Don't Believe in Noah's Flood? You Might Have a Case of Geological Myopia
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
- Despite the number of large-scale, catastrophic events we have witnessed in recent history, many geologists are reluctant to accept the reality of a worldwide Flood in the days of Noah, or that certain geologic features were formed rapidly. Why is this? Paleontologist Dr. Kurt Wise thinks this might have something to do with something called "Geological Myopia"?
𝘐𝘴 𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴 𝘏𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺? is a documentary series that reveals how science intersects with the Bible. In over a hundred videos, scientists and scholars explore the evidence for creation in six normal days, a real Adam and Eve, a global Flood, a tower of Babel, plus hundreds of other fascinating aspects of God’s creation. Dr. Del Tackett serves as your guide in this amazing series that has impacted millions of people worldwide.
#kurtwise #creationism #youngearth #geology
- - - - - - - - - - -
If you want to purchase a copy of the film and our entire library of creation-affirming content, check out the 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘦 𝘊𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘉𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘭𝘦 at our website! You can do so by clicking here: bit.ly/2A7Pd2Z.
Don't forget to check out our web store for 15+ hours of videos, books and other resources as well: bit.ly/2A7Pd2Z
- - - - - - - - - - -
Also, be sure to browse around our channel. There, you can find videos from our 𝘉𝘦𝘺𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘐𝘴 𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴 𝘏𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺? series, as well as in-depth technical lectures given by creation scientists.
- - - - - - - - - - -
To find out how you can support our ministry, click the link here:
isgenesishisto...
- - - - - - - - - - -
Finally, if you prefer to read articles with a curated video collection, we have lots of free resources at our website: bit.ly/3idgpi7
We hope you enjoy the film!
- - - - - - - - - - -
"For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse." Romans 1:20
----------------------------------------------------
✨ Looking to learn more about Genesis and Creation?
🦕 Visit our blog for helpful articles: bit.ly/3d306R1
🍃 Free Videos: bit.ly/3e1HRgc
🌌 Questions & Answers: bit.ly/3d0EG6T
I grew up on the Beaches of Washington State, playing in the sands as the tides drained out, and flooded in. I have done many many experiments in my childhood, which "experts" don't do until they've already wasted many years of their lives, and then they do very narrow experiments in their artificial world of labs ... also fun, but missing the other things which happen when water floods, surges, and drains away. As one flies out of Albuquerque NM Westward bound in the morning from the airliner, one can look down, as ascending and see that all of the terrain below was created on a gigantic scale using the same water effects of quick flooding and erosion, creating the same features which I created many times as a child with buckets of water, or trapped dams of tide water on sandy beaches. When driving from Zion NP, UT to Las Vegas, again, the features are massive flood effects, and likewise from Las Vegas to Barstow, CA. Across the earth, at the base of dormant past volcanic mountains which reach the seas and oceans, one can see how the water has carved away their sides and even under-cut them, as evidence of how shortly ago these mountains were formed and eroded. There is much evidence of rock continuing to be formed in only decades, with man-made objects entombed in recent rock, such as the pick-axe. On a mining cave tour in South Dakota, we were told how stalactites took immense quantities of time to be formed, yet I could see on the wooden roof supports growing stalactites which were inches long, grown in just 50 years, rather than the millions of years the experts declare. Since cement requires only hours to become rock, is there any wonder that making rocks without human help takes only a few decades, instead of millions of years. Nearly everywhere across the world, human eyes can see the signs of catastrophic floods, greater than any regional flood that mankind has ever seen, and for centuries after Noah's flood, before the land became covered over in places by great forests, Noah's flood results were easily seeable by every human, but not so strangely, humans prefer to live where plants cover-over the obvious signs of Noah's flood, since plants provide food for humans, but barren rock does not. We, in our myopic, near-sighted, survival level mindset, don't naturally look at the "big-picture", until we reach adulthood, when we seek education, which is just brain-washing by Darwinian geologists, biologists, and social scientists. As a small child, I thought that everyone older knew more then me, which was true; but only after many decades of study, and far later than I should have been told, I learned that most teachers and professors had just average intelligence, and that what they taught as truth was being taught by them as a parrot repeats words that he has heard, or a monkey can be trained to repeat the many steps of basic brain-surgery which a human taught him, but neither has the knowledge and discernment needed to prove what the parrot says or recreate from nothing the advanced steps of brain-surgery. Likewise is true of most professors at universities, these days; they have nothing but "wrote" words mimicked from someone else, with the exceptions of those of the so called "hard" sciences such as mathematics and chemistry; this is not to say that the persons don't have the ability to use discernment, but rather that they don't as a rule.
lol
Well done! Should be sufficient for a dissertation, and start learning Swedish, because the Nobel Prize is waiting for you.
What a load of rubbish
@@guygifford : Judging by the above moronic replies to your piece, no doubt from eminent evolutionary scientists, you are on to something.
Until the American people start waking up to the reality that they have been lied to about so much on so many subjects, it is impossible for them to wrap their heads around this stuff!!
Geological Myopia, the same as Biological Myopia (faith in Common Descent) is due to these:
"He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them." --John 12:40
"In whom the god of this world [Satan] hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them. For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord;" --2 Corinthians 4:4
Hallelujah!!!
LoL
You're being far too kind. Sure, there are many that just blindly believe the so-called experts.
However, many more choose the myopia as an excuse to deny God's existence...
The bible teaches a flat earth, yet 400 years ago people chose to believe the "intellectuals". Instead of believing our senses and proof in front of our face. People refuse to comprehend that the deception is indeed STRONG.
God warned us about the changing of laws and times by the beast.
In "Already Gone", Ken Ham claims that (at Christian colleges) Theology majors are More likely to believe in old earth than Science majors. Strrong evidence that is kept suppressed
As former devout Christian, Noah's flood is just one of the reasons I no longer believe. In so much that this story is based on earlier regional stories, it also would have resulted in the destruction of the planet given what apologists claim. Ask yourself simple questions. Like, how could they possibly have known that the ENTIRE world was covered in water? Doesn't it make more sense that their ENTIRE world was the immediate geographic location in which they lived flooded? Taking all the animals, that they owned, onto a boat to save them from a flood in an area prone to flooding makes more sense, yes? Given the physical world, the logistics of such a story are untenable. Do yourself a favor. Go look into why this story is parable and not factual. Doesn't mean you lose your faith. Doesn't mean you shouldn't believe in God. It means you look at God's world with your eyes open.
How about theological myopia. Everything has to agree with a man made Iron Age book. Science is ignored in favour of rehashed ancient Middle East myths.
@@jamgill9054 You say it doesn't mean you lose your faith or you shouldn't believe in God.
Is it ok to believe God created the world and universe? Or that a virgin conceived? Or that Jesus was raised from the dead? If we can believe these things, why can we not believe in a global flood?
The proliferation of confirmation bias amongst the geological community has been as disaster for science for so very long, especially with all that dating methods that base their initial values on suppositions based on their original biases. Thank you for fighting against it.
The most logical answer to that is rebellion to authority and wanted to living without accountability.
Ah yes, another global conspiracy
@@chadamongmen5223Chad on the case, eh?
@@chadamongmen5223Confirmation bias doesn't require any outward conspiracy. It is simply seeing only what you expect to see and NOT being open to (at least, certain kinds of) skepticism that would let you self-correct.
@@chadamongmen5223 well you sound like a perfect example of what he was saying about bias lol.
Thank you, Dr. Wise. Excellent presentation as always 👏🏻
I remember going to New Mexico and seeing, from elevation, an area that looked like an enormous drainage gulley. It stood out. And I knew
I always find it highly amusing when people tend to believe in science until it contradicts their extreme religious beliefs. Then attempting to cherry pick parts of scientific evidence only to come up with a hypothesis that none of the world experts in the field agree with.
Or, he is willing to teach what the college demands he teach if he wants a paycheck. That and he must play the part, on and off stage.
@@philharris5848 : So what did he say that was wrong?
@@GusShrednyMt St Helens was a massive volcanic eruption , localised in effect. Not a flood. Pretty simple really.
The consensus of world experts in geology and geography say a flood of the entire planet to the depth quoted in the Bible is totally impossible. Biologists have said that Noah's Arc would only be big enough for the food of 2 junior elephants for a year. Also expert boat builders made a large scale replica Arc and tried to sail it, but they couldn't stop it leaking. Apparently wooden ships can only be built up to a certain size because wood flexes and causes them to sink. There are of course a huge list of other problems, but I think you get my point.
Like cherry picking parts of the bible to believe or not believe. Whatever the current consesus is on the bible, that is what is preached. And you want to be taken seriously?
Thank you for sharing. :)
I think it has more to do with people being very comfortable in their lives of sin and they do not want to hear the truth...
what truth
Sin is a transgression against divine law. There doesn't appear to be any divine law givers. Therefore, sin is a moot word.
Love when science supports the evidence! Love it when scientists follow the evidence and lets it tell the story. Great presentation! Thank you!
Young Earth = Flat Earth. Pure nonsense
I share everything I can find that Dr. Wise puts out with my family. He’s an excellent source of knowledge and he’s usually animated when speaking about how you can see God in his wonderful creation.
Because he is a creation driven geologist who's scientific integrity is flawed because of his belief? Do most geologists agree with him?
That's daft .There'd be wiser than him, out chewing grass.
I feel sorry for your family.
@fletcherlewis Not if they want to keep their jobs, not get published, not qualify for grant money, not have their names in prestigious journals, not keep a roof over their heads, not eat, and not if they want to be invited to leave fellowship bodies. If those were the conditions for getting into university, most students would deny their own mothers just to get a seat at the table - or not get an education. It's called peer pressure. Bit like the Hollywood thing: deny God, drink blood, swear allegiance to Satan, you'll get a glittering career. Stand alone, expect the full weight of Hollywood against you. People get thrown out all the time for finding evidence they weren't supposed to find. Or get careers stomped on after they do. There are over 30,000 scientists worldwide you won't find on those "acceptable" lists precisely for that reason - they broke the silence and published at great cost.
@@fletcherlewis proof of your claim. Need your refutation of his presentation, how can we trust a random person spouting non substantiated claims.
I love your content, but you pretty much ruined my experience with most of the other geologists...
And that's perfectly fine with me!!
As a believer, I find it hard to listen to many of those in your profession.
I didn't realize that geology was such a young science.
dr wise hello and thank you for another wonderful video great stuff ! and very well done ! i enjoy a lot ! being very much a believer myself i really appreciate all your work and effort and videos
Looking through the lens of the Bible can correct the Myopia!
There is noting in the bible about optics - The Earth is 4.5 BILLION YEARS OLD
or worsen it
Looking through the Bible lens produces a kaleidoscope image that tricks the imagination.
Like looking through rose colored glasses
Sunday School ended for you many decades ago … please grow up …
He still learns science from children books. That's why he's a Flat-Earther/Science-Denier
Do you even have a conscience ? What a scam...
Mile wide boulders? Seems like that kind of thing could be independently verified.
How did the surface of the earth not melt if radioactive decay was happing a milion times faster?
Their god was blowing on it to cool it down?
@@jeffbybee5207 how do you cool down a nuclear reactor? Submerge it in water.
I don't buy there was any rapid decay. You ever see the Proton Labs Z-pinch experiments? They were working on fusion and when they made the isotopes like they use for dating methods. The parent daughter elements ratio was like what we see today.
@@jeffbybee5207 off topic. But also covered in the video.
If you examine the sedimentation rates for the major Land masses and the large river deltas, if they had been doing that for billions of years, they would have filled up the oceans long ago. The earth can't be more than several thousand years old.
@@sammcrae8892Zirkon probes withvUranium Lead tell you something different and there are multiple different materials that allow you to determine the conditions and verify your age.
"Find the facts that agree with your feelings. There can NOT be a God because then I would have to obey Him."
If He created everything, then He owns everything, and He can make the rules, not me.
I simply obey him because the mess I made was an earth shaking disaster. I had no problem believing I was a sinner. It was a little hard to think Jesus would love such a rebel.
2:50 Q. Why didn’t the consequences of one volcanic eruption change geological principles? A. because it was one eruption. Volcanology and geology are well understood. Catastrophic events do occur, but they are localised. You can’t extrapolate these conditions to change whole world geology.
4:00 Graded bedding. Big long spiel here about timescales for sedimentation. So what. If you want to find the time a particular sedimentary layer formed, radio date an igneous rock above and below and interpolate rather than speculate!
26:00 Now he’s suggesting that a flood, which he has not shown to be global, will accelerate radioactive decay. This is nonsense and would have to break the laws of physics. The heat generated would vaporise all water then go on to melt the earth’s crust. That would be a catastrophic event!
35:00 Sand nowhere near a beach. Perfectly natural geological explanation. Go look it up. He is looking at current maps, without considering how the continents drifted away from Pangaea.
Basically forty minutes of the same old stuff that has been refuted numerous times by mainstream science.
Many things wrong with noahs flood ,chinese calender is older , no records of flood in aisia or europe on bibles timeline , caves and caverns around the world showing ancient drawings thousands of years old , massive caverns as big as towns under volcanos , all would be filled up with debris and skeletons but there not 👍
don't be ruining the narrative with facts and logic
Always enjoyable to learn from Kurt Wise!
To learn what? How NOT to interpret the Bible?
If you first realize that the "entire world" is actually referring to the known world, or more specificly the world known to the author.
Then yes, Noah flood did happen and in fact happened many times.
Actually the reason geologists don't accept a global flood only 4400 years ago is called *intellectual honesty.*
Are you sure about that? Are you sure YEC is not a wild cult?
Oh, I believe it. I believe that everything in God's word is true. ❤✝️
Learn to read it then. If you are YoungEarther/FlatEarther it means you are NOT doing a good job
Great presentation. I really enjoy your detailed explanations.
Denying the evidence against a global flood just to keep a book accurate, is an insult to humanity. It happening or not also have no affect what so ever on your god existing. It's just utter ignorance that people continue to follow this path.
So students are taught to believe in long term, that can not be viewed. And to disregard that which can be viewed. Typical atheist view of life.
Wow! so, it seems the ancient prophets meant exactly what they said about the cyclical dotl when earth shifts to line up with ''the Master when He returns from His long journey!''
What about the three layers that cover the entire globe?
Explain that...
Redbed, Grey clay, and black fall out. The Triassic Era
I e often wondered if there was not as much water on the planet before the flood. What if it was a moon size ice comet that dissipated in the atmosphere and greatly and suddenly increased the amount of water on the planet.
How did you miss this?
The WA Ice Age flood wasn't a single event. They estimate it was somewhere between a dozen to thirty plus foods over several hundred to thousands of years. The ice dam formed somewhere in the Cabinet Gorge where the present day Clark Fork river flows from Missoula, to lake pend Oreille, and on to the mighty Columbia river and eventually the Pacific Ocean.
This should be sufficient evidence to explain the differentiated radiometric dating in the rhythmic layering.
Don't confuse the sheep with scientific facts.
@@sciencerules2825 This particular fact reinforces the feature he was talking about by explaining that catastrophism is still the method of deposition and the number of floods over a relatively short period of time geologically speaking could account for the variance in the radiometric dating.
@@bpuryea Wrong. The speed at which a geologic formation develops has zero effect on any radiometric dating of the formation. Did you even bother to think that through?
@@sciencerules2825 yeah, too bad you havent.
@@bpuryea OK, I read your statement wrong. I though you were talking about speed of formation affecting radiometric decay rate, not the actual measured date determined by radiometric means. My bad.
I thought this was a great video . Great information. Thank you . Blessings
You gave the BEST lecture on Noah’s flood! Your excitement of the subject was enjoyable to watch. Bless you, brother.🙏🏼😁👍🏼
… that lecture was several years ago. I still watch rewatch it from time to time. Good to see you that you are still at it.
Thank you for this excellent presentation! I always enjoy listening to Dr. Wise speak. He makes learning about geology interesting!
To have everlasting life you absolutely must trust in the person and finished work of Christ alone for salvation ❤️ this means that saving repentance is turning from unbelief to belief.
You either believe that Jesus paid your sin debt in full or you don't.
How does one believe in something with zero evidence. Ancient writings by ancient men copied numerous times and compiled into the Bible and called the word of God.
This is beyond pathetic.
@@garyb6219 yes your right to go through all this trouble to justify a magic sky daddy that killed everyone while putting animals on a boat that never existed is pathetic
When your channel name is "Is Genesis real?"
This is a text book confirmation bias.
Most “experts” and/or “academics” will do anything to deny the biblical record of the world deluge catastrophe.
They don't need to do anything. They just follow the evidence.
Sorry that it shows that the biblical flood is a myth.
I think Dr. Wise meant to say 1922, not 1822.
Where did Noah put 2 termites?.....in a wooden cage😂
I'm not certain, but I don't think Noah took insects, at least not intentionally. Some surely hitched a ride. Others could have survived on floating mats of vegetation and debris, of which there were surely many.
@@KenJackson_US noah's flood never happened.
@@adamrspears1981 Then how do you explain the continent-scale fossil-bearing miles-deep hydraulically-sorted layers (strata) of sediment that cover the whole earth if not from the worldwide flood? (Did you watch this video?)
@@KenJackson_US How do I explain fossils scattered through out the globe?
Oh boy, you picked a toughy.......hmmm, let me see......oh I know! There's fossils everywhere because life's been on this planet for millions upon millions of years!
Next question...
@@adamrspears1981 I asked about *sediment.* You answered about the fossils from the flood. Tell me about the *sediment.*
Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today.
The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is:
Sunrise to sunset
Sunset to next sunset
Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ).
We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast. I work the day shift. (Both are not 24 hours)
Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains".
Gen. 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens”
The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours.
Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists.
I so enjoy your videos!
A global flood is physically impossible and violates even the crudest notions of common sense. And no, the book of Genesis isn't history - it's mythology. That's not to say that a myth doesn't have value, it does - but not in a literal historical sense.
God bless yall
Giant Biblical trees. We've been lied to over and over.
Yes! Giant Trees as tall as mountains, Flat-Earth, Young-Earth, Annunaki - UNITE!
Nonsense-Christian Cults could be the name
I asked an ardently atheist coworker how he could believe that nothing created everything. He quickly replied, "it's been reproduced in a lab." I then asked, "in a what?" He said, "in a lab". I asked again, "in a what?" He said, in a la...." The light dawned on his face; a "lab" isn't "nothing"!
I believe your examples can be explained by events like glacial flooding but for the sake of argument lets say there was a global flood- where is the evidence for a man in the sky that orchestrated such an event?
41:55 Come on Dr. Wise, where’s your optimism? 😂
Dr. Wise is my favorite flood scientist. I have a geologist as an older brother. I've heard the old earth, long process evolutionary model all my life. It's great to see the well thought out counter to that argument as food for thought and debate. Thank you.
Oooookay. New Earth Creationism is back on my radar. I’ve been giving the old earthers the benefit of the doubt for decades and every time I turn around they’re scrambling to explain something weird. *No amount of scrambling’s getting them out of this.*
This series isn't meant to change your mind.
"No amount of scrambling’s getting them out of this."
Out of WHAT?
@@thomasmaughan4798 That’s there’s no possible explanation for this other than a flood. This is *completely* unanticipated by their model.
@@wkrapek Of course there was a flood. Floods are routine events. What is less likely is covering the entire earth to a depth of Mount Everest, with the single exception that an olive tree appears to have been unharmed.
Global warmists assert that if all the ice melted, the sea would rise about 100 meters. That would certainly flood some lowlands.
Baghdad is 35 meters above sea level.
But of course, a magical God can do anything, including creating enough water to cover mount everest, and protect an olive tree, and then vanish all that water. but if that's going to be the argument, then what is to say we haven't actually been created yet? This is some sort of practice run? Or maybe we were created five minutes ago complete with implanted memories of having viewed this youtube channel?
Ancient books as the Mahabharata from India and the Popol Vuh from the Maya tell us that our planet suffers from a cycle of seven natural disasters. Those disasters are best known as the Great Flood or the End of Days. After such a disaster, where many living beings die, a new civilization arises slowly. The survivors tell their new born children about this disaster and how it occurred. There was a serpent in the sky or a red dragon. There were floods and fires, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. And a bombardment of fiery meteorites, hailstones. The sun, moon and stars were not visible for a long time. The survivors also knew that sooner or later this could happen again. But when? The fear for this most dramatic event in the history of mankind was and is exploited by priests. They told the people that the disasters were an act of God. And the people did not worship HIM well enough. This is how religion originated. For creationists the last flood that occurred in the year 3,644 BCE is THE flood. In fact there have been hundreds and more will come. And we know when. We explain much more about the cycle of recurring floods, the rebirth of civilizations and its timeline, ancient high technology and alien deities in the eBook: "what I know about Nibiru". This book shows abundant and convincing evidence in text and many depictions. You can read it on every computer, tablet or smartphone. Search: about nibiru roest
It's some time now that I do not believe the "Noah's flood account" I now KNOW for sure it happened.
Excellent video and I likd in the comments how some people say this could have been aI local flood? Well God would have just told Noah and his family to go to higher ground. Or a different area. Also many different countries and native peope in all areas of the globe have a great flood story in there traditions and stories of eight people on a boat. Which is why I starting studying more into Gods word.
Doug Vogt's interpretation vis a vis this aspect of the Nova event is strengthened by this evidence. Diehold Foundation, series 4; watch them all, your government has. Then consider S4488, and why they amended it a couple of weeks after Vogt contacted them to inform them of certain aspects they had overlooked. From that, you may surmise that he knew that they knew that he knew that they knew that he knew more than they did. RIP Doug Vogt
Even the Hawaiian people have a flood myth and long before they came in contact with the outside world. The ruins here on Kauai Hawaii could be pre flood. Thousands of acres of terracing and massive pyramid shaped structures. It looks much older than they say it is.
My degree Environmental Science... now I know run (albeit indirectly) by the Jesuits. Liverpool 🇬🇧
There was a flood in Tennessee last week so there must have been a worldwide flood last week!
Why does this matter? There are well known examples of rapid change eg when Great Britain became an island, but rapid change does not account for many observations
Do not give up hope. Nuclear decay is govern by the weak force. The city interaction of the weak force particle is the nutrino, one of the least understood particle in phyics.
A break through in physic could change the radioactive decay factor.
The natural uranium reactor in Africa hints that radioactive decay properties could have changed over time
Love your lectures Kurt. Wish we could get you out to our Church for a big Creation Conference
All the atheists saying there is no evidence of the global flood are on UA-cam shorts, meanwhile...
bring on the empty claims
Are you implying that science is best communicated in 30 second videos over long form videos? (Trying to understand your point.)
@@Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n It's just what I see...
@@warnerchandler9826 I don't think you can understand much in 30 seconds.
@@wesleycolemanmusic I don't think you can learn much if you think you have all the answers.
Can you site your evidence for the accelerated radioactive decay far in the past ? Having worked with half-life equations and implications for accurate measurement, I have never seen a deviation that would even come close to suggesting that decay rates slow down with time. The only component that slows down is the creation of decay products, as with each cycle of 1/2 life decay, only 1/2 of the material remains to decay further.
Even if there was a great flood it does nothing to prove the noahs ark story. Also there is some debate about the epic of gilgamesh story which although not exactly the same bears some resemblance to the noahs ark story and may even predate it or at least parts of the gilgamesh. There are even theories that both stories had their roots in even older stories. Regardless of which predated which i dont believe any of the two . I dont have any problems there may have been a global flood if there is enough evidence or even the noahs ark story.
I totally believe in Jesus and the Father and the Holy Ghost but I don't believe a at all in the great flood!
Cool but most of the stuff you said i have no idea
I did the soil and water in a mason jar experiment with my second son who is now 25 years old, back when he was about nine. Formed quite a few layers within a week. 😊
A lot of similar evidence is given for the Eye of the Sahara having gone through a similar type of event. I totally agree with your theory.
Wise indeed. The coming solar Nova will demonstrate to the survivors the extremely rapid rate of change in our environment.
If God's word declares it, I believe it.
where is word
You’re god didn’t right anything it been right by humans, why god didn’t do his self ? 😊
@@Kebekwoodcraft7375 because of reasons
Mr wise describes the rythmites of being downstream of the walawa gap when they were up stream of the gap that created iirc lake grace that would take a few weeks to drain
Well presented, thankyou. Only the desire to ignore a Creator, and be free of that pesky person keeps the truth at bay... very sad
The problem with accelerated decay is heat. As the Alpha and Beta decay happens it releases quite a lot of energy that heats up the environment. How do you account for this energy release?
It's not just the heat which is a huge problem for creationists. Cramming 4.5 billion years' of radioactive decay into 1 year would release enough deadly alpha, beta, and gamma radiation to fry every living thing on the Ark 1000X over. 😮
Bible myopia would be more accurate.
Greatly appreciate everything you do. Thank you very much.
At 35 minutes what formation or formations are you claiming is one sandstone?
Your work is a great service. My eyes have been opened and now I see and understand.
Missoula Floods!!! How can you not know that?
Physics, history, geology, archaeology.... and READING.
Yes. It's Missoula *FLOODS* , plural. Up to several dozen episodes of ice dams forming and breaking over many thousands of years.
@@voiceofreason162 I suggest you delete all of your posts. By engaging like you are you are basically questioning your faith. That cannot be allowed to happen. How do you know I'm not Satan, testing you? You are on very shaky ground here. Seek your minister and ask for help.
Pretty sure no one taught you that effects of volcanic eruptions happen very slowly...
So much happiness and joy $47k weekly returns has been life changing. AWESOME GOD I now have a house and can now afford anything for my family even with my Retirement..
wow this awesome 👏 I'm 37 and have been looking for ways to be successful, please how??
Okay but now please tell us where in the Bible it says "and then God made a 4 km thick glacier cover a large part of the earth"? Or is there another reasonable explanation for the striations on bedrock and the giant boulders scattered around like somebody dropped them from the sky? And was the ice age sometime in the last 6000 years?
Good timing. I'm putting a post together right now with real-world data showing how fast that 4km layer was laid. Look up my post in an hour on my Community Page. Judge for yourself.
PS: it's there. Call it a 50-year science experiment.
The answer is rapid precipitation snap-frozen on landing, rapidly relayering the ice. That's demonstrable from the data and the fossils. Mammoths have been found in the north with every bone in their bodies broken in a standing position, still chewing cud when they died. They were pummelled by falling ice hail. And rapidly buried, still standing, because the sheer volume prevents them teetering over. Mammoths stood up to 18ft tall at the shoulder.
12 minutes in, and all i have learned is that we were taught that things take a long time, and mt st Helen's did thing quickly.
We have covered it 5 times now...
MSH didn't create any of the geologic features (i.e vertically incised switchback river meanders) known to take million of years.
The speed of sound is faster in hard materials, like rock.
The speed of sound is in air. You have no speed of sound in rock.
Any alternative explanation to explain the teaching that 100+ million years of radioactive carbon dating can only be scientifically accomplished through means other than waiting 100+ million years?
@JoeC There are some important facts about Carbon14 to consider. It has a very short half life, so it can only produce dates of up to about 80,000 years. Coal tends to produce dates of 40,000 to 60,000 years. But this assumes that the levels of Carbon14 in the atmosphere at the time the trees grew was the same then as now.
But Dr. Russell Humphreys has determined that the earth's magnetic field has a half life of about 1400 years. A stronger magnetic field would have deflected more cosmic rays away 5,000 years ago. This would result in a lower Carbon14 starting point and give us an age that is much older than the Coal really is.
State Farm isn't sure that catastrophic events are rare, at least in Florida 😅
Thank you Dr. Wise for your teachings that others won't do. The truth prevails!
What if: Others don't do this lessons because they are pure nonsense
Is that a possibility?
Shout out to Randall Carlson for really getting people to start seeing this massive flood theory
Randall Carlson isn’t talking about a world wide flood. There is no evidence of a global flood. The ark is a myth.😊
Appreciate you! Thank you
All the viewers here would do well to look at the Sumerian story of the flood and the Ark. Dr Irving Finkel, British Museum has done much of the work on this including decyphering the original text and participating in the construction of a replica. The biblical story of the flood and the Ark is so obviously a rip off of a much older story and a poor one at that.
@littlewink There are hundreds of flood stories from around the world. The Bible provides the best description of a large vessel that could transport all the necessary animals. It is therefore the most likely original. Moses wrote the book of Genesis from historic materials.
And your PhD supervisor was Stephen Jay Gould. How do you justify your PhD in paleontology?
The data and methodology is not in dispute. It's the interpretation of the data. And, Gould was a pretty open minded evolutionist often challenging some of its sacred assumptions.
He studied and completed the work and knows a lot about fossils about geology. Rather then trying to attack his credentials, why not study his arguments?
@@truthisbeautiful7492 Have studied creationist arguments, from flat-earth to Intelligent Design, for two decades now. Have done a thesis on it. I can assure you that creationists do a good job of turning Christian believers into atheists, more effective than Richards Dawkins.
@@truthisbeautiful7492He misled Gould.
@@mugdiller2124 My point is that a PhD is a very serious piece of academic work, which you sign with your name. You lay out your sincere work of a couple of years, and you 100% agree with and affirm what you have written. His PhD thesis deals with some specific forms of dinosaurs which lived more than 100 million years ago. And of course, it deals with the process of evolution. Wise basically lied, because he didn't believe what he has written in his thesis. His PhD from Harvard gives him credibility, and he is happy to use it.
He shouldn't call himself a Christian.
Any creationist who wants to be taken seriously needs to demonstrate all the geologic formations shown in this video and all the sediments deposits worldwide *were formed at the same time by the same event* only 4400 years ago. Not that they were formed by many separate local events over the last several hundred million years as the evidence indicates.
Are you listening? Global distribution of sequential sedimentary layers is explained elsewhere.
I wonder how Iceland and Hawaii formed so fast after the flood? Aren't they mostly igneous rock, where's all the flood sediment?
Lol Noah's flood is nuts people please stop lying to children about history and science
@@steventhompson399 the continents rose as water drained off… and mountains grew. You need to watch the entire Flood series, and Mountains After the Flood.
TMI for one short lecture.
@@steventhompson399A great deal of volcanic activity happened after the flood. It generated the aerosols needed to keep the earth cool so snow could last after it fell from hypercanes. When the oceans cooled down, the needed evaporation dropped off, leading to the glaciers melting.
@@appaloosa42 where i live there are none sedimentary rocks now how you deal with that
You can't carbon date a rock!
Nobody ever said you could!
You can, but not for determining the age of the rock.
They don’t. They mainly use Uranium-Lead dating for igneous rocks.
You can carbon date coal and fossils found in the rock. Because old age geologists believe that the rocks are millions of years old, they haven't considered using Carbon14 dating. As long as they refuse to do real science because of their beliefs, they will continue to come up with millions of imaginary years.
@@roblangsdorf8758 You don't have the faintest clue how radiocarbon works, do you?
Thanks for doing this!
You should do a debunking video of amonra and his X disproves noahs flood.
Or, just try to prove the flood.
how about genesis 1:9? When God separates water and land
Dr. John Walton could answer this.
There's nothing to learn from Young-Earthers
Richard Dawkins said Kurt Wise destroyed his career because religion, i am watching a great man of God teaching LIFE, teaching WORD OF GOD, a souls's fisher, what is a medíocre career compared to this?
Richard Dawkins is correct. If any of this was true, he would publish it.
@@markb3786 everything published is correct?
Sir if you don't believe in GOD keep it to yourself.
Why? A man accosted me in my Ralph's grocery store parking lot wanting to know if I believed in God. He feels no compunction to keep his beliefs to himself.
Is the "Heat Problem" reflected in the research going on at Mt St Helens? What evidence, if any speaks to rapid cooling OR contrary to it, in the new rocks formed at the eruption sight and affected areas? It's the radio active decay affected significantly?
The things that make me believe in the flood that i can see is all around the world there is sand on the coast lines when the water retreated into the depths of the land ,and in my garden and many places i find rounded rocks stones but if you were to smash rocks you would not get a rounded one and i know when i was a builder i use to clean the mixer out with rocks and after a time there would go rounded. If the animals died millions of years ago then where did the soil come from that buried them.
_If the animals died millions of years ago then where did the soil come from that buried them._ Please go read up on the *geologic rock cycle.* New soil is being continuously created from the erosion of mountains and land surfaces while old sediment is being continuously recycled by tectonic plate subduction.
That is a really good question and is related to the rock cycle as stated in the other comment. There is universally accepted evidence (except by creationists) that there have been many generations of mountain belts that have formed and been eroded flat and this is the ultimate source of sediment that fills the sedimentary basins.
You should have teamed up with that lady from the Wendy's commercials in the 1980s. "Where's the beach?"
Geology ROCKS 🎸
Sincere conversations = Sincere answers
btw Young Earth = Flat Earth, both 100% science-deniers
You lie about the geologic column in this video. You can't throw out radiometric dating because you don't like the dates.
@Joedaven He is not lying. Get a copy of the RATE (Radioactive and the Age of The Earth) study that was completed about 2005. It will provide many insights into the problems with radiometric dating.
@@roblangsdorf8758 The RATE study has gone down in history as being one of the worst pieces of pseudoscience garbage ever produced. As an example, their claimed Accelerated Nuclear Decay (AND) would not only produce enough heat to melt the planet it would also produce enough radiation to kill all life on the Ark 1000X over.