He sounds like he recovered from the stroke well. Glad to see him back to 100%. It was hard to see Richard slurring his words and struggling to speak after he had the stroke. Such a wordsmith should never have to endure that.
You can see it has left a slight mark in the difference between the way the left- and right-halves of his mouth move. It's subtle, but it's there if you look. But you're right, it's great to see him back.
in my state (a christian state in india) churches are taking initiatives creating awareness about climate change for the past few years and we have no problem teaching evolution to students despite our beliefs , i'm surprised that in such a developed country (USA) these are still a major issue , i feel like politicians are encouraging ignorance among christians .
sach kin As I understand its not the whole of US which has this problem its mainly some backwater southern states or among those mormon types.. As for India the issue is different we are more concerned about history and religion. If u go to the northern states like Rajasthan or Gujarat the right wing ideology is very visible in history books. Then again the reason y climate change and evolution is not touched to an extent is cos most of the syllabuses material is from the central govt which changes every now and then all schools including christian and state schools adopt that syllabus
They're already collecting the books for the Donald J. Trump Presidential Library. 34 coloring books, 100,000 copies of The Art of the Deal, one copy of The Turner Diaries, 1 bound copy of his tweets and a space reserved for the transcripts of his impeachment hearings. Oh, can't forget about the wall art....50 portraits of Trump by 50 different artists. It'll be the greatest presidential library ever!
You forgot. There's also one copy of the Trump Bible, the size of a room. In it, you can find brilliant passages like Two Corinthians, "The Best Part", and "Somewhere In There."
Hitler you were not a Christian, you hated Christianity plus you hated Atheism but loved Islam but what are you an idiot being an Atheist you hated Atheists and even loved Mystics
Due to access to information online, there will be more and more Dawkins-like people being created than before. The conspiracy nuts are louder and more numerous, but behind the scenes I'm sure that there are so many young people like myself that utilise youtube and google as the endless library that geniuses of the past would have killed for to access for one single day.
Since his stroke, Richard is looking more and more healthy, which makes me really happy. He always has great points. Science and faith can never be compatible.
your so wrong, to be believe in science you must also have faith , imagine believing world started in bigbang, nobody saw it, but still athiest beleve, it takes faith to believe it.Science writer Lincoln Barnett, in his book, The Universe and Dr. Einstein, commented that the continuing discoveries of modern science have made it “more difficult” to ignore the idea of God (1959, 22), science and faith are compatible., religion believe their is gd in creation, and evoluyionist believe matter and energy collide, the bigbang create theuniverse., that is incompatible.
hungry worm Except, you're wrong. _"to be believe in science you must also have faith"_ You don't have to "believe in science". Science presents facts-- facts just _are._ They're not something you believe in. _"imagine believing world started in bigbang, nobody saw it, but still athiest beleve,"_ Bahaha. We have more than enough evidence to make the Big Bang a scientific theory. Again, it's not just believing. _We have reasons to think that this thing did happen._ That's like saying "Nobody saw dinosaurs, but still, people believe they existed!" Well holy fuck, I wonder what the thousands upon thousands of fossil records are? Same goes for things like the redshift of galaxies and expansion of the universe. We don't exactly know _how_ the Big Bang happened, but we know that it was what got the universe as we know it going. Wether or not the universe already was before the Big Bang-- that comes down to hypothesis. _"it takes faith to believe it."_ It takes faith to believe claims without evidence. The Big Bang, as I said, has evidence. _"Science writer Lincoln Barnett, in his book, The Universe and Dr. Einstein, commented that the continuing discoveries of modern science have made it “more difficult” to ignore the idea of God."_ And that proves anything..how? There are plenty of religious scientists. So? That doesn't mean they're in the right. Much less a "science writer" from the 50s. That was his opinion- which is not a fact. _"science and faith are compatible."_ Correct. _,"religion believe their is gd in creation,"_ Yes, which, if taken literally as it happened in the Bible would be objetively impossible and a ridiculous fable. It already is, anyway. _"and evoluyionist believe matter and energy collide,"_ You have an inherent misconception of what evolution is, it seems. The Big Bang is unrelated to evolution. Evolution is the process with which species develop. It doesn't attempt to explain _how_ the species got here in the first place. This doesn't help your case, bud. Evolutionists study the ways in which species evolve. It's not a belief, it's a fact. _"the bigbang create theuniverse.,"_ Again, unrelated. And for your information, there can be theists who also believe in evolution. The Catholic church publicly accepts it. _"that is incompatible."_ Well, duh. Of course science and mythology are incompatible. Facts are facts, tales aren't real.
@@shywarrior865 There are some questions we can't answer like - what was there before big bang, what is human consciousness, why are we here, etc. But because we can't answer does question does that mean jesus had super powers or that Mohammed flew down on a winged horse... no. Every single religion is man-made they are fictional stories.
@@shywarrior865 people don't believe in science like people believe in their religions, people who believe in science used to believe in reason = logic, so science just use logic to prove things then science become more reliable to these people then religion.
So believing we might have come from a god is crazier than believing me might have come from aliens...neither of which is rooted in science but Dawkins has made claims to the alien theory. I'm nit even religious but once u do your "own" research on evolution you will see that life is based on time+chance= life. Science is not based on chance.....but evolition is. How can evolution therefore be science?
Your question is answered in multiple books by Dawkins. Evolution is surprising and interesting because it has identifiable trends and we can predict its outcomes. It's the opposite of random chance.
@@JellyTrackmaster then u dont understand evolution. Do more research amd you will see the beginning of life is based ln chance....the first sequence of fhe first protien molecule is based on randomness and chance. Resesrch it. The theory of evolition has come a long way since Darwins study of fitches. And Dawkins believes we came from an intelligent life form....this form is Aliens. This is Dawkins God...Aliens....because he admits that we were made by something....just not a God....but Aliens. Research it.
@@garrydye2394 Funny how eager you are to tell someone they don't understand something, yet you're completely and utterly fucking confused and can barely form a coherent thought. And no, Dawkins' god isn't "aliens". Dawkins doesn't have a god. That's literally what atheism is.
linkone11 An evolutionary biologist is someone who dedicates their study to the evolutionary process, it’s not a redundant label. It’s a field which draws on other fields of biology to a specific end.
Yes, but Professor Dawkins use that title to further his educational agenda, of which I am complete agreement. If you have a scientific background, you know about lumpers and splitters, I will not go there, it's a long term argument in science; since you are watching this I will assume you know the basics of biological inquiry, the self correcting scientific method applies here; Darwin's Origin of Species set out the initial observational evidence that all of biology is grounded in the evolution of species; after 159 years of scrutiny it stands up; later evidence of Mendel, T.H. Morgan and Crick and Watson further supports the fact that evolution is the cornerstone of biology; that being said, I really like the Horny Fruit Flies name, wish I'd thought of that, when my son was 6 years old his first pets were fruit flies, when as an undergraduate I had to reproduce T.H. Morgan's fruit fly experiments
SC 105.1 God never asks us to believe, without giving sufficient evidence upon which to base our faith. His existence, His character, the truthfulness of His word, are all established by testimony that appeals to our reason; and this testimony is abundant. Yet God has never removed the possibility of doubt. Our faith must rest upon evidence, not demonstration. Those who wish to doubt will have opportunity; while those who really desire to know the truth will find plenty of evidence on which to rest their faith. SC 105.2
Let's not forget that Egypt is also this way. You only have 3 religions to choose from. You're not allowed to be an atheist. So I'll be passing Dawkins info to someone who might need his help.
Eric I know they've been having riots and looting, but I didn't know about how limited their religious freedom was until recently. Then I started doing some research on it, and sadly I realized that my leg wasn't being pulled.
Tabbi Wytch...oppsy Richard Dawkins is not that smart that you thinking see it for your self. In the Islam religion he get fk up. Her is video see it for your self ua-cam.com/video/NJ_A-b0M-U4/v-deo.html.
corporations are pieced in papers to money for people the few top 1% own the most. That's what it means "corporations are people" if you never got it...
+saking91 Kingsley There is a profound difference between begrudgingly accepting that there are no first principles that are mathematically provable and proselytizing faith as a virtue.
@Keksi those that see no problem with religion have done far less research into religion than the wood lice whose excretions were hailed as "angels' tears". Those that have seen Bill's Religious, Richard's The Root of all Evil have seen far more research than evident in your comment.
Removing labels is a good beginning. One needs to behave properly with others, while addressing critical matters logically, and emotional matters with compassion.
I disagree evolution theory (with creationism) can be teach in philosophy class and evolution might be mentioned in a science class as a possible explanation. But it is still a theory not a fact as many believe and need much more evidence to be teach as so.
El Smith: You UK school system should be ashamed, there is not evidence to support evolution as fact and it is still a possible theory but not proven without a shadow of doubt.
loafer sheffield The Queen is technically the head of the Church of England.....and Dawkins is the God (person the pun) of atheists. He does deserve a knighthood. They gave one to bloody Mick Jagger.
well he is a scientist, and he knows more about the workings of animals and their neural capacities than most humans on the planet. if he doesn't already have the technical degree of neuro, i am confident that any neuroscientist alive would consider it a privilege for him to teach their class or accompany them in their research. his work in ethology is more than sufficient for him to have earned the degree.
Evolution, like all scientific phenomenons, doesn't rely on beliefs, but in observation and evidence, instead. Therefore, regarding evolution for instance, the term "believing" is incorrect. The right term to be utilized should be "agreement" or "acceptance" of it's existence as a biological fact.
I think it is fair to point out that while Islam does opress Islam, here in America they can be an opressed minority by Christians and the government. Whether by violence or travel bans. Now, what Dawkins, Bill, and Sam Harris do is not opressive. I agree with their criticisms 100 percent. But Muslims have more to worry about than just other Muslims, and I think it's important to acknowledge that.
The midde-east minority is in no way getting oppressed in America. Oppression takes place in the countries from which they run away in the first place. They have all the rights and freedoms here, none of which would be given to you if you went to their countries.That's oppression for you.
"Hijab and Burqa are considered liberating" Where are you seeing this among liberals? I never do, even though I hear people complaining about it a lot.
Follow the Damn Train CJ Last time I check wearing any clothing or coverings be it for religious reasons or secular are a human rights. You could choose to not to exercise it too. That is liberating. Just because they don't follow a fashion fad doesn't mean they are not liberating. Lol.
look here is the problem with your argument. you dont have evidence to support it. you believe they get oppressed but thats the end of it. where are the lists full of facts of violence against minorities from white christian people? where are the recorded facts of subjugation? you can even be president in the united states as a minority. the most powerful man in the world. where is this oppression you speak of? ive never seen it and i live in germany with around 40% foreigners in my city. ive never ever seen it. ive never seen facts about it. ive never seen evidence. and i would never turn a blind eye to it. but i am a man of facts and not wishful thinking. dont create problems when there are non. focus on the real problems at hand.
FOLLOW: You are spot on. These misguided progressives, chiefly "feminists" , have a love affair with Islam and Sharia Law. They seem to lack the basic intelligence to understand that all religions, but especially the Abrahamic ones, are patriarchal and in Islam, the woman's role is submission. Maybe some of these upper middle class feminists should live in Saudi Arabia for a year before boasting of superior women's rights in Islam.
Dawkins' book is literally based off of Sam Harris' idea of religion being the "only game in town" to explain "religious experiences". Harris explained this to Dawkins when Hitchens was still alive and it must've inspired him enough to finally write a book on Sam's cool idea.
This is so sad....I'm of the age now where evolution was taught in schools. I never had any children, but my friends have. I'm absolutely shocked that it's not taught now and is a "dirty" thing. I realize now how out of touch I am. Science was science.....there is something to be said about the The Scientific Method. I asked a 16 year old yesterday about that and he looked at me like I was old and crazy. I remember the Darwin evolution chart from Neanderthal Man to today...nevermind. Those of you who know what I'm talking about can guess how that went down. Shit.
I think these two are going about this in the wrong way. I am trying to turn Evangelicals into Environmentalists as there are reasons for them to take care of creation and to preserve the sanctity of life. I know most people of their ideaology think you should tell it how it is and not compromise, but I think you should talk to people, just calling them idiots will not make them listen to u.
That is laudable but I'm afraid the environment is not the immediate victim of religion. People are dying left and right, EVERY DAY. Saving trees is not going to help them.
MadAboutSaffron Red I'm not saying it is but people like Maher and Hawkins want Americans to get on board with scientific issues but they think the was to do that is to call them idiots and insult the most important aspect of their culture. I think that we should try to reason with them, as many people accept both and science together, it is possible to get people to support the environment if you talk to them the right way.
Except they don't JUST call them idiots.....they have and continue to explain themselves thoroughly. They even did it here?!?! And you say "just calling them idiots"?!? Ridiculous. Put your feels aside and actually listen to them give mounds of evidence and reason.
Got my hopes up thinking they would talk about the google memo, instead I got two of my idols talking about topics that have been discussed on the show for years
Well it is important to keep the topic visible and on peoples minds so they act to keep evolutionary science in the forefront. In addition, by repetition these discussions may reach those not aware of what is going on and the information and help that is available.
"Neuroscientist"? WTF. He is an evolutionary biologist at best. But for the past 30 years he is mainly a chief anti-religious ideologist famous for persistently missing the point.
What? Are you guys even real? How do you even think you're involved in writing a comment on youtube? You have no choice over this - it's all happening automatically, as defined by your genes, evolution, the memes programming your behavior etc.. Better go back to bed. Whatever you think you're doing doesn't matter in the least. Physics and chemistry apply to your brains just like the apple falling from the tree. No room for any "choice" in there. You're as real as a teapot between Jupiter and Mars... not required. First thing Occams razor is going to do is scratch you out of the equation. All of your so-called "achievemens" are just fake. Small wonder Dawkins emphasizes "awe" and other self-gratifying/masturbatory experiences of a passive observer. It's the only thing left in his anti-humanist world view that constrains human beings to total irrelevance. Quite a comfortable position indeed. Guys, the world is going to shit right now! We need to fix it. We can't afford being held up by subscribing to an ideology that has you comfortably recline on an anti-religious "us vs. them" arm chair observing the "awesome universe" - WE ARE REQUIRED TO GET THE FUCK OUT AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT RIGHT NOW AND THAT MEANS US, THEM, YOU AND ME
thanks @Bambi Candj - not sure if I'd frame it in a 1% story though... I don't really have much interest in being elitarian, I think this should affect 100%
I'm continuously impressed by how this show switches effortlessly between comedy and serious debate. Please keep it up.
Yes! One of a kind for sure. I wish some of his guests would run for office,so many make a lot of sense - probably why they're not politicians!
He sounds like he recovered from the stroke well. Glad to see him back to 100%. It was hard to see Richard slurring his words and struggling to speak after he had the stroke. Such a wordsmith should never have to endure that.
Thank you! I was unaware that He had suffered a stroke.
Enduring that will only make him better, this is where legends excel.
You can see it has left a slight mark in the difference between the way the left- and right-halves of his mouth move. It's subtle, but it's there if you look.
But you're right, it's great to see him back.
George Mason even after a stroke he probably could still talk better then Trump.
Andrew Webster what do you mean "could"? He does! This video is evidence of that!
in my state (a christian state in india) churches are taking initiatives creating awareness about climate change for the past few years and we have no problem teaching evolution to students despite our beliefs , i'm surprised that in such a developed country (USA) these are still a major issue , i feel like politicians are encouraging ignorance among christians .
sach kin As I understand its not the whole of US which has this problem its mainly some backwater southern states or among those mormon types.. As for India the issue is different we are more concerned about history and religion. If u go to the northern states like Rajasthan or Gujarat the right wing ideology is very visible in history books. Then again the reason y climate change and evolution is not touched to an extent is cos most of the syllabuses material is from the central govt which changes every now and then all schools including christian and state schools adopt that syllabus
@@SS-yr3ij Correct. Like ALL faults of ANY nation, the faults are RARELY distributed uniformly.
@True Observation You antiCommunists oppress Marxists or ANYONE with ANY belief different from Free Market Anarchy.
are you from north east? same with my state ..
Yeah watching wealthy people suspicious about walking on the shadow of a homeless person in India. You guys are miles ahead
In my country, Donald Trump will have a library named after him and Richard Dawkins will not.
I see this as a serious fucking problem.
I really fucking miss Hitch right now...
You and me both, bud.
They're already collecting the books for the Donald J. Trump Presidential Library. 34 coloring books, 100,000 copies of The Art of the Deal, one copy of The Turner Diaries, 1 bound copy of his tweets and a space reserved for the transcripts of his impeachment hearings. Oh, can't forget about the wall art....50 portraits of Trump by 50 different artists. It'll be the greatest presidential library ever!
If only I could like your username!
You forgot. There's also one copy of the Trump Bible, the size of a room. In it, you can find brilliant passages like Two Corinthians, "The Best Part", and "Somewhere In There."
The Man, The Myth, The Legend..... Richard FUCKIN Dawkins
Unser Herr und Erlöser Adolf Trump's a moron!
Jeffrey Hinkle well Jesus was a historical person, I'm not sure of Mohamed.
Dawkins is a joke in the scientific community
Vote With Bullets yeah I'm sure you have a lot of connections in the scientific community. Lmao.
Hitler you were not a Christian, you hated Christianity plus you hated Atheism but loved Islam but what are you an idiot being an Atheist you hated Atheists and even loved Mystics
We need people like Dawkins now more than ever.
Due to access to information online, there will be more and more Dawkins-like people being created than before.
The conspiracy nuts are louder and more numerous, but behind the scenes I'm sure that there are so many young people like myself that utilise youtube and google as the endless library that geniuses of the past would have killed for to access for one single day.
Since his stroke, Richard is looking more and more healthy, which makes me really happy.
He always has great points. Science and faith can never be compatible.
your so wrong, to be believe in science you must also have faith , imagine believing world started in bigbang, nobody saw it, but still athiest beleve, it takes faith to believe it.Science writer Lincoln Barnett, in his book, The Universe and Dr. Einstein, commented that the continuing discoveries of modern science have made it “more difficult” to ignore the idea of God (1959, 22), science and faith are compatible., religion believe their is gd in creation, and evoluyionist believe matter and energy collide, the bigbang create theuniverse., that is incompatible.
hungry worm
Except, you're wrong.
_"to be believe in science you must also have faith"_
You don't have to "believe in science". Science presents facts-- facts just _are._ They're not something you believe in.
_"imagine believing world started in bigbang, nobody saw it, but still athiest beleve,"_
Bahaha. We have more than enough evidence to make the Big Bang a scientific theory. Again, it's not just believing. _We have reasons to think that this thing did happen._ That's like saying "Nobody saw dinosaurs, but still, people believe they existed!" Well holy fuck, I wonder what the thousands upon thousands of fossil records are? Same goes for things like the redshift of galaxies and expansion of the universe. We don't exactly know _how_ the Big Bang happened, but we know that it was what got the universe as we know it going. Wether or not the universe already was before the Big Bang-- that comes down to hypothesis.
_"it takes faith to believe it."_
It takes faith to believe claims without evidence. The Big Bang, as I said, has evidence.
_"Science writer Lincoln Barnett, in his book, The Universe and Dr. Einstein, commented that the continuing discoveries of modern science have made it “more difficult” to ignore the idea of God."_
And that proves anything..how? There are plenty of religious scientists. So? That doesn't mean they're in the right. Much less a "science writer" from the 50s. That was his opinion- which is not a fact.
_"science and faith are compatible."_
Correct.
_,"religion believe their is gd in creation,"_
Yes, which, if taken literally as it happened in the Bible would be objetively impossible and a ridiculous fable. It already is, anyway.
_"and evoluyionist believe matter and energy collide,"_
You have an inherent misconception of what evolution is, it seems.
The Big Bang is unrelated to evolution. Evolution is the process with which species develop. It doesn't attempt to explain _how_ the species got here in the first place. This doesn't help your case, bud. Evolutionists study the ways in which species evolve. It's not a belief, it's a fact.
_"the bigbang create theuniverse.,"_
Again, unrelated. And for your information, there can be theists who also believe in evolution. The Catholic church publicly accepts it.
_"that is incompatible."_
Well, duh. Of course science and mythology are incompatible. Facts are facts, tales aren't real.
@@shywarrior865 There are some questions we can't answer like - what was there before big bang, what is human consciousness, why are we here, etc. But because we can't answer does question does that mean jesus had super powers or that Mohammed flew down on a winged horse... no. Every single religion is man-made they are fictional stories.
Faith and science are compatible. The engineers at NASA put faith into the Apollo 11 mission uncertain of success.
@@shywarrior865 people don't believe in science like people believe in their religions, people who believe in science used to believe in reason = logic, so science just use logic to prove things then science become more reliable to these people then religion.
I was sued once for $51M saying exactly what I will say again with no reservation.
Love you Dawkins! Keeping pushing the truth!
... lol wut??
Both 2 of my favorite advocates for atheism and reason ever.
So believing we might have come from a god is crazier than believing me might have come from aliens...neither of which is rooted in science but Dawkins has made claims to the alien theory. I'm nit even religious but once u do your "own" research on evolution you will see that life is based on time+chance= life. Science is not based on chance.....but evolition is. How can evolution therefore be science?
Your question is answered in multiple books by Dawkins. Evolution is surprising and interesting because it has identifiable trends and we can predict its outcomes. It's the opposite of random chance.
@@JellyTrackmaster then u dont understand evolution. Do more research amd you will see the beginning of life is based ln chance....the first sequence of fhe first protien molecule is based on randomness and chance. Resesrch it. The theory of evolition has come a long way since Darwins study of fitches. And Dawkins believes we came from an intelligent life form....this form is Aliens. This is Dawkins God...Aliens....because he admits that we were made by something....just not a God....but Aliens. Research it.
@@garrydye2394 Funny how eager you are to tell someone they don't understand something, yet you're completely and utterly fucking confused and can barely form a coherent thought. And no, Dawkins' god isn't "aliens". Dawkins doesn't have a god. That's literally what atheism is.
@@garrydye2394 The point Dawkins makes regarding the "Alien" theory is that it is just as plausible as the God theory. Nothing more, nothing less.
Richard is a biologist, not a neuroscientist. They've got their horsemen mixed up
Explvcit hold your horsemen there! Bill just introduced Sam Harris!
lol, I caught that too.
Correct; he's a Evolutionary Biologist.
True!
Oh yeah. Lol
Ummm... He's an evolutionary biologist, not a neuroscientist
Evolutionary biologist is redundant ; I'm a trained biologist, and evolutionary evidence is the cornerstone of biological inquiry, has been since 1859
Right
linkone11 How come? You can specialize in researching evolutionary biology specifically, you know.
linkone11 An evolutionary biologist is someone who dedicates their study to the evolutionary process, it’s not a redundant label. It’s a field which draws on other fields of biology to a specific end.
Yes, but Professor Dawkins use that title to further his educational agenda, of which I am complete agreement. If you have a scientific background, you know about lumpers and splitters, I will not go there, it's a long term argument in science; since you are watching this I will assume you know the basics of biological inquiry, the self correcting scientific method applies here; Darwin's Origin of Species set out the initial observational evidence that all of biology is grounded in the evolution of species; after 159 years of scrutiny it stands up; later evidence of Mendel, T.H. Morgan and Crick and Watson further supports the fact that evolution is the cornerstone of biology; that being said, I really like the Horny Fruit Flies name, wish I'd thought of that, when my son was 6 years old his first pets were fruit flies, when as an undergraduate I had to reproduce T.H. Morgan's fruit fly experiments
I rather have Dawkins for president then trump
Peetar Ster That ain't even a competition my friend. I'd vote for Richard over most Democrats lol
Anyone with a functioning brain would rather have Dawkins for president than Trump.
id rather have no one as president than Trump. Id vote empty chair in the White House 2020 instead of another four years of the Orange Idiot.
a?
I meant the original comment.
Wait, he's a neuroscientist? Is Bill confusing Dawkins with Sam Harris?
RogerWazup007 right
yeah lol wtf
mistakes happen
RogerWazup007 bill is a sam fanboy
SC 105.1
God never asks us to believe, without giving sufficient evidence upon which to base our faith. His existence, His character, the truthfulness of His word, are all established by testimony that appeals to our reason; and this testimony is abundant. Yet God has never removed the possibility of doubt. Our faith must rest upon evidence, not demonstration. Those who wish to doubt will have opportunity; while those who really desire to know the truth will find plenty of evidence on which to rest their faith. SC 105.2
Great. Just reading the comments is gonna take my whole damn Saturday.
New Message better than getting new messages?
Reading youtube comment sections is more addictive than crack
New Message That's probably the best username and pic I've seen in YT.
T. E. Lawrence fuck you
It's just Trump Trump Trump Trump...
This man is always so enlightening to listen to. Great interview.
Let's not forget that Egypt is also this way. You only have 3 religions to choose from. You're not allowed to be an atheist. So I'll be passing Dawkins info to someone who might need his help.
Eric I know they've been having riots and looting, but I didn't know about how limited their religious freedom was until recently. Then I started doing some research on it, and sadly I realized that my leg wasn't being pulled.
Tabbi Wytch...oppsy Richard Dawkins is not that smart that you thinking see it for your self. In the Islam religion he get fk up. Her is video see it for your self ua-cam.com/video/NJ_A-b0M-U4/v-deo.html.
Dawood Ashrati What a orthograpy...
As long as that illustrates that atheism is NOT a religion, that’s not totally a bad thing!!
In Egypt isn't is predominantly Islam? I'm surprised they let you be Christian there.
USA since Reagan and Murdoch: Ignorance is strength, war is peace, money is speech, corporations are people.
Ronald Reagan was the greatest president in American history -
for the rich.
(Conservatives always forget to add that last part)
corporations are pieced in papers to money for people the few top 1% own the most.
That's what it means "corporations are people" if you never got it...
Stikibits Sounds very similar to the INGSOC motto from 1984.
Solidarity is stupidity.
Neuroscientist? Dawkins is an Evolutionary Biologist.
Some show writer confused Dawkins for Harris
I just love the amount of respect bill has for richard dawkins 💙
Bill understands Richard's intellect and I think Bill just bows down to it. Richard is a truly wonderful guest to have on any show.
Science is the search for knowledge, faith is the abandonment of knowledge.
you can still search for knowledge, while having faith.......
+saking91 Kingsley There is a profound difference between begrudgingly accepting that there are no first principles that are mathematically provable and proselytizing faith as a virtue.
faith in knowledge is critical to the knowledge in science
@saking91 and everyone who does leaves their faith at the door of the lab and picks it up again like a rain coat when they leave.
@Keksi those that see no problem with religion have done far less research into religion than the wood lice whose excretions were hailed as "angels' tears".
Those that have seen Bill's Religious, Richard's The Root of all Evil have seen far more research than evident in your comment.
So awesome to see the his interview for a new book as I'm frantically reading through his other book "The greatest show on earth" 😍
Creationism should never be taught to children outside the context of fairy tales.
Free speech, science makes the perfect sense, Richard Dawkins is a great wordsmith a genius in the modern world how we need him now.
Great to see Richard Dawkins in action again. Thanks for inviting him, Bill. Great Move.
Richard Dawkins is a beacon of light.
Ung Grabb To some
"... that was taken as an insult, but actually of course it is a simple statement of fact. " Hahahaha! So brilliantly put. I love Dawkins! Awesome!
SOMETIMES THE TRUTH HURTS!!! YES!!!
So well said. He absolutely nailed it.
Wisdom it is when Mr. Dawkins speak.
hey guys, that bird tie is pretty dope.
"But when you meet ridiculous objections, they come from ridiculous people."
I'm so excited for his new book! So glad to see he looks well after his stoke last year.
gamer zone and you and me and everyone on earth. Humans live to about 70-80 years and if lucky maybe 90. So whats your point?
Welcome back Richard Dawkins! We missed you.
Two of my heroes
Richard is a hero amoungst many read every book he has ever written heard every quote every speach my hero
He seemed to have introduced him as a neurologist :O
I love this man Dawkins
Boi this Stupid Wrld, needs Soooo Many more Gr8 Ppl like Richard. Period !
My Two Favorite People in the World
It is great to see how well Richard Dawkins has recovered.
Make America Smart Again
• Love It!!! Brilliant saying
Smart, when was that?
nice tie 🐦
Yeah Mr. Dawkins!!!! Yeah science!!!!!
It’s so refreshing to listen to smart people talk.
Dawkins/Hitchens are the McCartney/Lennon of free thinking.
gmmg - I suppose that Makes Harris, Harrison. Dennett is Ringo. Lol
Rex Ablett good one Harris is TOTALLY Harrison many many similarities
I am a Muslim and I approve this Message. Dawkins is Dope AF !!
I could listen him all day and never get bored.
Science is a path to knowledge with evidence. Faith is pretending to know without evidence.
There are different kinds of evidence, some evidence has to do with science and some with faith.
Phil Hmp what is your evidence? did you do your data yourself?
religious people should be castrated and locked up in psychiatric institutions
@@pattersonpi3027 Indeed they need to follow the King of kings and the Lord of lords which is Jesus Christ🙏
Patterson you’re the type of person people fear you do realize that
*HATRED OF IDEAS, OPINIONS, AND BELIEFS IS NOT THE SAME AS HATRED OF PEOPLE WHO HOLD THEM*
Removing labels is a good beginning. One needs to behave properly with others, while addressing critical matters logically, and emotional matters with compassion.
Teach only Evolution in schools an no creationism at all!
Someday soon Dawkins will answer the 'Dawkins Stumped' question and tell us about the most recent gene to be fixed in the human genome.
Yeah in schools in the UK we are taught evolution (as a fact) in Biology class and the 'creation story' in Religious Studies class.
I disagree evolution theory (with creationism) can be teach in philosophy class and evolution might be mentioned in a science class as a possible explanation. But it is still a theory not a fact as many believe and need much more evidence to be teach as so.
El Smith: You UK school system should be ashamed, there is not evidence to support evolution as fact and it is still a possible theory but not proven without a shadow of doubt.
@Kim Danielsen Religion is obviously discussed during these Biology lessons and the teachers have never stated "religion is wrong" during them.
Ca we all just say how amazing Richard Dawkins's tie is?
Most exciting guest lineup this show has had in a while
We love you dawkins😍😍😍
So glad to see him doing well. I remember reading he suffered a stroke probably last year.
“I’ve never seen a case where logic swayed them”
Why have the likes of Dawkins and Stephen Hawking not been given knighthoods?
WHY DID I READ THAT AS 'KNIGHTBOOBS'?
Stephen Hawking turned down an offer for a knighthood.
I wasn't aware of this. Thank-you for this information. My respect for Mr. Hawking is now even greater.
loafer sheffield The Queen is technically the head of the Church of England.....and Dawkins is the God (person the pun) of atheists. He does deserve a knighthood. They gave one to bloody Mick Jagger.
Agreed. My point exactly.
That ending when dawkins don't want to stand up
I’m Muslim but I’m a fan of Richard Dawkins.
I think people too often confuse the idea of freedom of speech/expression with the idea that everyone's opinion has value.
So great to see him doing so much better, woohoo!
Richard Dawkins (science be upon him) is the prophet of reason and logic.
terminator _vs_ : nicely done on the pbuh analogy.
Richard Dawkins is a neuroscientist?
atom probably confused him with sam Harris lol
I think Bill accidentally confused him for Sam Harris.
atom mixed up between Harris...sam Harris is neuro scientist
well he is a scientist, and he knows more about the workings of animals and their neural capacities than most humans on the planet.
if he doesn't already have the technical degree of neuro, i am confident that any neuroscientist alive would consider it a privilege for him to teach their class or accompany them in their research. his work in ethology is more than sufficient for him to have earned the degree.
Maher thought he was chatting with that other piece of garbage Sam Harris
We love you too Bill 🇬🇧✌🏼
Richard Dawins sir. I love all your books and what you stand for.
I love this show
Yay Dawkins!
That man has soul
Science doesn't care what you think.
Religion is the exact opposite.
Most scientists care what we think, in many cases they need huge support to finance science.
Care about your cash, why would God need money???
To be fair, you can criticize what someone says, without hoping for their speech to be shut down. There's a difference.
Man I love this guy
Can Bill Maher run for president in 2020?
A person who has an OPINION!! Yeah elect another celebrity. America grow up already.
Evolution, like all scientific phenomenons, doesn't rely on beliefs, but in observation and evidence, instead. Therefore, regarding evolution for instance, the term "believing" is incorrect. The right term to be utilized should be "agreement" or "acceptance" of it's existence as a biological fact.
Carl Sagan's novel CONTACT addressed these issues as well.
Neil disGrace Tyson stained his image, forever.
NO, he didn't.
Great to see he has recovered from his illness and is back in action!
as always, this chap makes undeniable statements, & does it with great clarity, logic, proper reasoning & some humility as well
I think it is fair to point out that while Islam does opress Islam, here in America they can be an opressed minority by Christians and the government. Whether by violence or travel bans. Now, what Dawkins, Bill, and Sam Harris do is not opressive. I agree with their criticisms 100 percent. But Muslims have more to worry about than just other Muslims, and I think it's important to acknowledge that.
The midde-east minority is in no way getting oppressed in America. Oppression takes place in the countries from which they run away in the first place. They have all the rights and freedoms here, none of which would be given to you if you went to their countries.That's oppression for you.
"Hijab and Burqa are considered liberating" Where are you seeing this among liberals? I never do, even though I hear people complaining about it a lot.
Follow the Damn Train CJ Last time I check wearing any clothing or coverings be it for religious reasons or secular are a human rights. You could choose to not to exercise it too. That is liberating. Just because they don't follow a fashion fad doesn't mean they are not liberating. Lol.
look here is the problem with your argument. you dont have evidence to support it. you believe they get oppressed but thats the end of it. where are the lists full of facts of violence against minorities from white christian people? where are the recorded facts of subjugation? you can even be president in the united states as a minority. the most powerful man in the world. where is this oppression you speak of?
ive never seen it and i live in germany with around 40% foreigners in my city. ive never ever seen it. ive never seen facts about it. ive never seen evidence. and i would never turn a blind eye to it. but i am a man of facts and not wishful thinking.
dont create problems when there are non. focus on the real problems at hand.
FOLLOW: You are spot on. These misguided progressives, chiefly "feminists" , have a love affair with Islam and Sharia Law. They seem to lack the basic intelligence to understand that all religions, but especially the Abrahamic ones, are patriarchal and in Islam, the woman's role is submission.
Maybe some of these upper middle class feminists should live in Saudi Arabia for a year before boasting of superior women's rights in Islam.
Science for all the holes !
Dawkins' book is literally based off of Sam Harris' idea of religion being the "only game in town" to explain "religious experiences". Harris explained this to Dawkins when Hitchens was still alive and it must've inspired him enough to finally write a book on Sam's cool idea.
6:32 a conversation between Mr. Dawkins and Jordan Peterson is something we need to hear
"Poor little diddums" has just been added to my vocabulary. Thanks once again, Mr. Dawkins.
I never clicked a link faster.
I love Richard dawkins
This is so sad....I'm of the age now where evolution was taught in schools. I never had any children, but my friends have. I'm absolutely shocked that it's not taught now and is a "dirty" thing. I realize now how out of touch I am. Science was science.....there is something to be said about the The Scientific Method. I asked a 16 year old yesterday about that and he looked at me like I was old and crazy. I remember the Darwin evolution chart from Neanderthal Man to today...nevermind. Those of you who know what I'm talking about can guess how that went down. Shit.
"And they're the people on our side" is the stake that hits home. Sad state of affairs =/
AWESOME, really. Thanks Bill and Richard!
B R I L.L.I A N T .....SHOW. TONIGHT
.every. Minute of it
I love Richard Dawkins but He always looks like a robot trying to learn how to feel emotions.
I think these two are going about this in the wrong way. I am trying to turn Evangelicals into Environmentalists as there are reasons for them to take care of creation and to preserve the sanctity of life. I know most people of their ideaology think you should tell it how it is and not compromise, but I think you should talk to people, just calling them idiots will not make them listen to u.
Julian Bluefeather Wow, this is very true. I admire your approach contrast to many atheist's hatred for all things religion.
That is laudable but I'm afraid the environment is not the immediate victim of religion. People are dying left and right, EVERY DAY. Saving trees is not going to help them.
MadAboutSaffron Red I'm not saying it is but people like Maher and Hawkins want Americans to get on board with scientific issues but they think the was to do that is to call them idiots and insult the most important aspect of their culture. I think that we should try to reason with them, as many people accept both and science together, it is possible to get people to support the environment if you talk to them the right way.
Except they don't JUST call them idiots.....they have and continue to explain themselves thoroughly.
They even did it here?!?! And you say "just calling them idiots"?!? Ridiculous. Put your feels aside and actually listen to them give mounds of evidence and reason.
I'm so glad to see him back and well!
I know its almost a year later, but i'm sad i didn't now of Mr. Dawkins before right now. He sounds like a very intelligent and free thinking man.
Got my hopes up thinking they would talk about the google memo, instead I got two of my idols talking about topics that have been discussed on the show for years
Here is an article you might be interested in: www.npr.org/sections/money/2014/10/21/357629765/when-women-stopped-coding
oontgrad thanks, I did find it interesting
SOME French intellectuals, please
Well it is important to keep the topic visible and on peoples minds so they act to keep evolutionary science in the forefront. In addition, by repetition these discussions may reach those not aware of what is going on and the information and help that is available.
What memo?
Could someone please muster up a new birth certificate for Mr. Dawkins so that he can run for US President.
Dawkins isn't a Neuroscientist Bill....
Wow, great commentary
Well said.
When you actually think about it God disappears in a puff of logic.
(That is whichever God, or Godess, you believe in).
It pains me to see prof. Dawkins is aging so quickly. Can't we just transplant youth?
MaxTheDragon aging quickly? The Man is 78.
"Neuroscientist"? WTF. He is an evolutionary biologist at best. But for the past 30 years he is mainly a chief anti-religious ideologist famous for persistently missing the point.
And what point would that be?
omgsolikevalleygirl Yes, please enlighten us.
What? Are you guys even real? How do you even think you're involved in writing a comment on youtube? You have no choice over this - it's all happening automatically, as defined by your genes, evolution, the memes programming your behavior etc.. Better go back to bed. Whatever you think you're doing doesn't matter in the least.
Physics and chemistry apply to your brains just like the apple falling from the tree. No room for any "choice" in there. You're as real as a teapot between Jupiter and Mars... not required. First thing Occams razor is going to do is scratch you out of the equation.
All of your so-called "achievemens" are just fake.
Small wonder Dawkins emphasizes "awe" and other self-gratifying/masturbatory experiences of a passive observer. It's the only thing left in his anti-humanist world view that constrains human beings to total irrelevance. Quite a comfortable position indeed.
Guys, the world is going to shit right now! We need to fix it. We can't afford being held up by subscribing to an ideology that has you comfortably recline on an anti-religious "us vs. them" arm chair observing the "awesome universe" - WE ARE REQUIRED TO GET THE FUCK OUT AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT RIGHT NOW
AND THAT MEANS US, THEM, YOU AND ME
thanks @Bambi Candj - not sure if I'd frame it in a 1% story though... I don't really have much interest in being elitarian, I think this should affect 100%
Dawkins has an "anti-humanist world view"? Talking about missing the point...
Dawkins is love, Dawkins is life.
GeneralErica no. Skrek is love...skrek is life
Richard Dawkins is one of my heroes.