This preacher is writing a new Bible. We already have at least trillion of them. But, to support own bible, he now and then runs back to so-called God's word.
Paul, by saying that all one needs to be saved is to have faith in Jesus, contradicts other scribes' assertion that one must-to be saved have faith in Jesus and do works [whatever that means??]. James, eg, says that faith without work does not save believers. Regarding the forgiveness of sins, there is two, but contradictory versions: 1 Jesus died to wipe away sins of all the people or once Jesus died, all believers became dead to sin [Ro 6:2], sinless, holy, purified, blameless, etc. 2 to have sins forgiven all any believer needs to do to have sins forgiven is to ask Jesus or God for it. So, which promise or revelation is true: believers are dead to sin or they keep on sinning and keep on asking Jesus for forgiveness? And how about the commands to love one's enemies and that Christians should love one another? Btw, is it neurologically possible to love one's enemies? Jesus said, Why do you say you love me if you do not obey my commands. Ro 3:20 says no one can obey scribal commands.
James saying faith without works is dead is referring to our spiritual walk. To be saved, is to know Christ, to have faith in Him, believe in the death and resurrection, repentance of sin, and treasuries Christ above everything else in life. Your works do nothing to help you enter glory, you work because you want to, not because you have to. Religion tells you you must work to earn your way, Christianity says there's nothing you can do to earn your way, so Christ had to do it for you.
Ro 1:21 "For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened". According to Paul, Jesus was telling him what to say or write [Gal 1:1], but Paul did by own admission also adduce in his letter also own opinions, commands, demands, wishes, etc. I now wonder if the author of 1:21 [or 1:18-32] was God or Paul. I think that this verse and many others verses in Paul's letters, came from Paul; for biblical God cannot, according to his alleged word, fail in anything he tries to achieve. So, when God calls you or makes you his possession or gives you knowledge of him, you remain his possession and retain the knowledge imparted by God into you forever. If not, then God labored in vain. So, Paul was as stupid as it gets! For my own sake, i do not conflate God or gods and their so-called holy books or the 'holy' books and the clergy or the clergy and most believers. Believing in any god does not have to lead to or cause harm even to one person. But i do think that all religions do a lot of wrongs against each other and the unbelievers. I also would not ever participate in any debate of any religion. Religions have to do with mythology or fantasies; which cannot ever be proved or disproved to be true or not true, but yet easily prove that all of them are evil in some ways.
Is God and/or his word the only and best teacher? No, not according to all or almost all believers in Jesus or NT God. Is the NT God also the best and the only healer? No, the IT is not the best healer, according to some people. Had the IT told every person who ever lived and is telling all of us even now that we are free to choose or not to choose the IT as their Savior. And then told us not to fear any punishment for making the 'wrong' [in eyes of clergy, but not ever the IT] choices? NT [and OT] believers more or a lot more scared of the clergy than the IT? After all, the IT is out of sight, thus also in very dim light. And clergy watch and watch you and wondering if you are joyfully giving them your money! God's [and other spooks'] residence in total darkness; thus, the IT still not able to find the Satan and other undesirable spooks? Or the IT [god] too lonely; thus, wants company? I am dying to find out what's 'happening' up or down there. Btw, nothing can happen up or down there; for even time does not happen.
This preacher is writing a new Bible. We already have at least trillion of them. But, to support own bible, he now and then runs back to so-called God's word.
Excuse me?
Paul, by saying that all one needs to be saved is to have faith in Jesus, contradicts other scribes' assertion that one must-to be saved have faith in Jesus and do works [whatever that means??]. James, eg, says that faith without work does not save believers. Regarding the forgiveness of sins, there is two, but contradictory versions: 1 Jesus died to wipe away sins of all the people or once Jesus died, all believers became dead to sin [Ro 6:2], sinless, holy, purified, blameless, etc. 2 to have sins forgiven all any believer needs to do to have sins forgiven is to ask Jesus or God for it.
So, which promise or revelation is true: believers are dead to sin or they keep on sinning and keep on asking Jesus for forgiveness? And how about the commands to love one's enemies and that Christians should love one another? Btw, is it neurologically possible to love one's enemies? Jesus said, Why do you say you love me if you do not obey my commands. Ro 3:20 says no one can obey scribal commands.
James saying faith without works is dead is referring to our spiritual walk.
To be saved, is to know Christ, to have faith in Him, believe in the death and resurrection, repentance of sin, and treasuries Christ above everything else in life.
Your works do nothing to help you enter glory, you work because you want to, not because you have to.
Religion tells you you must work to earn your way, Christianity says there's nothing you can do to earn your way, so Christ had to do it for you.
They literally use a fog machine at this circus of a church.
Might be a little extra but the message is good
@@412kev2 no its not.
@@thesecretstation :)
Ro 1:21 "For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened". According to Paul, Jesus was telling him what to say or write [Gal 1:1], but Paul did by own admission also adduce in his letter also own opinions, commands, demands, wishes, etc. I now wonder if the author of 1:21 [or 1:18-32] was God or Paul.
I think that this verse and many others verses in Paul's letters, came from Paul; for biblical God cannot, according to his alleged word, fail in anything he tries to achieve. So, when God calls you or makes you his possession or gives you knowledge of him, you remain his possession and retain the knowledge imparted by God into you forever. If not, then God labored in vain. So, Paul was as stupid as it gets! For my own sake, i do not conflate God or gods and their so-called holy books or the 'holy' books and the clergy or the clergy and most believers.
Believing in any god does not have to lead to or cause harm even to one person. But i do think that all religions do a lot of wrongs against each other and the unbelievers. I also would not ever participate in any debate of any religion. Religions have to do with mythology or fantasies; which cannot ever be proved or disproved to be true or not true, but yet easily prove that all of them are evil in some ways.
Is God and/or his word the only and best teacher? No, not according to all or almost all believers in Jesus or NT God. Is the NT God also the best and the only healer? No, the IT is not the best healer, according to some people.
Had the IT told every person who ever lived and is telling all of us even now that we are free to choose or not to choose the IT as their Savior.
And then told us not to fear any punishment for making the 'wrong' [in eyes of clergy, but not ever the IT] choices? NT [and OT] believers more or a lot more scared of the clergy than the IT? After all, the IT is out of sight, thus also in very dim light.
And clergy watch and watch you and wondering if you are joyfully giving them your money!
God's [and other spooks'] residence in total darkness; thus, the IT still not able to find the Satan and other undesirable spooks? Or the IT [god] too lonely; thus, wants company? I am dying to find out what's 'happening' up or down there. Btw, nothing can happen up or down there; for even time does not happen.