SpaceX Strips Heatshield Tiling from Ship 29, and Unveil New Lunar Starship!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 кві 2024
- Lots to cover today, from scrappage at Starbase, twin Falcon launches at the Cape, and both China and the United States prepare to send astronauts to the two Earth Orbit Space Stations, one of which will be the maiden crewed flight of Starliner! We also saw the reveal of two new Lunar Landers for Artemis - one from SpaceX, one from Blue Origin!
👕Buy my Merch!!.............►bit.ly/3fM2BKs
😎Join the Channel!..........►bit.ly/3sPu0ld
🐱🏍My Subreddit.................► / mattssubreddit
📷Instagram......................► / mattlowne
🔥Twitter............................► / matt_lowne
💬Discord...........................► / discord
💕Patreon...........................►goo.gl/lLDt79
🚀Second channel.............►goo.gl/cww3Ik
Full Space News Playlist:
• Space This Week
Check out NASASpaceFlight's Starbase 24/7 livestream!
• Starbase Live: 24/7 St...
Starship, Starbase, and all other rocket Photographers:
📷 NASASpaceFlight ► / @nasaspaceflight
📸 Starbase Surfer ► / cnunezimages & www.cnunezimages.com/
📸 Mary ► / bocachicagal
📸 Sean Doherty ► / @nasaspaceflight
3D Animation of Superheavy Splashdown:
🚀Corey ► / c_bass3d & / @cbassproductions - Наука та технологія
Heck yeah! Model trains
the model trains was a perfect break from the space chat and who dosent like model trains?
Model trains are the best
This looks like the place in Prauge where there are a lot of model trains
I love trains too, but at 7:41 you missed something even cooler. _Everyday Astronaut_ loves model trains, too!!!!
As a veteran KSP player that thing will roll further than it'll fly...
Just fast forward
A video of Tim Dodd playing with trains? Yes, most entertaining.
The old vertical tanks would make a colossal BBQ pit
It would be a full-blown crematorium.
I miss your giggles from old Videos, but it is what it is, probably better for the numbers ;o)
Excited for the Starliner Launch soon, I missed the first flights of SLS and Starship, I don't wanna miss another Space Milestone!
It’s not going to the moon. It hasn’t even successfully orbited earth and returned without exploding.
@@erinrizzo3004 This isn't true and I even mention in the video how people don't seem to realise that Starliner has already been to space and returned to Earth, twice in fact.
@@MattLowne it disintegrated on its return to Earth.
@@erinrizzo3004 ??? No, it didn't, both flights to space landed successfully.
@@MattLowne in all three lunches of starship, all of them have exploded.
nice timing i was about to watch another video and caught ya thanks for another video!
I do hope they remember to attach the booster underneath the Starliner before they attempt to launch it. That could be embarrassing.
It’s crazy how we’ve reached a point that three launches in a week is considered not that many
Three launches a week by only one provider. All the others are still in NASA time.
Good news! With the Boeing Starliner the door doesn't fall off. It does get blown off but it won't fall off.
Fr this is a tiresome narrative. Having more launch options is never a bad thing and Starliner has safely reached space and landed again twice now without crew.
More launch options is good but "safely" is a stretch.
@@MattLowne Just making fun of the planes Matt, take it easy.
@@MattLowneI completely agree about having redundant crew launch systems. It's insanely cool that the US has Falcon 9/Dragon, and soon Atlas V/Starliner and SLS/Orion. More of us should appreciate this.
However, that doesn't mean we can't call out mismanaged companies with a recent issue of safety and quality control. Boeing literally murdered a whistleblower from their aircraft division, let alone the complacency of the entire 737 Max saga.
It's obvious that Starliner's path to crewed launch has been troubled. From the parachute issue on the pad abort test, to the software glitch that prevented OFT-1 from reaching ISS, to there being safety issues on the service module potentially colliding with the capsule after separating, the valve issues, the flammable tape, etc.
I want to see Starliner succeed, but until they're safely launching crew, I don't think we should stop scrutinising them.
Space this week: Helping us survive mondays, one episode at a time
NO ADS BEFORE THE VIDEO STARTED LETS GOOOOOOOOO!
I got one😢
Lucky bastard
please refresh the video so you can watch an ad my family is starving
@@MattLowne I'm eating a 100$ meal rn…
@@MattLowne let them starve it build character.
Butch and Sunny obviously drew the short straws.
I remember that first flight. I remember the concrete and dirt storm and the huge pit.
I also remember the folks who said repair would take a so,id year and the the second flight would take even longer.
They were wrong and flight 4 is nearly ready as well as a second pad and tower at Boca Chica.
Starship will never get to the Moon, won't even make the orbital refueling to work.
How many Raptor engines (minimum) would it take to get first set of astronauts on the moon. Trick question, give it some serious thought.
falcon 9 worked and so did apollo and james webb! amazing things are possible
@@jofreddy8643Yes when the concept is good.
@@jdmather5755 I don't know. What I know is Starship will prove to be useless very soon. Just wait.
@@jofreddy8643 Assume everything works with recovery and reuse (where possible). How many Raptor Engines? Back of envelope calculation, say within +- 100. What is your number?
4:50 Emmm... LM2F looks nothing like the soyuz rocket, sir🧐
Hey! Tim Dodd made an appearance! 7:40
The first music you use is pretty cool
Thx Matt lowne for doing me a small favor and inspiring me to go into aerospace
Lowne Aerospace is the Best Aerospace.
Having 2 rovers was a benefit for Matt Damon. So maybe 3 is even better?
If they design the rovers to interconnect joining for initial ‘base’ plans, it might not be a bad idea.
New to the channel, you walked me through most of ksp2. Loving the spacex videos too ! Keep it up, great work !!!
W spacex, excited to see it land.
FINALLY A MOONSHIP
This shit is not going to the moon man
nope
Great job
G SCALE TRAINS!!! love them, thanks.
Nice
Ah, another weekly dose of Space This Week! PS: What music do you use?
Matt's outros getting cut off by the video ending never gets old 😆thanks again for another space news update! I always look to catch this series and Marcus House's space news series to keep myself caught up on all the spaceflight happenings
Hell yeah
Yay
_Everyday Astronaut_ cameo at 7:41 ogling model trains.
3:26 "We saw two launch one day apart from the same space center..."
No, Kennedy Space Center and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station are two distinct entities. KSC is run by NASA and CCSFS is run by the Space Force. They are right next to each other, but definitely not "the same space center". That would be like saying England and Scotland are "the same thing" because they're right next to each other.
Why dont they just thundercunt the tank shell when its disconnected surely its easier
comparing long march,, to soyuz?
id get it if you meant shenzhou maybe
I love how he said “X!” Over himself when he said “Twitter” on 0:46
Sorry!, its 0:45
feet up, port in hand, matt lowne on youtube... what's not to like?.. in fact, have a like.. while I settle down and enjoy.
1:30 I thought they remove the loose ones and replace them with more sturdy ones?
Boeing Starliner...let's hope it's door doesn't blow off in flight!
If that crane can handle a D11 sized electric Cat bulldozer in Earth gravity, I think they should build it because handling that mass on the moon and Mars would be guaranteed. Placing the feet further from the centerline would make it more tip resistant.
Im pretty sure no flight will see landing legs on the not a falcon 9. I saw recently they plan to use a guide wire system that'll close around the top of the booster and just hang it in the air. It actually seems like a better solution than legs.
imagine they launch IFT-4 when he's away :')
Is the vertical integration building mooving at 6:16?
Seriously brave astronauts daring to go fly with a Boeing capsule. For multiple reasons even.
PS, YES i know, more options, more better. But the Boeing company did have some serious setbacks as of late with flying things. And the first two flights were anything but flawless, including a lot of software bugs.
hi matt
Just wait until starship has a dozen launchpads to launch from.
Am i the only one who heard Twitter when he said X?
Can you recreate the starship in ksp2
can you talk about the Gilmour space agency? they are planning a test flight of Eris orbital vehicle soon
"The Long March 2F is a clone of soyuz" is crazy.
You can say that about Shenzhou because it's literally a liscenced copy of the Soyuz spacecraft, but the rocket?
Yes, the rocket is based on Soyuz architecture.
@@MattLowne soyuz uses a different fuel, different engines, they are 20 meters different in hight, different diameters. Boosters on Chinese rocket have 1 nozzle each, and boosters on soyuz have 4 nozzles each. You simply have no place in this sector with this level of incompetence, go back to playing KSP and leave this sector to people who have a clue.
@@MattLowne
if by architecture you mean having a core stage and 4 boosters then you'd be right
but that would be like saying a falcon heavy is based on delta IV heavy architecture
I like trains.
I don't know. Maybe making a lander with an extremely high centre of gravity for the sake of a whole bunch of excess tankage and then winching out a heavy payload away off axis is not a good idea.
tintin could do it!
what music do you use for these videos?
Shenzhou is a clone of soyuz, but afaik rocket itself is not soyuz, just happened t9 have similar configuration.
It's been a week already?!
At 3:11 the car drives at the left side of the road.... again!
You don't count Jeb as a crew member?
For the heatshields to work they'd first need to orient the ship properly and not let it spin uncontrollably.
Can't wait for the next starship fireworks.
They are still planning the chopstick cetch. I think elon forgot that spasce is hard. Because if or more likeley when you miss it is pretty much a case of start again from ground 0
Why haven’t the launched a boaster no starship to test splash down and landing ?
Elon got one thing perfectly right...the ‘Big Bang.’
It would be great if they invent new material replacing heat tiles by spraying starship with high thermal insulator paint...!!!!
Did anybody check the bolts on Starliner?
0:34 “On the 20th of April we had a momentous anniversary, that’s right can you believe it’s been 135 years since german mustache man was born!"
That must have been a religious holiday for the american slimebag guy.
Starliner. What is going sideways this time...
Hi Matt! Do you think the heat tiles will continue to pose a big problem for reusability? Do you think SpaceX will be forced to an alternative if they want actual RAPID reusability?
I am afraid it will be, looking at the Shuttle and also SS ALWAYS losing tiles on a mission. I am thinking an ablative blanket which can be wrapped around starship would definitely comply with rapid reusability, as it can be discarded after use and replaced while SS is stacked. I'd have to write another 10 paragraphs to fully describe my idea, so I'll leave it at that. What do you think?
The starship version of the lander will likely require some sort of counter weight system when lowering cargo from that height, laws of physic still apply to Musk even though he thinks he can get a Tesla to go 0-60 in under 1s.
Still no sign of this anywhere at SpaceX, been the same image repurposed for years, only thing they are doing is developing a starlink deployment system for their own commercial goals.
It has passed an entire year since the first launch, fr?
The animation of the booster landing into the chopsticks is interesting in that it shows the rocket's exhaust flame rotating back and forth over the orbital launch platform/tower. If the real booster has to gimble the landing engines that much, are they going to have to harden much more of stage zero?
don't worry mate none of this is ever going to happen
Isn’t it „if I MAY say so“?
Loweniosen
nope, you were right the first time. It's twitter.
Tron
when are you making a ksp1 video? I really want to see you go interstelar.
Hopefully the 11th of May 🤞
@@MattLowne YAY!
Blue Origin's lander looks way too top-heavy, with the cantilevered payload sticking out to the side. Not sure it would remain standing. The same payload on Starship is a much smaller fraction (both size and mass) so it should have a much smaller effect on Starship's stability.
Always funny that we can’t change our mindsets to call “Twitter”, “X”
yay 59 sec ago
Let me make something very clear, it ain't going to Mars.
Thing can barely make it to orbit. The moon? Mars? Forget it.
@@Ismael-tv3dx it will be a Leo and geo launcher
@@darksars3622 not what Elon advertised.
Well thats the thing if they can figure out if orbital refueling is even possible (some scientists sincerely doubt it due to how unpredictable fluids act in zero g) then basically anywhere in the solar system is possible but honestly i doubt space x is gonna be the company to crack it.
i can't wait till NASA actually kick spacex to the curb and have someone actually do HLS, since starship is like a decade away from human flight if ever
Dude, its a PROTOTYPE. And it STILL makes more progress then SLS. Keep coping
19 billion dollars and 7 years for one crewed flight around the moon that will be delayed again. Nasa is DEAD. Starship is space explorations lifeline.
You're going to be waiting a long time, that's never happening
@@Hungary_0987SLS has actually successfully set a payload to the moon and back, on its first launch with zero issues meanwhile starship has blown up how many times trying to get to orbit? Face facts the only thing good about starship are those raptor engines and they would be better on literally any other vehicle
@@exilestudios9546 SLS and Starship have had radically different development paths, not comparable. SLS started development in 2011, while Starship realistically didn't start serious R&D until 2018. Starship is also being developed with an iterative and incremental approach, where launch failures are expected in order to obtain data. Also, Starship is far more ambitious, aiming to be fully reusable, something never achieved before. Hate Elon Musk all you want (which I suspect is the source of your hate for Starship) but what SpaceX are doing is seriously impressive.
The more I think about it do the Chinese have no shame in copying, or is it actually that they have no ego?
hi mattlowne the new starship hls is bad wait its basically the same
it's not a HLS lander, it's cargo only (though this comment came so quickly there's no way you got to that part of the video yet)
The starship has always been stupid and a failure lmao.
@@MattLowne yes sorry im an idiot lol and its basically the same too 😅😅
🌜🚀👍
I generally hope NASA stops relying on the starship because it’s just going to bring down the entire Artemis project.
video games
Matt anybody with any knowledge of rockets would know the long march 2f is nothing like a soyuz. Along with that tianlong rocket is not “just” a falcon 9 clone. Maybe educate yourself a bit about chinese rockets.
I have this inner feeling that Starship will not get human rated and just be a cargo craft...........NASA are worried about the capability of Space X to get a human rated Starship to land on the moon.
Yeah this thing probably wont even get cargo rated. It cant even make it to orbit let alone the fucking moon
cargo craft... at best
lol. They’ve “unveiled” a cgi video. They can’t even get this thing to orbit nor does the current door work.
18 sec ago lmao
I came back.
starliner feels pointless. It costs more than the soyuz did. And it's doing it's first crewed mission after crew dragon has had what? 8 crewed flights?
Hello who's this?
Under ten seconds
so british
SpaceX: We got further with every subsequent launch!
*me checking the books* No Starship has made it into orbit yet. And the one that actually got to space properly lost any and all guidance the moment it got there and failed to achieve even it's sub-orbital trajactory at that. They were lucky it landed in the Indian Ocean as it did in stead of over Africa.
To add to the calamity, every Starship they blow up eats away at the budget they got from NASA for this thing. And they still haven't solved most other issues such as docking, refueling in space, habitation, and most important of all... a fully functional elevator to deploy humans on the moon and get them back off.
I see no reason for any celebration yet. While the budget is starting to shrink rapidly because every launch seems to burn up another Starship.
This is why musks idiotic silicon vally "move fast and break things approach" is extremely detrimental for rocket development. Space x got lucky with falcon 9 but starship is a different beast and they need to take things slower or nasa is gonna pull the plug and without nasas support space x is done for and unlike other industies musk cant move his company just start working with other countries for financial backing and support because the US government specifically the military would never allow american made rockets to be sold yo other countries since in the wrong hands one of these rockets is an icbm.
The US inovates
The EU regulates
And china always imitates.
and you can't even spell
We have still only seen renders of this so called "moonship" mean while starship proper has to actually achice orbit or make a proper return trip. When will people realize that startship is an inherently flawed platform that will never meet the lofty promises musk has made for it. The fact that so much of the Artemis program relies on this thing is a travesty
is that the one that landed on mars a few years back?
I liked my own comment
I swear if I see another x views in x minutes bro really fell off I will do something
Report for spam?
вы можете представить самую большую глупость, - как попытку сажать "ракетную башню" в каменном карьере после бомбёжки!?
- вот точно так же будет выглядеть посадка (башни) старшипа на Луну!
- если Маск и К" - не придумают горизонтальную посадочную версию старшипа, то вся их затея с лунной миссией будет фикцией!
примите к сведению - Советские посадочные платформы лунных миссий для доставки Луноходов и Возвращаемых капсул... - эти платформы были выполнены в виде "черепах", и то как минимум одна перевернулась, попав при посадке на край кратера или на большие камни, - а кто будет чистить площадку на луне для старшипа!?