0:05 accumulators ON 0:10 display/warning lights TEST 0:20 APU (auxiliary power unit) ON 1:05 electrical system SETUP for engine start and generators ON 1:15 hydraulic system ON 1:55 fuel pumps ON 2:10 "automatic" engine-starter ON 2:15 left engine START 3:05 center engine START 3:50 right engine START 4:30 automatic starter OFF 4:55 APU OFF 5:25 high pressure air system and airconditioning sys. SETUP 6:30 engine TEST and warmup 7:30 END of warmup 8:00 thrust reversers TEST ( I'm not proffesional or something like that)
I can't believe how well Project Tupolev captured the look, sound and overall feel of the engineer's panel for the 154! And it's freeware!! It sounds just like this!!
My grandpa captained one of these for over 25 years for Tajik Airways years and years ago. When you meet a man like that you know exactly why he was capable of flying one of these beasts and not everyone is.
Skilled engineer. There is a great document for the startup procedure for this plane in the flightgear docs, does this and all the gyro / autopilot alignments. Good read. The navigation system in this thing is actually unbelievable in a modern age of gps, had to read it a few times and I still don't understand it fully. I can see why this cockpit had a dedicated navigator in these planes, in addition to the engineer.
Thats the inefficient turbo jet engines. Modern engines are high bypass turbo fans and less noisy/more fuel efficient. Also meet noise regulations. These are 1950's/60s designs from a byegone era. Most airlines got rid of jet engines in the 1970's and 80's.
@@bEEBO178 he said it is an awesome engine noise, he is not saying it the the most efficient engine ever built. It is an awesome engine noise, it was in the 1970/1980's and it still will be in 2040.
@@Baer9471 depending on which generation.. The old ones would still laugh a bit cuz the Russian technology always was a decade or more behind but they wouldnt laugh as much as the pilots from the newer gens
Dear RA85535 That was the best engine start up i have ever seen. I love Russian aircraft. I admirer all the design innovations that are developed throughout the cold war We were always told that Russian aircraft were inferior to US planes I can tell you that they were wrong. I am so glad that we have the internet. Thank you for posting the videos. Wishing you best regrades from us here in the states. Max
Здравствуйте, да я уверен что это именно 85535 из Бориспольского отряда. Вы абсолютно правы борт порезали в 2007-ом, я лично благодаря нескольким преданным нашему делу людей выдирал из под ножа всё что мог... На видео имитатор создающийся на базе кабины этого борта, так что борт порезали, а частичка его продолжает жить. Ну а звуки, это же всего лишь звуки, правда. )
Oh how I miss it! Replaced by a computer. Was talking to an old retired KC-97 FE the other day and I said to him "I bet no one in the sky on this day muttered 'shorted secondary on 24 left' and entered it in the 780".
😂 if the light doesn’t turn on, tap with finger. Love it ! Basically it’s the same sequence 3 times, 3 engines. Love the sounds. True engineering right there
Missing screws is a way of life in an in-service airplane, western, or otherwise. Really each instrument needs only two. That blue color, oh, that was also McDonnell Douglas paint scheme for the DC-9 fleet, and even some DC-8s were painted that way out of the box. If you were ever a DC8 flight engineer, you flip almost that many switches, and knobs. Only the switches didn't "click" that load. LOL!!
I was totally impressed with how "solid" ALL of the switches sounded as they were activated! SNAP, SNAP!!! Usually don't get that kind of reaction. Just love all of those autosyn synchro style indicators; those ARE instruments! I agree, the NEW panels are OK, but that "ain't" switching the switches, or manipulating the controls. This IS flying at its best! Thanks, N-6395T & B-6370 USPA
AFAIK this is a sound of a device which equalizes fuel consumption from the tanks (автомат розхода - awtamat razhoda), so the plane center of gravity wont get shifted to one side or front/back. If you have MSFS, go download the Project Tupolev Tu-154 and try everything yourself. The startup procedure may seem complicated, but is rather logical when you know what you are doing.
Listen to all those ticking relays this aircraft is manually operated using simple eletric and electronic devices thus no need of complex and sensitive computers that noone except from the manufacture can fix or replace. So it will fly as long someone can push the buttons.
I imagine the design committee having this conversation.... But yuri, you say that this new plane can start up in only 7 simple steps...? Da, we have used a lot of automation in this one. Ahhh but the president wants to show the world and his country that we do it right, the Russian way.... OK, I add 3000 more redundant switches and blinkenlights to make it look great. Da yuri, you'll get a promotion for the thinking!
honestly wtf is up with your dualism. I love both automatisation and manual control In most aircraft you fire up the APU with 1 button, attleast in the Tupolev you still have control over all it's functions. In the airbus you have that too but it's digital.
Вы сравниваете самолеты разных поколений. Если посмотрите на самолеты той же эпохи, например, Боинг 727 - там заморочек будет не меньше. И никакой цифровой кабины, и двумя человеками точно не отделаетесь.
Analog gauge..lights..switches..and turbo jet engine sounds..never fail to impress me. One thing that confuse me, is it only engine 1 & 3 reversing in Tu 154?
Good question... Once in the air I think there should be the same procedure for inflight start using the natural fan autorotation... Actually you should focus only on the deffective engine. I think you have just to move the start-master, crank and the respective engine start selector to on (up position) providing continuos it ignition, ensure you have the right forward speed and... pray! ;p
And yes and no.. Originally russian planes were very safe. But "many crashes happened after the collapse of the USSR when from one huge AEROFLOT were created a lot of small independent companies. They bought cheap Chinese spares and did not fulfill the requirements of maintenance." Also young inexperienced pilots: "It’s always bad maintenance or a pilot error that causes the crash."
yea its true that it give alot of help but if the two pilots that were accepted to work for the airliner after years of heavy training can do almost the same as what the 3rd person would do, every normal airliner pilot is an engineer itself. today a pilot has to know everything about the aircraft that he is flying, pilots know how to avoid and detect every mistake that has been done in the past.
После запуска ВСУ открывает краны наддува, потом включает ПСВП и снова открывает. Запуск двигателей не совсем правильный, открытие РОД-ов ещё до включения стартёра - это шанс устроить факел из двигателя, РОД-ы открываются при раскрутке ротора высокого давления до 15-20 %, чтобы не лить топливо в нераскрутившийся двигатель. Но в целом - нельзя не короновать творцов этой кабины!
haha very funny.. now read this: Tu-154, built - 932, lost - 73 (8% of all), 3172 people died; Boeing 727 (design like Tu154) built-1832, lost-180 (9,8%), 4039 died. Worst aircraft? Worst safety?.. Fools!
also keep in mind that ALL of the lost Tu-154 are not because design fault - they were poor weather, poor airport, poor engineer, poor maintenance.. and something like that
There's actually a Tu-154M test bed that has glass cockpit displays similar to the a320 on the captains side. And if a non-Russian country has a Tu-154, the controls should be in English then
That would be amazing! I love this place, but its gotten too old. It would kick some serious ass if they could produce a new generation Tu-154 with the same shape, glass cockpit and English variant cockpit!
0:05 accumulators ON
0:10 display/warning lights TEST
0:20 APU (auxiliary power unit) ON
1:05 electrical system SETUP for engine start and generators ON
1:15 hydraulic system ON
1:55 fuel pumps ON
2:10 "automatic" engine-starter ON
2:15 left engine START
3:05 center engine START
3:50 right engine START
4:30 automatic starter OFF
4:55 APU OFF
5:25 high pressure air system and airconditioning sys. SETUP
6:30 engine TEST and warmup
7:30 END of warmup
8:00 thrust reversers TEST
( I'm not proffesional or something like that)
awesome!
spasibo bolshoye
I can't believe you are not professional. You must be a bear pilot or at least its flight engineer. Awesome. Thanks.
Thank you very much!
Not left/right, but starboard and port engines
3:28 Russian engineering and improvisation... When something doesn't work just tap the panel to turn the light on... . Priceless!
Best startup video. Nobody would steal my car if it took this much effort. I want all of those toggle switches to play with.
I love these old airplanes, they are so mechanical compared to modern aircraft!
I can't believe how well Project Tupolev captured the look, sound and overall feel of the engineer's panel for the 154! And it's freeware!! It sounds just like this!!
Try felis tupolev😊😊
I love these crazy relays, sounds like music, and have not interference with movile phones. Built to last for decades
It's the mechanism that is similar in the old caravel, counts fuel units burned as I recall.
But what a marvel she is.
My grandpa captained one of these for over 25 years for Tajik Airways years and years ago. When you meet a man like that you know exactly why he was capable of flying one of these beasts and not everyone is.
With Russian switches there is no doubt in your mind if they're on or off!
Skilled engineer. There is a great document for the startup procedure for this plane in the flightgear docs, does this and all the gyro / autopilot alignments. Good read.
The navigation system in this thing is actually unbelievable in a modern age of gps, had to read it a few times and I still don't understand it fully. I can see why this cockpit had a dedicated navigator in these planes, in addition to the engineer.
The Tupolevs have always had an awesome engine noise.
Thats the inefficient turbo jet engines. Modern engines are high bypass turbo fans and less noisy/more fuel efficient. Also meet noise regulations. These are 1950's/60s designs from a byegone era. Most airlines got rid of jet engines in the 1970's and 80's.
Absolutely! And the IL-76 too!!
@@bEEBO178 Please preserve your wasted energy on defecating in comments. Become more efficient!
@@bEEBO178 he said it is an awesome engine noise, he is not saying it the the most efficient engine ever built. It is an awesome engine noise, it was in the 1970/1980's and it still will be in 2040.
@@bEEBO178still beats a 727 though
Imagine the face of an Airbus pilot when he sees this :P
Or JAS pilot! :)
😂😂😂😂😂
They would be laughing at how unnecessarily and dated it all is 😂
@@bEEBO178 I mean Boeing 747 pilot wouldn’t be laughing to this lol
@@Baer9471 depending on which generation.. The old ones would still laugh a bit cuz the Russian technology always was a decade or more behind but they wouldnt laugh as much as the pilots from the newer gens
Dear RA85535 That was the best engine start up i have ever seen. I love Russian aircraft.
I admirer all the design innovations that are developed throughout the cold war
We were always told that Russian aircraft were inferior to US planes I can tell you that they were wrong. I am so glad that we have the internet. Thank you for posting the videos. Wishing you best regrades from us here in the states. Max
Holly molly! That thing is complicated! A 727 is easy a against this Bird. Respect to Engineers and Pilots who can operate that aircraft!
Ok, everybody got that? Now it's your turn...
✌😂👍
You first, then you, you and you. LOL
This is pure art 😍
Y E S 😍😍😍😍
Procedures on how to turn on a woman.
cruxader27 more like introduction
Exactly. I thought the same way
That is far more complicated and unpredictable!
Jajajaj yess
Its in the video
Can you imagine the training that goes in to learning the proper sequence of what switches and when, to do the engine startup?
It's like starting a spaceship
Здравствуйте, да я уверен что это именно 85535 из Бориспольского отряда.
Вы абсолютно правы борт порезали в 2007-ом, я лично благодаря нескольким преданным нашему делу людей выдирал из под ножа всё что мог...
На видео имитатор создающийся на базе кабины этого борта, так что борт порезали, а частичка его продолжает жить.
Ну а звуки, это же всего лишь звуки, правда. )
Oh how I miss it! Replaced by a computer. Was talking to an old retired KC-97 FE the other day and I said to him "I bet no one in the sky on this day muttered 'shorted secondary on 24 left' and entered it in the 780".
I love the Tu-145, today it is way to simpel to fly a plane :p
Haha, I obvious mean the Tu-154
Bureaucratic engineering!
😂 if the light doesn’t turn on, tap with finger. Love it ! Basically it’s the same sequence 3 times, 3 engines. Love the sounds. True engineering right there
And I thought a 727 Engineers Panel was a pain in the ass .
Es war für mich eine Ehre mit diesem super Flugzeug zu fliegen. Vielen Dank. Druschbar.
real mens work
Can you imagine an Airbus pilot being asked to do that start up they would walk out the cockpit.
*airbus driver*
Missing screws is a way of life in an in-service airplane, western, or otherwise. Really each instrument needs only two. That blue color, oh, that was also McDonnell Douglas paint scheme for the DC-9 fleet, and even some DC-8s were painted that way out of the box. If you were ever a DC8 flight engineer, you flip almost that many switches, and knobs. Only the switches didn't "click" that load. LOL!!
This kind of start-up engine, should be mounted on the cars also....!!!
Yes, I would love to do this at 6am every morning before work🤣🤣🤣
Tushka for ever !!! ✌😍😘😍✌
Drushba, Mir, Slava i 'Chest !
I took all my notes and can fly TU-154 now.
Судя по стенке это Тренажер КТС Ту 154 б-2
Um painel dos sonhos ! Saudações do Brasil !
I was totally impressed with how "solid" ALL of the switches sounded as they were activated! SNAP, SNAP!!! Usually don't get that kind of reaction.
Just love all of those autosyn synchro style indicators; those ARE instruments! I agree, the NEW panels are OK, but that "ain't" switching the switches, or manipulating the controls. This IS flying at its best! Thanks, N-6395T & B-6370 USPA
Мегареспектище! Удачи вам, мужики!
I want a 154 home sim now.
Жаль только, что первый насос подкачки мозг компостирует. Я бы взлетать не стал. Вы - талант!
Holy… switches… I’m in love!
What a checklist! So many steps!
AFAIK this is a sound of a device which equalizes fuel consumption from the tanks (автомат розхода - awtamat razhoda), so the plane center of gravity wont get shifted to one side or front/back. If you have MSFS, go download the Project Tupolev Tu-154 and try everything yourself. The startup procedure may seem complicated, but is rather logical when you know what you are doing.
Очень скучаю по этим Советским тумблерам. Щелкают отлично!
man...that's crazy :D
I bet there's a guy standing off-camera making all the clicking sound effects :D
There's a guy somewhere complaining that he thinks the buttons are fake.
What a great video. Would you consider writing the steps down? I love Russian aviation and I have project Tupolov but the manual in in Russian.
first 2 minutes are just to start up the toilets.
ron hawkins
And you need 5 months to start your brain.
+Paka1918 LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
ron hawkins longer than that. The tubes have to warm up first.
If they made cars like this, they would never be any car theft.
If anyone is wondering if this is a simulator, it is, the guy has two other videos in this simulator on his channel
Beautiful. If only I could set this as my wallpaper.
more switches!! more!! please more!!!
feels more like rocket science than aviation to me
Listen to all those ticking relays this aircraft is manually operated using simple eletric and electronic devices thus no need of complex and sensitive computers that noone except from the manufacture can fix or replace. So it will fly as long someone can push the buttons.
Wow. Flight engineer. Ancient 1960s tech.
exactly what you should expect from a 60's aircraft lol
I imagine the design committee having this conversation....
But yuri, you say that this new plane can start up in only 7 simple steps...?
Da, we have used a lot of automation in this one.
Ahhh but the president wants to show the world and his country that we do it right, the Russian way....
OK, I add 3000 more redundant switches and blinkenlights to make it look great.
Da yuri, you'll get a promotion for the thinking!
i love all the Tupolev the Russians think out of the box
honestly wtf is up with your dualism.
I love both automatisation and manual control
In most aircraft you fire up the APU with 1 button, attleast in the Tupolev you still have control over all it's functions. In the airbus you have that too but it's digital.
2:07 More buttons and switches are spawning!!
I love manual system ..
Good video i like this
no nie mogę na to patrzeć , łzy mi lecą ze śmiechu!!!
ah what fun! i want that in my house just to stay playing :P
@ARKIEX much better plane to fly on than any Boeing or Airbus ive flown on :)
Very much work - PUH! Thank´s for sharing. :-)
mazing plane! TU-154
Tushka for ever ✊😍👍
КТС Ту 154 б2 либо в Жулянах УТО УТЦ либо в КИИ ГА в ангаре на кафедре безопасность полетов
This is how Chernobyl blew up!!
офигеть сколько всяких заморочек! на боингах и эйрбасах все намного проще и понятнее, там цифровая кабина и экипаж 2 человека.
Вы сравниваете самолеты разных поколений. Если посмотрите на самолеты той же эпохи, например, Боинг 727 - там заморочек будет не меньше. И никакой цифровой кабины, и двумя человеками точно не отделаетесь.
Класс Класс Хочу Хочу Вы просто МОЛОДЕЦ
я немного звукоинженер и на микшере тоже ручечек-лампочечек немало, но ЭТО!!! респект - мягко выражаясь! =D
The pilots of the future will look at what pilots do TODAY and thinks it’s crazy:)
Design brief: How many switches do we need?
Implementation: Yes
Analog gauge..lights..switches..and turbo jet engine sounds..never fail to impress me. One thing that confuse me, is it only engine 1 & 3 reversing in Tu 154?
Good question... Once in the air I think there should be the same procedure for inflight start using the natural fan autorotation... Actually you should focus only on the deffective engine. I think you have just to move the start-master, crank and the respective engine start selector to on (up position) providing continuos it ignition, ensure you have the right forward speed and... pray! ;p
And yes and no.. Originally russian planes were very safe. But "many crashes happened after the collapse of the USSR when from one huge AEROFLOT were created a lot of small independent companies. They bought cheap Chinese spares and did not fulfill the requirements of maintenance." Also young inexperienced pilots: "It’s always bad maintenance or a pilot error that causes the crash."
YIKES! FE training must have been TOUGH....
Это не насос мозг компостирует, это лампочка зараза )))
Спасибо за отзывы!
I have only one engine in my Tupolev but i can go to work tomorrow! ))
And I thought my saturn was hard to start :/
Спасибо за видео
An airplane for *PILOTS*, not for MOUSE CLICKERS! ;o)
yea its true that it give alot of help but if the two pilots that were accepted to work for the airliner after years of heavy training can do almost the same as what the 3rd person would do, every normal airliner pilot is an engineer itself. today a pilot has to know everything about the aircraft that he is flying, pilots know how to avoid and detect every mistake that has been done in the past.
После запуска ВСУ открывает краны наддува, потом включает ПСВП и снова открывает. Запуск двигателей не совсем правильный, открытие РОД-ов ещё до включения стартёра - это шанс устроить факел из двигателя, РОД-ы открываются при раскрутке ротора высокого давления до 15-20 %, чтобы не лить топливо в нераскрутившийся двигатель. Но в целом - нельзя не короновать творцов этой кабины!
Ok . I prefer my key twist start of my car 😅
I had an old Suzuki Jimny, you had to start it like that as well.
часиков у бортинжинера нету чекать время запуска каждого двигателя)))
thanks mate. i would like to know what would happen if they've got an engine flameout while flying... going all over again must be hard
haha very funny.. now read this:
Tu-154, built - 932, lost - 73 (8% of all), 3172 people died;
Boeing 727 (design like Tu154) built-1832, lost-180 (9,8%), 4039 died.
Worst aircraft? Worst safety?.. Fools!
more exactly 1026 were produced until the end on the assembly line in 2013
@@ElShogoso and there wasn’t, the accident that happened at the Paris Air Show was human error, the pilot crossed the structural limit of the aircraft
also keep in mind that ALL of the lost Tu-154 are not because design fault - they were poor weather, poor airport, poor engineer, poor maintenance.. and something like that
@@frankhan8993 +
Correct! No design error like Boeing Max....
It would be sooo great if they could produce a new generation TU-154 with glass screens, flybywire and an English variant of the cockpit.
There's actually a Tu-154M test bed that has glass cockpit displays similar to the a320 on the captains side. And if a non-Russian country has a Tu-154, the controls should be in English then
Yes, i also want an new Tu-154 variant. She MUST have 3 engines and the actual shape.
That would be amazing! I love this place, but its gotten too old. It would kick some serious ass if they could produce a new generation Tu-154 with the same shape, glass cockpit and English variant cockpit!
Glass cockpit? Gross.
iPetroSS still with the flight engineer
The Soviet Union , now Russia has built excellent planes. Very reliable planes . .
I could not agree MORE! \m/
Traditionally, the Flight Engineer is the most savvy crewman on board. Easy to understand why...
And he knew the best bars on a layover
Startup procedures for a jet are always complicated, even on American and European jets.
Baldur Aviation haha. No.
Baldur Aviation. US and European jets are more Advanced and less complicated. These Russians are way too complicated and wtf!!
thanks for the quick answer mate ;)
At least it appears to have an instruction manual built into it..
My GOD..... you would think they were going to the MOON.
Starting up three Soviet jet engines for take off. In the end. Success. I think.
is he playing with buttons?
alexit7 turning on a women
Excellent!!!!
Amen brother!
Мечтал быть бортинженером! В киевское поступать!! Получилось-стал механиком ,но в море!!!!
By the time you done fiping those toggle switches, the war is over & the jet obsolete.