Brilliant moves, inaccuracies & mistakes its all here (Rapid episode 23)

Ruy Lopez
low elo chess
intermediate chess
beginner chess
blunder
end game
exchange sacrifice
attacking chess
100 elo chess
200 elo chess
300 elo chess
400 elo chess
500 elo chess
600 elo chess
700 elo chess
800 elo chess
900 elo chess
1000 elo chess
1100 elo chess
1200 elo chess
1300 elo chess
1400 elo chess
1500 elo chess
1600 elo chess
1700 elo chess
1800 elo chess
1900 elo chess
2000 elo chess

[@bosnbruce5837]

you gonna be spiting..
and you really are spitting
WT...

[@Grenbork]

41:35 I think the point is rook on a8 is now protected and if you take Qxf5+ he now has Nf6 - you still better, but only pawn up instead of exchange and pawn. Nice game! subscribed

[@Redneckchessclub]

Thank you, buddy! Yea i guess it is better that losing the rook but I dont know why it just didnt like the bishop sac at all. I thought it was a good move even if i do only get the bishop back i still won a pawn and made my opponent lose castling rights.

[@Grenbork]

@@Redneckchessclub Oh, now i get you! I rewatched this part and its probably want you to play Qf3 instead of bishop sack. Here you threatening mate in 1 and rook on a8

[@robbrown3925]

41:34 I think you were getting mixed up between your moves and the opponent's on the analysis. Instead of your bishop sac, you could have threatened checkmate _and_ the rook without losing the bishop (Qa8). The analysis shows their bishop being offered and their queen now protects the rook. Yes, you can take the bishop but then their rook is safe.

[@Redneckchessclub]

yea i didnt see that in the game but I did get him to lose castling rights which i thought was still a win

[@alex-cg6hq]

red neck chess club, that sounds like somewhere that I belong