SpaceX COMPLETE Starship Booster 11, and rollout Booster 13! + A Falcon 9 Booster DOESN'T Land!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 кві 2024
- It's been another jam-packed week! Lots of Starship and Starbase news, including the completion of Booster 11 and rollout and cryotesting of 13. A Falcon 9 doesn't land for the first time in nearly 150 flights, Rocket Lab carry two satellites to orbit, China launched its 7th crewed outing to its Tiangong Space Station, and so much more. Enjoy!
👕Buy my Merch!!.............►bit.ly/3fM2BKs
😎Join the Channel!..........►bit.ly/3sPu0ld
🐱🏍My Subreddit.................► / mattssubreddit
📷Instagram......................► / mattlowne
🔥Twitter............................► / matt_lowne
💬Discord...........................► / discord
💕Patreon...........................►goo.gl/lLDt79
🚀Second channel.............►goo.gl/cww3Ik
Check out NASASpaceFlight's Starbase 24/7 livestream!
• Starbase Live: 24/7 St...
Starship, Starbase, and all other rocket Photographers:
📷 NASASpaceFlight ► / @nasaspaceflight
📸 Starship Gazer ► / starshipgazer
📸 LabPadre ► / labpadre
📸 Starbase Surfer ► / cnunezimages & www.cnunezimages.com/
📸 Mary ► / bocachicagal
📸 Jack Beyer ► / thejackbeyer
📸 Sean Doherty ► / @nasaspaceflight - Наука та технологія
Its crazy that a Falcon 9 first stage NOT landing has become out of the ordinary...
Indeed it has! Yes, they have a lot more but still, it’s actually a little shocking since we’re so used to them sticking the landing.
I mean, I get it. But even then, I guess there are limits.
Yeah right, it's bigger news than 2 falcon heavy side boosters landing in sync. Insane how reliable it has become over the years.
The impossible rocket ;•) and now it seems strange when it for once does not do the impossible.
I find it sad that so many boosters are being lost or scrapped around the 20 landing mark. 1058 unfortunately fell into the sea on its 19th flight and this booster was expended on its 20th flight. Right now there is only one booster which has 20 flights and is ready to launch again. The good news is that SpaceX is now targeting 40 launches
20 flights the great filter for falcon 9 boosters
R.I.P Falcom 9 Booster
ITS NAME IS 1060 😫
@@MattLownewhy that emoji? 😳
Nice little Tim Dodd cameo @10:43 😀
I love it when the introduction to the Starlink section is the same length as the section itself.
RIP B1060. With B1058 in Valhalla.
7:15 ESA:
Quickly… what is this word?
European space agency
@@mikejo8194-- It's a joke; Matt says "quickly improving", ESA doesn't know the meaning of the word.
O7 for B1060
we got the new V1 Ultrakill robot
Electron was such a cool launch.
There's not way SpaceX will ever land a super heavy booster.
From the same people who said they'd never land a Falcon 9 booster.
Those people just hate Elon and everything his name is attached to. Superheavy will be a successful vehicle and the next one they start developing the same people will say it will never work. They will keep saying SpaceX projects will never work even if they keep succeeding.
Best part of a Monday
Love these videos, Matt!
Hope spacex works with Boston Dynamics to have the first humanoids on mars be robots
Why should they? Tesla has its own humanoid robots.
Space this week: Helping us survive Mondays, one week at a time
hi matt lowne its crazy on how spacex is speedrunning the starship production, thank you for your commitment in making these videos and giving us good news bye have a good day or night
Always appreciate these weekly videos Matt, so much cool stuff going on and it's hard to keep up with at times!❤
You crack me up dude.
Have a great watch!
woot Matt
ty
Is 2 at a Jool 5 point for you?
Thanks for all the amazing content!
Matt lowne u are da goat
SpaceX has a fixed goal, which I appreciate.
Good video
*the interlude footage* wait a minute, i know that place to well ...
Cool
Thanks! Always super appreciate space this week - hope this helps cover the costs!
That was Adrian from NSF 🧐
What a pleasant surprise!
He said there would not be a space this week today.
I must say the Technik Museum in Speyer ist verry interresting, but personallay I would say Sinsheim is a bit more, because of its tu-144 and Concorde. 10:53
Hey Matt, where was that Lufthansa 747 you were at?
I been hearing that starship 30 is in the bay. And bay door is open. I guess it's ready for SF just like they did SN 29 early.
...thanks for all the fish.
Loved the HHGTTG reference. Funny story, I teach CS, and I often ask my students to give me numbers for demonstrating data structures. Invariably, one of them would say 42, and I would say something like "that's the answer" assuming that they were making a reference. Last year, I found out they're not. They had no idea why I liked them using the number 42 so much.
Maybe you should think about how to make them (want to) read these books, rather than or before watching the dull film.
Can you make any Star Wars ship or speeder.
Wooohooooo
can't wait to see this one go boom
o7 Booster 1060-20
We need solar sail technology ! Its alot faster than what we presently have !
can anyone explain how the saturn rockets made it to the moon, when starship needs like 8 refuellings ?? honest question, really looking for an answer
Because the Saturn 5 had lots of stages when starship only has 2, by the time the command module is staged, it would be already on a path to the moon, while the starship second and final stage uses most of its fuel to circularize its orbit.
@@amateuryoutubergood answer… thanks for this 👍👍👍
@amateuryoutuber i thought starship is the biggest rocket .. did the Saturn 5 hold several times the "fuel" that starship does ? I guess that the the Saturn was less "fuel" efficient than the starship raptors .. so how much fuel did they need in 69 compared to today, for a trip to the moon and back..
@@AZ-kp2gq correct me if I’m wrong… the starship essentially lifts approximately 100 metric tons to orbit. So essentially, this could be 100 metric tons of fuel. Either as an upper stage or fuel for something else
@@JenniferA886 correct, even more in the future .. so how did all the stages of the Saturn 5 hold more fuel ? I just don't understand the math behind this
VERY unrelated but you should let your cat design a KSP plane/rocket, credit to messier82 for the idea
chees
also why does starship version 3 add more vacuum engines? Thrust doesn't really matter because you don't have to fight gravity and u are adding more mass, so I am kinda wondering why
Efficency in space is crucial if you want to get to mars, also it is stronger
You still have to get into orbit
They always wanted to get 6 rVacs on the ship so why not add more now since it weighs more. Having the extra 3 should mean it would be more efficient to burn for a much heavier ship than just 3
But the isp doesnt increase when you add more engines. Is it really just about getting into orbit after the hot staging? Isn't that part mostly sideways? The hardest part where you really gain height is already done by the boosters. I image that that would be where higher thrust would be most important, since the acceleration is slowed down by gravity.
@@mysteriousguy2230 to get into an orbital trajectory from a suborbital trajectory, you have to increase to orbital speeds fast enough. If you don't accelerate fast enough you will fall back into the atmosphere before you can reach orbital velocity. My guess is starship 3 has too much mass for just 3 enignes to push it to orbital velocity in time, so it needs 6. Im not an expert though, correct me if im wrong.
Rip 1060
Even if Ariane 6 is ready- how is the launch cost compared to Falcon? Why ever use a more expensive option....
Performance and availability
@@Trailmaker. And propping up government programs
Wait, didn't u cancel this video in the last episode?
Haven't finished this one in case u clarify later.
Edit: 10:27 Answered
Question: If you sail, you know you cannot direct the vessel without a keel. How does a solar sail navigate?
My understanding was that the keel has more to do with balance than navigation, prevent the wind in the sails from making the craft capsize, though I expect it still helps navigation thanks to hydrodynamics.
The solar sails I've seen usually look like they'd steer more like a vertical (or horizontal?) para-glider than a sailboat. Would that mean the main craft's own mass is the keel?
2:23 looks similar to the SN-11 explosion shot, which was, I believe, almost 3 years ago
Great Vid. Thanks for being a real person, rather than an annoying AI voiceover. (And for being a fellow Britisher!)
why do i feel like im cheating when i watch another youtubers space news video lol
Change it to Starship this week
When new ksp2 begginers guide video
Mazzy’s not Macy’s.
Its probably just the accent
Lowne Aerospace ❤️ 12
How is it Artemis has go so little done??????
Apollo had a fatal flaw: a clear end goal, a point where money could stop being spent. Constellation through to Artemis solves this problem.
a
I have done it
Hi Matt, about the rapid reusability, do you think the tiles will ever give them that? I think not. If they want rapid turnaround, the tiles HAVE to go for most of the ship and clad with something else, for example a single use thermal ablative blanket that is wrapped around the main body. There'd be a payload penalty but turnaround times would be slashed.
Given the relatively simple shape Starship has it shouldn't be too complex, but a wipe-off/spray-on abalator would be better. I think a couple of X-15 flights started testing that.
@@12pentaborane Interesting. I'd think such an ablator would be a nightmare to get off as it's charred and cooked on the outside, very brittle and tough at the same time. Am I completely wrong?
@@paulmichaelfreedman8334 Honestly I'm not sure about what the process would look like but I could see a rubber compound that sprays on then expands and chars in the heat. Getting it off might require harsh chemicals, but that will be quicker than inspecting thousands of tiles. However I'm sure SpaceX already thought of it and that's why they're using tiles, because I'm probably wrong.
🫡
Rip ksp 2, take two just shut down intercept games.
make a vid and give them support!
They could've used Falcon Heavy to bring the Galileo satellites into orbit, then they wouldn't have to expend B1060, and carry on with more flights with it.
Oh well, I guess it's a 🫡 to B1060.
First
First literally
Meee--thane? And aliumminuumuum?? Can I get a translator please?
Just Google English to Simplified English and it should give you a good idea.
@@Sundablakr be quite, I'm just playing. I like the different pronunciations.
@@Sundablakr ohhh 🔥🔥
Every time I see this "... making life multiplanetary..." I imagine aliens who laugh their heads off about the stupidness of mankind. 👽😂🤣
MATT KSP2 IS BEING CANCELLED
Wouldn't the Starship need legs to land on the moon/mars? So why bother with catching it?
Never mind 'll go ask the the nouveau Nephilim father of lies maybe he knows :)
turn around time for refueling ships and weight savings.
The Starships that go to the Moon and Mars will be different specially built vehicles. They wont be the same ones being rapidly reused on Earth.
🎉 first viewer
first
1 view man you fell off.
"Making life interplanetary"
Elon is so full of shit.
What's wrong with trying to achieve your dream? Even if it doesn't happen in his lifetime, which it almost certainly wont, at least he's trying. The space travel industry has been a stagnant mess for 50 years until SpaceX came along and started innovating. There's a reason so many space startups have popped up since Falcon 9 trying to imitate it's success.
@@Sundablakrthis.
Whats the difference if you launch from Russia or Elon Musks SpaceX? Putin controls them both.
Why is the last video only for 'paying customers'??? Like I'm not pissed enough about the state of the game, now I cxan't hear the news from you because you want me to pay for it??? Some of us can't afford it ffs, but ok... You don't care IG... Cheers, you lost a subscriber today...
4:13 “elon time”👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿
I would say take Elon's ambitious timelines and mulitply it by 3. Except for numbers produced. He seems to be fairly on point with those numbers generally.