lol. it’s incredible how someone will try to convince you as much as they can that they’re rational, then say something like kids aren’t being targeted 😂😂😂
Imagine being shot by a furry
Stranger things have happened
First and foremost your own security is your own responsibility. And our founders prepared for the answer in form of our bill of rights.
I'm an 45-ish year old American Independent voter. I lean left for sure... but I don't subscribe to a particular party or ideology. Most of my friends who are farther left (than I am) own guns. No one is under any illusions about the history of our country, civil rights, labor unions, etc. Where we are now is just another page in the chapter of bigotry. In another 50-75 years it will be behind us as we slowly (ever too slowly) work our way into the next chapter of the American experience.
Leftism is a disease
You're either an ally or transphobe. Pick your side cuz gun control aint gonna save ya!
Many are under illusion.
The left are causing all the problems and the government knows it.
The US will cease to exist by 50 years, will prob be full of chinese
Anyone who puts an anti-trans sticker on their Honda accord is clearly in the closet lol
Or simply a bigot. We gotta believe more that there are many straight, cis-gender bigots out there.
The loudest "conservatives" often get found out to themselves commit the wildest debauchery.
I am fine with the don't tread on me types getting armed, but for the people who love to censor others to get armed, that is concerning. Self defense and hunting are ok, but forcing your will on others is not. The left wing has more trouble with that
Trust me its not us lefties doing the censoring.
Not having it and needing it is way worse than having it and not needing to use it😅😅😅
The emergence of pro gun left, as surprising as that is, I kind of saw that coming, given the context
Well, if guns don't get banned, like in most civilized countries, this will happen.
@@jasperchance3382 Guns arent really banned in any country.
It's been around for years
@@dr.livesey7595 well, you know what I mean.
@@jasperchance3382 No I dont know what you mean since switzerland has the same part of the population owning a gun while having one of the lowest crime rates on the planet. If a certain demographic group would be send back to their natural habitat homicide rates would drop around 60% as well in the US.
Well this looks like it's going to end really well for everybody😢😮
Is that sarcasm that I hear? 😂
strap in, theres a lot of money being poured into the hate machine and it aint slowing down any time soon. Its almost certainly going to get a LOT worse, especially with external factors like global conflicts and climate catastrophes compounding everything.
Certain hateful ideologies will no longer be tolerated
Where are people to say that when the proud boys are out there marching with their guns shouting racial epithets and whatnot. No one seems to ever care how that will end they just keep saying "mental health" after each shooting.
@@Conservatismfailedus Who decides what a "hateful ideology" is?
Take up arm comrades!
Armed minorities are HARDER TO OPPRESS
And armed majorities are even harder to oppress.
The NRA approves this message...
They are the ones doing the oppressing
@@uptown_rider8078 How so?
@@OpDab Minorities are the ones invading our countries and replacing us in our own homelands. Using violence and deadly force to genocide us
You can arm yourself and still believe in responsible gun laws. You can drive a car and want others to have a driver's test: I don't understand how this is too hard for people to swallow.
You aren't trying to understand. Do you want DeSantis or Trump deciding that being gay is a mental condition and passing an executive order to ban gay people from having guns? Many people have guns for protection from the government. That is why they don't want the government making laws about guns.
Common sense is something most people don't know
You can have whatever beliefs you want and not be a bad person, the problem is that when you give an inch a mile gets taken, that's why there can be no compromise on fundamental rights, the government now seems to think that they are privileges because people lack discipline and understanding.
When it's not about surviving but, instead, about taking them with you.
Yeah you're on the "precipice of reason" alright
@@reallyhappenings5597 omg is this reallyhappening? Usernames, how fun...what year is it?
@@theprecipiceofreason You feeling so threatened that you fantasize about "taking them with you" is, indeed, really happening.
@@reallyhappenings5597 Yes, you got me. This video was about me and it wasn't just a pithy distillation of the content within it. i'm actually all the characters and was simply refracted for camera. amazing deduction sherlock
@@theprecipiceofreason You've "liked" your own comments, haven't you.
Mental illness and firearms dont mix well however.
They have a right to be armed, they are smart to train, and they have every reason to be concerned about escalating violence. I disagree with their politics and their beliefs but I support their rights regardless. Embracing that is required. Embracing each other's politics is not. I see nothing wrong or concerning here, but I do see the growing push to make their ethics into policy as concerning....just as I see it concerning when I see it on the religious right.
As an American I give them the benefit of the doubt until I see otherwise.
I wish more of you were like this. We need to be armed. Say what you will about us lefties, it's not us with a history of unprovoked violence.
@@tristanband4003 woah there buddy. That's exactly what we are worried about; you think you are the good guys. You're not. When I say "we" I mean moderates. I see your flags and your pride and your self-righteousness exactly the way I see people on the right. You young folk don't remember the Cold War or Stalinism either because it stopped being taught. The Left is just as dangerous as the Right. Any system of beliefs that is so strong that it can ignore the history and beliefs of others is. People have good reason not to go along with the New Left; tearing down statues and flags and religion and speech and putting up your own doesn't end well in the canon of history.
But I still support your rights.... especially because a lot of people on your side don't support my own.
@tristanband4003 glad you have a brain about the 2A, but seriously? The left doesn't have a history of unprovoked violence? BRUH
@@tristanband4003 wellllllllll, I wouldn't say that lol
@@tristanband4003idk man the 20th century would like to have a talk
Why are you more likely to die in an attack if you have a gun? He threw out the data without providing an explanation to that.
The report doesn't actually delve into the 'why' - it merely confirms that statistically you are more likely. The 'why' would be speculative, and the report dealt only with facts.
It's a bit obvious isn't it? If you're getting robbed at gun point and you also have a gun, you are far more likely to get shot over that robbery than if you had just cooperated with the thief. Same applies to most violent situations, even getting pulled over by police could turn deadly if they perceive you as a threat to their own safety. Having a gun might save you in certain situations but it might also escalate a situation that wasn't deadly in the first place.
@@distantraveller9876 No dipshit that's not where the statistic comes from. It comes from the largest source of gun violence in the U.S gang on gang violence where both parties have firearms. That number also includes criminals who have died with a gun as a result of lawful self defense. The situation you described is exceedingly rare.
Wow, it's almost like everyone opposed to gun control has been saying that for years.
Wouldn’t be necessary if the right wasn’t armed to the teeth and spouting fascist talking points
@@Valiguss Almost like the left shouldn't have been screeching at those in the center at every given opportunity while simultaneously sprinting further left while the right took a casual jog further right, leading a majority of centrists to just hate the left.
I'm left leaning but I'm huge on guns and served in the military, i'm heavy against any anti gun laws. We all deserve to protect ourselfs.
My group is also left leaning and we all own guns and served in the military. The leftists who are anti gun are a loud minority.
The Right are facists only looking to restrict the rights of people. We are against this army rejects and we are not gonna stand idle while they destroy our rights and freedom.
To anyone taking any Right Wing group seriously, just watch some of their Training videos. Guys can bearly do squats and march, mostly overweight neckbeards playing soldiers and some guy yelling at 20% volume unlike a real drill instructor and saying "Oh you will get better just keep at it". Army rejects. If only they got to the military they would be thought some discipline and manners.
You forgetting that most of army is right wing.
@@ninjaa6952 not true at all. We enter right wing, get stabbed in the back by right wingers and start supporting left wing.
I would like to see these statistics that claim such nonsense in terms of assault and results of a defensive use with a firearm.
The 2nd amendment is for all Americans. I’m glad they are using and practicing those rights. All Americans should. Regardless of your politics or anything else.
Don't support people who want to kill you dude.
@@Cato76 Until they actually do anything they have every right to be armed.
@@Spartan265 They do but you still shouldn't encourage them.
@@Cato76 They don't want to kill you. But they don't want to be killed, and they will kill if the alternative is the fascist death camp.
It's actually for state government militias like the National Guard. But the Supreme Court ruled 5 to 4 in 2008 it's for everybody. It's a perversion of the text, but activist right wing judges produced by the Federalist Society don't really care much for law.
I am left of center when it comes to social issues and I agree with gun ownership in america. While best gun owner is the guy who never use their gun, on both the right and left side but they are a reality of today's america with the rise of extremism.
I disagree, you shouldn't own a gun if you aren't regularly practicing with it.
Truth!
Both the far religious right AND the LGBTQ far left are two bully ideologies that push themselves on ppl that don’t wanna chose either.
Most ppl want nothing to do with either of them.
I’ve lived in Texas all my life nobody cares what anybody else is doing we all help each other out no matter who you are I don’t know where they find these stories never came across or even heard from someone who actually knows an extremist from any side… weird
@@nevets2371 you shouldn't own one. Period. There is absolutely no need for a gun in anyone's life.
@@nevets2371 hes talking about actively discharging your firearm in firefights of course a common sensed person would hone their skills and practice.
Everyone is falling for the bs. This is exactly what the upper management want. They will be eating cake and celebrating when that first shot is heard around the world.
I can't even keep track of all of the lies that I'm hearing throughout this 7:44 minute hit piece.
Those without arms can still die upon them.
Happy to be a European without guns, but seeing the failure of the 2nd amendment as well as attempt to rein it in, I can't fault them for arming themselves.
It wasn't a "failure". Arms are needed to overthrow governments. The founders of this country literally dealt with that first hand...... it may be necessary once again to overthrow this government if things keep getting worse.
Is America headed toward being like Northern Ireland during The Troubles?
Unfortunately yes.
Yes, and I embrace it.
Much worse, try Ukraine during WW-2.
@@taras3702 so we are going to get invaded?
no. because in that case the victism didn't fire back.
Sorry but i think he got the 25 auto and 9mm swapped.😂
I too am a marksmanship instructor and have been for 40+ years.
I am non political and am not a member of any political party
If I saw an “instructor” with a target looking like that I would keep looking
These militias best get their act together and focus on the owner class exploiting them all lol
I definitely don't agree with their politics but I support what they are doing by training and arming themselves! The second amendment is for everyone and I think its great these guys are doing what they are doing because it preserves the right to bear arms the more Americans exercise this right!! My hope is these guys think about the second amendment when they go vote or maybe it makes them press their reps about gun control when they push for it.
You speak as if the second amendment is at risk . It is not and never actually has been. The issues are around what type of guns people should be able to own and keeping guns out of the hands of people who are having mental problems that place them or others at risk.
please do read the second amendment again.
"a well regulated state militia" is not EVERYONE.
So the role of the second amendment is to protect the second amendment, and the metric that the second amendment is working in what most Americans delude themselves into believing is a democracy, is when two dominant opposing sides arm themselves to the teeth.
Do you realise how insane that looks to the rest of the world??
@@mizzury54 there is a constant attack on the second amendment and if we cave in they will keep chipping away at it until we don't have a second amendment. I would say attempting to ban the most popular rifle in America puts the second amendment in danger.
@lazypops3117 it doesn't say "state" militia and that isnt how the SCOTUS has ruled on it. Try again
7:24 Believe it or not I completely agree that if you bring a gun to a gun fight you’ve got a 90-95% chance of dying… keep the guns at home tucked away and don’t use them… hate begets hate and none of that helps anyone.
EVERY AMERICAN SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO PROTECT THEIR MARIJUANA CROP WITH FULLY AUTOMATIC WEAPONS.
After Trump, I don't see why so many people want police and the military to be the only ones allowed to have guns. Do you really trust the president and police with ALL the power?
@@d.r.u. You mean the Taliban? Who you talkin' about?
Noup
The usual Euro angle: disarming the public because guns cause more problems than they solve, until that anchor is getting cornered by three guys in a parking garage and finds that giving them a speech about patriarchy doesn't stop them from throwing her into a van and raping/murdering her because she didn't have a handgun. We forget that our civil nature exists in an economic bubble that can pop at any time.
If you get cornered by 3 guys in a parking garage it's unlikely a gun will save you. Chances are those 3 men all have guns too. Now instead of just getting raped you've also gotten shot in the face for trying to pull a gun on your attackers.
How come the trainer doesnt know how to correctly hold and aim the handgun?
He knows, but today he's focusing on on teaching first aid.
Here's the thing when it hits the fan most of you will starve to death cuz the people who produced the food your power another utilities are on the right